Abstract

The still young and developing space age, characterized by lunar and Martian exploration and the vision of extraterrestrial settlements, presents a unique environment to study the impact of microgravity (µg) on human physiology and disease development. Cancer research is currently a key focus of international space science, as µg fundamentally impacts cellular processes like differentiation, adhesion, migration, proliferation, survival, cell death, or growth of cancer cells as well as the cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix (ECM). By creating three-dimensional (3D) tumor models in a µg-environment, like multicellular spheroids (MCS), researchers can expedite drug discovery and development, reducing the need for animal testing.

This concise review analyses the latest knowledge on the influence of µg on cancer cells and MCS formation. We will focus on cells from brain tumors, lung, breast, thyroid, prostate, gastrointestinal, and skin cancer exposed to real (r-) and simulated (s-) µg-conditions.

Cancer research in space is important for cancer patients on Earth. Space medicine fights cancer with the help of space technologies and microgravity research. The tumor spheroid model has a high potential for preclinical testing and development of cancer drugs and is suitable for studying cancer metabolism, progression and metastasis at the molecular level.

Cancer research in space is important for cancer patients on Earth. Space medicine fights cancer with the help of space technologies and microgravity research. The tumor spheroid model has a high potential for preclinical testing and development of cancer drugs and is suitable for studying cancer metabolism, progression and metastasis at the molecular level.

Significance statement

R-μg and s-μg provide unique cell culture conditions and have demonstrated cellular and molecular changes that cannot be achieved under normal gravity on Earth. Space research is becoming increasingly important for tissue engineering, translational regenerative medicine, and cancer research, where the microgravity environment induces various changes in vitro and generates multicellular spheroids and organoids that have high potential for preclinical drug testing, anticancer drug development, and for studying the processes of cancer progression and metastasis at the molecular level. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on the effects of microgravity on cancer cells and the development of tumor spheroids.

Introduction

Cancer is the leading cause of death, with high morbidity and mortality.1 About 20 million new cancer cases alongside 9.7 million deaths from cancer were measured by the Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) in 2022.1 The disease is characterized by uncontrollable cell growth, spreading, and metastasis. Therefore, new research strategies to treat cancer are necessary. An innovative, albeit unconventional, approach to cancer research is the use of microgravity (µg) and technology from the space sciences. This “final frontier” strategy can help to discover new targets and develop future cancer therapies.2

This concise review focuses on recent studies published since 2/2020, investigating the influence of µg on cancer cells and the µg-induced development of multicellular spheroids (MCS). MCS imitate mini-metastases and areas of solid in vivo tumors.3 Spheroids resemble the in vivo tumor situation better than monolayer and suspension cell cultures, thus representing a more complex model for various applications in cancer research. Therefore, MCS are imperative tools for cell biology and physiology, immunology, molecular biology, toxicology, and pharmacology. Advanced µg-technology enables the engineering of scaffold-free and scaffold-containing 3D tissues and organoids.

Currently, numerous publications reporting the findings of recent space research have been published. On October 10, 2024, the PUBMED search “cancer and spaceflight” resulted in 272 hits and “cancer cells and spaceflight” listed 57 publications published since 2020, which is a strong indicator of the growing interest and research activity in the field of space medicine and cancer research in space.

This comprehensive review will summarize the current knowledge about the influence of r-μg and s-μg on cancer cells and MCS as metastasis models of various tumor types.

Cancer space research

Space research can be conducted on actual microgravity platforms, including manned spacecraft, unmanned satellites, the International Space Station (ISS), the Chinese Space Station (CSS) Tiangong, sounding rockets, parabolic flights, and drop towers.2,4 While real space missions are infrequent and expensive adventures, ground-based facilities like the random positioning machine (RPM), two-dimensional (2D) and 3D clinostats, and the rotating wall vessel (RWV) all offer suitable opportunities to create µg-like but radiation-free conditions4 in our terrestrial laboratories on Earth (Figure 1). These instruments, known as ground-based facilities (GBFs), have already been presented and reviewed in detail.2,4-7 The simulators use different physical methods to prevent the sedimentation of cells (aggregates). In particular, the rotation-based methods cause mechanical forces on the cells that do not occur in real (space) µg (r-µg). If the effects on the biological samples are still comparable to those of r-µg, this is referred to as “simulated µg” (s-µg).

Ground based microgravity simulators. (A) Desktop random positioning machine (RPM) 2.0 by Yuri. (B) Incubator random positioning machine (iRPM) contains miniaturized CO2 incubator mounted on the inner rotating gimbal (developed by Prof. Jörg Sekler, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland and the “Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule” (ETH) Zurich, Switzerland). (C) 3D clinostat designed by the Institute of Aerospace Medicine of The German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany. (D) Rotating wall vessel (RWV) by Synthecon Inc., Houston, TX, USA. (E) ClinoStar by CelVivo ApS, Odense, Denmark. (F) Fast rotating 2D clinostat for slide flasks developed by the Institute of Aerospace Medicine of The German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.
Figure 1.

Ground based microgravity simulators. (A) Desktop random positioning machine (RPM) 2.0 by Yuri. (B) Incubator random positioning machine (iRPM) contains miniaturized CO2 incubator mounted on the inner rotating gimbal (developed by Prof. Jörg Sekler, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland and the “Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule” (ETH) Zurich, Switzerland). (C) 3D clinostat designed by the Institute of Aerospace Medicine of The German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany. (D) Rotating wall vessel (RWV) by Synthecon Inc., Houston, TX, USA. (E) ClinoStar by CelVivo ApS, Odense, Denmark. (F) Fast rotating 2D clinostat for slide flasks developed by the Institute of Aerospace Medicine of The German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.

Cell studies during r-µg or s-µg indicate that altered gravity induces stress in mammalian cells, which activates a complex adaptive response. It is widely recognized that culturing cells under conditions of r- and s-µg can result in diverse changes in the genome, transcriptome, epigenome, proteome, secretome, or metabolome of both malignant and benign cells.6,7 Biophysically induced changes in the cytoskeleton and metabolism as well as various other biological processes often lead to reduced migration and proliferation, downregulation of MMPs and EMT-related genes by µg.8-11 In cancer cells, some of these changes can be seen as an orientation towards a less-aggressive phenotype.11 However, these results vary from cell line to cell line and these changes cannot be generalized for all cancer cell lines. Most striking, however, are the cross-cancer changes in growth behavior and the development of 3D spheroids under µg conditions.

Cells studied under s-μg (RPM, RWV, rotary cell culture system (RCCS), or clinostats can experience shear forces, residual accelerations depending on their distance to the center of rotation, and a constant mixture of the cell culture medium. These effects may eventually lead to deviations between results from r- and s-μg experiments, which makes it mandatory to confirm the results obtained from µg-simulators in space. Finally, science in space and on Earth supports the development of new patient-specific treatments and brings new ideas to the fields of regenerative medicine and cancer research.

Microgravity-induced formation of tumor spheroids

The principle of spheroid formation in all GBFs (Figure 1) is based on the rotation-prevented sedimentation of suspended adherent cells. Due to their anoikis resistance, this works particularly well with cancer cells. It is now known that the successful formation of stable 3D aggregates depends on the expression of cell-cell (cadherins) and cell-ECM binding proteins (integrins) as well as anti-adhesion proteins (mucins).12 The RPM is the only GBF offering the advantage of using 2D cell cultures in an s-µg experiment. The spheroid formation on the RPM takes place in two steps.13 Some of the 2D growing cells detach after some time due to the shear forces caused by the rotational movement of the RPM. This process has biological parallels to metastasis and is therefore also used as an in vitro metastasis model (Figure 2).2,14 Subsequently, the resuspended cells are prevented from sedimenting by the RPM movement.13 Over time, the floating cells grow into MCS, which are given stability by cadherins12 and already have structural similarities to micro-metastases. After stopping the RPM, the tumor spheroids sediment and can grow out again at the bottom of the cell culture flask. Tumor spheroids generated on the RPM show remarkably rapid and long-lasting growth and tend to have less necrosis in their center,3,15 as well as the formation of glandular spheroids with polarized cells in breast cancer cells.16,17

Overview of the RPM in vitro metastasis model. The RPM offers the advantage that 2D cell cultures in normal cell culture flasks can be used under conditions of simulated microgravity. The detachment of the cells and the subsequent microgravity-based spheroid formation (blue boxes) have many parallels to metastasis in the human body (green box), providing a good study model for the physiology of cancer spread and pharmaceutical tests. CD: cluster of differentiation, CTC: circulating tumor cells, GFR: growth factor receptor; ECM: extracellular matrix, EGFR: epithelial growth factor receptor; ESR1: estrogen-receptor 1, ICAM: Intercellular adhesion molecule, IL: interleukin, MMP: matrix metalloproteinase, VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor. Parts of the figure were drawn using pictures from Biorender.com and Servier Medical Art.
Figure 2.

Overview of the RPM in vitro metastasis model. The RPM offers the advantage that 2D cell cultures in normal cell culture flasks can be used under conditions of simulated microgravity. The detachment of the cells and the subsequent microgravity-based spheroid formation (blue boxes) have many parallels to metastasis in the human body (green box), providing a good study model for the physiology of cancer spread and pharmaceutical tests. CD: cluster of differentiation, CTC: circulating tumor cells, GFR: growth factor receptor; ECM: extracellular matrix, EGFR: epithelial growth factor receptor; ESR1: estrogen-receptor 1, ICAM: Intercellular adhesion molecule, IL: interleukin, MMP: matrix metalloproteinase, VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor. Parts of the figure were drawn using pictures from Biorender.com and Servier Medical Art.

Cancer stem cells in microgravity-shaped tumor spheroids

Tumor spheroids are unique because they are purposed for the enrichment of cancer stem cells (CSCs) or cells with stem cell-related characteristics,18,19 although this process has been little studied in µg. Understanding CSCs is crucial for developing effective cancer treatments.4,20 Targeting CSCs can potentially eradicate the root cause of tumors and prevent disease recurrence. However, CSCs also pose significant challenges in cancer therapy due to their heterogeneity within tumors,21 resistance to conventional treatments, and ability to regenerate the tumor microenvironment.22-26 Masini et al reported that long-term exposure of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells to the RPM enhanced the expression of stem cell-like markers, which may indicate the development of a more aggressive and metastatic phenotype.27 However, it remains unclear from this study whether only the MCS or all cells of the RPM samples were analyzed. Mechanical stress always alters the metabolism and behaviors of cancer cells and can cause cancer cells to attain cancer stem-like cell properties, thus driving tumor progression and promoting metastasis.28 It is also currently unknown whether CSCs have an important influence on the development and properties of tumor spheroids formed in microgravity. This will be a field of research in the coming years. Embryonic and mesenchymal stem cells are known to react very sensitively to gravitational changes.29-31

Latest studies on cancer cells exposed to microgravity conditions

Brain tumors

A brain tumor is the abnormal growth of cells in or near the brain, including areas like the pituitary gland, nerves, pineal gland, or surrounding membranes. Tumors can also form when cancer from other parts of the body spreads to the brain. There are approximately 130 types of brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors, ranging from rare to common. While much research has focused on cancer cells and cancer stem cells, few studies have explored how microgravity affects them.6

One recent example by Shaka et al aimed to explore whether r-µg triggers abnormalities in cytokinesis-induced cell proliferation by using induced pluripotent human neural stem cells (NSCs) known as CS83iCTR-33n21.32 Using time-lapse microscopy, higher rates of abnormal cell division (ACD) in NSCs exposed to µg compared to 1g were observed. Abnormalities included incomplete cell division (ICD) and multi-daughter cell division (MDCD), with an increased occurrence of more than two daughter cells after a single division.32 The findings also reveal an increased occurrence of more than two daughter cells, characteristic of a single-cell division post-cytokinesis.

The authors also investigated whether changes in NSCs during spaceflight were due to secreted molecules under µg. The secretome showed similar rates of ICD, suggesting secreted molecules rather than mechanical forces drive these effects.32 Naïve NSCs exposed to the space-produced secretome also presented increased ICD and MDCD compared to controls. This study highlights the potential health risks of µg on astronauts and may inform precautionary or therapeutic measures for long-term space exposure, though further research on the secretome’s composition is needed.6

Lung cancer

Despite its significance, publications on µg’s impact on lung cancer cells have been limited since 2020. All studies presented since then were performed under s-µg on ground facilities; none was conducted in space or during free fall or parabolic flight maneuvers. After exposure of A549 epithelial-like lung carcinoma cells to s-µg, the authors observed upregulation of FCGBP, CFB, F5, and BPIFB. According to clinical data, high gene expression of NOX1, GDA and BPIFA1 is associated with poor outcome, while upregulation of FCGBP is correlated with better prognosis,33 which raises the question whether s-µg leads to a more benign or malignant phenotype in A549 cells. Furthermore, proliferation of A549 cells decreased after 48 and 72 hours under s-µg, and their morphology changed towards a granular, clumped shape. Additionally, a mesenchymal-epithelial transition was detected (significant increase in E-cadherin, decrease in N-cadherin and MMP2 expression).

In another study, A549 cells were cultivated on an RPM for 24, 36, and 48 hours. The A549 cells showed decreased proliferation with an increased number of cells in the G1 and G2 phases.34 S-µg induced the formation of polynucleated cells and altered mitochondrial morphology, as observed via electron microscopy, with dilated cristae showing increased electron density and the presence of autophagic vacuoles. Changes in miRNA expression were detected, particularly in those regulating the cell cycle, apoptosis, and stress. Bioinformatics analyses identified that relatively few genes were responsible for these alterations in the lung cancer cells, primarily genes within the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt (PIK3R1-Akt) signaling pathway, including the negative regulator PTEN and the downstream effector FOXO3, along with cell cycle control genes (CDKN2A/1A and RB) and genes regulating mitochondrial activity (BCL2), all under the influence of TP53.

Barkia et al recently demonstrated that different lung cancer cell lines differ in the stability of the spheroids formed on the RPM.12 E-cadherin and the anti-adhesive mucin-1 play important roles in this effect. The study also showed that the RPM increases the estrogen sensitivity of Calu-3 lung adenocarcinoma cells, and thus estrogens and phenol red can influence spheroid formation and stability.

Breast cancer

Recent studies have shown that µg significantly impacts breast cancer cells, affecting cytoskeletal structure, gene expression, extracellular vesicle (EV) dynamics, and spheroid formation. The following section compiles key findings, focusing on breast cancer cell lines MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and CRL2351 under s-µg.

The effect of s-µg on MCF-7-derived MCS has been studied after 72 hours of RPM exposure.35 There were significant disruptions in cytoskeletal structure, with short, fragmented actin filaments localized around the perinuclear region and a disorganized tubulin network. These changes were associated with a marked reduction in vinculin, a focal adhesion protein, and diminished extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, essential for cell survival. The study suggested that disrupted focal adhesion kinase (FAK)–integrin complexes may impair ERK signaling in MCS cells under s-µg, while β1-integrin was nearly absent in RPM-induced MCS, resulting in increased apoptosis rates.

Several studies focused on the gene expression changes in breast cancer cells and spheroids under s-µg. Calvaruso et al analyzed MDA-MB-231-derived MCS after 72 h in s-µg and reported upregulation of genes related to proliferation (AKT, KI67), cancer stemness (CD44), and metastasis (MMP9).36 Interestingly, they observed an increase in BCL2 (an anti-apoptotic gene) and a decrease in BAX (a pro-apoptotic gene), suggesting a potential shift towards enhanced survival and stemness under µg conditions. A related study investigated the gene expression in MCS derived from CRL2351 human breast cancer cells after five days in s-µg.37 Upregulation of several key genes, including BRCA1, RHOA, VIM, HER2, and MAPK1, which are associated with cell proliferation, migration, and cytoskeletal dynamics, was observed. Notably, HER2 was upregulated, while RAB27A, a gene involved in vesicle trafficking, was downregulated. These findings underscore the complexity of gene regulation under µg, with potential implications for cancer progression and metastasis.

EVs have emerged as important mediators of intercellular communication and are particularly relevant in cancer biology. Thus, MDA-MB-231 cells exposed to µg for 96 h showed upregulation of several Ras-like small GTPases, including RalA, RalB, RhoA, RhoC, CDC42, and Rab13, in their derived EVs.38 Additionally, the EV release rate decreased, but the average EV size increased, suggesting that µg may alter EV biogenesis and content. Wise et al. extended these findings by studying MCF-7 breast cancer cells under s-µg for 5 and 10 days.39 They observed increased secretion of EVs and higher expression levels of the tetraspanins CD81, CD63, and CD9, which are markers of exosomes. This indicates that prolonged exposure to µg might enhance EV-mediated communication, potentially affecting cancer cell behavior and microenvironmental interactions.

Recent studies have examined the formation of MCS and their metastatic potential under µg. MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells exposed to an RPM for 14 days showed differential regulation of key mRNAs compared to 2D cultures.40 These findings highlighted the involvement of mRNAs related to ERK1, AKT1, MAPK14, EGFR, CTNNA1, CTNNB1, ITGB1, COL4A5, ACTB, and TUBB, as well as EGF/MAP kinase signaling pathways, with variations by cell type. Bioinformatics analyses suggested a positive association between these spheroids and the metastatic microtumor environment, indicating that µg may enhance metastatic traits in breast cancer cells.

These studies reveal how µg affects the breast cancer cell behavior, potentially enhancing metastasis and altering cell communication. The findings highlight the importance of µg-research in cancer biology and its potential for developing new therapies, especially for aggressive metastatic breast cancers.

Thyroid cancer

The most studied thyroid cancer cell line under spaceflight conditions in recent years is the follicular thyroid cancer (FTC)-133 cell line. As part of the CellBox-1 experiment, FTC-133 cells were cultured on the ISS for 12 days.41,42 Differences between flight and ground supernatant samples were found in the number of secreted exosomes and the distribution of tetraspanins on their surface.42 Exosomes are known to regulate the surrounding microenvironment of tumors and can modulate immune and therapy responses, and promote angiogenesis, tumorigenesis, and ECM remodeling.43-47 Tetraspanins are involved in cancer cell motility, metastasis, tumor initiation, progression, and angiogenesis.48,49 Particularly, a higher content of CD63 and CD81 tetraspanins was found in flight samples. CD63 and CD81 expression are associated with tumor invasion and tumor growth, respectively.50,51 Additionally, a total of 119 miRNAs were altered, of which 23 were associated with thyroid cancer.41 These included the downregulation of hsa-miR-429, hsa-miR-199, and hsa-miR-128-3p, which have been described as tumor suppressors.52-54

The CellBox-2 experiment reported the formation of MCS from FTC-133 cells cultured for 5 and 10 days on the ISS. Changes in gene expression included ECM components (COL1A1, ITGB1), cell adhesion factors (CAV1, ICAM1, SRC, VCL, PXN), growth factors (EGFR), cytokines (IL6, CXCL8), and other signaling molecules (RELA, ERK1, ERK2).55 MCS formation from thyroid cancer cells under s-µg has been reported recently for multiple cell lines, including FTC-133, WRO, and the Korean SNU-790 and SNU-80.14,56 The transition from 2D to 3D growth is considered a more physiologically relevant tumor model and allows for the study of drugs and possible therapy targets.57,58 Dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid used in combination with cancer therapeutics, selectively inhibits MCS formation in a dose-dependent manner in FTC-133 cells exposed to s-µg.14,57,59,60 Based on the analysis, components of the ECM (laminin, fibronectin, MMP-9), anti-adhesion molecules (mucin-1), cell junction (E-cadherin, β-catenin, FAK), p38, and the phosphorylated glucocorticoid receptor are possible targets of dexamethasone.14 Finally, it was recently reported that cell detachment and MCS formation in FTC-133 cells are independent processes affected by different conditions such as cell flask geometry, averaged gravity vector direction over time, angular velocity, fluid flow, and amount of air bubbles.13

Prostate cancer

Prostate cancer cells exposed to μg conditions offer a unique opportunity to advance our understanding of cancer mechanisms and identify novel therapeutic strategies, and the prostate cancer cell line PC-3 has been a much-valued model for studies under r- and s-μg conditions. Schulz et al took advantage of a parabolic flight opportunity to investigate early responders across the whole transcriptome to altered µg conditions.61 Adaptations of the F-actin cytoskeleton-like stress fibers and pseudopodia were visible after the first parabola. In addition to an identified network of relevant prostate cancer cytokines and chemokines differentially expressed under µg (IL6 and CXCL8), regulatory lncRNAs and microRNAs were found to be altered under µg (miR221/222, MIR222HG, MIR3142HG, and LINC02605). In total, 298 potential biomarkers were identified, which were potentially relevant markers for carcinogenesis and inflammatory pathways.

It is known that PC-3 cells exposed to s-μg conditions form MCS. PC-3 cells were grown on the RPM for 3 and 5 days.62 The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling components (VEGFA, FLK1, FLT1, SRC1, AKT1, MTOR, ERK1/2, LCN2) were found to be altered in MCS compared to 1g controls as well as components of the cytoskeleton (ACTB, TUBB), ECM (LAMA3, COL1A1, FN1, COL4A5), and focal adhesion complex (VCL, CDH1). Since most of these components were upregulated, the authors suggested that µg may affect the regulation of tumor progression and angiogenesis.62-64 Dietrichs et al cultured PC-3 cells on the RPM for up to 24 hours to study the early cytokine gene expression and the secretion profile.65 After 24 hours, MCS formation was detected and an increased cytokine gene expression of IL6, CXCL8, and IL1A was reported. Cytoskeleton components (ACTB, MSN) were also increased in MCS after 24 hours along with ECM components (FN1, COL1A1, TIMP1, and LAMA3). The PAM, MAPK, and VEGF signaling pathways were proposed as the underlying pathways causing MCS formation in PC-3 cells, for which an increased gene expression of VEGF, FLT1, and EGFR was reported.65 All in all, PC-3 cells exposed to s-μg demonstrate MCS formation, a proinflammatory phenotype, as well as alterations of the cytoskeleton, ECM, and focal adhesion complex when indicating their impact on the growth and progression of these cells.

Gastrointestinal tumors

In recent years, no specific emphasis was directed on µg-induced spheroid formation in gastrointestinal or liver tumors, only a few studies have focused on the influence of the µg-environment on the metabolism and chemoresistance of gastrointestinal cancer cells. As described by Chen et al, an RCCS had a major effect on the lipid metabolism of highly malignant HGC-27 gastric cancer cells and induced glycolytic pathways.66 Rembiałkowska et al described that µg attenuates the effect of genes associated with drug resistance in gastric cancer cells, which could be of benefit in case of resistance to chemotherapy. In their likewise RCCS-based study, s-µg altered the expression of multidrug resistance genes in EPG85-257 cells, induced changes in cancer cell survival and in the cellular cytoskeleton, making the cells more susceptible to chemotherapy.67 Masini et al found that pancreatic cancer cells cultured on an RPM were transformed toward a more stem and aggressive phenotype. The observed restructuring of actin, formation of tumor spheroids, and enhancement of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition may also affect the susceptibility of the tumor cells to drugs and lead to the acquisition of an aggressive and metastatic stem cell-like phenotype.27

Smit et al aimed to create a new 3D model for pharmaceutical tests by culturing encapsulated LS180 colorectal cancer spheroids on a clinostat. After 20 days of s-µg culture and subsequent treatment with paclitaxel, the spheroid model proved to be suitable for testing new chemotherapeutic agents against colorectal cancer.68

Skin cancers (melanoma)

Since 2020, only one original study looking at the effects of s-µg on skin cancers could be identified. This study used a “Lab-on-a-Chip” (LOC) device.69 Although some inhibiting influence of the LOC environment on cell viability was partially observed, viability increased for HaCaT and A375 cells under s-µg by clinorotation compared to 1g. Mitochondrial activity increased under s-µg but was again partially inhibited by the LOC environment. Proliferation of HaCaT and A375 cells was inhibited by s-µg and furthermore, cell morphology changed towards a shrunken and round shape. The cells developed lamellipodia, decreased filopodia and stress fibers, and actin fibers were disrupted and arranged in peripheral parts of the cytoplasm in both cell lines. Going forward, a LOC may help to facilitate research under r- and s-µg conditions by providing initial analysis tools right within the µg environment, enabling more direct and more “in-time” data generation.

The spheroid model as new option for pharmacological research

Cancer cell spheroids, which are 3D clusters of cancer cells, are increasingly utilized in pharmacological research because they closely mimic the tumor microenvironment (TME) found in the human body.70 Various methods for generating spheroids include the hanging drop method,71 liquid overlay method, spinner flask method, microfluidic devices, magnetic levitation, and the scaffold method, each with unique advantages and limitations in modeling tumor biology. Spheroids are essential for studying tumor characteristics, such as cell morphology, gene expression, and interactions with the surrounding environment, including immune cells.72 Tumor-associated macrophages, prevalent in the TME of solid tumors and linked to poor patient outcomes, can be incorporated into spheroids to investigate cancer-immune cell interactions crucial for developing immunotherapies.70,73

One of the unique characteristics of spheroids is their ability to become hypoxic at the core, a trait shared with many solid tumors. This unique characteristic makes spheroids an ideal platform for studying how cancer cells adapt to low-oxygen conditions, a crucial aspect of cancer development. The potential of spheroids in this area is intriguing and inspiring, as it opens new possibilities for testing drugs that target hypoxic cells and understanding the adaptive mechanisms of cancer cells.70,72,73 In a recent study, endothelial cell culture on porous microfluidic channel surfaces was magnetically attached to tumor spheroids generated on a composite polymer-hydrogel microwell plate, which allowed the study of the pro-angiogenic endothelial cell organization and prevented the angiogenesis by inhibition of the VEGF pathway and the Notch signaling pathway.74

Due to the replication of the complex cell-cell-matrix interactions, nutrients, and oxygen gradients found in actual tumors, spheroids are a more accurate model for testing the effectiveness of anticancer drugs than traditional 2D cell cultures. However, the lack of generation of spheroids with uniform size and shape limits their usage in anti-cancer research and high-throughput drug screening. Even though the hanging drop method and liquid overlay technique allow for the generation of uniform spheroids, which can be used in high-throughput drug screening75,76 they are labor-intensive for large-scale production,77 resulting in low-throughput fabrication and variation in the spheroid sizes. However, combining the spheroid production with culture in microfluidic devices allows controllable cell perfusion, simulation of fluid shear effects, and mimicking of the microenvironment-like in vivo conditions improved the approach for drug testing.78,79

In summary, 3D tumor spheroids are valuable for screening anti-cancer drugs, assessing cytotoxicity, investigating tumor cell behavior, evaluating treatment resistance and immunotherapy effects, providing insights that enhance the effectiveness of targeted cancer therapies.80,81

Conclusion and future perspectives

The age of space exploration has just begun. Private companies offer short-term trips into space. Moon and Mars missions are planned soon. Since 2020, many publications have appeared reporting data from space research. On October 10, 2024, a PubMed search for “microgravity” and “cells” since 2020 gave 621 hits and for “spaceflight” and “cells” 449 results were obtained. This review discusses the recent literature about the effects of μg on cancer cells and the generation of 3D tumor spheroids, as an important common finding is that exposure of a variety of cancer cells to spaceflight or μg-simulating devices triggers the aggregation of cancer cells in vitro. The current literature reports on spheroid and organoid formation (Table 1) which might be used as metastasis and neoangiogenesis models for different cancer-type therapies.2

Table 1.

Summary of review articles addressing cancer cells exposed to microgravity conditions and 3D MCS formation.

Cell lineOriginMicrogravity
platform
TimelineFindingsRef.
Brain tumors
CS83iCTR-33n21Neural stem cellsISS39,6 dIncomplete cell division; impaired cytokinesis; multi-daughter cell division and alterations in the secretome32
Lung cancer
A549Lung carcinomaRWV/ hanging drop48, 72 dReverted epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotype; impaired proliferation and cell morphological changes33
RPM24, 36, 48 hImpaired proliferation; presence of polynucleated cells; altered morphology of mitochondria and alterations in miRNAs involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and stress34
Calu-3Lung adenocarcinoma3 dIncreased estrogen sensitivity and altered spheroid stability12
NCI-H1703Lung squamosal carcinomaAltered spheroid stability
MCF-7Breast carcinoma72 hDisruption of actin and tubulin network in MCS; reductions in Vinculin; ERK inactivation and observed apoptosis35
Breast cancer
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinomaRPM72 hUpregulation of genes related to proliferation, cancer stemness and metastasis36
CRL2351Breast adenocarcinoma5 dGene analysis
Upregulation of genes related to proliferation, migration and cytoskeletal dynamics
Downregulation of genes involved in vesicle trafficking
Cytoskeletal rearrangement into a spherical shape
37
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinomaGravite system96 hUpregulation of Ras-like small GTPases; allterations in extracellular vesicles biogenesis and content38
MCF-7Breast carcinomaRPM
5, 10 dIncreased secretion of extracellular vesicles; increased exosome marker expression such as CD81, CD63, and CD939
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinoma14 dInvolvement of novel genes related to cellular signaling pathways (MAPK, PAM, and VEGF) in spheroids40
Thyroid cancer
FTC-133Follicular thyroid carcinomaISS12 dAltered exosome subpopulation42
5, 10 dChanges in gene expression of ECM components, cell adhesion factors, growth factors, cytokines and others such as RELA, ERK1, ERK255
RPM4 h, 3 dDexamethasone inhibits MCS formation; possible targets include ECM components, anti-adhesion molecules, cell junctions and phosphorylated glucocorticoid receptor14,57
1, 3 dMCS formation influenced by cell flask geometry, averaged gravity vector direction, angular velocity, fluid flow, and air bubbles13
Prostate cancer
PC-3Prostate adeno-carcinomaParabolic flight/Presence of F-actin stress fibers and pseudopodia; early differential expression of IL6 and CXCL8; alterations in regulatory lncRNAs and microRNAs61
RPM3, 5 dAlterations in VEGF signaling components, cytoskeleton components, ECM components, and the focal adhesion complex, suggest a more aggressive cancer phenotype under microgravity conditions62
0.5, 2, 4 and 24 hGene analysis
Upregulation of genes related to cytokine production such as IL6, CXCL8, and IL1A
Upregulation of genes related to cytoskeleton components and ECM components
Activated PAM signaling pathways in MCS
65
Gastrointestinal cancer
HGC-27Gastric carcinomaRCCS1,3 dInduced glycolytic pathways66
EPG85-257Gastric carcinoma24, 48, 72, 96 hAltered expression of multidrug resistance genes; cytoskeletal reorganization; changes in cell survival; increased cell susceptibility to chemotherapy67
PaCa-44Pancreatic adenocarcinomaRPM1, 7, 9 dPresence of an aggressive and metastatic stem cell-like phenotype; actin reorganization, enhanced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition27
CFPAC-1Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
LS180Colorectal adenocarcinomaClinostat20 dVerified spheroids as a suitable model for pharmaceutical testing68
Skin cancer
HaCaTAneuploid immortal keratino-cyteClinostat2 hIncreased viability and mitochondrial activity; inhibited proliferation; altered cell morphology with a shrinked and rounded shape and lamellipodia but decreased filopodia and stress fibers; showed a disrupted actin network69
A375malignant melanoma
Cell lineOriginMicrogravity
platform
TimelineFindingsRef.
Brain tumors
CS83iCTR-33n21Neural stem cellsISS39,6 dIncomplete cell division; impaired cytokinesis; multi-daughter cell division and alterations in the secretome32
Lung cancer
A549Lung carcinomaRWV/ hanging drop48, 72 dReverted epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotype; impaired proliferation and cell morphological changes33
RPM24, 36, 48 hImpaired proliferation; presence of polynucleated cells; altered morphology of mitochondria and alterations in miRNAs involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and stress34
Calu-3Lung adenocarcinoma3 dIncreased estrogen sensitivity and altered spheroid stability12
NCI-H1703Lung squamosal carcinomaAltered spheroid stability
MCF-7Breast carcinoma72 hDisruption of actin and tubulin network in MCS; reductions in Vinculin; ERK inactivation and observed apoptosis35
Breast cancer
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinomaRPM72 hUpregulation of genes related to proliferation, cancer stemness and metastasis36
CRL2351Breast adenocarcinoma5 dGene analysis
Upregulation of genes related to proliferation, migration and cytoskeletal dynamics
Downregulation of genes involved in vesicle trafficking
Cytoskeletal rearrangement into a spherical shape
37
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinomaGravite system96 hUpregulation of Ras-like small GTPases; allterations in extracellular vesicles biogenesis and content38
MCF-7Breast carcinomaRPM
5, 10 dIncreased secretion of extracellular vesicles; increased exosome marker expression such as CD81, CD63, and CD939
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinoma14 dInvolvement of novel genes related to cellular signaling pathways (MAPK, PAM, and VEGF) in spheroids40
Thyroid cancer
FTC-133Follicular thyroid carcinomaISS12 dAltered exosome subpopulation42
5, 10 dChanges in gene expression of ECM components, cell adhesion factors, growth factors, cytokines and others such as RELA, ERK1, ERK255
RPM4 h, 3 dDexamethasone inhibits MCS formation; possible targets include ECM components, anti-adhesion molecules, cell junctions and phosphorylated glucocorticoid receptor14,57
1, 3 dMCS formation influenced by cell flask geometry, averaged gravity vector direction, angular velocity, fluid flow, and air bubbles13
Prostate cancer
PC-3Prostate adeno-carcinomaParabolic flight/Presence of F-actin stress fibers and pseudopodia; early differential expression of IL6 and CXCL8; alterations in regulatory lncRNAs and microRNAs61
RPM3, 5 dAlterations in VEGF signaling components, cytoskeleton components, ECM components, and the focal adhesion complex, suggest a more aggressive cancer phenotype under microgravity conditions62
0.5, 2, 4 and 24 hGene analysis
Upregulation of genes related to cytokine production such as IL6, CXCL8, and IL1A
Upregulation of genes related to cytoskeleton components and ECM components
Activated PAM signaling pathways in MCS
65
Gastrointestinal cancer
HGC-27Gastric carcinomaRCCS1,3 dInduced glycolytic pathways66
EPG85-257Gastric carcinoma24, 48, 72, 96 hAltered expression of multidrug resistance genes; cytoskeletal reorganization; changes in cell survival; increased cell susceptibility to chemotherapy67
PaCa-44Pancreatic adenocarcinomaRPM1, 7, 9 dPresence of an aggressive and metastatic stem cell-like phenotype; actin reorganization, enhanced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition27
CFPAC-1Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
LS180Colorectal adenocarcinomaClinostat20 dVerified spheroids as a suitable model for pharmaceutical testing68
Skin cancer
HaCaTAneuploid immortal keratino-cyteClinostat2 hIncreased viability and mitochondrial activity; inhibited proliferation; altered cell morphology with a shrinked and rounded shape and lamellipodia but decreased filopodia and stress fibers; showed a disrupted actin network69
A375malignant melanoma
Table 1.

Summary of review articles addressing cancer cells exposed to microgravity conditions and 3D MCS formation.

Cell lineOriginMicrogravity
platform
TimelineFindingsRef.
Brain tumors
CS83iCTR-33n21Neural stem cellsISS39,6 dIncomplete cell division; impaired cytokinesis; multi-daughter cell division and alterations in the secretome32
Lung cancer
A549Lung carcinomaRWV/ hanging drop48, 72 dReverted epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotype; impaired proliferation and cell morphological changes33
RPM24, 36, 48 hImpaired proliferation; presence of polynucleated cells; altered morphology of mitochondria and alterations in miRNAs involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and stress34
Calu-3Lung adenocarcinoma3 dIncreased estrogen sensitivity and altered spheroid stability12
NCI-H1703Lung squamosal carcinomaAltered spheroid stability
MCF-7Breast carcinoma72 hDisruption of actin and tubulin network in MCS; reductions in Vinculin; ERK inactivation and observed apoptosis35
Breast cancer
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinomaRPM72 hUpregulation of genes related to proliferation, cancer stemness and metastasis36
CRL2351Breast adenocarcinoma5 dGene analysis
Upregulation of genes related to proliferation, migration and cytoskeletal dynamics
Downregulation of genes involved in vesicle trafficking
Cytoskeletal rearrangement into a spherical shape
37
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinomaGravite system96 hUpregulation of Ras-like small GTPases; allterations in extracellular vesicles biogenesis and content38
MCF-7Breast carcinomaRPM
5, 10 dIncreased secretion of extracellular vesicles; increased exosome marker expression such as CD81, CD63, and CD939
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinoma14 dInvolvement of novel genes related to cellular signaling pathways (MAPK, PAM, and VEGF) in spheroids40
Thyroid cancer
FTC-133Follicular thyroid carcinomaISS12 dAltered exosome subpopulation42
5, 10 dChanges in gene expression of ECM components, cell adhesion factors, growth factors, cytokines and others such as RELA, ERK1, ERK255
RPM4 h, 3 dDexamethasone inhibits MCS formation; possible targets include ECM components, anti-adhesion molecules, cell junctions and phosphorylated glucocorticoid receptor14,57
1, 3 dMCS formation influenced by cell flask geometry, averaged gravity vector direction, angular velocity, fluid flow, and air bubbles13
Prostate cancer
PC-3Prostate adeno-carcinomaParabolic flight/Presence of F-actin stress fibers and pseudopodia; early differential expression of IL6 and CXCL8; alterations in regulatory lncRNAs and microRNAs61
RPM3, 5 dAlterations in VEGF signaling components, cytoskeleton components, ECM components, and the focal adhesion complex, suggest a more aggressive cancer phenotype under microgravity conditions62
0.5, 2, 4 and 24 hGene analysis
Upregulation of genes related to cytokine production such as IL6, CXCL8, and IL1A
Upregulation of genes related to cytoskeleton components and ECM components
Activated PAM signaling pathways in MCS
65
Gastrointestinal cancer
HGC-27Gastric carcinomaRCCS1,3 dInduced glycolytic pathways66
EPG85-257Gastric carcinoma24, 48, 72, 96 hAltered expression of multidrug resistance genes; cytoskeletal reorganization; changes in cell survival; increased cell susceptibility to chemotherapy67
PaCa-44Pancreatic adenocarcinomaRPM1, 7, 9 dPresence of an aggressive and metastatic stem cell-like phenotype; actin reorganization, enhanced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition27
CFPAC-1Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
LS180Colorectal adenocarcinomaClinostat20 dVerified spheroids as a suitable model for pharmaceutical testing68
Skin cancer
HaCaTAneuploid immortal keratino-cyteClinostat2 hIncreased viability and mitochondrial activity; inhibited proliferation; altered cell morphology with a shrinked and rounded shape and lamellipodia but decreased filopodia and stress fibers; showed a disrupted actin network69
A375malignant melanoma
Cell lineOriginMicrogravity
platform
TimelineFindingsRef.
Brain tumors
CS83iCTR-33n21Neural stem cellsISS39,6 dIncomplete cell division; impaired cytokinesis; multi-daughter cell division and alterations in the secretome32
Lung cancer
A549Lung carcinomaRWV/ hanging drop48, 72 dReverted epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotype; impaired proliferation and cell morphological changes33
RPM24, 36, 48 hImpaired proliferation; presence of polynucleated cells; altered morphology of mitochondria and alterations in miRNAs involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and stress34
Calu-3Lung adenocarcinoma3 dIncreased estrogen sensitivity and altered spheroid stability12
NCI-H1703Lung squamosal carcinomaAltered spheroid stability
MCF-7Breast carcinoma72 hDisruption of actin and tubulin network in MCS; reductions in Vinculin; ERK inactivation and observed apoptosis35
Breast cancer
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinomaRPM72 hUpregulation of genes related to proliferation, cancer stemness and metastasis36
CRL2351Breast adenocarcinoma5 dGene analysis
Upregulation of genes related to proliferation, migration and cytoskeletal dynamics
Downregulation of genes involved in vesicle trafficking
Cytoskeletal rearrangement into a spherical shape
37
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinomaGravite system96 hUpregulation of Ras-like small GTPases; allterations in extracellular vesicles biogenesis and content38
MCF-7Breast carcinomaRPM
5, 10 dIncreased secretion of extracellular vesicles; increased exosome marker expression such as CD81, CD63, and CD939
MDA-MB-231Breast carcinoma14 dInvolvement of novel genes related to cellular signaling pathways (MAPK, PAM, and VEGF) in spheroids40
Thyroid cancer
FTC-133Follicular thyroid carcinomaISS12 dAltered exosome subpopulation42
5, 10 dChanges in gene expression of ECM components, cell adhesion factors, growth factors, cytokines and others such as RELA, ERK1, ERK255
RPM4 h, 3 dDexamethasone inhibits MCS formation; possible targets include ECM components, anti-adhesion molecules, cell junctions and phosphorylated glucocorticoid receptor14,57
1, 3 dMCS formation influenced by cell flask geometry, averaged gravity vector direction, angular velocity, fluid flow, and air bubbles13
Prostate cancer
PC-3Prostate adeno-carcinomaParabolic flight/Presence of F-actin stress fibers and pseudopodia; early differential expression of IL6 and CXCL8; alterations in regulatory lncRNAs and microRNAs61
RPM3, 5 dAlterations in VEGF signaling components, cytoskeleton components, ECM components, and the focal adhesion complex, suggest a more aggressive cancer phenotype under microgravity conditions62
0.5, 2, 4 and 24 hGene analysis
Upregulation of genes related to cytokine production such as IL6, CXCL8, and IL1A
Upregulation of genes related to cytoskeleton components and ECM components
Activated PAM signaling pathways in MCS
65
Gastrointestinal cancer
HGC-27Gastric carcinomaRCCS1,3 dInduced glycolytic pathways66
EPG85-257Gastric carcinoma24, 48, 72, 96 hAltered expression of multidrug resistance genes; cytoskeletal reorganization; changes in cell survival; increased cell susceptibility to chemotherapy67
PaCa-44Pancreatic adenocarcinomaRPM1, 7, 9 dPresence of an aggressive and metastatic stem cell-like phenotype; actin reorganization, enhanced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition27
CFPAC-1Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
LS180Colorectal adenocarcinomaClinostat20 dVerified spheroids as a suitable model for pharmaceutical testing68
Skin cancer
HaCaTAneuploid immortal keratino-cyteClinostat2 hIncreased viability and mitochondrial activity; inhibited proliferation; altered cell morphology with a shrinked and rounded shape and lamellipodia but decreased filopodia and stress fibers; showed a disrupted actin network69
A375malignant melanoma

In vitro investigations with focus on the mechanisms for spheroid generation using OMICS technology and in silico methods can enhance the current knowledge about in vivo epithelial to mesenchymal transition, cancer progression, and metastasis. Furthermore, this new approach technology referring to biomedical space research provides new information by applying in vitro (human cancer cell culture), in silico/artificial intelligence or in chemico (ie, pharmacological/toxicological tests) technologies. By studying cancer cells in microgravity, researchers can observe how tumors grow and respond to treatments in a way that better mimics the behavior of tumors in the human body than conventional 2D culture models. These findings could pave the way for improved drug screening platforms that test treatments under more realistic, 3D conditions, leading to more effective therapies tailored to the genetic and molecular profiles of individual patients. In this way, space medicine is helping to develop novel therapies that can be translated to in vivo models while reducing the use of laboratory animals.

Although real space conditions still leave more questions for cancer progression, including the inclusion of space radiation and a compromised immune system under space conditions, the knowledge gained from space research is already supporting medicine and research on Earth.

Funding

This work was supported by the German Space Agency at DLR (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, grant numbers 50WB2219 and 50WK2270G).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Daniela Grimm, Marcus Krüger, Thomas J. Corydon (Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing). Thomas J. Corydon, Jayashree Sahana, Ulf Simonsen, Luis Fernando González-Torres, Armin Kraus, Jayashree Sahana, Petra M. Wise (Writing—original draft). Marcus Krüger, Shannon Marchal (Visualization)

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

1.

Bray
F
,
Laversanne
M
,
Sung
H
, et al.
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
.
CA Cancer J Clin
.
2024
;
74
:
229
-
263
. https://doi.org/

2.

Grimm
D
,
Schulz
H
,
Krüger
M
, et al.
The fight against cancer by microgravity: the multicellular spheroid as a metastasis model
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2022
;
23
:
3073
. https://doi.org/

3.

Krüger
M
,
Melnik
D
,
Kopp
S
, et al.
Fighting thyroid cancer with microgravity research
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2019
;
20
:
2553
. https://doi.org/

4.

Grimm
D
,
Wehland
M
,
Corydon
TJ
, et al.
The effects of microgravity on differentiation and cell growth in stem cells and cancer stem cells
.
Stem Cells Transl. Med
.
2020
;
9
:
882
-
894
. https://doi.org/

5.

Corydon
TJ
,
Schulz
H
,
Richter
P
, et al.
Current knowledge about the impact of microgravity on gene regulation
.
Cells
.
2023
;
12
:
1043
. https://doi.org/

6.

Graf
J
,
Schulz
H
,
Wehland
M
, et al.
Omics studies of tumor cells under microgravity conditions
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2024
;
25
:
926
. https://doi.org/

7.

Abdelfattah
F
,
Schulz
H
,
Wehland
M
, et al.
Omics studies of specialized cells and stem cells under microgravity conditions
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2024
;
25
:
10014
. https://doi.org/

8.

Ma
X
,
Pietsch
J
,
Wehland
M
, et al.
Differential gene expression profile and altered cytokine secretion of thyroid cancer cells in space
.
FASEB J
.
2014
;
28
:
813
-
835
. https://doi.org/

9.

Chen
ZY
,
Guo
S
,
Li
BB
, et al.
Effect of weightlessness on the 3D structure formation and physiologic function of human cancer cells
.
Biomed Res Int
.
2019
;
2019
:
4894083
. https://doi.org/

10.

Chang
D
,
Xu
H
,
Guo
Y
, et al.
Simulated microgravity alters the metastatic potential of a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line
.
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim
.
2013
;
49
:
170
-
177
. https://doi.org/

11.

Topal
U
,
Zamur
C.
Microgravity, stem cells, and cancer: a new hope for cancer treatment
.
Stem Cells Int
.
2021
;
2021
:
5566872
. https://doi.org/

12.

Barkia
B
,
Sandt
V
,
Melnik
D
, et al.
The formation of stable lung tumor spheroids during random positioning involves increased estrogen sensitivity
.
Biomolecules
.
2024
;
14
:
1292
. https://doi.org/

13.

Cortés-Sánchez
JL
,
Melnik
D
,
Sandt
V
, et al.
Fluid and bubble flow detach adherent cancer cells to form spheroids on a random positioning machine
.
Cells
.
2023
;
12
:
2665
. https://doi.org/

14.

Melnik
D
,
Cortés-Sánchez
JL
,
Sandt
V
, et al.
Dexamethasone selectively inhibits detachment of metastatic thyroid cancer cells during random positioning
.
Cancers (Basel)
.
2023
;
15
:
1641
. https://doi.org/

15.

Kopp
S
,
Warnke
E
,
Wehland
M
, et al.
Mechanisms of three-dimensional growth of thyroid cells during long-term simulated microgravity
.
Sci Rep
.
2015
;
5
:
16691
. https://doi.org/

16.

Nassef
MZ
,
Melnik
D
,
Kopp
S
, et al.
Breast cancer cells in microgravity: new aspects for cancer research
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2020
;
21
:
7345
. https://doi.org/

17.

Kopp
S
,
Slumstrup
L
,
Corydon
TJ
, et al.
Identifications of novel mechanisms in breast cancer cells involving duct-like multicellular spheroid formation after exposure to the Random Positioning Machine
.
Sci Rep
.
2016
;
6
:
26887
. https://doi.org/

18.

Fotinós
J
,
Marks
MP
,
Barberis
L
,
Vellón
L.
Assessing the distribution of cancer stem cells in tumorspheres
.
Sci Rep
.
2024
;
14
:
11013
. https://doi.org/

19.

Ishiguro
T
,
Ohata
H
,
Sato
A
, et al.
Tumor-derived spheroids: relevance to cancer stem cells and clinical applications
.
Cancer Sci
.
2017
;
108
:
283
-
289
. https://doi.org/

20.

Yang
L
,
Shi
P
,
Zhao
G
, et al.
Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy
.
Signal Transduct Target Ther
.
2020
;
5
:
8
. https://doi.org/

21.

Tang
DG.
Understanding cancer stem cell heterogeneity and plasticity
.
Cell Res
.
2012
;
22
:
457
-
472
. https://doi.org/

22.

Afify
SM
,
Seno
M.
Conversion of stem cells to cancer stem cells: undercurrent of cancer initiation
.
Cancers (Basel)
.
2019
;
11
:
345
. https://doi.org/

23.

Atashzar
MR
,
Baharlou
R
,
Karami
J
, et al.
Cancer stem cells: a review from origin to therapeutic implications
.
J Cell Physiol
.
2020
;
235
:
790
-
803
. https://doi.org/

24.

Ayob
AZ
,
Ramasamy
TS.
Cancer stem cells as key drivers of tumour progression
.
J Biomed Sci
.
2018
;
25
:
20
. https://doi.org/

25.

Kuşoğlu
A
,
Biray Avcı
C.
Cancer stem cells: a brief review of the current status
.
Gene
.
2019
;
681
:
80
-
85
. https://doi.org/

26.

Shaikh
MV
,
Custers
S
,
Anand
A
, et al.
Cancer stem cells: current challenges and future perspectives
.
Methods Mol Biol
.
2024
;
2777
:
1
-
18
. https://doi.org/

27.

Masini
MA
,
Bonetto
V
,
Manfredi
M
, et al.
Prolonged exposure to simulated microgravity promotes stemness impairing morphological, metabolic and migratory profile of pancreatic cancer cells: a comprehensive proteomic, lipidomic and transcriptomic analysis
.
Cell Mol Life Sci
.
2022
;
79
:
226
. https://doi.org/

28.

Liu
Q
,
Luo
Q
,
Ju
Y
,
Song
G.
Role of the mechanical microenvironment in cancer development and progression
.
Cancer Biol Med
.
2020
;
17
:
282
-
292
. https://doi.org/

29.

Ghani
F
,
Zubair
AC.
Discoveries from human stem cell research in space that are relevant to advancing cellular therapies on Earth
.
npj Microgravity
.
2024
;
10
:
88
. https://doi.org/

30.

Pala
R
,
Cruciani
S
,
Manca
A
, et al.
Mesenchymal stem cell behavior under microgravity: from stress response to a premature senescence
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2023
;
24
:
7753
. https://doi.org/

31.

Li
F
,
Ye
Y
,
Lei
X
,
Zhang
W.
Effects of microgravity on early embryonic development and embryonic stem cell differentiation: phenotypic characterization and potential mechanisms. Mini Review
.
Front Cell Dev Biol
.
2021
;
9
:
797167
. https://doi.org/

32.

Shaka
S
,
Carpo
N
,
Tran
V
,
Cepeda
C
,
Espinosa-Jeffrey
A.
Space microgravity alters neural stem cell division: implications for brain cancer research on earth and in space
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2022
;
23
:
14320
. https://doi.org/

33.

Baghoum
H
,
Alahmed
H
,
Hachim
M
, et al.
Simulated microgravity influences immunity-related biomarkers in lung cancer
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2022
;
24
:
155
. https://doi.org/

34.

Degan
P
,
Cortese
K
,
Pulliero
A
, et al.
Simulated microgravity effects on human adenocarcinoma alveolar epithelial cells: characterization of morphological, functional, and epigenetic parameters
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2021
;
22
:
6951
. https://doi.org/

35.

Monti
N
,
Masiello
MG
,
Proietti
S
, et al.
Survival pathways are differently affected by microgravity in normal and cancerous breast cells
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2021
;
22
:
862
. https://doi.org/

36.

Calvaruso
M
,
Militello
C
,
Minafra
L
, et al.
Biological and mechanical characterization of the Random Positioning Machine (RPM) for microgravity simulations
.
Life (Basel)
.
2021
;
11
:
1190
. https://doi.org/

37.

Strube
F
,
Infanger
M
,
Wehland
M
, et al.
Alteration of cytoskeleton morphology and gene expression in human breast cancer cells under simulated microgravity
.
Cell J
.
2020
;
22
:
106
-
114
. https://doi.org/

38.

Chen
Y
,
Xue
F
,
Russo
A
,
Wan
Y.
Proteomic analysis of extracellular vesicles derived from MDA-MB-231 cells in microgravity
.
Protein J
.
2021
;
40
:
108
-
118
. https://doi.org/

39.

Wise
PM
,
Sahana
J
,
Neviani
P
, et al.
Prolonged exposure to simulated microgravity changes release of small extracellular vesicle in breast cancer cells
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2022
;
23
:
16095
. https://doi.org/

40.

Sahana
J
,
Cortés-Sánchez
JL
,
Sandt
V
, et al.
Long-term simulation of microgravity induces changes in gene expression in breast cancer cells
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2023
;
24
:
1181
. https://doi.org/

41.

Wise
PM
,
Neviani
P
,
Riwaldt
S
, et al.
Changes in exosomal miRNA composition in thyroid cancer cells after prolonged exposure to real microgravity in space
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2021
;
22
:
12841
. https://doi.org/

42.

Wise
PM
,
Neviani
P
,
Riwaldt
S
, et al.
Changes in exosome release in thyroid cancer cells after prolonged exposure to real microgravity in space
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2021
;
22
:
12841
. https://doi.org/

43.

Al-Nedawi
K
,
Meehan
B
,
Micallef
J
, et al.
Intercellular transfer of the oncogenic receptor EGFRvIII by microvesicles derived from tumour cells
.
Nat Cell Biol
.
2008
;
10
:
619
-
624
. https://doi.org/

44.

Andreola
G
,
Rivoltini
L
,
Castelli
C
, et al.
Induction of lymphocyte apoptosis by tumor cell secretion of FasL-bearing microvesicles
.
J Exp Med
.
2002
;
195
:
1303
-
1316
. https://doi.org/

45.

Au Yeung
CL
,
Co
NN
,
Tsuruga
T
, et al.
Exosomal transfer of stroma-derived miR21 confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells through targeting APAF1
.
Nat Commun
.
2016
;
7
:
11150
. https://doi.org/

46.

Huber
V
,
Fais
S
,
Iero
M
, et al.
Human colorectal cancer cells induce T-cell death through release of proapoptotic microvesicles: role in immune escape
.
Gastroenterology
.
2005
;
128
:
1796
-
1804
. https://doi.org/

47.

Skog
J
,
Würdinger
T
,
van Rijn
S
, et al.
Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers
.
Nat Cell Biol
.
2008
;
10
:
1470
-
1476
. https://doi.org/

48.

French
KC
,
Antonyak
MA
,
Cerione
RA.
Extracellular vesicle docking at the cellular port: extracellular vesicle binding and uptake
.
Semin Cell Dev Biol
.
2017
;
67
:
48
-
55
. https://doi.org/

49.

Malla
RR
,
Pandrangi
S
,
Kumari
S
,
Gavara
MM
,
Badana
AK.
Exosomal tetraspanins as regulators of cancer progression and metastasis and novel diagnostic markers
.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol
.
2018
;
14
:
383
-
391
. https://doi.org/

50.

Pols
MS
,
Klumperman
J.
Trafficking and function of the tetraspanin CD63
.
Exp Cell Res
.
2009
;
315
:
1584
-
1592
. https://doi.org/

51.

Vences-Catalán
F
,
Rajapaksa
R
,
Srivastava
MK
, et al.
Tetraspanin CD81 promotes tumor growth and metastasis by modulating the functions of T regulatory and myeloid-derived suppressor cells
.
Cancer Res
.
2015
;
75
:
4517
-
4526
. https://doi.org/

52.

Wu
G
,
Zheng
H
,
Xu
J
, et al.
miR-429 suppresses cell growth and induces apoptosis of human thyroid cancer cell by targeting ZEB1
.
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol
.
2019
;
47
:
548
-
554
. https://doi.org/

53.

Cao
XZ
,
Bin
H
,
Zang
ZN.
MiR-128 suppresses the growth of thyroid carcinoma by negatively regulating SPHK1
.
Biomed Pharmacother
.
2019
;
109
:
1960
-
1966
. https://doi.org/

54.

Ma
S
,
Jia
W
,
Ni
S.
miR-199a-5p inhibits the progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma by targeting SNAI1
.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
.
2018
;
497
:
181
-
186
. https://doi.org/

55.

Melnik
D
,
Krüger
M
,
Schulz
H
, et al.
The CellBox-2 mission to the international space station: thyroid cancer cells in space
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2021
;
22
:
8777
. https://doi.org/

56.

Ahn
JH
,
Park
S
,
Hwang
YM
,
Choi
YS
,
Yi
JW.
Morphologic and genomic changes of thyroid cancer cell lines exposed to conditions of simulated microgravity
.
npj Microgravity
.
2024
;
10
:
8
. https://doi.org/

57.

Melnik
D
,
Sahana
J
,
Corydon
TJ
, et al.
Dexamethasone inhibits spheroid formation of thyroid cancer cells exposed to simulated microgravity
.
Cells
.
2020
;
9
:
367
. https://doi.org/

58.

Kunz-Schughart
LA.
Multicellular tumor spheroids: intermediates between monolayer culture and in vivo tumor
.
Cell Biol Int
.
1999
;
23
:
157
-
161
. https://doi.org/

59.

Yennurajalingam
S
,
Frisbee-Hume
S
,
Palmer
JL
, et al.
Reduction of cancer-related fatigue with dexamethasone: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with advanced cancer
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2013
;
31
:
3076
-
3082
. https://doi.org/

60.

Wang
LJ
,
Li
J
,
Hao
FR
, et al.
Dexamethasone suppresses the growth of human non-small cell lung cancer via inducing estrogen sulfotransferase and inactivating estrogen
.
Acta Pharmacol Sin
.
2016
;
37
:
845
-
856
. https://doi.org/

61.

Schulz
H
,
Dietrichs
D
,
Wehland
M
, et al.
In prostate cancer cells cytokines are early responders to gravitational changes occurring in parabolic flights
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2022
;
23
:
7876
. https://doi.org/

62.

Hybel
TE
,
Dietrichs
D
,
Sahana
J
, et al.
Simulated microgravity influences VEGF, MAPK, and PAM signaling in prostate cancer cells
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2020
;
21
:
1263
. https://doi.org/

63.

Nagy
JA
,
Dvorak
AM
,
Dvorak
HF.
VEGF-A and the induction of pathological angiogenesis
.
Annu Rev Pathol
.
2007
;
2
:
251
-
275
. https://doi.org/

64.

Viallard
C
,
Larrivée
B.
Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization: alternative therapeutic targets
.
Angiogenesis
.
2017
;
20
:
409
-
426
. https://doi.org/

65.

Dietrichs
D
,
Grimm
D
,
Sahana
J
, et al.
Three-dimensional growth of prostate cancer cells exposed to simulated microgravity
.
Front Cell Dev Biol
.
2022
;
10
:
841017
. https://doi.org/

66.

Chen
ZY
,
Jiang
N
,
Guo
S
, et al.
Effect of simulated microgravity on metabolism of HGC‑27 gastric cancer cells
.
Oncol Lett
.
2020
;
19
:
3439
-
3450
. https://doi.org/

67.

Rembiałkowska
N
,
Baczyńska
D
,
Dubińska-Magiera
M
, et al.
RCCS Bioreactor-based modeled microgravity affects gastric cancer cells and improves the chemotherapeutic effect
.
Membranes (Basel)
.
2022
;
12
:
448
. https://doi.org/

68.

Smit
T
,
Calitz
C
,
Willers
C
, et al.
Characterization of an alginate encapsulated LS180 spheroid model for anti-colorectal cancer compound screening
.
ACS Med Chem Lett
.
2020
;
11
:
1014
-
1021
. https://doi.org/

69.

Przystupski
D
,
Gorska
A
,
Michel
O
, et al.
Testing lab-on-a-chip technology for culturing human melanoma cells under simulated microgravity
.
Cancers (Basel)
.
2021
;
13
:
402
. https://doi.org/

70.

Singh
K
,
Gautam
PK.
Macrophage infiltration in 3D cancer spheroids to recapitulate the TME and unveil interactions within cancer cells and macrophages to modulate chemotherapeutic drug efficacy
.
BMC Cancer
.
2023
;
23
:
1201
. https://doi.org/

71.

Foty
R.
A simple hanging drop cell culture protocol for generation of 3D spheroids
.
JoVE
.
2011
;
6
:
e2720
. https://doi.org/

72.

de Andrade Peixoto
M
,
Marques Dos Reis
E
,
Marques Porto
L.
Cancer cell spheroids as a 3D model for exploring the pathobiology of vasculogenic mimicry
.
Methods Mol Biol
.
2022
;
2514
:
45
-
51
. https://doi.org/

73.

Nguyen
HT
,
Kan
EL
,
Humayun
M
, et al.
Patient-specific vascularized tumor model: blocking monocyte recruitment with multispecific antibodies targeting CCR2 and CSF-1R
.
Biomaterials
.
2025
;
312
:
122731
. https://doi.org/

74.

Surendran
V
,
Safarulla
S
,
Griffith
C
, et al.
Magnetically integrated tumor–vascular interface system to mimic pro-angiogenic endothelial dysregulations for on-chip drug testing
.
ACS Appl Mater Interf
.
2024
;
16
:
47075
-
47088
. https://doi.org/

75.

Crnogorac
MD
,
Matić
IZ
,
Damjanović
A
, et al.
3D HeLa spheroids as a model for investigating the anticancer activity of Biginelli-hybrids
.
Chem Biol Interact
.
2021
;
345
:
109565
. https://doi.org/

76.

Zanoni
M
,
Piccinini
F
,
Arienti
C
, et al.
3D tumor spheroid models for in vitro therapeutic screening: a systematic approach to enhance the biological relevance of data obtained
.
Sci Rep
.
2016
;
6
:
19103
. https://doi.org/

77.

Lao
Z
,
Kelly
CJ
,
Yang
X-Y
, et al.
Improved methods to generate spheroid cultures from tumor cells, tumor cells & fibroblasts or tumor-fragments: microenvironment, microvesicles and MiRNA
.
PLoS One
.
2015
;
10
:
e0133895
. https://doi.org/

78.

Kim
H
,
Kim
B
,
Kim
SJ
, et al.
Reconfigurable hanging drop microarray platform for on-demand preparation and analysis of spheroid array
.
Adv Healthc Mater
.
2024
;
13
:
e2400501
. https://doi.org/

79.

Tevlek
A
,
Kecili
S
,
Ozcelik
OS
,
Kulah
H
,
Tekin
HC.
Spheroid engineering in microfluidic devices
.
ACS Omega
.
2023
;
8
:
3630
-
3649
. https://doi.org/

80.

Liao
W
,
Yang
W
,
Xu
J
, et al.
Therapeutic potential of CUDC-907 (Fimepinostat) for hepatocarcinoma treatment revealed by tumor spheroids-based drug screening
.
Front Pharmacol
.
2021
;
12
:
658197
. https://doi.org/

81.

Senrung
A
,
Lalwani
S
,
Janjua
D
, et al.
3D tumor spheroids: morphological alterations a yardstick to anti-cancer drug response
.
In vitro Models
.
2023
;
2
:
219
-
248
. https://doi.org/

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.