Abstract

Context

The relationship between carbohydrate quality intake and metabolic syndrome (MetS) is of growing interest.

Objective

We aimed to assess the association between the adherence to a dietary carbohydrate quality index (CQI) with the occurrence of MetS in a Spanish cohort of working adults.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted of 2316 middle-aged men, aged 50.9 (SD 3.9) years, with no previous cardiovascular disease, and pertaining to the Aragon Workers’ Health Study (AWHS) cohort. Diet was collected with a 136-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire. The CQI (range 4-15) was based on: dietary fiber intake, a low glycemic index, the ratio of whole grains/total grains, and the ratio of solid carbohydrates/total carbohydrates. The higher the CQI, the healthier the diet. MetS was defined by using the harmonized National Cholesterol Education Programme–Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) definition. The associations across 3-point categories of the CQI and the presence of MetS were examined using logistic regression.

Results

An inverse and significant association between the CQI and MetS was found. Fully adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for MetS risk among participants in the 10- to 12-point category (second highest CQI category) was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94), and in the 13- to 15-point category (highest category) was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.30-0.88), when compared with the 4- to 6-point category (lowest category). Participants with 10 to 12 and 13 to 15 points on the CQI showed a lower risk of hypertriglyceridemia: OR 0.61 (95% CI, 0.46-0.81), and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.32-0.71) respectively.

Conclusion

Among middle-aged men, a higher adherence to a high-quality carbohydrate diet is associated with a lower prevalence of MetS. Triglyceridemia is the MetS component that contributed the most to this reduced risk.

The prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) is on the rise worldwide, becoming a public health concern (1). MetS is a condition that includes a cluster of risk factors, such as high waist circumference, high blood pressure, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and high plasma glucose. MetS has been linked to the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) (2, 3). The increase in the occurrence of MetS has been attributed to the rise in obesity, which in turn is associated with a sedentary lifestyle (1) as well as with poor dietary habits (4, 5). Therefore, efforts to prevent MetS in the public health arena have focused on promoting healthy lifestyles, including a healthy diet (2, 6).

A high-quality carbohydrate diet is now considered to be healthy and favorable. Thus, improving the quality of carbohydrate intake seems to be more beneficial than reducing their quantity (7). Carbohydrate quality is a multidimensional entity that integrates several parameters and, as such, these parameters could act in a synergetic way (7, 8). Traditionally, there are some dietary parameters that were used to assess carbohydrate quality, such as fiber intake, whole-grain consumption, the glycemic index (GI), or the glycemic load. It has been shown that a higher intake of fiber and whole grain is associated with a lower risk of MetS (9-11), while the consumption of refined grain is positively associated with MetS (11). In the same way, a high dietary GI increases the risk of MetS (12, 13).

In recent years, authors have assessed the overall carbohydrate quality within a dietary pattern by elaborating a single index, known as the carbohydrate quality index (CQI). The first definition of the CQI was performed by Zazpe et al (14), allowing scientists to compare participants with different quality and quantity of carbohydrate intake, as well as to describe the role of carbohydrates as a group in disease development. High scores in this index are associated with lower cardiometabolic risk factors, such as obesity (15, 16), high waist circumference (17), high glycated hemoglobin A1c (18), and hypertension (15), which eventually could result in the occurrence of MetS. High CQI scores have also been associated with lower subclinical atherosclerosis (19) and CVD (20). Nevertheless, the scarce evidence about the association between the CQI and the occurrence of MetS have shown mixed results (15, 21). Therefore, we aim to study the association between the adherence to the CQI and the occurrence of MetS in a well-characterized Spanish sample of working adults.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Population

This is a cross-sectional study carried out with a subsample from the Aragon Workers’ Health Study (AWHS), whose design and methodology have been previously described (22). The AWHS is a prospective cohort with the aim to characterize risk factors for metabolic abnormalities and subclinical atherosclerosis, by performing annual physical examinations of 5678 workers belonging to an automobile assembly plant from Spain. Between 2011 and 2014, a total of 2617 participants aged 39 to 59 years and free from CVD at baseline, attended extended examinations that included an interview with questionnaires on diet and lifestyles. We excluded women due to their small number (n = 132), and those with missing data on diet or on the components of MetS (n = 169). The final sample comprised 2316 men (Supplementary Fig. S1) (23). The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the clinical research ethics committee of Aragon (CEICA) (PI07/09). All participants provided written informed consent.

Data Collection

Diet assessment and carbohydrate quality index calculation

The habitual diet over the year preceding the interview was assessed using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) previously validated in Spain (24). This questionnaire collects data on the frequency of the consumption of 136 food items, considering 9 frequencies from “never or almost never” to “more than six times a day.” Additionally, dietary energy, macronutrient, and micronutrient intake were derived by using Spanish food composition tables (25, 26).

We calculated the CQI (19) to assess an overall index for carbohydrate quality, considering the following components: 1) dietary fiber intake (g/d); 2) the GI; 3) whole-grain/total grain ratio; 4) and solid carbohydrate/total carbohydrate ratio. Dietary fiber intake was calculated according to the Spanish food composition tables. GI was calculated as a weighted GI that was based on the GI for each individual food that was obtained from Spanish food composition tables (25, 26), and using a previously defined formula (15). Whole-grain consumption was estimated as the sum of “whole bread consumption,” “integral cereal consumption,” and “whole wheat cookie consumption.” Total grain intake was calculated by summing up all types of grains, defined as the intake of whole grains, refined grains, and their products (including refined bread, refined breakfast cereal, white rice, refined pasta, pizza, and different biscuits, as well as pastry products). Liquid carbohydrates were calculated by summing up carbohydrates ingested from sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice. Solid carbohydrates accounted for the carbohydrate content from the rest of the foods.

Each component contributed to the score as follows (14): 1) For dietary fiber intake, participants were categorized into quartiles, and points were assigned from 1 to 4. Higher fiber intake increases the final score. 2) For GI, participants were categorized into quartiles, but points were assigned in reverse, from 4 to 1. Lower GI values increase the final score. 3) For the ratio of whole grains/total grains, participants were categorized into 3 groups. Those with no whole-grain consumption received 1 point, and the rest were divided into 2 equally sized groups and received 2 and 3 points. Thus, this component was categorized into 3 groups based on the low variability consumption of whole grains in the sample. Higher ratios increase the final score. 4) For the ratio of solid carbohydrate/total carbohydrate, participants were categorized into quartiles, and points were assigned from 1 to 4. Higher ratios increase the final score (Table 1).

Table 1.

Components and algorithm used to calculate the carbohydrate quality index

Components of CQIIndex range (points) (4-15)Scores according to groups of component (cutoff points)
Dietary fiber intake, g/d1-4G1 = 1 (0-20.1)G2 = 2 (20.1-24.4)G3 = 3 (24.4-29.3)G4 = 4 (29.3-max)
Glycemic index1-4G1 = 4 (0-48.8)G2 = 3 (48.8-51.9)G3 = 2 (51.9-54.0)G4 = 1 (54.0-max)
Ratio of whole grains/total grains1-3G1 = 1 0G2 = 2 (0, 0.246]G3 = 3 (0.246-max)
Ratio of solid carbohydrates/total carbohydrates1-4G1 = 1 (0-0.947)G2 = 2 (0.947-0.977)G3 = 3 (0.977-0.996)G4 = 4 (0.996-max)
Components of CQIIndex range (points) (4-15)Scores according to groups of component (cutoff points)
Dietary fiber intake, g/d1-4G1 = 1 (0-20.1)G2 = 2 (20.1-24.4)G3 = 3 (24.4-29.3)G4 = 4 (29.3-max)
Glycemic index1-4G1 = 4 (0-48.8)G2 = 3 (48.8-51.9)G3 = 2 (51.9-54.0)G4 = 1 (54.0-max)
Ratio of whole grains/total grains1-3G1 = 1 0G2 = 2 (0, 0.246]G3 = 3 (0.246-max)
Ratio of solid carbohydrates/total carbohydrates1-4G1 = 1 (0-0.947)G2 = 2 (0.947-0.977)G3 = 3 (0.977-0.996)G4 = 4 (0.996-max)

Abbreviations: CQI, carbohydrate quality index; G, group; Max, maximum.

Table 1.

Components and algorithm used to calculate the carbohydrate quality index

Components of CQIIndex range (points) (4-15)Scores according to groups of component (cutoff points)
Dietary fiber intake, g/d1-4G1 = 1 (0-20.1)G2 = 2 (20.1-24.4)G3 = 3 (24.4-29.3)G4 = 4 (29.3-max)
Glycemic index1-4G1 = 4 (0-48.8)G2 = 3 (48.8-51.9)G3 = 2 (51.9-54.0)G4 = 1 (54.0-max)
Ratio of whole grains/total grains1-3G1 = 1 0G2 = 2 (0, 0.246]G3 = 3 (0.246-max)
Ratio of solid carbohydrates/total carbohydrates1-4G1 = 1 (0-0.947)G2 = 2 (0.947-0.977)G3 = 3 (0.977-0.996)G4 = 4 (0.996-max)
Components of CQIIndex range (points) (4-15)Scores according to groups of component (cutoff points)
Dietary fiber intake, g/d1-4G1 = 1 (0-20.1)G2 = 2 (20.1-24.4)G3 = 3 (24.4-29.3)G4 = 4 (29.3-max)
Glycemic index1-4G1 = 4 (0-48.8)G2 = 3 (48.8-51.9)G3 = 2 (51.9-54.0)G4 = 1 (54.0-max)
Ratio of whole grains/total grains1-3G1 = 1 0G2 = 2 (0, 0.246]G3 = 3 (0.246-max)
Ratio of solid carbohydrates/total carbohydrates1-4G1 = 1 (0-0.947)G2 = 2 (0.947-0.977)G3 = 3 (0.977-0.996)G4 = 4 (0.996-max)

Abbreviations: CQI, carbohydrate quality index; G, group; Max, maximum.

Finally, the CQI was constructed by summing up all the component scores (ranging from 4 to 15). We classified participants into four 3-point intervals of this final score. Higher CQI values mean better quality of the carbohydrate consumed (see Table 1).

Metabolic syndrome definition

MetS was diagnosed, according to the modified National Cholesterol Education Program—Adult Treatment Panel III definition (NCEP-ATP III) (2), when participants met at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: elevated waist circumference (≥102 cm), elevated fasting blood glucose (≥100 mg/dL or receiving antidiabetic drugs), elevated blood pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mm Hg, or receiving antihypertensive drugs), elevated serum triglycerides (TGs) (≥150 mg/dL or being on drug treatment for hypertriglyceridemia), and reduced serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) (<40 mg/dL).

Sociodemographic, clinical, and biological data

Age, type of work (blue collar or white collar), physical examination, as well as laboratory data were obtained during the annual medical examination by using standardized procedures.

The physical examination included height, weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure measurements. Medical history and the current use of medication were also collected. Waist circumference was obtained by using a flexible, nonextendible measuring tape (GulicK model 67 109) that was verified and revised monthly vs another tape calibrated every 3 years. The measurements were taken in the middle point between the iliac crest and the lowest point of the costal margin on the midaxillary line in a horizontal plane (parallel to the ground), at the end of a nonforced exhale, with arms relaxed along the body and the legs slightly apart.

Laboratory data were obtained from fasting blood samples (>8 hours). Total cholesterol, HDL-c, TGs, and serum glucose were measured by spectrophotometry (Chemical Analyzer ILAB 650, Instrumentation Laboratory). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) was calculated using the Friedewald equation when TGs were lower than 400 mg/dL.

Lifestyles were obtained by interview. Participants were categorized as ever-smokers if they were “current smokers” (they reported having smoked in the last year) or “former smokers” (they had smoked at least 50 cigarettes in their lifetime, but not in the last year).

We assessed physical activity using the validated Spanish version (27) of the frequency of engaging in physical activity questionnaire, used in the Nurses’ Health Study (28) and in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (29). A metabolic value was assigned to each activity using the Ainsworth's compendium for physical activities (30), and was multiplied by the times the participant reported practicing it. We obtained a value for overall weekly metabolic equivalents-h by summing up all the activities.

Hypertension was defined as having systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 140 mm Hg, or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg, or self-reported use of antihypertensive medication (31). Diabetes was defined as fasting plasma greater than or equal to 126 mg/dL or self-reported treatment with hypoglycemic medication (31). Dyslipidemia was defined as having total cholesterol greater than or equal to 240 mg/dL, or LDL-c greater than or equal to 160 mg/dL, or HDL-c less than 40 mg/dL, or self-reported use of lipid-lowering drugs (3).

Statistical Methods/Analysis

The CQIs were categorized into 4 groups (4-6, 7-9, 10-12, and 13-15 points) and the association of MetS was examined by using logistic regression. The models were adjusted for age, type of work, body mass index derived from the weight and height of a person in kg/m2, smoking status, physical activity (total metabolic equivalents-h/week), hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, total energy intake, protein intake, total fat intake, and alcohol intake. The same analyses were performed for MetS criteria separately. R statistical software (ver. 4.1.3) was used, and P values below .05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The sample included 2316 men with a mean age of 50.9 (SD 3.9). Compared with individuals in the lowest CQI category, participants in the highest CQI category had higher concentrations of HDL-c, lower concentrations of TGs, and exerted more physical activity (Table 2).

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of Aragon Workers’ Health Study participants according to carbohydrate quality index categories

Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality)7-9 points10-12 points13-15 points (highest quality)
N = 2316Meann = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trend
Age, y50.9 (3.9)50.4 (4.2)51.0 (3.9)51.1 (3.8)51.0 (3.6).058
Type of work, white collar % (n)12.0 (277)10.8 (36)10.3 (107)14.4 (107)13.6 (27).028
BMI27.9 (3.5)27.6 (3.6)27.9 (3.5)28.0 (3.4)27.9 (3.5).292
Waist circumference, cm98.0 (9.3)97.5 (9.2)98.4 (9.3)97.9 (9.4)97.2 (8.9).623
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg125.6 (14.0)125.1 (13.9)126.0 (13.7)124.9 (14.2)126.3 (15.3).980
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg82.7 (9.5)82.8 (9.5)83.0 (9.2)82.3 (9.6)83.0 (10.1).570
Total cholesterol, mg/dL220.1 (36.3)220.1 (39.3)218.7 (34.6)222.1 (36.5)219.7 (38.2).351
HDL-c, mg/dL52.8 (11.4)51.7 (10.7)51.7 (10.9)54.5 (11.8)54.6 (12.1)<.001
Non–HDL-c, mg/dL167.2 (35.0)168.4 (38.2)167.0 (33.3)167.6 (35.4)165.1 (37.4).511
LDL-c, mg/dL137.9 (31.4)137.4 (34.2)137.2 (30.6)138.8 (30.7)139.3 (33.4).285
Triglycerides, mg/dL151.8 (98.9)157.1 (91.0)155.7 (108.1)146.8 (88.6)140.9 (97.5).013
Fasting glucose, mg/dL98.0 (17.8)96.7 (16.1)97.9 (18.7)98.2 (16.9)99.4 (18.9).094
Ever-smokers, % (n)76.7 (1776)78.4 (262)77.9 (809)74.5 (555)75.8 (150).126
Physical activity, total METs-h/wk32.3 (23.0)27.6 (20.8)31.8 (22.2)34.9 (24.5)33.4 (23.9)<.001
Hypertension, % (n)38.7 (896)36.2 (121)39.0 (405)38.5 (287)41.9 (83).308
Dyslipidemia, % (n)49.4 (1145)49.7 (166)48.7 (506)49.5 (369)52.5 (104).546
Diabetes, % (n)5.8 (135)4.5 (15)6.0 (62)5.5 (41)8.6 (17).167
Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality)7-9 points10-12 points13-15 points (highest quality)
N = 2316Meann = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trend
Age, y50.9 (3.9)50.4 (4.2)51.0 (3.9)51.1 (3.8)51.0 (3.6).058
Type of work, white collar % (n)12.0 (277)10.8 (36)10.3 (107)14.4 (107)13.6 (27).028
BMI27.9 (3.5)27.6 (3.6)27.9 (3.5)28.0 (3.4)27.9 (3.5).292
Waist circumference, cm98.0 (9.3)97.5 (9.2)98.4 (9.3)97.9 (9.4)97.2 (8.9).623
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg125.6 (14.0)125.1 (13.9)126.0 (13.7)124.9 (14.2)126.3 (15.3).980
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg82.7 (9.5)82.8 (9.5)83.0 (9.2)82.3 (9.6)83.0 (10.1).570
Total cholesterol, mg/dL220.1 (36.3)220.1 (39.3)218.7 (34.6)222.1 (36.5)219.7 (38.2).351
HDL-c, mg/dL52.8 (11.4)51.7 (10.7)51.7 (10.9)54.5 (11.8)54.6 (12.1)<.001
Non–HDL-c, mg/dL167.2 (35.0)168.4 (38.2)167.0 (33.3)167.6 (35.4)165.1 (37.4).511
LDL-c, mg/dL137.9 (31.4)137.4 (34.2)137.2 (30.6)138.8 (30.7)139.3 (33.4).285
Triglycerides, mg/dL151.8 (98.9)157.1 (91.0)155.7 (108.1)146.8 (88.6)140.9 (97.5).013
Fasting glucose, mg/dL98.0 (17.8)96.7 (16.1)97.9 (18.7)98.2 (16.9)99.4 (18.9).094
Ever-smokers, % (n)76.7 (1776)78.4 (262)77.9 (809)74.5 (555)75.8 (150).126
Physical activity, total METs-h/wk32.3 (23.0)27.6 (20.8)31.8 (22.2)34.9 (24.5)33.4 (23.9)<.001
Hypertension, % (n)38.7 (896)36.2 (121)39.0 (405)38.5 (287)41.9 (83).308
Dyslipidemia, % (n)49.4 (1145)49.7 (166)48.7 (506)49.5 (369)52.5 (104).546
Diabetes, % (n)5.8 (135)4.5 (15)6.0 (62)5.5 (41)8.6 (17).167

Values are mean (SD) or % (number). P value for trend from unadjusted regression models.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MET, metabolic equivalent; Non–HDL-c: non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of Aragon Workers’ Health Study participants according to carbohydrate quality index categories

Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality)7-9 points10-12 points13-15 points (highest quality)
N = 2316Meann = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trend
Age, y50.9 (3.9)50.4 (4.2)51.0 (3.9)51.1 (3.8)51.0 (3.6).058
Type of work, white collar % (n)12.0 (277)10.8 (36)10.3 (107)14.4 (107)13.6 (27).028
BMI27.9 (3.5)27.6 (3.6)27.9 (3.5)28.0 (3.4)27.9 (3.5).292
Waist circumference, cm98.0 (9.3)97.5 (9.2)98.4 (9.3)97.9 (9.4)97.2 (8.9).623
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg125.6 (14.0)125.1 (13.9)126.0 (13.7)124.9 (14.2)126.3 (15.3).980
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg82.7 (9.5)82.8 (9.5)83.0 (9.2)82.3 (9.6)83.0 (10.1).570
Total cholesterol, mg/dL220.1 (36.3)220.1 (39.3)218.7 (34.6)222.1 (36.5)219.7 (38.2).351
HDL-c, mg/dL52.8 (11.4)51.7 (10.7)51.7 (10.9)54.5 (11.8)54.6 (12.1)<.001
Non–HDL-c, mg/dL167.2 (35.0)168.4 (38.2)167.0 (33.3)167.6 (35.4)165.1 (37.4).511
LDL-c, mg/dL137.9 (31.4)137.4 (34.2)137.2 (30.6)138.8 (30.7)139.3 (33.4).285
Triglycerides, mg/dL151.8 (98.9)157.1 (91.0)155.7 (108.1)146.8 (88.6)140.9 (97.5).013
Fasting glucose, mg/dL98.0 (17.8)96.7 (16.1)97.9 (18.7)98.2 (16.9)99.4 (18.9).094
Ever-smokers, % (n)76.7 (1776)78.4 (262)77.9 (809)74.5 (555)75.8 (150).126
Physical activity, total METs-h/wk32.3 (23.0)27.6 (20.8)31.8 (22.2)34.9 (24.5)33.4 (23.9)<.001
Hypertension, % (n)38.7 (896)36.2 (121)39.0 (405)38.5 (287)41.9 (83).308
Dyslipidemia, % (n)49.4 (1145)49.7 (166)48.7 (506)49.5 (369)52.5 (104).546
Diabetes, % (n)5.8 (135)4.5 (15)6.0 (62)5.5 (41)8.6 (17).167
Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality)7-9 points10-12 points13-15 points (highest quality)
N = 2316Meann = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trend
Age, y50.9 (3.9)50.4 (4.2)51.0 (3.9)51.1 (3.8)51.0 (3.6).058
Type of work, white collar % (n)12.0 (277)10.8 (36)10.3 (107)14.4 (107)13.6 (27).028
BMI27.9 (3.5)27.6 (3.6)27.9 (3.5)28.0 (3.4)27.9 (3.5).292
Waist circumference, cm98.0 (9.3)97.5 (9.2)98.4 (9.3)97.9 (9.4)97.2 (8.9).623
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg125.6 (14.0)125.1 (13.9)126.0 (13.7)124.9 (14.2)126.3 (15.3).980
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg82.7 (9.5)82.8 (9.5)83.0 (9.2)82.3 (9.6)83.0 (10.1).570
Total cholesterol, mg/dL220.1 (36.3)220.1 (39.3)218.7 (34.6)222.1 (36.5)219.7 (38.2).351
HDL-c, mg/dL52.8 (11.4)51.7 (10.7)51.7 (10.9)54.5 (11.8)54.6 (12.1)<.001
Non–HDL-c, mg/dL167.2 (35.0)168.4 (38.2)167.0 (33.3)167.6 (35.4)165.1 (37.4).511
LDL-c, mg/dL137.9 (31.4)137.4 (34.2)137.2 (30.6)138.8 (30.7)139.3 (33.4).285
Triglycerides, mg/dL151.8 (98.9)157.1 (91.0)155.7 (108.1)146.8 (88.6)140.9 (97.5).013
Fasting glucose, mg/dL98.0 (17.8)96.7 (16.1)97.9 (18.7)98.2 (16.9)99.4 (18.9).094
Ever-smokers, % (n)76.7 (1776)78.4 (262)77.9 (809)74.5 (555)75.8 (150).126
Physical activity, total METs-h/wk32.3 (23.0)27.6 (20.8)31.8 (22.2)34.9 (24.5)33.4 (23.9)<.001
Hypertension, % (n)38.7 (896)36.2 (121)39.0 (405)38.5 (287)41.9 (83).308
Dyslipidemia, % (n)49.4 (1145)49.7 (166)48.7 (506)49.5 (369)52.5 (104).546
Diabetes, % (n)5.8 (135)4.5 (15)6.0 (62)5.5 (41)8.6 (17).167

Values are mean (SD) or % (number). P value for trend from unadjusted regression models.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MET, metabolic equivalent; Non–HDL-c: non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Concerning diet, participants with higher CQI consumed fewer carbohydrates and trans-fatty acids, while consuming more protein and alcohol than participants with lower CQI. (Table 3).

Table 3.

Nutritional baseline characteristics of Aragon Workers’ Health Study participants according to carbohydrate quality index categories

Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality)7-9 points10-12 points13-15 points (highest quality)
N = 2316Overalln = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trend
Total energy, kcal/d2915.1 (731.3)2814.5 (618.9)2973.8 (738.2)2909.1 (775.2)2799.9 (669.5).570
Carbohydrates, g/d333.0 (107.3)334.2 (90.2)344.3 (111.0)324.9 (110.9)302.3 (90.6)<.001
Protein, g/d108.5 (25.4)101.2 (21.8)109.0 (25.7)110.2 (25.8)112.2 (25.8)<.001
Total fat, g/d111.2 (29.0)106.1 (24.8)112.5 (29.2)112.0 (30.4)110.1 (28.5).116
Monounsaturated fatty acids, g/d50.8 (13.7)48.4 (11.3)51.4 (13.8)51.5 (14.4)49.4 (13.9).17
Polyunsaturated fatty acids, g/d18.4 (6.7)17.6 (6.3)18.8 (6.7)18.3 (6.8)18.6 (6.5).363
Saturated fatty acids, g/d32.5 (10.8)31.9 (9.5)33.1 (10.8)32.3 (11.2)31.2 (10.8).247
Trans-saturated fatty acids, g/d.9 (0.5)0.9 (0.4)0.9 (0.5)0.8 (0.5)0.7 (0.5)<.001
Alcohol intake, g/d21.2 (19.8)16.8 (17.6)21.2 (19.1)23.0 (21.3)21.6 (20.4)<.001
Dietary fiber, g/d25.5 (8.0)19.4 (4.0)23.9 (6.7)28.2 (7.9)34.2 (8.3)<.001
Glycemic index50.8 (4.7)54.2 (2.0)52.1 (3.5)48.8 (4.9)45.5 (4.5)<.001
Solid carbohydrates, g/d320.6 (103.9)308.6 (84.2)331.0 (107.5)316.8 (108.8)299.8 (89.7).091
Liquid carbohydrates, g/d12.4 (15.8)25.6 (20.7)13.2 (14.8)8.1 (12.2)2.5 (3.9)<.001
Whole grains, g/d28.5 (61.6)0.6 (4.8)6.9 (29.6)44.9 (66.7)127.3 (92.1)<.001
Total grains, g/d282.6 (137.2)284.0 (119.5)298.1 (142.1)268.8 (138.2)251.4 (124.8)<.001
Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality)7-9 points10-12 points13-15 points (highest quality)
N = 2316Overalln = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trend
Total energy, kcal/d2915.1 (731.3)2814.5 (618.9)2973.8 (738.2)2909.1 (775.2)2799.9 (669.5).570
Carbohydrates, g/d333.0 (107.3)334.2 (90.2)344.3 (111.0)324.9 (110.9)302.3 (90.6)<.001
Protein, g/d108.5 (25.4)101.2 (21.8)109.0 (25.7)110.2 (25.8)112.2 (25.8)<.001
Total fat, g/d111.2 (29.0)106.1 (24.8)112.5 (29.2)112.0 (30.4)110.1 (28.5).116
Monounsaturated fatty acids, g/d50.8 (13.7)48.4 (11.3)51.4 (13.8)51.5 (14.4)49.4 (13.9).17
Polyunsaturated fatty acids, g/d18.4 (6.7)17.6 (6.3)18.8 (6.7)18.3 (6.8)18.6 (6.5).363
Saturated fatty acids, g/d32.5 (10.8)31.9 (9.5)33.1 (10.8)32.3 (11.2)31.2 (10.8).247
Trans-saturated fatty acids, g/d.9 (0.5)0.9 (0.4)0.9 (0.5)0.8 (0.5)0.7 (0.5)<.001
Alcohol intake, g/d21.2 (19.8)16.8 (17.6)21.2 (19.1)23.0 (21.3)21.6 (20.4)<.001
Dietary fiber, g/d25.5 (8.0)19.4 (4.0)23.9 (6.7)28.2 (7.9)34.2 (8.3)<.001
Glycemic index50.8 (4.7)54.2 (2.0)52.1 (3.5)48.8 (4.9)45.5 (4.5)<.001
Solid carbohydrates, g/d320.6 (103.9)308.6 (84.2)331.0 (107.5)316.8 (108.8)299.8 (89.7).091
Liquid carbohydrates, g/d12.4 (15.8)25.6 (20.7)13.2 (14.8)8.1 (12.2)2.5 (3.9)<.001
Whole grains, g/d28.5 (61.6)0.6 (4.8)6.9 (29.6)44.9 (66.7)127.3 (92.1)<.001
Total grains, g/d282.6 (137.2)284.0 (119.5)298.1 (142.1)268.8 (138.2)251.4 (124.8)<.001

Values are mean (SD) or % (number). P value for trend from unadjusted regression models.

Table 3.

Nutritional baseline characteristics of Aragon Workers’ Health Study participants according to carbohydrate quality index categories

Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality)7-9 points10-12 points13-15 points (highest quality)
N = 2316Overalln = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trend
Total energy, kcal/d2915.1 (731.3)2814.5 (618.9)2973.8 (738.2)2909.1 (775.2)2799.9 (669.5).570
Carbohydrates, g/d333.0 (107.3)334.2 (90.2)344.3 (111.0)324.9 (110.9)302.3 (90.6)<.001
Protein, g/d108.5 (25.4)101.2 (21.8)109.0 (25.7)110.2 (25.8)112.2 (25.8)<.001
Total fat, g/d111.2 (29.0)106.1 (24.8)112.5 (29.2)112.0 (30.4)110.1 (28.5).116
Monounsaturated fatty acids, g/d50.8 (13.7)48.4 (11.3)51.4 (13.8)51.5 (14.4)49.4 (13.9).17
Polyunsaturated fatty acids, g/d18.4 (6.7)17.6 (6.3)18.8 (6.7)18.3 (6.8)18.6 (6.5).363
Saturated fatty acids, g/d32.5 (10.8)31.9 (9.5)33.1 (10.8)32.3 (11.2)31.2 (10.8).247
Trans-saturated fatty acids, g/d.9 (0.5)0.9 (0.4)0.9 (0.5)0.8 (0.5)0.7 (0.5)<.001
Alcohol intake, g/d21.2 (19.8)16.8 (17.6)21.2 (19.1)23.0 (21.3)21.6 (20.4)<.001
Dietary fiber, g/d25.5 (8.0)19.4 (4.0)23.9 (6.7)28.2 (7.9)34.2 (8.3)<.001
Glycemic index50.8 (4.7)54.2 (2.0)52.1 (3.5)48.8 (4.9)45.5 (4.5)<.001
Solid carbohydrates, g/d320.6 (103.9)308.6 (84.2)331.0 (107.5)316.8 (108.8)299.8 (89.7).091
Liquid carbohydrates, g/d12.4 (15.8)25.6 (20.7)13.2 (14.8)8.1 (12.2)2.5 (3.9)<.001
Whole grains, g/d28.5 (61.6)0.6 (4.8)6.9 (29.6)44.9 (66.7)127.3 (92.1)<.001
Total grains, g/d282.6 (137.2)284.0 (119.5)298.1 (142.1)268.8 (138.2)251.4 (124.8)<.001
Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality)7-9 points10-12 points13-15 points (highest quality)
N = 2316Overalln = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trend
Total energy, kcal/d2915.1 (731.3)2814.5 (618.9)2973.8 (738.2)2909.1 (775.2)2799.9 (669.5).570
Carbohydrates, g/d333.0 (107.3)334.2 (90.2)344.3 (111.0)324.9 (110.9)302.3 (90.6)<.001
Protein, g/d108.5 (25.4)101.2 (21.8)109.0 (25.7)110.2 (25.8)112.2 (25.8)<.001
Total fat, g/d111.2 (29.0)106.1 (24.8)112.5 (29.2)112.0 (30.4)110.1 (28.5).116
Monounsaturated fatty acids, g/d50.8 (13.7)48.4 (11.3)51.4 (13.8)51.5 (14.4)49.4 (13.9).17
Polyunsaturated fatty acids, g/d18.4 (6.7)17.6 (6.3)18.8 (6.7)18.3 (6.8)18.6 (6.5).363
Saturated fatty acids, g/d32.5 (10.8)31.9 (9.5)33.1 (10.8)32.3 (11.2)31.2 (10.8).247
Trans-saturated fatty acids, g/d.9 (0.5)0.9 (0.4)0.9 (0.5)0.8 (0.5)0.7 (0.5)<.001
Alcohol intake, g/d21.2 (19.8)16.8 (17.6)21.2 (19.1)23.0 (21.3)21.6 (20.4)<.001
Dietary fiber, g/d25.5 (8.0)19.4 (4.0)23.9 (6.7)28.2 (7.9)34.2 (8.3)<.001
Glycemic index50.8 (4.7)54.2 (2.0)52.1 (3.5)48.8 (4.9)45.5 (4.5)<.001
Solid carbohydrates, g/d320.6 (103.9)308.6 (84.2)331.0 (107.5)316.8 (108.8)299.8 (89.7).091
Liquid carbohydrates, g/d12.4 (15.8)25.6 (20.7)13.2 (14.8)8.1 (12.2)2.5 (3.9)<.001
Whole grains, g/d28.5 (61.6)0.6 (4.8)6.9 (29.6)44.9 (66.7)127.3 (92.1)<.001
Total grains, g/d282.6 (137.2)284.0 (119.5)298.1 (142.1)268.8 (138.2)251.4 (124.8)<.001

Values are mean (SD) or % (number). P value for trend from unadjusted regression models.

The prevalence of MetS among participants was 27.5% (636 cases). The prevalence of the diagnosis criteria were 32.0% for elevated waist circumference, 37.3% for elevated fasting glucose, 57.1% for elevated blood pressure, 37.8% for elevated TGs, and 9.5% for reduced HDL-c.

Our results show a significant inverse association between the adherence to the CQI and the occurrence of MetS. Compared with participants in the lowest CQI category (4-6 points), those in the highest CQI category (13-15 points) had a lower prevalence of MetS (23.7% vs 27.5%). The fully adjusted odds ratios (OR) for MetS among participants with 10 to 12 points was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94), and among those with 13 to 15 points was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.30-0.88), when compared with those in the 4- to 6-point CQI category (P for trend <.001) (Table 4, Fig. 1). Participants in both the 10- to 12-point category and the 13- to 15-point category also showed a lower risk of hypertriglyceridemia: OR = 0.61 (95% CI, 0.46-0.81) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.32-0.71), respectively, when compared with those in the 4- to 6-point category (P for trend <.001) (see Table 4, Fig. 2). No significant association was found for the rest of MetS components (see Table 4).

Odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for metabolic syndrome according to carbohydrate quality index categories. Adjusted for age, type of work (blue collar or white collar), body mass index, smoking status (ever smoker or never smoker), physical activity (total metabolic equivalents-h/wk), hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, total energy, protein intake, total fat intake, and alcohol intake.
Figure 1.

Odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for metabolic syndrome according to carbohydrate quality index categories. Adjusted for age, type of work (blue collar or white collar), body mass index, smoking status (ever smoker or never smoker), physical activity (total metabolic equivalents-h/wk), hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, total energy, protein intake, total fat intake, and alcohol intake.

Odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for the triglyceride criterion of the MetS according to carbohydrate quality index categories. Adjusted for age, type of work (blue collar or white collar), body mass index, smoking status (ever smoker or never smoker), physical activity (total metabolic equivalents-h/wk), hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, total energy, protein intake, total fat intake, and alcohol intake.
Figure 2.

Odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for the triglyceride criterion of the MetS according to carbohydrate quality index categories. Adjusted for age, type of work (blue collar or white collar), body mass index, smoking status (ever smoker or never smoker), physical activity (total metabolic equivalents-h/wk), hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, total energy, protein intake, total fat intake, and alcohol intake.

Table 4.

Association between carbohydrate quality index and metabolic syndrome, as well as metabolic syndrome criteria in Aragon Workers’ Health Study participants

Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality) OR (95%CI)7-9 points OR (95% CI)10-12 points OR (95% CI)13-15 points (highest quality) OR (95% CI)
Participants (N = 2316)n = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trendb
MetS diagnosis, % (n)27.5% (n = 92)30.0% (n = 312)24.8% (n = 185)23.7% (n = 47)
Age-adjustedRef.1.08 (0.82-1.43)0.83 (0.62-1.11)0.78 (0.52-1.17).0384
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.00 (0.71-1.41)0.64 (0.45-0.94)0.52 (0.30-0.88)<.001
Waist circumference criterion for MetS, % (n)30.5% (n = 102)33.6% (n = 349)31.0% (n = 231)29.8% (n = 59)
Age-adjustedRef.1.12 (0.855-1.46)0.99 (0.745-1.31)0.94 (0.63-1.37).624
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.98 (0.655-1.47)0.73 (0.477-1.13)0.72 (0.40-1.31).0556
Fasting blood glucose criterion for MetS, % (n)35.6% (n = 119)37.0% (n = 384)37.7% (n = 281)40.4% (n = 80)
Age-adjustedRef.1.01 (0.782-1.32)1.04 (0.796-1.37)1.18 (0.82-1.70).239
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.96 (0.073-1.28)0.96 (0.071-1.29)1.03 (0.07-1.54).918
Blood pressure criterion for MetS, % (n)56.0% (n = 187)58.4% (n = 607)56.0% (n = 417)56.1% (n = 111)
Age-adjustedRef.1.04 (0.807-1.34)0.93 (0.714-1.22)0.94 (0.66-1.35).384
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.01 (0.715-1.43)0.83 (0.573-1.20)0.71 (0.41-1.19).0416
Triglyceride criterion for MetS, % (n)42.8% (n = 143)39.9% (n = 415)34.4% (n = 256)30.8% (n = 61)
Age-adjustedRef.0.88 (0.68-1.13)0.69 (0.53-0.90)0.59 (0.40-0.85)<.001
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.81 (0.62-1.06)0.61 (0.46-0.81)0.48 (0.32-0.71)<.001
HDL-cholesterol criterion for MetS, % (n)9.3% (n = 31)11.5% (n = 120)7.0% (n = 52)8.6% (n = 17)
Age-adjustedRef.1.273 (0.85-1.96)0.73 (0.46-1.18)0.92 (0.48-1.68).0215
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.538 (0.98-2.47)0.88 (0.53-1.48)0.95 (0.47-1.88).0376
Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality) OR (95%CI)7-9 points OR (95% CI)10-12 points OR (95% CI)13-15 points (highest quality) OR (95% CI)
Participants (N = 2316)n = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trendb
MetS diagnosis, % (n)27.5% (n = 92)30.0% (n = 312)24.8% (n = 185)23.7% (n = 47)
Age-adjustedRef.1.08 (0.82-1.43)0.83 (0.62-1.11)0.78 (0.52-1.17).0384
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.00 (0.71-1.41)0.64 (0.45-0.94)0.52 (0.30-0.88)<.001
Waist circumference criterion for MetS, % (n)30.5% (n = 102)33.6% (n = 349)31.0% (n = 231)29.8% (n = 59)
Age-adjustedRef.1.12 (0.855-1.46)0.99 (0.745-1.31)0.94 (0.63-1.37).624
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.98 (0.655-1.47)0.73 (0.477-1.13)0.72 (0.40-1.31).0556
Fasting blood glucose criterion for MetS, % (n)35.6% (n = 119)37.0% (n = 384)37.7% (n = 281)40.4% (n = 80)
Age-adjustedRef.1.01 (0.782-1.32)1.04 (0.796-1.37)1.18 (0.82-1.70).239
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.96 (0.073-1.28)0.96 (0.071-1.29)1.03 (0.07-1.54).918
Blood pressure criterion for MetS, % (n)56.0% (n = 187)58.4% (n = 607)56.0% (n = 417)56.1% (n = 111)
Age-adjustedRef.1.04 (0.807-1.34)0.93 (0.714-1.22)0.94 (0.66-1.35).384
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.01 (0.715-1.43)0.83 (0.573-1.20)0.71 (0.41-1.19).0416
Triglyceride criterion for MetS, % (n)42.8% (n = 143)39.9% (n = 415)34.4% (n = 256)30.8% (n = 61)
Age-adjustedRef.0.88 (0.68-1.13)0.69 (0.53-0.90)0.59 (0.40-0.85)<.001
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.81 (0.62-1.06)0.61 (0.46-0.81)0.48 (0.32-0.71)<.001
HDL-cholesterol criterion for MetS, % (n)9.3% (n = 31)11.5% (n = 120)7.0% (n = 52)8.6% (n = 17)
Age-adjustedRef.1.273 (0.85-1.96)0.73 (0.46-1.18)0.92 (0.48-1.68).0215
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.538 (0.98-2.47)0.88 (0.53-1.48)0.95 (0.47-1.88).0376

Abbreviations: HDL, high-density lipoprotein; MetS, metabolic syndrome; N, total number of participants; OR, odds ratio; Ref., reference.

aAdjusted for age, type of work (blue collar or white collar), body mass index, smoking status (ever smoker or never smoker), physical activity (total metabolic equivalents-h/wk), hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, total energy, protein intake, total fat intake, and alcohol intake.

bP for trend is calculated using carbohydrate quality index as a continuous variable.

Table 4.

Association between carbohydrate quality index and metabolic syndrome, as well as metabolic syndrome criteria in Aragon Workers’ Health Study participants

Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality) OR (95%CI)7-9 points OR (95% CI)10-12 points OR (95% CI)13-15 points (highest quality) OR (95% CI)
Participants (N = 2316)n = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trendb
MetS diagnosis, % (n)27.5% (n = 92)30.0% (n = 312)24.8% (n = 185)23.7% (n = 47)
Age-adjustedRef.1.08 (0.82-1.43)0.83 (0.62-1.11)0.78 (0.52-1.17).0384
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.00 (0.71-1.41)0.64 (0.45-0.94)0.52 (0.30-0.88)<.001
Waist circumference criterion for MetS, % (n)30.5% (n = 102)33.6% (n = 349)31.0% (n = 231)29.8% (n = 59)
Age-adjustedRef.1.12 (0.855-1.46)0.99 (0.745-1.31)0.94 (0.63-1.37).624
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.98 (0.655-1.47)0.73 (0.477-1.13)0.72 (0.40-1.31).0556
Fasting blood glucose criterion for MetS, % (n)35.6% (n = 119)37.0% (n = 384)37.7% (n = 281)40.4% (n = 80)
Age-adjustedRef.1.01 (0.782-1.32)1.04 (0.796-1.37)1.18 (0.82-1.70).239
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.96 (0.073-1.28)0.96 (0.071-1.29)1.03 (0.07-1.54).918
Blood pressure criterion for MetS, % (n)56.0% (n = 187)58.4% (n = 607)56.0% (n = 417)56.1% (n = 111)
Age-adjustedRef.1.04 (0.807-1.34)0.93 (0.714-1.22)0.94 (0.66-1.35).384
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.01 (0.715-1.43)0.83 (0.573-1.20)0.71 (0.41-1.19).0416
Triglyceride criterion for MetS, % (n)42.8% (n = 143)39.9% (n = 415)34.4% (n = 256)30.8% (n = 61)
Age-adjustedRef.0.88 (0.68-1.13)0.69 (0.53-0.90)0.59 (0.40-0.85)<.001
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.81 (0.62-1.06)0.61 (0.46-0.81)0.48 (0.32-0.71)<.001
HDL-cholesterol criterion for MetS, % (n)9.3% (n = 31)11.5% (n = 120)7.0% (n = 52)8.6% (n = 17)
Age-adjustedRef.1.273 (0.85-1.96)0.73 (0.46-1.18)0.92 (0.48-1.68).0215
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.538 (0.98-2.47)0.88 (0.53-1.48)0.95 (0.47-1.88).0376
Carbohydrate quality index
4-6 points (lowest quality) OR (95%CI)7-9 points OR (95% CI)10-12 points OR (95% CI)13-15 points (highest quality) OR (95% CI)
Participants (N = 2316)n = 334n = 1039n = 745n = 198P for trendb
MetS diagnosis, % (n)27.5% (n = 92)30.0% (n = 312)24.8% (n = 185)23.7% (n = 47)
Age-adjustedRef.1.08 (0.82-1.43)0.83 (0.62-1.11)0.78 (0.52-1.17).0384
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.00 (0.71-1.41)0.64 (0.45-0.94)0.52 (0.30-0.88)<.001
Waist circumference criterion for MetS, % (n)30.5% (n = 102)33.6% (n = 349)31.0% (n = 231)29.8% (n = 59)
Age-adjustedRef.1.12 (0.855-1.46)0.99 (0.745-1.31)0.94 (0.63-1.37).624
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.98 (0.655-1.47)0.73 (0.477-1.13)0.72 (0.40-1.31).0556
Fasting blood glucose criterion for MetS, % (n)35.6% (n = 119)37.0% (n = 384)37.7% (n = 281)40.4% (n = 80)
Age-adjustedRef.1.01 (0.782-1.32)1.04 (0.796-1.37)1.18 (0.82-1.70).239
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.96 (0.073-1.28)0.96 (0.071-1.29)1.03 (0.07-1.54).918
Blood pressure criterion for MetS, % (n)56.0% (n = 187)58.4% (n = 607)56.0% (n = 417)56.1% (n = 111)
Age-adjustedRef.1.04 (0.807-1.34)0.93 (0.714-1.22)0.94 (0.66-1.35).384
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.01 (0.715-1.43)0.83 (0.573-1.20)0.71 (0.41-1.19).0416
Triglyceride criterion for MetS, % (n)42.8% (n = 143)39.9% (n = 415)34.4% (n = 256)30.8% (n = 61)
Age-adjustedRef.0.88 (0.68-1.13)0.69 (0.53-0.90)0.59 (0.40-0.85)<.001
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.0.81 (0.62-1.06)0.61 (0.46-0.81)0.48 (0.32-0.71)<.001
HDL-cholesterol criterion for MetS, % (n)9.3% (n = 31)11.5% (n = 120)7.0% (n = 52)8.6% (n = 17)
Age-adjustedRef.1.273 (0.85-1.96)0.73 (0.46-1.18)0.92 (0.48-1.68).0215
Multivariable-adjustedaRef.1.538 (0.98-2.47)0.88 (0.53-1.48)0.95 (0.47-1.88).0376

Abbreviations: HDL, high-density lipoprotein; MetS, metabolic syndrome; N, total number of participants; OR, odds ratio; Ref., reference.

aAdjusted for age, type of work (blue collar or white collar), body mass index, smoking status (ever smoker or never smoker), physical activity (total metabolic equivalents-h/wk), hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, total energy, protein intake, total fat intake, and alcohol intake.

bP for trend is calculated using carbohydrate quality index as a continuous variable.

Discussion

In this large epidemiological study, we found an inverse association between the adherence to the CQI and the occurrence of MetS. Therefore, consuming a diet rich in high-quality carbohydrates is associated with a lower risk of MetS among middle-aged Mediterranean working men who were free of CVD. This association was mainly driven by the hypertriglyceridemia component. These findings support that the quality of dietary carbohydrates is likely to play an important role in cardiometabolic health.

In the latest research, the isolated CQI components showed considerable clinical benefits in reducing the risk of MetS. More in particular, a study performed with 1301 adult cancer survivors (9) showed that as fiber intake increases the risk of MetS decreases (9). Moreover, a meta-analysis conducted with 14 observational studies, both cross-sectional and cohort studies (11), suggested that whole-grain consumption was negatively associated with MetS, whereas refined grain consumption was positively associated (11). Likewise, a meta-analysis that assessed whether a high GI or glycemic load contributed to the development of MetS (12) showed that a high vs a low dietary GI (but not glycemic load) was associated with an increased risk of MetS. Finally, the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, as an example of liquid carbohydrates, is suggested to increase the risk of MetS. In fact, meta-analyses by Malik et al (32) and Narain et al (33) reported that the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with an increment of 20% and 46% in the risk of developing MetS, respectively. This may be plausible because liquid from carbohydrates, as in sugar-sweetened beverages, are suggested to produce less satiety than an equivalent amount of carbohydrates coming from solid food (34).

The association between CQI and MetS may stem from quality aspects of dietary carbohydrates on traditional metabolic risk factors. For example, 2 studies performed with adults from Korea (15) and Spain (35) showed a significant inverse association between CQI and the incidence of overweight/obesity (15, 35) as well as with hypertension (15). However, another study conducted in the Framingham Offspring cohort (17) showed that a higher CQI was only marginally associated with a small increase in waist circumference, suggesting that CQI does not strongly influence waist circumference. These results are in accordance with the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial by Martínez-González et al (7), which was conducted among participants at high risk for CVD. After 12 months of follow-up, improvements in CQI were favorably associated with CVD as well as with improvements in MetS components. Thus, improvements in CQI lead to a reduction in body weight, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin A1c, TGs, and to increments in HDL-c (7), even among those who already had MetS.

The association between the adherence to the CQI and MetS has also been previously assessed in a representative sample composed of 12 027 adults from Korea (15). The association did not reach statistical significance when comparing extreme sex-specific quintiles of the CQI after adjustment for confounders, although central estimates were always protective. In a recent study conducted with 850 participants living in Iran and collected through the health system (21), no association between CQI and MetS was found after using a modified version of the CQI. Discrepancy in results may stem from differences in the MetS definition (eg, cutoff points for abdominal obesity were modified in Korean adults to account for their phenotype), also differences among countries in food consumption (eg, in the Iranian sample no consumption of whole grain was accounted for, which made the investigators eliminate this component from the index), the selection of the samples (eg, our sample was made up only of men), or the few number of events.

The biological mechanisms underlying the association between carbohydrate quality and MetS could be related to insulin resistance, impaired glucose metabolism, increased inflammation, weight gain and obesity, and reduced fiber intake.

Low-quality carbohydrate diets are practically based on high amounts of carbohydrate from refined sources, such as liquid carbohydrates, white bread, white rice, refined flours, and a high amount of added sugars (36). These diets show a lower consumption of proteins and fats, which are associated with an adverse effect on total mortality (36). A high consumption of refined carbohydrates is usually accompanied by a high dietary GI and glycemic load content (21, 36).

Refined carbohydrates, especially those with a high GI, increase digestion and absorption of food, leading to rapid spikes in blood sugar levels, causing an overproduction of insulin and a suppression of free fatty acid levels (37). A counterregulatory hormone response is triggered, reducing reactive hypoglycemia and enhancing the secretion of free fatty acids to levels above those observed after consumption of low GI meal (37, 38). Moreover, low-quality carbohydrates are characterized by their low dietary fiber content, making satiety signals in the body less effective (39). Over time, the abrupt changes in circulating concentrations of glucose and free fatty acids that trigger failures in satiety perception could increase food intake and decrease insulin sensitivity, leading to inflammation, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and insulin resistance (40, 41). Moreover, a low-quality carbohydrate diet is characterized by a high consumption of liquid carbohydrates. Beverages with carbohydrates are easily digestible, providing less satiety signals to the body, but considerably increase daily caloric intake, promoting the previous mentioned mechanisms (42, 43).

Our findings extend the knowledge of the benefits of a high-quality carbohydrate diet on the occurrence of MetS. Our findings are relevant from a public health point of view, since dietary recommendations should include improving the quality of dietary carbohydrates, rather than only limiting their intake in quantity. Improvements in dietary habits should involve high-quality carbohydrate consumption, increments in the consumption of fruit and vegetables, a reduction in the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, as well as in the consumption of carbohydrates that are quick and easy to digest, such as liquid carbohydrates, refined grains, or those coming from ultraprocessed food. Therefore, it is relevant to communicate to the public the importance of the quality of carbohydrates over quantity. However, it is also desirable to replicate these analyses in other populations, whether Mediterranean or not, and in longitudinal cohort studies.

Strengths and Limitations

Our study has several strengths, such as the use of standardized protocols and high-quality data collection methods to obtain information on MetS, as well as our relatively large sample size. However, it also has several limitations. First, the cross-sectional design does not allow us to establish causality, nor the temporality of the associations. Second, our sample of women was too small to be analyzed separately, and therefore results were obtained only among men. In addition, our sample comprised working men, all of whom worked in the same car assembly plant; as such, the results may not be directly generalized to the general population. Third, although the dietary assessment was conducted using an FFQ and carried out by trained interviewers, we cannot rule out the presence of some degree of misclassification (44). However, the scientific literature supports that the FFQ is a valid tool to evaluate food habits in epidemiological studies (25, 45). Fourth, even though we adjusted for the major potential confounders, residual confounding may persist.

In short, this study provides grounds for specific recommendations on improving dietary carbohydrate quality as the primary prevention of MetS. The CQI could also be used to inform the general public about a poor-quality diet, which in turn may result in dietary qualitative changes. The CQI could also be useful in monitoring these changes.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that there is a protective association between the consumption of high-quality carbohydrates and the presence of MetS and hypertriglyceridemia among middle-aged men free of CVD.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the study participants, doctors, and health-care professionals at the Opel factory. The authors also thank the AWHS technical staff.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV) and grants PI19/00020, PI19/00948, PI20/00144 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (co-supported by the European Regional Development Fund “Investing in Your Future”).

Author Contributions

The authors’ contributions were as follows—A.M.C.: interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript. M.L.: analysis of data and critical revision of the manuscript. P.G.C.: study concept and critical revision of the manuscript. B.M.F.: study concept and design, interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript. J.A.C., N.C.G., and V.M.B.: revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. A.M.C., M.L., P.G.C., B.M.F., J.A.C., N.C.G., and V.M.B. read and approved the final manuscript.

Disclosures

None.

Data Availability

Data described in the manuscript, code book, and analytic code will be made available on request pending on request from the corresponding author. The data are not public due to ethical reasons.

References

1

Eckel
RH
,
Grundy
SM
,
Zimmet
PZ
.
The metabolic syndrome
.
Lancet
.
2005
;
365
(
9468
):
1415
1428
.

2

Grundy
SM
,
Cleeman
JI
,
Daniels
SR
, et al.
Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American heart association/national heart, lung, and blood institute scientific statement
.
Circulation
.
2005
;
112
(
17
):
2735
2752
.

3

National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
.
Third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report
.
Circulation
.
2002
;
106
(
25
):
3143
3143
.

4

Brouwer
BG
,
Visseren
FL
,
van der Graaf
Y
;
SMART Study Group
.
The effect of leisure-time physical activity on the presence of metabolic syndrome in patients with manifest arterial disease. The SMART study
.
Am Heart J
.
2007
;
154
(
6
):
1146
1152
.

5

Alegría
E
,
Cordero
A
,
Laclaustra
M
, et al.
[Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the Spanish working population: MESYAS registry]
.
Rev Esp Cardiol
.
2005
;
58
(
7
):
797
806
.

6

Pérez-Martínez
P
,
Mikhailidis
DP
,
Athyros
VG
, et al.
Lifestyle recommendations for the prevention and management of metabolic syndrome: an international panel recommendation
.
Nutr Rev
.
2017
;
75
(
5
):
307
326
.

7

Martínez-González
MA
,
Fernandez-Lazaro
CI
,
Toledo
E
, et al.
Carbohydrate quality changes and concurrent changes in cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal analysis in the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial
.
Am J Clin Nutr
.
2019
:
111
(
2
):
291
306
.

8

Jacobs
DR
Jr,
Gross
MD
,
Tapsell
LC
.
Food synergy: an operational concept for understanding nutrition
.
Am J Clin Nutr
.
2009
;
89
(
5
):
1543S
1548S
.

9

Kim
K
,
Chang
Y
.
Association of dietary fiber intake with metabolic syndrome among adult cancer survivors: a population-based cross-sectional study
.
Sci Rep
.
2021
;
11
(
1
):
11794
.

10

Fulgoni
VL
III,
Brauchla
M
,
Fleige
L
,
Chu
Y
.
Association of whole-grain and dietary fiber intake with cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents
.
Nutr Health
.
2020
;
26
(
3
):
243
251
.

11

Guo
H
,
Ding
J
,
Liang
J
,
Zhang
Y
.
Associations of whole grain and refined grain consumption with metabolic syndrome. a meta-analysis of observational studies
.
Front Nutr
.
2021
;
8
:
695620
.

12

Askari
M
,
Dehghani
A
,
Abshirini
M
,
Raeisi
T
,
Alizadeh
S
.
Glycemic index, but not glycemic load, is associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome: meta-analysis of observational studies
.
Int J Clin Pract
.
2021
;
75
(
10
):
e14295
.

13

Dwivedi
AK
,
Dubey
P
,
Reddy
SY
,
Clegg
DJ
.
Associations of glycemic index and glycemic load with cardiovascular disease: updated evidence from meta-analysis and cohort studies
.
Curr Cardiol Rep
.
2022
;
24
(
3
):
141
161
.

14

Zazpe
I
,
Sánchez-Taínta
A
,
Santiago
S
, et al.
Association between dietary carbohydrate intake quality and micronutrient intake adequacy in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra) project
.
Br J Nutr
.
2014
;
111
(
11
):
2000
2009
.

15

Kim
DY
,
Kim
SH
,
Lim
H
.
Association between dietary carbohydrate quality and the prevalence of obesity and hypertension
.
J Hum Nutr Diet
.
2018
;
31
(
5
):
587
596
.

16

Janbozorgi
N
,
Djafarian
K
,
Mohammadpour
S
, et al.
Association between carbohydrate quality index and general and central obesity in adults: a population-based study in Iran
.
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res
.
2021
;
13
(
4
):
298
308
.

17

Sawicki
CM
,
Lichtenstein
AH
,
Rogers
GT
, et al.
Comparison of indices of carbohydrate quality and food sources of dietary fiber on longitudinal changes in waist circumference in the framingham offspring cohort
.
Nutrients
.
2021
;
13
(
3
):
997
.

18

Jebraeili
H
,
Shabbidar
S
,
Sajjadpour
Z
, et al.
The association between carbohydrate quality index and anthropometry, blood glucose, lipid profile and blood pressure in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Iran
.
J Diabetes Metab Disord
.
2021
;
20
(
2
):
1349
1358
.

19

Muñoz-Cabrejas
A
,
Laclaustra
M
,
Guallar-Castillón
P
, et al.
High-quality intake of carbohydrates is associated with lower prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in femoral arteries: the AWHS study
.
Clin Nutr
.
2021
;
40
(
6
):
3883
3889
.

20

Zazpe
I
,
Santiago
S
,
Gea
A
, et al.
Association between a dietary carbohydrate index and cardiovascular disease in the SUN (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra) project
.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
.
2016
;
26
(
11
):
1048
1056
.

21

Majdi
M
,
Imani
H
,
Bazshahi
E
, et al.
Habitual- and meal-specific carbohydrate quality index and their relation to metabolic syndrome in a sample of Iranian adults
.
Front Nutr
.
2022
;
9
:
763345
.

22

Casasnovas
JA
,
Alcaide
V
,
Civeira
F
, et al.
Aragon workers’ health study—design and cohort description
.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord
.
2012
;
12
(
1
):
45
.

23

Muñoz-Cabrejas
A
,
Laclaustra
M
,
Guallar-Castillón
P
, et al. Low-quality carbohydrate intake is associated with a higher prevalence of the metabolic syndrome: The AWHS Study. (Supplemental Figure-Participant selection flow-chart). Zenodo. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10118322.

24

Martin-Moreno
JM
,
Boyle
P
,
Gorgojo
L
, et al.
Development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire in Spain
.
Int J Epidemiol
.
1993
;
22
(
3
):
512
519
.

25

Moreiras
O
,
Carvajal
A
,
Cabrera
L
,
Cuadrado
C
.
Tablas de Composición de Alimentos
.
Pirámide
;
2018
.

26

Mataix
J
.
Tabla de Composición de Alimentos (Food Composition Tables)
.
Universidad de Granada
;
2009
.

27

Martínez-González
MA
,
López-Fontana
C
,
Varo
JJ
,
Sánchez-Villegas
A
,
Martinez
JA
.
Validation of the spanish version of the physical activity questionnaire used in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals’ Follow-up Study
.
Public Health Nutr
.
2005
;
8
(
7
):
920
927
.

28

Chasan-Taber
S
,
Rimm
EB
,
Stampfer
MJ
, et al.
Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity questionnaire for male health professionals
.
Epidemiology
.
1996
;
7
(
1
):
81
86
.

29

Wolf
AM
,
Hunter
DJ
,
Colditz
GA
, et al.
Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity questionnaire
.
Int J Epidemiol
.
1994
;
23
(
5
):
991
999
.

30

Ainsworth
BE
,
Haskell
WL
,
Herrmann
SD
, et al.
2011 compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
.
2011
;
43
(
8
):
1575
1581
.

31

Pearson
TA
,
Palaniappan
LP
,
Artinian
NT
, et al.
American heart association guide for improving cardiovascular health at the community level, 2013 update: a scientific statement for public health practitioners, healthcare providers, and health policy makers
.
Circulation
.
2013
;
127
(
16
):
1730
1753
.

32

Malik
VS
,
Popkin
BM
,
Bray
GA
,
Després
JP
,
Willett
WC
,
Hu
FB
.
Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
.
Diabetes Care
.
2010
;
33
(
11
):
2477
2483
.

33

Narain
A
,
Kwok
CS
,
Mamas
MA
.
Soft drinks and sweetened beverages and the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Int J Clin Pract
.
2016
;
70
(
10
):
791
805
.

34

Pan
A
,
Hu
FB
.
Effects of carbohydrates on satiety: differences between liquid and solid food
.
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care
.
2011
;
14
(
4
):
385
390
.

35

Santiago
S
,
Zazpe
I
,
Bes-Rastrollo
M
, et al.
Carbohydrate quality, weight change and incident obesity in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN project
.
Eur J Clin Nutr
.
2015
;
69
(
3
):
297
302
.

36

Dehghan
M
,
Mente
A
,
Zhang
X
, et al.
Associations of fats and carbohydrate intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 18 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study
.
Lancet
.
2017
;
390
(
10107
):
2050
2062
.

37

Ludwig
DS
.
The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease
.
JAMA
.
2002
;
287
(
18
):
2414
2423
.

38

Walsh
CO
,
Ebbeling
CB
,
Swain
JF
,
Markowitz
RL
,
Feldman
HA
,
Ludwig
DS
.
Effects of diet composition on postprandial energy availability during weight loss maintenance
.
PLoS One
.
2013
;
8
(
3
):
e58172
.

39

Borkoles
E
,
Krastins
D
,
van der Pols
JC
,
Sims
P
,
Polman
R
.
Short-term effect of additional daily dietary fibre intake on appetite, satiety, gastrointestinal comfort, acceptability, and feasibility
.
Nutrients
.
2022
;
14
(
19
):
4214
.

40

Blaak
EE
,
Antoine
JM
,
Benton
D
, et al.
Impact of postprandial glycaemia on health and prevention of disease
.
Obes Rev
.
2012
;
13
(
10
):
923
984
.

41

Ebbert
JO
,
Jensen
MD
.
Fat depots, free fatty acids, and dyslipidemia
.
Nutrients
.
2013
;
5
(
2
):
495
508
.

42

Muñoz-Cabrejas
A
,
Guallar-Castillón
P
,
Laclaustra
M
,
Sandoval-Insausti
H
,
Moreno-Franco
B
.
Association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and the risk of the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Nutrients
.
2023
;
15
(
2
):
430
.

43

Malik
VS
,
Hu
FB
.
Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: an update of the evidence
.
Nutrients
.
2019
;
11
(
8
):
1840
.

44

Michels
KB
.
A renaissance for measurement error
.
Int J Epidemiol
.
2001
;
30
(
3
):
421
422
.

45

Hu
FB
,
Rimm
E
,
Smith-Warner
SA
, et al.
Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire
.
Am J Clin Nutr
.
1999
;
69
(
2
):
243
249
.

Abbreviations

     
  • AWHS

    Aragon Workers’ Health Study

  •  
  • CQI

    carbohydrate quality index

  •  
  • CVD

    cardiovascular disease

  •  
  • FFQ

    food frequency questionnaire

  •  
  • GI

    glycemic index

  •  
  • HDL-c

    high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

  •  
  • LDL-c

    low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

  •  
  • MetS

    metabolic syndrome

  •  
  • OR

    odds ratio

  •  
  • RR

    relative risk

  •  
  • TGs

    triglycerides

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)