-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Sara Comdühr, Alexander Dübbers, Lars Tharun, Hanna Graßhoff, John Stone, Silke Pitann, Gabriela Riemekasten, Peter Lamprecht, Immunological changes and prevention of disease progression through elotuzumab therapy in refractory IgG4-related sclerosing mesenteritis, Rheumatology, Volume 61, Issue 11, November 2022, Pages e334–e336, https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac302
- Share Icon Share
Elotuzumab therapy stopped disease progression and resulted in immunological changes in refractory IgG4-related sclerosing mesenteritis.
Dear Editor, IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a chronic fibroinflammatory condition characterized by tumefactive lesions, dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates and abundant IgG4-bearing plasma cells. IgG4-RD comprises a multifaceted spectrum commonly affecting the pancreato-hepatobiliary tract, major salivary glands, lacrimal gland, retroperitoneum, kidneys, lungs and aorta. IgG4-related sclerosing mesenteritis (IgG4-RSM) is a rare manifestation typically occurring in the small bowel mesentery. Extra-mesenteric disease is unusual in patients with IgG4-RSM. The differential diagnosis of IgG4-RD includes myofibroblastic, inflammatory and neoplastic conditions [1].
Here we report on a 67-year-old Caucasian female suffering from abdominal pain due to biopsy-proven IgG4-RSM (supplementary Fig. S1, available at Rheumatology online) [1]. All laboratory findings including serum IgG4 concentration were within normal range. Her disease proved to be refractory to glucocorticoid therapy alone, and glucocorticoid in combination with thalidomide, rituximab and CYC, respectively. Abdominal CT imaging disclosed progression of soft-tissues masses encasing the superior mesenteric artery. Because cytotoxic CD4+SLAMF7+ innate-like T cells and plasmablasts are considered to be key drivers of IgG4-RD pathology, the patient was switched to a 3-month course of treatment with the monoclonal anti-SLAMF7 antibody elotuzumab. The patient provided informed consent for the compassionate use of elotuzumab. We applied an elotuzumab therapy protocol established for refractory multiple myeloma [2]. The patient received i.v. elotuzumab (10 mg per kilogram of body weight) every week for a total of 8 weeks, followed by biweekly elotuzumab infusions with the same dosage until week 12. The cumulative dose of elotuzumab during the treatment period was 6 g. The patient experienced no adverse events. A follow-up CT showed no progression of the mass-forming lesions in the abdomen. The patient’s disease has remained stable for 9 months.
We followed changes within the peripheral blood cellular compartment during the 12-week period of elotuzumab therapy by flow cytometric analysis. Staining of cellular surface markers with optimized concentrations of fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (Biolegend, San Diego, California, USA) was performed using freshly collected whole blood as described earlier [3]. Stained samples were analysed on a CytoflexS cytometer using CytExpert software (Beckmann Coulter, Brea, California, USA) for data acquisition and FlowJo V.10 software (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) for analysis. A patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and a healthy donor served as controls. Circulating B cells were not analysed due to low numbers. During the 12-week period, we observed a decrease of the frequency of SLAMF7+ cells within the neutrophil and monocyte population, and an increase within the lymphocyte population. We found a persistent expansion of T cells lacking CD28 expression within the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations. The vast majority of CD28– T cells displayed SLAMF7 expression, but lacked CD27. The percentage of CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) T cells was also increased. Nearly all DP cells were SLAMF7+. By contrast, the proportion of CD4–CD8– double-negative T cells was minimal (1%). Notably, we observed an increase in the frequency of CD3+CD56+ NKT and CD3–CD56+ NK cells during elotuzumab therapy. Virtually all NKT and NK cells expressed SLAMF7 (Table 1 and supplementary Fig. S2, available at Rheumatology online).
Cell counts and frequencies of cellular subsets in peripheral blood in the patient and controls
Cell counts (normal range) and frequencies (%) . | IgG4-RSM . | HD . | GPA . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline . | Week 6 . | Week 12 . | |||
Neutrophil cell count (1500–7700/µl) | 7990 | 8740 | 7810 | 5130 | 3930 |
% of SLAMF7+ neutrophils | 61 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 54 |
SLAMF7+ neutrophil cell count/µl | 4874 | 1404 | 781 | 513 | 2122 |
Monocyte cell count (100–1000/µl) | 900 | 1230 | 860 | 780 | 980 |
% of SLAMF7+ monocytes | 86 | 43 | 49 | 38 | 73 |
SLAMF7+ monocyte cell count/µl | 774 | 529 | 421 | 296 | 715 |
Lymphocyte cell count (1100–4000/µl) | 1280 | 1560 | 1230 | 2890 | 1900 |
% of SLAMF7+ lymphocytes | 36 | 60 | 78 | 35 | 10 |
SLAMF7+ lymphocyte cell count/µl | 461 | 936 | 959 | 1011 | 190 |
CD3+ T cell count (700–2100/µl) | 1.097 | 995 | 1174 | 863 | 1177 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3+ T cell population | 65 | 69 | 81 | 24 | 4 |
CD3+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 713 | 687 | 950 | 207 | 47 |
CD4+ T cell count (300–1400/µl) | 714 | 697 | 815 | 649 | 472 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+ T cell population | 47 | 30 | 63 | 4 | 22 |
CD4+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 336 | 209 | 513 | 26 | 104 |
% of CD28+ cells within CD4+ T cell population | 71 | 89 | 59 | 97 | 87 |
% of CD27– cells within CD4+CD28+ T cell population | 23 | 23 | 36 | 4 | 9 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD28+ T cell population | 24 | 21 | 40 | 4 | 13 |
% of CD28– cells within CD4+ T cell population | 29 | 11 | 41 | 3 | 13 |
% of CD27– cells within CD4+CD28– T cell population | 99 | 99 | 99 | 5 | 96 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD28– T cell population | 99 | 91 | 96 | 13 | 91 |
CD8+ T cell cell count (200–900/µl) | 391 | 329 | 399 | 216 | 683 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+ T cell population | 96 | 96 | 98 | 65 | 92 |
CD8+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 375 | 315 | 391 | 140 | 638 |
% of CD28+ cells within CD8+ T cell population | 27 | 33 | 21 | 86 | 15 |
% of CD27– cells within CD8+CD28+ T cell population | 14 | 18 | 20 | 5 | 11 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+CD28+ T cell population | 82 | 89 | 94 | 60 | 47 |
% of CD28– cells within CD8+ T cell population | 73 | 67 | 79 | 14 | 85 |
% of CD27– cells within CD8+CD28– T cell population | 86 | 83 | 83 | 40 | 91 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+CD28– T cell population | 100 | 99 | 98 | 96 | 99 |
% of CD4+CD8+ DP cells within CD3+ T cell population | 6 | 23 | 13 | 1 | 2 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD8+ DP T cell population | 98 | 99 | 99 | 22 | 70 |
% of CD56+ cells within CD3+ T cell population | 19 | 26 | 30 | 5 | 18 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3+CD56+ NKT cell population | 99 | 99 | 99 | 97 | 99 |
CD3+CD56+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 206 | 256 | 350 | 40 | 209 |
CD19+ B cell cell count (100–500/µl) | 7 | 8 | 10 | 128 | 1 |
CD3-CD56+ NK cells cell count (90–600/µl) | 101 | 57 | 97 | 150 | 156 |
% of CD56+ cells within CD3– cell population | 8 | 31 | 59 | 52 | 50 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3–CD56+ NK cell population | 98 | 99 | 98 | 98 | 99 |
CD3–CD56+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 7 | 16 | 56 | 77 | 76 |
Cell counts (normal range) and frequencies (%) . | IgG4-RSM . | HD . | GPA . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline . | Week 6 . | Week 12 . | |||
Neutrophil cell count (1500–7700/µl) | 7990 | 8740 | 7810 | 5130 | 3930 |
% of SLAMF7+ neutrophils | 61 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 54 |
SLAMF7+ neutrophil cell count/µl | 4874 | 1404 | 781 | 513 | 2122 |
Monocyte cell count (100–1000/µl) | 900 | 1230 | 860 | 780 | 980 |
% of SLAMF7+ monocytes | 86 | 43 | 49 | 38 | 73 |
SLAMF7+ monocyte cell count/µl | 774 | 529 | 421 | 296 | 715 |
Lymphocyte cell count (1100–4000/µl) | 1280 | 1560 | 1230 | 2890 | 1900 |
% of SLAMF7+ lymphocytes | 36 | 60 | 78 | 35 | 10 |
SLAMF7+ lymphocyte cell count/µl | 461 | 936 | 959 | 1011 | 190 |
CD3+ T cell count (700–2100/µl) | 1.097 | 995 | 1174 | 863 | 1177 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3+ T cell population | 65 | 69 | 81 | 24 | 4 |
CD3+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 713 | 687 | 950 | 207 | 47 |
CD4+ T cell count (300–1400/µl) | 714 | 697 | 815 | 649 | 472 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+ T cell population | 47 | 30 | 63 | 4 | 22 |
CD4+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 336 | 209 | 513 | 26 | 104 |
% of CD28+ cells within CD4+ T cell population | 71 | 89 | 59 | 97 | 87 |
% of CD27– cells within CD4+CD28+ T cell population | 23 | 23 | 36 | 4 | 9 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD28+ T cell population | 24 | 21 | 40 | 4 | 13 |
% of CD28– cells within CD4+ T cell population | 29 | 11 | 41 | 3 | 13 |
% of CD27– cells within CD4+CD28– T cell population | 99 | 99 | 99 | 5 | 96 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD28– T cell population | 99 | 91 | 96 | 13 | 91 |
CD8+ T cell cell count (200–900/µl) | 391 | 329 | 399 | 216 | 683 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+ T cell population | 96 | 96 | 98 | 65 | 92 |
CD8+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 375 | 315 | 391 | 140 | 638 |
% of CD28+ cells within CD8+ T cell population | 27 | 33 | 21 | 86 | 15 |
% of CD27– cells within CD8+CD28+ T cell population | 14 | 18 | 20 | 5 | 11 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+CD28+ T cell population | 82 | 89 | 94 | 60 | 47 |
% of CD28– cells within CD8+ T cell population | 73 | 67 | 79 | 14 | 85 |
% of CD27– cells within CD8+CD28– T cell population | 86 | 83 | 83 | 40 | 91 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+CD28– T cell population | 100 | 99 | 98 | 96 | 99 |
% of CD4+CD8+ DP cells within CD3+ T cell population | 6 | 23 | 13 | 1 | 2 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD8+ DP T cell population | 98 | 99 | 99 | 22 | 70 |
% of CD56+ cells within CD3+ T cell population | 19 | 26 | 30 | 5 | 18 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3+CD56+ NKT cell population | 99 | 99 | 99 | 97 | 99 |
CD3+CD56+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 206 | 256 | 350 | 40 | 209 |
CD19+ B cell cell count (100–500/µl) | 7 | 8 | 10 | 128 | 1 |
CD3-CD56+ NK cells cell count (90–600/µl) | 101 | 57 | 97 | 150 | 156 |
% of CD56+ cells within CD3– cell population | 8 | 31 | 59 | 52 | 50 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3–CD56+ NK cell population | 98 | 99 | 98 | 98 | 99 |
CD3–CD56+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 7 | 16 | 56 | 77 | 76 |
IgG4-RSM: IgG4-related sclerosing mesenteritis; GPA: granulomatosis with polyangiitis; HD: healthy donor.
Cell counts and frequencies of cellular subsets in peripheral blood in the patient and controls
Cell counts (normal range) and frequencies (%) . | IgG4-RSM . | HD . | GPA . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline . | Week 6 . | Week 12 . | |||
Neutrophil cell count (1500–7700/µl) | 7990 | 8740 | 7810 | 5130 | 3930 |
% of SLAMF7+ neutrophils | 61 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 54 |
SLAMF7+ neutrophil cell count/µl | 4874 | 1404 | 781 | 513 | 2122 |
Monocyte cell count (100–1000/µl) | 900 | 1230 | 860 | 780 | 980 |
% of SLAMF7+ monocytes | 86 | 43 | 49 | 38 | 73 |
SLAMF7+ monocyte cell count/µl | 774 | 529 | 421 | 296 | 715 |
Lymphocyte cell count (1100–4000/µl) | 1280 | 1560 | 1230 | 2890 | 1900 |
% of SLAMF7+ lymphocytes | 36 | 60 | 78 | 35 | 10 |
SLAMF7+ lymphocyte cell count/µl | 461 | 936 | 959 | 1011 | 190 |
CD3+ T cell count (700–2100/µl) | 1.097 | 995 | 1174 | 863 | 1177 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3+ T cell population | 65 | 69 | 81 | 24 | 4 |
CD3+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 713 | 687 | 950 | 207 | 47 |
CD4+ T cell count (300–1400/µl) | 714 | 697 | 815 | 649 | 472 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+ T cell population | 47 | 30 | 63 | 4 | 22 |
CD4+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 336 | 209 | 513 | 26 | 104 |
% of CD28+ cells within CD4+ T cell population | 71 | 89 | 59 | 97 | 87 |
% of CD27– cells within CD4+CD28+ T cell population | 23 | 23 | 36 | 4 | 9 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD28+ T cell population | 24 | 21 | 40 | 4 | 13 |
% of CD28– cells within CD4+ T cell population | 29 | 11 | 41 | 3 | 13 |
% of CD27– cells within CD4+CD28– T cell population | 99 | 99 | 99 | 5 | 96 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD28– T cell population | 99 | 91 | 96 | 13 | 91 |
CD8+ T cell cell count (200–900/µl) | 391 | 329 | 399 | 216 | 683 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+ T cell population | 96 | 96 | 98 | 65 | 92 |
CD8+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 375 | 315 | 391 | 140 | 638 |
% of CD28+ cells within CD8+ T cell population | 27 | 33 | 21 | 86 | 15 |
% of CD27– cells within CD8+CD28+ T cell population | 14 | 18 | 20 | 5 | 11 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+CD28+ T cell population | 82 | 89 | 94 | 60 | 47 |
% of CD28– cells within CD8+ T cell population | 73 | 67 | 79 | 14 | 85 |
% of CD27– cells within CD8+CD28– T cell population | 86 | 83 | 83 | 40 | 91 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+CD28– T cell population | 100 | 99 | 98 | 96 | 99 |
% of CD4+CD8+ DP cells within CD3+ T cell population | 6 | 23 | 13 | 1 | 2 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD8+ DP T cell population | 98 | 99 | 99 | 22 | 70 |
% of CD56+ cells within CD3+ T cell population | 19 | 26 | 30 | 5 | 18 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3+CD56+ NKT cell population | 99 | 99 | 99 | 97 | 99 |
CD3+CD56+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 206 | 256 | 350 | 40 | 209 |
CD19+ B cell cell count (100–500/µl) | 7 | 8 | 10 | 128 | 1 |
CD3-CD56+ NK cells cell count (90–600/µl) | 101 | 57 | 97 | 150 | 156 |
% of CD56+ cells within CD3– cell population | 8 | 31 | 59 | 52 | 50 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3–CD56+ NK cell population | 98 | 99 | 98 | 98 | 99 |
CD3–CD56+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 7 | 16 | 56 | 77 | 76 |
Cell counts (normal range) and frequencies (%) . | IgG4-RSM . | HD . | GPA . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline . | Week 6 . | Week 12 . | |||
Neutrophil cell count (1500–7700/µl) | 7990 | 8740 | 7810 | 5130 | 3930 |
% of SLAMF7+ neutrophils | 61 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 54 |
SLAMF7+ neutrophil cell count/µl | 4874 | 1404 | 781 | 513 | 2122 |
Monocyte cell count (100–1000/µl) | 900 | 1230 | 860 | 780 | 980 |
% of SLAMF7+ monocytes | 86 | 43 | 49 | 38 | 73 |
SLAMF7+ monocyte cell count/µl | 774 | 529 | 421 | 296 | 715 |
Lymphocyte cell count (1100–4000/µl) | 1280 | 1560 | 1230 | 2890 | 1900 |
% of SLAMF7+ lymphocytes | 36 | 60 | 78 | 35 | 10 |
SLAMF7+ lymphocyte cell count/µl | 461 | 936 | 959 | 1011 | 190 |
CD3+ T cell count (700–2100/µl) | 1.097 | 995 | 1174 | 863 | 1177 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3+ T cell population | 65 | 69 | 81 | 24 | 4 |
CD3+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 713 | 687 | 950 | 207 | 47 |
CD4+ T cell count (300–1400/µl) | 714 | 697 | 815 | 649 | 472 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+ T cell population | 47 | 30 | 63 | 4 | 22 |
CD4+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 336 | 209 | 513 | 26 | 104 |
% of CD28+ cells within CD4+ T cell population | 71 | 89 | 59 | 97 | 87 |
% of CD27– cells within CD4+CD28+ T cell population | 23 | 23 | 36 | 4 | 9 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD28+ T cell population | 24 | 21 | 40 | 4 | 13 |
% of CD28– cells within CD4+ T cell population | 29 | 11 | 41 | 3 | 13 |
% of CD27– cells within CD4+CD28– T cell population | 99 | 99 | 99 | 5 | 96 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD28– T cell population | 99 | 91 | 96 | 13 | 91 |
CD8+ T cell cell count (200–900/µl) | 391 | 329 | 399 | 216 | 683 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+ T cell population | 96 | 96 | 98 | 65 | 92 |
CD8+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 375 | 315 | 391 | 140 | 638 |
% of CD28+ cells within CD8+ T cell population | 27 | 33 | 21 | 86 | 15 |
% of CD27– cells within CD8+CD28+ T cell population | 14 | 18 | 20 | 5 | 11 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+CD28+ T cell population | 82 | 89 | 94 | 60 | 47 |
% of CD28– cells within CD8+ T cell population | 73 | 67 | 79 | 14 | 85 |
% of CD27– cells within CD8+CD28– T cell population | 86 | 83 | 83 | 40 | 91 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD8+CD28– T cell population | 100 | 99 | 98 | 96 | 99 |
% of CD4+CD8+ DP cells within CD3+ T cell population | 6 | 23 | 13 | 1 | 2 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+CD8+ DP T cell population | 98 | 99 | 99 | 22 | 70 |
% of CD56+ cells within CD3+ T cell population | 19 | 26 | 30 | 5 | 18 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3+CD56+ NKT cell population | 99 | 99 | 99 | 97 | 99 |
CD3+CD56+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 206 | 256 | 350 | 40 | 209 |
CD19+ B cell cell count (100–500/µl) | 7 | 8 | 10 | 128 | 1 |
CD3-CD56+ NK cells cell count (90–600/µl) | 101 | 57 | 97 | 150 | 156 |
% of CD56+ cells within CD3– cell population | 8 | 31 | 59 | 52 | 50 |
% of SLAMF7+ cells within CD3–CD56+ NK cell population | 98 | 99 | 98 | 98 | 99 |
CD3–CD56+SLAMF7+ cell count/µl | 7 | 16 | 56 | 77 | 76 |
IgG4-RSM: IgG4-related sclerosing mesenteritis; GPA: granulomatosis with polyangiitis; HD: healthy donor.
In this report, we followed the clinical course and changes within the peripheral blood cellular compartment in a patient with refractory IgG4-RSM treated with elotuzumab. Disease progression was stopped. Persistence of peripheral B cell depletion suggested possible additional lasting effects of previous immunosuppressive therapies. Elotuzumab does not bind to the same epitope recognized by the anti-SLAMF7 antibody clone 162.1 (Biolegend), allowing unaffected cellular staining and flow cytometric analysis [4]. The cellular compartments were affected differentially by elotuzumab therapy, with a decrease of SLAMF7+ cell fractions within the circulating neutrophil and monocyte populations and an increase within the lymphocyte population. We found a persistent expansion of CD28–CD27–SLAMF7+ cells within CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations, similar to that previously observed in IgG4-RD with multi-organ involvement [5, 6]. SLAMF7 expressing CD4+CD28–CD27– and CD8+CD28–CD27– T cells are a subset of innate-like T cells displaying cytotoxicity and cytokine production [6]. In addition, we observed an increase in the percentage of CD4+CD8+ DP T cells expressing SLAMF7, which remained unaffected by elotuzumab therapy. Expansion of circulating CD4+CD28–CD27– and CD8+CD28–CD27– innate-like T cells and CD4+CD8+ DP T cells is a hallmark of various infections and autoimmune diseases including GPA and has been linked to inflammation and autoimmunity [3, 7]. Finally, we disclosed an increase in the frequency of SLAMF7 expressing CD3+CD56+ NKT and CD3–CD56+ NK cells during elotuzumab therapy in our patient. Elotuzumab promotes NK cell activation, resulting in enhanced plasma cell killing [8]. Thus, changes in NKT and NK cell frequencies suggest an immunological response induced by elotuzumab.
In conclusion, refractory IgG4-RSM is a therapeutic challenge. The findings reported herein are descriptive and require further evaluation. Anecdotal reports fall short of demonstrating generalizable cause–effect relationships. However, the presented findings are suggestive of a therapeutic elotuzumab-induced effect with prevention of disease progression and an immunological response. Elotuzumab could be a therapeutic option in IgG4-RD and is currently being tested in a two-part multicentre clinical trial in the USA (NCT04918147).
Funding: No specific funding was received from any bodies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors to carry out the work described in this article.
Disclosure statement: J.S. received support for NCT04918147 ‘Elotuzumab in Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD)’. S.C., A.D., L.T., H.G., S.P., G.R. and P.L. have declared no conflicts of interest.
Consent: Informed consent was received from the patient.
Data availability statement
All data are incorporated into the article and its online supplementary material.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available at Rheumatology online.
Comments