Abstract

Introduction

Urinary incontinence (UI) has been associated with negative effects on women's sexuality. Women's sexuality and sexual function are a complex issue, and the role of UI is not completely clear.

Aim

To assess the impact of UI on female sexual function by comparing this population with a control group of continent women.

Methods

We performed a case-control study from August 2012 to September 2013. We evaluated continent and incontinent women (age range = 30–70 years) for their sexuality.

Main Outcome Measures

All patients were evaluated by anamnesis, physical examination, and self-report quality-of-life questionnaires. In addition, incontinent women underwent a 1-hour pad test. Patients without sexual activity were evaluated for the role of UI in their sexual abstinence. Sexual abstinence was defined as the absence of sexual activity for more than 6 months. All sexually active women completed the self-report Sexuality Quotient–Female Version (SQ-F) questionnaire.

Results

A total of 356 women were included in the study (incontinent, n = 243; continent, n = 113). Sexual abstinence was found in 162 women (45%). Incontinent women presented a higher prevalence (P < .001) of sexual abstinence than their counterparts (129 [53%] and 33 [29.2%], respectively). Age, marital status, and UI were found to be isolated predictive factors for more sexual abstinence in incontinent women. Sexually active women (incontinent, n = 114; continent, n = 80) presented similar demographic data. Despite a similar frequency of sexual activity, incontinent women had less sexual desire, foreplay, harmony with a partner, sexual comfort, and sexual satisfaction than their counterparts. Women with greater urinary leakage during the 1-hour pad test (weight > 11 g) had the worst sexual function (SQ-F) score.

Conclusion

Women with UI were more likely to be sexual abstinent than continent women. Furthermore, women with UI showed less sexual desire, sexual comfort, and sexual satisfaction than their counterparts despite having a similar frequency of sexual activity.

Introduction

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common disorder that affects a large number of women and their quality of life.1,2 A total of 423 million people worldwide are estimated to present with UI by 2018.3 UI can be classified based on symptoms: stress UI (SUI), urge UI (UUI), and mixed UI (MUI). To identify different types of incontinence, validated questionnaires have been developed and recommended as reproducible clinical research tools.2 Incontinent women have been reported to present urinary leakage during sexual penetration and orgasm, difficulties reaching orgasm, and less desire, lubrication, and satisfaction.4 For those women who experience leakage of urine during sexual activity, it has been suggested that UUI and SUI show a stronger association with leaking urine during orgasm and during penetration, respectively.5

Women's sexuality and sexual function are complex issues, and the role of UI is not completely clear. The effect of UI on sexuality is associated not only with leaking urine during sexual penetration or orgasm but also with several confounding variables, such as aging, pelvic surgery, hormonal influence, self-image perception, and chronic diseases, which are risk factors for sexual dysfunction and present a high prevalence in women with UI.5–8 Several attempts to control for such variables have been published.9–11 Shaw9 reported a 46% prevalence of sexual abstinence in incontinent women. Despite the high sexual abstinence rate in that study, the lack of a control group of continent women did not allow any major conclusion on the role of UI in sexual abstinence. In contrast, Tannenbaum et al10 observed that elderly women (mean age = 71 years) remained sexually active regardless of continence status in a large cross-sectional postal survey. However, the amount of urine loss, degree of SUI, and nocturnal incontinence affected sexual activity in that population. Schoenfeld et al11 evaluated sexual function in a group of German women with and without UI. They found that all women with UI were less sexually active than the healthy controls. However, the study did not present demographic data, such as marital status, educational level, and chronic diseases.

In the present study, we assessed the impact of UI on general female sexual function (desire and interest in sex, sexual excitement, harmony with the partner, comfort, satisfaction, and orgasm) by comparing incontinent women with a control group of continent women.

Methods

We performed a case-control study from August 2012 to September 2013. The university's local ethics committee approved the study, and all participants signed an informed consent. All patients included in the study were directly invited to participate. We recruited women with UI from the outpatient voiding dysfunction division of our department. Women without UI were recruited from the outpatient ophthalmology and cardiology departments at the same institution.

The inclusion criteria were women 30 to 60 years old with UI (SUI, UUI, or MUI) and without UI who voluntarily participated in the study for the case and control groups. The exclusion criteria were pregnancy, neurologic dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage II (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification), urinary tract infection in the past 3 months, and cognitive dysfunction or poor comprehension.

All patients (incontinent and continent) were assessed by anamnesis and self-report questionnaires: the World Health Organization for Quality of Life (score range = 0–100; higher scores indicate better quality of life),12 the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form (score range = 0–21; higher scores indicate greater incontinence severity),13 and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (patients with overactive bladder are those with cumulative scores > 8).14 In addition, after completion of the self-report questionnaires, all incontinent women underwent 1-hour pad test and physical examination in accord with the International Continence Society recommendation.15

Sexual abstinence was defined as the absence of any sexual activity with a partner for more than 6 months. Sexual activity was defined not only by sexual intercourse but also by other modalities, such as oral sex and mutual masturbation with a partner.

Sexually Active Women Evaluation

All sexually active patients completed the Sexuality Quotient–Female Version (SQ-F). The SQ-F consists of 10 questions, including the main domains of female sexuality: desire, arousal, orgasm, and sexual comfort. The overall score ranges from 0 to 100; those with scores lower than 62 were considered as having a risk for sexual dysfunction.16

In addition, each patient was asked two questions to evaluate urinary leakage during sexual intercourse:

  • 1.

    Do you leak urine during sexual activity?

  • 2.

    Do you believe that leaking urine affects your sexual life?

Statistical Analysis

The sample size with 95% CI and 90% power was defined based on results from previous studies and a pilot study with 50 sexually active women at our institution.16 Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative data were described as mean ± SD. The t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used for parametric and non-parametric data, respectively. Categorical variables were described as percentages and absolute values. The χ2 and Fisher tests were used, and multiple logistic regressions were performed to assess the predictive factors for sexual abstinence in incontinent women. Statistical significance was defined as a P value less than .05.

Results

We initially evaluated 400 women. The subject distribution is presented in Figure 1 and demographic data are presented in Table 1. Forty-four women did not fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria or refused to participate in the study. Of the 356 women included in the study, 162 (45%) were sexually abstinent. Sexual abstinence (P < .001) in incontinent women was statistically higher than in the continent group (129 [53%] and 33 [29.2%], respectively).

Study design and subject distribution.
Figure 1

Study design and subject distribution.

Table 1

Demographic data of study population

Incontinent (n = 243)Continent (n = 113)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD57.47 ± 10.6255.81 ± 11.31.179
Delivery, median (25–75 percentile)3 (2–5)2 (0–5).001
 Vaginal parity2 (0–3)1 (0–3).182
 Cesarean parity0 (0–1)0 (0–2).306
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD28.77 ± 5.1126.54 ± 4.65.043
Marital status, % (n)
 Single or divorced27 (67)32 (35)
 Married54 (131)53 (57).580
 Widow18 (44)15 (16)
Education level, % (n)
 Elementary school72 (177)60 (68)
 Middle school16 (38)21 (24).081
 High school11 (28)17 (21)
Comorbidities, % (n)
 Systemic arterial hypertension53 (71)61 (69).104
 Diabetes mellitus16 (40)11 (13).140
Type of incontinence, % (n)
 Stress UI28 (70)
 Urge UI12 (29)
 Mixed UI59 (144)
WHOQOL-BREF, mean ± SD54 ± 1868 ± 20.001
ICIQ-SF, mean ± SD15 ± 50<.001
OABV8, mean ± SD22 ± 95 ± 2<.001
Sexual abstinence, % (n)53 (129)29 (33)<.001
Incontinent (n = 243)Continent (n = 113)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD57.47 ± 10.6255.81 ± 11.31.179
Delivery, median (25–75 percentile)3 (2–5)2 (0–5).001
 Vaginal parity2 (0–3)1 (0–3).182
 Cesarean parity0 (0–1)0 (0–2).306
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD28.77 ± 5.1126.54 ± 4.65.043
Marital status, % (n)
 Single or divorced27 (67)32 (35)
 Married54 (131)53 (57).580
 Widow18 (44)15 (16)
Education level, % (n)
 Elementary school72 (177)60 (68)
 Middle school16 (38)21 (24).081
 High school11 (28)17 (21)
Comorbidities, % (n)
 Systemic arterial hypertension53 (71)61 (69).104
 Diabetes mellitus16 (40)11 (13).140
Type of incontinence, % (n)
 Stress UI28 (70)
 Urge UI12 (29)
 Mixed UI59 (144)
WHOQOL-BREF, mean ± SD54 ± 1868 ± 20.001
ICIQ-SF, mean ± SD15 ± 50<.001
OABV8, mean ± SD22 ± 95 ± 2<.001
Sexual abstinence, % (n)53 (129)29 (33)<.001

BMI = body mass index; ICIQ-SF = International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form; OAB = Overactive Bladder Questionnaire; UI = urinary incontinence; WHOQOL-BREF = World Health Organization for Quality of Life.

Table 1

Demographic data of study population

Incontinent (n = 243)Continent (n = 113)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD57.47 ± 10.6255.81 ± 11.31.179
Delivery, median (25–75 percentile)3 (2–5)2 (0–5).001
 Vaginal parity2 (0–3)1 (0–3).182
 Cesarean parity0 (0–1)0 (0–2).306
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD28.77 ± 5.1126.54 ± 4.65.043
Marital status, % (n)
 Single or divorced27 (67)32 (35)
 Married54 (131)53 (57).580
 Widow18 (44)15 (16)
Education level, % (n)
 Elementary school72 (177)60 (68)
 Middle school16 (38)21 (24).081
 High school11 (28)17 (21)
Comorbidities, % (n)
 Systemic arterial hypertension53 (71)61 (69).104
 Diabetes mellitus16 (40)11 (13).140
Type of incontinence, % (n)
 Stress UI28 (70)
 Urge UI12 (29)
 Mixed UI59 (144)
WHOQOL-BREF, mean ± SD54 ± 1868 ± 20.001
ICIQ-SF, mean ± SD15 ± 50<.001
OABV8, mean ± SD22 ± 95 ± 2<.001
Sexual abstinence, % (n)53 (129)29 (33)<.001
Incontinent (n = 243)Continent (n = 113)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD57.47 ± 10.6255.81 ± 11.31.179
Delivery, median (25–75 percentile)3 (2–5)2 (0–5).001
 Vaginal parity2 (0–3)1 (0–3).182
 Cesarean parity0 (0–1)0 (0–2).306
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD28.77 ± 5.1126.54 ± 4.65.043
Marital status, % (n)
 Single or divorced27 (67)32 (35)
 Married54 (131)53 (57).580
 Widow18 (44)15 (16)
Education level, % (n)
 Elementary school72 (177)60 (68)
 Middle school16 (38)21 (24).081
 High school11 (28)17 (21)
Comorbidities, % (n)
 Systemic arterial hypertension53 (71)61 (69).104
 Diabetes mellitus16 (40)11 (13).140
Type of incontinence, % (n)
 Stress UI28 (70)
 Urge UI12 (29)
 Mixed UI59 (144)
WHOQOL-BREF, mean ± SD54 ± 1868 ± 20.001
ICIQ-SF, mean ± SD15 ± 50<.001
OABV8, mean ± SD22 ± 95 ± 2<.001
Sexual abstinence, % (n)53 (129)29 (33)<.001

BMI = body mass index; ICIQ-SF = International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form; OAB = Overactive Bladder Questionnaire; UI = urinary incontinence; WHOQOL-BREF = World Health Organization for Quality of Life.

Age, marital status, and UI were found as isolated predictive factors for more sexual abstinence. The presence of comorbidities, such as systemic hypertension or diabetes mellitus, and quality-of-life questionnaire score were not predictive factors for sexual activity. These data are presented in Table 2.

Table 2

Predictive factors for sexual abstinence (in continent and incontinent women): multivariable analysis

Sexually active (n = 194)Sexually abstinent (n = 162)Odds ratio (95% CI)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD52.65 ± 10.1362.32 ± 9.541.136 (1.096–1.178)<.001
Single or divorced, % (n)19.5 (38)41.3 (64)1.689 (0.669–4.260)<.001
Married, % (n)73.3 (143)29 (45)0.168 (0.073–0.382).267
Systemic arterial hypertension, % (n)52 (104)60 (94)1.692 (0.891–3.212).108
Diabetes mellitus, % (n)13 (25)18 (28)1.053 (0.459–2.413).904
Urinary incontinence symptoms, % (n)59.6 (118)79.1 (125)2.335 (1.040–5.245).040
WHOQOL, mean ± SD73.14 ± 37.1557.4 ± 25.020.988 (0.975–1.001).061
Sexually active (n = 194)Sexually abstinent (n = 162)Odds ratio (95% CI)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD52.65 ± 10.1362.32 ± 9.541.136 (1.096–1.178)<.001
Single or divorced, % (n)19.5 (38)41.3 (64)1.689 (0.669–4.260)<.001
Married, % (n)73.3 (143)29 (45)0.168 (0.073–0.382).267
Systemic arterial hypertension, % (n)52 (104)60 (94)1.692 (0.891–3.212).108
Diabetes mellitus, % (n)13 (25)18 (28)1.053 (0.459–2.413).904
Urinary incontinence symptoms, % (n)59.6 (118)79.1 (125)2.335 (1.040–5.245).040
WHOQOL, mean ± SD73.14 ± 37.1557.4 ± 25.020.988 (0.975–1.001).061

WHOQOL = World Health Organization for Quality of Life.

Table 2

Predictive factors for sexual abstinence (in continent and incontinent women): multivariable analysis

Sexually active (n = 194)Sexually abstinent (n = 162)Odds ratio (95% CI)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD52.65 ± 10.1362.32 ± 9.541.136 (1.096–1.178)<.001
Single or divorced, % (n)19.5 (38)41.3 (64)1.689 (0.669–4.260)<.001
Married, % (n)73.3 (143)29 (45)0.168 (0.073–0.382).267
Systemic arterial hypertension, % (n)52 (104)60 (94)1.692 (0.891–3.212).108
Diabetes mellitus, % (n)13 (25)18 (28)1.053 (0.459–2.413).904
Urinary incontinence symptoms, % (n)59.6 (118)79.1 (125)2.335 (1.040–5.245).040
WHOQOL, mean ± SD73.14 ± 37.1557.4 ± 25.020.988 (0.975–1.001).061
Sexually active (n = 194)Sexually abstinent (n = 162)Odds ratio (95% CI)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD52.65 ± 10.1362.32 ± 9.541.136 (1.096–1.178)<.001
Single or divorced, % (n)19.5 (38)41.3 (64)1.689 (0.669–4.260)<.001
Married, % (n)73.3 (143)29 (45)0.168 (0.073–0.382).267
Systemic arterial hypertension, % (n)52 (104)60 (94)1.692 (0.891–3.212).108
Diabetes mellitus, % (n)13 (25)18 (28)1.053 (0.459–2.413).904
Urinary incontinence symptoms, % (n)59.6 (118)79.1 (125)2.335 (1.040–5.245).040
WHOQOL, mean ± SD73.14 ± 37.1557.4 ± 25.020.988 (0.975–1.001).061

WHOQOL = World Health Organization for Quality of Life.

Sexually Active Women Evaluation

To understand the aspects of female sexuality, we analyzed the data of sexually active women after excluding the two groups of abstinent women. Demographic data for sexually active women are presented in Table 3.

Table 3

Demographic data of sexually active women

Incontinent (n = 114)Continent (n = 80)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD52.0 ± 9.1853.2 ± 10.1.398
Delivery, median (25–75 percentile)3 (2–5)2 (1–4).002
 Vaginal parity2 (1–3)1 (0–3).127
 Cesarean parity0 (0–2)1 (0–2).926
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD29.30 ± 4.7027.21 ± 4.74.003
Marital status, % (n)
 Single or divorced13 (15)29 (23)
 Married81 (92)61 (47).009
 Widow6 (7)9 (7)
Education level, % (n)
 Elementary school69 (79)55 (44)
 Middle school17 (20)25 (19).221
 High school13 (15)21 (17)
Previous disorder, % (n)
 Systemic arterial hypertension47 (34)61 (49).039
 Diabetes mellitus13 (15)12 (10).104
Type of incontinence, % (n)
 Stress UI30 (34)
 Urge UI10 (11)
 Mixed UI60 (69)
WHOQOL-BREF, mean ± SD55 ± 1868 ± 19<.001
ICIQ-SF, mean ± SD14 ± 40<.001
OABV8, mean ± SD21 ± 94 ± 2<.001
Incontinent (n = 114)Continent (n = 80)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD52.0 ± 9.1853.2 ± 10.1.398
Delivery, median (25–75 percentile)3 (2–5)2 (1–4).002
 Vaginal parity2 (1–3)1 (0–3).127
 Cesarean parity0 (0–2)1 (0–2).926
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD29.30 ± 4.7027.21 ± 4.74.003
Marital status, % (n)
 Single or divorced13 (15)29 (23)
 Married81 (92)61 (47).009
 Widow6 (7)9 (7)
Education level, % (n)
 Elementary school69 (79)55 (44)
 Middle school17 (20)25 (19).221
 High school13 (15)21 (17)
Previous disorder, % (n)
 Systemic arterial hypertension47 (34)61 (49).039
 Diabetes mellitus13 (15)12 (10).104
Type of incontinence, % (n)
 Stress UI30 (34)
 Urge UI10 (11)
 Mixed UI60 (69)
WHOQOL-BREF, mean ± SD55 ± 1868 ± 19<.001
ICIQ-SF, mean ± SD14 ± 40<.001
OABV8, mean ± SD21 ± 94 ± 2<.001

BMI = body mass index; ICIQ-SF = International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form; OAB = Overactive Bladder Questionnaire; UI = urinary incontinence; WHOQOL-BREF = World Health Organization for Quality of Life.

Table 3

Demographic data of sexually active women

Incontinent (n = 114)Continent (n = 80)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD52.0 ± 9.1853.2 ± 10.1.398
Delivery, median (25–75 percentile)3 (2–5)2 (1–4).002
 Vaginal parity2 (1–3)1 (0–3).127
 Cesarean parity0 (0–2)1 (0–2).926
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD29.30 ± 4.7027.21 ± 4.74.003
Marital status, % (n)
 Single or divorced13 (15)29 (23)
 Married81 (92)61 (47).009
 Widow6 (7)9 (7)
Education level, % (n)
 Elementary school69 (79)55 (44)
 Middle school17 (20)25 (19).221
 High school13 (15)21 (17)
Previous disorder, % (n)
 Systemic arterial hypertension47 (34)61 (49).039
 Diabetes mellitus13 (15)12 (10).104
Type of incontinence, % (n)
 Stress UI30 (34)
 Urge UI10 (11)
 Mixed UI60 (69)
WHOQOL-BREF, mean ± SD55 ± 1868 ± 19<.001
ICIQ-SF, mean ± SD14 ± 40<.001
OABV8, mean ± SD21 ± 94 ± 2<.001
Incontinent (n = 114)Continent (n = 80)P value
Age (y), mean ± SD52.0 ± 9.1853.2 ± 10.1.398
Delivery, median (25–75 percentile)3 (2–5)2 (1–4).002
 Vaginal parity2 (1–3)1 (0–3).127
 Cesarean parity0 (0–2)1 (0–2).926
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD29.30 ± 4.7027.21 ± 4.74.003
Marital status, % (n)
 Single or divorced13 (15)29 (23)
 Married81 (92)61 (47).009
 Widow6 (7)9 (7)
Education level, % (n)
 Elementary school69 (79)55 (44)
 Middle school17 (20)25 (19).221
 High school13 (15)21 (17)
Previous disorder, % (n)
 Systemic arterial hypertension47 (34)61 (49).039
 Diabetes mellitus13 (15)12 (10).104
Type of incontinence, % (n)
 Stress UI30 (34)
 Urge UI10 (11)
 Mixed UI60 (69)
WHOQOL-BREF, mean ± SD55 ± 1868 ± 19<.001
ICIQ-SF, mean ± SD14 ± 40<.001
OABV8, mean ± SD21 ± 94 ± 2<.001

BMI = body mass index; ICIQ-SF = International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form; OAB = Overactive Bladder Questionnaire; UI = urinary incontinence; WHOQOL-BREF = World Health Organization for Quality of Life.

The 1-hour pad test showed 16 women (14%) without urinary leakage, 61 (53%) with a pad weight of 1 to 10 g, and 37 (32%) with a pad weight greater than 11 g. The correlation between severity of urinary leakage and sexual activity was evaluated. Women with greater urinary leakage by the 1-hour pad test (weight > 11 g) had the worst SQ-F scores (Figure 2).

Correlation between 1-hour pad test result and Sexuality Quotient–Female Version (SQ-F) scores.
Figure 2

Correlation between 1-hour pad test result and Sexuality Quotient–Female Version (SQ-F) scores.

Of the 114 sexually active incontinent women, 52 (45.6%) self-reported urinary leakage during sexual intercourse. The mean SQ-F score was similar in women with and without urinary leakage during sexual activity (55.72 ± 20.62 and 56.12 ± 24.09, respectively; P = .552).

Despite a similar frequency of sexual activity, incontinent women had less sexual desire, foreplay, harmony with a partner, sexual comfort, and sexual satisfaction compared with their counterparts (continent women). The SQ-F scores are listed in Table 4.

Table 4

SQ-F (total score)

DomainsIncontinent (n = 114)Continent (n = 80)P value
SQ-F, mean ± SD58 ± 21.373.3 ± 20.6.001
Intercourse frequency, median (range)4 (2–8)4 (1–8).675
Sexual desire, mean ± SD1.98 ± 1.032.44 ± 1.18.001
Foreplay, mean ± SD4.31 ± 1.825.11 ± 1.64.001
Harmony with partner, mean ± SD3.73 ± 1.664.56 ± 1.81.001
Sexual comfort, mean ± SD3.89 ± 1.534.82 ± 1.35.001
Satisfaction and orgasm, mean ± SD3.32 ± 1.924.20 ± 1.76.001
DomainsIncontinent (n = 114)Continent (n = 80)P value
SQ-F, mean ± SD58 ± 21.373.3 ± 20.6.001
Intercourse frequency, median (range)4 (2–8)4 (1–8).675
Sexual desire, mean ± SD1.98 ± 1.032.44 ± 1.18.001
Foreplay, mean ± SD4.31 ± 1.825.11 ± 1.64.001
Harmony with partner, mean ± SD3.73 ± 1.664.56 ± 1.81.001
Sexual comfort, mean ± SD3.89 ± 1.534.82 ± 1.35.001
Satisfaction and orgasm, mean ± SD3.32 ± 1.924.20 ± 1.76.001

SQ-F = Sexuality Quotient–Female Version.

Table 4

SQ-F (total score)

DomainsIncontinent (n = 114)Continent (n = 80)P value
SQ-F, mean ± SD58 ± 21.373.3 ± 20.6.001
Intercourse frequency, median (range)4 (2–8)4 (1–8).675
Sexual desire, mean ± SD1.98 ± 1.032.44 ± 1.18.001
Foreplay, mean ± SD4.31 ± 1.825.11 ± 1.64.001
Harmony with partner, mean ± SD3.73 ± 1.664.56 ± 1.81.001
Sexual comfort, mean ± SD3.89 ± 1.534.82 ± 1.35.001
Satisfaction and orgasm, mean ± SD3.32 ± 1.924.20 ± 1.76.001
DomainsIncontinent (n = 114)Continent (n = 80)P value
SQ-F, mean ± SD58 ± 21.373.3 ± 20.6.001
Intercourse frequency, median (range)4 (2–8)4 (1–8).675
Sexual desire, mean ± SD1.98 ± 1.032.44 ± 1.18.001
Foreplay, mean ± SD4.31 ± 1.825.11 ± 1.64.001
Harmony with partner, mean ± SD3.73 ± 1.664.56 ± 1.81.001
Sexual comfort, mean ± SD3.89 ± 1.534.82 ± 1.35.001
Satisfaction and orgasm, mean ± SD3.32 ± 1.924.20 ± 1.76.001

SQ-F = Sexuality Quotient–Female Version.

Discussion

The present study was an observational study designed to identify factors that might contribute to sexual dysfunction in women with UI. Few studies have compared the sexuality of incontinent and continent women with similar demographic characteristics. Our findings showed that the worst sexual dysfunction scenario, which is abandoning a sexual life, in women with UI was significantly more prevalent than in their counterparts (53% vs 29%). When we evaluated sexually active women, the UI group had less sexual desire, sexual comfort, and sexual satisfaction than their counterparts, despite having a similar frequency of sexual activity. Leaking urine during sexual intercourse was reported as an embarrassing condition by 43% of incontinent women. We also observed that the severity of urinary loss seemed to have an impact on sexuality. Women who had urinary leakage greater than 11 g (during the 1-hour pad test) had the worst SQ-F scores.

Our results showed that women with UI were more likely to present with sexual abstinence. UI is one of several variables that could interfere with sexuality.17 Our results differed from a database analysis of a large cross-sectional postal survey, which showed that women remained sexually active regardless of their continence status. The different results could be a consequence of conducting the study in an elderly population of women (mean age = 71 years).10 We found a significant difference in sexual abstinence in continent and incontinent women with a mean age of 50 years in the present study, suggesting that UI could have a greater impact on sexuality in younger women.

In our study, the demographic data of continent and incontinent women were similar. However, women with UI had a higher body mass index and more vaginal deliveries compared with the continent group. Because obesity, pregnancy, and vaginal deliveries are risk factors for UI, these variables were expected to be more prevalent in women with UI.3,8,18 It highlights the challenge of having an adequate control group in such a study. The demographic differences could be associated with weaker pelvic floor musculature as a possible cause for sexual dysfunction in women with UI and should be addressed in future studies.18,19

Aging plays an important role in diminishing sexual activity, desire, and sexuality.7,10 The Women's International Study of Health and Sexuality (WISHeS) study showed that the proportion of women with low desire increased significantly with age, although the proportion of women distressed about their low desire decreased with age.20 Similarly, we found that age was an isolated predictive factor for sexual abstinence. However, we did not evaluate the accompanying distress. Most of our subjects were in middle age. Distress about lack of sexual activity has been observed to be higher in middle-age women than in younger and older patients.20,21 In 2006, the Prevalence and Correlates of Female Sexual Disorders and Determinants of Treatment Seeking (PRESIDE) showed that the prevalence of low desire associated with distress in middle-age women (45–64 years, 12.3%) was higher than that in younger women (18–44 years, 8.9%) or older women (>65 years, 7.4%).21 The impact of age on women’s sexual function and sexuality could be associated with premenopausal and menopausal status, which is followed by a significant decrease in estrogen and testosterone levels, which is associated with a weakening sex drive. In the present study, we did not evaluate hormonal status, which could be a confounding variable.

Sexual motivation depends not only on hormonal status but also on the partner. As described by Clayton,22 if desire is not the motivating force for sexual activity, then the loss of spontaneous desire might not have a great impact on a woman's sexual life if her partner is still interested and initiates sexual activity. Furthermore, a study conducted by Schoenfeld et al11 reported the importance of having a partner to maintain sexual activity. In that study, they found that the main reason for sexual abstinence was the absence of a partner (22.4%), no sexual desire (10.2%), an impotent partner (6.4%), fear of urinary leakage during intercourse (5.4%), lack of lubrication (4.5%), and discomfort during penetration (4.2%). In our study, the partner's sexual health was not evaluated. This could negatively interfere with our results, particularly with sexual abstinence. We found that married women, regardless of being continent or incontinent, were more sexually active than single, divorced, or widowed women. This could be related to a partner initiating sexual activity. However, maintaining sexual activity did not guarantee a pleasant sexual life. Despite having a partner and maintaining a similar frequency of sexual activity, sexually active women with UI had worse scores for all sexual domains than continent women. These data strongly suggest that UI has a direct impact on female sexuality. Future research should determine the partner's sexual status and include only women with non-dysfunctional partners.

Based on our results, women with UI were less likely to be sexually active than continent women. Nevertheless, to understand the aspects of female sexuality, we performed an analysis of sexually active women and excluded abstinent women. Although continent and incontinent women had a similar frequency of sexual activity, women with UI had less sexual desire, sexual comfort, and sexual satisfaction, poorer harmony with a partner, and foreplay than their counterparts. The presence of a partner in this group could act as a protective factor in maintaining sexual activity frequency.20

It has been reported that as the severity of UI symptoms increases, the inconvenience increases and quality of life decreases.6,23 In the same way, the impact of UI on sexuality could be associated with the severity of urinary leakage. Handa et al24 reported that women with severe UI were likely to report low libido, vaginal dryness, and dyspareunia compared with women without severe incontinence. Paick et al25 reported that patient-perceived severity of UI significantly influenced health-related quality of life and sexual function. In our study, women who had urinary leakage greater than 11 g (by the 1-hour pad test) had worse SQ-F scores than their counterparts. The impact of UI on sexuality might be associated not only with urinary leakage but also with psychological insecurity and worse self-image, which could be more frequent in patients with severe UI.

Women with more severe UI could be more susceptible to urinary leakage during intercourse. Coital UI is a symptom affecting 10% to 36% of incontinent women.26–28 Although underreported, studies have shown that the presence of coital incontinence can have a significant impact on quality of life.25,26 The moment women leak urine during intercourse (penetration or orgasm) could depend on the type of incontinence (SUI, UUI, or MUI).5,26,27,29 The presence of detrusor overactivity seems to predispose to urine leakage during orgasm.27,29 In contrast, SUI would be associated with urinary leakage from straining during intercourse.5,26 However, no consensus exists on the role of the different subtypes of incontinence in sexual dysfunction. In the present study, coital UI was reported by 43% of women who did not report any direct impact on sexuality. We evaluated women with different UI subtypes. Most had MUI, which is the most common clinical presentation. A few patients with pure SUI and UUI did not allow a determination of the impact of different incontinence types on sexual function. Future studies should include a larger number of patients with pure SUI and UUI to determine the impact of specific incontinence subtypes on sexual dysfunction.

Our study has some limitations. We did not evaluate women’s hormonal status and the partner's sexual health. The studied population had a low income and/or low educational level, and these characteristics have been described as important risk factors for sexual dysfunction.30 Despite these limitations, our study clearly showed that UI had an isolated major role in the development of sexual dysfunction in women.

Conclusion

UI had a significant impact on women's sexual life. Women with UI had a higher probability of sexual abstinence compared with women without UI. Furthermore, women with UI showed less sexual desire, sexual comfort, and sexual satisfaction than their counterparts despite having a similar frequency of sexual activity.

Statement of authorship

Category 1

  • Conception and Design

    Mariana Rhein Felippe; Joao Paulo Zambon; Marcia Eli Girotti; Juliana Schulze Burti; Claudia Rosenblatt Hacad; Fernando Almeida

  • Acquisition of Data

    Mariana Rhein Felippe; Joao Paulo Zambon; Marcia Eli Girotti; Claudia Rosenblatt Hacad; Lina Cadamuro; Fernando Almeida

  • Analysis and Interpretation of Data

    Mariana Rhein Felippe; Marcia Eli Girotti; Claudia Rosenblatt Hacad; Fernando Almeida

Category 2

  • Drafting the Article

    Mariana Rhein Felippe; Joao Paulo Zambon; Marcia Eli Girotti; Juliana Schulze Burti; Claudia Rosenblatt Hacad; Lina Cadamuro; Fernando Almeida

  • Revising It for Intellectual Content

    Mariana Rhein Felippe; Joao Paulo Zambon; Marcia Eli Girotti; Juliana Schulze Burti; Claudia Rosenblatt Hacad; Lina Cadamuro; Fernando Almeida

Category 3

  • Final Approval of the Completed Article

    Mariana Rhein Felippe; Joao Paulo Zambon; Marcia Eli Girotti; Juliana Schulze Burti; Claudia Rosenblatt Hacad; Lina Cadamuro; Fernando Almeida

Funding

None.

References

1

Abrams
P.
,
Cardozo
L.
,
Fall
M.
et al.
The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society
.
Neurourol Urodyn
2002
;
21
:
167
-
178
.

2

Van Leijsen
S.A.L.
,
Evert
J.S.H.
,
Mol
B.W.J.
et al.
The correlation between clinical and urodynamic diagnosis in classifying the type of urinary incontinence in women. A systematic review of the literature
.
Neurol Urodynamics
2011
;
502
:
495
-
502
.

3

Sievert
K.
,
Amend
B.
,
Toomey
P.A.
et al.
Can we prevent incontinence?
Neurol Urodyn
2012
;
399
:
390
-
399
.

4

Lowenstein
L.
,
Gruenwald
I.
,
Itskovitz-Eldor
J.
et al.
Is there an association between female urinary incontinence and decreased genital sensation?
Neurol Urodynamics
2011
;
12
:
1291
-
1294
.

5

El-Azab
A.S.
,
Yousef
H.
,
Seifeldein
G.S.
Coital incontinence: relation to detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence
.
Neurourol Urodyn
2011
;
30
:
520
-
524
.

6

Minassian
V.
,
Devore
E.
,
Hagan
K.
et al.
Severity of urinary incontinence and effect on quality of life in women by incontinence type
.
Obstet Gynecol
2013
;
121
:
1083
-
1090
.

7

Ratner
E.S.
,
Erekson
E.
,
Minkin
M.J.
et al.
Sexual satisfaction in the elderly female population: a special focus on women with gynecologic pathology
.
Maturitas
2011
;
70
:
210
-
215
.

8

Fabbri
F.
,
Colombo
R.
,
Guazzoni
G.
et al.
Sexual dysfunction is common in women with lower urinaryt ract symptoms and urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study
.
Eur Urol
2004
;
45
:
642
-
648
.

9

Shaw
C.
A systematic review of the literature on the prevalence of sexual impairment in women with urinary incontinence and the prevalence of urinary leakage during sexual activity
.
Eur Urol
2002
;
42
:
432
-
440
.

10

Tannenbaum
C.
,
Corcos
J.
,
Assalian
P.
The relationship between sexual activity and urinary incontinence in older women
.
Am Geriatr Soc
2006
;
54
:
1220
-
1224
.

11

Schoenfeld
M.
,
Fuermetz
A.
,
Muenster
M.
et al.
Sexuality in German urogynecological patients and healthy controls: is there a difference with respect to the diagnosis?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
2013
;
170
:
567
-
570
.

12

WHOQol Group
.
The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (the WHOQoL)
.
Orley
J.
,
Kuyken
W.
.
Quality of life assessment: international perspectives
Heigelberg
:
Springer Verlag
,
1994
.
41
-
60
.

13

Timmermans
L.
,
Falez
F.
,
Me
C.
et al.
Validation of use of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Urinary Incontinence–Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) for impairment rating: a transversal retrospective study of 120 patients
.
Neurol Urodyn
2013
;
32
:
974
-
979
.

14

Coyne
K.
,
Revicki
D.
,
Hunt
T.
et al.
Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire: the OAB-q
.
Qual Life Res
2002
;
11
:
563
-
574
.

15

Machold
S.
,
Olbert
P.J.
,
Hegele
A.
et al.
Comparison of a 20-min pad test with the 1-hour pad test of the international continence society to evaluate post-prostatectomy incontinence
.
Urol Int
2009
;
83
:
27
-
32
.

16

Abdo
C.H.N.
Development and validation of female sexual quotient—a questionnaire to assess female sexual function
.
Rev Bras Med
2006
;
63
:
477
-
482
.

17

Lewis
R.W.
,
Fugl-Meyer
K.S.
,
Corona
G.
et al.
Definitions/epidemiology/risk factors for sexual dysfunction
.
J Sex Med
2010
;
7
:
1598
-
1607
.

18

Stothers
L.
,
Friedman
B.
Risk factors for the development of stress urinary incontinence in women
.
Curr Urol Rep
2011
;
12
:
363
-
369
.

19

Sacomori
C.
,
Cardoso
F.
Predictors of improvement in sexual function of women with urinary incontinence after treatment with pelvic floor exercises: a secondary analysis
.
J Sex Med
2015
;
12
:
746
-
755
.

20

Leiblum
S.R.
,
Koochaki
P.E.
,
Rodenberg
C.A.
et al.
Hypoactive disorder in postmenopausal women: US results from the Women's International Study of Health and Sexuality (WISHeS)
.
Menopause
2006
;
13
:
46
-
56
.

21

Shifren
J.L.
,
Monz
B.U.
,
Russo
P.A.
et al.
Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates
.
Obstet Gynecol
2008
;
112
:
970
-
978
.

22

Clayton
A.H.
The pathophysiology of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women
.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
2010
;
110
:
7
-
11
.

23

Sensoy
N.
,
Dogan
N.
,
Ozek
B.
et al.
Urinary incontinence in women: prevalence rates, risk factors and impact on quality of life
.
Pak J Med Sci
2013
;
29
:
818
-
822
.

24

Handa
V.L.
,
Harvey
L.
,
Cundiff
G.W.
et al.
Sexual function among women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
2004
;
191
:
751
-
756
.

25

Paick
J.
,
Cho
M.C.
,
Oh
S.
et al.
Influence of self-perceived incontinence severity on quality of life and sexual function in women with urinary incontinence
.
Neurol Urodyn
2007
;
835
:
828
-
835
.

26

Jha
S.
,
Strelley
K.
,
Radley
S.
Incontinence during intercourse: myths unravelled
.
Int Urogynecol J
2012
;
23
:
633
-
637
.

27

Serati
M.
,
Salvatore
S.
,
Uccella
S.
et al.
Urinary incontinence at orgasm: relation to detrusor overactivity and treatment efficacy
.
Eur Urol
2008
;
54
:
911
-
917
.

28

Moore
C.K.
The impact of urinary incontinence and its treatment on female sexual function
.
Curr Urol Rep
2010
;
11
:
299
-
303
.

29

Nilsson
M.
,
Lalos
O.
,
Lindkvist
H.
,
Lalos
A.
How do urinary incontinence and urgency affect women's sexual life?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
2011
;
90
:
621
-
628
.

30

Abdo
C.H.N.
,
Oliveira
W.M.
,
Moreira
E.D.
et al.
Prevalence of sexual dysfunctions and correlated conditions in a sample of Brazilian women—results of the Brazilian Study on Sexual Behavior (BSSB)
.
Int J Impot Res
2004
;
16
:
160
-
166
.

Author notes

Conflicts of Interest: Authors report no conflicts of interest.