Abstract

Context

Recent data on long-term outcomes and aggressiveness of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) are lacking for patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2).

Objectives

To analyze the long-term outcomes in MEN2 and compare MTC aggressiveness in three defined RET mutation-risk categories: moderate risk (MOD), high risk (H), and highest risk (HST).

Design, Setting

Retrospective study of 263 operated patients with MEN2 from one German tertiary referral center from 1979 to 2017 comparing demographic, biochemical, genetic, and outcome parameters

Intervention

None (observational study)

Main Outcome Measure

Long-term survival and outcomes in three risk groups

Results

Surgery was performed at a mean age of 35.3 ± 18.8 (MOD, n = 122), 23.0 ± 15.7 years (H, n = 120), and 14.9 ± 9.3 (HST, n = 21) years (P < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 12.9 ± 9.8 years. Age and tumor stage at diagnosis differed among the three risk groups (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis of disease-specific survival (DSS) showed that increasing age [hazard ratio (HR), 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.09], stage III/IV at diagnosis (HR, 7.39; 95% CI, 2.39 to 22.8), and HST group (HR, 14.4; 95% CI, 3.32 to 62.6) were significantly associated with worse DSS; the H group was not (P = 0.175). The DSS rates and outcomes were not different between the MOD and H groups (P = 0.179 and P = 0.893, respectively) but were significantly inferior in the HST group (P < 0.0008 and P < 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

MTC in patients with MEN2 showed a clearly different age of onset in the different risk groups. DSS and outcomes after MTC diagnosis were similar in the MOD and H groups, suggesting similar tumor behavior. The HST group had inferior outcomes and survival vs the MOD and or H groups.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) is an autosomal-dominant inherited cancer syndrome characterized by a high penetrance of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). MTC represents the most common cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with MEN2 and is usually the first clinical presentation of the disease. The syndrome is caused by one of several identified germline mutations in the RET (rearranged during transfection) proto-oncogene, with a strong genotype–phenotype correlation (1–3). A number of codon-specific RET mutations have been well defined and stratified into risk levels by the American Thyroid Association (ATA). The ATA guidelines for the management of MTC have categorized mutations as moderate risk (MOD), high risk (H), and highest risk (HST) (2). The guidelines have defined the HST category (RET M918T mutations) as a distinct clinical entity with its own phenotype (MEN2B). This category has the earliest onset, poorer clinical outcomes, and increased MTC aggressiveness compared with MEN2A. Within MEN2A, the guidelines have defined an H RET category (mainly codon 634 mutations), which has been associated with more aggressive disease, and a MOD risk category (all other RET mutations), which has been associated with later onset and more benign behavior than the H category. This categorization has been based on mutations associated with similar MTC disease aggressiveness and the assumption that individuals with an earlier development of the disease would also develop metastatic disease earlier, leading to worse outcomes, and, therefore, must have more virulent mutations.

Despite this classification, the disease patterns vary greatly within a defined risk group with the same codon-specific mutation and, even, within the same family (4, 5). The HST patients (MEN2B) will develop MTC at an early age but with wide-ranging aggressiveness. Recent studies found good long-term overall and stage-specific survival rates for patients with MEN2B, which suggested that MTC in MEN2B might not be intrinsically more aggressive than MTC in MEN2A or sporadic MTC (6, 7). Another comparative study found that patients with MOD and H germline RET mutations experienced similar overall survival and intervals to the development of distant metastatic disease after diagnosis, suggesting that MTC is similar in clinical aggressiveness after the pathologic diagnosis (8).

In the present, large, single-institution study of 263 patients with MEN2, we analyzed the clinical disease-specific survival (DSS) and outcomes in the three RET mutation risk groups in MEN2 during the past 40 years.

Patients and Methods

Patients

We performed a retrospective medical record review of 329 patients with an established MEN2 diagnosis from 1979 to 2017. Using a standardized case report form, we retrieved epidemiological, genotypic, clinical, biochemical, and imaging data and data from the surgical procedures. All the patients had been seen at regular intervals, every 6 to 12 months, by two of us (K.F.-R., F.R.) at the endocrine outpatient clinic of the University of Heidelberg (1979 to 1995) and at a specialized endocrine practice in Heidelberg (1996 to 2017). Care was provided in accordance with the state-of-the-art clinical and therapeutic protocol at the diagnosis (2, 9).

Methods

All laboratory tests and imaging procedures were performed as part of routine care using standard commercial tests. Calcitonin (Ctn) was measured using a wide variety of assays during the 40-year interval. The patients were considered cured of MTC when the Ctn values were considered undetectable according to the functional sensitivity of the assay used or when the serum Ctn level was within the reference range at the last biochemical follow-up examination or <10 pg/mL.

MEN2 was diagnosed if the genetic analysis showed a mutation of the RET gene. A total of 35 patients were excluded from the analysis: 7 with unavailable RET molecular analysis results and 28 with only insufficient data available. Of the remaining 294 patients with verified RET mutations, 31 were gene carriers who had not yet undergone surgery and 263 who had undergone thyroidectomy. MTC and/or C-cell hyperplasia was diagnosed from the histopathological examination findings. The tumor stage was defined according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification, 7th edition (10), and were based on the clinical and pathological assessments. C-cell hyperplasia only was classified as stage 0.

The 263 patients with MEN2 were subgrouped by risk categories according to the RET mutation status, as suggested by the ATA: HST (codon 918; n = 21), H (codons 634 and 883; n = 120), and MOD (all other mutations, excluding codon 918 and codons 634 and 883; n = 122; Table 1) (2). The patients belonged to 118 families, 54 in the MOD, 44 in the H, and 20 in the HST group. The number of index patients was 53, 27, and 20 in the MOD, H, and HST groups, respectively. Some of the index patients were not in our care. If the first screening in the families revealed signs or symptoms of MEN2, the patients underwent surgery directly (40, 52, and 1 in the MOD, H, and HST group, respectively). In the asymptomatic gene carriers, surgery was delayed by 2 ± 1.3 years in MOD and 1.6 ± 0.7 years in the H group until the Ctn level was greater than the upper reference range (27 patients in the MOD and 41 patients in the H group). Time-dependent onset and progression of MTC were determined by comparing the mean age at stage I (T1 tumor) and stage III (lymph node-positive disease) of the patients, stratified by the ATA risk group.

Table 1.

Description of MEN2 Cohort of Surgically Treated Patients Classified in Three RET Mutation Risk Groups

CharacteristicAll PatientsATA MOD GroupATA H GroupATA HST GroupP Value
GenotypeNAExon 10, 13–15RET C634X, A883FRET M918T
Patients, n26312212021
Age at surgery, y
 Mean ± SD28.0 ± 18.135.3 ± 18.823.0 ± 15.714.9 ± 9.3< 0.0001a
 Median (range)25 (0.5–81)33 (1-78)21 (1–81)15 (0.5–40)H-HST, 0.043b
Sex, n (%)
 Male113 (43)55 (45)52 (43)6 (29)
 Female150 (57)67 (55)68 (57)15 (71)
Stage, n (%)< 0.0001c
 All260 (100)121 (100)118 (100)21 (100)
 047 (18)31 (26)15 (13)1 (5)
 I82 (32)30 (25)50 (42)2 (10)
 II46 (18)17 (14)26 (22)3 (14)
 III67 (25)38 (31)22 (19)7 (33)
 IV18 (7)5 (4)5 (4)8 (38)
Follow-up duration, y0.0001d
 Mean ± SD12.9 ± 9.810.8 ± 9.015.8 ± 9.513.3 ± 12.1
 Median (range)12 (1–48)7.5 (1–38)16 (1–46)9 (1–48)
Status at final follow-up, n (%)261 (100)122 (100)118 (100)21 (100)
 No evidence of disease144 (55)69 (56)72 (61)3 (14)< 0.0001c
 Minimal disease55 (21)28 (23)23 (19)4 (19)
 Metastasis39 (15)17 (14)15 (13)7 (33)M-H, 0.8936c
 Death from disease23 (9)8 (7)8 (7)7 (33)
CharacteristicAll PatientsATA MOD GroupATA H GroupATA HST GroupP Value
GenotypeNAExon 10, 13–15RET C634X, A883FRET M918T
Patients, n26312212021
Age at surgery, y
 Mean ± SD28.0 ± 18.135.3 ± 18.823.0 ± 15.714.9 ± 9.3< 0.0001a
 Median (range)25 (0.5–81)33 (1-78)21 (1–81)15 (0.5–40)H-HST, 0.043b
Sex, n (%)
 Male113 (43)55 (45)52 (43)6 (29)
 Female150 (57)67 (55)68 (57)15 (71)
Stage, n (%)< 0.0001c
 All260 (100)121 (100)118 (100)21 (100)
 047 (18)31 (26)15 (13)1 (5)
 I82 (32)30 (25)50 (42)2 (10)
 II46 (18)17 (14)26 (22)3 (14)
 III67 (25)38 (31)22 (19)7 (33)
 IV18 (7)5 (4)5 (4)8 (38)
Follow-up duration, y0.0001d
 Mean ± SD12.9 ± 9.810.8 ± 9.015.8 ± 9.513.3 ± 12.1
 Median (range)12 (1–48)7.5 (1–38)16 (1–46)9 (1–48)
Status at final follow-up, n (%)261 (100)122 (100)118 (100)21 (100)
 No evidence of disease144 (55)69 (56)72 (61)3 (14)< 0.0001c
 Minimal disease55 (21)28 (23)23 (19)4 (19)
 Metastasis39 (15)17 (14)15 (13)7 (33)M-H, 0.8936c
 Death from disease23 (9)8 (7)8 (7)7 (33)

Abbreviation: M-H, moderate-high.

a

ANOVA.

b

t Test.

c

χ2 Test.

d

Kruskal-Wallis-test.

Table 1.

Description of MEN2 Cohort of Surgically Treated Patients Classified in Three RET Mutation Risk Groups

CharacteristicAll PatientsATA MOD GroupATA H GroupATA HST GroupP Value
GenotypeNAExon 10, 13–15RET C634X, A883FRET M918T
Patients, n26312212021
Age at surgery, y
 Mean ± SD28.0 ± 18.135.3 ± 18.823.0 ± 15.714.9 ± 9.3< 0.0001a
 Median (range)25 (0.5–81)33 (1-78)21 (1–81)15 (0.5–40)H-HST, 0.043b
Sex, n (%)
 Male113 (43)55 (45)52 (43)6 (29)
 Female150 (57)67 (55)68 (57)15 (71)
Stage, n (%)< 0.0001c
 All260 (100)121 (100)118 (100)21 (100)
 047 (18)31 (26)15 (13)1 (5)
 I82 (32)30 (25)50 (42)2 (10)
 II46 (18)17 (14)26 (22)3 (14)
 III67 (25)38 (31)22 (19)7 (33)
 IV18 (7)5 (4)5 (4)8 (38)
Follow-up duration, y0.0001d
 Mean ± SD12.9 ± 9.810.8 ± 9.015.8 ± 9.513.3 ± 12.1
 Median (range)12 (1–48)7.5 (1–38)16 (1–46)9 (1–48)
Status at final follow-up, n (%)261 (100)122 (100)118 (100)21 (100)
 No evidence of disease144 (55)69 (56)72 (61)3 (14)< 0.0001c
 Minimal disease55 (21)28 (23)23 (19)4 (19)
 Metastasis39 (15)17 (14)15 (13)7 (33)M-H, 0.8936c
 Death from disease23 (9)8 (7)8 (7)7 (33)
CharacteristicAll PatientsATA MOD GroupATA H GroupATA HST GroupP Value
GenotypeNAExon 10, 13–15RET C634X, A883FRET M918T
Patients, n26312212021
Age at surgery, y
 Mean ± SD28.0 ± 18.135.3 ± 18.823.0 ± 15.714.9 ± 9.3< 0.0001a
 Median (range)25 (0.5–81)33 (1-78)21 (1–81)15 (0.5–40)H-HST, 0.043b
Sex, n (%)
 Male113 (43)55 (45)52 (43)6 (29)
 Female150 (57)67 (55)68 (57)15 (71)
Stage, n (%)< 0.0001c
 All260 (100)121 (100)118 (100)21 (100)
 047 (18)31 (26)15 (13)1 (5)
 I82 (32)30 (25)50 (42)2 (10)
 II46 (18)17 (14)26 (22)3 (14)
 III67 (25)38 (31)22 (19)7 (33)
 IV18 (7)5 (4)5 (4)8 (38)
Follow-up duration, y0.0001d
 Mean ± SD12.9 ± 9.810.8 ± 9.015.8 ± 9.513.3 ± 12.1
 Median (range)12 (1–48)7.5 (1–38)16 (1–46)9 (1–48)
Status at final follow-up, n (%)261 (100)122 (100)118 (100)21 (100)
 No evidence of disease144 (55)69 (56)72 (61)3 (14)< 0.0001c
 Minimal disease55 (21)28 (23)23 (19)4 (19)
 Metastasis39 (15)17 (14)15 (13)7 (33)M-H, 0.8936c
 Death from disease23 (9)8 (7)8 (7)7 (33)

Abbreviation: M-H, moderate-high.

a

ANOVA.

b

t Test.

c

χ2 Test.

d

Kruskal-Wallis-test.

The primary endpoints were DSS (death from MTC) and the final outcome at the end of the study period. The survival time was calculated as the interval from the initial operation for MTC until death from MTC or the last follow-up examination. For the final outcome analysis, the patients were stratified into four groups according to their response to therapy: cured (biochemical evidence of cure, with Ctn undetectable or within the normal range), minimal residual disease (elevated Ctn but no structurally identifiable disease), metastasis (structurally identifiable disease), and death (cancer-related death from progressive MTC) (11). The ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg approved the study protocol (approval no. S-003/2015).

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are expressed as the mean ± SD and range and categorical data as the absolute and relative frequencies. Between-group differences were calculated using ANOVA for continuous data, the t test for two-group comparisons of the continuous data, the Kruskal-Wallis test for the follow-up duration, and the χ2 test for the categorical data. The analyses were performed with patients grouped according to the ATA risk categories, tumor stage, and outcomes according to the response to therapy. MTC survival was illustrated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The different tumor stages were compared using a log-rank test. The possible prognostic factors for DSS were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Because the present study was a retrospective observational study, no adjustments for multiple testing were performed. All statistical analyses were descriptive and were performed using SAS, version 9.4 WIN (SAS Institute).

Results

Patient demographics

Our cohort included 263 patients (113 males and 150 females) with an established MEN2 diagnosis. The 263 patients were classified according to the mutation risk group: MOD (n = 122), H (n = 120), and HST (n = 21; Table 1). The results of respective RET analyses are shown in Table 2. The MOD group included 44 patients with exon 10 codons 611, 618, and 620; 3 patients with exon 11 codon 630 mutations; 74 patients with exon 13-15 codon 768, 790, 791, 804, 891, and 904 mutations; and 1 patient with an exon 8 codon 553 mutation. The H group consisted of 119 patients with 634 mutations and 1 patient with an A883F mutation. The HST group consisted of 21 patients with the M918T mutation (Table 2). The mean age at initial surgery differed substantially among the three risk groups (P < 0.0001; Table 1). The youngest mean age was 14.9 years for the HST group compared with 23 years for the H group and 35.3 years for the MOD group. The mean follow-up time was 12.9 ± 9.8 years (range, 1 to 48 years). The mean observation time was 15.8 years for the H, 13.3 years for the HST, and 10.8 years for the MOD groups and differed substantially. More than one half of patients had a diagnosis of localized disease, with stage 0 (C-cell hyperplasia) and stage I (T1 tumor) disease comprising 51% of MOD and 55% of H patients but only 15% of HST patients. In addition, 35% of MOD patients and 23% of H patients had tumors that had extended beyond the thyroid (stage III and IV) compared with 71% of HST patients. A statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of the tumor stage at diagnosis among the different risk groups (P < 0.0001). The index patients (n = 100) were older (36.1 ± 17.7 years) than the nonindex patients (n = 163; 23.1 ± 16.8 years). Also, their diagnosis was at a more advanced tumor stage in all risk groups (P < 0.0001, χ2 test), and they had worse outcomes (P < 0.0001). Finally, 20 of the 23 patients who had died of MTC had belonged to the group of index patients.

Table 2.

RET Mutations in MOD, H, and HST Groups

ATA GroupMutationPatients, n
MOD
G533C1
C611F5
C618R/S/G/F5/18/1/1
C620R/G/F/Y7/2/2/3
C630R3
E768N1
L790F17
Y791F8
V804L/M2/28
S891A17
S904F1
 Total122
H
C634R30
C634G23
C634F4
C634W13
C634Y49
A883F1
 Total120
HST
M918T21
 Total21
ATA GroupMutationPatients, n
MOD
G533C1
C611F5
C618R/S/G/F5/18/1/1
C620R/G/F/Y7/2/2/3
C630R3
E768N1
L790F17
Y791F8
V804L/M2/28
S891A17
S904F1
 Total122
H
C634R30
C634G23
C634F4
C634W13
C634Y49
A883F1
 Total120
HST
M918T21
 Total21
Table 2.

RET Mutations in MOD, H, and HST Groups

ATA GroupMutationPatients, n
MOD
G533C1
C611F5
C618R/S/G/F5/18/1/1
C620R/G/F/Y7/2/2/3
C630R3
E768N1
L790F17
Y791F8
V804L/M2/28
S891A17
S904F1
 Total122
H
C634R30
C634G23
C634F4
C634W13
C634Y49
A883F1
 Total120
HST
M918T21
 Total21
ATA GroupMutationPatients, n
MOD
G533C1
C611F5
C618R/S/G/F5/18/1/1
C620R/G/F/Y7/2/2/3
C630R3
E768N1
L790F17
Y791F8
V804L/M2/28
S891A17
S904F1
 Total122
H
C634R30
C634G23
C634F4
C634W13
C634Y49
A883F1
 Total120
HST
M918T21
 Total21

To further calculate the onset and progression of MTC, the patients were stratified according to the three risk groups with respect to age at tumor stage I and III. This resulted in a total of six different age groups, two for each risk group (Table 3). The age-related progression of MTC differed substantially across the three risk groups and within the two tumor stages. Stage I tumors presented in the different risk groups (MOD, H, and HST) at a mean age of 31.6, 17.7, and 4.3 years, respectively. Compared with the H group, MTC stage I presented 13.4 years earlier in the HST patients and 13.9 years later in the MOD patients. Within the different risk groups (M, H, and HST), the mean interval to the development from stage I to stage III disease was 10.1, 12.7, and 12.1 years, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

Age at Diagnosis of Stage I and Stage III in Three RET Mutation Risk Groups and Interval of Tumor Growth (Stage I to Stage III) Within and Among Risk Groups

Tumor StageMODHHSTP ValueMean Interval Between Risk Groups, y
MOD–HH–HST
IMOD–H, 0.000113.913.4
 Patients, n33502
 Age, y31.6 ± 17.817.7 ± 13.74.3
IIIMOD–H 0.0049; H–HST, 0.0322; MOD–HST, < 0.0001
 Patients, n3822711.314.0
 Age, y41.7 ± 15.330.4 ± 13.016.4 ± 11.7
P value0.0140.0005
Mean interval from stage I to III, y10.112.712.1
Tumor StageMODHHSTP ValueMean Interval Between Risk Groups, y
MOD–HH–HST
IMOD–H, 0.000113.913.4
 Patients, n33502
 Age, y31.6 ± 17.817.7 ± 13.74.3
IIIMOD–H 0.0049; H–HST, 0.0322; MOD–HST, < 0.0001
 Patients, n3822711.314.0
 Age, y41.7 ± 15.330.4 ± 13.016.4 ± 11.7
P value0.0140.0005
Mean interval from stage I to III, y10.112.712.1
Table 3.

Age at Diagnosis of Stage I and Stage III in Three RET Mutation Risk Groups and Interval of Tumor Growth (Stage I to Stage III) Within and Among Risk Groups

Tumor StageMODHHSTP ValueMean Interval Between Risk Groups, y
MOD–HH–HST
IMOD–H, 0.000113.913.4
 Patients, n33502
 Age, y31.6 ± 17.817.7 ± 13.74.3
IIIMOD–H 0.0049; H–HST, 0.0322; MOD–HST, < 0.0001
 Patients, n3822711.314.0
 Age, y41.7 ± 15.330.4 ± 13.016.4 ± 11.7
P value0.0140.0005
Mean interval from stage I to III, y10.112.712.1
Tumor StageMODHHSTP ValueMean Interval Between Risk Groups, y
MOD–HH–HST
IMOD–H, 0.000113.913.4
 Patients, n33502
 Age, y31.6 ± 17.817.7 ± 13.74.3
IIIMOD–H 0.0049; H–HST, 0.0322; MOD–HST, < 0.0001
 Patients, n3822711.314.0
 Age, y41.7 ± 15.330.4 ± 13.016.4 ± 11.7
P value0.0140.0005
Mean interval from stage I to III, y10.112.712.1

Survival

Cancer-related survival rates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method (Fig. 1). DSS at 5, 10, and 20 years was 97.9%, 89.9%, and 89.9% for the MOD patients; 96.5%, 94.3%, and 93.2% for the H patients; and 89.1%, 76.8%, and 54.6% for the HST patients, respectively. The multivariate analysis for DSS found that tumor stage III/IV, increasing age at diagnosis, and HST were substantially associated with an increased risk of death; biological sex was not a statistically significant prognostic factor (Table 4). No difference in DSS was observed between the MOD and H patients. However, DSS among the HST patients was distinctly inferior compared with the DSS for the MOD and H patients.

DSS in the three RET mutation risk groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the MOD and H patients; however, the DSS for the HST group was significantly inferior statistically (P = 0.0008).
Figure 1.

DSS in the three RET mutation risk groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the MOD and H patients; however, the DSS for the HST group was significantly inferior statistically (P = 0.0008).

Table 4.

Multivariate Analysis of DSS and Prognostic Factors for Patients With Hereditary MTC

FactorHR95% CIP Value
Sex1.5200.641–3.6030.342
Age at diagnosis1.0581.024–1.0930.0008
Tumor stage III-IV7.3892.394–22.8130.0005
H group2.1030.718–6.1600.1752
HST group14.4123.316–62.6350.0004
FactorHR95% CIP Value
Sex1.5200.641–3.6030.342
Age at diagnosis1.0581.024–1.0930.0008
Tumor stage III-IV7.3892.394–22.8130.0005
H group2.1030.718–6.1600.1752
HST group14.4123.316–62.6350.0004
Table 4.

Multivariate Analysis of DSS and Prognostic Factors for Patients With Hereditary MTC

FactorHR95% CIP Value
Sex1.5200.641–3.6030.342
Age at diagnosis1.0581.024–1.0930.0008
Tumor stage III-IV7.3892.394–22.8130.0005
H group2.1030.718–6.1600.1752
HST group14.4123.316–62.6350.0004
FactorHR95% CIP Value
Sex1.5200.641–3.6030.342
Age at diagnosis1.0581.024–1.0930.0008
Tumor stage III-IV7.3892.394–22.8130.0005
H group2.1030.718–6.1600.1752
HST group14.4123.316–62.6350.0004

Clinical outcome

The tumor stage at diagnosis substantially affected the clinical outcomes. More than one half of the MOD patients (56%) and H patients (61%) but only 14% of the HST patients were considered cured, with undetectable Ctn levels or levels <10 pg/mL at the end of the study (Table 1; Fig. 2). Only 7% of MOD and H patients had died at the end of the study period compared with 33% of HST patients. No statistically significant difference was found in the outcomes between MOD (n = 122) and H (n = 118; P = 0.8936, χ2 test). However, the HST patients (n = 21) had substantially worse outcomes compared with the MOD and H patients (n = 220; P < 0.0001, χ2 test; Fig. 2). Only 4% of lymph node-positive patients had achieved long-term biochemical cure.

Disease outcome in the three RET mutation risk groups. MOD group, n = 122; H group, n = 118; HST group, n = 21.
Figure 2.

Disease outcome in the three RET mutation risk groups. MOD group, n = 122; H group, n = 118; HST group, n = 21.

Comparison of survival and outcome of patients with diagnosis before and after 1996

The comparison of the patients with a diagnosis and who had been surgically treated before (n = 103) and after 1996 (n = 157) showed a substantial shift to earlier tumor stages at diagnosis in recent years. This led to substantial improvement in the 10-year survival in all risk groups treated after 1996 (Table 5). The difference in survival between the risk groups seen before 1996 disappeared after 1996. No difference was found in stage-dependent survival before or after 1996. Parallel with better survival, the outcomes for all risk groups had improved. The number of cured patients (P = 0.0017), and patients with minimal residual disease (P = 0.0008) had increased in all risk groups, and the number of disease-specific deaths (P = 0.2982) and patients with metastases (P = 0.2360) did not significantly change over time.

Table 5.

Comparison of Patients With MTC Diagnosis and Treated Before and After 1996

CharacteristicBefore 1996After 1996P Value
Patients, n103157
Stage, n (%)< 0.0001a
 05 (4.9)42 (26.8)
 I26 (25.2)56 (35.7)
 II29 (28.2)17 (10.8)
 III36 (35.0)31 (19.8)
 IV7 (6.8)11 (7.0)
10-y Survival, %Before 1996, 0.0005b; after 1996, 0.63b
 MOD8592
 H9396
 HST6789
Outcome
 Cured, n/N (%)0.0017a
  MOD8/31 (25.8)61/91 (67.8)
  H27/62 (42.6)45/56 (80.3)
  HST1/10 (10)2/11 (18.1)
 Death, n/N (%)0.298a
  MOD4/31 (12.9)4/91(4.4)
  H6/62 (9.7)2/56 (3.6)
  HST6/10 (60)1/11 (9.1)
CharacteristicBefore 1996After 1996P Value
Patients, n103157
Stage, n (%)< 0.0001a
 05 (4.9)42 (26.8)
 I26 (25.2)56 (35.7)
 II29 (28.2)17 (10.8)
 III36 (35.0)31 (19.8)
 IV7 (6.8)11 (7.0)
10-y Survival, %Before 1996, 0.0005b; after 1996, 0.63b
 MOD8592
 H9396
 HST6789
Outcome
 Cured, n/N (%)0.0017a
  MOD8/31 (25.8)61/91 (67.8)
  H27/62 (42.6)45/56 (80.3)
  HST1/10 (10)2/11 (18.1)
 Death, n/N (%)0.298a
  MOD4/31 (12.9)4/91(4.4)
  H6/62 (9.7)2/56 (3.6)
  HST6/10 (60)1/11 (9.1)
a

χ2 Test.

b

Log-rank test.

Table 5.

Comparison of Patients With MTC Diagnosis and Treated Before and After 1996

CharacteristicBefore 1996After 1996P Value
Patients, n103157
Stage, n (%)< 0.0001a
 05 (4.9)42 (26.8)
 I26 (25.2)56 (35.7)
 II29 (28.2)17 (10.8)
 III36 (35.0)31 (19.8)
 IV7 (6.8)11 (7.0)
10-y Survival, %Before 1996, 0.0005b; after 1996, 0.63b
 MOD8592
 H9396
 HST6789
Outcome
 Cured, n/N (%)0.0017a
  MOD8/31 (25.8)61/91 (67.8)
  H27/62 (42.6)45/56 (80.3)
  HST1/10 (10)2/11 (18.1)
 Death, n/N (%)0.298a
  MOD4/31 (12.9)4/91(4.4)
  H6/62 (9.7)2/56 (3.6)
  HST6/10 (60)1/11 (9.1)
CharacteristicBefore 1996After 1996P Value
Patients, n103157
Stage, n (%)< 0.0001a
 05 (4.9)42 (26.8)
 I26 (25.2)56 (35.7)
 II29 (28.2)17 (10.8)
 III36 (35.0)31 (19.8)
 IV7 (6.8)11 (7.0)
10-y Survival, %Before 1996, 0.0005b; after 1996, 0.63b
 MOD8592
 H9396
 HST6789
Outcome
 Cured, n/N (%)0.0017a
  MOD8/31 (25.8)61/91 (67.8)
  H27/62 (42.6)45/56 (80.3)
  HST1/10 (10)2/11 (18.1)
 Death, n/N (%)0.298a
  MOD4/31 (12.9)4/91(4.4)
  H6/62 (9.7)2/56 (3.6)
  HST6/10 (60)1/11 (9.1)
a

χ2 Test.

b

Log-rank test.

Discussion

Comparing H and MOD groups in MEN2

Our data support the well-known observation that patients with MEN2 who carry a RET mutation within the HST group will develop MTC earliest, followed by patients who carry a mutation in the H group, and then those with mutations in the MOD group (12, 13). The patients with MEN2 in the different risk groups had a clearly different age of MTC onset (14.9, 23, and 35.3 years, respectively) with an interval of 8.1 to 12.3 years among the HST, H, and MOD groups (Table 1). Substantial differences in age at the appearance of T1 tumors (stage I; mean age, 4.3, 17.7, and 31.6 years in the HST, H, and MOD groups, respectively) and at the appearance of tumor in the cervical lymph nodes (stage III; mean age, 16.4, 30.4, and 41.7 years, respectively) were also observed among the three risk groups (Table 3). This age-related penetrance of MTC among the different RET mutations is well established and the basis for the age-related recommendation for the timing of prophylactic thyroidectomy (2). The classification into three risk categories (HST, H, and MOD) implies that the different risk groups will also exhibit different levels of MTC aggressiveness. With the development of MTC at an early age, a more aggressive course of MTC can be assumed. This gradation suggests that MTC development is age related and that progression will be more pronounced in the H and HST groups. However, this assumption must be changed owing to the comparable survival and outcomes observed in the H and MOD groups in the present study. These findings were first described in an earlier study by Voss et al. (8) in 2016. Their study specified that patients with H and MOD RET mutations had similar tumor stages at diagnosis, similar progression from stage I to stage III, a similar interval to the development of distant metastatic disease after the MTC diagnosis, and similar overall survival (and, therefore, a similar aggressive clinical course). Although individuals possessing H mutations presented with MTC earlier than did those with MOD mutations by nearly 13 years, once MTC had developed, the clinical course was statistically equivalent between the two groups in terms of the time to the development of lymph node-positive or distant metastatic disease and survival.

The natural course or growth rate of MTC cannot be measured directly. Tumor growth can be approximated by comparing the tumor diameter at different tumor stages at the surgical pathological level. With this procedure, the annual primary tumor growth rates for the different stages of MTC in the different risk groups were calculated by Machens et al. (14) in 2014. The primary tumor growth rates were not substantially different between the MOD and H patients. Moreover, the rate of lymph node development was 0.6 to 0.7 lymph node annually, independently of the ATA risk group. These results did not support the assumption that MTC aggressiveness depended on the mutation risk group. In an additional study of hereditary MTC grouped by RET mutational risk reported by Machens et al. (15) in 2018, the progression of MTC within the histopathological groups (normal/C-cell hyperplasia, lymph node-negative, and lymph node-positive MTC) was substantially age related. However, the change in status from lymph node-negative to lymph node-positive MTC occurred at similar intervals in all risk groups (8 to 12 years) (15). This finding was confirmed by our data: tumor growth between stage I (lymph node negative) and stage III (lymph node positive) had similar intervals of 12 years in the MOD and H groups (Table 3). These data imply that although they had an advanced age at onset, MOD patients can have equally aggressive tumors compared with H patients, although occurring later in life. Nevertheless, among the HST patients, we found a trend toward accelerated tumor progression compared with MOD and H patients. However, the number of patients in our study was too low for statistical analysis of this point.

Together with the findings from Voss et al. (8), these results support the hypothesis that MEN2A mutations in ATA MOD and H groups will determine the age of onset of MTC but that MTC is an equally aggressive tumor in the two groups after its initial onset.

Survival and outcome in MEN2B

We found that MTC will manifest 13.4 years earlier in the HST group than in the H group and is associated with the youngest age of onset. The tumor stage at diagnosis and survival in the HST group were inferior to those in the H and MOD groups. The presentation at diagnosis of the HST group was more comparable to that of sporadic MTC. Also, the HST group had worse outcomes than did the MOD and H groups, with a lower cure rate and a higher death rate. These results suggest that patients with MEN2B must be classified further in the HST group concerning the age at onset, tumor aggressiveness, and outcomes. Compared with MEN2A, there has been widespread failure to achieve early clinical recognition of MEN2B. In part, this failure has resulted from the lack of a family history component (mostly de novo mutations), the rarity of the disease, and the age-dependent development of the typical clinical phenotype later in childhood (6).

Characteristics, survival, and outcome of whole MEN2 cohort

Our cohort is comparable to other large MEN2 cohorts regarding the female/male ratio (12, 13, 16, 17), age at diagnosis (12, 13, 16, 17), and genotype and distribution of risk groups (17, 18). Concerning the TNM stage, our cohort seemed to differ from others (12), with a greater proportion of patients with C-cell hyperplasia and stage I disease, presumably owing to the high proportion of screening patients.

The survival of patients with MEN2 has improved within the past 20 years (19). In our MOD group, the 10- and 20-year survival rates were 90% and 90%, respectively. The 10- and 20-year survival rates were 94% and 93%, respectively, in the H group, and distinctly inferior (77% and 55%, respectively) in the HST group. This positive trend was confirmed in all risk groups by comparing the patients who had undergone surgery before and after 1996 (Table 5). This improvement was attributed to the earlier diagnosis and surgery, with a shift toward more favorable tumor stages affecting survival and outcome. This considerable progress made in the last decades was achieved by the use of molecular and biochemical screening and the increasing use of comprehensive operative techniques.

Appropriately, the diagnosis for nearly 50% of H and MOD patients will be at early stages (C-cell hyperplasia or stage I) and these patients will be cured compared with only 14% of HST patients. Among the cured patients, 119 had Ctn levels <0.5 pg/mL and 19 had Ctn levels of <0.5 to 10 pg/mL. Only 3 patients (2%), who had been initially classified as cured, developed pathological basal Ctn levels during the follow-up period. This was much lower than previously reported: 5% to 21% (11, 20–28) of patients with MTC postoperatively had achieved an initial biochemical cure but later developed biochemical recurrence. This might have resulted from differences in sensitivity and specificity and that the different Ctn assays used formerly were not directly comparable. Also, it could not be ruled out that a small proportion in our cohort with long-term biochemical cure might develop biochemical recurrence eventually.

The results from the present study showed that patients with stage I and II MTC without regional lymph node metastases will have 100% survival. This could likely be explained by the high rate of biochemical cure in this subgroup. Also, six patients in our cohort with lymph node-positive MTC achieved long-term biochemical cure. In these patients, the number of metastatic lymph nodes did not exceed four. Corresponding trends have been demonstrated in institutional series (29–32).

In contrast, 9% of all patients died: 7% of MOD patients and 7% of H patients but 33% of HST patients (mostly with stage III and IV). The DSS of the patients with MTC is strongly dependent on their tumor stage and age at diagnosis. This has been well recognized for decades (16, 18, 25, 33–35) and was confirmed in the present study. However, the significance of biological sex as an independent prognostic factor remains controversial (18, 25, 33–35). In the present study, sex was not a predictor of adverse outcomes (P = 0.3669). Concerning the tumor stage, comparisons with other studies would be complicated because of the application of different staging systems and, thus, hindering reasonable conclusions (17, 36–38).

Study limitations

The retrospective nature of the present study carried the limitations that reflect the heterogeneity in patient management during the previous four decades. The operation techniques have changed, the quality of data has changed, data were missing, and no systematic follow-up evaluations had been performed for all the patients. For optimal assessment of DSS among the MTC subgroups, all risk groups should be preferably followed up until all the patients had died in one of the cohorts. However, owing to the slow growth of these tumors with a 20-year survival rate of 80% to 90%, such follow-up evaluations could potentially span more than 50 years. The median follow-up time in the present study was 12.9 years (9 to 16 years for the different risk groups), longer than any comparable reported study. The sample size especially for the rare HST group was much lower than that for the H and MOD groups. A larger sample size and/or longer follow-up might have provided more events and, thus, greater statistical strength. Nevertheless, substantial differences could be shown.

Conclusion

We found that patients with MEN2A carrying mutations classified as MOD and H will have a different onset of disease but similar tumor aggressiveness, survival, and outcomes. Once MTC has developed, the clinical course will be equivalent in these two risk groups, with the same aggressiveness. This has important implications: patients in the MOD group should be followed up as intensively as patients in the H group to enable an early diagnosis and enable cure through early thyroidectomy. Patients with MEN2B, classified as HST, will have the earliest onset of MTC and inferior survival and outcomes compared with patients with MEN2A. Thus, MEN2B is a distinct clinical entity with its own phenotype and a different prognosis.

Acknowledgments

Disclosure Summary: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Data Availability:

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article or in the data repositories listed in the References.

Abbreviations:

    Abbreviations:
     
  • ATA

    American Thyroid Association

  •  
  • Ctn

    calcitonin

  •  
  • DSS

    disease-specific survival

  •  
  • H

    high risk

  •  
  • HR

    hazard ratio

  •  
  • HST

    highest risk

  •  
  • MEN2

    multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

  •  
  • MOD

    moderate risk

  •  
  • MTC

    medullary thyroid carcinoma

References

1.

Krampitz
GW
,
Norton
JA
.
RET gene mutations (genotype and phenotype) of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma
.
Cancer
.
2014
;
120
(
13
):
1920
1931
.

2.

Wells
SA
Jr,
Asa
SL
,
Dralle
H
,
Elisei
R
,
Evans
DB
,
Gagel
RF
,
Lee
N
,
Machens
A
,
Moley
JF
,
Pacini
F
,
Raue
F
,
Frank-Raue
K
,
Robinson
B
,
Rosenthal
MS
,
Santoro
M
,
Schlumberger
M
,
Shah
M
,
Waguespack
SG
;
American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma
.
Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma
.
Thyroid
.
2015
;
25
(
6
):
567
610
.

3.

Raue
F
,
Frank-Raue
K
.
Update on multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: focus on medullary thyroid carcinoma
.
J Endocr Soc
.
2018
;
2
(
8
):
933
943
.

4.

Wells
SA
Jr,
Pacini
F
,
Robinson
BG
,
Santoro
M
.
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma: an update
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2013
;
98
(
8
):
3149
3164
.

5.

Long
KL
,
Etzel
C
,
Rich
T
,
Hyde
S
,
Perrier
ND
,
Graham
PH
,
Lee
JE
,
Hu
MI
,
Cote
GJ
,
Gagel
R
,
Grubbs
EG
.
All in the family? Analyzing the impact of family history in addition to genotype on medullary thyroid carcinoma aggressiveness in MEN2A patients
.
Fam Cancer
.
2017
;
16
(
2
):
283
289
.

6.

Raue
F
,
Dralle
H
,
Machens
A
,
Bruckner
T
,
Frank-Raue
K
.
Long-term survivorship in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2b diagnosed before and in the new millennium
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2018
;
103
(
1
):
235
243
.

7.

Castinetti
F
,
Waguespack
SG
,
Machens
A
,
Uchino
S
,
Hasse-Lazar
K
,
Sanso
G
,
Else
T
,
Dvorakova
S
,
Qi
XP
,
Elisei
R
,
Maia
AL
,
Glod
J
,
Lourenço
DM
Jr
,
Valdes
N
,
Mathiesen
J
,
Wohllk
N
,
Bandgar
TR
,
Drui
D
,
Korbonits
M
,
Druce
MR
,
Brain
C
,
Kurzawinski
T
,
Patocs
A
,
Bugalho
MJ
,
Lacroix
A
,
Caron
P
,
Fainstein-Day
P
,
Borson Chazot
F
,
Klein
M
,
Links
TP
,
Letizia
C
,
Fugazzola
L
,
Chabre
O
,
Canu
L
,
Cohen
R
,
Tabarin
A
,
Spehar Uroic
A
,
Maiter
D
,
Laboureau
S
,
Mian
C
,
Peczkowska
M
,
Sebag
F
,
Brue
T
,
Mirebeau-Prunier
D
,
Leclerc
L
,
Bausch
B
,
Berdelou
A
,
Sukurai
A
,
Vlcek
P
,
Krajewska
J
,
Barontini
M
,
Vaz Ferreira Vargas
C
,
Valerio
L
,
Ceolin
L
,
Akshintala
S
,
Hoff
A
,
Godballe
C
,
Jarzab
B
,
Jimenez
C
,
Eng
C
,
Imai
T
,
Schlumberger
M
,
Grubbs
E
,
Dralle
H
,
Neumann
HP
,
Baudin
E
.
Natural history, treatment, and long-term follow up of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B: an international, multicentre, retrospective study
.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
.
2019
;
7
(
3
):
213
220
.

8.

Voss
RK
,
Feng
L
,
Lee
JE
,
Perrier
ND
,
Graham
PH
,
Hyde
SM
,
Nieves-Munoz
F
,
Cabanillas
ME
,
Waguespack
SG
,
Cote
GJ
,
Gagel
RF
,
Grubbs
EG
.
Medullary thyroid carcinoma in MEN2A: ATA moderate- or high-risk RET mutations do not predict disease aggressiveness
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2017
;
102
(
8
):
2807
2813
.

9.

Brandi
ML
,
Gagel
RF
,
Angeli
A
,
Bilezikian
JP
,
Beck-Peccoz
P
,
Bordi
C
,
Conte-Devolx
B
,
Falchetti
A
,
Gheri
RG
,
Libroia
A
,
Lips
CJ
,
Lombardi
G
,
Mannelli
M
,
Pacini
F
,
Ponder
BA
,
Raue
F
,
Skogseid
B
,
Tamburrano
G
,
Thakker
RV
,
Thompson
NW
,
Tomassetti
P
,
Tonelli
F
,
Wells
SA
Jr
,
Marx
SJ
.
Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2001
;
86
(
12
):
5658
5671
.

10.

Edge
SB
,
Compton
CC
.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM
.
Ann Surg Oncol
.
2010
;
17
:
1471
1474
.

11.

Lindsey
SC
,
Ganly
I
,
Palmer
F
,
Tuttle
RM
.
Response to initial therapy predicts clinical outcomes in medullary thyroid cancer
.
Thyroid
.
2015
;
25
(
2
):
242
249
.

12.

Adam
MA
,
Thomas
S
,
Roman
SA
,
Hyslop
T
,
Sosa
JA
.
Rethinking the current American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for medullary thyroid cancer
.
JAMA Surg
.
2017
;
152
(
9
):
869
876
.

13.

Roman
S
,
Lin
R
,
Sosa
JA
.
Prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma: demographic, clinical, and pathologic predictors of survival in 1252 cases
.
Cancer
.
2006
;
107
(
9
):
2134
2142
.

14.

Machens
A
,
Lorenz
K
,
Dralle
H
.
Progression of medullary thyroid cancer in RET carriers of ATA class A and C mutations
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2014
;
99
(
2
):
E286
E292
.

15.

Machens
A
,
Lorenz
K
,
Weber
F
,
Dralle
H
.
Genotype-specific progression of hereditary medullary thyroid cancer
.
Hum Mutat
.
2018
;
39
(
6
):
860
869
.

16.

Kuo
EJ
,
Sho
S
,
Li
N
,
Zanocco
KA
,
Yeh
MW
,
Livhits
MJ
.
Risk factors associated with reoperation and disease-specific mortality in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma
.
JAMA Surg
.
2018
;
153
(
1
):
52
59
.

17.

Bergholm
U
,
Bergström
R
,
Ekbom
A
.
Long-term follow-up of patients with medullary carcinoma of the thyroid
.
Cancer
.
1997
;
79
(
1
):
132
138
.

18.

Raue
F
.
German medullary thyroid carcinoma/multiple endocrine neoplasia registry. German MTC/MEN Study Group. Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma/Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2
.
Langenbecks Arch Surg
.
1998
;
383
(
5
):
334
336
.

19.

Randle
RW
,
Balentine
CJ
,
Leverson
GE
,
Havlena
JA
,
Sippel
RS
,
Schneider
DF
,
Pitt
SC
.
Trends in the presentation, treatment, and survival of patients with medullary thyroid cancer over the past 30 years
.
Surgery
.
2017
;
161
(
1
):
137
146
.

20.

Momin
S
,
Chute
D
,
Burkey
B
,
Scharpf
J
.
Prognostic variables affecting primary treatment outcome for medullary thyroid cancer
.
Endocr Pract
.
2017
;
23
(
9
):
1053
1058
.

21.

Simões-Pereira
J
,
Bugalho
MJ
,
Limbert
E
,
Leite
V
.
Retrospective analysis of 140 cases of medullary thyroid carcinoma followed-up in a single institution
.
Oncol Lett
.
2016
;
11
(
6
):
3870
3874
.

22.

Siironen
P
,
Hagstrom
J
,
Maenpaa
HO
,
Louhimo
J
,
Arola
J
,
Haglund
C
.
Lymph node metastases and elevated postoperative calcitonin: predictors of poor survival in medullary thyroid carcinoma
.
Acta Oncol
.
2016
;
55
(
3
):
357
364
.

23.

Alevizaki
M
,
Saltiki
K
,
Rentziou
G
,
Papathoma
A
,
Sarika
L
,
Vasileiou
V
,
Anastasiou
E.
Medullary thyroid carcinoma: the influence of policy changing in clinical characteristics and disease progression
.
Eur J Endocrinol
.
2012
;
167
:
799
808
.

24.

Brandão
LG
,
Cavalheiro
BG
,
Junqueira
CR
.
Prognostic influence of clinical and pathological factors in medullary thyroid carcinoma: a study of 53 cases
.
Clinics (São Paulo)
.
2009
;
64
(
9
):
849
856
.

25.

Modigliani
E
,
Cohen
R
,
Campos
JM
,
Conte-Devolx
B
,
Maes
B
,
Boneu
A
,
Schlumberger
M
,
Bigorgne
JC
,
Dumontier
P
,
Leclerc
L
,
Corcuff
B
,
Guilhem
I
.
Prognostic factors for survival and for biochemical cure in medullary thyroid carcinoma: results in 899 patients. The GETC Study Group. Groupe d’étude des tumeurs à calcitonine
.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
.
1998
;
48
(
3
):
265
273
.

26.

Kwon
H
,
Kim
WG
,
Jeon
MJ
,
Song
DE
,
Lee
YM
,
Sung
TY
,
Chung
KW
,
Yoon
JH
,
Hong
SJ
,
Baek
JH
,
Lee
JH
,
Kim
TY
,
Kim
WB
,
Shong
YK
.
Dynamic risk stratification for medullary thyroid cancer according to the response to initial therapy
.
Endocrine
.
2016
;
53
(
1
):
174
181
.

27.

Cho
YY
,
Jang
HW
,
Jang
JY
,
Kim
TH
,
Choe
JH
,
Kim
JH
,
Kim
JS
,
Kim
SW
,
Chung
JH
.
Clinical outcomes of patients with hypercalcitoninemia after initial treatment for medullary thyroid cancer and postoperative serum calcitonin cutoffs for predicting structural recurrence
.
Head Neck
.
2016
;
38
(
10
):
1501
1508
.

28.

Pellegriti
G
,
Leboulleux
S
,
Baudin
E
,
Bellon
N
,
Scollo
C
,
Travagli
JP
,
Schlumberger
M
.
Long-term outcome of medullary thyroid carcinoma in patients with normal postoperative medical imaging
.
Br J Cancer
.
2003
;
88
(
10
):
1537
1542
.

29.

Machens
A
,
Schneyer
U
,
Holzhausen
HJ
,
Dralle
H
.
Prospects of remission in medullary thyroid carcinoma according to basal calcitonin level
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2005
;
90
(
4
):
2029
2034
.

30.

Weber
T
,
Schilling
T
,
Frank-Raue
K
,
Colombo-Benkmann
M
,
Hinz
U
,
Ziegler
R
,
Klar
E
.
Impact of modified radical neck dissection on biochemical cure in medullary thyroid carcinomas
.
Surgery
.
2001
;
130
(
6
):
1044
1049
.

31.

Machens
A
,
Gimm
O
,
Ukkat
J
,
Hinze
R
,
Schneyer
U
,
Dralle
H
.
Improved prediction of calcitonin normalization in medullary thyroid carcinoma patients by quantitative lymph node analysis
.
Cancer
.
2000
;
88
(
8
):
1909
1915
.

32.

Scollo
C
,
Baudin
E
,
Travagli
JP
,
Caillou
B
,
Bellon
N
,
Leboulleux
S
,
Schlumberger
M
.
Rationale for central and bilateral lymph node dissection in sporadic and hereditary medullary thyroid cancer
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2003
;
88
(
5
):
2070
2075
.

33.

Randle
RW
,
Bates
MF
,
Schneider
DF
,
Sippel
RS
,
Pitt
SC
.
Survival in patients with medullary thyroid cancer after less than the recommended initial operation
.
J Surg Oncol
.
2018
;
117
(
6
):
1211
1216
.

34.

Cox
C
,
Chen
Y
,
Cress
R
,
Semrad
AM
,
Semrad
T
,
Gosnell
JE
,
Campbell
MJ
.
Are there disparities in the presentation, treatment and outcomes of patients diagnosed with medullary thyroid cancer?—An analysis of 634 patients from the California Cancer Registry
.
Gland Surg
.
2016
;
5
(
4
):
398
404
.

35.

Raue
F
,
Kotzerke
J
,
Reinwein
D
,
Schröder
S
,
Röher
HD
,
Deckart
H
,
Höfer
R
,
Ritter
M
,
Seif
F
,
Buhr
H
,
Beyer
J
,
Schober
O
,
Becker
W
,
Neumann
H
,
Calvi
J
,
Winter
J
,
Vogt
H
.
Prognostic factors in medullary thyroid carcinoma: evaluation of 741 patients from the German Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Register
.
Clin Investig
.
1993
;
71
(
1
):
7
12
.

36.

Bergholm
U
,
Adami
HO
,
Bergström
R
,
Bäckdahl
M
,
Akerström
G
;
the Swedish MTC Study Group
.
Long-term survival in sporadic and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma with special reference to clinical characteristics as prognostic factors
.
Acta Chir Scand
.
1990
;
156
(
1
):
37
46
.

37.

Gilliland
FD
,
Hunt
WC
,
Morris
DM
,
Key
CR
.
Prognostic factors for thyroid carcinoma: a population-based study of 15,698 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program 1973-1991
.
Cancer
.
1997
;
79
(
3
):
564
573
.

38.

Hundahl
SA
,
Fleming
ID
,
Fremgen
AM
,
Menck
HR
.
A National Cancer Data Base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the U.S., 1985-1995
.
Cancer
.
1998
;
83
(
12
):
2638
2648
.