Abstract

There is an obvious clinical–pathological overlap between essential tremor and some known tremor-associated short tandem repeat expansion disorders. The aim is to analyse whether these short tandem repeat genes, including ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, CACNA1A, ATXN7, ATXN8OS, ATXN10, PPP2R2B, TBP, BEAN1, NOP56, DAB1, ATN1, SADM12 and FMR1, are associated with familial essential tremor patients. Genetic analysis of repeat sizes in tremor-associated short tandem repeat expansions was performed in a large cohort of 515 familial essential tremor probands and 300 controls. The demographic and clinical features among carriers of pathogenic expansions, intermediate repeats and non-carriers were compared. A total of 18 out of 515 (18/515, 3.7%) patients were found to have repeats expansions, including 12 cases (12/515, 2.5%) with intermediate repeat expansions (one ATXN1, eight TBP, two FMR1, one ATN1), and six cases (6/515, 1.2%) with pathogenic expansions (one ATXN1, one ATXN2, one ATXN8OS, one PPP2R2B, one FMR1, one SAMD12). There were no statistically significant differences in intermediate repeats compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in demographics and clinical features among individuals with pathogenic expansions, intermediate repeat expansions carriers and non-carriers. Our study indicates that the intermediate repeat expansion in tremor-associated short tandem repeat expansions does not pose an increased risk for essential tremor, and rare pathogenic expansion carriers have been found in the familial essential tremor cohort. The diagnosis of essential tremor based solely on clinical symptoms remains a challenge in distinguishing it from known short tandem repeat expansions diseases with overlapping clinical–pathological features.

Introduction

Short tandem repeats (STRs) are abundant nucleotide repeat sequences dispersed throughout the human genome, typically consisting of 2–6 nucleotides in length that are repeated consecutively.1,2 These repetitive sequences are prone to variations in the number of repeats during DNA replication. Expanded STRs can result in pathogenic effects, and more than 50 disorders are known to be associated with expanded STR loci. These STRs are generally categorized based on their repeat lengths into three groups: normal, intermediate (characterized by a repeat size below the pathogenic length but exhibiting genetic instability, with the potential for expansion in further generations), premutation [with 55–200 GGC repeats of FMR1 gene, carrying an increased risk for fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS)] and pathogenic expansions. Tremors are observed in nearly one-third of these disorders, with many involving cerebellar changes, including spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA), FXTAS and familial cortical myoclonic tremor and epilepsy (FCMTE), NOTCH2NLC related repeat expansion disorders and GIPC1 related movement disorders.3-6

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common tremor disorders, characterized by a 4–12 Hz action tremor primarily affecting the upper limbs, usually occurring during various voluntary movements.7,8 The tremors may also extend to the lower limbs, head, voice, lip and other body regions. Recent clinical and pathological investigations have increasingly supported the notion of cerebellar involvement in ET. Firstly, ∼28–40% of ET patients exhibit intention tremors in their arms.9,10 Recent studies have also revealed abnormalities in tandem gait and oculomotor deficits in ET patients11-13,14,15 providing strong indicators of cerebellar dysfunction. Intention tremor is caused by disturbances of the cerebellar outflow projection system mediated by the dentate nucleus and superior cerebellar peduncle.16 Tandem gait and oculomotor impairment represent symptoms of cerebellar regulation of the midline and caudal vermis, respectively.11,17 Secondly, recent structural and functional image studies have shown a correlation of grey matter decreases in cerebellum with ET, and disturb in cerebello-dentato-thalamic connectively in ET.16,18,19 Thirdly, degenerative changes primarily affect the cerebellum in ET, particularly affecting the Purkinje cells (PCs) and adjacent neuronal populations.20,21 Furthermore, genetic anticipation, a characteristic feature of repeat expansion diseases, has been also observed in some ET families.22,23 Therefore, there is an obvious clinical–pathological overlap between ET and these tremor-associated STR expansion disorders.

Prior investigations have reported significant familial aggregation in ET, with twin studies suggesting high heritability (45–90%).24-26 Despite the identification of up to 50 genes/loci, the lack of consistent replication suggests a high degree of genetic heterogeneity.27 Recent studies have revealed an association between ET and repeat expansions in NOTCH2NLC, with ∼5% of familial ET patients carrying pathogenic expansions.5,28 Given the evident overlap in clinical and pathological characteristics between ET and these tremor-associated STR expansion disorders, familial ET patients may also carry these STR expansions.

In this study, we investigated a cohort of 515 familial ET cases and 300 healthy controls with tremor-associated STR genes: ATXN1 (SCA1), ATXN2 (SCA2), ATXN3 (SCA3), CACNA1A (SCA6), ATXN7 (SCA7), ATXN8OS (SCA8), ATXN10 (SCA10), PPP2R2B (SCA12), TBP (SCA17), BEAN1 (SCA31), NOP56 (SCA36), DAB1 (SCA37), ATN1 (DRPLA), SADM12 (FAME1) and FMR1 (FXS/FXTAS), to determine whether familial ET are associated with these genes expansions, and assess the impact of expansions on these patients.

Methods

Subjects

We conducted a retrospective review of medical records and clinical assessment data of ET patients recruited between 2013 and 2022 at the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. A total of 515 probands with ET, with a mean age of 53.8 ± 16.1 and 45.6% males, meeting the guidelines of the Consensus Statement of the Movement Disorders Society (2018),29 underwent successful screening for the tremor-associated STR genes. In our previous study, we screened for NOTCH2NLC and GIPC1 GGC repeat expansions in this cohort, identifying 27 (5.2%) probands with NOTCH2NLC repeat expansions and 3 (0.6%) probands with GIPC1 repeat expansions28,30 (Fig. 1A).

The screening results of tremor-associated STRs. (A) The frequencies of known tremor-associated STRs expansions in 515 familial ET probands. (B) Results of known STRs size detection in 515 familial ET probands [BEAN1 (SCA31), DAB1 (SCA37) and SAMD12 (FCMTE1) are not shown since the disease is caused by alternative pathogenic repeat insertions]. STRs, short tandem repeats; SCA, spinocerebellar ataxia; DRPLA, Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy; FXTAS, fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome; FMCTE, familial cortical myoclonic tremor and epilepsy.
Figure 1

The screening results of tremor-associated STRs. (A) The frequencies of known tremor-associated STRs expansions in 515 familial ET probands. (B) Results of known STRs size detection in 515 familial ET probands [BEAN1 (SCA31), DAB1 (SCA37) and SAMD12 (FCMTE1) are not shown since the disease is caused by alternative pathogenic repeat insertions]. STRs, short tandem repeats; SCA, spinocerebellar ataxia; DRPLA, Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy; FXTAS, fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome; FMCTE, familial cortical myoclonic tremor and epilepsy.

Comprehensive clinical assessments were conducted, including the collection of family history, demographic characteristics, clinical data and neurological examination. The severity of ET was evaluated using the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS). Non-motor symptoms were assessed using the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS), cognitive function was evaluated with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and cognitive impairment was defined based on the following criteria: illiterate (≤17), elementary education (20) and middle school or higher education (≤24). Dystonia was assessed using the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale, and a score ≥ 1 was defined as questionable dystonia posturing. Tandem gait (10 steps) was evaluated by straight line walk, and at least two missteps out of 10-step trials were defined as impaired tandem gait.

A control group comprising 300 individuals without any neurological diseases was recruited from the medical examination of Xiangya Hospital, matched on age, gender and ethnicity (Mongolian).31 After obtaining written informed consent, peripheral blood samples were collected from all participants. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood via a standardized phenol-chloroform method. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.

Genotyping for tremor-associated STRs

The repeats genotyping of tremor-associated STRs were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using fluorescently labelled primers respectively (primers and PCR conditions are available upon request), followed by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI3730xl genetic analyser. Data were analysed using GeneMarker software v2.6, and allele sizes were defined based on comparison with the molecular weight standard Gene Scan GS550 (Applied Biosystems, Inc.). The range threshold of expanded repeats in tremor-associated STRs is provided in Supplementary Table 1.

Statistical analysis

The chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the frequency of repeat lengths between cases and controls. To analyse the influence of expanded STRs on the clinical features, Mann–Whitney U test was performed on continuous variables between two groups comparison, and Kruskal–Wallis test was used in three groups. The Bonferroni test was used in multiple-comparison correction. The statistical analysis was performed by SPSS (version 26.0) and R Statistical Software (version 4.2.2, R package ggplot, geom_bar and geom_jitter).

Results

Frequencies of intermediate and pathologic STR expansions in ET

We successfully screened the repeats of tremor-associated STRs in 515 probands with ET and 300 control individuals. Within the cohort of 515 familial ET probands, we identified repeat expansions in 18 cases (18/515, 3.5%). Of these, 12 cases (12/515, 2.3%) displayed intermediate repeats (one ATXN1, eight TBP, two FMR1 and one ATN1), and six cases (6/515, 1.2%) exhibited pathogenic (premutation) expansions (one ATXN1, one ATXN2, one ATXN8OS, one PPP2R2B, one FMR1 and one SAMD12) (Fig. 1A). Among the 300 healthy controls, intermediate repeats were observed in four individuals (1.3%) (three SCA17 and one FMR1).31 Notably, no significant differences in the frequency of intermediate or pathogenic repeats were observed between ET probands and controls (Table 1). Furthermore, all expanded repeat alleles detected in individuals with ET and healthy controls were found to be heterozygotes. The sizes of STRs detected by PCR are illustrated in Fig. 1B.

Table 1

Genotyping results for repeat alleles in tremor-associated STRs in ET group and healthy controls

Normal allelesIntermediate allelesPathogenic allelesNormal allelesIntermediate allelesPathogenic allelesP value (intermediate alleles)P value (pathogenic alleles)
ATXN1 (SCA1)96811600001.0001.000
ATXN2 (SCA2)96901600001.000
ATXN3 (SCA3)9700060000
CACNA1A (SCA6)9700060000
ATXN7 (SCA7)9700060000
ATXN8OS (SCA8)96901600001.000
ATXN10 (SCA10)9700060000
PPP2R2B (SCA12)96901600001.000
TBP (SCA17)97080597300.671
BEAN1 (SCA31)9700060000
NOP56 (SCA36)9700060000
DAB1 (SCA37)9700060000
ATN1 (DRPLA)96910600001.000
FMR1 (FXTAS)96721a599101.0001.000
SAMD12 (FCMTE)96901600001.000
Normal allelesIntermediate allelesPathogenic allelesNormal allelesIntermediate allelesPathogenic allelesP value (intermediate alleles)P value (pathogenic alleles)
ATXN1 (SCA1)96811600001.0001.000
ATXN2 (SCA2)96901600001.000
ATXN3 (SCA3)9700060000
CACNA1A (SCA6)9700060000
ATXN7 (SCA7)9700060000
ATXN8OS (SCA8)96901600001.000
ATXN10 (SCA10)9700060000
PPP2R2B (SCA12)96901600001.000
TBP (SCA17)97080597300.671
BEAN1 (SCA31)9700060000
NOP56 (SCA36)9700060000
DAB1 (SCA37)9700060000
ATN1 (DRPLA)96910600001.000
FMR1 (FXTAS)96721a599101.0001.000
SAMD12 (FCMTE)96901600001.000

aPremutation alleles.

Table 1

Genotyping results for repeat alleles in tremor-associated STRs in ET group and healthy controls

Normal allelesIntermediate allelesPathogenic allelesNormal allelesIntermediate allelesPathogenic allelesP value (intermediate alleles)P value (pathogenic alleles)
ATXN1 (SCA1)96811600001.0001.000
ATXN2 (SCA2)96901600001.000
ATXN3 (SCA3)9700060000
CACNA1A (SCA6)9700060000
ATXN7 (SCA7)9700060000
ATXN8OS (SCA8)96901600001.000
ATXN10 (SCA10)9700060000
PPP2R2B (SCA12)96901600001.000
TBP (SCA17)97080597300.671
BEAN1 (SCA31)9700060000
NOP56 (SCA36)9700060000
DAB1 (SCA37)9700060000
ATN1 (DRPLA)96910600001.000
FMR1 (FXTAS)96721a599101.0001.000
SAMD12 (FCMTE)96901600001.000
Normal allelesIntermediate allelesPathogenic allelesNormal allelesIntermediate allelesPathogenic allelesP value (intermediate alleles)P value (pathogenic alleles)
ATXN1 (SCA1)96811600001.0001.000
ATXN2 (SCA2)96901600001.000
ATXN3 (SCA3)9700060000
CACNA1A (SCA6)9700060000
ATXN7 (SCA7)9700060000
ATXN8OS (SCA8)96901600001.000
ATXN10 (SCA10)9700060000
PPP2R2B (SCA12)96901600001.000
TBP (SCA17)97080597300.671
BEAN1 (SCA31)9700060000
NOP56 (SCA36)9700060000
DAB1 (SCA37)9700060000
ATN1 (DRPLA)96910600001.000
FMR1 (FXTAS)96721a599101.0001.000
SAMD12 (FCMTE)96901600001.000

aPremutation alleles.

Clinical features of patients with expansions

The mean ages at onset were 36.0, 47.3 and 41.6 for individuals with pathogenic expansions, intermediate repeat expansions and non-carriers, respectively. While patients with pathogenic expansions had the earliest age at onset, no significant differences were observed among the three groups, and there were no significant correlations between the sizes of these STRs and age at onset (Supplementary Fig. 1). Notably, there were also no significant differences in the distribution, type or severity of tremors, non-motor symptoms or the presence of ET-plus across the three groups (Table 2). We further conducted a comparative analysis, contrasting carriers of SCAs expansions (10 cases with intermediate expansion and 4 with pathogenic expansion) and FMR1 expansions (2 cases with intermediate expansion and 1 with pathogenic expansion) with non-carriers. SAMD12 expansion was excluded from statistical analysis due to a limited number of cases. The comparison did not reveal any significant differences between expansion carriers and non-carriers of the respective expansions (Supplementary Table 2).

Table 2

Demographic and clinical features in carriers of pathogenic repeats, intermediate alleles and non-carriers

Carriers of pathogenic expansions, n = 6Carriers of IAs, n = 12Non-carriers, n = 467P (all)Adj. P (pathogenic repeats versus IAs)Adj. P (pathogenic repeats versus non-carriers)Adj. P (IAs versus non-carriers)
Sex, male, n (%)3 (50.0)7 (58.3)254 (54.4)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Age, years, mean (SD)51.0 (10.1)56.0 (17.3)53.8 (16.1)0.6430.2500.4540.592
Duration (SD)16.2 (15.2)9.2 (4.9)11.9 (9.6)0.7110.5210.6320.497
Education, years, mean (SD)10.6 (2.9)13.0 (5.2)10.2 (4.0)0.3830.2840.9530.167
Head tremor, n (%)2 (33.3)2 (16.7)153 (32.8)0.5100.5691.0000.387
Face tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)2 (16.7)122 (26.1)0.8291.0001.0000.686
Voice tremor, n (%)3 (50.0)2 (16.7)131 (28.1)0.3680.2680.3600.577
Upper limbs tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)467 (100.0)1.000NANANA
Lower limbs tremor, n (%)3 (50.0)3 (25.0)134 (28.7)0.4850.3440.3631.000
Postural tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)467 (97.9)NANANANA
Kinetic tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)453 (97.0)1.000NA1.0001.000
Intention tremor, n (%)4 (66.7)5 (41.7)178 (38.1)0.3630.6200.2101.000
TETRAS-I (SD)16.3 (11.4)9.6 (7.4)13.4 (9.7)0.4490.2280.4810.297
TETRAS-II (SD)19.0 (9.7)18.0 (5.3)17.4 (7.8)0.8720.5730.6600.776
MMSE (SD)27.7 (2.1)28.8 (1.2)27.7 (2.8)0.5920.3100.6350.372
NMSS (SD)5.2 (5.3)8.3 (9.9)12.1 (15.5)0.5340.8180.3450.533
ET-plus, n (%)1 (16.7)5 (41.7)234 (50.1)0.4810.6000.2160.564
Dystonia, n (%)0 (0.0)1 (8.3)37 (7.9)1.0001.0001.0001.000
MCI, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (16.7)107 (22.9)0.5360.5290.3450.872
Tandem repeat, n (%)0 (0.0)1 (8.3)54 (11.6)1.0001.0000.8111.000
Rest tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)1 (8.3)57 (12.2)0.8401.0001.0001.000
Carriers of pathogenic expansions, n = 6Carriers of IAs, n = 12Non-carriers, n = 467P (all)Adj. P (pathogenic repeats versus IAs)Adj. P (pathogenic repeats versus non-carriers)Adj. P (IAs versus non-carriers)
Sex, male, n (%)3 (50.0)7 (58.3)254 (54.4)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Age, years, mean (SD)51.0 (10.1)56.0 (17.3)53.8 (16.1)0.6430.2500.4540.592
Duration (SD)16.2 (15.2)9.2 (4.9)11.9 (9.6)0.7110.5210.6320.497
Education, years, mean (SD)10.6 (2.9)13.0 (5.2)10.2 (4.0)0.3830.2840.9530.167
Head tremor, n (%)2 (33.3)2 (16.7)153 (32.8)0.5100.5691.0000.387
Face tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)2 (16.7)122 (26.1)0.8291.0001.0000.686
Voice tremor, n (%)3 (50.0)2 (16.7)131 (28.1)0.3680.2680.3600.577
Upper limbs tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)467 (100.0)1.000NANANA
Lower limbs tremor, n (%)3 (50.0)3 (25.0)134 (28.7)0.4850.3440.3631.000
Postural tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)467 (97.9)NANANANA
Kinetic tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)453 (97.0)1.000NA1.0001.000
Intention tremor, n (%)4 (66.7)5 (41.7)178 (38.1)0.3630.6200.2101.000
TETRAS-I (SD)16.3 (11.4)9.6 (7.4)13.4 (9.7)0.4490.2280.4810.297
TETRAS-II (SD)19.0 (9.7)18.0 (5.3)17.4 (7.8)0.8720.5730.6600.776
MMSE (SD)27.7 (2.1)28.8 (1.2)27.7 (2.8)0.5920.3100.6350.372
NMSS (SD)5.2 (5.3)8.3 (9.9)12.1 (15.5)0.5340.8180.3450.533
ET-plus, n (%)1 (16.7)5 (41.7)234 (50.1)0.4810.6000.2160.564
Dystonia, n (%)0 (0.0)1 (8.3)37 (7.9)1.0001.0001.0001.000
MCI, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (16.7)107 (22.9)0.5360.5290.3450.872
Tandem repeat, n (%)0 (0.0)1 (8.3)54 (11.6)1.0001.0000.8111.000
Rest tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)1 (8.3)57 (12.2)0.8401.0001.0001.000

Adj. P = adjusted P (statistically significant cut-off of P < 0.017 by Bonferroni correction).

IA, intermediate allele; SD, standard deviation; ET, essential tremor; TETRAS, Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; NMSS, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NA, data not available.

Table 2

Demographic and clinical features in carriers of pathogenic repeats, intermediate alleles and non-carriers

Carriers of pathogenic expansions, n = 6Carriers of IAs, n = 12Non-carriers, n = 467P (all)Adj. P (pathogenic repeats versus IAs)Adj. P (pathogenic repeats versus non-carriers)Adj. P (IAs versus non-carriers)
Sex, male, n (%)3 (50.0)7 (58.3)254 (54.4)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Age, years, mean (SD)51.0 (10.1)56.0 (17.3)53.8 (16.1)0.6430.2500.4540.592
Duration (SD)16.2 (15.2)9.2 (4.9)11.9 (9.6)0.7110.5210.6320.497
Education, years, mean (SD)10.6 (2.9)13.0 (5.2)10.2 (4.0)0.3830.2840.9530.167
Head tremor, n (%)2 (33.3)2 (16.7)153 (32.8)0.5100.5691.0000.387
Face tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)2 (16.7)122 (26.1)0.8291.0001.0000.686
Voice tremor, n (%)3 (50.0)2 (16.7)131 (28.1)0.3680.2680.3600.577
Upper limbs tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)467 (100.0)1.000NANANA
Lower limbs tremor, n (%)3 (50.0)3 (25.0)134 (28.7)0.4850.3440.3631.000
Postural tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)467 (97.9)NANANANA
Kinetic tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)453 (97.0)1.000NA1.0001.000
Intention tremor, n (%)4 (66.7)5 (41.7)178 (38.1)0.3630.6200.2101.000
TETRAS-I (SD)16.3 (11.4)9.6 (7.4)13.4 (9.7)0.4490.2280.4810.297
TETRAS-II (SD)19.0 (9.7)18.0 (5.3)17.4 (7.8)0.8720.5730.6600.776
MMSE (SD)27.7 (2.1)28.8 (1.2)27.7 (2.8)0.5920.3100.6350.372
NMSS (SD)5.2 (5.3)8.3 (9.9)12.1 (15.5)0.5340.8180.3450.533
ET-plus, n (%)1 (16.7)5 (41.7)234 (50.1)0.4810.6000.2160.564
Dystonia, n (%)0 (0.0)1 (8.3)37 (7.9)1.0001.0001.0001.000
MCI, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (16.7)107 (22.9)0.5360.5290.3450.872
Tandem repeat, n (%)0 (0.0)1 (8.3)54 (11.6)1.0001.0000.8111.000
Rest tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)1 (8.3)57 (12.2)0.8401.0001.0001.000
Carriers of pathogenic expansions, n = 6Carriers of IAs, n = 12Non-carriers, n = 467P (all)Adj. P (pathogenic repeats versus IAs)Adj. P (pathogenic repeats versus non-carriers)Adj. P (IAs versus non-carriers)
Sex, male, n (%)3 (50.0)7 (58.3)254 (54.4)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Age, years, mean (SD)51.0 (10.1)56.0 (17.3)53.8 (16.1)0.6430.2500.4540.592
Duration (SD)16.2 (15.2)9.2 (4.9)11.9 (9.6)0.7110.5210.6320.497
Education, years, mean (SD)10.6 (2.9)13.0 (5.2)10.2 (4.0)0.3830.2840.9530.167
Head tremor, n (%)2 (33.3)2 (16.7)153 (32.8)0.5100.5691.0000.387
Face tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)2 (16.7)122 (26.1)0.8291.0001.0000.686
Voice tremor, n (%)3 (50.0)2 (16.7)131 (28.1)0.3680.2680.3600.577
Upper limbs tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)467 (100.0)1.000NANANA
Lower limbs tremor, n (%)3 (50.0)3 (25.0)134 (28.7)0.4850.3440.3631.000
Postural tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)467 (97.9)NANANANA
Kinetic tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)12 (100.0)453 (97.0)1.000NA1.0001.000
Intention tremor, n (%)4 (66.7)5 (41.7)178 (38.1)0.3630.6200.2101.000
TETRAS-I (SD)16.3 (11.4)9.6 (7.4)13.4 (9.7)0.4490.2280.4810.297
TETRAS-II (SD)19.0 (9.7)18.0 (5.3)17.4 (7.8)0.8720.5730.6600.776
MMSE (SD)27.7 (2.1)28.8 (1.2)27.7 (2.8)0.5920.3100.6350.372
NMSS (SD)5.2 (5.3)8.3 (9.9)12.1 (15.5)0.5340.8180.3450.533
ET-plus, n (%)1 (16.7)5 (41.7)234 (50.1)0.4810.6000.2160.564
Dystonia, n (%)0 (0.0)1 (8.3)37 (7.9)1.0001.0001.0001.000
MCI, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (16.7)107 (22.9)0.5360.5290.3450.872
Tandem repeat, n (%)0 (0.0)1 (8.3)54 (11.6)1.0001.0000.8111.000
Rest tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)1 (8.3)57 (12.2)0.8401.0001.0001.000

Adj. P = adjusted P (statistically significant cut-off of P < 0.017 by Bonferroni correction).

IA, intermediate allele; SD, standard deviation; ET, essential tremor; TETRAS, Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; NMSS, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NA, data not available.

Our previous investigations have identified 27 familial ET patients with NOTCH2NLC pathogenic expansions and 3 with GIPC1 pathogenic expansions, all lacking intermediate repeats in the two genes.6,28 Herein, we compared carriers of tremor-associated pathogenic expansions with those of NOTCH2NLC and GIPC1 expansions. Significant differences were observed in TETRAS-I and NMSS scores, as well as the prevalence of ET-plus among the three groups (P < 0.05) (Table 3). Further pairwise comparisons revealed that carriers of NOTCH2NLC pathogenic expansions had significantly higher NMSS scores compared to tremor-associated pathogenic expansion carriers (adj. P < 0.017) (Table 3).

Table 3

Demographic and clinical features in carriers of pathogenic repeats, NOTCH2NLC and GIPC1 pathogenic expansions

Tremor-associated carriers, n = 6NOTCH2NLC carriers, n = 27GIPC1 carriers, n = 3P (All)Adj. P (tremor-associated versus NOTCH2NLC)Adj. P (tremor-associated versus GIPC1)Adj. P (NOTCH2NLC versus GIPC1)
Sex, male, n (%)3 (50.0)10 (37.0)2 (66.7)0.6140.6591.0000.548
Age, years, mean (SD)51.0 (10.1)54.0 (14.5)45.7 (28.0)0.6740.4510.9050.647
Age at onset, years, mean (SD)34.8 (19.1)41.6 (13.7)44.3 (19.5)0.7890.5380.7140.845
Duration (SD)16.2 (15.2)12.4 (8.8)7.7 (4.2)0.6030.9820.5480.315
Education, years, mean (SD)10.6 (2.9)10.3 (4.0)9.0 (1.0)0.7120.9600.5710.467
Head, n (%)2 (33.3)10 (27.0)1 (33.3)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Face, n (%)1 (16.7)13 (48.1)0 (0.0)0.1680.2091.0000.238
Voice, n (%)3 (50.0)10 (37.0)0 (0.0)0.4370.6590.4640.532
Upper limbs, n (%)6 (100.0)27 (100.0)3 (100.0)NANANANA
Lower limbs, n (%)3 (50.0)12 (48.1)0 (0.0)0.4391.0000.4640.238
Postural tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)27 (100.0)3 (100.0)NANANANA
Kinetic tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)24 (88.9)3 (100.0)NA1.000NA1.000
Intention tremor, n (%)4 (66.7)14 (51.9)3 (100.0)0.2710.6650.5000.238
TETRAS-I (SD)16.3 (11.4)27.1 (11.9)9.3 (7.2)0.0370.1090.3930.026
TETRAS-II (SD)19.0 (9.7)29.3 (12.0)13.0 (7.2)0.0600.1220.3930.061
MMSE (SD)27.7 (2.1)25.7 (3.0)21.3 (10.7)0.3980.2010.3931.000
NMSS (SD)5.2 (5.3)23.4 (19.9)10.0 (2.6)0.0030.0010.2620.072
ET-plus, n (%)1 (16.7)18 (66.7)0 (0.0)0.0130.0621.0000.054
Dystonia, n (%)0 (0.0)4 (14.8)0 (0.0)1.0001.000NA1.000
MCI, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (7.4)3 (0.0)1.0001.000NA1.000
Tandem repeat, n (%)0 (0.0)5 (18.5)0 (0.0)0.7210.556NA1.000
Rest tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)9 (33.3)0 (0.0)0.5550.6401.0000.534
Tremor-associated carriers, n = 6NOTCH2NLC carriers, n = 27GIPC1 carriers, n = 3P (All)Adj. P (tremor-associated versus NOTCH2NLC)Adj. P (tremor-associated versus GIPC1)Adj. P (NOTCH2NLC versus GIPC1)
Sex, male, n (%)3 (50.0)10 (37.0)2 (66.7)0.6140.6591.0000.548
Age, years, mean (SD)51.0 (10.1)54.0 (14.5)45.7 (28.0)0.6740.4510.9050.647
Age at onset, years, mean (SD)34.8 (19.1)41.6 (13.7)44.3 (19.5)0.7890.5380.7140.845
Duration (SD)16.2 (15.2)12.4 (8.8)7.7 (4.2)0.6030.9820.5480.315
Education, years, mean (SD)10.6 (2.9)10.3 (4.0)9.0 (1.0)0.7120.9600.5710.467
Head, n (%)2 (33.3)10 (27.0)1 (33.3)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Face, n (%)1 (16.7)13 (48.1)0 (0.0)0.1680.2091.0000.238
Voice, n (%)3 (50.0)10 (37.0)0 (0.0)0.4370.6590.4640.532
Upper limbs, n (%)6 (100.0)27 (100.0)3 (100.0)NANANANA
Lower limbs, n (%)3 (50.0)12 (48.1)0 (0.0)0.4391.0000.4640.238
Postural tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)27 (100.0)3 (100.0)NANANANA
Kinetic tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)24 (88.9)3 (100.0)NA1.000NA1.000
Intention tremor, n (%)4 (66.7)14 (51.9)3 (100.0)0.2710.6650.5000.238
TETRAS-I (SD)16.3 (11.4)27.1 (11.9)9.3 (7.2)0.0370.1090.3930.026
TETRAS-II (SD)19.0 (9.7)29.3 (12.0)13.0 (7.2)0.0600.1220.3930.061
MMSE (SD)27.7 (2.1)25.7 (3.0)21.3 (10.7)0.3980.2010.3931.000
NMSS (SD)5.2 (5.3)23.4 (19.9)10.0 (2.6)0.0030.0010.2620.072
ET-plus, n (%)1 (16.7)18 (66.7)0 (0.0)0.0130.0621.0000.054
Dystonia, n (%)0 (0.0)4 (14.8)0 (0.0)1.0001.000NA1.000
MCI, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (7.4)3 (0.0)1.0001.000NA1.000
Tandem repeat, n (%)0 (0.0)5 (18.5)0 (0.0)0.7210.556NA1.000
Rest tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)9 (33.3)0 (0.0)0.5550.6401.0000.534

Adj. P = adjusted P (statistically significant cut-off of P < 0.017 by Bonferroni correction). Bold P value indicates statistical significance.

IA, intermediate allele; SD, standard deviation; ET, essential tremor; TETRAS, Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; NMSS, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NA, data not available.

Table 3

Demographic and clinical features in carriers of pathogenic repeats, NOTCH2NLC and GIPC1 pathogenic expansions

Tremor-associated carriers, n = 6NOTCH2NLC carriers, n = 27GIPC1 carriers, n = 3P (All)Adj. P (tremor-associated versus NOTCH2NLC)Adj. P (tremor-associated versus GIPC1)Adj. P (NOTCH2NLC versus GIPC1)
Sex, male, n (%)3 (50.0)10 (37.0)2 (66.7)0.6140.6591.0000.548
Age, years, mean (SD)51.0 (10.1)54.0 (14.5)45.7 (28.0)0.6740.4510.9050.647
Age at onset, years, mean (SD)34.8 (19.1)41.6 (13.7)44.3 (19.5)0.7890.5380.7140.845
Duration (SD)16.2 (15.2)12.4 (8.8)7.7 (4.2)0.6030.9820.5480.315
Education, years, mean (SD)10.6 (2.9)10.3 (4.0)9.0 (1.0)0.7120.9600.5710.467
Head, n (%)2 (33.3)10 (27.0)1 (33.3)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Face, n (%)1 (16.7)13 (48.1)0 (0.0)0.1680.2091.0000.238
Voice, n (%)3 (50.0)10 (37.0)0 (0.0)0.4370.6590.4640.532
Upper limbs, n (%)6 (100.0)27 (100.0)3 (100.0)NANANANA
Lower limbs, n (%)3 (50.0)12 (48.1)0 (0.0)0.4391.0000.4640.238
Postural tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)27 (100.0)3 (100.0)NANANANA
Kinetic tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)24 (88.9)3 (100.0)NA1.000NA1.000
Intention tremor, n (%)4 (66.7)14 (51.9)3 (100.0)0.2710.6650.5000.238
TETRAS-I (SD)16.3 (11.4)27.1 (11.9)9.3 (7.2)0.0370.1090.3930.026
TETRAS-II (SD)19.0 (9.7)29.3 (12.0)13.0 (7.2)0.0600.1220.3930.061
MMSE (SD)27.7 (2.1)25.7 (3.0)21.3 (10.7)0.3980.2010.3931.000
NMSS (SD)5.2 (5.3)23.4 (19.9)10.0 (2.6)0.0030.0010.2620.072
ET-plus, n (%)1 (16.7)18 (66.7)0 (0.0)0.0130.0621.0000.054
Dystonia, n (%)0 (0.0)4 (14.8)0 (0.0)1.0001.000NA1.000
MCI, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (7.4)3 (0.0)1.0001.000NA1.000
Tandem repeat, n (%)0 (0.0)5 (18.5)0 (0.0)0.7210.556NA1.000
Rest tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)9 (33.3)0 (0.0)0.5550.6401.0000.534
Tremor-associated carriers, n = 6NOTCH2NLC carriers, n = 27GIPC1 carriers, n = 3P (All)Adj. P (tremor-associated versus NOTCH2NLC)Adj. P (tremor-associated versus GIPC1)Adj. P (NOTCH2NLC versus GIPC1)
Sex, male, n (%)3 (50.0)10 (37.0)2 (66.7)0.6140.6591.0000.548
Age, years, mean (SD)51.0 (10.1)54.0 (14.5)45.7 (28.0)0.6740.4510.9050.647
Age at onset, years, mean (SD)34.8 (19.1)41.6 (13.7)44.3 (19.5)0.7890.5380.7140.845
Duration (SD)16.2 (15.2)12.4 (8.8)7.7 (4.2)0.6030.9820.5480.315
Education, years, mean (SD)10.6 (2.9)10.3 (4.0)9.0 (1.0)0.7120.9600.5710.467
Head, n (%)2 (33.3)10 (27.0)1 (33.3)1.0001.0001.0001.000
Face, n (%)1 (16.7)13 (48.1)0 (0.0)0.1680.2091.0000.238
Voice, n (%)3 (50.0)10 (37.0)0 (0.0)0.4370.6590.4640.532
Upper limbs, n (%)6 (100.0)27 (100.0)3 (100.0)NANANANA
Lower limbs, n (%)3 (50.0)12 (48.1)0 (0.0)0.4391.0000.4640.238
Postural tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)27 (100.0)3 (100.0)NANANANA
Kinetic tremor, n (%)6 (100.0)24 (88.9)3 (100.0)NA1.000NA1.000
Intention tremor, n (%)4 (66.7)14 (51.9)3 (100.0)0.2710.6650.5000.238
TETRAS-I (SD)16.3 (11.4)27.1 (11.9)9.3 (7.2)0.0370.1090.3930.026
TETRAS-II (SD)19.0 (9.7)29.3 (12.0)13.0 (7.2)0.0600.1220.3930.061
MMSE (SD)27.7 (2.1)25.7 (3.0)21.3 (10.7)0.3980.2010.3931.000
NMSS (SD)5.2 (5.3)23.4 (19.9)10.0 (2.6)0.0030.0010.2620.072
ET-plus, n (%)1 (16.7)18 (66.7)0 (0.0)0.0130.0621.0000.054
Dystonia, n (%)0 (0.0)4 (14.8)0 (0.0)1.0001.000NA1.000
MCI, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (7.4)3 (0.0)1.0001.000NA1.000
Tandem repeat, n (%)0 (0.0)5 (18.5)0 (0.0)0.7210.556NA1.000
Rest tremor, n (%)1 (16.7)9 (33.3)0 (0.0)0.5550.6401.0000.534

Adj. P = adjusted P (statistically significant cut-off of P < 0.017 by Bonferroni correction). Bold P value indicates statistical significance.

IA, intermediate allele; SD, standard deviation; ET, essential tremor; TETRAS, Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; NMSS, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NA, data not available.

The phenotype of pathogenic expansion carriers

The main clinical manifestations observed in the six patients with pathogenic expansions were kinetic and postural tremors affecting both upper limbs, with an average score of 16.8 ± 12.7 for TETRAS-I and 19.8 ± 10.6 for TETRAS-II (Tables 2 and 4). None of the four patients carrying SCAs pathogenic expansion showed prominent cerebellar ataxia signs, parkinsonism, pyramidal signs, dystonia or cognitive impairment. None of the six individuals with pathogenic (premutation) expansions responded positively to β-blockers (propranolol or arotinolol) treatment.

Table 4

Clinical features of patients with pathogenic tremor-associated repeat expansions

Patient IDP-1P-2P-3P-4P-5P-6
Pathogenic repeat expansionsATXN1 (43 repeats)ATXN2 (36 repeats)ATXN8OS (188 repeats)PPP2R2B (59 repeats)FMR1 (56 repeats)SAMD12 (105 repeats)
SexMaleMaleMaleFemaleFemaleMale
Age (years)374957536644
Age at onset (years)74617495535
Duration (years)303404119
Education (years)1191161512
Tremor distribution
 Upper limbs++++++
 Head++
 Face+
 Voice+++
 Lower limbs+++
Tremor type
 Kinetic tremor++++++
 Postural tremor++++++
 Rest tremor+
 Intention tremor++++
TETRAS-I1412732915
TETRAS-II155.526.53319.514.5
MMSE282427302829
NMSS1291441
Ataxia/pyramidal signs/parkinsonism/muscle cramps/limb weakness/dysphagia/dysarthria/cognition impairment
Response to β-blockers
MRI cerebellar atrophyMild increase in the width of cerebellar folia and sulci
Patient IDP-1P-2P-3P-4P-5P-6
Pathogenic repeat expansionsATXN1 (43 repeats)ATXN2 (36 repeats)ATXN8OS (188 repeats)PPP2R2B (59 repeats)FMR1 (56 repeats)SAMD12 (105 repeats)
SexMaleMaleMaleFemaleFemaleMale
Age (years)374957536644
Age at onset (years)74617495535
Duration (years)303404119
Education (years)1191161512
Tremor distribution
 Upper limbs++++++
 Head++
 Face+
 Voice+++
 Lower limbs+++
Tremor type
 Kinetic tremor++++++
 Postural tremor++++++
 Rest tremor+
 Intention tremor++++
TETRAS-I1412732915
TETRAS-II155.526.53319.514.5
MMSE282427302829
NMSS1291441
Ataxia/pyramidal signs/parkinsonism/muscle cramps/limb weakness/dysphagia/dysarthria/cognition impairment
Response to β-blockers
MRI cerebellar atrophyMild increase in the width of cerebellar folia and sulci

TETRAS, Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; NMSS, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale.

Table 4

Clinical features of patients with pathogenic tremor-associated repeat expansions

Patient IDP-1P-2P-3P-4P-5P-6
Pathogenic repeat expansionsATXN1 (43 repeats)ATXN2 (36 repeats)ATXN8OS (188 repeats)PPP2R2B (59 repeats)FMR1 (56 repeats)SAMD12 (105 repeats)
SexMaleMaleMaleFemaleFemaleMale
Age (years)374957536644
Age at onset (years)74617495535
Duration (years)303404119
Education (years)1191161512
Tremor distribution
 Upper limbs++++++
 Head++
 Face+
 Voice+++
 Lower limbs+++
Tremor type
 Kinetic tremor++++++
 Postural tremor++++++
 Rest tremor+
 Intention tremor++++
TETRAS-I1412732915
TETRAS-II155.526.53319.514.5
MMSE282427302829
NMSS1291441
Ataxia/pyramidal signs/parkinsonism/muscle cramps/limb weakness/dysphagia/dysarthria/cognition impairment
Response to β-blockers
MRI cerebellar atrophyMild increase in the width of cerebellar folia and sulci
Patient IDP-1P-2P-3P-4P-5P-6
Pathogenic repeat expansionsATXN1 (43 repeats)ATXN2 (36 repeats)ATXN8OS (188 repeats)PPP2R2B (59 repeats)FMR1 (56 repeats)SAMD12 (105 repeats)
SexMaleMaleMaleFemaleFemaleMale
Age (years)374957536644
Age at onset (years)74617495535
Duration (years)303404119
Education (years)1191161512
Tremor distribution
 Upper limbs++++++
 Head++
 Face+
 Voice+++
 Lower limbs+++
Tremor type
 Kinetic tremor++++++
 Postural tremor++++++
 Rest tremor+
 Intention tremor++++
TETRAS-I1412732915
TETRAS-II155.526.53319.514.5
MMSE282427302829
NMSS1291441
Ataxia/pyramidal signs/parkinsonism/muscle cramps/limb weakness/dysphagia/dysarthria/cognition impairment
Response to β-blockers
MRI cerebellar atrophyMild increase in the width of cerebellar folia and sulci

TETRAS, Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; NMSS, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale.

Patient P-1 is a 37-year-old male, carrying 43 repeats in the ATXN1 gene, with tremor onset at a very young age. Despite the worsening amplitude and frequency of tremors over time, pyramidal or cerebellar signs were not observed. Patient P-2 is a 49-year-old male, carrying 36 repeats in the ATXN2 gene. While these SCAs expanded carriers did not exhibit significant abnormalities in cerebellar MRI, P-2 displayed a slight enlargement of cerebellar folia and sulci (Fig. 2A). Patient P-3 is a 57-year-old female, carrying 188 repeats in the ATXN8OS gene. Tremors involve the voice and upper limbs, and mild tremor was observed in the lower limbs. Cognitive impairment was not found in this patient. Patient P-4 is a 53-year-old female, carrying 59 repeats in the PPP2R2B gene. The tremor spread beyond the upper extremities, leading to severe tremors affecting the head, voice, face and lower limbs during the first year of disease duration.

MRI and electropherograms of pathogenic expansion carriers. (A) The brain MRI of patients carried six patients with pathological expansions. (B) Electropherograms of patients with repeat expansions of tremor-associated STRs. STRs, short tandem repeats.
Figure 2

MRI and electropherograms of pathogenic expansion carriers. (A) The brain MRI of patients carried six patients with pathological expansions. (B) Electropherograms of patients with repeat expansions of tremor-associated STRs. STRs, short tandem repeats.

Patient P-5 is a 66-year-old female, carrying 56 GGC repeats in the FMR1 gene and has been experiencing upper limb tremors for eleven years with no signs of ataxia, cognitive impairment or autonomic dysfunction. Brain MRI did not reveal any notable atrophy or white matter disease.

Patient P-6 is a 44-year-old female, carrying an insertion of 105 TTTCA repeats in the SAMD12 gene (Fig. 2B). The brain MRI did not reveal any apparent abnormalities. Notably, electromyography displayed short irregular bursts indicative of a cortical origin, which is a typical feature in FCMTE. Although the proband has never experienced seizures, his mother had two episodes of epileptic seizures during her youth.

Discussion

In this study, we performed analyses of repeat expansion size in tremor-associated STRs in a large familial ET cohort. In this study, we identified 12 (2.5%) patients carrying intermediate repeat expansions and 6 (1.2%) with pathogenic expansions. Our findings suggest that patients primarily diagnosed with ET may carry pathogenic expansions in known tremor-associated STRs. Of interest is whether these repeat expansions display pleiotropy, or if they have been misdiagnosed.

Intermediate STR expansions typically do not directly cause the disease associated with a pathogenic expansion at the locus. However, they can contribute to or increase the risk of developing related diseases and phenotypes. For instance, both ATXN1 and ATXN2 intermediate expansions are associated with an increased risk of developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.32  HTT intermediate expansions give rise to the risk of multisystem atrophy,33 and could confer late-onset abnormal motor and cognitive phenotype.34 Our results suggest that intermediate and pathogenic repeat expansions of these tremor-associated STRs did not increase the risk of familial ET or influence phenotypes of ET patients.

We identified six patients carrying pathogenic expansions, each with a distinct gene involved: ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN8OS, PPP2R2B, FMR1 and SAMD12. The misdiagnosis rate of ET has been reported to range from 37% to 50%.35,36 It is plausible that patients carrying tremor-associated STRs were coincidentally misdiagnosed due to an ET-like phenotype, and they might have developed classic symptoms associated with SCAs, FXTAS or FCMTE if they had lived longer. This highlighted the significance of recognizing the potential overlap and underscores the necessity for follow-up assessments of patients presenting with an ET phenotype. No significant differences were observed in demographics and clinical features between carriers of pathogenic expansions and non-carriers. Notably, previous studies have revealed an association between NOTCH2NLC expansion and ET,5,28 and it exhibited a relatively high prevalence (4.6%) in our familial ET cohort. When compared to patients carrying SCAs, FMR1 and SAMD12 pathogenic expansion, those with GIPC1 expansion did not show significant differences. However, NOTCH2NLC expansions exhibited more severe non-motor symptoms and daily life impairment, and demonstrated a tendency to have a higher prevalence of ET-plus. It seems that patients carrying NOTCH2NLC with more complex symptoms, which may be related to more complex and diffuse central and peripheral neurodegeneration.37 Previous study indicated that a percentage of these patients display symptoms related to neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease during follow-up.28

To gain deeper insights, we meticulously reviewed the medical history and clinical features of each patient with pathogenic expansions, aiming to identify any distinguishing characteristics from those typically observed in ET. Limited literature suggested a prevalence of 0.5% (1/177) ATXN3 in ET.38 However, pathogenic or intermediate expansions were not reported in 10 common degenerative hereditary ataxias among 323 ET patients in the study conducted by Louis et al.,39 and neither Nicoletti et al.40 nor Chen et al. 41 found PPP2R2B in ET patients. Previous studies were limited to a small ET population or lack of consideration of family history. In our study, we observed a prevalence of 0.8% (4/515) for SCAs (ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN8OS and PPP2R2B). These patients with SCA expansions exhibited typical upper limbs tremors, without significant signs of cerebellar dysfunction. SCA1 is characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia, and affected individuals may have gait disturbances and slurred speech at an early stage of disease. Patient P-1 carried 43 repeats of the ATXN1 gene and showed tremors in the upper limbs as the sole symptom for the duration of 30 years without developing ataxia. Previous reports have indicated that alleles with 36–44 CAG repeats interrupted by CATs in the ATXN1 gene are typically non-pathogenic.42,43 The RP-PCR results of P-1 showed an interruption, and the expansion in ATXN1 was probably not the real pathogenic cause in this case. P-2 showed a mild increase in the width of cerebellar folia and sulci in brain MRI, which may indicate early cerebellar changes. P-3 carried 188 repeats of the ATXN8OS gene and suffered tremors for over 40 years but showed no impaired tandem gait or other ataxia signs. SCA8 typically presents as very slowly progressive ataxia, and several unusual non-ataxia phenotypes have been reported, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, seizure-like episodes with migraine, etc.44,45 ET may be also one of the mimic phenotypes of SCA8. The underlying mechanism remains uncovered. Tremor has been reported in SCA1 (5.8%), SCA2 (27.5%), SCA8 (42.9%) and are most common in SCA12 (90%),46,47 and tremor in SCA12 often leading to misdiagnosis as ET.48 We observed prominent tremors of extremities, lip, head and trunk in the second year of the duration of P-4, and tremors progress without sign of ataxia in the fourth year of disease. SCA12 is also a slowly progressive disorder, and it is challenging to determine whether P-4 is ET or exhibiting early symptoms of SCA12 based on the current symptoms, and further follow-up of the patient is necessary for a conclusive diagnosis. The severity of expansion-related diseases is generally correlated with the size of the expansion range. It is noteworthy that except for SCA8, most of the pathogenic genes identified in ET showed a relatively low end of the pathogenic range (Fig. 1), which may lead to patients in our study showing tremors as mild symptoms other than typical symptoms of SCAs.

FCMTE presents with tremor-like cortical myoclonus, which can mimic ET.49,50 The electrophysiologic investigations have provided substantial evidence supporting a cortical origin with giant somatosensory evoked potentials, an enhanced C reflex at rest and pre-myoclonus cortical spikes by jerk locked averaging method (JIA).51 In the case of P-5, the patient predominantly displayed kinetic and postural tremors of upper limbs, with no history of seizures. Notably, the patient's mother reported having experienced two episodes of seizure history. The inclusion of a family history of neurological diseases and the utilization of electrophysiological assessments can provide valuable assistance in the clinical diagnosis of FCMTE.

Patients with FXTAS may initially exhibit action tremor or intention tremor as the sole clinical symptom in the early stages. Previous research has reported a prevalence of grey zone in 0.0–1.5% of ET patients and premutation in 2.7% of patients with presumed ET and additional neurological features.52-54 In our study, we identified ‘grey zone’ repeats in 0.4% (2/515) of ET patients, and identified in a female ET patient with premutation. Patient P-6, a 66-year-old female carried 56 repeats, which falls within the lower range of the premutation threshold. This patient did not show any cognitive impairment, and brain MRI was normal. It has been reported that some patients presented with a predominant phenotype of kinetic tremor without cognitive impairment or specific MRI features of FXTAS, indicating that the possible existence of background genetic modifiers may influence the phenotype.55

Tremors are prevalent in approximately half of the 37 known neurological disorders associated with STR expansions. These tremors tend to emerge early in the course of these disorders, resulting in phenotypic overlap with ET, and other symptoms may occur with disease progression. Therefore, our research highlights the importance of considering these STR mutations in familial ET, and ET patients should undergo long-term follow-up. It seems the patients who carry low-range pathogenic expansions of tremor-associated STRs are more likely to exhibit symptoms resembling those of ET. Additionally, the interrupt motif or genetic modifiers may also contribute to the clinical characteristics.

Conclusions

Our study identified tremor-associated STRs intermediate and pathogenic expansions in a large familial ET cohort. Intermediate repeat expansions of these STRs were not associated with an increased risk for these patients, and rare pathogenic expansion in theses STRs did not significantly impact the general clinical features. Diagnosis of ET based solely on clinical symptoms remains challenging, necessitating long-term follow-ups, auxiliary diagnosis and a detailed survey of family history in familial ET patients.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Brain Communications online.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the pedigree members for their generous participation in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A20355, 82171256, 82202051) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2021JJ31093, 2021JJ40819).

Competing interests

The authors report no competing interests.

Data availability

The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. The data are available upon reasonable request after ethics clearance and approval from the corresponding authors.

References

1

Depienne
 
C
,
Mandel
 
JL
.
30 years of repeat expansion disorders: What have we learned and what are the remaining challenges?
 
Am J Hum Genet.
 
2021
;
108
(
5
):
764
785
.

2

Tankard
 
RM
,
Bennett
 
MF
,
Degorski
 
P
,
Delatycki
 
MB
,
Lockhart
 
PJ
,
Bahlo
 
M
.
Detecting expansions of tandem repeats in cohorts sequenced with short-read sequencing data
.
Am J Hum Genet.
 
2018
;
103
(
6
):
858
873
.

3

Coarelli
 
G
,
Wirth
 
T
,
Tranchant
 
C
,
Koenig
 
M
,
Durr
 
A
,
Anheim
 
M
.
The inherited cerebellar ataxias: An update
.
J Neurol.
 
2023
;
270
(
1
):
208
222
.

4

Tian
 
Y
,
Zhou
 
L
,
Gao
 
J
, et al.  
Clinical features of NOTCH2NLC-related neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease
.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr.
 
2022
;
93
(
12
):
1289
1298
.

5

Sun
 
QY
,
Xu
 
Q
,
Tian
 
Y
, et al.  
Expansion of GGC repeat in the human-specific NOTCH2NLC gene is associated with essential tremor
.
Brain J Neurol
.
2020
;
143
(
1
):
222
233
.

6

Fan
 
Y
,
Shen
 
S
,
Yang
 
J
, et al.  
GIPC1 CGG repeat expansion is associated with movement disorders
.
Ann Neurol.
 
2022
;
91
(
5
):
704
715
.

7

Haubenberger
 
D
,
Hallett
 
M
.
Essential tremor
.
N Engl J Med.
 
2018
;
378
(
19
):
1802
1810
.

8

Shanker
 
V
.
Essential tremor: Diagnosis and management
.
BMJ (Clin Res Ed)
.
2019
;
366
:
l4485
.

9

Sternberg
 
EJ
,
Alcalay
 
RN
,
Levy
 
OA
,
Louis
 
ED
.
Postural and intention tremors: A detailed clinical study of essential tremor vs. Parkinson’s disease
.
Front Neurol.
 
2013
;
4
:
51
.

10

Deuschl
 
G
,
Wenzelburger
 
R
,
Löffler
 
K
,
Raethjen
 
J
,
Stolze
 
H
.
Essential tremor and cerebellar dysfunction clinical and kinematic analysis of intention tremor
.
Brain J Neurol.
 
2000
;
123
(
Pt 8
):
1568
1580
.

11

Louis
 
ED
,
Rios
 
E
,
Rao
 
AK
.
Tandem gait performance in essential tremor: Clinical correlates and association with midline tremors
.
Mov Disord
.
2010
;
25
(
11
):
1633
1638
.

12

Huang
 
H
,
He
 
X
,
Shen
 
Q
, et al.  
Prevalence and risk factors for abnormal tandem gait in patients with essential tremor syndrome: A cross-sectional study in Southwest China
.
Front Neurol.
 
2023
;
14
:
998205
.

13

Sun
 
Q
,
He
 
R
,
Huang
 
H
, et al.  
Age and sex affect essential tremor (ET) plus: Clinical heterogeneity in ET based on the national survey in China
.
Aging Dis.
 
2023
;
14
(
4
):
1360
1373
.

14

Kassavetis
 
P
,
Kaski
 
D
,
Anderson
 
T
,
Hallett
 
M
.
Eye movement disorders in movement disorders
.
Mov Disord Clin Pract.
 
2022
;
9
(
3
):
284
295
.

15

Visser
 
F
,
Bour
 
LJ
,
Lee
 
YX
,
Ten Brinke
 
TR
,
van Rootselaar
 
AF
.
Eye movement abnormalities in essential tremor versus tremor dominant Parkinson’s disease
.
Clin Neurophysiol
.
2019
;
130
(
5
):
683
691
.

16

van den Berg
 
KRE
,
Helmich
 
RC
.
The role of the cerebellum in tremor—Evidence from neuroimaging
.
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (New York, NY)
.
2021
;
11
:
49
.

17

Helmchen
 
C
,
Hagenow
 
A
,
Miesner
 
J
, et al.  
Eye movement abnormalities in essential tremor may indicate cerebellar dysfunction
.
Brain J Neurol.
 
2003
;
126
(
Pt 6
):
1319
1332
.

18

Lopez
 
AM
,
Trujillo
 
P
,
Hernandez
 
AB
, et al.  
Structural correlates of the sensorimotor cerebellum in Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor
.
Mov Disord
.
2020
;
35
(
7
):
1181
1188
.

19

Buijink
 
AW
,
van der Stouwe
 
AM
,
Broersma
 
M
, et al.  
Motor network disruption in essential tremor: A functional and effective connectivity study
.
Brain J Neurol.
 
2015
;
138
(
Pt 10
):
2934
2947
.

20

Kuo
 
SH
,
Lin
 
CY
,
Wang
 
J
, et al.  
Climbing fiber-Purkinje cell synaptic pathology in tremor and cerebellar degenerative diseases
.
Acta Neuropathol.
 
2017
;
133
(
1
):
121
138
.

21

Louis
 
ED
,
Martuscello
 
RT
,
Gionco
 
JT
, et al.  
Histopathology of the cerebellar cortex in essential tremor and other neurodegenerative motor disorders: Comparative analysis of 320 brains
.
Acta Neuropathol.
 
2023
;
145
(
3
):
265
283
.

22

Jankovic
 
J
,
Beach
 
J
,
Pandolfo
 
M
,
Patel
 
PI
.
Familial essential tremor in 4 kindreds. Prospects for genetic mapping
.
Arch Neurol.
 
1997
;
54
(
3
):
289
294
.

23

Bragoni
 
M
,
Fabbrini
 
G
,
Di Legge
 
S
,
Altieri
 
M
,
Di Piero
 
V
.
Anticipation of onset age in hereditary essential tremor
.
Ital J Neurol Sci.
 
1997
;
18
(
1
):
45
47
.

24

Louis
 
ED
,
Ford
 
B
,
Frucht
 
S
,
Rabinowitz
 
D
,
Ottman
 
R
.
Evidence for familial aggregation of tremor in normal individuals
.
Neurology
.
2001
;
57
(
1
):
110
114
.

25

Lorenz
 
D
,
Frederiksen
 
H
,
Moises
 
H
,
Kopper
 
F
,
Deuschl
 
G
,
Christensen
 
K
.
High concordance for essential tremor in monozygotic twins of old age
.
Neurology
.
2004
;
62
(
2
):
208
211
.

26

Tanner
 
CM
,
Goldman
 
SM
,
Lyons
 
KE
, et al.  
Essential tremor in twins: An assessment of genetic vs environmental determinants of etiology
.
Neurology
.
2001
;
57
(
8
):
1389
1391
.

27

Siokas
 
V
,
Aloizou
 
AM
,
Tsouris
 
Z
, et al.  
Genetic risk factors for essential tremor: A review
.
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (New York, NY)
.
2020
;
10
:
4
.

28

Zhou
 
X
,
Huang
 
H
,
He
 
R
, et al.  
Clinical features and reclassification of essential tremor with NOTCH2NLC GGC repeat expansions based on a long-term follow-up
.
Eur J Neurol.
 
2022
;
29
(
12
):
3600
3610
.

29

Bhatia
 
KP
,
Bain
 
P
,
Bajaj
 
N
, et al.  
Consensus statement on the classification of tremors. From the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
.
Mov Disord
.
2018
;
33
(
1
):
75
87
.

30

Zhou
 
X
,
Huang
 
HY
,
He
 
RC
, et al.  
Analysis of GIPC1 CGG repeat expansions in essential tremor
.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord.
 
2022
;
103
:
119
121
.

31

Wang
 
JL
,
Wu
 
YQ
,
Lei
 
LF
, et al.  
Polynucleotide repeat expansion of nine spinocerebellar ataxia subtypes and dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy in healthy Chinese Han population
.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi.
 
2010
;
27
(
5
):
501
505
.

32

Conforti
 
FL
,
Spataro
 
R
,
Sproviero
 
W
, et al.  
Ataxin-1 and ataxin-2 intermediate-length PolyQ expansions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
.
Neurology
.
2012
;
79
(
24
):
2315
2320
.

33

Pérez-Oliveira
 
S
,
Álvarez
 
I
,
Rosas
 
I
, et al.  
Intermediate and expanded HTT alleles and the risk for α-synucleinopathies
.
Mov Disord
.
2022
;
37
(
9
):
1841
1849
.

34

Cubo
 
E
,
Ramos-Arroyo
 
MA
,
Martinez-Horta
 
S
,
Martínez-Descalls
 
A
,
Calvo
 
S
,
Gil-Polo
 
C
.
Clinical manifestations of intermediate allele carriers in Huntington disease
.
Neurology
.
2016
;
87
(
6
):
571
578
.

35

Jain
 
S
,
Lo
 
SE
,
Louis
 
ED
.
Common misdiagnosis of a common neurological disorder: How are we misdiagnosing essential tremor?
 
Arch Neurol.
 
2006
;
63
(
8
):
1100
1104
.

36

Schrag
 
A
,
Münchau
 
A
,
Bhatia
 
KP
,
Quinn
 
NP
,
Marsden
 
CD
.
Essential tremor: An overdiagnosed condition?
 
J Neurol.
 
2000
;
247
(
12
):
955
959
.

37

Marras
 
C
,
Chaudhuri
 
KR
.
Nonmotor features of Parkinson’s disease subtypes
.
Mov Disord
.
2016
;
31
(
8
):
1095
1102
.

38

Tan
 
EK
,
Tong
 
J
,
Pavanni
 
R
,
Wong
 
MC
,
Zhao
 
Y
.
Genetic analysis of SCA 2 and 3 repeat expansions in essential tremor and atypical parkinsonism
.
Mov Disord
.
2007
;
22
(
13
):
1971
1974
.

39

Clark
 
LN
,
Ye
 
X
,
Liu
 
X
,
Mirzozoda
 
K
,
Louis
 
ED
.
Genetic analysis of ten common degenerative hereditary ataxia loci in patients with essential tremor
.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord.
 
2015
;
21
(
8
):
943
947
.

40

Nicoletti
 
G
,
Annesi
 
G
,
Carrideo
 
S
, et al.  
Familial essential tremor is not associated with SCA-12 mutation in southern Italy
.
Mov Disord
.
2002
;
17
(
4
):
837
838
.

41

Chen
 
CM
,
Hou
 
YT
,
Liu
 
JY
, et al.  
PPP2R2B CAG repeat length in the Han Chinese in Taiwan: Association analyses in neurological and psychiatric disorders and potential functional implications
.
Am J Med Genet Part B Neuropsychiatr Genet
.
2009
;
150b
(
1
):
124
129
.

42

Zühlke
 
C
,
Dalski
 
A
,
Hellenbroich
 
Y
,
Bubel
 
S
,
Schwinger
 
E
,
Bürk
 
K
.
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1): Phenotype–genotype correlation studies in intermediate alleles
.
Eur J Hum Genet EJHG
.
2002
;
10
(
3
):
204
209
.

43

Menon
 
RP
,
Nethisinghe
 
S
,
Faggiano
 
S
, et al.  
The role of interruptions in polyQ in the pathology of SCA1
.
PLoS Genet.
 
2013
;
9
(
7
):
e1003648
.

44

Kim
 
JS
,
Son
 
TO
,
Youn
 
J
,
Ki
 
CS
,
Cho
 
JW
.
Non-ataxic phenotypes of SCA8 mimicking amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson disease
.
J Clin Neurol (Seoul, Korea)
.
2013
;
9
(
4
):
274
279
.

45

Gupta
 
A
,
Jankovic
 
J
.
Spinocerebellar ataxia 8: Variable phenotype and unique pathogenesis
.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord.
 
2009
;
15
(
9
):
621
626
.

46

Gan
 
SR
,
Wang
 
J
,
Figueroa
 
KP
, et al.  
Postural tremor and ataxia progression in spinocerebellar ataxias
.
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (New York, NY)
.
2017
;
7
:
492
.

47

Juvonen
 
V
,
Hietala
 
M
,
Päivärinta
 
M
, et al.  
Clinical and genetic findings in Finnish ataxia patients with the spinocerebellar ataxia 8 repeat expansion
.
Ann Neurol.
 
2000
;
48
(
3
):
354
361
.

48

Kalia
 
LV
,
Rockman-Greenberg
 
C
,
Borys
 
A
,
Lang
 
AE
.
Tremor in spinocerebellar ataxia type 12
.
Mov Disord Clin Pract.
 
2014
;
1
(
1
):
76
78
.

49

Cen
 
Z
,
Huang
 
C
,
Yin
 
H
, et al.  
Clinical and neurophysiological features of familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy
.
Mov Disord
.
2016
;
31
(
11
):
1704
1710
.

50

van Rootselaar
 
AF
,
van Schaik
 
IN
,
van den Maagdenberg
 
AM
,
Koelman
 
JH
,
Callenbach
 
PM
,
Tijssen
 
MA
.
Familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy: A single syndromic classification for a group of pedigrees bearing common features
.
Mov Disord
.
2005
;
20
(
6
):
665
673
.

51

Ikeda
 
A
,
Kakigi
 
R
,
Funai
 
N
,
Neshige
 
R
,
Kuroda
 
Y
,
Shibasaki
 
H
.
Cortical tremor: A variant of cortical reflex myoclonus
.
Neurology
.
1990
;
40
(
10
):
1561
1565
.

52

Tan
 
EK
,
Zhao
 
Y
,
Puong
 
KY
, et al.  
Fragile X premutation alleles in SCA, ET, and parkinsonism in an Asian cohort
.
Neurology
.
2004
;
63
(
2
):
362
363
.

53

Garcia Arocena
 
D
,
Louis
 
ED
,
Tassone
 
F
, et al.  
Screen for expanded FMR1 alleles in patients with essential tremor
.
Mov Disord
.
2004
;
19
(
8
):
930
933
.

54

Deng
 
H
,
Le
 
W
,
Jankovic
 
J
.
Premutation alleles associated with Parkinson disease and essential tremor
.
Jama
.
2004
;
292
(
14
):
1685
1686
.

55

Loesch
 
DZ
,
Duffy
 
DL
,
Martin
 
NG
,
Tassone
 
F
,
Atkinson
 
A
,
Storey
 
E
.
‘Essential tremor’ phenotype in FMR1 premutation/gray zone sibling series: Exploring possible genetic modifiers
.
Twin Res Hum Genet
.
2021
;
24
(
2
):
95
102
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Supplementary data