Abstract

Objectives

The treatment of bone and joint infections is challenging due to the presence of bacterial biofilm and the increasing emergence of multiresistant strains. BAG-S53P4 is a bone substitute that is characterized by osteoconductive and antimicrobial properties. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of BAG-S53P4 against biofilm produced in vitro by multiresistant bacterial strains.

Methods

Multiresistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from bone and joint infections were used in this study. Titanium discs covered by bacterial biofilm were incubated with BAG-S53P4 or inert glass as a control. The amount of biofilm on each titanium disc was evaluated after 48 h of incubation by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Results

Significantly lower total biomass volumes were observed for all strains after treatment with BAG-S53P4 when compared with controls. Moreover, the percentage of dead cells was significantly higher in treated samples than in controls for all the tested strains.

Conclusions

BAG-S53P4 is able to reduce the biofilm produced by multiresistant S. epidermidis, A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae on titanium substrates in vitro, probably by interfering with cell viability. Owing to its osteoconductive, antibacterial and antibiofilm properties, the use of BAG-S53P4 may be a successful strategy for the treatment of bone and prosthetic joint infections.

Introduction

The treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is a challenging and expensive procedure, often requiring bone grafting to reconstruct bone defects and prolonged cycles of antibiotic therapy to fight infection. PJIs are often complicated by the presence of biofilm, which protects bacteria from the host immune system and antibacterial agents. Biofilm-related infections are more difficult to treat as they are characterized by chronicity, frequent recurrence, antibiotic resistance, difficult diagnosis, complex and prolonged treatment, poor prognosis and high socioeconomic costs.

Bioactive glass BAG-S53P4 (BonAlive® Biomaterials, Turku, Finland) is a bone substitute characterized by good osteoconductive and mechanical properties,1,2 which has been successfully used in the treatment of osteomyelitis and bone fractures.3–9 In addition, it possesses proangiogenic and antimicrobial properties.6,10–12 The antimicrobial activity of bioactive glass is due to the release of ions from its surface after immersion in body fluids, resulting in an increase of osmotic pressure and pH, which makes the surrounding environment unsuitable for microbial growth.13,14

While many studies evaluated the osteoconductive and antimicrobial properties of BAG-S53P4, only two investigated its antibiofilm activity, both showing promising results.15,16

The aim of this study was to get further insight into the antibiofilm activity of BAG-S53P4, evaluating its effectiveness against the biofilm produced in vitro by MDR bacterial strains isolated from PJIs.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

Three multiresistant strains isolated from PJIs at the microbiology laboratory of IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute were used. In particular, the following were used: one strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing ESBLs and carbapenemases; one strain of Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins and β-lactams and susceptible to colistin; and one strain of methicillin- and glycopeptide-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. All strains were screened before the beginning of the study in order to assess their ability to produce biofilm according to the spectrophotometric assay described by Christensen et al.17

BAG-S53P4 preparation and conditioning

BAG-S53P4 (granules of 0.5–0.8 mm diameter) was prepared at a final concentration of 400 mg/mL in tryptic soy broth (TSB; bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France). Conditioning was obtained through the incubation of bioactive glass in TSB at 37°C for 48 h. pH values were measured at regular intervals. A pH value ≥10 was considered suggestive of optimal conditioning. Once optimal conditioning was reached, the bioactive glass was ready to use.

Biofilm formation

Sterile sandblasted titanium discs with a diameter of 25 mm and thickness of 5 mm (Adler Ortho, Cormano, Italy) were used as substrate for biofilm formation. Six discs were used for each bacterial strain (3 for inert glass and 3 for BAG-S53P4), for a total of 18 discs. Briefly, bacterial overnight cultures were suspended in TSB at a final density of 1.0 × 108 cfu/mL and 200 μL of each microbial suspension was inoculated into sterile 6-well polystyrene plates (Jet Biofil, Guangzhou, China) containing titanium discs and 4.8 mL of TSB. After incubation at 37°C in aerobic atmosphere for 24 h, the growth medium was removed together with non-adherent bacteria and 5 mL of new broth was added. Plates were incubated for an additional 48 h, until a visible biofilm was obtained.

BAG-S53P4 treatment

Titanium discs covered by bacterial biofilm were placed into new sterile 6-well polystyrene microplates containing the conditioned bioactive glass. Negative controls were performed by adding inert glass of the same granule size (R1350 Iittala clear; Iittala, Finland), which has been shown not to have antibacterial or antibiofilm properties.6,15,16 The amount of biofilm on each titanium disc was evaluated after 48 h of incubation.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) analysis

CLSM analysis was carried out following a method we previously developed for quantitative analysis of biofilm.16,18 Microbial biofilm was stained with a fluorescent stain (Filmtracer™ LIVE/DEAD® Biofilm Viability Kit; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing a mixture of two dyes: SYTO® 9 (green stain) and propidium iodide (red stain), 3 μL of each component in 1 mL of saline solution. SYTO® 9 generally labels all bacteria in a population, while propidium iodide penetrates only bacteria with damaged membranes. Thus, bacteria with intact cell membranes (i.e. live) stain fluorescent green, whereas bacteria with damaged membranes (i.e. dead) stain fluorescent red. Discs were incubated with fluorescent stains at room temperature for 15 min in the dark. In order to minimize the air contact and maintain constant sample moisture conditions, a coverslip was placed on the specimen. Stained biofilm was examined with a confocal microscope (Leica model TCS SP5; Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany) using a ×20 dry objective (HC PL FLUOTAR 20×/0.50 dry) plus a ×2 electronic zoom. A 488 nm laser line was used to excite SYTO® 9, while the fluorescent emission was detected at 500–540 nm. Propidium iodide was excited with a 561 nm laser line, while its fluorescent emission was detected at 600–695 nm. In order to avoid false colocalization between the fluorescent stains due to bacterial movement, a simultaneous acquisition mode of the two channels was adopted, in which the laser beam scans the visual field at a frequency of 700 Hz. Moreover, using a third laser line (633 nm) in reflection mode, it was possible to determine both titanium disc (starting acquisition point) and coverslip (ending acquisition point) reflecting surfaces. Images from five randomly selected fields were acquired for each titanium disc. Sequential optical sections of 2 μm were collected along the z-axis over the complete thickness of the biofilm. The resulting stacks of images were quantified using an image processing package (Fijy, ImageJ 1.47 q; National Institute of Health, USA) and subsequently rendered into three-dimensional mode using image analysis software (Imaris 7.2.3, Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland).

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparisons were performed using an unpaired Student's t-test. A value of P ≤ 0.05 was used as the significance level.

Results

Three-dimensional reconstructions of the images of controls and BAG-S53P4-treated samples acquired with CLSM are shown in Figure 1. The corresponding quantifications obtained through the image analysis software are displayed in Figures 2 and 3.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of microbial biofilms. The left-hand panels (a, b and c) represent control samples, while the right-hand panels (d, e and f) represent BAG-S53P4-treated samples of S. epidermidis (a and d), A. baumannii (b and e) and K. pneumoniae (c and f). Green = viable cells. Red = dead cells. Blue = titanium. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 1.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of microbial biofilms. The left-hand panels (a, b and c) represent control samples, while the right-hand panels (d, e and f) represent BAG-S53P4-treated samples of S. epidermidis (a and d), A. baumannii (b and e) and K. pneumoniae (c and f). Green = viable cells. Red = dead cells. Blue = titanium. Scale bar = 50 µm.

Total biomass volume, expressed in µm3, of the biofilm developed by MDR strains after incubation with 400 mg/mL BAG-S53P4 or inert glass (CTRL) for 48 h. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ***P ≤ 0.001. *P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2.

Total biomass volume, expressed in µm3, of the biofilm developed by MDR strains after incubation with 400 mg/mL BAG-S53P4 or inert glass (CTRL) for 48 h. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ***P ≤ 0.001. *P ≤ 0.05.

Percentage composition, in terms of live cells (white bars) and dead cells (grey bars), of the biofilm developed by MDR strains after incubation with 400 mg/mL BAG-S53P4 or inert glass (CTRL) for 48 h.
Figure 3.

Percentage composition, in terms of live cells (white bars) and dead cells (grey bars), of the biofilm developed by MDR strains after incubation with 400 mg/mL BAG-S53P4 or inert glass (CTRL) for 48 h.

The total biomass volume was estimated for each disc (Figure 2). After incubation with BAG-S53P4, the total biofilm biomass volume was significantly lower than controls for all MDR strains tested. In particular, reductions of 50%, 35% and 26% versus controls were observed for S. epidermidis (P = 0.0001), A. baumannii (P = 0.0002) and K. pneumoniae (P = 0.03), respectively.

The volume of biofilm occupied by bacterial cells was also quantified, together with the percentage of live and dead cells (Figure 3). For all bacteria, a significantly higher percentage of dead cells was observed in treated samples (P = 0.0001 for S. epidermidis, P = 0.0002 for A. baumannii and P = 0.03 for K. pneumoniae versus controls).

Discussion

Over 65% of all human infections are estimated to be biofilm related,19,20 representing a significant burden on the healthcare system. Biofilm-related infections are very common in orthopaedic practice, since the surfaces of commonly used materials for the manufacturing of orthopaedic components (e.g. titanium and its alloys, stainless steel, cobalt-chromium, various polymeric biomaterials and polymethylmethacrylate cement) are susceptible to colonization by biofilm-forming bacteria.21 Eradication of biofilm-related infections is of concern because, thanks to their adapted ability to survive in adverse environmental conditions, bacterial biofilms are recalcitrant to antibiotic therapies and immune clearance.22 The main therapeutic strategy is the use of antibiotics, which, due to adaptive resistance, are often insufficient to clear biofilm infections. Thus, novel antibiofilm therapies are required.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro antibiofilm activity of BAG-S53P4 against MDR strains isolated from PJIs. The evaluation was carried out by means of CLSM analysis, adopting a well-established method developed by our research group.16,18

Advances in confocal microscopy allowed replacing old semi-quantitative colorimetric methods (e.g. crystal violet assay, developed by Christensen et al.17 in 1985) for biofilm evaluation with a technology characterized by higher sensitivity and specificity. While colorimetric methods only allow the measurement of the dry biomass, CLSM analysis supplies more detailed information as it permits the three-dimensional visualization of living biofilms.

In order to mimic the materials used in orthopaedics, sandblasted titanium discs were used as substrate for the development of biofilm. Granule size, the concentration of BAG-S53P4 and the incubation period were chosen on the basis of previous experiments.8,16

Before use, we activated ion release from bioactive glass through a conditioning step of 48 h. Such a long period was due to the experimental conditions used (e.g. restricted surface of contact between the growth medium and the bioactive glass and the buffering ability of the growth medium), which might slow down ion release in comparison with the in vivo situation. For this reason, in order to achieve optimal efficacy in vitro, BAG-S53P4 needs an activation step that is not required in vivo.

When compared with controls, significantly lower total biomass volumes were observed for all strains after treatment with BAG-S53P4, with percentage reductions ranging from 26% to 50% depending on the strain under evaluation. Similar values were observed for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (36%) and Staphylococcus aureus (47%) strains in a previous study performed under the same experimental conditions.16 However, in previous studies, only SYTO® 9 was used for staining of biofilm for CLSM analysis, so that a distinction could not be made between live and dead cells.

The rate of dead cells was significantly higher in treated samples than in controls for all the tested strains, suggesting that a possible mechanism of action by which BAG-S53P4 is able to reduce the biofilm developed by MDR bacterial strains is interference with cell viability. This observation is supported by previous experiments showing a bactericidal activity of BAG-S53P4 against the same strains tested in this study and against other bacterial strains.6,23

In addition to bacterial cells, biofilm is composed of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) made of various substances such as polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids and lipids. The EPS constitutes an envelope embedding bacterial cells and almost certainly has essential roles in defining the cohesiveness and other physical properties of biofilm.24 A limitation of this study is that a quantitative evaluation of the EPS was not performed, as the LIVE/DEAD kit only stains bacterial cells. Further studies might be performed with stains specific for EPS components, in order to assess the effect of BAG-S53P4 on the biofilm matrix.

As mentioned above, MDR strains were used in this study. At present, the correlation between biofilm production and multidrug resistance is unclear. Strains capable of forming biofilm might be selected under antibiotic pressure or, conversely, they might acquire resistance to multiple drugs within biofilm communities. In either event, the high colonizing capacity of biofilm-forming strains combined with their resistance to multiple drugs will contribute to microorganism survival and further dissemination.25 In this setting, the use of BAG-S53P4, which is able to reduce biofilm formation while bypassing drug resistance, may be the best strategy.

In conclusion, the results of this study show that BAG-S53P4 is able to reduce the biofilm produced by multiresistant S. epidermidis, A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae on titanium substrates in vitro, probably by interfering with bacterial cell viability. Thanks to the combination of its osteoconductive, antibacterial and antibiofilm properties, BAG-S53P4 may be successfully used as a bone substitute for the treatment of bone and PJIs. Further studies will be designed to investigate the ability of BAG-S53P4 to inhibit bacterial adhesion, so as to prevent biofilm formation on prosthetic surfaces.

Funding

This work was supported by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Program (Project I.D.A.C.—Grant Agreement HEALTH-2011-277988).

Transparency declarations

None to declare.

References

1

Ballo
AM
,
Akca
E
,
Ozen
T
et al. .
Effect of implant design and bioactive glass coating on biomechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composite implants
.
Eur J Oral Sci
2014
;
122
:
303
9
.

2

Putzer
D
,
Fuchs
J
,
Coraca-Huber
D
et al. .
BAG-S53P4 as an additive to bone allografts: a laboratory study using an uniaxial compression test
.
J Orthop Res
2015
; .

3

Lindfors
NC
,
Hyvönen
P
,
Nyyssönen
M
et al. .
Bioactive glass S53P4 as bone graft substitute in treatment of osteomyelitis
.
Bone
2010
;
47
:
212
8
.

4

Pernaa
K
,
Koski
I
,
Mattila
K
et al. .
Bioactive glass S53P4 and autograft bone in treatment of depressed tibial plateau fractures—a prospective randomized 11-year follow-up
.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants
2011
;
21
:
139
48
.

5

Rantakokko
J
,
Frantzén
JP
,
Heinänen
J
et al. .
Posterolateral spondylosis using bioactive glass S53P4 and autogenous bone in instrumented unstable lumbar spine burst fractures. A prospective 10-year follow-up study
.
Scand J Surg
2012
;
101
:
66
71
.

6

Drago
L
,
Romanò
D
,
De Vecchi
E
et al. .
Bioactive glass BAG-S53P4 for the adjunctive treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the long bones: an in vitro and prospective clinical study
.
BMC Infect Dis
2013
;
13
:
584
.

7

McAndrew
J
,
Efrimescu
C
,
Sheehan
E
et al. .
Through the looking glass; bioactive glass S53P4 (BonAlive®) in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis
.
Ir J Med Sci
2013
;
182
:
509
11
.

8

Romanò
CL
,
Logoluso
N
,
Meani
E
et al. .
A comparative study of the use of bioactive glass S53P4 and antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a retrospective comparative study
.
Bone Joint J
2014
;
96-B
:
845
50
.

9

Stoor
P
,
Mesimäki
K
,
Lindqvist
C
et al. .
The use of anatomically drop-shaped bioactive glass S53P4 implants in the reconstruction of orbital floor fractures—a prospective long-term follow-up study
.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
2015
;
43
:
969
75
.

10

Munukka
E
,
Leppäranta
O
,
Korkeamäki
M
et al. .
Bactericidal effects of bioactive glasses on clinically important aerobic bacteria
.
J Mater Sci Mater Med
2008
;
19
:
27
32
.

11

Detsch
R
,
Stoor
P
,
Grünewald
A
et al. .
Increase in VEGF secretion from human fibroblast cells by bioactive glass S53P4 to stimulate angiogenesis in bone
.
J Biomed Mater Res A
2014
;
102
:
4055
61
.

12

Gergely
I
,
Zazgyva
A
,
Man
A
et al. .
The in vitro antibacterial effect of S53P4 bioactive glass and gentamicin impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads
.
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung
2014
;
61
:
145
60
.

13

Zhang
D
,
Hupa
M
,
Hupa
L
.
In situ pH within particle beds of bioactive glasses
.
Acta Biomater
2008
;
4
:
1498
505
.

14

Zhang
D
,
Leppäranta
O
,
Munukka
E
et al. .
Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bioactive glasses
.
J Biomed Mater Res A
2010
;
93
:
475
83
.

15

Coraça-Huber
DC
,
Fille
M
,
Hausdorfer
J
et al. .
Efficacy of antibacterial bioactive glass S53P4 against S. aureus biofilms grown on titanium discs in vitro
.
J Orthop Res
2014
;
32
:
175
7
.

16

Drago
L
,
Vassena
C
,
Fenu
S
et al. .
In vitro antibiofilm activity of bioactive glass S53P4
.
Future Microbiol
2014
;
9
:
593
601
.

17

Christensen
GD
,
Simpson
WA
,
Younger
JJ
et al. .
Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices
.
J Clin Microbiol
1985
;
22
:
996
1006
.

18

Vassena
C
,
Fenu
S
,
Giuliani
F
et al. .
Photodynamic antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of RLP068/Cl against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa forming biofilms on prosthetic material
.
Int J Antimicrob Agents
2014
;
44
:
47
55
.

19

McLean
RJ
,
Lam
JS
,
Graham
LL
.
Training the biofilm generation—a tribute to J W Costerton
.
J Bacteriol
2012
;
194
:
6706
11
.

20

Williams
DL
,
Costerton
JW
.
Using biofilms as initial inocula in animal models of biofilm-related infections
.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
2012
;
100
:
1163
9
.

21

Rochford
ET
,
Richards
RG
,
Moriarty
TF
.
Influence of material on the development of device-associated infections
.
Clin Microbiol Infect
2012
;
18
:
1162
7
.

22

Taylor
PK
,
Yeung
AT
,
Hancock
RE
.
Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: towards the development of novel anti-biofilm therapies
.
J Biotechnol
2014
;
191
:
121
30
.

23

Drago
L
,
De Vecchi
E
,
Bortolin
M
et al. .
Antimicrobial activity and resistance selection of different bioglass formulations against multidrug resistant strains
.
Future Microbiol
2015
;
31
:
1
7
.

24

Xavier
JB
,
Picioreanu
C
,
Rani
SA
.
Biofilm-control strategies based on enzymic disruption of the extracellular polymeric substance matrix—a modelling study
.
Microbiology
2005
;
151
:
3817
32
.

25

Badave
GK
,
Kulkarni
D
.
Biofilm producing multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: an emerging challenge
.
J Clin Diagn Res
2015
;
9
:
DC08
10
.