- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Pascale Chavassieux, Response to the Letter by Scillitani, et al, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Volume 101, Issue 2, 1 February 2016, Page L19, https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4341
- Share Icon Share
We thank the authors for their comments and the discussion of their previous results (1). This confirms that regardless of the technique used for assessing the bone turnover at different skeletal sites, regional variations of bone turnover are reported (2). This explained the relative weakness of the correlations between bone markers that reflect the whole skeleton and histomorphometric parameters measured on a small area of iliac crest (3).
Disclosure Summary: The author has nothing to disclose.