Abstract

Context

Mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) affects up to 50% of patients with adrenal adenomas. Frailty is a syndrome characterized by the loss of physiological reserves and an increase in vulnerability, and it serves as a marker of declining health.

Objective

To compare frailty in patients with MACS versus patients with nonfunctioning adrenal tumors (NFAT).

Design

Retrospective study, 2003-2018

Setting

Referral center

Patients

Patients >20 years of age with adrenal adenoma and MACS (1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression (DST) of 1.9-5 µg/dL) and NFAT (DST <1.9 µg/dL).

Main outcome measure

Frailty index (range 0-1), calculated using a 47-variable deficit model.

Results

Patients with MACS (n = 168) demonstrated a higher age-, sex-, and body mass index–adjusted prevalence of hypertension (71% vs 60%), cardiac arrhythmias (50% vs 40%), and chronic kidney disease (25% vs 17%), but a lower prevalence of asthma (5% vs 14%) than patients with NFAT (n = 275). Patients with MACS reported more symptoms of weakness (21% vs 11%), falls (7% vs 2%), and sleep difficulty (26% vs 15%) as compared with NFAT. Age-, sex- and BMI-adjusted frailty index was higher in patients with MACS vs patients with NFAT (0.17 vs 0.15; P = 0.009). Using a frailty index cutoff of 0.25, 24% of patients with MACS were frail, versus 18% of patients with NFAT (P = 0.028).

Conclusion

Patients with MACS exhibit a greater burden of comorbid conditions, adverse symptoms, and frailty than patients with NFAT. Future prospective studies are needed to further characterize frailty, examine its responsiveness to adrenalectomy, and assess its influence on health outcomes in patients with MACS.

Adrenal tumors are discovered incidentally in 7% of adults undergoing cross-sectional abdominal imaging and a majority of these tumors represent benign adrenal cortical adenomas (1). Adrenal cortical adenomas can be functioning, with either overt or mild adrenal hormone excess, or nonfunctioning, without any detectable hormone excess (2). Mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) is evident in functioning adrenal adenomas and is reported in approximately 50% of patients with adrenal cortical adenomas (1). The 2016 guidelines on management of adrenal incidentaloma published by the European Endocrine Society and the European Network for Study of Adrenal Tumors recommend that cortisol should be measured after an overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in any patient with an adrenal mass, and interpreted as a “possible autonomous cortisol secretion” when concentrations are 1.9 to 5.0 μg/dL and “confirmed autonomous cortisol secretion” when >5.0 μg/dL (2).

Patients with MACS demonstrate increased rates of cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus), cardiovascular events, and mortality (3, 4). In addition, patients with MACS have higher prevalence of osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fractures (5, 6). Adrenalectomy results in reversal or improvement of several cardiovascular risk factors in some, but not all, patients with MACS (7). In contrast, patients managed conservatively demonstrate progression of cardiovascular comorbidities (3). Nevertheless, recommendation for adrenalectomy is reserved for patients with a more severe degree of MACS (DST >5 µg/dL) and when comorbidities are already present (2). As such, the majority of patients with MACS are followed conservatively, and identifying a patient most likely to benefit from adrenalectomy remains challenging.

Frailty is a geriatric syndrome characterized by physiological decline and an increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, including surgical complications, falls, institutionalization, disability, and death (8). The frailty deficit index has been developed as a measure of this syndrome (9) and been shown to correlate and predict risk for death in a community-dwelling population (2), patients with multiple comorbidities, and patients undergoing surgery (10-12). Frailty index can be also applied to nonelderly patients, and it has been previously shown to predict adverse health outcomes in patients with lupus and younger critically ill patients (13, 14). The frailty index is constructed based on deficits available in the electronic medical record and, thus, can be applied in retrospective studies.

In this study, our objectives were to 1) develop a frailty index applicable to patients with adrenal cortical adenomas utilizing the deficit accumulation model as a unique measure of health status; and 2) determine the prevalence of frailty in patients with MACS and patients with nonfunctioning adrenal tumors (NFAT; DST < 1.9 µg/dL). We hypothesized that patients with MACS are more frail than patients with NFAT.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of consecutive adult patients with adrenal adenomas evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, between December 8, 2003 and December 31, 2018. The study protocol was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Inclusion criteria were: 1) patients ≥20 years of age with incidentally discovered adrenal cortical adenoma and 1 mg DST <5 µg/dL; and 2) follow-up of at least 1 year. Exclusion criteria were 1) exogenous glucocorticoid use; 2) another adrenal disorder, including overt adrenal hormone excess, another concomitant adrenal mass other than adenoma, adrenal insufficiency, or congenital adrenal hyperplasia; and 3) patients with absent current visit information (CVI), a form completed by patients prior to any appointment, with questions of interest within ±1 year from index. Medical records were reviewed for comorbidities and to confirm the diagnosis of adrenal mass and results of DST. CVI was used to extract symptoms and assess activities of daily living (ADL). MACS was defined as cortisol of 1.9 to 5.0 μg/dL after 1 mg DST and no overt features of cortisol excess (2).

We identified 47 variables to construct a frailty index using a deficit accumulation model (Table 1), based on a previously described method (9). In brief, frailty index variables include symptoms, signs, disabilities, ADL, self-rated health, and comorbidities selected based on the following criteria: 1) deficits must be associated with health status; 2) the prevalence of the deficit must generally increase with age, although some clearly age-related adverse conditions can decrease in prevalence at very advanced ages due to survivor effect; 3) deficits must not saturate too early (for example presbyopia is almost universal and saturates at 55 years of age); 4) deficits must cover a range of organ systems; 5) if a single frailty index is to be used longitudinally on the same cohort of patients, the items that make up the frailty index need to be the same; and 6) frailty index must include at least 30 to 40 variables. In our construct of frailty index, we have selected 14 ADLs and 13 symptoms from CVI (out of a total of 66) that fulfilled the above criteria (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2) (15). CVI completed within ± 1 year from the time of DST (index date) was used for each patient. Symptoms that were not relevant or represented acute symptoms were excluded. In addition to ADL and symptoms in CVI, frailty included the following chronic comorbidities: hypertension, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, stroke, arthritis, asthma, cancer, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, depression, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, anxiety, and fractures, all defined based on at least 1 diagnosis code within 5 years prior and up to 6 months after the index date. Diagnosis was based on the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision code and the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) definitions of chronic conditions (16). We used 20 chronic comorbidities defined by DHHS to study multimorbidity. However, we excluded HIV infections, autism spectrum disorders, hepatitis, and schizophrenia because of rarity in our population (16, 17). We added anxiety, fracture at osteoporotic site, and atrial fibrillation as these are associated with aging population and common in our population (18-20) All variables in the frailty index were given 1 point when present and 0 points when not present, with the exception of BMI (underweight [<18.5 kg/m2] or obese [≥30 kg/m2] = 1; overweight [25 to <30 kg/m2] = 0.5; normal [18.5 to <25 kg/m2] = 0), and the ADL, climbing 2 flights of stairs without rest (no, can’t do at all = 1; yes, with difficulty = 0.5; yes, with no difficulty = 0), Table 1. The frailty index was calculated as the cumulative points divided by 47 and reported as frailty index with a range of 0 to 1. Frailty was defined based on frailty index: non-frail (frailty index <0.11), prefrail (frailty index of 0.11-0.25), and frail (frailty index ≥0.25) (10, 21-23).

Table 1.

Variables Used to Calculate the Frailty Indexa

Variables used in frailty indexPoints assigned
Comorbidities
Body mass index, kg/m2<18.5 or ≥30 = 1
25 to <30 = 0.5
18.5 to <25 = 0
HypertensionYes = 1, No = 0
DiabetesYes = 1, No = 0
HyperlipidemiaYes = 1, No = 0
Chronic kidney diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
Coronary artery diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
Cardiac arrhythmiaYes = 1, No = 0
Atrial fibrillationYes = 1, No = 0
Congestive heart failureYes = 1, No = 0
StrokeYes = 1, No = 0
CancerYes = 1, No = 0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
AsthmaYes = 1, No = 0
DementiaYes = 1, No = 0
DepressionYes = 1, No = 0
AnxietyYes = 1, No = 0
Substance Abuse disordersYes = 1, No = 0
OsteoporosisYes = 1, No = 0
Fracture at osteoporotic siteYes = 1, No = 0
ArthritisYes = 1, No = 0
Symptoms
Excessive bruisingYes = 1, No = 0
Joint pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Muscle pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Back pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Weakness in arms/legsYes = 1, No = 0
Fall easilyYes = 1, No = 0
Weight gain >10 poundsYes = 1, No = 0
Sleep difficultyYes = 1, No = 0
Sad most of the timeYes = 1, No = 0
Restless and irritableYes = 1, No = 0
Anxious or nervousYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty concentratingYes = 1, No = 0
Little interest in relationships or activitiesYes = 1, No = 0
Activity of Daily living
Difficulty preparing mealsYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty eatingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty dressingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty using toiletYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty housekeepingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty climbing stairsYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty bathingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty walkingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty using transportationYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty getting in/out of bedYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty taking medicationsYes = 1, No = 0
Need assistive deviceYes = 1, No = 0
Need device for breathingYes = 1, No = 0
Climbing 2 flights of stairsNo, can’t do at all = 1
Yes, with difficulty = 0.5
Yes with no difficulty = 0
Variables used in frailty indexPoints assigned
Comorbidities
Body mass index, kg/m2<18.5 or ≥30 = 1
25 to <30 = 0.5
18.5 to <25 = 0
HypertensionYes = 1, No = 0
DiabetesYes = 1, No = 0
HyperlipidemiaYes = 1, No = 0
Chronic kidney diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
Coronary artery diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
Cardiac arrhythmiaYes = 1, No = 0
Atrial fibrillationYes = 1, No = 0
Congestive heart failureYes = 1, No = 0
StrokeYes = 1, No = 0
CancerYes = 1, No = 0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
AsthmaYes = 1, No = 0
DementiaYes = 1, No = 0
DepressionYes = 1, No = 0
AnxietyYes = 1, No = 0
Substance Abuse disordersYes = 1, No = 0
OsteoporosisYes = 1, No = 0
Fracture at osteoporotic siteYes = 1, No = 0
ArthritisYes = 1, No = 0
Symptoms
Excessive bruisingYes = 1, No = 0
Joint pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Muscle pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Back pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Weakness in arms/legsYes = 1, No = 0
Fall easilyYes = 1, No = 0
Weight gain >10 poundsYes = 1, No = 0
Sleep difficultyYes = 1, No = 0
Sad most of the timeYes = 1, No = 0
Restless and irritableYes = 1, No = 0
Anxious or nervousYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty concentratingYes = 1, No = 0
Little interest in relationships or activitiesYes = 1, No = 0
Activity of Daily living
Difficulty preparing mealsYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty eatingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty dressingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty using toiletYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty housekeepingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty climbing stairsYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty bathingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty walkingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty using transportationYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty getting in/out of bedYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty taking medicationsYes = 1, No = 0
Need assistive deviceYes = 1, No = 0
Need device for breathingYes = 1, No = 0
Climbing 2 flights of stairsNo, can’t do at all = 1
Yes, with difficulty = 0.5
Yes with no difficulty = 0

aThe Frailty index is calculated as the cumulative points divided by 47 (range of 0-1).

Table 1.

Variables Used to Calculate the Frailty Indexa

Variables used in frailty indexPoints assigned
Comorbidities
Body mass index, kg/m2<18.5 or ≥30 = 1
25 to <30 = 0.5
18.5 to <25 = 0
HypertensionYes = 1, No = 0
DiabetesYes = 1, No = 0
HyperlipidemiaYes = 1, No = 0
Chronic kidney diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
Coronary artery diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
Cardiac arrhythmiaYes = 1, No = 0
Atrial fibrillationYes = 1, No = 0
Congestive heart failureYes = 1, No = 0
StrokeYes = 1, No = 0
CancerYes = 1, No = 0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
AsthmaYes = 1, No = 0
DementiaYes = 1, No = 0
DepressionYes = 1, No = 0
AnxietyYes = 1, No = 0
Substance Abuse disordersYes = 1, No = 0
OsteoporosisYes = 1, No = 0
Fracture at osteoporotic siteYes = 1, No = 0
ArthritisYes = 1, No = 0
Symptoms
Excessive bruisingYes = 1, No = 0
Joint pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Muscle pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Back pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Weakness in arms/legsYes = 1, No = 0
Fall easilyYes = 1, No = 0
Weight gain >10 poundsYes = 1, No = 0
Sleep difficultyYes = 1, No = 0
Sad most of the timeYes = 1, No = 0
Restless and irritableYes = 1, No = 0
Anxious or nervousYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty concentratingYes = 1, No = 0
Little interest in relationships or activitiesYes = 1, No = 0
Activity of Daily living
Difficulty preparing mealsYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty eatingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty dressingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty using toiletYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty housekeepingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty climbing stairsYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty bathingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty walkingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty using transportationYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty getting in/out of bedYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty taking medicationsYes = 1, No = 0
Need assistive deviceYes = 1, No = 0
Need device for breathingYes = 1, No = 0
Climbing 2 flights of stairsNo, can’t do at all = 1
Yes, with difficulty = 0.5
Yes with no difficulty = 0
Variables used in frailty indexPoints assigned
Comorbidities
Body mass index, kg/m2<18.5 or ≥30 = 1
25 to <30 = 0.5
18.5 to <25 = 0
HypertensionYes = 1, No = 0
DiabetesYes = 1, No = 0
HyperlipidemiaYes = 1, No = 0
Chronic kidney diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
Coronary artery diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
Cardiac arrhythmiaYes = 1, No = 0
Atrial fibrillationYes = 1, No = 0
Congestive heart failureYes = 1, No = 0
StrokeYes = 1, No = 0
CancerYes = 1, No = 0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseYes = 1, No = 0
AsthmaYes = 1, No = 0
DementiaYes = 1, No = 0
DepressionYes = 1, No = 0
AnxietyYes = 1, No = 0
Substance Abuse disordersYes = 1, No = 0
OsteoporosisYes = 1, No = 0
Fracture at osteoporotic siteYes = 1, No = 0
ArthritisYes = 1, No = 0
Symptoms
Excessive bruisingYes = 1, No = 0
Joint pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Muscle pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Back pain/stiffnessYes = 1, No = 0
Weakness in arms/legsYes = 1, No = 0
Fall easilyYes = 1, No = 0
Weight gain >10 poundsYes = 1, No = 0
Sleep difficultyYes = 1, No = 0
Sad most of the timeYes = 1, No = 0
Restless and irritableYes = 1, No = 0
Anxious or nervousYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty concentratingYes = 1, No = 0
Little interest in relationships or activitiesYes = 1, No = 0
Activity of Daily living
Difficulty preparing mealsYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty eatingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty dressingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty using toiletYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty housekeepingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty climbing stairsYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty bathingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty walkingYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty using transportationYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty getting in/out of bedYes = 1, No = 0
Difficulty taking medicationsYes = 1, No = 0
Need assistive deviceYes = 1, No = 0
Need device for breathingYes = 1, No = 0
Climbing 2 flights of stairsNo, can’t do at all = 1
Yes, with difficulty = 0.5
Yes with no difficulty = 0

aThe Frailty index is calculated as the cumulative points divided by 47 (range of 0-1).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data are presented as frequencies for categorical variables and medians with ranges for continuous variables. Multiple logistic regression was used to predict DST group status using age, sex, and BMI. A propensity score approach was used to compare the prevalence of comorbidities in the 2 DST groups, adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. Inverse probability weights were estimated using predictions from the logistic regression model and these weights were applied to each subject to determine adjusted (weighted) percentages and P values. Similar subgroup analyses were repeated stratifying on age (<65, 65+). Finally, the Pearson partial correlation was used to quantify the relationship between the Frailty Index and DST after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. Analyses were run using the R statistical environment (version 3.6.2). Weighted chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were calculated using the sjstats R package (24). P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Of 1081 patients with adrenal adenoma and a DST evaluated at Mayo Clinic during the study period, 2 patients age <20 years were excluded, no consent was obtained from 8 patients, and 268 patients were excluded due to no CVI that included questions of interest within ± 1 year of index. Another 302 patients were excluded due to lack of prior medical records of at least 1 year, and another 58 patients due to another concomitant adrenal disorder (Fig. 1). Ultimately, our cohort included 443 patients with adrenal adenoma: 168 (38%) patients with MACS and 275 (62%) patients with NFAT. Patients with MACS were older at the time of evaluation (median age of 66 years (range, 30-91) in MACS patients vs median age of 59 years (range, 21-84) years in patients with NFAT; P < 0.01). Patients with MACS and NFAT demonstrated a female predominance, without differences between subgroups (MACS, 113 [67%] vs NFAT, 167 (61%); P = 0.17). BMI was similar between patients with MACS and patients with NFAT (Table 2).

Flow diagram for selection of cohort.
Figure 1.

Flow diagram for selection of cohort.

Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Adrenal Adenoma

DST <1.9 μg/dLDST = 1.9-5.0 μg/dLP value
N275168
Age, years; median (range)59.5 (20.8-83.9)66.1 (29.9-91.2)<0.001
Women, n (%)167 (60.7)113 (67.3)0.166
DST, μg/dL; median (range)1.2 (0.9-1.8)2.6 (1.9-4.9)
ACTH, pg/mL; median (range)
Missing
14.0 (5.0-38.0)
207
10.5 (4.9-59.0)
116
0.066
DHEA-S, mcg/dL; median (range)
Missing
57.0 (1.9-538.0)
216
36.0 (14.0-223.0)
123
0.006
BMI, kg/m2; median (range)
BMI, n (%)
10-18.9
19-25.9
26-29.9
30+
Missing
32 (15-68)
2 (0.7)
39 (14.2)
63 (22.9)
171 (62.2)
0
31 (18-58)
2 (1.2)
35 (21.0)
41 (24.6)
89 (53.3)
1
0.041
0.202
Tumor sizea, mm
Median (range)
Missing
17
(3-71)
3
26
(5-110)
1
<0.001
Duration of prior medical history, years
Median (range)
21.7 (1.0-42.2)22.9 (1.0-40.7)0.942
Smoke or other tobacco use, n(%)
Never
Former
Current
Missing
108 (41.2)
96 (36.6)
58 (22.1)
13
56 (36.4)
65 (42.2)
33 (21.4)
14
0.502
You/Others felt you needed to reduce alcohol consumption, n (%)
Missing
17 (6.9)
30
11 (7.0)
11
0.979
Elixhauser indexb, sum (median, range)
Elixhauser, n (%)
0-1
2-4
5+
2 (0-17)
93 (33.8)
113 (41.1)
69 (25.1)
4 (0-15)
42 (25.0)
64 (38.1)
62 (36.9)
0.002
0.020
DST <1.9 μg/dLDST = 1.9-5.0 μg/dLP value
N275168
Age, years; median (range)59.5 (20.8-83.9)66.1 (29.9-91.2)<0.001
Women, n (%)167 (60.7)113 (67.3)0.166
DST, μg/dL; median (range)1.2 (0.9-1.8)2.6 (1.9-4.9)
ACTH, pg/mL; median (range)
Missing
14.0 (5.0-38.0)
207
10.5 (4.9-59.0)
116
0.066
DHEA-S, mcg/dL; median (range)
Missing
57.0 (1.9-538.0)
216
36.0 (14.0-223.0)
123
0.006
BMI, kg/m2; median (range)
BMI, n (%)
10-18.9
19-25.9
26-29.9
30+
Missing
32 (15-68)
2 (0.7)
39 (14.2)
63 (22.9)
171 (62.2)
0
31 (18-58)
2 (1.2)
35 (21.0)
41 (24.6)
89 (53.3)
1
0.041
0.202
Tumor sizea, mm
Median (range)
Missing
17
(3-71)
3
26
(5-110)
1
<0.001
Duration of prior medical history, years
Median (range)
21.7 (1.0-42.2)22.9 (1.0-40.7)0.942
Smoke or other tobacco use, n(%)
Never
Former
Current
Missing
108 (41.2)
96 (36.6)
58 (22.1)
13
56 (36.4)
65 (42.2)
33 (21.4)
14
0.502
You/Others felt you needed to reduce alcohol consumption, n (%)
Missing
17 (6.9)
30
11 (7.0)
11
0.979
Elixhauser indexb, sum (median, range)
Elixhauser, n (%)
0-1
2-4
5+
2 (0-17)
93 (33.8)
113 (41.1)
69 (25.1)
4 (0-15)
42 (25.0)
64 (38.1)
62 (36.9)
0.002
0.020

Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; BMI, body mass index; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; DST, 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test.

aLarger diameter (if >1 tumor) on closest image to index date (median days from image to index was 18 days (IQR = 1 day to 87 days prior to index date; range -16 years-9 years after index date).

bElixhauser comorbidity index categorizes comorbidities of patients based on the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes; data within 5 years prior to the index date was used for this calculation.

Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Adrenal Adenoma

DST <1.9 μg/dLDST = 1.9-5.0 μg/dLP value
N275168
Age, years; median (range)59.5 (20.8-83.9)66.1 (29.9-91.2)<0.001
Women, n (%)167 (60.7)113 (67.3)0.166
DST, μg/dL; median (range)1.2 (0.9-1.8)2.6 (1.9-4.9)
ACTH, pg/mL; median (range)
Missing
14.0 (5.0-38.0)
207
10.5 (4.9-59.0)
116
0.066
DHEA-S, mcg/dL; median (range)
Missing
57.0 (1.9-538.0)
216
36.0 (14.0-223.0)
123
0.006
BMI, kg/m2; median (range)
BMI, n (%)
10-18.9
19-25.9
26-29.9
30+
Missing
32 (15-68)
2 (0.7)
39 (14.2)
63 (22.9)
171 (62.2)
0
31 (18-58)
2 (1.2)
35 (21.0)
41 (24.6)
89 (53.3)
1
0.041
0.202
Tumor sizea, mm
Median (range)
Missing
17
(3-71)
3
26
(5-110)
1
<0.001
Duration of prior medical history, years
Median (range)
21.7 (1.0-42.2)22.9 (1.0-40.7)0.942
Smoke or other tobacco use, n(%)
Never
Former
Current
Missing
108 (41.2)
96 (36.6)
58 (22.1)
13
56 (36.4)
65 (42.2)
33 (21.4)
14
0.502
You/Others felt you needed to reduce alcohol consumption, n (%)
Missing
17 (6.9)
30
11 (7.0)
11
0.979
Elixhauser indexb, sum (median, range)
Elixhauser, n (%)
0-1
2-4
5+
2 (0-17)
93 (33.8)
113 (41.1)
69 (25.1)
4 (0-15)
42 (25.0)
64 (38.1)
62 (36.9)
0.002
0.020
DST <1.9 μg/dLDST = 1.9-5.0 μg/dLP value
N275168
Age, years; median (range)59.5 (20.8-83.9)66.1 (29.9-91.2)<0.001
Women, n (%)167 (60.7)113 (67.3)0.166
DST, μg/dL; median (range)1.2 (0.9-1.8)2.6 (1.9-4.9)
ACTH, pg/mL; median (range)
Missing
14.0 (5.0-38.0)
207
10.5 (4.9-59.0)
116
0.066
DHEA-S, mcg/dL; median (range)
Missing
57.0 (1.9-538.0)
216
36.0 (14.0-223.0)
123
0.006
BMI, kg/m2; median (range)
BMI, n (%)
10-18.9
19-25.9
26-29.9
30+
Missing
32 (15-68)
2 (0.7)
39 (14.2)
63 (22.9)
171 (62.2)
0
31 (18-58)
2 (1.2)
35 (21.0)
41 (24.6)
89 (53.3)
1
0.041
0.202
Tumor sizea, mm
Median (range)
Missing
17
(3-71)
3
26
(5-110)
1
<0.001
Duration of prior medical history, years
Median (range)
21.7 (1.0-42.2)22.9 (1.0-40.7)0.942
Smoke or other tobacco use, n(%)
Never
Former
Current
Missing
108 (41.2)
96 (36.6)
58 (22.1)
13
56 (36.4)
65 (42.2)
33 (21.4)
14
0.502
You/Others felt you needed to reduce alcohol consumption, n (%)
Missing
17 (6.9)
30
11 (7.0)
11
0.979
Elixhauser indexb, sum (median, range)
Elixhauser, n (%)
0-1
2-4
5+
2 (0-17)
93 (33.8)
113 (41.1)
69 (25.1)
4 (0-15)
42 (25.0)
64 (38.1)
62 (36.9)
0.002
0.020

Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; BMI, body mass index; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; DST, 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test.

aLarger diameter (if >1 tumor) on closest image to index date (median days from image to index was 18 days (IQR = 1 day to 87 days prior to index date; range -16 years-9 years after index date).

bElixhauser comorbidity index categorizes comorbidities of patients based on the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes; data within 5 years prior to the index date was used for this calculation.

Age, sex, and BMI-adjusted analysis of comorbidities demonstrated a higher prevalence of most comorbidities in patients with MACS as compared with patients with NFAT (Table 3). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity with higher prevalence in patients with MACS (71.4% vs 59.4%) than in patients with NFAT (P = 0.014). Patients with MACS have also demonstrated higher prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias (49.7% vs 39.8%; P = 0.049) and chronic kidney disease (25.3% vs 16.9%; P = 0.044) when compared with patients with NFAT. In contrast, prevalence of asthma was 3 times less prevalent in patients with MACS (14.5% versus 5.4%) than in patients with NFAT (P = 0.005).

Table 3.

Prevalence of Deficits in Patients with MACS and NFAT

DST <1.9 μg/dL
N = 275
DST = 1.9-5.0 μg/dL
N = 168
P value
Comorbidities, n(%)a
Hypertension59.471.40.014
Diabetes40.141.90.801
Hyperlipidemia 59.562.10.682
Chronic kidney disease16.925.30.044
Coronary artery disease25.529.50.411
Cardiac arrhythmia39.849.70.049
Atrial fibrillation6.710.00.271
Congestive heart failure4.99.40.086
Stroke8.710.80.654
Cancer32.136.80.371
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease18.416.60.700
Asthma14.55.40.005
Dementia4.36.80.282
Depression28.221.80.163
Anxiety21.220.20.846
Substance Abuse disorders14.513.81.000
Osteoporosis10.711.70.855
Fracture at osteoporotic site2.44.60.169
Arthritis40.945.80.342
Symptoms, n (%)a
Excessive bruising4.07.10.188
Joint pain/stiffness25.828.40.640
Muscle pain/stiffness19.124.50.213
Back pain/stiffness28.435.10.162
Weakness in arms/legs10.820.70.006
Fall easily2.36.90.023
Weight gain > 10 pounds11.717.00.153
Sleep difficulty14.926.30.005
Sad most of the time4.87.50.306
Restless and irritable8.110.20.605
Anxious or nervous11.316.90.128
Difficulty concentrating10.38.70.717
Little interest in relationships or activities6.54.50.530
Activity of daily living, n (%)a
Difficulty preparing meals2.95.20.309
Difficulty eating0.30.41.000
Difficulty dressing1.93.30.349
Difficulty using toilet0.51.10.562
Difficulty housekeeping11.210.70.925
Difficulty climbing stairs16.521.10.272
Difficulty bathing3.84.30.805
Difficulty walking10.514.70.259
Difficulty using transportation2.84.10.591
Difficulty getting in/out of bed2.33.10.756
Difficulty taking medications2.14.70.167
Need assistive device8.411.60.339
Need device for breathing10.111.10.899
Climbing 2 flights of stairs
“No, can’t do at all”
“Yes, with difficulty”
“Yes, with no difficulty”
8.6
27.5
63.9
14.7
30.2
55.1
0.071
DST <1.9 μg/dL
N = 275
DST = 1.9-5.0 μg/dL
N = 168
P value
Comorbidities, n(%)a
Hypertension59.471.40.014
Diabetes40.141.90.801
Hyperlipidemia 59.562.10.682
Chronic kidney disease16.925.30.044
Coronary artery disease25.529.50.411
Cardiac arrhythmia39.849.70.049
Atrial fibrillation6.710.00.271
Congestive heart failure4.99.40.086
Stroke8.710.80.654
Cancer32.136.80.371
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease18.416.60.700
Asthma14.55.40.005
Dementia4.36.80.282
Depression28.221.80.163
Anxiety21.220.20.846
Substance Abuse disorders14.513.81.000
Osteoporosis10.711.70.855
Fracture at osteoporotic site2.44.60.169
Arthritis40.945.80.342
Symptoms, n (%)a
Excessive bruising4.07.10.188
Joint pain/stiffness25.828.40.640
Muscle pain/stiffness19.124.50.213
Back pain/stiffness28.435.10.162
Weakness in arms/legs10.820.70.006
Fall easily2.36.90.023
Weight gain > 10 pounds11.717.00.153
Sleep difficulty14.926.30.005
Sad most of the time4.87.50.306
Restless and irritable8.110.20.605
Anxious or nervous11.316.90.128
Difficulty concentrating10.38.70.717
Little interest in relationships or activities6.54.50.530
Activity of daily living, n (%)a
Difficulty preparing meals2.95.20.309
Difficulty eating0.30.41.000
Difficulty dressing1.93.30.349
Difficulty using toilet0.51.10.562
Difficulty housekeeping11.210.70.925
Difficulty climbing stairs16.521.10.272
Difficulty bathing3.84.30.805
Difficulty walking10.514.70.259
Difficulty using transportation2.84.10.591
Difficulty getting in/out of bed2.33.10.756
Difficulty taking medications2.14.70.167
Need assistive device8.411.60.339
Need device for breathing10.111.10.899
Climbing 2 flights of stairs
“No, can’t do at all”
“Yes, with difficulty”
“Yes, with no difficulty”
8.6
27.5
63.9
14.7
30.2
55.1
0.071

aWeighted percentages adjusted for age, sex, and BMI.

Table 3.

Prevalence of Deficits in Patients with MACS and NFAT

DST <1.9 μg/dL
N = 275
DST = 1.9-5.0 μg/dL
N = 168
P value
Comorbidities, n(%)a
Hypertension59.471.40.014
Diabetes40.141.90.801
Hyperlipidemia 59.562.10.682
Chronic kidney disease16.925.30.044
Coronary artery disease25.529.50.411
Cardiac arrhythmia39.849.70.049
Atrial fibrillation6.710.00.271
Congestive heart failure4.99.40.086
Stroke8.710.80.654
Cancer32.136.80.371
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease18.416.60.700
Asthma14.55.40.005
Dementia4.36.80.282
Depression28.221.80.163
Anxiety21.220.20.846
Substance Abuse disorders14.513.81.000
Osteoporosis10.711.70.855
Fracture at osteoporotic site2.44.60.169
Arthritis40.945.80.342
Symptoms, n (%)a
Excessive bruising4.07.10.188
Joint pain/stiffness25.828.40.640
Muscle pain/stiffness19.124.50.213
Back pain/stiffness28.435.10.162
Weakness in arms/legs10.820.70.006
Fall easily2.36.90.023
Weight gain > 10 pounds11.717.00.153
Sleep difficulty14.926.30.005
Sad most of the time4.87.50.306
Restless and irritable8.110.20.605
Anxious or nervous11.316.90.128
Difficulty concentrating10.38.70.717
Little interest in relationships or activities6.54.50.530
Activity of daily living, n (%)a
Difficulty preparing meals2.95.20.309
Difficulty eating0.30.41.000
Difficulty dressing1.93.30.349
Difficulty using toilet0.51.10.562
Difficulty housekeeping11.210.70.925
Difficulty climbing stairs16.521.10.272
Difficulty bathing3.84.30.805
Difficulty walking10.514.70.259
Difficulty using transportation2.84.10.591
Difficulty getting in/out of bed2.33.10.756
Difficulty taking medications2.14.70.167
Need assistive device8.411.60.339
Need device for breathing10.111.10.899
Climbing 2 flights of stairs
“No, can’t do at all”
“Yes, with difficulty”
“Yes, with no difficulty”
8.6
27.5
63.9
14.7
30.2
55.1
0.071
DST <1.9 μg/dL
N = 275
DST = 1.9-5.0 μg/dL
N = 168
P value
Comorbidities, n(%)a
Hypertension59.471.40.014
Diabetes40.141.90.801
Hyperlipidemia 59.562.10.682
Chronic kidney disease16.925.30.044
Coronary artery disease25.529.50.411
Cardiac arrhythmia39.849.70.049
Atrial fibrillation6.710.00.271
Congestive heart failure4.99.40.086
Stroke8.710.80.654
Cancer32.136.80.371
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease18.416.60.700
Asthma14.55.40.005
Dementia4.36.80.282
Depression28.221.80.163
Anxiety21.220.20.846
Substance Abuse disorders14.513.81.000
Osteoporosis10.711.70.855
Fracture at osteoporotic site2.44.60.169
Arthritis40.945.80.342
Symptoms, n (%)a
Excessive bruising4.07.10.188
Joint pain/stiffness25.828.40.640
Muscle pain/stiffness19.124.50.213
Back pain/stiffness28.435.10.162
Weakness in arms/legs10.820.70.006
Fall easily2.36.90.023
Weight gain > 10 pounds11.717.00.153
Sleep difficulty14.926.30.005
Sad most of the time4.87.50.306
Restless and irritable8.110.20.605
Anxious or nervous11.316.90.128
Difficulty concentrating10.38.70.717
Little interest in relationships or activities6.54.50.530
Activity of daily living, n (%)a
Difficulty preparing meals2.95.20.309
Difficulty eating0.30.41.000
Difficulty dressing1.93.30.349
Difficulty using toilet0.51.10.562
Difficulty housekeeping11.210.70.925
Difficulty climbing stairs16.521.10.272
Difficulty bathing3.84.30.805
Difficulty walking10.514.70.259
Difficulty using transportation2.84.10.591
Difficulty getting in/out of bed2.33.10.756
Difficulty taking medications2.14.70.167
Need assistive device8.411.60.339
Need device for breathing10.111.10.899
Climbing 2 flights of stairs
“No, can’t do at all”
“Yes, with difficulty”
“Yes, with no difficulty”
8.6
27.5
63.9
14.7
30.2
55.1
0.071

aWeighted percentages adjusted for age, sex, and BMI.

Twice as many patients with MACS than patients with NFAT reported symptoms of arm and leg weakness at the time of evaluation (20.7% vs 10.8%; P = 0.006), with a 3-fold higher tendency to fall easily in patients with MACS (6.9% vs 2.3%; P = 0.023). Patients with MACS also more frequently reported having sleeping difficulty (26.3% vs 14.9%; P = 0.005).

Age-, sex-, and BMI-adjusted frailty index was higher in patients with MACS (0.17 [range, 0-0.6] vs 0.15 [range, 0-0.6] in patients with NFAT; P = 0.009) (Fig. 2). The overall prevalence of patients classified as frail and prefrail was 24.2% and 53.7%, respectively, in patients with MACS and 18.0% and 48.7%, respectively, in patients with NFAT (Fig. 3). Subgroup analysis of patients with NFAT and MACS based on age demonstrated no significant differences in the number of comorbidities and frailty index in patients <65 years of age, but significantly higher frailty index in those ≥65 years of age (MACS median, 0.18 [range, 0.03-0.6] vs NFAT median, 0.15 [0.01-0.45]) (Supplemental Table 4) (15). After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, cortisol after DST was associated with frailty index (partial correlation = 0.14; P = 0.004), Supplemental Figure 1 (15).

Distribution of frailty index in patients based on DST category.
Figure 2.

Distribution of frailty index in patients based on DST category.

Proportion of frail, prefrail, and not frail patients based on DST category.
Figure 3.

Proportion of frail, prefrail, and not frail patients based on DST category.

Discussion

In this study, we found that patients with MACS present with a higher burden of comorbidities, adverse symptoms, and frailty compared with patients with NFAT.

Frailty is a state of increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes and is a unique way of looking into overall health status (9). Frailty index is one of the methods of frailty assessment that works on the principle that multiple small deficits may not be clinically significant, however, when coexisting can have an impact on overall health (14). Frailty, assessed through frailty index, was previously reported to predict adverse health outcomes in the community-dwelling older population and patients with comorbidities such as HIV, systemic sclerosis, and chronic kidney disease (25-27).

In our study we have found that patients with MACS presented with a higher median frailty index when compared with patients with NFAT. Using a frailty index cutoff of 0.25 to define frailty, 24% of patients with MACS were frail, versus 18% of patients with NFAT, confirming that mild but chronic cortisol excess is associated with frailty. Previous studies on patients without adrenal mass reported higher cortisol concentrations, blunting of circadian cortisol secretion, and suboptimal suppression with DST in frail patients when compared to non-frail patients (28-30). Patients with MACS have mild but chronic exposure to endogenous cortisol, possibly making them vulnerable to premature aging and development of frailty. Notably, median frailty index of 0.15 in our patients with NFAT was higher than the frailty index of 0.13 reported in a community-dwelling population of similar age (31, 32). One of the explanations for higher frailty index in patients with NFAT could be abnormal cortisol secretion not detected by the standard-of-care DST. Patients with NFAT have been previously reported to have lower skeletal mass and higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in comparison with patients with no adrenal mass (3, 33). Another explanation for higher frailty index in patients with NFAT is a selection bias in our cohort, as patients diagnosed with NFAT represent patients who seek medical attention and are more likely to be diagnosed with other medical conditions. Subgroup analysis based on an age cutoff of 65 years further demonstrated a higher frailty index only in older patients with MACS as compared to those with NFAT. This could be explained by a longer duration of exposure, or possibly a higher susceptibility of older patients to cortisol excess, and thus higher prevalence of comorbidities and symptoms contributing to frailty in older patients with MACS.

Fall risk and ADLs are important components of physical health evaluation of an aging individual. Besides direct fall-related injury, the presence of fear of falling increases risk of all-cause mortality in the aging population (34), through a multifactorial process associated with greater functional decline, anxiety, and depression along with increased use of medical services (35, 36). In our study, patients with MACS have 3-fold higher tendency to fall in comparison to patients with NFAT, suggesting an effect of mild abnormal cortisol secretion on multiple systems. Patients with MACS have been reported to have a higher risk of fractures, thought to be related to cortisol-induced abnormal bone metabolism, and abnormal bone density and bone quality (5). The higher tendency to fall in patients with MACS may reflect underlying deconditioning and sarcopenia, and it represents an additional risk factor for fractures.

We found that patients with MACS have a higher prevalence of hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, and chronic kidney disease in comparison with patients with NFAT. Patients with MACS were previously reported to have a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (such as hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes) (3, 4). With follow-up, patients with MACS are more likely to develop or worsen the existing cardiovascular risk factors (3), while adrenalectomy resulted in improvement in several cardiovascular risk factors (7). A recent study found a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation at baseline (8.5% vs 3.1%), as well as at the end of a 7.7 year follow-up period (20% vs 12%) in patients with MACS as compared with patients with NFAT (37). In our study, higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation in patients with MACS (10% vs 6.7% in NFAT) has not reached statistical significance. However, almost half of patients with MACS were diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmias (as opposed to 39.8% in NFAT). It is unclear whether some of the diagnoses of atrial fibrillation in our study were included under a more general diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmia; nevertheless, our results are concordant with the recently reported association of hypercortisolism with abnormal cardiac conduction. We found that prevalence of CKD was significantly higher in patients with MACS compared with NFAT, possibly due to direct effect of cortisol on kidney function, or due to a higher prevalence of hypertension in patients with MACS. Another interesting finding from our study was the lower prevalence of asthma in patients with MACS in comparison to those with NFAT. It is possible that chronic cortisol secretion in MACS is protective or curative in asthma, similar to low dose prednisone therapy.

The strengths of this study are the relatively large sample size, robust inclusion criteria, and the novel use of frailty index to characterize the overall health status of patients with adrenal tumors. In the construction of a frailty index to assess our population, we followed the recommended construct previously validated in other studies. Inclusion of ADLs and symptoms in addition to comorbidities resulted in a more representative assessment of overall health status in our population. Our study has several limitations. Due to retrospective nature of our study, information bias is likely. We relied on ICD9 codes for diagnosis of comorbidities and CVI information reported by patients at the time of the visit. We attempted to minimize this bias by excluding patients with <1 year clinical history at our institution or incomplete CVI. As patients were evaluated at the outpatient endocrine clinic, selection bias towards patients with other endocrine conditions is likely, and prevalence of diabetes (the only endocrine condition included in the frailty index) could be inflated. We acknowledge that patients evaluated at a tertiary center may have a higher frailty index than those evaluated for adrenal adenoma in other settings. We included only patients with available DST and at least 1 year of follow-up, possibly reflecting a higher level of care or morbidity in our cohort, and our results may not be generalizable to other settings. While the overall prevalence of frailty may be higher in our patients, the difference between MACS and NFAT should represent a true estimate. In addition, while we have demonstrated an association of frailty with MACS, we are not able to establish causality, and it is possible that frail patients are more likely to have an abnormal DST (as opposed to MACS causing frailty). Frailty index in patients with MACS needs to be further validated prospectively.

Frailty index assessment in patients with adrenal adenomas may have several clinical implications. Frailty index is easy to calculate (based on patient current visit information and diagnostic codes) and integrate in clinical care. It could be useful in baseline assessment when discussing management options of follow-up versus adrenalectomy with the patient. Frailty index could also be followed longitudinally in a patient with MACS followed conservatively to estimate any decline in health, and possibly reassess management options. Frailty index potential reversibility with adrenalectomy could be a more objective measure of therapeutic success and could be integrated in both clinical and research settings.

In conclusion, we assessed frailty in patients with adenomas using a comprehensive frailty index constructed from 47 symptoms, ADL, and comorbidities. In a sex-, age-, and BMI-adjusted analysis, we found that patients with MACS present with a higher prevalence of frailty when compared with patients with NFAT, suggestive of detrimental effect of cortisol on aging. Frailty index could be a useful clinical tool to individualize discussion on management options with patients with MACS. The impact of adrenalectomy on reversal of frailty needs to be determined in longitudinal studies.

Abbreviations

    Abbreviations
     
  • ADL

    activities of daily living

  •  
  • BMI

    body mass index

  •  
  • CVI

    current visit information

  •  
  • DST

    dexamethasone suppression test

  •  
  • MACS

    mild autonomous cortisol secretion

  •  
  • NFAT

    nonfunctioning adrenal tumors

Acknowledgments

Financial Support: This research was supported by the James A. Ruppe Career Development Award in Endocrinology (I.B.) and the Catalyst Award for Advancing in Academics from Mayo Clinic (I.B.). This research was partly supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award K23DK121888 (to I.B.). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institutes of Health.

Additional Information

Disclosure Summary: I.B. reports advisory board participation with Corcept and HRA Pharma outside the submitted work.

Data Availability: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

1.

Reimondo
G
,
Castellano
E
,
Grosso
M
, et al.
Adrenal incidentalomas are tied to increased risk of diabetes: findings from a prospective study
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2020
;105(4):dgz284. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgz284

2.

Fassnacht
M
,
Arlt
W
,
Bancos
I
, et al.
Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of endocrinology clinical practice guideline in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal tumors
.
Eur J Endocrinol.
2016
;
175
(
2
):
G1
-
G34
.

3.

Elhassan
YS
,
Alahdab
F
,
Prete
A
, et al.
Natural history of adrenal incidentalomas with and without mild autonomous cortisol excess: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ann Intern Med.
2019
;
171
(
2
):
107
-
116
.

4.

Delivanis
DA
,
Athimulam
S
,
Bancos
I
.
Modern Management of Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion
.
Clin Pharmacol Ther.
2019
;
106
(
6
):
1209
-
1221
.

5.

Athimulam
S
,
Bancos
I
.
Evaluation of bone health in patients with adrenal tumors
.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes.
2019
;
26
(
3
):
125
-
132
.

6.

Chiodini
I
,
Mascia
ML
,
Muscarella
S
, et al.
Subclinical hypercortisolism among outpatients referred for osteoporosis
.
Ann Intern Med.
2007
;
147
(
8
):
541
-
548
.

7.

Bancos
I
,
Alahdab
F
,
Crowley
RK
, et al.
Therapy of Endocrine Disease: improvement of cardiovascular risk factors after adrenalectomy in patients with adrenal tumors and subclinical Cushing’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur J Endocrinol.
2016
;
175
(
6
):
R283
-
R295
.

8.

Clegg
A
,
Young
J
,
Iliffe
S
,
Rikkert
MO
,
Rockwood
K
.
Frailty in elderly people
.
Lancet.
2013
;
381
(
9868
):
752
-
762
.

9.

Searle
SD
,
Mitnitski
A
,
Gahbauer
EA
,
Gill
TM
,
Rockwood
K
.
A standard procedure for creating a frailty index
.
BMC Geriatr.
2008
;
8
:
24
.

10.

Patel
A
,
Goodman
SG
,
Yan
AT
, et al.
Frailty and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CONCORDANCE Registry
.
J Am Heart Assoc.
2018
;
7
(
18
):
e009859
.

11.

Boxer
R
,
Kleppinger
A
,
Ahmad
A
,
Annis
K
,
Hager
D
,
Kenny
A
.
The 6-minute walk is associated with frailty and predicts mortality in older adults with heart failure
.
Congest Heart Fail.
2010
;
16
(
5
):
208
-
213
.

12.

Mrdutt
MM
,
Papaconstantinou
HT
,
Robinson
BD
,
Bird
ET
,
Isbell
CL
.
Preoperative Frailty and Surgical Outcomes Across Diverse Surgical Subspecialties in a Large Health Care System
.
J Am Coll Surg.
2019
;
228
(
4
):
482
-
490
.

13.

Bagshaw
M
,
Majumdar
SR
,
Rolfson
DB
,
Ibrahim
Q
,
McDermid
RC
,
Stelfox
HT
.
A prospective multicenter cohort study of frailty in younger critically ill patients
.
Crit Care.
2016
;
20
(
1
):
175
.

14.

Legge
A
,
Kirkland
S
,
Rockwood
K
, et al.
Construction of a Frailty Index as a Novel Health Measure in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
.
J Rheumatol.
2020
;
47
(
1
):
72
-
81
.

15.

Singh
S
,
Atkinson
E
,
Achenbach
S
,
LeBrasseur
N
,
Bancos
I
.
Data from: Frailty in patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion is higher than in patients with nonfunctioning adrenal tumors
. Deposited on July 14, 2020. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12385619.v42020

16.

Goodman
RA
,
Posner
SF
,
Huang
ES
,
Parekh
AK
,
Koh
HK
.
Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice
.
Prev Chronic Dis.
2013
;
10
:
E66
.

17.

Rocca
WA
,
Gazzuola-Rocca
L
,
Smith
CY
, et al.
Accelerated accumulation of multimorbidity after bilateral oophorectomy: a population-based cohort study
.
Mayo Clin Proc.
2016
;
91
(
11
):
1577
-
1589
.

18.

Colón-Emeric
CS
,
Saag
KG
.
Osteoporotic fractures in older adults
.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol.
2006
;
20
(
4
):
695
-
706
.

19.

Boriani
G
.
Atrial fibrillation and aging: risky mutual relationships
.
Chest.
2016
;
149
(
2
):
301
-
302
.

20.

Bobo
WV
,
Yawn
BP
,
St Sauver
JL
,
Grossardt
BR
,
Boyd
CM
,
Rocca
WA
.
Prevalence of combined somatic and mental health multimorbidity: patterns by age, sex, and race/ethnicity
.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.
2016
;
71
(
11
):
1483
-
1491
.

21.

Song
X
,
Mitnitski
A
,
Rockwood
K
.
Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation
.
J Am Geriatr Soc.
2010
;
58
(
4
):
681
-
687
.

22.

Rockwood
K
,
Andrew
M
,
Mitnitski
A
.
A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people
.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.
2007
;
62
(
7
):
738
-
743
.

23.

Myers
V
,
Drory
Y
,
Gerber
Y
;
Israel Study Group on First Acute Myocardial Infarction
.
Clinical relevance of frailty trajectory post myocardial infarction
.
Eur J Prev Cardiol.
2014
;
21
(
6
):
758
-
766
.

24.

Lüdecke
D
.
sjstats: Statistical Functions for Regression Models
(Version 0.18.0).
2020
. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1284472, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjstats.

25.

Rockwood
MR
,
MacDonald
E
,
Sutton
E
,
Rockwood
K
,
Baron
M
;
Canadian Scleroderma Research Group
.
Frailty index to measure health status in people with systemic sclerosis
.
J Rheumatol.
2014
;
41
(
4
):
698
-
705
.

26.

Hubbard
RE
,
Peel
NM
,
Smith
M
, et al.
Feasibility and construct validity of a Frailty index for patients with chronic kidney disease
.
Australas J Ageing.
2015
;
34
(
3
):
E9
-
12
.

27.

Guaraldi
G
,
Brothers
TD
,
Zona
S
, et al.
A frailty index predicts survival and incident multimorbidity independent of markers of HIV disease severity
.
Aids.
2015
;
29
(
13
):
1633
-
1641
.

28.

Varadhan
R
,
Walston
J
,
Cappola
AR
,
Carlson
MC
,
Wand
GS
,
Fried
LP
.
Higher levels and blunted diurnal variation of cortisol in frail older women
.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.
2008
;
63
(
2
):
190
-
195
.

29.

Carvalhaes-Neto
N
,
Huayllas
MK
,
Ramos
LR
,
Cendoroglo
MS
,
Kater
CE
.
Cortisol, DHEAS and aging: resistance to cortisol suppression in frail institutionalized elderly
.
J Endocrinol Invest.
2003
;
26
(
1
):
17
-
22
.

30.

Holanda
CM
,
Guerra
RO
,
Nóbrega
PV
,
Costa
HF
,
Piuvezam
MR
,
Maciel
ÁC
.
Salivary cortisol and frailty syndrome in elderly residents of long-stay institutions: a cross-sectional study
.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr.
2012
;
54
(
2
):
e146
-
e151
.

31.

Blodgett
JM
,
Theou
O
,
Howlett
SE
,
Rockwood
K
.
A frailty index from common clinical and laboratory tests predicts increased risk of death across the life course
.
Geroscience.
2017
;
39
(
4
):
447
-
455
.

32.

Ravindrarajah
R
,
Lee
DM
,
Pye
SR
, et al. ;
European Male Aging Study Group
.
The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality: results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS)
.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr.
2013
;
57
(
3
):
360
-
368
.

33.

Delivanis
DA
,
Iñiguez-Ariza
NM
,
Zeb
MH
, et al.
Impact of hypercortisolism on skeletal muscle mass and adipose tissue mass in patients with adrenal adenomas
.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf).
2018
;
88
(
2
):
209
-
216
.

34.

Oh
J
,
Choi
CK
,
Kim
SA
, et al.
Association of falls and fear of falling with mortality in Korean adults: the Dong-gu Study
.
Chonnam Med J.
2019
;
55
(
2
):
104
-
108
.

35.

Berry
SD
,
Miller
RR
.
Falls: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and relationship to fracture
.
Curr Osteoporos Rep.
2008
;
6
(
4
):
149
-
154
.

36.

Tinetti
ME
,
Williams
CS
.
The effect of falls and fall injuries on functioning in community-dwelling older persons
.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.
1998
;
53
(
2
):
M112
-
M119
.

37.

Di Dalmazi
G
,
Vicennati
V
,
Pizzi
C
, et al.
Prevalence and incidence of atrial fibrillation in a large cohort of adrenal incidentalomas: a long-term study
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2020
;
105
(
8
):dgaa270. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa270

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)