Abstract

Identifying genes influenced by natural selection can provide information about lineage-specific adaptations, and transcriptomes generated by next-generation sequencing are a useful resource for identifying such genes. Here, we utilize a spleen transcriptome for the house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), an emerging model for sexual selection and disease ecology, together with previously sequenced avian genomes (chicken, turkey, and zebra finch), to investigate lineage-specific adaptations within birds. An analysis of 4,398 orthologous genes revealed a significantly higher ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions and significantly higher GC content in passerines than in galliforms, an observation deviating from strictly neutral expectations but consistent with an effect of biased gene conversion on the evolutionary rate in passerines. These data also showed that genes exhibiting signs of positive selection and fast evolution in passerines have functional roles related to fat metabolism, neurodevelopment, and ion binding.

Discovering genes influenced by natural selection is central for studying evolutionary processes. The ability to generate transcriptomes in almost any species of interest together with the development of tools for detecting selection provides means to identify such genes (Bonneaud et al. 2008; George et al. 2011). A commonly applied method is testing for selection using the ratio, numbers, and patterns of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitutions in coding regions. This approach has been shown to be efficient for discovering genomic regions, or functional classes of genes, selected in specific lineages (Kosiol et al. 2008; Künstner et al. 2010; Nabholz et al. 2011). Importantly, however, neutral forces affecting the fixation rate, such as biased gene conversion (BGC) (Marais 2003), can result in patterns similar to adaptive evolution or relaxed constraint. It is therefore crucial to investigate a potential role of such neutral forces in driving substitution patterns in different lineages before drawing conclusions on rates of adaptive evolution (Berglund et al. 2009). RNA-Seq also provides a cost-effective way to characterize transcriptomics without genome annotation (Wang et al. 2009) and for exploring how differences in life history among lineages can affect rates and patterns of genome evolution (Lynch 2007).

Birds are useful for studying selection and the influence of life history variation on patterns of genome evolution. Their abundance and ease of field study have yielded extensive data on a rich variety of phenotypic traits and behavior (Clutton-Brock and Sheldon 2010; Sætre G.P. and Sæther S.A. 2010). Pilot studies in avian comparative genomics have identified naturally selected genes (Axelsson et al. 2008; Nam et al. 2010) and estimated differences in selection intensity (Axelsson and Ellegren 2009; Künstner et al. 2010) among genes and in specific lineages, but in these studies a relatively small number of genes were analyzed across all species. Transcriptomes have been characterized in birds before, but these have not been used to conduct comparative analyses to investigate patterns of molecular evolution between bird lineages (Santure et al. 2011; Peterson et al. 2012).

Here, we utilize a novel spleen transcriptome for the house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus) together with three previously available avian genomes (turkey [Meleagris gallopavo], chicken [Gallus gallus], and zebra finch [Taeniopygia guttata]) (fig. 1) to 1) investigate whether changes in evolutionary rates and patterns of natural selection in different bird lineages can be explained by differences in life history traits as suggested by studies in mammals (Welch et al. 2008) and 2) identify genes that may have facilitated lineage-specific adaptations. As an oscine passerine (songbird), the house finch, together with the zebra finch (also a songbird) and the turkey provide important novel anchoring points for targeted searches for positively selected genes (PSG) and estimates of substitution rates at terminal and ancestral branches within passerines and galliforms—comparisons that have received little attention thus far.

A phylogenetic tree showing the taxa included in the study. The GC content and the ω (dN/dS) for the ancestral avian branch is given above and below the branch and in white and gray, respectively; arrows indicate increase (arrow up), decrease (arrow down), or approximate constancy (horizontal arrow) in these parameters for each subsequent branch. The bar plot at the bottom shows the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations (dN/dS or ω) for terminal and ancestral passerine and galliform branches, averaged across genes.
Fig. 1.

A phylogenetic tree showing the taxa included in the study. The GC content and the ω (dN/dS) for the ancestral avian branch is given above and below the branch and in white and gray, respectively; arrows indicate increase (arrow up), decrease (arrow down), or approximate constancy (horizontal arrow) in these parameters for each subsequent branch. The bar plot at the bottom shows the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations (dN/dS or ω) for terminal and ancestral passerine and galliform branches, averaged across genes.

Results

We analyzed the coding sequence of 4,398 gene orthologs, a gene set representing approximately 25% of previously annotated avian genes (ICGSC 2004). Averaged across all 4,398 genes, the zebra finch branch had a significantly higher ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions, ω, than the house finch (P = 6.3 × 1016), and terminal passerine lineages had a significantly higher average ω compared with terminal galliform lineages (P < 1016). Average ω was almost identical in the ancestral passerine and galliform lineages and was higher in terminal than in ancestral passerines branches, whereas ω was higher in the ancestral branch than in the terminal branches for galliforms (table 1 and fig. 1). To investigate a potential role of BGC on ω, we estimated the evolution of GC content across the six species using a nonhomogeneous model (Galtier and Gouy 1998; Boussau and Gouy 2006) and found that GC content has increased in the passerines and decreased in the galliforms from the avian ancestor (overall and third position GC content are given in table 1, fig. 1, and supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online).

Table 1.

The Estimated Substitution Rates for Synonymous Sites (dS), the Average Ratio of Nonsynonymous to Synonymous Substitutions (ω), Overall GC Content (GC), GC in Third Codon Positions (GC3) and the Number of Fast Evolving Genes (FEG) and Positively Selected Genes (PSG) and Number of Overlapping Genes between Classes FEG and PSG.

LineagedSω (dN/dS)GCGC3FEGPSGOverlapping
House finch0.0500.0640.510.5752101
Zebra finch0.0440.0760.510.5665348
Chicken0.0490.0560.470.514719120
Turkey0.0520.0600.460.514011115
Ancestral passerines0.1690.0610.500.56151291
Ancestral galliforms0.1480.0610.460.5137252
Ancestral avian0.2670.0690.490.5258240
LineagedSω (dN/dS)GCGC3FEGPSGOverlapping
House finch0.0500.0640.510.5752101
Zebra finch0.0440.0760.510.5665348
Chicken0.0490.0560.470.514719120
Turkey0.0520.0600.460.514011115
Ancestral passerines0.1690.0610.500.56151291
Ancestral galliforms0.1480.0610.460.5137252
Ancestral avian0.2670.0690.490.5258240
Table 1.

The Estimated Substitution Rates for Synonymous Sites (dS), the Average Ratio of Nonsynonymous to Synonymous Substitutions (ω), Overall GC Content (GC), GC in Third Codon Positions (GC3) and the Number of Fast Evolving Genes (FEG) and Positively Selected Genes (PSG) and Number of Overlapping Genes between Classes FEG and PSG.

LineagedSω (dN/dS)GCGC3FEGPSGOverlapping
House finch0.0500.0640.510.5752101
Zebra finch0.0440.0760.510.5665348
Chicken0.0490.0560.470.514719120
Turkey0.0520.0600.460.514011115
Ancestral passerines0.1690.0610.500.56151291
Ancestral galliforms0.1480.0610.460.5137252
Ancestral avian0.2670.0690.490.5258240
LineagedSω (dN/dS)GCGC3FEGPSGOverlapping
House finch0.0500.0640.510.5752101
Zebra finch0.0440.0760.510.5665348
Chicken0.0490.0560.470.514719120
Turkey0.0520.0600.460.514011115
Ancestral passerines0.1690.0610.500.56151291
Ancestral galliforms0.1480.0610.460.5137252
Ancestral avian0.2670.0690.490.5258240

To identify genes that might be candidates for lineage-specific adaptations, we focused on the following two gene sets: 1) genes that have experienced a higher ω in specific lineages in comparison with the rest of the tree (fast evolving genes [FEG]), and 2) genes that have specific codons influenced by positive selection only in a particular branch (PSG). In total, we identified 827 genes (18.8%) exhibiting signatures of selection somewhere in the bird tree (table 1). We found significantly more FEG in ancestral passerines than in ancestral galliforms (P < 1016), whereas no significant difference was observed for PSG at these branches. We also compared the terminal branches for passerines with those for galliforms and found slightly more FEG in passerines compared with galliforms, but significantly more PSG in galliforms than in passerines (P < 1016). A subset (n = 14) of genes was identified in both FEG and PSG and among these we identified gene functions related to fat metabolism (e.g., ZDHC16) and neurodevelopment (e.g., STXBP1 and EPHB3) in the terminal passerine lineages (supplementary tables S1 and Supplementary Data, Supplementary Material online).

After correcting for multiple testing, only two lineages (house finch and ancestral passerines) showed enrichment of specific gene ontology (GO) terms in any gene class, and only for FEG. Again, fat metabolism was an over-represented term in the house finch lineage and genes related to ion binding were over-represented in the ancestral passerines lineage (table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of the Over-Represented GO Terms in Different Lineages.

Lineage/Gene ClassCategory/GO IDGO TermAnnotatedSignificantExpectedP ValueCorrected P Value
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0006072Glycerol-3-phosphate metabolic process940.112.20e−61.18e−2
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0006071Glycerol metabolic process1640.193.00e−55.35e−2
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0019400Alditol metabolic process1640.193.00e−55.35e−2
House finch/FEGCC/GO:0009331Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase complex730.097.00e−55.12e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0046872Metal ion binding6664925.579.40e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0043167Ion binding6674925.619.90e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0043169Cation binding6674925.619.90e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0004872Receptor activity168186.455.40e−52.28e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0008270Zinc ion binding4413316.937.80e−52.64e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0046914Transition metal ion binding5113619.621.20e−42.90e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0005488Binding2,803123107.621.20e−42.90e−2
Lineage/Gene ClassCategory/GO IDGO TermAnnotatedSignificantExpectedP ValueCorrected P Value
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0006072Glycerol-3-phosphate metabolic process940.112.20e−61.18e−2
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0006071Glycerol metabolic process1640.193.00e−55.35e−2
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0019400Alditol metabolic process1640.193.00e−55.35e−2
House finch/FEGCC/GO:0009331Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase complex730.097.00e−55.12e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0046872Metal ion binding6664925.579.40e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0043167Ion binding6674925.619.90e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0043169Cation binding6674925.619.90e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0004872Receptor activity168186.455.40e−52.28e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0008270Zinc ion binding4413316.937.80e−52.64e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0046914Transition metal ion binding5113619.621.20e−42.90e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0005488Binding2,803123107.621.20e−42.90e−2

Note.—Only genes from the FEG class were significant and only in the house finch and the ancestral passerine lineages. Columns represent the given GO category and identification number (category/GO ID), GO term, the number of annotated genes within that term (annotated), the number of FEG detected (significant), the number of expected genes (see Extended Materials and Methods in supplementary information, Supplementary Material online) from the specific GO class (Expected), the significance level from the Fisher’s exact test (P value) and the level of significance after correcting for multiple tests with false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05 (corrected P value). MF, molecular function; CC, cellular component; BP, biological process.

Table 2.

Summary of the Over-Represented GO Terms in Different Lineages.

Lineage/Gene ClassCategory/GO IDGO TermAnnotatedSignificantExpectedP ValueCorrected P Value
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0006072Glycerol-3-phosphate metabolic process940.112.20e−61.18e−2
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0006071Glycerol metabolic process1640.193.00e−55.35e−2
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0019400Alditol metabolic process1640.193.00e−55.35e−2
House finch/FEGCC/GO:0009331Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase complex730.097.00e−55.12e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0046872Metal ion binding6664925.579.40e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0043167Ion binding6674925.619.90e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0043169Cation binding6674925.619.90e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0004872Receptor activity168186.455.40e−52.28e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0008270Zinc ion binding4413316.937.80e−52.64e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0046914Transition metal ion binding5113619.621.20e−42.90e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0005488Binding2,803123107.621.20e−42.90e−2
Lineage/Gene ClassCategory/GO IDGO TermAnnotatedSignificantExpectedP ValueCorrected P Value
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0006072Glycerol-3-phosphate metabolic process940.112.20e−61.18e−2
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0006071Glycerol metabolic process1640.193.00e−55.35e−2
House finch/FEGBP/GO:0019400Alditol metabolic process1640.193.00e−55.35e−2
House finch/FEGCC/GO:0009331Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase complex730.097.00e−55.12e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0046872Metal ion binding6664925.579.40e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0043167Ion binding6674925.619.90e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0043169Cation binding6674925.619.90e−75.58e−4
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0004872Receptor activity168186.455.40e−52.28e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0008270Zinc ion binding4413316.937.80e−52.64e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0046914Transition metal ion binding5113619.621.20e−42.90e−2
Ancestral passerine/FEGMF/GO:0005488Binding2,803123107.621.20e−42.90e−2

Note.—Only genes from the FEG class were significant and only in the house finch and the ancestral passerine lineages. Columns represent the given GO category and identification number (category/GO ID), GO term, the number of annotated genes within that term (annotated), the number of FEG detected (significant), the number of expected genes (see Extended Materials and Methods in supplementary information, Supplementary Material online) from the specific GO class (Expected), the significance level from the Fisher’s exact test (P value) and the level of significance after correcting for multiple tests with false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05 (corrected P value). MF, molecular function; CC, cellular component; BP, biological process.

Discussion

We utilized RNA-seq data from a wild bird species, the house finch, in combination with previously available vertebrate genome sequences, to provide novel insights into molecular evolution in birds, including lineage-specific and temporal variation in rate of adaptive evolution. Because of the difficulty of achieving sufficient statistical power when analysing large gene sets with a small number of species, whether estimating selection in genes using ω or testing for over-representation of GO terms among genes showing evidence for adaptive evolution, the gene set flagged here likely constitutes only a fraction of the genes that have been influenced by directional selection during the evolution of these lineages. Our list of adaptively evolving genes likely includes those genes showing strongest signals of selection, and we fully expect additional studies in birds to add to this list and to pinpoint more exactly the points in time when specific genes have been influenced by natural selection.

Both the absolute substitution rate and ω are influenced by a multitude of factors that affect the rate of mutation and the rate of fixation, including metabolic rate, generation time, and effective population size (Welch et al. 2008). Longevity, age of sexual maturity, and hence, generation time is on average longer in galliforms than in passerines (de Magalhaes and Costa 2009) and galliforms are significantly larger bodied than passerines (supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online, Dunning 2008), implying smaller effective population sizes for galliforms than passerines (White et al. 2007). Furthermore, both species of galliforms included in this study have been subject to strong artificial selection during domestication, which in theory could increase ω, either as a consequence of strong selection on domestication traits or via accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations due to low effective population size (relaxed constraint). The time scale of domestication seems too short for relaxed constraint to generate a significant effect in our study, where we compare very divergent lineages, but it is possible that rapid fixation of derived or initially rare nonsynonymous mutations in some genes can generate a signal of positive selection (cf. Rubin et al. 2012). As a consequence of the earlier mentioned factors, we expected the value of ω to be higher in galliforms than in passerines (cf. Welch et al. 2008). However, our data do not support this, instead suggesting that passerine lineages had a significantly higher average ω compared with galliform lineages. This observation contrasts with the situation in mammals, where there is a clear negative relationship between effective population size and ω (Welch et al. 2008), presumably driven by accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations.

Several previously suggested factors affecting evolutionary rates could account for differences in ω among bird lineages. If we accept that most novel nonsynonymous mutations are neutral or slightly deleterious (Eyre-Walker and Keightley 2007), this would imply that passerines have had on average smaller long-term effective population sizes than galliforms (Ohta 1992; Lynch 2007), that body temperature in passerines has been on average lower than in galliforms, thereby providing a less stringent thermal window for protein function (Mindell et al. 1996) or that protein evolution in passerines is part of a more general syndrome of fast evolution (Fitzpatrick 1988; Kochmer and Wagner 1988). A reasonable alternative is that a genomic force affecting the rate of fixation has altered the pattern and rate of amino acid substitution in birds as compared with mammals. One strong candidate of such factor is BGC. BGC mimics selection by favoring specific alleles (G and C over A and T) and the strength of the effect can vary among genomic regions with different recombination rates and/or different nucleotide composition (Berglund et al. 2009; Lartillot 2012). It is plausible that fixation of slightly deleterious nonsynonymous changes by BGC can over-ride purifying selection in lineages with larger effective population sizes and higher population recombination rates (Romiguier et al. 2010; Lartillot 2012). Our observation of a higher GC content in passerines than in galliforms confirms previous observations (Nabholz et al. 2011) and is consistent with BGC being a significant force in shaping evolutionary patterns in species with large population sizes (Welch et al. 2008). In addition, our data suggest that the GC content in the avian ancestor was lower than in the amniote ancestor, a trend that has been observed in other recent studies (Fujita et al. 2011).

We derived absolute substitution rates (synonymous substitutions [dS] per year) by applying the mean divergence time of all available estimates in timetree.org (Hedges and Kumar 2009) and found that the ancestral branches (both the branch leading to ancestral birds and the branches leading to passerines and to galliforms) had higher substitution rates than terminal branches. However, when evaluating the effect of different calibration points on absolute rates for the four nodes in the avian part of the tree (supplementary fig. S3, Supplementary Material online), we found that absolute rate estimate intervals were extremely wide in both galliforms and passerines, underscoring the need for further and more accurate calibration points within birds.

Our analyses yielded a list of 827 genes (18.8%) showing evidence of selection somewhere in the bird tree (table 1); some of these are briefly discussed here. We found genes related to fat metabolism, neurodevelopment, and ion binding to be positively selected and/or fast evolving in passerine lineages. With regard to fat metabolism, birds are known to have a unique ability to rapidly utilize fat as an energy resource (Butler and Woakes 1990), an adaptation to long-distance migration that is especially pronounced in small migratory passerines (Lundgren and Kiessling 1986; Jenni-Eiermann and Jenni 1991). For the categories neurodevelopment and ion-binding, there is no obvious link between lineage specific traits and gene function, but they constitute natural targets for further comparative and functional studies in passerines (Fidler et al. 2007; Mueller et al. 2011).

We chose the spleen because it produces diverse immune transcripts, data that can facilitate ongoing studies of host–pathogen interactions in the house finch (Bonneaud et al. 2011, 2012; Backström et al. 2013) but using transcriptomes from several tissues might increase the likelihood of identifying targets of natural selection. In addition, more taxon-rich data sets will soon be available. These too will increase the power to detect specific gene regions influenced by positive selection and BGC and ultimately will help clarify the genetic basis of lineage-specific adaptations in different avian clades (Kosakovsky Pond et al. 2011; Kumar et al. 2012).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR Grant: 2009-693) to N.B. for postdoctoral research, National Science Foundation (NSF Grant DEB-IOS 0923088) to G.H. and S.V.E., and Harvard University Milton Grant to S.V.E. The authors are grateful for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript, both from the subject editor and from three anonymous reviewers.

References

Axelsson
E
Ellegren
H
,
Quantification of adaptive evolution of genes expressed in avian brain and the population size effect on the efficacy of selection
Mol Biol Evol.
,
2009
, vol.
26
(pg.
1073
-
1079
)
Axelsson
E
Hultin-Rosenberg
L
Brandström
M
Zwahlén
M
Clayton
DF
Ellegren
H
,
Natural selection in avian protein-coding genes expressed in brain
Mol Ecol.
,
2008
, vol.
17
(pg.
3008
-
3017
)
Backström
N
Shipilina
D
Blom
MPK
Edwards
SV
,
Cis-regulatory sequence variation and association with Mycoplasma load in natural populations of the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus)
Ecol Evol.
,
2013
 
doi:10.1002/ece3.484
Berglund
J
Pollard
KS
Webster
MT
,
Hotspots of biased nucleotide substitutions in human genes
PLoS Biol.
,
2009
, vol.
7
pg.
e1000026
Bonneaud
C
Balenger
SL
Russell
AF
Zhang
J
Hill
GE
Edwards
SV
,
Rapid evolution of disease resistance is accompanied by functional changes in gene expression in a wild bird
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
,
2011
, vol.
108
(pg.
7866
-
7871
)
Bonneaud
C
Balenger
SL
Zhang
J
Edwards
SV
Hill
GE
,
Innate immunity and the evolution of resistance to an emerging infectious disease in a wild bird
Mol Ecol.
,
2012
, vol.
21
(pg.
2628
-
2639
)
Bonneaud
C
Burnside
J
Edwards
SV
,
High-speed developments in avian genomics
Bioscience
,
2008
, vol.
58
(pg.
587
-
595
)
Boussau
B
Gouy
M
,
Efficient likelihood computations with nonreversible models of evolution
Syst Biol.
,
2006
, vol.
55
(pg.
756
-
768
)
Butler
PJ
Woakes
AJ
Gwinner
E
,
The physiology of bird flights
Bird migration
,
1990
New York
Springer
(pg.
300
-
318
)
Clutton-Brock
TH
Sheldon
BC
,
Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies in ecology and evolutionary biology
Trends Ecol Evol.
,
2010
, vol.
25
(pg.
562
-
573
)
de Magalhaes
JP
Costa
J
,
A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits
J Evol Biol.
,
2009
, vol.
22
(pg.
1770
-
1774
)
Dunning
JB
Jr
CRC handbook of avian body masses
,
2008
Boca Raton (FL)
CRC Press
Eyre-Walker
A
Keightley
PD
,
The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations
Nat Rev Genet.
,
2007
, vol.
8
(pg.
610
-
618
)
Fidler
AE
van Oers
K
Drent
PJ
Kuhn
S
Mueller
JC
Kempenaers
B
,
Drd4 gene polymorphisms are associated with personality variation in a passerine bird
Proc Biol Sci.
,
2007
, vol.
274
(pg.
1685
-
1691
)
Fitzpatrick
JW
,
Why so many passerine birds? A response to Raikow
Syst Zool.
,
1988
, vol.
37
(pg.
66
-
76
)
Fujita
MK
Edwards
SV
Ponting
CP
,
The Anolis lizard genome: an amniote genome without isochores
Genome Biol Evol.
,
2011
, vol.
3
(pg.
974
-
984
)
Galtier
N
Gouy
M
,
Inferring pattern and process: maximum-likelihood implementation of a nonhomogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis
Mol Biol Evol.
,
1998
, vol.
15
(pg.
871
-
879
)
George
RD
McVicker
G
Diederich
R
Ng
SB
MacKenzie
AP
Swanson
WJ
Shendure
J
Thomas
JH
,
Trans genomic capture and sequencing of primate exomes reveals new targets of positive selection
Genome Res.
,
2011
, vol.
21
(pg.
1686
-
1694
)
Hedges
SB
Kumar
S
The timetree of life
,
2009
New York
Oxford University Press
ICGSC
,
Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution
Nature
,
2004
, vol.
432
(pg.
695
-
716
)
Jenni-Eiermann
S
Jenni
L
,
Metabolic responses to flight and fasting in night-migrating passerines
J Comp Physiol B.
,
1991
, vol.
161
(pg.
465
-
474
)
Kochmer
JP
Wagner
RH
,
Why are there so many kinds of Passerine birds? Because they are small
A reply to Raikow. Syst Zool.
,
1988
, vol.
37
(pg.
68
-
69
)
Kosakovsky Pond
SL
Murrell
B
Fourment
M
Frost
SD
Delport
W
Scheffler
K
,
A random effects branch-site model for detecting episodic diversifying selection
Mol Biol Evol.
,
2011
, vol.
28
(pg.
3033
-
3043
)
Kosiol
C
Vinar
T
da Fonseca
RR
Hubisz
MJ
Bustamante
CD
Nielsen
R
Siepel
A
,
Patterns of positive selection in six mammalian genomes
PLoS Genet.
,
2008
, vol.
4
pg.
e1000144
Kumar
S
Filipski
AJ
Battistuzzi
FU
Kosakovsky Pond
SL
Tamura
K
,
Statistics and truth in phylogenomics
Mol Biol Evol.
,
2012
, vol.
29
(pg.
457
-
472
)
Künstner
A
Wolf
JBW
Backström
N
et al. ,
(13 co-authors)
.
,
Comparative genomics based on massive parallel transcriptome sequencing reveals patterns of substitution and selection across 11 bird species
Mol Ecol.
,
2010
, vol.
19
(pg.
266
-
276
)
Lartillot
N
,
Phylogenetic patterns of GC-biased gene conversion in placental mammals and the evolutionary dynamics of recombination landscapes
Mol Biol Evol.
 
Advance Access published October 18, 2012, doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss239
Lundgren
BO
Kiessling
K-H
,
Catabolic enzyme activities in the pectoralis muscle of premigratory and migratory juvenile reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus (Herin.)
Oecologia
,
1986
, vol.
68
(pg.
529
-
532
)
Lynch
M
The origins of genome architecture
,
2007
Sunderland (MA)
Sinauer Associates
Marais
G
,
Biased gene conversion: implications for genome and sex evolution
Trends Genet.
,
2003
, vol.
19
(pg.
330
-
338
)
Mindell
DP
Knight
A
Baer
CF
Hiuddleston
J
,
Slow rates of molecular evolution in birds and the metabolic rate and body temperature hypotheses
Mol Biol Evol.
,
1996
, vol.
13
(pg.
422
-
426
)
Mueller
JC
Pulido
F
Kempenaers
B
,
Identification of a gene associated with avian migratory behaviour
Proc Roy Soc B.
,
2011
, vol.
278
(pg.
2848
-
2856
)
Nabholz
B
Kunstner
A
Wang
R
Jarvis
ED
Ellegren
H
,
Dynamic evolution of base composition: causes and consequences in avian phylogenomics
Mol Biol Evol.
,
2011
, vol.
28
(pg.
2197
-
2210
)
Nam
K
Mugal
C
Nabholz
B
et al. ,
(12 co-authors)
.
,
Molecular evolution of genes in avian genomes
Genome Biol.
,
2010
, vol.
11
pg.
R68
Ohta
T
,
The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution
Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst.
,
1992
, vol.
23
(pg.
263
-
286
)
Peterson
MP
Whittaker
DJ
Ambreth
S
et al. ,
(12 co-authors)
.
,
De novo transcriptome sequencing in a songbird, the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis)—genomic tools for an ecological model system
BMC Genomics
,
2012
, vol.
13
pg.
305
Romiguier
J
Ranwez
V
Douzery
EJ
Galtier
N
,
Contrasting GC-content dynamics across 33 mammalian genomes: relationship with life-history traits and chromosome sizes
Genome Res.
,
2010
, vol.
20
(pg.
1001
-
1009
)
Rubin
CJ
Megens
HJ
Martinez Barrio
A
et al. ,
(14 co-authors)
.
,
Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
,
2012
, vol.
109
(pg.
19529
-
19536
)
Sætre
GP
Sæther
SA
,
Ecology and genetics of speciation in Ficedula flycatchers
Mol Ecol.
,
2010
, vol.
19
(pg.
1091
-
1106
)
Santure
AW
Gratten
J
Mossman
JA
Sheldon
BC
Slate
J
,
Characterisation of the transcriptome of a wild great tit Parus major population by next generation sequencing
BMC Genomics
,
2011
, vol.
12
pg.
283
Wang
Z
Gerstein
M
Snyder
M
,
RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics
Nat Rev Genet.
,
2009
, vol.
10
(pg.
57
-
63
)
Welch
JJ
Bininda-Emonds
ORP
Bromham
L
,
Correlates of substitution rate variation in mammalian protein-coding sequences
BMC Evol Biol.
,
2008
, vol.
8
pg.
e53
White
EP
Ernest
SKM
Kerkhoff
AJ
Enquist
BJ
,
Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology
Trends Ecol Evol.
,
2007
, vol.
22
(pg.
323
-
330
)

Author notes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Present address: Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Associate editor: Michael Nachman

Supplementary data