Abstract

Aims

This multicenter prospective observational cohort study assessed real-world changes in glycemic and person-reported outcomes one-year after Control-IQ initiation in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Methods

Between October 2021 and December 2022, all children 6-18 years who started Control-IQ at 13 Belgian centers were consecutively recruited. Data were collected at start of Control-IQ and after 4, 8 and 12 months. Person-reported outcomes were evaluated through questionnaires (Diabetes Quality of Life for Youth [DQOLY], Hypoglycemia Fear Survey [HFS], HAPPI-D). Data are reported as mean ± SD or least-squares mean (95% CI).

Results

A total of 114 children were included, with a mean age of 12.0 ± 3.2 years and of whom 61.4% were girls. Time in range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) increased from start (51.6% [47.6-55.5]) to 12 months (64.4% [61.2-67.5]) (p<0.001). After 12 months, HbA1c decreased from 62 mmol/mol (60-65) (7.8% [7.6-8.1]) to 54 mmol/mol (52-56) (7.1% [6.9-7.3]) and time <3.9 mmol/L from 3.9% (3.1-4.8) to 2.7% (1.9-3.5) (all p<0.001). Children scored better on DQOLY satisfaction (70.4 [67.8-73.0] vs 74.0 points [71.3-76.6]) and DQOLY impact (54.6 [50.9-58.3] vs 51.3 points [47.4-55.1]), and parents on HAPPI-D (22.5 [21.1-23.9] vs 19.6 points [18.2-21.0]) and HFS worry (25.0 [21.6-28.4] vs 20.3 points [17.0-23.5] (all p<0.001). Children missed fewer days of school (287 vs 30 days/100 person-years, p=0.001) and parents missed less days of work (247 vs 47 days/100 person-years, p<0.001).

Conclusions

One-year use of Control-IQ was associated with improved glycemic management, more diabetes-related quality of life and fewer school/work absences.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
You do not currently have access to this article.