Abstract

It has recently been proposed that nomifensine (Nom) administration discriminates those patients with PRLsecreting pituitary tumors from those who have hyperprolactinemia due to other causes. In the present study, this test was performed on 12 presumed functional hyperprolactinemic subjects, 9 patients with surgically proved PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma (6 microadenoma and 3 macroadenoma), and 7 patients with surgically proved non-PRL-secreting hypothalamic tumors (3 craniopharyngioma, 3 suprasellar germinoma, and 1 suprasellar ependymoma). The Nom test suppressed the plasma PRL level to below 60% of the basal level in all 12 women with presumed functional hyperprolactinemia, but did not alter plasma PRL levels in the patients with PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma or hypothalamic tumor. This evidence confirms that the test is, at least in part, able to discriminate those individuals with PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma from those without, regardless of the size of the tumor. However, the test is not capable of distinguishing between hyperprolactinemia due to PRL-secreting pituitary tumors and that due to non-PRL-secreting hypothalamic tumors. A lack of response to Nom is not necessarily due to the presence of a PRL-secreting tumor, and may be related to dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary system.

This content is only available as a PDF.
You do not currently have access to this article.