Abstract

Molluscs in general, and bivalves in particular, exhibit an extraordinary degree of mitochondrial gene order variation when compared with other metazoans. Two factors inhibiting our understanding the evolution of gene rearrangement in bivalves are inadequate taxonomic sampling and failure to examine gene order in a phylogenetic framework. Here, we report the first complete nucleotide sequence (16,060 bp) of the mitochondrial (mt) genome of a North American freshwater bivalve, Lampsilis ornata (Mollusca: Paleoheterodonta: Unionidae). Gene order and mt genome content is examined in a comparative phylogenetic framework for Lampsilis and five other bivalves, representing five families. Mitochondrial genome content is shown to vary by gene duplication and loss among taxa and between male and female mitotypes within a species. Although mt gene arrangement is highly variable among bivalves, when optimized on an independently derived phylogenetic hypothesis, it allows for the reconstruction of ancestral gene order states and indicates the potential phylogenetic utility of the data. However, the interpretation of reconstructed ancestral gene order states must take in to account both the accuracy of the phylogenetic estimation and the probability of character state change across the topology, such as the presence/absence of atp8 in bivalve lineages. We discuss what role, if any, doubly uniparental inheritance (DUI) and recombination between sexual mitotypes may play in influencing gene rearrangement of the mt genome in some bivalve lineages.

Introduction

In the past decade, there has been an increased interest in gene arrangement of the mitochondrial (mt) genome. This is because the mt genome is a good model system to study genome evolution as it (1) has a relatively conserved gene content in most metazoans (but see Beagley, Okimoto, and Wolstenholme 1998), (2) is small in size, usually about 16 kilobases (kb), and (3) has well-studied processes including genetics and biochemistry (see Avise 2000 for review and other citations). Gene order of the mt genome can be used to investigate evolution of organisms and of their genomes by providing (1) characters that can be used in phylogenetic analysis of ancient lineages and (2) information that can be used to develop models for the mechanisms involved in gene rearrangement, replication, and regulation.

Until recently, studies on the gene order of the mt genome have been biased toward chordate taxa, which possess a similar gene arrangement; however in some invertebrate groups, gene order and genome content appears to be less conserved (see review in Boore 1999). The degree of invertebrate mt gene rearrangement appears to be variable across phyla and sometimes within a given phylum. In Arthropoda, the largest animal phylum, gene rearrangement generally appears to be limited to adjacent tRNA genes and areas surrounding noncoding (NC) regions (Boore 1999). For example, between the insect Drosophila and the chelicerate Limulus, gene order varies only in the placement of trnL (taa); there are no rearrangements among protein-coding or ribosomal genes (Staton, Daehler, and Brown 1997; Lavrov, Boore, and Brown 2000). Within specific arthropod lineages such as metastriate ticks (Black and Roehrdanz 1998), anomuran crustaceans (Morrison et al. 2001), and lice (Shao, Campbell, and Barker 2001), there is a greater amount of gene rearrangement that includes not only the translocation of tRNA genes but also protein-coding and occasionally rRNA genes. Although gene rearrangement is relatively limited in arthropods, gene order provides characters with sufficient phylogenetic signal to resolve relationships among distantly related lineages (Boore et al. 1995; Boore, Lavrov, and Brown 1998).

In contrast to the Arthropoda, Mollusca, the second largest animal phylum, displays an extraordinary amount of variation in gene arrangement. Currently, there are 12 complete and three incomplete mitochondrial genomes available on GenBank, representing four of the eight classes within the phylum (table 1). The two best-sampled classes are the gastropods and the bivalves. Four complete gastropod mt genomes are available, representing the pulmonates (Albinaria coerulea [Hatzoglou, Rodakis, and Lecanidou 1995] and Cepaea nemoralis [Terrett, Miles, and Thomas 1996]) and the opisthobranchs (Pupa strigosa [Kurabayashi and Ueshima 2000] and Roboastra europaea [Grande et al. 2002]), and one incomplete data set for the caenogastropod Littorina saxitilis (Wilding, Mill, and Grahame 1999). For bivalves, five complete mt genomes are available, including: Crassostrea gigas (S. H. Kim, E. Y. Je, and D. W. Park, personal communication; GenBank accession number NC_001276); the male and female mitotypes of Inversidens japanensis (M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication; GenBank accession numbers AB055624 and AB055625); the male and female mitotypes of Venerupis philippinarum (M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication; GenBank accession numbers AB065374 and NC_003354). In addition, there is a nearly complete mt genome for Mytilus edulis (Hoffman, Boore, and Brown 1992) and a partial mt genome for Pecten maximus (D. Sellos, M. Mommerot, and A. Rigaa, personal communication; GenBank accession number X92688).

Within the gastropods, the majority of gene rearrangement is restricted to tRNA genes among the pulmonates and opisthobranchs (Kurabayashi and Ueshima 2000; Grande et al. 2002). A more distinctive gene order is present in the partial mt genome sequence (8,022 bp) of the caenogastropod Littorina saxitilis (Wilding, Mill, and Grahame 1999), and gene translocation has be demonstrated to occur among five closely related caenogastropod species in the genus Dendropoma (Rawlings, Collins, and Bieler 2001). Even so, most gene boundaries are shared across the available gastropod sequences. Like arthropods, the relatively conserved gene order data in gastropods have been useful in phylogenetic reconstruction, providing evidence for a monophyletic Heterobranchia (Kurabayashi and Ueshima 2000; Grande et al. 2002), a monophyletic Cerithioidea (Lydeard et al. 2002), and phylogenetic relationships among closely related species in Dendropoma (Rawlings, Collins, and Bieler 2001).

Bivalves have the greatest amount of mt gene rearrangement, although this degree of variation may be an artifact of a wider taxonomic sampling in bivalves versus gastropods. Among the currently available taxa, there are very few shared gene boundaries (fig. 1) and gene translocation appears across all gene classes (protein-coding, tRNA, and rRNA). Genome content also varies among bivalve taxa due to apparent gene duplications and losses. Three of the four near-complete mt genome sequences (Crassostrea, Mytilus, and Venerupis) have duplicated tRNA genes. Crassostrea also has a duplicated rrnS, and Venerupis has a second tandem copy of cox2 of a different length.

In addition to the highly variable gene order and content of the mt genome, some bivalve lineages also have an unusual mode of inheritance for mtDNA, termed doubly uniparental inheritance (DUI) (Skibinski, Gallagher, and Beyon 1994; Zouros et al. 1994). Unlike most metazoans, these bivalves have two separate mtDNA lineages (two distinct and independent mt genomes) that appear to be segregated by sex and tissue type (but see Quesada, Skibinski, and Skibinski [1996] and Garrido-Ramos et al. [1998]). Males tend to be heteroplasmic, possessing both the female (F) and male (M) mitotypes, which are segregated between the somatic and gonadal tissues, respectively, whereas females usually are homoplasmic for the F-mitotype. Currently, DUI has been reported to occur within three disparate families: Mytilidae (Skibinski, Gallagher, and Beyon 1994; Zouros et al. 1994; Hoeh et al. 1996); Unionidae (Hoeh et al. 1996; Liu, Mitton, and Wu 1996); and Veneridae (Passamonti and Scali 2001), all of which are represented in this study. Comparison of F-mitotypes and M-mitotypes of Inversidens (Unionidae) and Venerupis (Veneridae) show limited differences in gene order and genome content and illustrate the independence of these sexual lineages.

Several models have been proposed to explain the mechanisms of gene translocation. The most familiar and accepted is the duplication and loss model, in which a portion of DNA is duplicated during replication, resulting in tandem copies of a gene or genome region. Once a disabling mutation arises in one of the gene copies, that copy is removed from the mt genome or reduced to noncoding sequence during subsequent replications. Recently, it has been proposed that gene loss may be a nonrandom process (Lavrov, Boore, and Brown 2002). There also may be an association between gene translocation and noncoding regions in the mt genome, especially the control region (CR) in vertebrates (Boore 1999). Two other less discussed models are the dimerization of two mt genomes and ‘illegitimate’ recombination between mt genomes (see description in Boore 2000). The general lack of knowledge for the mechanisms involved in gene translocation and genome rearrangement affects our interpretation of gene order data. Bivalves, with their great diversity, ancient lineages that span the Phanerozoic (Skelton and Benton 1993), and the observed variation in genome content should eventually provide a good system for modeling the mechanisms of gene movement.

In the present study, we determined the complete mtDNA sequence of the bivalve, Lampsilis ornata, a North American representative of the family Unionidae. In addition, we describe the notable features of the Lampsilis mt genome and compare these to other available bivalve taxa. Gene order of Lampsilis is examined in a comparative phylogenetic framework with five other bivalve sequences representing five families and four orders. Our examination of disparate gene arrangement indicates the potential phylogenetic utility of gene order and allows for the reconstruction of ancestral gene order states. Unique mechanisms that may be involved with gene translocation are discussed for Bivalvia.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and Amplification of the Mitochondrial Genome

High-molecular-weight mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was isolated (as described by Zardoya, Garrido-Pertierra, and Bautista 1995) from female Lampsilis ornata. To ensure that only the female mitotype was isolated, a single female was selected and only the somatic tissues were used for the procedure. After homogenization of fresh gill tissue, intact nuclei and cellular debris were removed by low-speed centrifugation. Mitochondria were then pelleted by high-speed centrifugation. mtDNA was removed from the organelle by alkaline lysis and treated with RNase, followed by a phenol/chloroform extraction. mtDNA was purified further with Microcon concentrators (Millipore) according to the manufacture's instructions.

The total length (∼16.0 kb) of L. ornata mtDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In brief, a small (∼500 bp) cox1 segment was amplified using primers from Folmer et al. (1994), following the protocol described in Roe and Lydeard (1998). New primers (COI-477F and COI-215R) were designed from sequence of the small cox1 segment, then used in long PCR (LA PCR kit TaKaRa) to amplify the remaining mtDNA region (∼16 kb). The resulting large fragment was purified with Microcon concentrators (Millipore) and used as template for cycle sequencing reactions. As a new sequence was generated, it was aligned to the original cox1 sequence fragment to create a continuous DNA strand (contig). New primers were designed from the ends of the contig. To quicken the process of sequencing, additional mitochondrial regions were utilized for primer design to create multiple origins of primer walking. Primers for three of these regions came from the following sources: rrnL (Lydeard, Mulvey, and Davis 1996), rrnS (White, Mcpheron, and Stauffer 1996), nad1 (Serb, Buhay, and Lydeard 2003), and cob (B. Bowen, personal communication). Original primers for this study were also designed from conserved sequence blocks within nad2, nad3, and nad4. Table 2 lists sequence and mt genome position of primers used in PCR and cycle-sequencing reactions. Sequence of the mt genome of Lampsilis ornata has been submitted to GenBank under the accession number AY365193. The voucher specimen is housed in the University of Alabama Unionid Collection under UAUC 3192.

Analysis of Sequence Data

Protein-coding genes were identified in the program MacVector version 7.0 (Oxford Molecular Group) using the similarity search option BlastX. The putative termini of protein-coding genes were inferred to be at the first in-frame start codon (L, I, M, or V) and the first in-frame stop codon. Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the protein-coding genes were aligned with homologous genes from other molluscs, annelids, and arthropods using the alignment option ClustalW (Thompson, Higgins, and Gibson 1994) in MacVector to provide additional support for putative start and stop codons in protein-coding genes. The 5′ and 3′ ends of the rrnS and rrnL were assumed to be adjacent to the flanking tRNA genes. Transfer RNA genes (tRNAs) were identified using the program tRNAscan-SE (version 1.1, http://www.genetics.wustl.edu/eddy/tRNAscan-SE [Lowe and Eddy 1997]) using the invertebrate mitochondrial codon sequence and setting the cove cutoff score to 1 or manually when tRNA genes were not recognized by this program. Potential secondary structure for identified tRNAs were determined in tRNAscan, which uses a consensus model when predicting secondary structure. Nucleotides that do not fit tRNAscan consensus models are indicated by lowercase letters.

To examine phylogenetic histories of gene arrangement, gene order was coded and the character states optimized on an independently derived topology. The program MacClade version 4.0 (Maddison and Maddison 2000) was used to parsimoniously assign character states to internal nodes according to information from the topology. The DELTRAN tracing option was chosen to select among the most-parsimonious reconstructions. This tracing method delays changes away from the root, maximizing parallelisms and minimizing reversals. Gene arrangement for each of the molluscan taxa and outgroups was coded by gene boundaries following Boore et al. (1995) and Boore and Staton (2002), where the character was the gene X being either immediately upstream or downstream of the character state gene Y. This method of coding also provides information on transcriptional orientation for each gene relative to its neighbor. For this analysis, two data sets were generated, one including and the other excluding tRNA genes. tRNAs were omitted from one data matrix to determine whether there was any phylogenetic signal associated with mtDNA protein-coding and ribosomal genes, which might be masked by the apparently higher observed rate of translocations of tRNA genes. Genome sequence of taxa with unusual mt genome content, such as an incomplete mt genome sequence or duplication and/or loss of genes, were reevaluated using the methods described above to verify previous authors' findings. Several changes in gene annotation were made for the gene order analysis. In Pecten, the second copy of trnK was reassigned as trnQ, and trnV was newly identified downstream of trnQ. In Crassostrea, five additional tRNA genes were identified, including trnS1, trnS2, a second copy of trnQ, and two undetermined tRNAs that are most likely trnA and trnF. All new putative tRNA genes are illustrated in figure 2. In the F-mitotype of Inversidens, a portion of atp8 was identified between trnD and nad4L based on amino acid similarity (table 3). All tRNA duplications in Mytilus, Venerupis, and Crassostrea and the duplication of rrnS in Crassostrea and cox2 in Venerupis were independently confirmed during our reevaluation. Character states of duplicated, nonadjacent genes (such as trnM in Mytilus) were examined in an attempt to identify the original and duplicated copy of the gene. However, since the majority of duplication codings resulted in autapomorphic character states for the given taxon and did not resolve the question of gene homology, we decided on a conservative approach where nontandem gene duplications were assigned as unknown (“?”) in the gene order matrix. Gene arrangement from only the F-mitotype was compared across bivalve taxa under the assumption that gender-specific mitotypes represented orthologous sequences (but see Results and Discussion). A traditional phylogeny of the sampled molluscan classes was used for this study (Salvini-Plawen and Steiner 1996) (fig. 3). Non-molluscan taxa included the arthropod Drosophila melanogaster (Lewis, Farr, and Kaguni 1995) and the annelid Lumbricus terrestris (Boore and Brown 1995). Relationships within Gastropoda were based on Kurabayashi and Ueshima (2000) and Grande et al. (2002). Bivalve relationships in the topology were based on a hypothesis resulting from a total-evidence approach of DNA sequences and morphology (Giribet and Wheeler 2002). Character states were reconstructed using the DELTRAN tracing option in MacClade. Unambiguous reconstructions that support a particular node were noted for bivalve taxa as an estimation of phylogenetic signal in the gene order data. Using only unambiguously reconstructed character states, rather than reconstructing states at equivocal nodes, is a conservative approach of examining gene order data. It is understood that the reconstructed ancestral state for a character is only an estimate and has a level of uncertainty that depends on the phylogeny estimation.

Gene order data were also analyzed phylogenetically in PAUP* version 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002) in an effort to find the optimal topology. Data from the incomplete sequences of Littorina and Pecten were excluded from the analyses. Both gene order data sets, including and excluding tRNAs, were analyzed using parsimony criteria and employing a heuristic search of 100 random-order addition replicates and tree bisection-reconstruction (TBR) branch swapping. Only minimum-length trees were retained, and zero-length branches were collapsed. Support for the individual nodes of the resulting phylogenetic hypotheses was assessed by bootstrap values using the FAST stepwise addition option (1,000 replicates) in PAUP*.

Results and Discussion

Organization and Structural Features of Lampsilis ornata mt Genome

Mitochondrial genome of Lampsilis ornata is 16,060 base pairs (bp) in length and has an A+T composition of 62.4%. All 37 of the genes typically found in the metazoan mt genome were identified in Lampsilis. The gene arrangement of L. ornata is unique to all other molluscan and metazoan mt genomes. Genes are arranged in the following order (bolded genes are translated from the opposite strand): nad4, nad4L, atp8, trnD, atp6, cox3, cox1, cox2, nad3, trnH, trnA, trnS2, trnS1, trnE, nad2, trnM, trnW, trnR, rrnS, trnK, trnT, trnY, rrnL, trnL2, trnN, trnP, cob, trnF, nad5, trnQ, trnC, trnI, trnV, trnL1, nad1, trnG, and nad6 (fig. 4). The two leucine and two serine tRNA genes are differentiated by their anticodon sequence: trnL1 = (cua), trnL2 = (uaa), trnS1 = (aga), and trnS2 = (uca). Typically, start codons in the mitochondrial invertebrate code vary between L (UUG), I (AUU, AUC), M (AUA, AUG), and V (GUG) amino acid codons. In Lampsilis, no protein-coding genes begin with L, three begin with I (nad1, nad4, and nad6), eight begin with M (cob, cox2, cox3, atp6, atp8, nad2, nad3, and nad5), and two begin with V (cox1 and nad4L). The two stop codons were utilized in the Lampsilis mt genome (UAA and UAG). Interestingly, there was only one occurrence of gene overlap between nad4 and nad4L, where the beginning of nad4 overlapped nad4L by seven nucleotides. Although gene overlap is not uncommon in animal mitochondrial genomes (e.g., Yamazaki et al. 1997; Boore and Brown 2000; Helfenbein, Brown, and Boore 2001), most occurrences are between tRNA genes. An alternative interpretation for the spatial relationship between the nad4 and nad4L genes could be the presence of a truncated stop codon, represented as a single T or TA, thus removing the putative overlap region. The sequences of these codons are completed by polyadenylation after transcript processing of the truncated stop codons (Ojala, Montoya, and Attardi 1981). The remaining protein-coding genes in the Lampsilis mt genome had complete stop codons.

Codon Usage and Codon Bias

A total of 3,717 amino acids are encoded by the Lampsilis mt genome (table 4). There is a codon bias for TTT (F) in Lampsilis, which is also present in Mytilus (Hoffman, Boore, and Brown 1992) but not in the gastropods Pupa (Kurabayashi and Ueshima 2000), Roboastra (Grande et al. 2002), and Albinaria (Hatzoglou, Rodakis, and Lecanidou 1995), where TTA (L) is the most abundant (comparisons only made with published data). Interestingly, in the most basal molluscan representative, Katharina, TTT (F) and TTA (L) are used equally frequently (Boore and Brown 1994). As more molluscan mt genomes are determined and analyzed, there may be evidence for historical constraint of codon usage across the phylum. All codons in each codon family occur in the Lampsilis mt genome. Excluding termination codons, TGC (C) and CGC (R) are used less than 10 times. This differs somewhat from Mytilus, where TGC (C) is more frequent. In Lampsilis mtDNA, codons ending in A or T are more frequent (67%) than those ending in G or C and reflect A+T base compositional bias (table 4).

Noncoding Regions in Lampsilis

There are as many as 28 noncoding (NC) regions found throughout the Lampsilis mt genome, ranging in size from 2 to 282 bp (fig. 4). The three largest NC regions are found between nad2-trnE (282 bp), trnQ-nad5 (230 bp), and nad5-trnF (136 bp). Of these, only the 136-bp NC region has an increased A+T composition (A+T = 76.8%), which is one characteristic typically used to identify origins of replication. The control region (CR), a noncoding region of DNA involved in replication of the mt genome, has not been identified in Lampsilis. Unlike vertebrates, the CR in invertebrates is not well characterized and lacks discrete, conserved sequence blocks used in identification (see Mytilus [Hoffman, Boore, and Brown 1992]). Multiple copies of the CR also have been documented in vertebrates (Kumazawa et al. 1998), which may further confound the identification of the origin of replication of the light (OL) and heavy (OH) strands in less well-studied organisms such as many invertebrate taxa. All bivalve sequences examined for this study had multiple NC regions throughout their mt genomes.

tRNA Secondary Structure

Twenty-two sequences that folded into tRNA-like secondary structures and possessed correct anticodon sequences were identified in Lampsilis (fig. 5). Nearly all of the putative Lampsilis tRNAs have a seven-member aminoacyl acceptor arm, a five-member anticodon stem (but see trnA, trnE, and trnG), and a seven-member anticodon loop. The anticodon loop of trnR is unusual, having only six members. A “?” marks the place in the loop that may be missing a base (fig. 5). In Lampsilis, both trnS1 and trnS2 have shortened DHU arm stems, where potential pairing consists of only one (G-T) or two (G-C, T-A) base pairs, respectively. These configurations for trnS are not shown in figure 5. This is not atypical, as the DHU arm of the trnS1 (AGN) is unpaired in many metazoan taxa (Garey and Wolstenholme 1989; Hoffman, Boore, and Brown 1992; Yamazaki et al. 1997; Tomita et al. 2002). The TψC arm loop is missing in the LampsilistrnC, but is present in Mytilus (Hoffman, Boore, and Brown 1992) and Katharina (Boore and Brown 1994); however, the length of TψC arm is variable in gastropods, where either the stem is missing or reduced (Yamazaki et al. 1997). Mispairing between bases in stems is consistent across several taxa. For example, the second base pair in the anticodon stem of trnW has a T-T mispairing in Lampsilis, Mytilus, and Katharina and a T-G pairing in several gastropods (Yamazaki et al. 1997).

Content Variation of Bivalve mt Genomes

Bivalves have much more variation in mt genome content than other sampled molluscs. Gene duplication and/or loss is present in almost every taxon in which a complete mt genome is available. For example, rrnS is duplicated in Crassostrea, and tRNA genes have been duplicated in Mytilus (trnM), Venerupis (trnM and trnV), and Crassostrea (trnQ). Hoffman, Boore, and Brown (1992) were the first to report that the protein-coding gene atp8 is absent in Mytilus, a condition that was only previously known to occur in nematodes (Okimoto et al. 1991). Subsequent studies have shown that other bivalves also lack this gene, including Crassostrea (S. H. Kim,E. Y. Je, and D. W. Park, personal communication) and Venerupis (M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication). Although atp8 is present in the Inversidens F-mitotype (identified during this study from M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication [see table 3]), it appears to be nonfunctional due to the presence of several stop codons after the first 31 amino acids. Interestingly, there does not appear to be an identifiable remnant of this gene in the male mitotype (M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication). In contrast, the other unionid, Lampsilis, is the only bivalve in this study that possesses a complete copy of atp8; however, this copy encodes a protein that is longer than the “typical” ATP8 by 13 extra amino acids on the C-terminus. At this time, it cannot be determined whether this gene copy is functional in Lampsilis.

Phylogenetic Implications of Mitochondrial Gene Arrangement in Bivalvia

Two gene order matrices, one including and one excluding tRNA genes, were constructed for the 13 molluscan and two distantly related outgroup taxa. There were 74 characters in the complete matrix and 30 characters when tRNA genes were excluded. Examination of gene arrangement when mapped onto the independently derived molluscan topology (fig. 3) showed several unambiguously reconstructed character states that support the Bivalvia and relationships within the class. The absence of atp8 was reconstructed as the ancestral condition of Bivalvia in both gene order data sets. Another putative ancestral state for Bivalvia was a shared gene boundary between of rrnL-cob when excluding tRNAs from the data matrix. Adjacent trnG and trnN genes are reconstructed as the ancestral character state for the clade containing Crassostrea, Pecten, and Mytilus. This clade was not supported unambiguously when excluding tRNA genes from the analysis. The Unionidae (Lampsilis + Inversidens) was supported by multiple synapomorphies and unambiguous character state reconstructions in both data sets (see below for description), including the presence of atp8 (fig. 6). The placement of Venerupis on the independently derived topology was not supported with either gene order data set. Each of the bivalve taxa has many autapomorphic characters, illustrating the number of unique gene boundaries. Figure 6 lists unambiguously reconstructed ancestral gene order conditions within Bivalvia.

More unambiguously reconstructed changes were observed in the gene order data when tRNAs were included, which was surprising since it has been suggested that the secondary structure of tRNA genes allow them to translocate more frequently (Moritz and Brown 1987; Staton et al. 1994). It would be expected that if the rate of tRNA gene translocation was much higher than protein-coding and ribosomal gene translocation, that deeper divergences would not have unambiguous support from gene order changes involving tRNAs due to a higher level of homoplasy. Although there is little unambiguous support for Bivalvia in either data set, tRNA gene order data does support clades of Unionidae and Mytilus (Pecten + Crassostrea).

Maximum-parsimony analysis was conducted on both gene order data sets to generate a topology based solely on gene boundaries. Analysis of the gene order data, including tRNAs, provided a total of 67 parsimony informative characters. The MP analysis resulted in 12 most-parsimonious trees (488 steps). The Mollusca was not recovered as monophyletic, and higher-order relationships among the classes were unresolved (not shown). Both Bivalvia and Gastropoda were recovered as monophyletic groups. Within Bivalvia, relationships differed from the inferred topology (Giribet and Wheeler 2002) by the placement of Venerupis in a polytomy with Crassostrea and Mytilus. Bootstrap values were greater than 50% for three clades: Gastropoda (91%), Pupa+Roboastea (76%), and Lampsilis+Inversidens (96%). Analysis of gene order data, excluding tRNAs, resulted in 25 equally parsimonious trees of 159 steps (not shown). The strict consensus indicates less resolution overall and a monophyletic Bivalvia was not recovered.

Variation Within Unionidae

Gene arrangement between female mt genomes of the North American Lampsilis ornata and Asian Inversidens japanensis are identical except for the region between rrnS and cox1. This region includes three protein-coding (nad2, nad3, and cox2) and eight tRNA (A, E, W, R, M, S1, S2, and H) genes (fig. 7). Interestingly, this region is also variable between the M- mitotypes and F-mitotypes of Inversidens (M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication). In all three mt genomes, this variable region contains the largest NC sequence: Lampsilis, 282 bp between trnE and nad2; Inversidens-F, 287 bp between trnW and trnE; and Inversidens-M, 316 bp between trnH and cox1. The association of an NC region with an area of gene translocation has been observed in arthropod taxa (Boore 1999) and may provide a starting point in the identification and characterization of a CR in the Unionidae. Although gene order is more similar between Lampsilis-F and Inversidens-M, phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequence variation among the mitotypes recovers the F-mitotypes of Lampsilis and Inversidens as sister taxa supporting the homology of these two genomes under the criteria described by Hoeh et al. (1996) (J. M. Serb, unpublished data). Homology of the F-mitotypes suggest that there has not been a mitotype reversal in the lineage for Lampsilis and Inversidens, and our limited taxonomic sample agrees with the conclusions of Hoeh et al. (1996) that there is a single origin of DUI in the Unionidae lineage.

Once homology was established for the unionid mt genomes, ancestral character states were reconstructed from the gene order data. When including tRNAs, six unambiguous character states (gene boundaries) support the Unionidae and are putative synapomorphies: trnA-trnS2, trnG-nad6, trnL2-trnN, nad2-trnM, trnQ-nad5, and atp8-nad4L. When excluding tRNAs from the gene order data, three unambiguous character states support the Unionidae: atp6-atp8-nad4L and cob-nad5 (fig. 6).

What Makes Bivalve Gene Order So Variable?

At this time, the available mt gene order data do not support a particular model of gene rearrangement for bivalves, but it does provide tantalizing clues. Multiple copies of genes exist in extant taxa, but the majority of gene duplications are not tandem. This may be because either the duplication did not form in tandem or the gene translocation occurred subsequently to the duplication event. Our data also show an association of large NC regions within a region of gene rearrangement in unionids and between the rrnS duplication in Crassostrea. Sampling mt genome sequences of more closely related bivalves may provide insight to the mechanism of gene movement by limiting the number of gene translocations while at the same time utilizing gene duplication and loss that frequently occurs in Bivalvia. Bivalves provide a unique opportunity to formulate models by providing historical “snapshots” of gene movement, as duplications are predicted to be intermediate steps in mt genome rearrangements. Also, because of their unique mode of mtDNA inheritance, bivalves may have mechanisms for gene translocation not present in other molluscs (see below).

It is important when examining gene rearrangement to consider the likelihood of the change of character states across the topology. Loss and subsequent regain of a gene would appear to be unlikely, whereas gene duplication and loss of one copy would be more probable with our current understanding of gene translocation models. For example, it is unlikely that atp8 was lost in the ancestor of Bivalvia then regained in the Unionidae lineage. Instead, it is possible that the estimation of phylogeny used in our analysis was incorrect or that taxon sampling for gene order was poor. If Venerupis is actually more closely related to Mytilus (Crassostrea + Pecten) than Unionidae, as indicated in the phylogenetic analysis of the gene order data, then the loss of atp8 would not be a putative ancestral state for the Bivalvia but a synapomorphy for a more limited clade, including Venerupis, Mytilus, Crassostrea, and Pecten. When the topology reflects this relationship, two new unambiguously reconstructed ancestral states (trnW-trnR and trnP-cob) are designated for the Bivalvia. Adding taxa may also affect our estimation of character transformation by filling taxonomic gaps in gene order data for class members. However, if the topology of Giribet and Wheeler (2002) is correct, an alternative hypothesis to explain the distribution of atp8 across Bivalvia is multiple and independent losses of atp8 in various lineages. Again, only after a more thorough taxonomic sampling can this hypothesis be addressed.

The occurrence of doubly uniparental inheritance found in some bivalve lineages may also be involved in gene translocation, gene duplication/loss events, and recombination. The data show that gene content and order can vary between M-mitotypes and F-mitotypes of a species (Inversidens japanensis, M. Okazaki andR. Ueshima, personal communication; GenBank accession numbers AB055624 and AB055625), and it has been previously demonstrated that the mechanism that separates the two mitotype lineages may lapse or has multiple origins in Bivalvia. Phylogenetic evidence from Hoeh et al. (1996) and the existence of heteroplasmic females and homoplasmic males (Quesada, Skibinski, and Skibinski 1996; Garrido-Ramos et al. 1998) suggests that the DUI mechanism may occasionally experience breakdowns where a new M-mitotype lineage may be derived from an F-mitotype (mitotype role reversal or “masculinization”). A reversal can also occur in the opposite direction, where an M-mitotype is “feminized” (Garrido-Ramos et al. 1998). Using the example of atp8, if atp8 is deleted from the F-mitotype early in the bivalve evolutionary history, it could be subsequently “gained” in a later lineage (e.g., Unionidae) if that lineage experiences a role-reversal of the mitotypes. In other words, the M-mitotype, which contains a copy of atp8, would replace the F-mitotype that lacked a copy of that gene. This would result in the presence of atp8 in the newly created F-mitotype and in that bivalve lineage. Hoeh et al. (1996) recognizes at least three independent mitotype reversals across Mytilidae and Unionidae. Although controversial, another possible mechanism associated with changes of gene order and genome content is recombination between sexual mitotypes. Ladoukakis and Zouros (2001) found evidence for homologous recombination between a newly masculinized F-mitotype and a maternally inherited F-mitotype and in the gonadal tissue of a male individual of Mytilus galloprovincialis. A second study by Burzynski et al. (2003) provides additional evidence of recombination in M. trossulus at a different location of the mt genome. Further study will be necessary to establish whether mtDNA recombination is a general phenomenon in bivalves or limited to Mytilus, whether recombination is restricted to particular portions of the mt genome, and whether there is a relationship between recombination and DUI. However, if portions of the mt genome can undergo recombination between mitotypes, then this may be another mechanism for gene rearrangement that may not result in tandem gene duplication.

This study represents the first examination of mitochondrial gene rearrangement in bivalves using a phylogenetic framework. One advantage of this method is the ability to infer ancestral character states for mt gene order in Bivalvia. In addition, the ability to map gene order changes on the phylogeny has the potential to elucidate what mechanisms may be responsible for creating the diversity of gene order variation. Several considerations must be made when attempting to reconstruct gene translocation, including the accuracy of the phylogenetic estimation and the probability of the change of character states across the topology. To better understand and model gene rearrangement in the mitochondrial genomes of bivalves, it will be necessary to include the sequences of additional bivalve mt genomes. Increased taxonomic sampling will allow a more accurate estimation of ancestral character states for mt gene order. It also will be paramount to determine how widespread DUI is within the class and the number of times this mode of inheritance has been compromised. Unrecognized mitotype reversals in the evolution of Bivalvia will confound analysis of gene order data if nonhomologous mt genomes are compared.

1

Present address: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Richard Thomas, Associate Editor

Mitochondrial gene order of four bivalve representatives (Crassostrea, Mytilus, Venerupis, and Inversidens). Full citations for these sequences can be found in table 1. Protein and rRNA genes are abbreviated as in the text. tRNA genes are identified by the one-letter code for the corresponding amino acid. The two leucine and two serine tRNA genes are differentiated by their anticodon sequence: L1 = trnL(cua), L2 = trnL(uaa), S1 = trnS(aga), and S2 = trnS(uca). Other tRNA duplications in Crassostrea, Mytilus, and Venerupis are listed by copy number 1 or 2, but this designation does not presume homology across taxa. The direction of transcription is depicted by arrows
Fig. 1.

Mitochondrial gene order of four bivalve representatives (Crassostrea, Mytilus, Venerupis, and Inversidens). Full citations for these sequences can be found in table 1. Protein and rRNA genes are abbreviated as in the text. tRNA genes are identified by the one-letter code for the corresponding amino acid. The two leucine and two serine tRNA genes are differentiated by their anticodon sequence: L1 = trnL(cua), L2 = trnL(uaa), S1 = trnS(aga), and S2 = trnS(uca). Other tRNA duplications in Crassostrea, Mytilus, and Venerupis are listed by copy number 1 or 2, but this designation does not presume homology across taxa. The direction of transcription is depicted by arrows

The potential secondary structure for newly identified tRNAs in Pecten and Crassostrea using tRNAscan-SE. Two and three putative tRNAs are illustrated for Pecten and Crassostrea, respectively (A) and two undetermined tRNAs from Crassostrea (B). Bars between nucleotide pairs indicate base pairing; G-T pairing is shown with dots. Lowercase letters indicate base positions that did not fit tRNAscan models
Fig. 2.

The potential secondary structure for newly identified tRNAs in Pecten and Crassostrea using tRNAscan-SE. Two and three putative tRNAs are illustrated for Pecten and Crassostrea, respectively (A) and two undetermined tRNAs from Crassostrea (B). Bars between nucleotide pairs indicate base pairing; G-T pairing is shown with dots. Lowercase letters indicate base positions that did not fit tRNAscan models

Topology illustrating the traditional relationships among molluscan classes (Salvini-Plawen and Steiner 1996). Gene order data is optimized on this topology. Relationships within gastropods and bivalves were determined by independent data sets from Kurabayashi and Ueshima (2000) and Grande et al. (2002) (gastropods) and Giribet and Wheeler (2002) (bivalves)
Fig. 3.

Topology illustrating the traditional relationships among molluscan classes (Salvini-Plawen and Steiner 1996). Gene order data is optimized on this topology. Relationships within gastropods and bivalves were determined by independent data sets from Kurabayashi and Ueshima (2000) and Grande et al. (2002) (gastropods) and Giribet and Wheeler (2002) (bivalves)

Gene map of the mitochondrial genome of Lampsilis ornata. Protein and rRNA genes are abbreviated as in the text. tRNA genes are identified by the one-letter code for the corresponding amino acid. The two leucine and two serine tRNA genes are differentiated by their anticodon sequence: L1 = trnL(cua), L2 = trnL(uaa), S1 = trnS(aga), and S2 = trnS(uca). The direction of transcription is depicted by arrows. Noncoding regions greater than 20 nucleotides are listed by size, and their genome position and transcriptional orientation are indicated with arrows
Fig. 4.

Gene map of the mitochondrial genome of Lampsilis ornata. Protein and rRNA genes are abbreviated as in the text. tRNA genes are identified by the one-letter code for the corresponding amino acid. The two leucine and two serine tRNA genes are differentiated by their anticodon sequence: L1 = trnL(cua), L2 = trnL(uaa), S1 = trnS(aga), and S2 = trnS(uca). The direction of transcription is depicted by arrows. Noncoding regions greater than 20 nucleotides are listed by size, and their genome position and transcriptional orientation are indicated with arrows

The potential secondary structures for 22 inferred tRNAs of Lampsilis ornata. Amino acid identities are given above each sequence. Bars between nucleotide pairs indicate base pairing; G-T pairing is shown with dots. Lowercase letters indicate base positions that did not fit tRNAscan models; “?” indicates a possible missing base. Features of tRNA secondary structure are illustrated on tRNA (V)
Fig. 5.

The potential secondary structures for 22 inferred tRNAs of Lampsilis ornata. Amino acid identities are given above each sequence. Bars between nucleotide pairs indicate base pairing; G-T pairing is shown with dots. Lowercase letters indicate base positions that did not fit tRNAscan models; “?” indicates a possible missing base. Features of tRNA secondary structure are illustrated on tRNA (V)

Unambiguous character state changes optimized on an independently derived topology for bivalves. Nodes are specified by letters A–C. Bolded genes designate opposite transcriptional orientation. The following are unambiguous character state reconstructions that support a particular node; character state reconstructions at a given node when excluding tRNA genes are listed in ( ). Adjacent genes are separated by a “–.” A: atp8 absent; (atp8 absent, rrnL-cob). B: trnG-trnN; (none). C:trnA-trnS2, trnG-nad6, trnL2-trnN, nad2-trnM, trnQ-nad5, atp8-nad4L; (atp6-atp8-nad4L, cob-nad5). The number of unambiguous autapomorphic character state changes for the bivalve taxa are as follows, where the number in ( ) is from the gene order data set excluding tRNAs: Lampsilis 2 (0); Inversidens 1 (1); Venerupis 11 (8); Crassostrea 2 (0); Pecten 1 (0); Mytilus 4 (2)
Fig. 6.

Unambiguous character state changes optimized on an independently derived topology for bivalves. Nodes are specified by letters A–C. Bolded genes designate opposite transcriptional orientation. The following are unambiguous character state reconstructions that support a particular node; character state reconstructions at a given node when excluding tRNA genes are listed in ( ). Adjacent genes are separated by a “–.” A: atp8 absent; (atp8 absent, rrnL-cob). B: trnG-trnN; (none). C:trnA-trnS2, trnG-nad6, trnL2-trnN, nad2-trnM, trnQ-nad5, atp8-nad4L; (atp6-atp8-nad4L, cob-nad5). The number of unambiguous autapomorphic character state changes for the bivalve taxa are as follows, where the number in ( ) is from the gene order data set excluding tRNAs: Lampsilis 2 (0); Inversidens 1 (1); Venerupis 11 (8); Crassostrea 2 (0); Pecten 1 (0); Mytilus 4 (2)

Gene map of the variable gene order portion in the unionid taxa Lampsilis ornata-F (female mitotype) and Inversidens japanensis-F and Inversidens japanensis-M (male mitotype). Genes transcribed by the opposite strand are underlined. Transfer RNA genes are designated by a single letter for the corresponding amino acid. There are two tRNAs for serine that are differentiated by numerals: S1 and S2 recognize the codons AGN and UCN, respectively. Notation for all other genes is standard and gene size is not to scale
Fig. 7.

Gene map of the variable gene order portion in the unionid taxa Lampsilis ornata-F (female mitotype) and Inversidens japanensis-F and Inversidens japanensis-M (male mitotype). Genes transcribed by the opposite strand are underlined. Transfer RNA genes are designated by a single letter for the corresponding amino acid. There are two tRNAs for serine that are differentiated by numerals: S1 and S2 recognize the codons AGN and UCN, respectively. Notation for all other genes is standard and gene size is not to scale

Table 1

Mitochondrial Genomes of Molluscan Taxa Available on GenBank Used in this Study.

TaxonGenBank Accession NumbersAuthors
Bivalvia
    Mytilus edulisaM83756–M83762Hoffman, Boore, and Brown 1992
    Crassostrea gigasNC_001276S. H. Kim, E. Y. Je, and D. W. Park, personal communication
    Venerupis philippinarum-FbNC_003354M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication
    Inversidens japanensis-FAB055625M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication
    Inversidens japanensis-McAB055624M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima personal communication
    Pecten maximusaX92688D. Sellos, M. Mommerot, and A. Rigaa, personal communication
Gastropoda
    Albinaria coeruleaNC_001761Hatzoglou, Rodakis, and Lecanidou 1995
    Cepaea nemoralisNC_001816Terrett, Miles, and Thomas 1996
    Littorina saxitilisaAJ132137Wilding, Mill, and Grahame 1999
    Pupa strigosaNC_002176Kurabayashi and Ueshima 2000
    Roboastra europaeaAY083457Grande et al. 2002
Polyplacophora
    Katharina tunicataU09810Boore and Brown 1994
Cephalopoda
    Loligo bleekeriNC_002507Tomita et al. 2002
TaxonGenBank Accession NumbersAuthors
Bivalvia
    Mytilus edulisaM83756–M83762Hoffman, Boore, and Brown 1992
    Crassostrea gigasNC_001276S. H. Kim, E. Y. Je, and D. W. Park, personal communication
    Venerupis philippinarum-FbNC_003354M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication
    Inversidens japanensis-FAB055625M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication
    Inversidens japanensis-McAB055624M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima personal communication
    Pecten maximusaX92688D. Sellos, M. Mommerot, and A. Rigaa, personal communication
Gastropoda
    Albinaria coeruleaNC_001761Hatzoglou, Rodakis, and Lecanidou 1995
    Cepaea nemoralisNC_001816Terrett, Miles, and Thomas 1996
    Littorina saxitilisaAJ132137Wilding, Mill, and Grahame 1999
    Pupa strigosaNC_002176Kurabayashi and Ueshima 2000
    Roboastra europaeaAY083457Grande et al. 2002
Polyplacophora
    Katharina tunicataU09810Boore and Brown 1994
Cephalopoda
    Loligo bleekeriNC_002507Tomita et al. 2002

Note.—Bold terms are molluscan classes.

aIncomplete data.

bF = female mitotype.

cM = male mitotype.

Table 1

Mitochondrial Genomes of Molluscan Taxa Available on GenBank Used in this Study.

TaxonGenBank Accession NumbersAuthors
Bivalvia
    Mytilus edulisaM83756–M83762Hoffman, Boore, and Brown 1992
    Crassostrea gigasNC_001276S. H. Kim, E. Y. Je, and D. W. Park, personal communication
    Venerupis philippinarum-FbNC_003354M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication
    Inversidens japanensis-FAB055625M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication
    Inversidens japanensis-McAB055624M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima personal communication
    Pecten maximusaX92688D. Sellos, M. Mommerot, and A. Rigaa, personal communication
Gastropoda
    Albinaria coeruleaNC_001761Hatzoglou, Rodakis, and Lecanidou 1995
    Cepaea nemoralisNC_001816Terrett, Miles, and Thomas 1996
    Littorina saxitilisaAJ132137Wilding, Mill, and Grahame 1999
    Pupa strigosaNC_002176Kurabayashi and Ueshima 2000
    Roboastra europaeaAY083457Grande et al. 2002
Polyplacophora
    Katharina tunicataU09810Boore and Brown 1994
Cephalopoda
    Loligo bleekeriNC_002507Tomita et al. 2002
TaxonGenBank Accession NumbersAuthors
Bivalvia
    Mytilus edulisaM83756–M83762Hoffman, Boore, and Brown 1992
    Crassostrea gigasNC_001276S. H. Kim, E. Y. Je, and D. W. Park, personal communication
    Venerupis philippinarum-FbNC_003354M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication
    Inversidens japanensis-FAB055625M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima, personal communication
    Inversidens japanensis-McAB055624M. Okazaki and R. Ueshima personal communication
    Pecten maximusaX92688D. Sellos, M. Mommerot, and A. Rigaa, personal communication
Gastropoda
    Albinaria coeruleaNC_001761Hatzoglou, Rodakis, and Lecanidou 1995
    Cepaea nemoralisNC_001816Terrett, Miles, and Thomas 1996
    Littorina saxitilisaAJ132137Wilding, Mill, and Grahame 1999
    Pupa strigosaNC_002176Kurabayashi and Ueshima 2000
    Roboastra europaeaAY083457Grande et al. 2002
Polyplacophora
    Katharina tunicataU09810Boore and Brown 1994
Cephalopoda
    Loligo bleekeriNC_002507Tomita et al. 2002

Note.—Bold terms are molluscan classes.

aIncomplete data.

bF = female mitotype.

cM = male mitotype.

Table 2

Primers Used in the Amplification and Sequencing of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Lampsilis ornata.

PrimerPrimer Sequence (5′ to 3′)Base Position Range
ND4-1084RGGAGCTGCCATGTTCATTGATCTTA263–287
aND1-endATAGCACACATTAAAAACCAACACAAAGC278–306
ND4-630FTCGCCAAAGCTCATGTTGAGG705–725
aAsp-endGGTGCTTATTTTTTCTTTTAGGGTTGGTTC1013–1042
aAsp-196FGAAGCAGCGTTAGGGTTGAGTGTATTAG1402–1429
aAsp-150FcGTGAAGTGGGGTTTTGGTAAGAAGTTTAG1668–1696
bAsp-54FGCAGGCTTATGTGTTTGTTTTGTTGG1972–1997
aCO3-350FCTGTCTTTGACTTTTGTGTTGGCTAG2310–2335
aCO3-60FTCATCTTTGGATGCTGGGTTAAGCTA2592–2617
CO3-730RTCAAACTACATCTACAAAATGTCAG2724–2748
CO3-312FGTATGGGTTAGGTTTAACGGTCTTATTGG2963–2991
CO3-176RCACAACCCAACTCCACAGTTGGAACAAG3128–3155
CO3-180FTGGTGGCGAGATGTAATTCGTGAAG3278–3302
CO3-60RGGTCTTTCCTGCGTCATTTCACTCG3528–3552
bCO3-486RGTTAGACAATACAATACCCGTCAATCC3963–3989
HCO2189aTTAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA4312–4338
COI-477FGATTCCGTTGTTTGTATGGGCTGTTACTG4475–4503
J2160-FCTTTACATCTTGCTGGTGCCTCTTCTAT4570–4597
COI-215RCCATATCAGGAGCCCCAATCATAAGAG4766–4792
LCO1490aGGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG4996–5020
J408-RTTGGGCTCTTCCTTCAGTCGGTGT5224–5247
J190-RCCTNACAAGAACTCGCCTATAAACCCCA5268–5295
aHis-580RATTTGTTCTTGTCTTGGTTTCGTCTTTTG5624–5652
J420/190RGCCACTCATGAATAACCCCACCAAA5841–5865
Ala-FGCAATCAACCATTGAGTCCAACTCTAGAAC6460–6489
aAla-540FGTCCTATCTTCCTCAAACTGATTAACAACC7086–7115
Met-RGAAGAGTGATCATTTTGGGTTATGAGCC8023–8052
L1091bTAATAAAAAACTAGGATTAGATACCCTATTAT8603–8636
L1091-RGTAGTCGGGTATCTAATCCGAGTTTTGAGGTTGT8603–8638
12S-100RGATGAGGAAGTAAAGCACCGCCACA8689–8713
12S-360FTTAGCACACCAAGCAAATCTGAACAAGAACT8952–8982
H1478bTAATAATAAGAGCGACGGGCGATGTGT8992–9019
16S-70RCTGTGGTGGGCGTAGAGGTAGTGAC9369–9393
16Sar-L-mytcCGACTGTTTAACAAAAACAT9925–9943
16S-780FCTAAATAATAAAGGAAGACGAAAAGACC10127–10154
16S-78RCGGGGTCTTTTCGTCTTCCTTTATTAT10131–10157
16Sbr-H-mytcCCGTTCTGAACTCAGCTCATGT10432–10452
Pro-10RCTATTTTCTGGGGTGAGTATGTGTAGG10747–10773
unicytbFdTGTGGGGCGACTGTTATTACTAA11253–11275
cytB-150RGCAATAGCAAAAGGAAGGACAAAGTGAAG11373–11401
cytB-390FGTACTAACTCCCACTTGCTTGTTCTTCC11544–11571
unicytbRdAAGAAGTATCATTCGGGTTG11637–11656
Phe-47FGCCATTGCCCTTCTCCATTTTCCCATAC12034–12061
aPhe-334FCAATACCAGAAATCAACCTTCCAGACAC12387–12414
aPhe-768FcTACACTCCTTAGCACCAAACACCCAC12871–12896
bGln-210RcCTACTCTTGTTGAGTGTAGATCACATTGC13942–13970
ND1-350RGGTTGTTGGAAATAAAGGTAGATGGGGTAAGAT14015–14045
Gln-47RGCAAATTGGTTGAAAGCGGAAATATTGG14220–14249
ND1-110RAGGTAGATAGTTTGAAGAGGTTGGTGTTA14707–14735
ND1-240FCTAGCCGTCTACACAACCCTCATAACAG14856–14883
NIJ-12073eTCGGATTCTCCTTCTGCAAAGTC15120–15142
ND1-1750FTACCATAATCTAACCTCAACTCTAAACA15410–15437
aND1-385FACTCTCCCTCAAACTATCAAACAAATC15823–15849
PrimerPrimer Sequence (5′ to 3′)Base Position Range
ND4-1084RGGAGCTGCCATGTTCATTGATCTTA263–287
aND1-endATAGCACACATTAAAAACCAACACAAAGC278–306
ND4-630FTCGCCAAAGCTCATGTTGAGG705–725
aAsp-endGGTGCTTATTTTTTCTTTTAGGGTTGGTTC1013–1042
aAsp-196FGAAGCAGCGTTAGGGTTGAGTGTATTAG1402–1429
aAsp-150FcGTGAAGTGGGGTTTTGGTAAGAAGTTTAG1668–1696
bAsp-54FGCAGGCTTATGTGTTTGTTTTGTTGG1972–1997
aCO3-350FCTGTCTTTGACTTTTGTGTTGGCTAG2310–2335
aCO3-60FTCATCTTTGGATGCTGGGTTAAGCTA2592–2617
CO3-730RTCAAACTACATCTACAAAATGTCAG2724–2748
CO3-312FGTATGGGTTAGGTTTAACGGTCTTATTGG2963–2991
CO3-176RCACAACCCAACTCCACAGTTGGAACAAG3128–3155
CO3-180FTGGTGGCGAGATGTAATTCGTGAAG3278–3302
CO3-60RGGTCTTTCCTGCGTCATTTCACTCG3528–3552
bCO3-486RGTTAGACAATACAATACCCGTCAATCC3963–3989
HCO2189aTTAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA4312–4338
COI-477FGATTCCGTTGTTTGTATGGGCTGTTACTG4475–4503
J2160-FCTTTACATCTTGCTGGTGCCTCTTCTAT4570–4597
COI-215RCCATATCAGGAGCCCCAATCATAAGAG4766–4792
LCO1490aGGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG4996–5020
J408-RTTGGGCTCTTCCTTCAGTCGGTGT5224–5247
J190-RCCTNACAAGAACTCGCCTATAAACCCCA5268–5295
aHis-580RATTTGTTCTTGTCTTGGTTTCGTCTTTTG5624–5652
J420/190RGCCACTCATGAATAACCCCACCAAA5841–5865
Ala-FGCAATCAACCATTGAGTCCAACTCTAGAAC6460–6489
aAla-540FGTCCTATCTTCCTCAAACTGATTAACAACC7086–7115
Met-RGAAGAGTGATCATTTTGGGTTATGAGCC8023–8052
L1091bTAATAAAAAACTAGGATTAGATACCCTATTAT8603–8636
L1091-RGTAGTCGGGTATCTAATCCGAGTTTTGAGGTTGT8603–8638
12S-100RGATGAGGAAGTAAAGCACCGCCACA8689–8713
12S-360FTTAGCACACCAAGCAAATCTGAACAAGAACT8952–8982
H1478bTAATAATAAGAGCGACGGGCGATGTGT8992–9019
16S-70RCTGTGGTGGGCGTAGAGGTAGTGAC9369–9393
16Sar-L-mytcCGACTGTTTAACAAAAACAT9925–9943
16S-780FCTAAATAATAAAGGAAGACGAAAAGACC10127–10154
16S-78RCGGGGTCTTTTCGTCTTCCTTTATTAT10131–10157
16Sbr-H-mytcCCGTTCTGAACTCAGCTCATGT10432–10452
Pro-10RCTATTTTCTGGGGTGAGTATGTGTAGG10747–10773
unicytbFdTGTGGGGCGACTGTTATTACTAA11253–11275
cytB-150RGCAATAGCAAAAGGAAGGACAAAGTGAAG11373–11401
cytB-390FGTACTAACTCCCACTTGCTTGTTCTTCC11544–11571
unicytbRdAAGAAGTATCATTCGGGTTG11637–11656
Phe-47FGCCATTGCCCTTCTCCATTTTCCCATAC12034–12061
aPhe-334FCAATACCAGAAATCAACCTTCCAGACAC12387–12414
aPhe-768FcTACACTCCTTAGCACCAAACACCCAC12871–12896
bGln-210RcCTACTCTTGTTGAGTGTAGATCACATTGC13942–13970
ND1-350RGGTTGTTGGAAATAAAGGTAGATGGGGTAAGAT14015–14045
Gln-47RGCAAATTGGTTGAAAGCGGAAATATTGG14220–14249
ND1-110RAGGTAGATAGTTTGAAGAGGTTGGTGTTA14707–14735
ND1-240FCTAGCCGTCTACACAACCCTCATAACAG14856–14883
NIJ-12073eTCGGATTCTCCTTCTGCAAAGTC15120–15142
ND1-1750FTACCATAATCTAACCTCAACTCTAAACA15410–15437
aND1-385FACTCTCCCTCAAACTATCAAACAAATC15823–15849
Table 2

Primers Used in the Amplification and Sequencing of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Lampsilis ornata.

PrimerPrimer Sequence (5′ to 3′)Base Position Range
ND4-1084RGGAGCTGCCATGTTCATTGATCTTA263–287
aND1-endATAGCACACATTAAAAACCAACACAAAGC278–306
ND4-630FTCGCCAAAGCTCATGTTGAGG705–725
aAsp-endGGTGCTTATTTTTTCTTTTAGGGTTGGTTC1013–1042
aAsp-196FGAAGCAGCGTTAGGGTTGAGTGTATTAG1402–1429
aAsp-150FcGTGAAGTGGGGTTTTGGTAAGAAGTTTAG1668–1696
bAsp-54FGCAGGCTTATGTGTTTGTTTTGTTGG1972–1997
aCO3-350FCTGTCTTTGACTTTTGTGTTGGCTAG2310–2335
aCO3-60FTCATCTTTGGATGCTGGGTTAAGCTA2592–2617
CO3-730RTCAAACTACATCTACAAAATGTCAG2724–2748
CO3-312FGTATGGGTTAGGTTTAACGGTCTTATTGG2963–2991
CO3-176RCACAACCCAACTCCACAGTTGGAACAAG3128–3155
CO3-180FTGGTGGCGAGATGTAATTCGTGAAG3278–3302
CO3-60RGGTCTTTCCTGCGTCATTTCACTCG3528–3552
bCO3-486RGTTAGACAATACAATACCCGTCAATCC3963–3989
HCO2189aTTAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA4312–4338
COI-477FGATTCCGTTGTTTGTATGGGCTGTTACTG4475–4503
J2160-FCTTTACATCTTGCTGGTGCCTCTTCTAT4570–4597
COI-215RCCATATCAGGAGCCCCAATCATAAGAG4766–4792
LCO1490aGGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG4996–5020
J408-RTTGGGCTCTTCCTTCAGTCGGTGT5224–5247
J190-RCCTNACAAGAACTCGCCTATAAACCCCA5268–5295
aHis-580RATTTGTTCTTGTCTTGGTTTCGTCTTTTG5624–5652
J420/190RGCCACTCATGAATAACCCCACCAAA5841–5865
Ala-FGCAATCAACCATTGAGTCCAACTCTAGAAC6460–6489
aAla-540FGTCCTATCTTCCTCAAACTGATTAACAACC7086–7115
Met-RGAAGAGTGATCATTTTGGGTTATGAGCC8023–8052
L1091bTAATAAAAAACTAGGATTAGATACCCTATTAT8603–8636
L1091-RGTAGTCGGGTATCTAATCCGAGTTTTGAGGTTGT8603–8638
12S-100RGATGAGGAAGTAAAGCACCGCCACA8689–8713
12S-360FTTAGCACACCAAGCAAATCTGAACAAGAACT8952–8982
H1478bTAATAATAAGAGCGACGGGCGATGTGT8992–9019
16S-70RCTGTGGTGGGCGTAGAGGTAGTGAC9369–9393
16Sar-L-mytcCGACTGTTTAACAAAAACAT9925–9943
16S-780FCTAAATAATAAAGGAAGACGAAAAGACC10127–10154
16S-78RCGGGGTCTTTTCGTCTTCCTTTATTAT10131–10157
16Sbr-H-mytcCCGTTCTGAACTCAGCTCATGT10432–10452
Pro-10RCTATTTTCTGGGGTGAGTATGTGTAGG10747–10773
unicytbFdTGTGGGGCGACTGTTATTACTAA11253–11275
cytB-150RGCAATAGCAAAAGGAAGGACAAAGTGAAG11373–11401
cytB-390FGTACTAACTCCCACTTGCTTGTTCTTCC11544–11571
unicytbRdAAGAAGTATCATTCGGGTTG11637–11656
Phe-47FGCCATTGCCCTTCTCCATTTTCCCATAC12034–12061
aPhe-334FCAATACCAGAAATCAACCTTCCAGACAC12387–12414
aPhe-768FcTACACTCCTTAGCACCAAACACCCAC12871–12896
bGln-210RcCTACTCTTGTTGAGTGTAGATCACATTGC13942–13970
ND1-350RGGTTGTTGGAAATAAAGGTAGATGGGGTAAGAT14015–14045
Gln-47RGCAAATTGGTTGAAAGCGGAAATATTGG14220–14249
ND1-110RAGGTAGATAGTTTGAAGAGGTTGGTGTTA14707–14735
ND1-240FCTAGCCGTCTACACAACCCTCATAACAG14856–14883
NIJ-12073eTCGGATTCTCCTTCTGCAAAGTC15120–15142
ND1-1750FTACCATAATCTAACCTCAACTCTAAACA15410–15437
aND1-385FACTCTCCCTCAAACTATCAAACAAATC15823–15849
PrimerPrimer Sequence (5′ to 3′)Base Position Range
ND4-1084RGGAGCTGCCATGTTCATTGATCTTA263–287
aND1-endATAGCACACATTAAAAACCAACACAAAGC278–306
ND4-630FTCGCCAAAGCTCATGTTGAGG705–725
aAsp-endGGTGCTTATTTTTTCTTTTAGGGTTGGTTC1013–1042
aAsp-196FGAAGCAGCGTTAGGGTTGAGTGTATTAG1402–1429
aAsp-150FcGTGAAGTGGGGTTTTGGTAAGAAGTTTAG1668–1696
bAsp-54FGCAGGCTTATGTGTTTGTTTTGTTGG1972–1997
aCO3-350FCTGTCTTTGACTTTTGTGTTGGCTAG2310–2335
aCO3-60FTCATCTTTGGATGCTGGGTTAAGCTA2592–2617
CO3-730RTCAAACTACATCTACAAAATGTCAG2724–2748
CO3-312FGTATGGGTTAGGTTTAACGGTCTTATTGG2963–2991
CO3-176RCACAACCCAACTCCACAGTTGGAACAAG3128–3155
CO3-180FTGGTGGCGAGATGTAATTCGTGAAG3278–3302
CO3-60RGGTCTTTCCTGCGTCATTTCACTCG3528–3552
bCO3-486RGTTAGACAATACAATACCCGTCAATCC3963–3989
HCO2189aTTAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA4312–4338
COI-477FGATTCCGTTGTTTGTATGGGCTGTTACTG4475–4503
J2160-FCTTTACATCTTGCTGGTGCCTCTTCTAT4570–4597
COI-215RCCATATCAGGAGCCCCAATCATAAGAG4766–4792
LCO1490aGGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG4996–5020
J408-RTTGGGCTCTTCCTTCAGTCGGTGT5224–5247
J190-RCCTNACAAGAACTCGCCTATAAACCCCA5268–5295
aHis-580RATTTGTTCTTGTCTTGGTTTCGTCTTTTG5624–5652
J420/190RGCCACTCATGAATAACCCCACCAAA5841–5865
Ala-FGCAATCAACCATTGAGTCCAACTCTAGAAC6460–6489
aAla-540FGTCCTATCTTCCTCAAACTGATTAACAACC7086–7115
Met-RGAAGAGTGATCATTTTGGGTTATGAGCC8023–8052
L1091bTAATAAAAAACTAGGATTAGATACCCTATTAT8603–8636
L1091-RGTAGTCGGGTATCTAATCCGAGTTTTGAGGTTGT8603–8638
12S-100RGATGAGGAAGTAAAGCACCGCCACA8689–8713
12S-360FTTAGCACACCAAGCAAATCTGAACAAGAACT8952–8982
H1478bTAATAATAAGAGCGACGGGCGATGTGT8992–9019
16S-70RCTGTGGTGGGCGTAGAGGTAGTGAC9369–9393
16Sar-L-mytcCGACTGTTTAACAAAAACAT9925–9943
16S-780FCTAAATAATAAAGGAAGACGAAAAGACC10127–10154
16S-78RCGGGGTCTTTTCGTCTTCCTTTATTAT10131–10157
16Sbr-H-mytcCCGTTCTGAACTCAGCTCATGT10432–10452
Pro-10RCTATTTTCTGGGGTGAGTATGTGTAGG10747–10773
unicytbFdTGTGGGGCGACTGTTATTACTAA11253–11275
cytB-150RGCAATAGCAAAAGGAAGGACAAAGTGAAG11373–11401
cytB-390FGTACTAACTCCCACTTGCTTGTTCTTCC11544–11571
unicytbRdAAGAAGTATCATTCGGGTTG11637–11656
Phe-47FGCCATTGCCCTTCTCCATTTTCCCATAC12034–12061
aPhe-334FCAATACCAGAAATCAACCTTCCAGACAC12387–12414
aPhe-768FcTACACTCCTTAGCACCAAACACCCAC12871–12896
bGln-210RcCTACTCTTGTTGAGTGTAGATCACATTGC13942–13970
ND1-350RGGTTGTTGGAAATAAAGGTAGATGGGGTAAGAT14015–14045
Gln-47RGCAAATTGGTTGAAAGCGGAAATATTGG14220–14249
ND1-110RAGGTAGATAGTTTGAAGAGGTTGGTGTTA14707–14735
ND1-240FCTAGCCGTCTACACAACCCTCATAACAG14856–14883
NIJ-12073eTCGGATTCTCCTTCTGCAAAGTC15120–15142
ND1-1750FTACCATAATCTAACCTCAACTCTAAACA15410–15437
aND1-385FACTCTCCCTCAAACTATCAAACAAATC15823–15849
Table 3

Pairwise Comparisons of Amino Acid Identitya (Below Diagonal) and Similarityb (Above Diagonal) of the First 30 Amino Acids of atp8 Across Sampled Molluscan Taxa.

InversidensLampsilisKatharinaLittorinaCepaeaAlbinariaRoboastraPupaLoligo
Inversidens1013261330162620
Lampsilis5616201630202026
Katharina3036262323161316
Littorina2643501623161626
Cepaea1636202016201613
Albinaria2326262633132613
Roboastra4036232330362323
Pupa3336263030302616
Loligo3033505020332330
InversidensLampsilisKatharinaLittorinaCepaeaAlbinariaRoboastraPupaLoligo
Inversidens1013261330162620
Lampsilis5616201630202026
Katharina3036262323161316
Littorina2643501623161626
Cepaea1636202016201613
Albinaria2326262633132613
Roboastra4036232330362323
Pupa3336263030302616
Loligo3033505020332330

aPercentage of identical amino acid positions.

bPercentage of amino acid positions that belong to the same chemical group.

Table 3

Pairwise Comparisons of Amino Acid Identitya (Below Diagonal) and Similarityb (Above Diagonal) of the First 30 Amino Acids of atp8 Across Sampled Molluscan Taxa.

InversidensLampsilisKatharinaLittorinaCepaeaAlbinariaRoboastraPupaLoligo
Inversidens1013261330162620
Lampsilis5616201630202026
Katharina3036262323161316
Littorina2643501623161626
Cepaea1636202016201613
Albinaria2326262633132613
Roboastra4036232330362323
Pupa3336263030302616
Loligo3033505020332330
InversidensLampsilisKatharinaLittorinaCepaeaAlbinariaRoboastraPupaLoligo
Inversidens1013261330162620
Lampsilis5616201630202026
Katharina3036262323161316
Littorina2643501623161626
Cepaea1636202016201613
Albinaria2326262633132613
Roboastra4036232330362323
Pupa3336263030302616
Loligo3033505020332330

aPercentage of identical amino acid positions.

bPercentage of amino acid positions that belong to the same chemical group.

Table 4

Codon Usage in 13 Mitochondrial Protein-Coding Genes of Lampsilis ornata.

AACodonN%
Phe (F)TTT2677.18
TTC370.10
Leu (L1)TTA1885.06
TTG1834.92
Ser (S2)TCT1102.96
TCC260.70
TCA511.37
TCG130.35
Tyr (Y)TAT942.53
TAC330.89
TERMTAA40.11
TAG80.22
Cys (C)TGT521.40
TGC60.16
Trp (W)TGA461.24
TGG671.80
Leu (L2)CTT812.18
CTC260.70
CTA832.23
CTG150.40
Pro (P)CCT601.61
CCC220.59
CCA451.21
CCG160.43
His (H)CAT581.56
CAC190.51
Gln (Q)CAA350.94
CAG260.70
Arg (R)CGT100.27
CGC40.11
CGA320.86
CGG130.35
Ile (I)ATT1885.06
ATC551.48
Met (M)ATA1032.77
ATG701.88
Thr (T)ACT772.07
ACC401.08
ACA431.16
ACG130.35
Asn (N)AAT581.56
AAC320.86
Lys (K)AAA491.32
AAG401.08
Ser (S1)AGT551.48
AGC160.43
AGA350.94
AGG491.32
Val (V)GTT1905.11
GTC220.59
GTA681.83
GTG952.56
Ala (A)GCT992.66
GCC391.05
GCA401.08
GCG200.54
Asp (D)GAT521.40
GAC140.38
Glu (E)GAA290.78
GAG571.53
Gly (G)GGT1273.42
GGC260.70
GGA601.61
GGG1263.39
AACodonN%
Phe (F)TTT2677.18
TTC370.10
Leu (L1)TTA1885.06
TTG1834.92
Ser (S2)TCT1102.96
TCC260.70
TCA511.37
TCG130.35
Tyr (Y)TAT942.53
TAC330.89
TERMTAA40.11
TAG80.22
Cys (C)TGT521.40
TGC60.16
Trp (W)TGA461.24
TGG671.80
Leu (L2)CTT812.18
CTC260.70
CTA832.23
CTG150.40
Pro (P)CCT601.61
CCC220.59
CCA451.21
CCG160.43
His (H)CAT581.56
CAC190.51
Gln (Q)CAA350.94
CAG260.70
Arg (R)CGT100.27
CGC40.11
CGA320.86
CGG130.35
Ile (I)ATT1885.06
ATC551.48
Met (M)ATA1032.77
ATG701.88
Thr (T)ACT772.07
ACC401.08
ACA431.16
ACG130.35
Asn (N)AAT581.56
AAC320.86
Lys (K)AAA491.32
AAG401.08
Ser (S1)AGT551.48
AGC160.43
AGA350.94
AGG491.32
Val (V)GTT1905.11
GTC220.59
GTA681.83
GTG952.56
Ala (A)GCT992.66
GCC391.05
GCA401.08
GCG200.54
Asp (D)GAT521.40
GAC140.38
Glu (E)GAA290.78
GAG571.53
Gly (G)GGT1273.42
GGC260.70
GGA601.61
GGG1263.39

Note.—AA = amino acid; N = total number of particular codon in all proteins; % = percentage of total codon usage; TERM = termination codons. The total number of codons is 3,717. Abbreviated stop codons were excluded.

Table 4

Codon Usage in 13 Mitochondrial Protein-Coding Genes of Lampsilis ornata.

AACodonN%
Phe (F)TTT2677.18
TTC370.10
Leu (L1)TTA1885.06
TTG1834.92
Ser (S2)TCT1102.96
TCC260.70
TCA511.37
TCG130.35
Tyr (Y)TAT942.53
TAC330.89
TERMTAA40.11
TAG80.22
Cys (C)TGT521.40
TGC60.16
Trp (W)TGA461.24
TGG671.80
Leu (L2)CTT812.18
CTC260.70
CTA832.23
CTG150.40
Pro (P)CCT601.61
CCC220.59
CCA451.21
CCG160.43
His (H)CAT581.56
CAC190.51
Gln (Q)CAA350.94
CAG260.70
Arg (R)CGT100.27
CGC40.11
CGA320.86
CGG130.35
Ile (I)ATT1885.06
ATC551.48
Met (M)ATA1032.77
ATG701.88
Thr (T)ACT772.07
ACC401.08
ACA431.16
ACG130.35
Asn (N)AAT581.56
AAC320.86
Lys (K)AAA491.32
AAG401.08
Ser (S1)AGT551.48
AGC160.43
AGA350.94
AGG491.32
Val (V)GTT1905.11
GTC220.59
GTA681.83
GTG952.56
Ala (A)GCT992.66
GCC391.05
GCA401.08
GCG200.54
Asp (D)GAT521.40
GAC140.38
Glu (E)GAA290.78
GAG571.53
Gly (G)GGT1273.42
GGC260.70
GGA601.61
GGG1263.39
AACodonN%
Phe (F)TTT2677.18
TTC370.10
Leu (L1)TTA1885.06
TTG1834.92
Ser (S2)TCT1102.96
TCC260.70
TCA511.37
TCG130.35
Tyr (Y)TAT942.53
TAC330.89
TERMTAA40.11
TAG80.22
Cys (C)TGT521.40
TGC60.16
Trp (W)TGA461.24
TGG671.80
Leu (L2)CTT812.18
CTC260.70
CTA832.23
CTG150.40
Pro (P)CCT601.61
CCC220.59
CCA451.21
CCG160.43
His (H)CAT581.56
CAC190.51
Gln (Q)CAA350.94
CAG260.70
Arg (R)CGT100.27
CGC40.11
CGA320.86
CGG130.35
Ile (I)ATT1885.06
ATC551.48
Met (M)ATA1032.77
ATG701.88
Thr (T)ACT772.07
ACC401.08
ACA431.16
ACG130.35
Asn (N)AAT581.56
AAC320.86
Lys (K)AAA491.32
AAG401.08
Ser (S1)AGT551.48
AGC160.43
AGA350.94
AGG491.32
Val (V)GTT1905.11
GTC220.59
GTA681.83
GTG952.56
Ala (A)GCT992.66
GCC391.05
GCA401.08
GCG200.54
Asp (D)GAT521.40
GAC140.38
Glu (E)GAA290.78
GAG571.53
Gly (G)GGT1273.42
GGC260.70
GGA601.61
GGG1263.39

Note.—AA = amino acid; N = total number of particular codon in all proteins; % = percentage of total codon usage; TERM = termination codons. The total number of codons is 3,717. Abbreviated stop codons were excluded.

The authors would like to thank David Oppenheimer for providing guidance, bench space, and use of equipment; Mary Pollock and Sujatha Krishnakumar for providing discussion and assistance in the lab; the UA labs of Guy and Kim Caldwell, Margaret Johnson, and Janis O'Donnell for use of equipment; and Bonnie Bowen who generously provided sequence for cob primers. We thank Rafael Zardoya for protocol discussion; Rafael Zardoya and Gonzalo Giribet for providing their pre-published manuscripts; Kevin Helfenbein for helpful suggestions for identification of tRNAs; and Kevin Roe for support, insightful comments, and encouragement during the project. We also thank anonymous reviewers who provided suggestions and constructive comments to the manuscript. Financial support was provided by the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and the National Science Foundation (multiuser equipment grant # DBI-0070351 to C.L.). This research is in partial fulfillment of the Ph.D. program in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Alabama for J.M.S.

Literature Cited

Avise, J. C.

2000
. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Beagley, C. T., R. Okimoto, and D. R. Wolstenholme.

1998
. The mitochondrial genome of the sea anemone Metridium senile (Cnidaria): introns, a paucity of tRNA genes, and a near-standard genetic code.
Genetics
148
:
1091
-1108.

Black, W. C. IV, and R. L. Roehrdanz.

1998
. Mitochondrial gene order is not conserved in arthropods: prostriate and metastriate tick mitochondrial genomes.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
15
:
1772
-1785.

Boore, J. L.

1999
. Animal mitochondrial genomes.
Nucleic Acids Res.
27
:
1767
-1780.

2000
. The duplication/random loss model for gene rearrangement exemplified by mitochondrial genomes of deuterostome animals. Pp. 133–147 in D. Sankoff andJ. Nadeau, eds. Computational biology series. Vol. 1. Comparative genomics. Kluwer Publishers, Netherlands.

Boore, J. L., and W. M. Brown.

1994
. Complete DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the black chiton, Katharina tunicata.
Genetics
138
:
423
-443.

1995
. Complete DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the annelid worm, Lumbricus terrestris.
Genetics
141
:
305
-319.

2000
. Mitochondrial genomes of Galathealinum, Helobdella, and Platynereis: sequence and gene arrangement comparisons indicate that Pogonophora is not a phylum and Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
17
:
87
-106.

Boore, J. L., T. M. Collins, D. Stanton, L. L. Daehler, and W. M. Brown.

1995
. Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements.
Nature
376
:
163
-165.

Boore, J. L., D. V. Lavrov, and W. M. Brown.

1998
. Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans.
Nature
392
:
667
-668.

Boore, J. L., and J. L. Staton.

2002
. The mitochondrial genome of the sipunculid Phascolopsis gouldii supports its association with Annelida rather than Mollusca.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
19
:
127
-137.

Burzynski, A., M. Zbawicka, D. O. F. Skibinski, and R. Wenne.

2003
. Evidence for recombination of mtDNA in the marine mussel Mytilus trossulus from the Baltic.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
20
:
388
-392.

Folmer, O., W. R. Hoeh, M. B. Black, and R. L. Vrijenhoek.

1994
. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from metazoan invertebrates.
Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotech.
3
:
294
-299.

Garey, J. R., and D. R. Wolstenholme.

1989
. Plathyhelminth mitochondrial DNA: evidence for early evolutionary origin of a tRNA ser AGN that contains a dihydrouridine arm replacement loop and of serine-specifying AGA and AGG codons.
J. Mol. Evol.
28
:
374
-387.

Garrido-Ramos, M. A., D. T. Stewart, B. W. Sutherland, and E. Zouros.

1998
. The distribution of male-transmitted and female-transmitted mitochondrial DNA types in somatic tissues of blue mussels: implications for the operation of doubly uniparental inheritance.
Genome
41
:
818
-824.

Giribet, G., and W. Wheeler.

2002
. On bivalve phylogeny: a high-level phylogeny of the mollusc class Bivalvia based on a combined analysis of morphology and DNA sequence data.
Invert. Zool.
121
:
271
-324.

Grande, C., J. Templado, J. L. Cervera, and R. Zardoya.

2002
. The complete mitochondrial genome of the nudibranch Roboasta europaea (Mollusca: Gastropoda) supports the monophyly of opisthobranchs.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
19
:
1672
-1685.

Hatzoglou, E., G. C. Rodakis, and R. Lecanidou.

1995
. Complete sequence and gene organization of the mitochondrial genome of the land snail Albinaria coerula.
Genetics
140
:
1353
-1366.

Helfenbein, K. G., W. M. Brown, and J. L. Boore.

2001
. The complete mitochondrial genome of the articulate brachiopod Terebratalia transversa.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
18
:
1734
-1744.

Hoeh, W. R., D. T. Stewart, B. W. Sutherland, and E. Zouros.

1996
. Multiple origins of gender-associated mitochondrial DNA lineages in bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia).
Evolution
50
:
2276
-2286.

Hoffman, R. J., J. L. Boore, and W. M. Brown.

1992
. A novel mitochondrial genome organization for the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis.
Genetics
131
:
397
-412.

Kumazawa, Y., H. Ota, M. Nishida, and T. Ozawa.

1998
. The complete nucleotide sequence of a snake (Dinodon semicarinatus) mitochondrial genome with two identical control regions.
Genetics
150
:
313
-329.

Kurabayashi, A., and R. Ueshima.

2000
. Complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the primative opistobranch Pupa strigosa: systematic implications of the genome organization.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
17
:
266
-277.

Ladoukakis, E. D., and E. Zouros.

2001
. Direct evidence for homologous recombination in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) mitochondrial DNA.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
18
:
1168
-1175.

Lavrov, D. V., J. L. Boore, and W. M. Brown.

2000
. The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
17
:
813
-824.

2002
. Complete mtDNA sequences of two millipedes suggest a new model for mitochondrial gene rearrangements: duplication and nonrandom loss.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
12
:
163
-169.

Lewis, D. L., C. L. Farr, and L. S. Kaguni.

1995
. Drosophila melanogaster mitochondrial DNA: completion of the nucleotide sequence and evolutionary comparisons.
Insect Mol. Biol.
4
:
263
-278.

Liu, H.-P., J. B. Mitton, and S.-K. Wu.

1996
. Paternal mitochondrial DNA differentiation far exceeds maternal mitochondrial DNA and allozyme differentiation in the freshwater mussels, Anodonta grandis grandis.
Evolution
50
:
952
-957.

Lowe, T. M., and S. R. Eddy.

1997
. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25
:
955
-964.

Lydeard, C., W. E. Holznagel, M. Glaubrecht, and W. F. Ponder.

2002
. Molecular phylogeny of a circum-global, diverse gastropod superfamily (Cerithiodea: Mollusca: Caenogastropoda): pushing the deepest phylogenetic limits of mitochondrial LSU rDNA sequences.
Mol. Phyl. Evol.
22
:
399
-406.

Lydeard, C., M. Mulvey, and G. M. Davis.

1996
. Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits of North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
351
:
1593
-1603.

Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison.

2000
. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

Moritz, C., and W. M. Brown.

1987
. Tandem duplications in animal mitochondrial DNAs: variation in incidence and gene content among lizards.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84
:
7183
-7187.

Morrison, C. L., A. W. Harvey, S. Lavery, K. Tieu, Y. Huang, and C. W. Cunningham.

2001
. Mitochondrial gene rearrangements confirm the parallel evolution of the crab-like form.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
269
:
345
-350.

Ojala, D., J. Montoya, and G. Attardi.

1981
. tRNA punctuation model of RNA processing in human mitochondria.
Nature
290
:
470
-474.

Okimoto, R., H. M. Chamberlin, J. L. Macfarlane, and D. R. Wolstenholme.

1991
. Repeated sequence sets in mitochondrial DNA molecules of root knot nematodes (Meloidogyne): nucleotide sequences, genome location and potential for host race identification.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19
:
1619
-1626.

Passamonti, M., and V. Scali.

2001
. Gender-associated mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in the venerid clam Tapes philippinarum (Mollusca Bivalvia).
Curr. Genet.
39
:
117
-124.

Quesada, H., D. A. G. Skibinski, and D. O. F. Skibinski.

1996
. Sex-biased heteroplasmy and mitochondrial DNA inheritance in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk.
Curr. Genet.
29
:
423
-426.

Rawlings, T. A., T. M. Collins, and R. Bieler.

2001
. A major mitochondrial gene rearrangement among closely related species.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
18
:
1604
-1609.

Roe, K. J., and C. Lydeard.

1998
. Molecular systematics of the freshwater mussel genus Potamilus (Bivalvia: Unionidae).
Malacologia
39
:
195
-205.

Salvini-Plawen, L., and G. Steiner.

1996
. Synapomorphies and pleisomorphies in higher classification of Mollusca. Pp. 29–51 in J. Taylor, ed. Origin and evolutionary radiation of the Mollusca. The Malacological Society of London, London.

Serb, J. M., J. E. Buhay, and C. Lydeard.

2003
. Molecular systematics of the North American freshwater bivalve genus Quadrula (Unionidae: Ambleminae) based on mitochondrial ND1 sequences.
Mol. Phyl. Evol.
28
:
1
-11.

Shao, R., J. H. Campbell, and S. C. Barker.

2001
. Numerous gene rearrangements in the mitochondrial genome of the wallaby louse, Heterodoxous macropus (Phthiraptera).
Mol. Biol. Evol.
18
:
858
-865.

Skelton, P. W., and M. J. Benton.

1993
. Mollusca: Rostroconchia, Scaphapoda and Bivalvia. Pp. 237–262 in M. J. Benton, ed. The fossil record 2. Chapman and Hall, London.

Skibinski, D. O. F., C. Gallagher, and C. M. Beynon.

1994
. Sex-limited mitochondrial DNA transmission in the marine mussel Mytilus edulis.
Genetics
138
:
801
-809.

Staton, J. L., L. L. Daehler, and W. M. Brown.

1997
. Mitochondrial gene arrangement of the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus L.: conservation of major features among arthropod classes.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
14
:
867
-874.

Staton, J. L., L. L. Daehler, C. C. Moritz, and W. M. Brown.

1994
. Sequences with the potential to form stem-and-loop structures are associated with coding-region duplications in animal mitochondrial DNA.
Genetics
137
:
233
-241.

Swofford, D. L.

2002
. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

Terrett, J. A., S. Miles, and R. H. Thomas.

1996
. Complete DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Cepaea nemoralis (Gastropoda: Pulmonata).
J. Mol. Evol.
42
:
160
-168.

Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson.

1994
. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22
:
4673
-4680.

Tomita, K., S. Yokobori, T. Oshima, T. Ueda, and K. Watanabe.

2002
. The cephalopod Loligo bleekeri mitochondrial genome: multiplied noncoding regions and transposition of tRNA genes.
J. Mol. Evol.
54
:
486
-500.

White, L. R., B. A. Mcpheron, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr.

1996
. Molecular genetic identification tools for the unionids of French Creek,.
Pennsylvania. Malacologia
38
:
181
-202.

Wilding, C. S., P. J. Mill, and J. Grahame.

1999
. Partial sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Littorina saxatilis: relevance to gastropod phylogenetics.
J. Mol. Evol.
48
:
348
-359.

Yamazaki, N., R. Ueshima, and J. A. Terrett, et al. (12 co-authors).

1997
. Evolution of pulmonate gastropod mitochondrial genomes: comparisons of gene organizations of Euhadra, Cepea and Albinaria and implications of unusual tRNA secondary structures.
Genetics
145
:
749
-758.

Zardoya, R., A. Garrido-Pertierra, and J. M. Bautista.

1995
. The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial DNA genome of the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss.
J. Mol. Evol.
41
:
942
-951.

Zouros, E., A. O. Ball, C. Saavedra, and K. R. Freeman.

1994
. An unusual type of mitochondrial DNA inheritance in the blue mussel Mytilus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91
:
7463
-7467.