1-20 of 39012
Sort by
Journal Article
Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 42, Issue 4, April 2025, msaf087, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf087
Published: 28 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Sivakumar Prasanth Kumar and others
Molecular Biology and Evolution, msaf096, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf096
Published: 25 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Miguel Vasconcelos Almeida and others
Molecular Biology and Evolution, msaf097, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf097
Published: 25 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Giulia Zancolli and others
Molecular Biology and Evolution, msaf095, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf095
Published: 25 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Nélida Padilla-García and others
Molecular Biology and Evolution, msaf093, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf093
Published: 24 April 2025
Image
Published: 21 April 2025
Fig. 2. Performance measures for the first simulation study vs the probability threshold used to identify transmission links. Top: Sensitivity, middle: specificity, bottom: precision. On the left, we show nondirectional transmission links, and on the right, we show directional transmission links. The red cu
Image
Published: 21 April 2025
Fig. 4. Performance measures for the second simulation study vs the probability threshold used to identify transmission links. Top: Sensitivity, middle: specificity, bottom: precision. On the left, we show nondirectional transmission links, and on the right we show directional transmission links. The red cu
Image
Published: 21 April 2025
Fig. 5. Benchmarking results for the parameters R of deme 1 a), R of deme 2 b), π of deme 1 c), π of deme 2 d), ρ of deme 1 e), ρ of deme 2 f), κ g), and λ h). Each x axis represents the true value used in the simulation, and each y axis represents inferred values. Posterior mean values
Image
Published: 21 April 2025
Fig. 1. Combined transmission and phylogenetic tree for the first simulation study. The tips of the tree are samples taken from infected hosts. The tree topology provides the dated phylogenetic tree, including the date of the most recent common ancestor for any set of samples. The transmission tree is added
Image
Published: 21 April 2025
Fig. 3. Combined transmission and phylogenetic tree for the second simulation study. The tips of the tree are samples taken from infected hosts. The tree topology provides the dated phylogenetic tree, i.e. providing the date of the most recent common ancestor for any set of samples. The transmission tree is
Image
Published: 21 April 2025
Fig. 6. Parameter estimates in the tuberculosis analysis: the reproduction number R a), sampling fraction π b), and probability to remain in a deme ρ c) are shown for both the HIV negative (left) and HIV positive (right) demes.
Image
Published: 21 April 2025
Fig. 8. Parameter estimates in the H7N7 analysis: the reproduction number R a), sampling proportion π b), and probability to remain in a deme ρ c) are shown for each of the four locations.
Journal Article
Jake Carson and others
Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 42, Issue 4, April 2025, msaf083, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf083
Published: 21 April 2025
Image
Published: 21 April 2025
Fig. 7. Posterior transmission probabilities in the tuberculosis analysis. The x axis indicates the infector, and the y axis indicates the infected. The shading in each cell indicates the posterior probability that the infector transmitted directly to the infected. We have left gaps to separate individu
Image
Published: 21 April 2025
Fig. 9. Posterior transmission probabilities in the H7N7 analysis. The x axis indicates the infector and the y axis indicates the infected. The shading in each cell indicates the posterior probability that the infector transmitted directly to the infected. We have left gaps to separate hosts at the four
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Evan S Forsythe and others
Molecular Biology and Evolution, msaf089, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf089
Published: 18 April 2025
Image
Published: 18 April 2025
Fig. 4. Comparison of differentiation and divergence ( F ST and d XY ) across genomic regions between neighboring populations. Violin plots display average values in 50 kb windows for centromeres (blue), inversions (yellow), telomeres (red), and the rest of the genome (dark gray) for a) F ST and b)
Image
Published: 18 April 2025
Fig. 5. Comparison of diversity across genomic regions within the four populations. a) Violin plots display average π values in 50 kb windows for centromeres (blue), inversions (yellow), telomeres (red), and the rest of the genome (dark gray). b) Average π in each of the four major inversions. c) Heatma
Image
Published: 18 April 2025
Fig. 2. Genome-wide distribution of F ST , averaged in 50 kb windows, across the 24 chromosomes of the Atlantic silverside genome, for pairwise comparisons of neighboring populations as indicated in fig. 1b . Comparison between a) Nova Scotia (NS) and Quebec (QU), where gene flow is limited, b) between N
Image
Published: 18 April 2025
Fig. 3. Inversions and putative centromeres coincide with patterns of genomic differentiation and recombination suppression between populations. Black points show F ST in 50 kb windows between the GA and NY populations (left y -axis), and gray points show the recombination rate in their interpopulation