Abstract

Context

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related hypothyroidism is mostly irreversible and prompt thyroid hormone replacement therapy is crucial, especially for patients undergoing neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Objective

This study aimed to propose a novel titration strategy for ICI-related hypothyroidism, evaluate levothyroxine (LT4) dose differences between hypothyroidism patterns, and develop a predictive equation for the optimal LT4 dose.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Tertiary academic hospital.

Patients

109 patients with ICI-related hypothyroidism.

Interventions

Rapid versus conventional titration strategy.

Main outcome measures

The time to achieve normal free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels.

Results

Patients with transient thyrotoxicosis followed by overt hypothyroidism (Toxic-OHypo) required higher LT4 doses to achieve a euthyroid state compared to isolated overt hypothyroidism, with a mean difference of 0.23 μg/kg/day (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.38). In patients with ICI-related overt hypothyroidism and no cardiac disease, who had elevated TSH levels within 4 weeks of the last documented low or normal TSH, a rapid titration strategy was implemented. This strategy significantly improved the cumulative incidence of achieving normal FT4 and TSH levels compared to conventional titration strategy (hazard ratio [HR], 4.44; 95% CI, 2.24-8.82; HR, 4.11; 95% CI, 2.18-7.73, respectively), with a comparable safety profile. Predicted LT4 dose at euthyroid state (µg/kg/day) = (-0.016×body weight) + (0.109×baseline TSH level) + 2.661 for patients with Toxic-OHypo.

Conclusions

LT4 requirements vary depending on the subtype of ICI-related hypothyroidism. The rapid titration strategy reduced the time to achieve a euthyroid state without a significant increase in adverse effects compared to conventional LT4 replacement therapy.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
You do not currently have access to this article.