1-20 of 4545
Sort by
Journal Article
Luca Serafini and others
Industrial and Corporate Change, dtaf010, https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf010
Published: 23 April 2025
Image
Published: 23 April 2025
Figure 2. Event study: impact of ERDF projects on firms’ VA by different estimators. Note : Unbalanced estimation. Simultaneous 95% confidence bands—clustering at the firm level.
Image
Published: 23 April 2025
Figure 4. Event study: impact of ERDF projects on firms’ VA—by macro-area. Note : DR estimator. Unbalanced estimation. Simultaneous 95% confidence bands—clustering at the firm level.
Image
Published: 23 April 2025
Figure 6. Event study: impact of ERDF projects on firms’ VA—by project type. Note : OR estimator. Unbalanced estimation. Simultaneous 95% confidence bands—clustering at the firm level.
Image
Published: 23 April 2025
Figure 1. Number of firms by max payment ratio.
Image
Published: 23 April 2025
Figure 3. Event study: impact of ERDF projects on firms’ VA, employment, and labor productivity. Note : DR estimator. Unbalanced estimation. Simultaneous 95% confidence bands—clustering at the firm level.
Image
Published: 23 April 2025
Figure 5. Event study: impact of ERDF projects on firms’ VA—by macro-sector. Note : DR estimator. Unbalanced estimation. Simultaneous 95% confidence bands—clustering at the firm level.
Journal Article
Industrial and Corporate Change, dtaf009, https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf009
Published: 17 April 2025
Journal Article
Filippo Berti Mecocci and Amir Maghssudipour
Industrial and Corporate Change, dtaf006, https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf006
Published: 14 March 2025
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure 1. CERN activity codes and the content of patents.
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure 2. Estimates of the hazard ratio for LHC suppliers. Notes: Estimates of the hazard ratio (HR) associated with models in Table 1 and 90% confidence interval.
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure B1. Word clouds based on the title of patents for the four most frequent CERN activity codes. Notes: the figure shows the most recurring words in patents’ titles for the top-four most frequent CERN activity codes. The font size is proportional to the number of times the word is found in the title of
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure 3. The average marginal effect of interaction terms presented in column (9) of Table 1 on the pairs of NUTS 2 manufacturing NACE-3 TFP. Source : Authors’ elaboration on Amadeus-Bureau Van Dijk and Eurostat data.
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure 4. The average marginal effect of interaction terms presented in column (9) of Table 2 on the pairs of NUTS 2 manufacturing NACE-3 TFP. Source : Authors’ elaboration on Amadeus-Bureau Van Dijk and Eurostat Data.
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure A1. Spatial distribution of manufacturing regional TFP residuals. Notes . The map illustrates the levels of among the countries included in this study. is calculated as , which is described in detail in Section 3 . However, to represent this variable on a map, it was necessary to reduce its
Journal Article
Andrea Bastianin and others
Industrial and Corporate Change, dtaf004, https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf004
Published: 14 March 2025
Journal Article
Abel Lucena and others
Industrial and Corporate Change, dtaf007, https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf007
Published: 14 March 2025
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure 1. Change in manufacturing productivity (2000–2020) according to different levels of initial median age (panel A); median age in NUTS-2 regions (panel B). Notes . The sample includes Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, France, Portugal, Sweden, and Finland as in the econometric approach proposed in the fo
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the proposed mechanisms. Notes . This is a stylized representation of the main mechanisms described in Section 2.3 . Arrows indicate the direction of the relationship. Blue words indicate key working channels. Source : Authors’ elaboration.
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure 3. Estimated survival function. Notes: Unconditional survival rates for firms in the treated (treated = 1) and control group (treated = 0).