Abstract

Objectives

Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic granulomatosis diagnosed mainly in young adults. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT is useful in sarcoidosis cases to search for a biopsiable site or assess disease activity.18F-FDG PET/CT can reveal bone hypermetabolism in sarcoidosis patients, even in the absence of osteoarticular symptoms. The aim of this study was to describe metabolic bone involvement in sarcoidosis patients and to evaluate its prognostic impact.

Methods

This was an observational, comparative, retrospective, monocentric study. Inclusion criteria were a confirmed diagnosis of sarcoidosis according to the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Diseases (WASOG) criteria and at least one 18F-FDG PET/CT scan during follow-up. Metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis was defined as focal bone hypermetabolism with no argument for a differential diagnosis of bone 18F-FDG uptake. Patients with and without bone involvement were compared.

Results

Among the 175 included patients, 32 (18%) had metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis. The metabolic bone involvement was mainly axial and mostly without bone abnormalities on CT. Metabolic bone involvement was associated with intrathoracic and extrathoracic lymph node involvement and with a greater number of organs involved. Patients with metabolic bone involvement more frequently received corticosteroids, methotrexate and TNF-α inhibitors and a greater number of treatments. Relapse of sarcoidosis occurred sooner in patients with metabolic bone involvement.

Conclusion

These results suggest that metabolic bone involvement is associated with more diffuse and more severe sarcoidosis.

Rheumatology key messages
  • Patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis had a greater number of organs involved.

  • Patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis received more treatments.

  • Patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis had a shorter time to relapse.

Introduction

Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic granulomatosis primarily affecting the lungs and lymph nodes in young patients [1, 2]. Bone involvement has been reported in 3–30% of sarcoidosis patients, depending on the imaging modality and organ involvement definition [3, 4]. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT has emerged as a valuable tool for sarcoidosis assessment [5–7]. 18F-FDG PET/CT use in sarcoidosis includes identification of biopsiable lesions [1, 8], assessment of myocardial involvement [9–11] and evaluation of organ-specific disease activity [12–17]. 18F-FDG PET/CT can reveal bone involvement in sarcoidosis even in asymptomatic patients [4, 18–21]. Bone involvement of sarcoidosis was initially described as lytic, pseudocystic, permeative or destructive on X-ray imaging, primarily affecting distal bones of the hands and feet [22, 23]. 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation of sarcoidosis patients revealed a higher prevalence of bone lesions than previously believed, presenting as bone hypermetabolism often without CT abnormalities, more often involving the axial skeleton and long bones [24–27]. Radiographic bone lesions are a recognized adverse prognostic factor during the sarcoidosis course, as they have been associated with a more chronic evolution of the disease [5, 28]. However, the prognostic value of bone hypermetabolism during sarcoidosis has not been well evaluated. In addition, few data on the evolution of bone hypermetabolism under treatment are available.

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of bone hypermetabolism, describe radiologic lesions associated with bone hypermetabolism, compare the characteristics of patients with and without metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis and evaluate the impact of metabolic bone involvement on treatments and outcomes.

Patients and methods

Patients and study design

This was an observational, comparative, retrospective, monocentric study of prospectively collected data. Patients followed in a single tertiary care centre specializing in sarcoidosis in France were screened for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis through the French information system medicalization program, which records the medical codes of hospitalized patients (PMSI codes D86, G532 and/or M633). Medical records were manually reviewed to assess the sarcoidosis diagnosis. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of sarcoidosis according to the definition of the joint statement of the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society and World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Diseases (WASOG), including histological documentation of non-caseating granuloma and at least one 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was available at any time in the sarcoidosis course [5]. Exclusion criteria were lack of sufficient data, lack of histological documentation of granuloma, Löfgren syndrome or absence of sarcoidosis. The year of diagnosis was defined as the year of histological documentation of granuloma. Demographic, clinical, biological and radiological data, treatments and follow-up data were extracted from medical records.

In France, retrospective and monocentric studies based on information drawn from medical records do not require approval by institutional review boards. The study was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and European legislation on personal data protection.

18F-FDG PET/CT data and analysis

All 18F-FDG PET/CT reports were manually reviewed for bone 18F-FDG uptake. 18F-FDG PET/CT exams with bone 18F-FDG uptake were reassessed by a nuclear medicine physician, allowing confirmation and classification of bone 18F-FDG uptake and exclusion of bone uptake differential diagnoses. Bone hypermetabolism was classified as focal or diffuse. Bone uptake differential diagnoses were defined by the presence of features typical of osteoarthritis, fracture, osteonecrosis or any otherwise documented bone disease. Standardized uptake values were not analysed because of the diversity of 18F-FDG PET/CT acquisition parameters.

18F-FDG PET/CT exams with focal bone hypermetabolism were further reassessed by an osteoarticular radiologist and screened for abnormalities in bone structure on CT images at hypermetabolic locations. Structural bone lesions were defined in the area of hypermetabolic locations as abnormal segmental hypodense and/or hyperdense bone images compared with the surrounding bone that did not qualify as bone uptake differential diagnoses.

Definition of metabolic and structural bone involvement in sarcoidosis

Metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis was defined as focal bone hypermetabolism with no bone uptake differential diagnosis, thereby fulfilling the criteria for ‘at least probable’ bone sarcoidosis according to the 2014 WASOG organ definition criteria [29]. Structural bone involvement of sarcoidosis was defined as the presence of structural bone lesions at hypermetabolic locations. Patients with diffuse bone hypermetabolism were not considered to have metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis.

Radiological features of the metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis were assessed. Metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis was classified as axial when involving the skull, spine, sacrum, pelvis, sternum, clavicle, scapula or ribs and as appendicular otherwise. It was classified as monostotic when it involved one bone and as polyostotic when it involved two or more bones. Structural bone involvement was further classified as lytic, condensing and mixed when hypodense and hyperdense images coexisted.

Comparison of patients with and without bone involvement of sarcoidosis

Patients with and without metabolic bone involvement at any point in the disease history were compared regarding extraosseous organ involvement of sarcoidosis according to the 2014 WASOG definitions for organ involvement at any time during the disease and treatments received at any time during the disease [29].

Systemic outcomes of bone sarcoidosis involvement

Patients with available follow-up data were assessed for sarcoidosis relapse. An event was considered as sarcoidosis relapse when it was considered and treated as a sarcoidosis relapse in the medical records, there was at least one objective (biological, radiological and/or histological) element of progression and appropriate explorations were performed to exclude differential diagnoses when relapse presentation differed from the initial presentation at diagnosis of sarcoidosis. The occurrence of sarcoidosis relapse and time from diagnosis to relapse were assessed. Patients with and without metabolic bone involvement were compared.

Metabolic outcomes of bone sarcoidosis involvement

Additionally, evolution of metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis under treatment was assessed in all patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis and 18F-FDG PET/CT follow-up by comparing the first 18F-FDG PET/CT with metabolic bone involvement with the last 18F-FDG PET/CT available under treatment. Evolution was classified as complete remission, partial remission, stability or progression. The evolution of structural bone involvement of sarcoidosis under treatment in patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT follow-up and structural bone involvement of sarcoidosis at any time during the disease was similarly classified.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as number (%) and numerical variables are presented as median [interquartile range (IQR)] or mean (s.d.). Patients with and without metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis were compared using R version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Comparisons were made using the Fisher’s test and Mann–Whitney test as appropriate. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated, with and without adjustment for gender, age and disease duration. Relapse-free survival was presented using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between groups using the logrank test. All tests were bilateral and P-values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Patients and study design

Among 498 screened patients, 233 (47%) had a confirmed sarcoidosis diagnosis (Fig. 1). Among the 233 patients, 175 (75%) with at least one 18F-FDG PET/CT scan were included. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mean age at diagnosis was 42 years (s.d. 14) and the female:male ratio was 0.93.

Flow chart of 498 patients screened for sarcoidosis through the French information system medicalization program
Figure 1.

Flow chart of 498 patients screened for sarcoidosis through the French information system medicalization program

Table 1.

Demographic and follow-up characteristics of 175 patients with sarcoidosis and 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation

CharacteristicsTotal (N = 175)Metabolic bone involvement (n = 32)No metabolic bone involvement (n = 143)
Gender (male), n (%)91 (52)14 (44)77 (54)
Age at diagnosis (years), mean (s.d.)42 (14)46 (15)41 (14)
18F-FDG PET/CT exams, n, mean (s.d.)2.3 (1.9)3.1 (2.6)2.1 (1.6)
Follow-upa, years, mean (s.d.)8.5 (7.4)8.4 (6.6)8.6 (7.6)
CharacteristicsTotal (N = 175)Metabolic bone involvement (n = 32)No metabolic bone involvement (n = 143)
Gender (male), n (%)91 (52)14 (44)77 (54)
Age at diagnosis (years), mean (s.d.)42 (14)46 (15)41 (14)
18F-FDG PET/CT exams, n, mean (s.d.)2.3 (1.9)3.1 (2.6)2.1 (1.6)
Follow-upa, years, mean (s.d.)8.5 (7.4)8.4 (6.6)8.6 (7.6)
a

Follow-up refers to the time from diagnosis to the last medical visit.

Table 1.

Demographic and follow-up characteristics of 175 patients with sarcoidosis and 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation

CharacteristicsTotal (N = 175)Metabolic bone involvement (n = 32)No metabolic bone involvement (n = 143)
Gender (male), n (%)91 (52)14 (44)77 (54)
Age at diagnosis (years), mean (s.d.)42 (14)46 (15)41 (14)
18F-FDG PET/CT exams, n, mean (s.d.)2.3 (1.9)3.1 (2.6)2.1 (1.6)
Follow-upa, years, mean (s.d.)8.5 (7.4)8.4 (6.6)8.6 (7.6)
CharacteristicsTotal (N = 175)Metabolic bone involvement (n = 32)No metabolic bone involvement (n = 143)
Gender (male), n (%)91 (52)14 (44)77 (54)
Age at diagnosis (years), mean (s.d.)42 (14)46 (15)41 (14)
18F-FDG PET/CT exams, n, mean (s.d.)2.3 (1.9)3.1 (2.6)2.1 (1.6)
Follow-upa, years, mean (s.d.)8.5 (7.4)8.4 (6.6)8.6 (7.6)
a

Follow-up refers to the time from diagnosis to the last medical visit.

18F-FDG PE/-CT data and analysis

A total of 395 18F-FDG PET/CT exams of the 175 included patients were reviewed. Bone 18F-FDG uptake was found in 45 patients. Among these, 41 patients had focal bone hypermetabolism and 4 patients had diffuse bone hypermetabolism. Among the 41 patients with focal bone hypermetabolism, bone uptake differential diagnoses were found in 9 patients: 1 patient, Paget’s disease of bone; 1 patient, fibrous dysplasia of bone; 1 patient, lymphoma; 2 patients, hip osteonecrosis; 1 patient, rib fracture; 1 patient, synovial herniation pit; and 2 patients, osteoarthritis. Thus a total of 32 of 175 patients (18%) were diagnosed with bone involvement of sarcoidosis.

The characteristics of metabolic bone involvement in sarcoidosis are shown in Table 2. 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters included full-body acquisition in 17 of the 32 patients (53%). Among the 32 patients with metabolic bone involvement, axial involvement was found in 25 patients (78%) and appendicular involvement was found in 7 patients (22%). Metabolic bone involvement was polyostotic in 26 patients (81%). Nine of the 32 patients had structural bone involvement (28%). Lytic lesions were found in seven patients, condensing lesions in four patients and a mixed lesion in one patient. An example of a hypermetabolic and structural humeral lesion is shown in Fig. 2. Metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis was never isolated, as it coexisted with extraosseous 18F-FDG uptake in all patients, including 31 (97%) with lymph node 18F-FDG uptake.

Hypermetabolic and osteolytic bone lesion of the proximal humerus on 18F-FDG PET/CT in a patient with sarcoidosis (A) before and (B) after treatment with infliximab. Left: 18F-FDG PET; middle: CT; right: 18F-FDG PET/CT
Figure 2.

Hypermetabolic and osteolytic bone lesion of the proximal humerus on 18F-FDG PET/CT in a patient with sarcoidosis (A) before and (B) after treatment with infliximab. Left: 18F-FDG PET; middle: CT; right: 18F-FDG PET/CT

Table 2.

Topography of metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis in 32 patients

AreaMetabolic bone involvement (n = 32), n (%)
Axial involvement25 (78)
Skull2 (6)
Spine15 (47)
Sacrum8 (25)
Pelvis15 (47)
Sternum4 (12)
Clavicle2 (6)
Scapula5 (16)
Ribs12 (37)
Appendicular involvement7 (22)
Humerus3 (9)
Femur5 (16)
Hands/feet4 (12)
AreaMetabolic bone involvement (n = 32), n (%)
Axial involvement25 (78)
Skull2 (6)
Spine15 (47)
Sacrum8 (25)
Pelvis15 (47)
Sternum4 (12)
Clavicle2 (6)
Scapula5 (16)
Ribs12 (37)
Appendicular involvement7 (22)
Humerus3 (9)
Femur5 (16)
Hands/feet4 (12)
Table 2.

Topography of metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis in 32 patients

AreaMetabolic bone involvement (n = 32), n (%)
Axial involvement25 (78)
Skull2 (6)
Spine15 (47)
Sacrum8 (25)
Pelvis15 (47)
Sternum4 (12)
Clavicle2 (6)
Scapula5 (16)
Ribs12 (37)
Appendicular involvement7 (22)
Humerus3 (9)
Femur5 (16)
Hands/feet4 (12)
AreaMetabolic bone involvement (n = 32), n (%)
Axial involvement25 (78)
Skull2 (6)
Spine15 (47)
Sacrum8 (25)
Pelvis15 (47)
Sternum4 (12)
Clavicle2 (6)
Scapula5 (16)
Ribs12 (37)
Appendicular involvement7 (22)
Humerus3 (9)
Femur5 (16)
Hands/feet4 (12)

Description of patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis

Six patients underwent bone or bone marrow biopsy: two had a bone biopsy, which revealed granulomas in both individuals, and four had an unguided bone marrow biopsy, which revealed granulomas in one individual (Supplementary Table S1, available at Rheumatology online). The indication for systemic treatment was extraosseous or multisystemic involvement of sarcoidosis in 30 patients (94%) and bone involvement in 2 patients (6%).

No fracture was reported on bone lesions in patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis. However, one patient underwent preventive osteosynthesis of the femoral neck because of a lytic structural lesion considered at risk of fracture.

Comparison of patients with and without bone involvement of sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis organ involvement and treatments received by patients with and without metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis are shown in Table 3. Intrathoracic lymph node involvement was more frequent in patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis than in patients without [31 (97%) and 112 (78%), respectively; OR 7.5 (95% CI 1.5, 182.5), P < 0.001]. Extrathoracic lymph node involvement was also more frequent in this population [17 (53%) and 45 (31%); OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.1, 5.4), P < 0.04]. Other organ involvements did not differ significantly between the two groups. The number of organ involvements was significantly higher in patients with metabolic bone involvement than in patients without [median 5.5 (IQR 4.0–7.0) and 4.0 (3.0–5.0), respectively; P < 0.0001], as shown in Fig. 3.

Comparison between patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis and patients without metabolic bone involvement: (A) number of organ involvements, (B) number of treatments and (C) relapse-free survival. Bone+: patients with metabolic bone involvement; bone−: patients without metabolic bone involvement
Figure 3.

Comparison between patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis and patients without metabolic bone involvement: (A) number of organ involvements, (B) number of treatments and (C) relapse-free survival. Bone+: patients with metabolic bone involvement; bone−: patients without metabolic bone involvement

Table 3.

Sarcoidosis organ involvement and treatments received in 175 patients with sarcoidosis

CharacteristicTotal (N = 175)Metabolic bone involvement (n = 32)No metabolic bone involvement (n = 143)OR (95% CI)P-value
Number of organs, median (IQR)4.0 (3.0–5.2)5.5 (4.0–7.0)4.0 (2.0–5.0)NA<0.0001
Intrathoracic lymph nodes143 (82)31 (97)112 (78)7.5 (1.5, 182.5)<0.001
Extrathoracic lymph nodes62 (25)17 (53)45 (31)2.5 (1.1, 5.4)<0.04
Lung (all stages)121 (69)22 (69)99 (69)1.0 (0.4, 2.3)0.96
Lung (stage 4)15 (9)4 (13)11 (8)1.7 (0.4, 5.6)0.45
Heart26 (15)7 (22)19 (13)1.8 (0.7, 4.7)0.29
Muscle5 (3)2 (6)3 (2)3.1 (0.3, 21.6)0.36
Eye39 (22)4 (13)35 (24)0.5 (0.1, 1.3)0.09
Nervous system77 (44)13 (41)64 (45)0.8 (0.4, 1.8)0.67
Skin45 (26)9 (28)36 (25)1.2 (0.5, 2.7)0.74
Joints24 (14)8 (25)16 (11)2.6 (0.9, 6.8)0.10
Liver33 (19)8 (25)25 (17)1.6 (0.6, 3.9)0.38
Spleen18 (10)4 (13)14 (10)1.3 (0.3, 4.1)0.67
Kidney14 (8)1 (3)13 (9)0.4 (0.0, 2.0)0.13
Digestive tract5 (3)1 (3)4 (3)1.2 (0.0, 9.3)0.92
Hypercalcemia10 (6)2 (6)8 (6)1.2 (0.2, 5.2)0.89
Ear, nose, throat49 (28)13 (41)36 (25)2.0 (0.9, 4.5)0.11
Number of treatments, median (IQR)2.0 (1.0–3.0)3.0 (2.7–4.0)2.0 (1.0–3.0)NA<0.0001
Corticosteroids138 (79)32 (100)106 (74)NA<0.0001
Hydroxychloroquine31 (18)8 (25)23 (16)1.7 (0.7, 4.3)0.29
Methotrexate97 (55)28 (88)69 (48)7.2 (2.6, 25.9)<0.0001
Azathioprine27 (15)3 (9)24 (17)0.5 (0.1, 1.7)0.23
Mycophenolate17 (10)2 (6)15 (10)0.6 (0.1, 2.3)0.40
Ciclosporin3 (2)1 (3)2 (1)2.4 (0.1, 30.5)0.60
Cyclophosphamide22 (13)5 (16)17 (12)1.4 (0.4, 3.9)0.60
TNFi63 (36)22 (69)41 (29)5.4 (2.4, 12.9)<0.0001
Rituximab2 (1)0 (0)2 (1)NA0.15
Tocilizumab2 (1)1 (3)1 (1)4.5 (0.1, 179.4)0.45
CharacteristicTotal (N = 175)Metabolic bone involvement (n = 32)No metabolic bone involvement (n = 143)OR (95% CI)P-value
Number of organs, median (IQR)4.0 (3.0–5.2)5.5 (4.0–7.0)4.0 (2.0–5.0)NA<0.0001
Intrathoracic lymph nodes143 (82)31 (97)112 (78)7.5 (1.5, 182.5)<0.001
Extrathoracic lymph nodes62 (25)17 (53)45 (31)2.5 (1.1, 5.4)<0.04
Lung (all stages)121 (69)22 (69)99 (69)1.0 (0.4, 2.3)0.96
Lung (stage 4)15 (9)4 (13)11 (8)1.7 (0.4, 5.6)0.45
Heart26 (15)7 (22)19 (13)1.8 (0.7, 4.7)0.29
Muscle5 (3)2 (6)3 (2)3.1 (0.3, 21.6)0.36
Eye39 (22)4 (13)35 (24)0.5 (0.1, 1.3)0.09
Nervous system77 (44)13 (41)64 (45)0.8 (0.4, 1.8)0.67
Skin45 (26)9 (28)36 (25)1.2 (0.5, 2.7)0.74
Joints24 (14)8 (25)16 (11)2.6 (0.9, 6.8)0.10
Liver33 (19)8 (25)25 (17)1.6 (0.6, 3.9)0.38
Spleen18 (10)4 (13)14 (10)1.3 (0.3, 4.1)0.67
Kidney14 (8)1 (3)13 (9)0.4 (0.0, 2.0)0.13
Digestive tract5 (3)1 (3)4 (3)1.2 (0.0, 9.3)0.92
Hypercalcemia10 (6)2 (6)8 (6)1.2 (0.2, 5.2)0.89
Ear, nose, throat49 (28)13 (41)36 (25)2.0 (0.9, 4.5)0.11
Number of treatments, median (IQR)2.0 (1.0–3.0)3.0 (2.7–4.0)2.0 (1.0–3.0)NA<0.0001
Corticosteroids138 (79)32 (100)106 (74)NA<0.0001
Hydroxychloroquine31 (18)8 (25)23 (16)1.7 (0.7, 4.3)0.29
Methotrexate97 (55)28 (88)69 (48)7.2 (2.6, 25.9)<0.0001
Azathioprine27 (15)3 (9)24 (17)0.5 (0.1, 1.7)0.23
Mycophenolate17 (10)2 (6)15 (10)0.6 (0.1, 2.3)0.40
Ciclosporin3 (2)1 (3)2 (1)2.4 (0.1, 30.5)0.60
Cyclophosphamide22 (13)5 (16)17 (12)1.4 (0.4, 3.9)0.60
TNFi63 (36)22 (69)41 (29)5.4 (2.4, 12.9)<0.0001
Rituximab2 (1)0 (0)2 (1)NA0.15
Tocilizumab2 (1)1 (3)1 (1)4.5 (0.1, 179.4)0.45

Data are expressed as n (%) unless stated otherwise.

NA: not applicable.

Table 3.

Sarcoidosis organ involvement and treatments received in 175 patients with sarcoidosis

CharacteristicTotal (N = 175)Metabolic bone involvement (n = 32)No metabolic bone involvement (n = 143)OR (95% CI)P-value
Number of organs, median (IQR)4.0 (3.0–5.2)5.5 (4.0–7.0)4.0 (2.0–5.0)NA<0.0001
Intrathoracic lymph nodes143 (82)31 (97)112 (78)7.5 (1.5, 182.5)<0.001
Extrathoracic lymph nodes62 (25)17 (53)45 (31)2.5 (1.1, 5.4)<0.04
Lung (all stages)121 (69)22 (69)99 (69)1.0 (0.4, 2.3)0.96
Lung (stage 4)15 (9)4 (13)11 (8)1.7 (0.4, 5.6)0.45
Heart26 (15)7 (22)19 (13)1.8 (0.7, 4.7)0.29
Muscle5 (3)2 (6)3 (2)3.1 (0.3, 21.6)0.36
Eye39 (22)4 (13)35 (24)0.5 (0.1, 1.3)0.09
Nervous system77 (44)13 (41)64 (45)0.8 (0.4, 1.8)0.67
Skin45 (26)9 (28)36 (25)1.2 (0.5, 2.7)0.74
Joints24 (14)8 (25)16 (11)2.6 (0.9, 6.8)0.10
Liver33 (19)8 (25)25 (17)1.6 (0.6, 3.9)0.38
Spleen18 (10)4 (13)14 (10)1.3 (0.3, 4.1)0.67
Kidney14 (8)1 (3)13 (9)0.4 (0.0, 2.0)0.13
Digestive tract5 (3)1 (3)4 (3)1.2 (0.0, 9.3)0.92
Hypercalcemia10 (6)2 (6)8 (6)1.2 (0.2, 5.2)0.89
Ear, nose, throat49 (28)13 (41)36 (25)2.0 (0.9, 4.5)0.11
Number of treatments, median (IQR)2.0 (1.0–3.0)3.0 (2.7–4.0)2.0 (1.0–3.0)NA<0.0001
Corticosteroids138 (79)32 (100)106 (74)NA<0.0001
Hydroxychloroquine31 (18)8 (25)23 (16)1.7 (0.7, 4.3)0.29
Methotrexate97 (55)28 (88)69 (48)7.2 (2.6, 25.9)<0.0001
Azathioprine27 (15)3 (9)24 (17)0.5 (0.1, 1.7)0.23
Mycophenolate17 (10)2 (6)15 (10)0.6 (0.1, 2.3)0.40
Ciclosporin3 (2)1 (3)2 (1)2.4 (0.1, 30.5)0.60
Cyclophosphamide22 (13)5 (16)17 (12)1.4 (0.4, 3.9)0.60
TNFi63 (36)22 (69)41 (29)5.4 (2.4, 12.9)<0.0001
Rituximab2 (1)0 (0)2 (1)NA0.15
Tocilizumab2 (1)1 (3)1 (1)4.5 (0.1, 179.4)0.45
CharacteristicTotal (N = 175)Metabolic bone involvement (n = 32)No metabolic bone involvement (n = 143)OR (95% CI)P-value
Number of organs, median (IQR)4.0 (3.0–5.2)5.5 (4.0–7.0)4.0 (2.0–5.0)NA<0.0001
Intrathoracic lymph nodes143 (82)31 (97)112 (78)7.5 (1.5, 182.5)<0.001
Extrathoracic lymph nodes62 (25)17 (53)45 (31)2.5 (1.1, 5.4)<0.04
Lung (all stages)121 (69)22 (69)99 (69)1.0 (0.4, 2.3)0.96
Lung (stage 4)15 (9)4 (13)11 (8)1.7 (0.4, 5.6)0.45
Heart26 (15)7 (22)19 (13)1.8 (0.7, 4.7)0.29
Muscle5 (3)2 (6)3 (2)3.1 (0.3, 21.6)0.36
Eye39 (22)4 (13)35 (24)0.5 (0.1, 1.3)0.09
Nervous system77 (44)13 (41)64 (45)0.8 (0.4, 1.8)0.67
Skin45 (26)9 (28)36 (25)1.2 (0.5, 2.7)0.74
Joints24 (14)8 (25)16 (11)2.6 (0.9, 6.8)0.10
Liver33 (19)8 (25)25 (17)1.6 (0.6, 3.9)0.38
Spleen18 (10)4 (13)14 (10)1.3 (0.3, 4.1)0.67
Kidney14 (8)1 (3)13 (9)0.4 (0.0, 2.0)0.13
Digestive tract5 (3)1 (3)4 (3)1.2 (0.0, 9.3)0.92
Hypercalcemia10 (6)2 (6)8 (6)1.2 (0.2, 5.2)0.89
Ear, nose, throat49 (28)13 (41)36 (25)2.0 (0.9, 4.5)0.11
Number of treatments, median (IQR)2.0 (1.0–3.0)3.0 (2.7–4.0)2.0 (1.0–3.0)NA<0.0001
Corticosteroids138 (79)32 (100)106 (74)NA<0.0001
Hydroxychloroquine31 (18)8 (25)23 (16)1.7 (0.7, 4.3)0.29
Methotrexate97 (55)28 (88)69 (48)7.2 (2.6, 25.9)<0.0001
Azathioprine27 (15)3 (9)24 (17)0.5 (0.1, 1.7)0.23
Mycophenolate17 (10)2 (6)15 (10)0.6 (0.1, 2.3)0.40
Ciclosporin3 (2)1 (3)2 (1)2.4 (0.1, 30.5)0.60
Cyclophosphamide22 (13)5 (16)17 (12)1.4 (0.4, 3.9)0.60
TNFi63 (36)22 (69)41 (29)5.4 (2.4, 12.9)<0.0001
Rituximab2 (1)0 (0)2 (1)NA0.15
Tocilizumab2 (1)1 (3)1 (1)4.5 (0.1, 179.4)0.45

Data are expressed as n (%) unless stated otherwise.

NA: not applicable.

Patients with metabolic bone involvement received more corticosteroids [32 (100%) and 106 (74%), respectively; P < 0.0001], more methotrexate [28 (88%) and 69 (48%), respectively; OR 7.2 (95% CI 2.6, 25.9), P < 0.0001] and more TNF-α inhibitors (TNFis) [22 (69%) and 41 (29%), respectively; OR 5.4 (95% CI 2.4, 12.9), P < 0.0001]. The number of treatments received by the patients with metabolic bone involvement was greater than that received by the patients without metabolic bone involvement [3.0 (IQR 2.7–4.0) and 2.0 (1.0–3.0), respectively; P < 0.001], as shown in Fig. 3.

Adjustment for gender, age and disease duration did not significantly alter the results. Adjusted ORs and coefficient plots are available in Supplementary Table S2 and Figure S1, both available at Rheumatology online.

Systemic outcomes of bone sarcoidosis involvement

Follow-up data were available for all patients but two (1%), both without metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis relapse occurred during follow-up in 23 of the 32 patients (72%) with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis and in 68 of the 141 patients without (48%) [OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.2, 6.8), P < 0.02]. Kaplan–Meier curves of relapse-free survival are shown in Fig. 3. The median time to the first relapse was 61 months (IQR 48–84) and 96 months (IQR 73–156), respectively (P = 0.01).

Metabolic outcomes of bone sarcoidosis involvement

Among the 32 patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis, 16 had 18F-FDG PET/CT follow-ups. Complete remission of metabolic bone involvement on the last 18F-FDG PET/CT under treatment was observed in 12 of the 16 patients (75%) and partial remission was observed in 4 of them (25%). Structural bone involvement was present in six patients (37%), which was stable in five patients and progressed in one patient under treatment. Fig. 2 shows an example of hypermetabolic remission and structural stability of a humeral lesion after treatment with infliximab.

Discussion

In this retrospective study of 175 patients with sarcoidosis evaluated by 18F-FDG PET/CT, metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis was found in 18% of patients, mainly without structural bone lesions on CT, and these cases responded to sarcoidosis treatment. Metabolic bone involvement was found to be associated with more organ involvement, more systemic treatments (including methotrexate and TNFi, which are the main immunosuppressive drugs used in sarcoidosis) and more relapses and thus seems to have a strong prognostic value.

Characteristics of metabolic bone involvement

Metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis was found in 18% of patients, which is consistent with the estimated prevalence of 3–30% in recent studies [1–3]. It was predominantly axial, as reported in several studies [4, 19–21, 29]. However, only 53% of 18F-FDG PET/CT exams involved a full-body acquisition, which could have led to an underestimation of hand and foot involvement.

Structural lesions were found at the sites of bone 18F-FDG uptake in 31% of patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis, which is slightly more than the 0–6% reported in a recent series of comparable size [4, 21, 30]. These structural bone changes are thought to result from perigranuloma osteoclastic activation [23, 31, 32]. The fact that most patients did not have any structural lesions suggests that osteoclastic activation occurs inconstantly in patients with bone sarcoidosis or only in patients with advanced disease [4, 21].

Diffuse bone hypermetabolism has been associated with various other conditions that may occur in sarcoidosis patients (anaemia, hyperleukocytosis, biological inflammation, cancer, immunosuppressive therapy) and is not specific to sarcoidosis involvement [33, 34]. Focal bone hypermetabolism is also not specific, and CT may be useful to differentiate sarcoidosis involvement from other bone-uptake differential diagnoses. In our series, reviewing individual imaging data of patients with focal bone hypermetabolism revealed differential diagnoses for bone uptake in 22% of them, including osseous side effects of treatments and bone diseases other than sarcoidosis.

Metabolic bone lesions improved under treatment, which was retrospectively in favour of granulomatous lesions despite the histological documentation of bone lesions in a few patients. Two studies of sarcoidosis patients with seven follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT exams each, one retrospective and one prospective, also found results in favour of bone 18F-FDG uptake regression under treatment [18, 21]. Similar results have been reported for unbiopsied MRI bone lesions in patients with histologically proven sarcoidosis [3].

Prognostic outcomes

In this study, patients with metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis had more organ involvement, received more treatments and had more relapses. The higher number of organ involvements indicates a more multisystemic disease and has been reported in one of two other studies [19, 21]. However, in this study only intrathoracic and extrathoracic lymph node involvement were more frequent in patients with bone involvement, which was observed in one and four other series, respectively, but did not account for the received treatments [19–21, 30].

Patients with metabolic bone involvement received more corticosteroids, methotrexate, TNFi and other treatments than patients without bone involvement. One other study reported that patients with bone involvement were more likely to be treated with infliximab [19]. Bone sarcoidosis was the main indication of treatment in two patients, while in all other cases, treatments were guided by extraosseous or multisystemic organ involvement.

Patients with metabolic bone involvement had more sarcoidosis relapses, which could explain the greater number of treatments. Radiographic bone sarcoidosis documented on conventional X-ray imaging has been associated with chronic evolution of the disease for several years. Our results suggest that metabolic bone involvement in sarcoidosis, even without structural abnormalities on X-ray imaging, is an indicator of a more resistant and more chronic disease.

Limitations

Our study has several limitations. It was a retrospective, monocentric study. The study population notably involved 44% of patients with neurosarcoidosis. Only patients who had an indication for PET/CT were included, which constitutes a selection bias, as these patients often have a more severe disease.

There was histological evidence of bone sarcoidosis in only three patients. However, a recent study documented granulomas on bone biopsies in 35 of 35 patients with sarcoidosis who had positive 18F-FDG PET/CT or MRI findings evocative of bone involvement, which suggests that histology may not always be required [19].

Comparison of treatments was only made between molecules, which did not account for the heterogeneity of doses and durations of treatments. Finally, using stringent definition criteria for metabolic bone involvement could have underestimated its prevalence. However, it allowed the selection of patients with severe bone involvement.

Conclusion

In this retrospective study of 175 patients with sarcoidosis evaluated by 18F-FDG PET/CT, metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis, which was present in 18% of the patients, was associated with more organ involvement, more treatments and more relapses. Metabolic bone involvement of sarcoidosis could therefore reflect a more severe multisystemic involvement and chronic evolution of the disease. These findings could help clinicians adjust individual diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients with sarcoidosis.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Rheumatology online.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

A.B. and F.C.A. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No specific funding was received from any bodies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors to carry out the work described in this article.

Disclosure statement: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

References

1

Valeyre
D
,
Prasse
A
,
Nunes
H
 et al.  
Sarcoidosis
.
Lancet
 
2014
;
383
:
1155
67
.

2

Drent
M
,
Crouser
ED
,
Grunewald
J.
 
Challenges of sarcoidosis and its management
.
N Engl J Med
 
2021
;
385
:
1018
32
.

3

Johns
CJ
,
Michele
TM.
 
The clinical management of sarcoidosis a 50-year experience at the Johns Hopkins hospital
.
Medicine (Baltimore)
 
1999
;
78
:
65
111
.

4

Mostard
RL
,
Prompers
L
,
Weijers
RE
 et al.  
F-18 FDG PET/CT for detecting bone and bone marrow involvement in sarcoidosis patients
.
Clin Nucl Med
 
2012
;
37
:
21
5
.

5

Hunninghake
GW
,
Costabel
U
,
Ando
M
 et al. ;
ATS/ERS/WASOG Statement on Sarcoidosis
.
American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/World association of sarcoidosis and other granulomatous disorders
.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Off J WASOG
 
1999
;
16
:
149
73
.

6

Adams
H
,
van Rooij
R
,
van Moorsel
CHM
 et al.  
Volumetric FDG PET analysis of global lung inflammation: new tool for precision medicine in pulmonary sarcoidosis?
 
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Off J WASOG
 
2018
;
35
:
44
54
.

7

Kraaijvanger
R
,
Janssen Bonás
M
,
Vorselaars
ADM
,
Veltkamp
M.
 
Biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of sarcoidosis: current use and future prospects
.
Front Immunol
 
2020
;
11
:
1443
.

8

Lewis
PJ
,
Salama
A.
 
Uptake of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in sarcoidosis
.
J Nucl Med Off. Publ Soc Nucl Med
 
1994
;
35
:
1647
9
.

9

Youssef
G
,
Leung
E
,
Mylonas
I
 et al.  
The use of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis including the Ontario experience
.
J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med
 
2012
;
53
:
241
8
.

10

Chareonthaitawee
P
,
Beanlands
RS
,
Chen
W
 et al.  
Joint SNMMI-ASNC expert consensus document on the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cardiac sarcoid detection and therapy monitoring
.
J Nucl Cardiol Off Publ Am Soc Nucl Cardiol
 
2017
;
24
:
1741
58
.

11

Omote
K
,
Naya
M
,
Koyanagawa
K
 et al.  
18F-FDG uptake of the right ventricle is an important predictor of histopathologic diagnosis by endomyocardial biopsy in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis
.
J Nucl Cardiol Off Publ Am Soc Nucl Cardiol
 
2020
;
27
:
2135
43
.

12

Mostard
RLM
,
Vöö
S
,
van Kroonenburgh
MJPG
 et al.  
Inflammatory activity assessment by F18 FDG-PET/CT in persistent symptomatic sarcoidosis
.
Respir Med
 
2011
;
105
:
1917
24
.

13

Keijsers
RG
,
Verzijlbergen
EJ
,
van den Bosch
JM
 et al.  
18F-FDG PET as a predictor of pulmonary function in sarcoidosis
.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Off J WASOG
 
2011
;
28
:
123
9
.

14

Sobic-Saranovic
D
,
Grozdic
I
,
Videnovic-Ivanov
J
 et al.  
The utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis and adjustment of therapy in patients with active chronic sarcoidosis
.
J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med
 
2012
;
53
:
1543
9
.

15

Schimmelpennink
MC
,
Vorselaars
ADM
,
Veltkamp
M
,
Keijsers
RGM.
 
Quantification of pulmonary disease activity in sarcoidosis measured with 18F-FDG PET/CT: SUVmax versus total lung glycolysis
.
EJNMMI Res
 
2019
;
9
:
54
.

16

Keijsers
RGM
,
Grutters
JC.
 
In which patients with sarcoidosis is FDG PET/CT indicated?
 
J Clin Med
 
2020
;
9
:
E890
.

17

Papiris
SA
,
Manali
ED
,
Pianou
NK
 et al.  
18F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary sarcoidosis: quantifying inflammation by the TLG index
.
Expert Rev Respir Med
 
2020
;
14
:
103
10
.

18

Grozdic Milojevic
I
,
Sobic-Saranovic
D
,
Videnovic-Ivanov
J
 et al.  
FDG PET/CT in bone sarcoidosis
.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Off J WASOG
 
2016
;
33
:
66
74
.

19

Zhou
Y
,
Lower
EE
,
Li
H
,
Farhey
Y
,
Baughman
RP.
 
Clinical characteristics of patients with bone sarcoidosis
.
Semin Arthritis Rheum
 
2017
;
47
:
143
8
.

20

Ben Hassine
I
,
Rein
C
,
Comarmond
C
 et al.  
Osseous sarcoidosis: a multicenter retrospective case-control study of 48 patients
.
Joint Bone Spine
 
2019
;
86
:
789
93
.

21

Demaria
L
,
Borie
R
,
Benali
K
 et al.  
18F-FDG PET/CT in bone sarcoidosis: an observational study
.
Clin. Rheumatol
 
2020
;
39
:
2727
34
.

22

Neville
E
,
Carstairs
LS
,
James
DG.
 
Sarcoidosis of bone
.
Q J Med
 
1977
;
46
:
215
27
.

23

Wilcox
A
,
Bharadwaj
P
,
Sharma
OP.
 
Bone sarcoidosis
.
Curr Opin Rheumatol
 
2000
;
12
:
321
30
.

24

Yachoui
R
,
Parker
BJ
,
Nguyen
TT.
 
Bone and bone marrow involvement in sarcoidosis
.
Rheumatol Int
 
2015
;
35
:
1917
24
.

25

Bechman
K
,
Christidis
D
,
Walsh
S
,
Birring
SS
,
Galloway
J.
 
A review of the musculoskeletal manifestations of sarcoidosis
.
Rheumatology (Oxf Engl)
 
2018
;
57
:
777
83
.

26

Sparks
JA
,
McSparron
JI
,
Shah
N
 et al.  
Osseous sarcoidosis: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes—experience from a large, academic hospital
.
Semin Arthritis Rheum
 
2014
;
44
:
371
9
.

27

Ludwig
V
,
Fordice
S
,
Lamar
R
,
Martin
WH
,
Delbeke
D.
 
Unsuspected skeletal sarcoidosis mimicking metastatic disease on FDG positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy
.
Clin Nucl Med
 
2003
;
28
:
176
9
.

28

Neville
E
,
Walker
AN
,
James
DG.
 
Prognostic factors predicting the outcome of sarcoidosis: an analysis of 818 patients
.
Q J Med
 
1983
;
52
:
525
33
.

29

Judson
MA
,
Costabel
U
,
Drent
M
 et al.  
The WASOG sarcoidosis organ assessment instrument: an update of a previous clinical tool
.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Off J WASOG
 
2014
;
31
:
19
27
.

30

Papiris
SA
,
Manali
ED
,
Papaioannou
AI
 et al.  
Prevalence, distribution and clinical significance of joints, muscles and bones in sarcoidosis: an 18F-FDG-PET/CT study
.
Expert Rev Respir Med
 
2020
;
14
:
957
64
.

31

Rohatgi
P.
 
Osseous sarcoidosis
.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med
 
1992
;
13
:
468
88
.

32

Zisman
DA
,
Shorr
AF
,
Lynch
JP.
 
Sarcoidosis involving the musculoskeletal system
.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med
 
2002
;
23
:
555
70
.

33

Inoue
K
,
Goto
R
,
Okada
K
,
Kinomura
S
,
Fukuda
H.
 
A bone marrow F-18 FDG uptake exceeding the liver uptake may indicate bone marrow hyperactivity
.
Ann Nucl Med
 
2009
;
23
:
643
9
.

34

Inukai
J
,
Ohnishi
A
,
Tagawa
S
 et al.  
Diseases showing diffuse bone uptake on FDG-PET
.
J Nucl Med
 
2019
;
60
:
1155
.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)

Supplementary data

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.