
Contents
53.6 Arrhythmias in pregnancy
-
Published:July 2018
Cite
Abstract
The incidence of supraventricular tachycardia during pregnancy is low. The tachyarrhythmias are often well tolerated but may become more frequent, refractory, and symptomatic, and may even manifest for the first time during pregnancy even in the absence of structural heart disease. Arrhythmia requiring treatment develops in up to 15% of patients with structural heart disease during pregnancy. Ventricular arrhythmias and symptomatic bradycardia are rare.
This chapter provides the background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following current ESC Guidelines on: management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy - https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/eurheartj/article/39/34/3165/5078465#135910971
Summary
The incidence of supraventricular tachycardia during pregnancy is low. The tachyarrhythmias are often well tolerated but may become more frequent, refractory, and symptomatic, and may even manifest for the first time during pregnancy even in the absence of structural heart disease. Arrhythmia requiring treatment develops in up to 15% of patients with structural heart disease during pregnancy. Ventricular arrhythmias and symptomatic bradycardia are rare.
Arrhythmias
The incidence of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) during pregnancy is low.1 The tachyarrhythmias are often well tolerated2,3 but may become more frequent, refractory, and symptomatic,4 and may even manifest for the first time during pregnancy even in the absence of structural heart disease.5 Arrhythmia requiring treatment develops in up to 15% of patients with structural heart disease during pregnancy. Ventricular arrhythmias and symptomatic bradycardia are rare.1
Although some therapies have potential toxicity and side effects to the fetus, safe and effective alternatives are available for most cases.
For the majority of antiarrhythmic drugs there is not enough data to ensure safety during pregnancy. The risk of teratogenic effects is highest during the first 8–10 weeks of pregnancy. The lowest recommended dose should be used with close monitoring. Attention should be paid to symptoms of heart failure and to ruling out pregnancy-induced cardiomyopathy. Worsening factors, such as electrolytic imbalance, hyperthyroidism, and anaemia, should be corrected.
Supraventricular tachycardia
Acute treatment
Vagal manoeuvers is the first line of treatment to terminate episodes of SVT, followed by adenosine intravenously (IV), which can be used safely6 (Table 53.6.1). Intravenous metoprolol or propranolol is the second choice. Verapamil IV may cause maternal hypotension. Direct current cardioversion is recommended for all sustained tachycardia with haemodynamic compromise and can safely be performed at all stages of pregnancy.7 It is a second option in well-tolerated SVT if drug therapy fails. Fetal rhythm monitoring is recommended since transient fetal arrhythmia has been reported.8 Transoesophageal overdrive pacing is an alternative for cardioversion.
Acute treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) | Vagal manoeuvres are recommended |
Adenosine IV is recommended | |
Synchronized DC cardioversion is recommended if haemodynamically unstable SVT or if pharmacological therapy fails or is contraindicated | |
Metoprolol, propranolol IV is reasonable when adenosine fails or is contraindicated | |
Overdrive pacing via oesophagus is reasonable when adenosine fails or is contraindicated | |
Verapamil IV may be considered if potentially life-threatening SVT when other attempts fail or are contraindicated. | |
Long-term therapy of highly symptomatic SVT | Metoprolol, propranolol is reasonable for management of highly symptomatic patients |
Verapamil is reasonable for management of highly symptomatic patients | |
Flecainide is reasonable for management of highly symptomatic patients if other drugs fail | |
Sotalol can be used if other therapies fail but is not recommended in patients with structural heart disease due to its proarrhythmic effects | |
Digoxin is reasonable for atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter if other drugs fail | |
Procainamide, Disopyramide may be used if other alternatives fail | |
Catheter ablation may be reasonable for management of highly symptomatic patients and recurrent SVT with cation to reduce radiation exposure | |
Atenolol should not be used due to its side effect with growth retardation | |
Acute treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) | Electrical cardioversion or defibrillation is recommended for sustained VT or VF. |
Sotalol or procainamide IV may be considered for acute conversion of haemodynamically stable monomorphic sustained VT. | |
Amiodarone IV may be considered for conversion of sustained monomorphic VT when haemodynamically unstable and refractory to electrical cardioversion or not responding to other drugs. | |
Long-term treatment of VT | Implantation of an ICD is recommended if clinically indicated |
Beta-blocking agents are recommended in patients with LQTS or CPVT and should continue after pregnancy | |
Oral metoprolol, propranolol is recommended as first choice and verapamil as second choice for idiopathic sustained VT | |
Catheter ablation may be considered for management of drug-refractory and poorly tolerated VT |
Acute treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) | Vagal manoeuvres are recommended |
Adenosine IV is recommended | |
Synchronized DC cardioversion is recommended if haemodynamically unstable SVT or if pharmacological therapy fails or is contraindicated | |
Metoprolol, propranolol IV is reasonable when adenosine fails or is contraindicated | |
Overdrive pacing via oesophagus is reasonable when adenosine fails or is contraindicated | |
Verapamil IV may be considered if potentially life-threatening SVT when other attempts fail or are contraindicated. | |
Long-term therapy of highly symptomatic SVT | Metoprolol, propranolol is reasonable for management of highly symptomatic patients |
Verapamil is reasonable for management of highly symptomatic patients | |
Flecainide is reasonable for management of highly symptomatic patients if other drugs fail | |
Sotalol can be used if other therapies fail but is not recommended in patients with structural heart disease due to its proarrhythmic effects | |
Digoxin is reasonable for atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter if other drugs fail | |
Procainamide, Disopyramide may be used if other alternatives fail | |
Catheter ablation may be reasonable for management of highly symptomatic patients and recurrent SVT with cation to reduce radiation exposure | |
Atenolol should not be used due to its side effect with growth retardation | |
Acute treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) | Electrical cardioversion or defibrillation is recommended for sustained VT or VF. |
Sotalol or procainamide IV may be considered for acute conversion of haemodynamically stable monomorphic sustained VT. | |
Amiodarone IV may be considered for conversion of sustained monomorphic VT when haemodynamically unstable and refractory to electrical cardioversion or not responding to other drugs. | |
Long-term treatment of VT | Implantation of an ICD is recommended if clinically indicated |
Beta-blocking agents are recommended in patients with LQTS or CPVT and should continue after pregnancy | |
Oral metoprolol, propranolol is recommended as first choice and verapamil as second choice for idiopathic sustained VT | |
Catheter ablation may be considered for management of drug-refractory and poorly tolerated VT |
Long-term treatment
Prophylactic antiarrhythmic drugs should be used with caution if symptoms are intolerable or if tachycardia causes haemodynamic compromise (Table 53.6.1).
Beta blockers, metoprolol, propranolol, and acebutolol, are the first-line treatment, preferably after the first trimester.9 Long-term use of atenolol has been associated with intrauterine growth retardation and is not recommended.10 Metoprolol and acebutolol have β1-selective properties and are less likely to interfere with β2-mediated uterine relaxation.11 Verapamil is considered to be relatively safe.12 For refractory cases or for patients with Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome, Vaughan Williams class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs may be considered. Flecainide appears to be well tolerated and reasonably safe. The experience with propafenone and disopyramide is limited, the latter associated with uterus contractions.
Focal atrial tachycardia is rare during pregnancy. Beta blockers or digoxin are drugs of choice.
Catheter ablation has been reported to be effective with minimal maternal and fetal complications,13 but should be restricted to drug-refractory, poorly tolerated SVT and avoided in the first trimester. The radiation should be minimized by using non-fluoroscopic mapping systems and intracardiac echocardiography. Ablation should only be performed in experienced centres and by skilled operators.
Ventricular arrhythmias
New onset of ventricular tachycardia should prompt an investigation to rule out a structural abnormality. Ventricular premature beats during pregnancy are, as a rule, benign.5 For symptomatic ventricular premature beats, beta blockers may be used.
Idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia is the most common and usually well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia (VT).14 If severe symptoms or haemodynamic compromise occur, beta blockers or verapamil should be tried.15 Catheter ablation can be performed in drug-refractory cases.15
Long QT syndrome patients, especially long QT syndrome type 2, have a higher risk for cardiac events postpartum.16,17,18,19,20 Beta blockers reduce the risk of arrhythmia and are highly recommended.15,18,20 Brugada syndrome does not seem to aggravate arrhythmias during pregnancy.21 For catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, close monitoring and beta blockers are recommended.22,23,24 In arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, pregnancy has been well tolerated.25,26,27,28,29,30,31
Acute therapy is outlined in Table 53.6.1. Direct current cardioversion is the first choice in sustained VT with haemodynamic compromise. In well-tolerated VT, IV antiarrhythmic drugs or overdrive pacing can be considered (Table 53.6.1). In recurrent or refractory VT, amiodarone may be tried.15 Long-term therapy with cardioselective beta blockers is considered safe (Table 53.6.1). Class IC drugs are a second choice in the absence of structural heart disease. Amiodarone should only be used in therapy-resistant VT.15
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators may be implanted safely during pregnancy.32,33 The experience of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation during pregnancy is limited. The presence of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator does not itself contraindicate future pregnancy.
Bradyarrhythmia
Asymptomatic bradycardia may become symptomatic, especially with structural heart disease. In patients without structural heart disease, bradycardia usually implies no fetal or maternal complications.
Sinus bradycardia may occur during delivery. Rare cases of sinus bradycardia during pregnancy have been attributed to the supine hypotensive syndrome of pregnancy. It should be managed by changing the position of the mother. For persistent symptoms, a temporary pacemaker may be necessary.
First-degree atrioventricular block may occur and usually does not progress. Second-degree atrioventricular block is rare, and usually associated with structural heart disease or drug therapy. The majority of cases are asymptomatic second-degree Wenckebach block. In patients with congenital heart disease, second-degree block may occur in repaired tetralogy of Fallot or after repair of a ventricular septal defect.
Acquired complete heart block is rare. Isolated congenital complete heart block has a favourable outcome during pregnancy, especially if the QRS complexes are narrow. Supportive pacing is usually not necessary, but close surveillance is warranted since some patients can develop heart failure. Vaginal delivery carries no extra risks for a mother with congenital complete heart block.
Temporary pacing during delivery is recommended in selected women with complete heart block and symptoms. Since complete heart block usually has a favourable outcome, implantation of a permanent pacemaker before pregnancy is, in general, not indicated. Implantation can be performed safely, preferably beyond 8 weeks’ gestation. Echocardiography guidance may be helpful for implantation.15 Obstetrical management of a pregnant woman with an already implanted permanent pacemaker is of low risk.
Women with heart failure during pregnancy and postpartum should be treated according to current guidelines for non-pregnant patients, respecting contraindications for some drugs.
If left ventricular ejection fraction does not normalize in women with PPCM and DCM, the risk for deterioration in a subsequent pregnancy is significantly increased and patients should be informed accordingly.
Delivery should be planned in patients with cardiomyopathies and performed with beta-blocker protection in women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
References
1. Li JM, Nguyen C, Joglar JA, Hamdan MH, Page RL.
2. Tawam M, Levine J, Mendelson M, Goldberger J, Dyer A, Kadish A.
3. Widerhorn J, Widerhorn AL, Rahimtoola SH, Elkayam U.
4. Lee SH, Chen SA, Wu TJ, Chiang CE, Cheng CC, Tai CT, Chiou CW, Ueng KC, Chang MS.
5. Shotan A, Ostrzega E, Mehra A, Johnson JV, Elkayam U.
6. Elkayam U, Goodwin TM.
7. Tromp CH, Nanne AC, Pernet PJ, Tukkie R, Bolte AC.
8. Barnes EJ, Eben F, Patterson D.
9. Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Camm AJ, Campbell WB, Haines DE, Kuck KH, Lerman BB, Miller DD, Shaeffer CW Jr, Stevenson WG, Tomaselli GF, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Alpert JS, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Gregoratos G, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Russell RO Jr, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Burgos EF, Cowie M, Deckers JW, Garcia MA, Klein WW, Lekakis J, Lindahl B, Mazzotta G, Morais JC, Oto A, Smiseth O, Trappe HJ, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines.
10. Lydakis C, Lip GY, Beevers M, Beevers DG.
11. Frishman WH, Chesner M.
12. Joglar JA, Page RL.
13. Driver K, Chisholm CA, Darby AE, Malhotra R, Dimarco JP, Ferguson JD.
14. Nakagawa M, Katou S, Ichinose M, Nobe S, Yonemochi H, Miyakawa I, Saikawa T.
15. European Society of Gynecology, Association for European Paediatric Cardiology, German Society for Gender Medicine, Regitz-Zagrosek V, Blomstrom Lundqvist C, Borghi C, Cifkova R, Ferreira R, Foidart JM, Gibbs JS, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Gorenek B, Iung B, Kirby M, Maas AH, Morais J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Pieper PG, Presbitero P, Roos-Hesselink JW, Schaufelberger M, Seeland U, Torracca L, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines.
16. Rashba EJ, Zareba W, Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Robinson J, Locati EH, Schwartz PJ, Andrews M.
17. Khositseth A, Tester DJ, Will ML, Bell CM, Ackerman MJ.
18. Heradien MJ, Goosen A, Crotti L, Durrheim G, Corfield V, Brink PA, Schwartz PJ.
19. Garg L, Garg J, Krishnamoorthy P, Ahnert A, Shah N, Dusaj RS, Bozorgnia B.
20. Seth R, Moss AJ, McNitt S, Zareba W, Andrews ML, Qi M, Robinson JL, Goldenberg I, Ackerman MJ, Benhorin J, Kaufman ES, Locati EH, Napolitano C, Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Towbin JA, Vincent GM, Zhang L.
21. Rodriguez-Manero M, Casado-Arroyo R, Sarkozy A, Leysen E, Sieira JA, Namdar M, Conte G, Levinstein M, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C, Brugada P.
22. Beery TA, Shah MJ, Benson DW.
23. Friday KP, Moak JP, Fries MH, Iqbal SN.
24. Romagano MP, Quinones JN, Ahnert A, Martinez R, Smulian JC.
25. Cozzolino M, Perelli F, Corioni S, Carpinella G, Mecacci F.
26. Doyle NM, Monga M, Montgomery B, Dougherty AH.
27. Iriyama T, Kamei Y, Kozuma S, Taketani Y.
28. Agir A, Bozyel S, Celikyurt U, Argan O, Yilmaz I, Karauzum K, Vural A.
29. Lee LC, Bathgate SL, Macri CJ.
30. Bauce B, Daliento L, Frigo G, Russo G, Nava A.
31. Hodes AR, Tichnell C, Te Riele AS, Murray B, Groeneweg JA, Sawant AC, Russell SD, van Spaendonck-Zwarts KY, van den Berg MP, Wilde AA, Tandri H, Judge DP, Hauer RN, Calkins H, van Tintelen JP, James CA.
32. Miyoshi T, Kamiya CA, Katsuragi S, Ueda H, Kobayashi Y, Horiuchi C, Yamanaka K, Neki R, Yoshimatsu J, Ikeda T, Yamada Y, Okamura H, Noda T, Shimizu W.
33. Boule S, Ovart L, Marquie C, Botcherby E, Klug D, Kouakam C, Brigadeau F, Guedon-Moreau L, Wissocque L, Meurice J, Lacroix D, Kacet S.
Further reading
Lee SH, Chen SA, Wu TJ, Chiang CE, Cheng CC, Tai CT, Chiou CW, Ueng KC, Chang MS.
Li JM, Nguyen C, Joglar JA, Hamdan MH, Page RL.
Tawam M, Levine J, Mendelson M, Goldberger J, Dyer A, Kadish A.
Widerhorn J, Widerhorn AL, Rahimtoola SH, Elkayam U.
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 54 |
November 2022 | 33 |
December 2022 | 30 |
January 2023 | 37 |
February 2023 | 39 |
March 2023 | 29 |
April 2023 | 51 |
May 2023 | 24 |
June 2023 | 30 |
July 2023 | 33 |
August 2023 | 29 |
September 2023 | 35 |
October 2023 | 40 |
November 2023 | 28 |
December 2023 | 18 |
January 2024 | 17 |
February 2024 | 21 |
March 2024 | 24 |
April 2024 | 29 |
May 2024 | 30 |
June 2024 | 30 |
July 2024 | 22 |
August 2024 | 9 |
September 2024 | 20 |
October 2024 | 21 |
November 2024 | 22 |
December 2024 | 14 |
January 2025 | 14 |
February 2025 | 12 |
March 2025 | 10 |
April 2025 | 13 |