-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Robert Landewe, Desiree van der Heijde, Maxime Dougados, Xenofon Baraliakos, Filip Van den Bosch, Karl Gaffney, Bengt Hoepken, Karen Thomas, Lianne S Gensler, E098 Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with certolizumab pegol: results from the 48-week run-in part of a 96-week study (NCT02505542), Rheumatology, Volume 58, Issue Supplement_3, April 2019, kez110.096, https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez110.096
- Share Icon Share
Background: C-OPTIMISE is the first trial to evaluate whether certolizumab pegol (CZP) can be reduced/discontinued in patients with radiographic (r) axSpA/ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic (nr) axSpA achieving sustained remission after 48 weeks’ treatment. Here, we report interim efficacy and safety data for both subpopulations from the ongoing trial.
Methods: Up to week 48, C-OPTIMISE (NCT02505542) was open-label (Part A), followed by 48-week parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment to week 96 (Part B). Patients with adult-onset axSpA of < 5 years’ duration, fulfilling ASAS classification criteria, were recruited. Part A: patients received CZP (400mg at weeks 0/2/4, then 200mg Q2W); patients achieving sustained remission (ASDAS<1.3 at week 32 and <2.1 at week 36 [or vice versa], and <1.3 at week 48) were eligible for Part B. Primary outcome (not reported): percentage of patients in Part B not experiencing a flare. Missing values were imputed using non-responder imputation (NRI) and last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Results: Part A: of 736 patients (Table 1), 43.9% achieved sustained remission (r-axSpA/AS: 42.8%; nr-axSpA: 45.3%; NRI). At baseline, 98.5% patients had high/very high disease activity (ASDAS⩾2.1); at week 48, 52.7% (r-axSpA/AS: 52.6%; nr-axSpA: 52.9%) had inactive disease (ASDAS<1.3; LOCF). The treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rate/100 patient-years’ exposure was 224.2; 3.9% patients discontinued CZP due to TEAEs. No new safety signal was identified.
Conclusion: These results show that similar and substantial proportions of patients with r-axSpA/AS and nr-axSpA achieved sustained remission during 48 weeks’ CZP treatment. No new safety signal was identified.
Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | axSpA (n = 736) . | r-axSpA/AS (n = 407) . | nr-axSpA (n = 329) . | |||
Baseline Characteristics | ||||||
Age (years), mean (SD) | 32.9 (7.0) | 33.7 (6.8) | 32.1 (7.1) | |||
Male, n (%) | 513 (69.7) | 318 (78.1) | 195 (59.3) | |||
Symptom duration (years), mean (SD) [a] | 2.2 (1.7) | 2.5 (1.8) | 1.8 (1.6) | |||
HLA-B27 positive, n (%) | 597 (81.1) | 354 (87.0) | 243 (73.9) | |||
Sacroiliitis on imaging, n (%) [b] | 691 (93.9) | 401 (98.5) | 290 (88.1) | |||
Prior anti-TNF treatment, n (%) | 31 (4.2) | 20 (4.9) | 11 (3.3) | |||
Clinical Outcomes | ||||||
% | BL | Wk48 (NRI) | BL | Wk48 (NRI) | BL | Wk48 (NRI) |
ASAS20 | - | 79.6 | - | 79.9 | - | 79.3 |
ASAS40 | - | 72.0 | - | 71.3 | - | 72.9 |
ASAS PR | - | 57.3 | - | 55.8 | - | 59.3 |
BASDAI 50 | - | 71.7 | - | 71.3 | - | 72.3 |
Mean [c] | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) |
ASDAS | 3.7 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 1.5 |
HDA/VHDA,% | 98.5 | 24.7† | 98.5 | 25.8 | 98.5 | 23.2‡ |
ID, % | - | 52.7† | - | 52.6 | - | 52.9‡ |
CII, % [d] | - | 76.5 | - | 78.6 | - | 73.9 |
MI, % [d] | - | 56.3 | - | 58.7 | - | 53.2 |
BASDAI | 6.7 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.2 |
BASFI | 5.3 | 1.7 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 5.1 | 1.6 |
BASMI | 3.1 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.9 |
Nocturnal back pain | 6.9 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 1.8 | 6.8 | 1.8 |
Fatigue | 7.1 | 2.6 | 7.1 | 2.5 | 7.1 | 2.6 |
CRP (mg/L), median | 7.8 | 2.0 | 10.7 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | axSpA (n = 736) . | r-axSpA/AS (n = 407) . | nr-axSpA (n = 329) . | |||
Baseline Characteristics | ||||||
Age (years), mean (SD) | 32.9 (7.0) | 33.7 (6.8) | 32.1 (7.1) | |||
Male, n (%) | 513 (69.7) | 318 (78.1) | 195 (59.3) | |||
Symptom duration (years), mean (SD) [a] | 2.2 (1.7) | 2.5 (1.8) | 1.8 (1.6) | |||
HLA-B27 positive, n (%) | 597 (81.1) | 354 (87.0) | 243 (73.9) | |||
Sacroiliitis on imaging, n (%) [b] | 691 (93.9) | 401 (98.5) | 290 (88.1) | |||
Prior anti-TNF treatment, n (%) | 31 (4.2) | 20 (4.9) | 11 (3.3) | |||
Clinical Outcomes | ||||||
% | BL | Wk48 (NRI) | BL | Wk48 (NRI) | BL | Wk48 (NRI) |
ASAS20 | - | 79.6 | - | 79.9 | - | 79.3 |
ASAS40 | - | 72.0 | - | 71.3 | - | 72.9 |
ASAS PR | - | 57.3 | - | 55.8 | - | 59.3 |
BASDAI 50 | - | 71.7 | - | 71.3 | - | 72.3 |
Mean [c] | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) |
ASDAS | 3.7 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 1.5 |
HDA/VHDA,% | 98.5 | 24.7† | 98.5 | 25.8 | 98.5 | 23.2‡ |
ID, % | - | 52.7† | - | 52.6 | - | 52.9‡ |
CII, % [d] | - | 76.5 | - | 78.6 | - | 73.9 |
MI, % [d] | - | 56.3 | - | 58.7 | - | 53.2 |
BASDAI | 6.7 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.2 |
BASFI | 5.3 | 1.7 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 5.1 | 1.6 |
BASMI | 3.1 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.9 |
Nocturnal back pain | 6.9 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 1.8 | 6.8 | 1.8 |
Fatigue | 7.1 | 2.6 | 7.1 | 2.5 | 7.1 | 2.6 |
CRP (mg/L), median | 7.8 | 2.0 | 10.7 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Table Footnote: [a] Time since diagnosis of disease. [b] MRI/Xray. [c] Unless stated otherwise. [d] NRI. †n=734. ‡n=327. ASAS20/40: ≥20%/≥40% improvement in assessment of spondyloarthritis international society response criteria; PR: Partial Remission; ASDAS: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BASDAI 50: ≥50% improvement in BASDAI; BASFI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; BASMI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index; CII: Clinically Important Improvement (RFB ≥1.1); CRP: C-reactive protein; CZP: certolizumab pegol; HDA/VHDA: High/Very High Disease Activity (ASDAS≥2.1); ID: Inactive Disease (ASDAS <1.3); LOCF: last observation carried forward; MI: ASDAS Major Improvement (RFB ≥2.0); (n)r: (non)radiographic; NRI: non-responder imputation; RFB: reduction from baseline.
Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | axSpA (n = 736) . | r-axSpA/AS (n = 407) . | nr-axSpA (n = 329) . | |||
Baseline Characteristics | ||||||
Age (years), mean (SD) | 32.9 (7.0) | 33.7 (6.8) | 32.1 (7.1) | |||
Male, n (%) | 513 (69.7) | 318 (78.1) | 195 (59.3) | |||
Symptom duration (years), mean (SD) [a] | 2.2 (1.7) | 2.5 (1.8) | 1.8 (1.6) | |||
HLA-B27 positive, n (%) | 597 (81.1) | 354 (87.0) | 243 (73.9) | |||
Sacroiliitis on imaging, n (%) [b] | 691 (93.9) | 401 (98.5) | 290 (88.1) | |||
Prior anti-TNF treatment, n (%) | 31 (4.2) | 20 (4.9) | 11 (3.3) | |||
Clinical Outcomes | ||||||
% | BL | Wk48 (NRI) | BL | Wk48 (NRI) | BL | Wk48 (NRI) |
ASAS20 | - | 79.6 | - | 79.9 | - | 79.3 |
ASAS40 | - | 72.0 | - | 71.3 | - | 72.9 |
ASAS PR | - | 57.3 | - | 55.8 | - | 59.3 |
BASDAI 50 | - | 71.7 | - | 71.3 | - | 72.3 |
Mean [c] | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) |
ASDAS | 3.7 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 1.5 |
HDA/VHDA,% | 98.5 | 24.7† | 98.5 | 25.8 | 98.5 | 23.2‡ |
ID, % | - | 52.7† | - | 52.6 | - | 52.9‡ |
CII, % [d] | - | 76.5 | - | 78.6 | - | 73.9 |
MI, % [d] | - | 56.3 | - | 58.7 | - | 53.2 |
BASDAI | 6.7 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.2 |
BASFI | 5.3 | 1.7 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 5.1 | 1.6 |
BASMI | 3.1 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.9 |
Nocturnal back pain | 6.9 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 1.8 | 6.8 | 1.8 |
Fatigue | 7.1 | 2.6 | 7.1 | 2.5 | 7.1 | 2.6 |
CRP (mg/L), median | 7.8 | 2.0 | 10.7 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | axSpA (n = 736) . | r-axSpA/AS (n = 407) . | nr-axSpA (n = 329) . | |||
Baseline Characteristics | ||||||
Age (years), mean (SD) | 32.9 (7.0) | 33.7 (6.8) | 32.1 (7.1) | |||
Male, n (%) | 513 (69.7) | 318 (78.1) | 195 (59.3) | |||
Symptom duration (years), mean (SD) [a] | 2.2 (1.7) | 2.5 (1.8) | 1.8 (1.6) | |||
HLA-B27 positive, n (%) | 597 (81.1) | 354 (87.0) | 243 (73.9) | |||
Sacroiliitis on imaging, n (%) [b] | 691 (93.9) | 401 (98.5) | 290 (88.1) | |||
Prior anti-TNF treatment, n (%) | 31 (4.2) | 20 (4.9) | 11 (3.3) | |||
Clinical Outcomes | ||||||
% | BL | Wk48 (NRI) | BL | Wk48 (NRI) | BL | Wk48 (NRI) |
ASAS20 | - | 79.6 | - | 79.9 | - | 79.3 |
ASAS40 | - | 72.0 | - | 71.3 | - | 72.9 |
ASAS PR | - | 57.3 | - | 55.8 | - | 59.3 |
BASDAI 50 | - | 71.7 | - | 71.3 | - | 72.3 |
Mean [c] | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) | BL | Wk48 (LOCF [c]) |
ASDAS | 3.7 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 1.5 |
HDA/VHDA,% | 98.5 | 24.7† | 98.5 | 25.8 | 98.5 | 23.2‡ |
ID, % | - | 52.7† | - | 52.6 | - | 52.9‡ |
CII, % [d] | - | 76.5 | - | 78.6 | - | 73.9 |
MI, % [d] | - | 56.3 | - | 58.7 | - | 53.2 |
BASDAI | 6.7 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.2 |
BASFI | 5.3 | 1.7 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 5.1 | 1.6 |
BASMI | 3.1 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.9 |
Nocturnal back pain | 6.9 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 1.8 | 6.8 | 1.8 |
Fatigue | 7.1 | 2.6 | 7.1 | 2.5 | 7.1 | 2.6 |
CRP (mg/L), median | 7.8 | 2.0 | 10.7 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Table Footnote: [a] Time since diagnosis of disease. [b] MRI/Xray. [c] Unless stated otherwise. [d] NRI. †n=734. ‡n=327. ASAS20/40: ≥20%/≥40% improvement in assessment of spondyloarthritis international society response criteria; PR: Partial Remission; ASDAS: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BASDAI 50: ≥50% improvement in BASDAI; BASFI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; BASMI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index; CII: Clinically Important Improvement (RFB ≥1.1); CRP: C-reactive protein; CZP: certolizumab pegol; HDA/VHDA: High/Very High Disease Activity (ASDAS≥2.1); ID: Inactive Disease (ASDAS <1.3); LOCF: last observation carried forward; MI: ASDAS Major Improvement (RFB ≥2.0); (n)r: (non)radiographic; NRI: non-responder imputation; RFB: reduction from baseline.
This abstract was previously submitted to Ghent 2018 and ACR 2018.
Disclosures: R. Landewe: Grants/research support; AbbVie, Ablynx, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering and UCB Pharma. D. van der Heijde: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi and UCB Pha. Other; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV. M. Dougados: Consultancies; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. X. Baraliakos: Consultancies; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. F. Van den Bosch: Consultancies; AbbVie, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. K. Gaffney: Grants/research support; AbbVie, Celgene, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. B. Hoepken: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. K. Thomas: Other; Independent statistician contracted to UCB Pharma. L.S. Gensler: Grants/research support; UCB Pharma.
Comments