Skip to Main Content

Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff

Online ISBN:
9780191729034
Print ISBN:
9780199592814
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Book

Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff

Rowan Cruft (ed.),
Rowan Cruft
(ed.)
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Stirling
Find on
Matthew H. Kramer (ed.),
Matthew H. Kramer
(ed.)
Professor of Legal and Political Philosophy at the University of Cambridge
Find on
Mark R. Reiff (ed.)
Mark R. Reiff
(ed.)
Senior Lecturer in Legal and Political Philosophy at the University of Manchester School of Law
Find on
Published online:
22 September 2011
Published in print:
7 July 2011
Online ISBN:
9780191729034
Print ISBN:
9780199592814
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Abstract

For many years, Antony Duff has been one of the world's foremost philosophers of criminal law. This volume(s chapters, taken from essays by many of the world's other leading philosophers of criminal law as well as a reply by Duff himself, explore some of the principal themes in his work. Some of the chapters concentrate on the topic of criminalisation. That is, they examine what forms of conduct (including attempts, offensiveness, and negligence) can aptly qualify as criminal offences, and what principled limits — if any — should be placed on the reach of the criminal law. Several of the other chapters assess the thesis that punishment is justifiable as a form of communication between offenders and their community. Those chapters examine the presuppositions (about the nature and function of community, and about the moral structure of atonement) that must be embraced if communication is to be a primary role for punishment. The remaining chapters examine the nature and limits of responsibility in the law, as they engage with philosophical debates over ‘moral luck’ by investigating the ways in which the law can legitimately hold people responsible for events that were not within their control. These chapters tie the first and third parts of the book together, as they explore the relationship between the principles that determine a person's responsibility and the principles that determine which types of actions can appropriately be criminalised. Finally, Duff responds with comments that seek to defend and clarify his views while also acknowledging the correctness of some of the critics' objections.

Contents
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close