-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
R. de Jonge, R. Brouwer, M. Smit, M. de Frankrijker-Merkestijn, R. J. E. M. Dolhain, J. M. W. Hazes, A. W. van Toorenenbergen, J. Lindemans, Automated counting of white blood cells in synovial fluid, Rheumatology, Volume 43, Issue 2, February 2004, Pages 170–173, https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh021
Close - Share Icon Share
Abstract
Objectives. To evaluate the performance of automated leucocyte (white blood cell; WBC) counting by comparison with manual counting.
Methods. The number of WBC was determined in heparinized synovial fluid samples by the use of (i) a standard urine cytometer (Kova) and a microscope (reference method) and (ii) a haematology analyser (Sysmex XE-2100; WBC/BASO and DIFF channels). Imprecision within and between days was determined by replicate analysis of a low (level A; WBC ∼0.560 × 109/l) and a high (level B; WBC ∼1.081 × 109/l) dedicated synovial fluid control (Quantimetrix).
Results. The WBC count of the DIFF channel was highly correlated with the WBC count of the microscopic reference method (r = 0.99; WBC analyser = 0.870 × WBC reference method + 0.413). In contrast, no agreement existed between WBC counts generated by the WBC/BASO channel of the analyser and the reference method (r = 0.52; WBC analyser = 0.008 × WBC reference method + 0.079). Within-day imprecision (4–7%) and between-day imprecision (10%) of the haematology analyser were smaller than the within-day imprecision (12%) and the between-day imprecision (20–22%) of the manual reference method. For manual counting, inter-observer coefficients of variation were 35.9% (control level A) and 21.0% (control level B).
Conclusions. The WBC count in synovial fluid can be reliably determined using the DIFF channel of the Sysmex XE-2100. Automated counting of WBC in synovial fluid offers more precise and faster results than manual counting.
Comments