1-20 of 11535
Sort by
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Lorenzo Fabbri and others
Brain Communications, fcaf170, https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf170
Published: 02 May 2025
Journal Article
Manuela Marescotti
Brain Communications, Volume 7, Issue 3, 2025, fcaf143, https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf143
Published: 02 May 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Marina Campins-Romeu and others
Brain Communications, fcaf168, https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf168
Published: 02 May 2025
Image
Published: 02 May 2025
Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract
Image
Published: 02 May 2025
Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract
Image
Published: 02 May 2025
Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract
Journal Article
Judy Illes and others
Brain Communications, Volume 7, Issue 3, 2025, fcaf139, https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf139
Published: 30 April 2025
Image
Published: 30 April 2025
Figure 1 Group criteria and framework of the study. ( A ) The 50 patients with PSP were classified into 2 groups. The CPSP group was defined according to a grading system for neuropathic pain (NeuPSIG) and the diagnostic criteria identified by previous study. 2 The non-CPSP group included participants wh
Image
Published: 30 April 2025
Figure 4 Relationships between elements or clinical features and CPSP or non-CPSP . ( A ) The graph indicates the relationships between each element related to neuropathic pain and the presence of CPSP. ( B ) The graph indicates the relationships between each element related to nociceptive pain and the prese
Image
Published: 30 April 2025
Figure 6 The results of VDSM in all patients (CPSP, non-CPSP and no-pain). ( A–C ) The VDSM results indicate disconnection of white matter associated with significant items in the bedside-QST among all patients (20% of the sample number). The colour bars represent Z scores; colour-highlighted disconnectio
Journal Article
Yuki Igawa and others
Brain Communications, Volume 7, Issue 3, 2025, fcaf128, https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf128
Published: 30 April 2025
Image
Published: 30 April 2025
Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract
Image
Published: 30 April 2025
Figure 3 The difference in the clinical features in the CPSP, non-CPSP and no-pain groups . ( A and C ) A radar chart showing the difference between the subgroups of each pain-related factor containing neuropathic and nociceptive elements (indicating the proportion of the total score). ( B ) The bar graph sh
Image
Published: 30 April 2025
Figure 2 Comparison of the sensory phenotype in the three subgroups. ( A ) Comparisons of scores between the subgroups in the bedside-QST, which contain thermal pain parameters. ( B ) Comparisons of scores between the subgroups in the bedside-QST, which contain thermal sensation parameters. ( C ) Comparison
Image
Published: 30 April 2025
Figure 5 Anatomical results obtained from the VLSM analyses in all patients (CPSP, non-CPSP and no-pain). ( A–F ) The VLSM results indicate the areas associated with significant items in the bedside-QST among all patients (only voxels involving at least 14 patients were included in VLSM). The colour bars re
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT EDITOR'S CHOICE
Nontapat Sukhonpanich and others
Brain Communications, fcaf166, https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf166
Published: 29 April 2025
Journal Article
Brain Communications, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2025, fcaf160, https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf160
Published: 29 April 2025
Image
Published: 29 April 2025
Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract
Image
Published: 28 April 2025
Figure 6 Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs in the migraine patients group versus healthy controls ( N = 27) . DEGs were sorted based on their log 2 FC value resulting in a pre-ranked gene list that was further used in a GSEA. Downregulated genes and associated pathways network ( A ). Upregulated genes
Image
Published: 28 April 2025
Figure 7 Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs in the female migraine patients group versus female healthy controls ( N = 14). DEGs were sorted based on their log 2 FC value resulting in a pre-ranked gene list that was further used in a GSEA. Only pathways with an FDR < 0.05 were selected as statistica