Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to estimate time trends in cigarette consumption among smokers in England between 2008 and 2023 and to explore differences by key potential moderators.

Aims and Methods

We used data from 57 778 adult cigarette smokers participating in a nationally representative monthly cross-sectional survey between January 2008 and September 2023. We estimated monthly time trends in mean daily consumption of (1) any, (2) manufactured, and (3) hand-rolled cigarettes among all smokers and by main type of cigarettes smoked, smoking frequency, age, gender, occupational social grade, region, nicotine replacement therapy use, and vaping status.

Results

Overall cigarette consumption fell from 13.6 [95% CI = 13.3 to 13.9] to 10.6 [10.5 to 10.8] per day between January 2008 and October 2019 (a 22% decrease), then remained stable up to September 2023. Over this period, the proportion mainly or exclusively smoking hand-rolled cigarettes increased (from 30.6% [29.1%–32.1%] in 2008 to 52.1% [49.7%–54.5%] in 2023). As a result, manufactured cigarette consumption fell by 47%, from 9.5 [9.2–9.8] per day in January 2008 to 5.0 [4.7–5.3] in September 2023, while hand-rolled cigarette consumption increased by 35%, from 4.2 [3.9–4.4] to 5.6 [5.3–5.9], respectively. The decline in overall cigarette consumption was observed across all subgroups, but was greater among non-daily smokers, younger smokers, and those who vaped.

Conclusions

Over the last 15 years, the average number of cigarettes consumed each day by smokers in England has fallen by almost a quarter, but has plateaued since October 2019. There has been a sharp decline in the number of manufactured cigarettes consumed and an increase in the number of hand-rolled cigarettes consumed, as smokers have increasingly shifted towards using hand-rolled tobacco.

Implications

While average cigarette consumption in England has fallen over the past 15 years, this declining trend has stalled (and reversed in some population groups) since 2019. The availability of cheap, hand-rolled tobacco appears to be undermining policies that aim to reduce smoking by raising the price of tobacco (eg, through taxation) and could be targeted to reignite the decline in cigarette consumption.

Introduction

Cigarettes are uniquely lethal, eventually killing up to two-thirds of people who smoke throughout their lives.1 While there is no safe level of consumption,2,3 the risks are greater for people who smoke more cigarettes per day.2–7 In England, the proportion of adults who smoke cigarettes has declined steadily over recent decades.8 However, a substantial minority (12.7% in 20228) continue to smoke, with higher rates among certain population groups.8 It is important to understand the extent to which smokers’ daily cigarette consumption is changing over time at a national level, and how these changes vary between groups. This information can inform estimates of smoking harms and evaluation of policies aiming to reduce smoking and associated inequalities in health.

Daily cigarette consumption is an important determinant of health outcomes. Considerable evidence has shown associations between the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the risk of developing or dying from smoking-related diseases.2–7 These risks are not necessarily linear,2 although some of the nonlinear effects that have been documented may reflect the fact that self-reported daily cigarette consumption is not a perfect marker for exposure, given that people may get more or less nicotine (and with it, harmful substances) out of each cigarette they smoke.9 On a population level, there is evidence that reducing per capita tobacco consumption is associated with lower rates of death from heart disease and cancer.10–13 On an individual level, there is also some evidence that reducing the amount smoked can lower these risks.14 In addition to its direct associations with morbidity and mortality, the risks of higher cigarette consumption may be compounded by a possible association with lower odds of future quitting. Several studies suggest people who smoke more heavily are less inclined to try to quit or have less success in quitting compared with people who smoke fewer cigarettes.15–18 There is mixed evidence as to whether reducing the number of cigarettes smoked per day increases smokers’ odds of making a quit attempt or successfully quitting, with evidence that reduction is more effective when supported by varenicline or nicotine replacement therapy (NRT).19–24

Data from representative population surveys in England have shown a decline in cigarette consumption over recent years. The Health Survey for England recorded a fall in the median number of cigarettes smoked per day among adult smokers aged ≥16 years, from 15 cigarettes per day in 1993 to nine cigarettes per day in 2021.25 Similarly, in the Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (OPN), mean daily cigarette consumption among adult smokers aged ≥16 years fell from 14 in 2000 to 11 in 2017 (and to nine in 2019, although the question was worded differently, meaning this estimate is not directly comparable to previous years).26 The Smoking Toolkit Study estimated that population-level adult cigarette consumption fell by 118.4 million cigarettes per month between 2011 and 2018.27 Cigarette sales data over this period corroborated this decline.27 However, as an estimate of the change in total cigarette consumption in the population, this number reflects a reduction in the total number of smokers as well as in the number of cigarettes consumed by those who smoke.

Little is known about how these changes in cigarette consumption have varied across subgroups of smokers. The Health Survey for England and OPN report data on cigarettes per day separately by sex, which suggests the decline has been similar among men and women.25,26 However, it is possible that other factors may be more strongly linked to trends in cigarette consumption. One important influence on cigarette consumption is affordability.28 Therefore, changes in consumption may vary according to the type of cigarettes people smoke (with hand-rolled cigarettes substantially cheaper than manufactured cigarettes29) or their disposable income (which tends to be lower among younger people30 and those working in routine and manual occupations). There may also be age or regional differences in changes in cigarette consumption.31,32 In addition, changes in cigarette consumption may also have differed between those who do and do not use NRT, as some smokers report using NRT to help them cut down their cigarette consumption.33 Similarly, since e-cigarettes have become popular, there may also have been differences between smokers who do and do not vape, given many dual users (of cigarettes and e-cigarettes) report vaping to reduce the amount they smoke.34

This study aimed to estimate time trends in average daily cigarette consumption among adult current smokers in England between 2008 and 2023, and explore differences by key potential moderators. Specific research questions were:

  • [1] How has current smokers’ mean daily consumption of (1) any cigarettes, (2) manufactured cigarettes, and (3) hand-rolled cigarettes changed since 2008?

  • [2] To what extent have these changes differed by the main type of cigarettes smoked (manufactured or hand-rolled), frequency of smoking (daily or non-daily), age, gender, occupational social grade, region in England, use of NRT, and vaping status?

Materials and Methods

Preregistration

The study protocol and analysis plan were preregistered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/bg7dv/) and followed without amendment. In addition to our planned analyses, we presented descriptive data on the annual proportions of current smokers (1) using manufactured versus hand-rolled cigarettes and (2) smoking daily versus non-daily, to provide additional context.

Design

Data were drawn from the ongoing Smoking Toolkit Study, a monthly cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of adults aged ≥16 years in England.35 The study uses a hybrid of random probability and simple quota sampling to select a new sample of approximately 1700 adults each month. Interviews are held with one household member in selected geographic output areas until quotas are fulfilled. The quotas are based on factors influencing the probability of being at home (ie, working status, age, and gender). This hybrid form of random probability and quota sampling is considered superior to conventional quota sampling.36 Here, the choice of households to approach is limited by the random allocation of small output areas and rather than being sent to specific households in advance, interviewers can choose which households within these small geographic areas are most likely to fulfill their quotas. Therefore, unlike random probability sampling, it is not appropriate to record the response rate. Comparisons with sales data and other national surveys indicate that key variables including sociodemographic characteristics, smoking prevalence, and cigarette consumption are nationally representative.27,35

We used data collected from January 2008 (the first year to collect data on the type of cigarettes smoked) through September 2023 (the most recent data at the time of analysis). Data were initially collected through face-to-face computer-assisted interviews. However, social distancing restrictions under the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic meant no data were collected in March 2020 and data from April 2020 onwards were collected via telephone. The telephone-based data collection used broadly the same combination of random location and quota sampling, and weighting approach as the face-to-face interviews and comparisons of the two data collection modalities indicate good comparability.37

For analysis, we selected respondents who reported current cigarette smoking. Because data were not collected from 16- and 17-year-olds between April 2020 and December 2021, we restricted our sample to those aged ≥ 18 for consistency across the time series.

Measures

Smoking status was assessed by asking participants which of the following best applied to them:

  • (a) “I smoke cigarettes (including hand-rolled) every day.”

  • (b) “I smoke cigarettes (including hand-rolled), but not every day.”

  • (c) “I do not smoke cigarettes at all, but I do smoke tobacco of some kind (eg, pipe, cigar, or shisha).”

  • (d) “I have stopped smoking completely in the last year.”

  • (e) “I stopped smoking completely more than a year ago.”

  • (f) “I have never been a smoker (ie, smoked for a year or more).”

Those who responded a or b were considered current cigarette smokers. Those who responded c to f were excluded from the analytic sample.

Cigarette consumption was assessed with the question: ‘How many cigarettes do you usually smoke?’ Participants could choose to give their answers per day or per week (or per month, in some waves). Participants who responded ‘don’t know’ were encouraged to give their best estimates. Our primary outcome was total daily cigarette consumption (ie, cigarettes per day; or cigarettes per week divided by 7 or per month divided by 30). Secondary outcomes were daily hand-rolled cigarette consumption and daily manufactured cigarette consumption (calculated as total daily cigarette consumption minus daily hand-rolled cigarette consumption). These were assessed with the additional question: “How many of these do you think are hand-rolled?.” Total, manufactured, and hand-rolled cigarette consumption were analyzed as continuous variables. We considered consumption of more than 80 cigarettes per day to be implausible,38 so replaced responses above this level with the value 80.

Main type of cigarettes smoked was defined as hand-rolled for those who reported at least 50% of their total cigarette consumption is hand-rolled, and manufactured for those who reported that less than 50% is hand-rolled. This definition allows the inclusion of those who smoke both hand-rolled and manufactured cigarettes as well as those who exclusively smoke one type of cigarettes.

Frequency of smoking was defined according to responses to the question assessing smoking status (described above), with those who responded a considered daily cigarette smokers and those who responded b non-daily cigarette smokers.

Age was analyzed as a continuous variable, modeled using restricted cubic splines (see Statistical analysis section). We also provide descriptive data by age group (18–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and ≥65).

Gender was self-reported as man or woman. In more recent waves, participants have also had the option to describe their gender in another way; those who identified in another way were excluded from analyses by gender due to low numbers.

Occupational social grade was categorized based on National Readership Survey classifications39 as ABC1 (includes managerial, professional, and upper supervisory occupations) and C2DE (includes manual routine, semi-routine, lower supervisory, and long-term unemployed). This occupational measure of social grade is a widely used and valid index of socioeconomic position that is widely used in research in UK populations. It has been identified as particularly relevant in the context of tobacco use and quitting.40

Region in England was categorized as north, midlands, and south.

NRT use was assessed with a series of questions that asked participants whether they are currently using a range of nicotine products to help them stop smoking, cut down the amount smoked, in situations when smoking is not permitted, or for any other reason at all. Those who reported currently using NRT (nicotine gum, lozenges or tablets, inhaler, nasal spray, patch, or mouth spray) in response to any of these questions were considered current NRT users.

Vaping status was assessed with the same series of questions used to assess NRT use. Those who reported currently using an e-cigarette in response to any of these questions were considered current vapers. Data on current e-cigarette use were only available from April 2011, so analyses by vaping status were limited to this period. Frequency of vaping was assessed within a question asking about frequency of use of the nicotine products the participant reported using in the series of questions used to assess NRT use and vaping status: ‘How many times per day on average do you use your nicotine replacement product or products?’ Our primary analysis defined vaping status as any current use of e-cigarettes (yes or no); a sensitivity analysis compared daily and non-daily vapers. Because the measure of frequency of use did not distinguish between the use of e-cigarettes and other nicotine products, we repeated this sensitivity analysis restricting the sample to vapers who did not use NRT (unplanned analysis) to explore any impact of this on the results.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using R v.4.2.1. The Smoking Toolkit Study uses raking to weight the sample to match the population in England. This profile is determined each month by combining data from the UK Census, the Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, and the annual National Readership Survey.35 The following analyses used weighted data. We excluded participants with missing data on overall daily cigarette consumption (2.0%). Missing cases on other variables (see Table S1 for details) were excluded on a per-analysis basis.

We reported descriptive data on daily (1) overall, (2) manufactured, and (3) hand-rolled cigarette consumption by survey year, among all adult cigarette smokers and within subgroups.

We used linear regression to estimate monthly time trends in daily (1) overall, (2) manufactured, and (3) hand-rolled cigarette consumption across the study period. Time (survey wave) was modeled using restricted cubic splines with five knots (sufficient to accurately model trends across years without overfitting), to allow relationships with time to be flexible and nonlinear, while avoiding categorization.

To explore moderation by the main type of cigarettes smoked, frequency of smoking, age, gender, occupational social grade, region in England, NRT use, and vaping status, we repeated the models including the interaction between the moderator of interest and time—thus allowing for time trends to differ across subgroups. Each of the interactions was tested in a separate model (with no adjustment for other variables). Age was modeled using restricted cubic splines with three knots (placed at the 5%, 50%, and 95% quantiles), to allow for a nonlinear relationship between age and daily cigarette consumption. We conducted a sensitivity analysis within current vapers comparing trends among daily versus non-daily users (ie, testing the interaction between frequency of vaping [daily or non-daily] and time).

We used predicted estimates from these models to plot mean daily cigarette consumption over the study period and derive specific predictions for current levels of cigarette consumption (in September 2023) compared with the start of the study period (January 2008), among all cigarette smokers and within each subgroup of interest. Note that estimates of cigarette consumption in January 2008 and September 2023 incorporated information from all survey waves, not just participants surveyed in these months, thus increasing statistical precision. As age was modeled continuously, we displayed estimates for six specific ages (18-, 25-, 35-, 45-, 55-, and 65-year-olds) to illustrate how trends differ across ages. Note that the model used to derive these estimates included data from participants of all ages, not only those aged exactly 18, 25, 35, 45, 55, or 65 years.

Results

A total of 318 083 (unweighted) adults aged ≥18 years were surveyed between January 2008 and September 2023, of whom 58 974 (18.5%) reported current cigarette smoking. We excluded 1196 (2.0%) with missing data on daily cigarette consumption, leaving a final sample for analysis of 57 778 participants. Forty-four participants (0.08%) reported smoking more than 80 cigarettes per day; their consumption was imputed as 80 in line with our assumptions around plausibility (see Measures section). Sample characteristics are summarized in Table S1.

Trends in Cigarette Consumption Among All Current Smokers

Among all current smokers, mean overall cigarette consumption decreased from 13.5 [95% CI: 13.2 to 13.7] cigarettes per day in 2008 to 11.0 [10.5–11.4] in 2023 (Table S2; Figure 1A). Our model indicated this decline was nonlinear (Figure 1B), falling steadily between January 2008 and October 2019, from 13.6 [13.3–13.9] to 10.6 [10.5–10.8], then remaining stable between 10.5 and 10.6 up to September 2023. As the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day declined, the distribution became more skewed, with an increasing proportion of smokers reporting low levels of consumption (<5 cigarettes per day; Figure 2). The peaks at 10, 15, and 20 cigarettes per day became less pronounced over time while a plateau between 1 and 5 cigarettes per day emerged (Figure 2). There was also an increase in the proportion who reported smoking non-daily (Figure S1). In addition, there was a shift in the main type of cigarettes people were smoking: the proportion mainly smoking hand-rolled cigarettes increased from 30.6% [29.1%–32.1%] in 2008 to 52.1% [49.7%–54.5%] in 2023 (Figure S2). As a result, mean consumption of manufactured cigarettes fell from 9.3 [9.0–9.6] per day in 2008 to 5.4 [5.0–5.8] in 2023 (Table S3), while mean consumption of hand-rolled cigarettes increased from 4.2 [4.0–4.4] to 5.7 [5.3–6.1] per day (Table S4; Figure 1A). These changes occurred predominantly between 2008 and 2015, with the rate of decline in manufactured cigarette consumption and the rate of increase in hand-rolled cigarette consumption slowing notably from 2016 onwards (Figure 1B).

Mean daily cigarette consumption among adult (≥18 years) smokers in England, 2008 to 2023. Panel A shows weighted data aggregated by year. Bars represent mean overall daily cigarette consumption as a function of cigarette type (manufactured vs. hand-rolled). * Data for 2023 are based on January to September only. Annual estimates of mean daily cigarette consumption within each subgroup of interest are provided in  Tables S2  (all cigarettes), S3 (manufactured cigarettes), and S4 (hand-rolled cigarettes). Panel B shows modeled time trends, overall, and by cigarette type. Lines represent modeled weighted mean daily cigarette consumption by monthly survey wave, modeled nonlinearly using restricted cubic splines (five knots). Shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals. Modeled estimates of mean daily cigarette consumption (overall and by cigarette type) at the start and end of the study period, among all smokers and within each subgroup of interest, are provided in  Table 1.
Figure 1.

Mean daily cigarette consumption among adult (≥18 years) smokers in England, 2008 to 2023. Panel A shows weighted data aggregated by year. Bars represent mean overall daily cigarette consumption as a function of cigarette type (manufactured vs. hand-rolled). * Data for 2023 are based on January to September only. Annual estimates of mean daily cigarette consumption within each subgroup of interest are provided in  Tables S2  (all cigarettes), S3 (manufactured cigarettes), and S4 (hand-rolled cigarettes). Panel B shows modeled time trends, overall, and by cigarette type. Lines represent modeled weighted mean daily cigarette consumption by monthly survey wave, modeled nonlinearly using restricted cubic splines (five knots). Shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals. Modeled estimates of mean daily cigarette consumption (overall and by cigarette type) at the start and end of the study period, among all smokers and within each subgroup of interest, are provided in  Table 1.

Distributions of overall daily cigarette consumption among adult (≥18 years) smokers in England, 2008–2009 to 2022–2023.
Figure 2.

Distributions of overall daily cigarette consumption among adult (≥18 years) smokers in England, 2008–2009 to 2022–2023.

Trends in Cigarette Consumption Within Subgroups of Smokers

Across the study period, mean overall cigarette consumption was consistently higher among daily smokers and those who were older, men, from more disadvantaged social grades (C2DE), and living in the north (vs. south) of England (Table S2; Figure 3). Mean manufactured cigarette consumption was consistently higher among those who mainly or exclusively used manufactured cigarettes, daily smokers, and those who were older and living in the north (vs. south) of England (Table S3; Figure S3) and mean hand-rolled cigarette consumption was consistently higher among those who mainly or exclusively used hand-rolled cigarettes, daily smokers, men, and those from more disadvantaged social grades (C2DE; Table S4; Figure S4).

Time trends in overall daily cigarette consumption among adult (≥18 years) smokers in England, January 2008 to September 2023. Panels show trends by (A) main type of cigarettes smoked (includes those mainly or exclusively smoking manufactured or hand-rolled cigarettes, defined as ≥50% of total cigarettes), (B) frequency of smoking, (C) age, (D) gender, (E) occupational social grade, (F) region in England, (G) nicotine replacement therapy use, and (H) vaping status. Lines represent modeled weighted mean daily cigarette consumption by monthly survey wave, modeled nonlinearly using restricted cubic splines (five knots). Shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals. * Vaping status has only been assessed since April 2011. Corresponding figures for daily consumption of manufactured and hand-rolled cigarettes are provided in  Figures S3  and  S4.
Figure 3.

Time trends in overall daily cigarette consumption among adult (≥18 years) smokers in England, January 2008 to September 2023. Panels show trends by (A) main type of cigarettes smoked (includes those mainly or exclusively smoking manufactured or hand-rolled cigarettes, defined as ≥50% of total cigarettes), (B) frequency of smoking, (C) age, (D) gender, (E) occupational social grade, (F) region in England, (G) nicotine replacement therapy use, and (H) vaping status. Lines represent modeled weighted mean daily cigarette consumption by monthly survey wave, modeled nonlinearly using restricted cubic splines (five knots). Shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals. * Vaping status has only been assessed since April 2011. Corresponding figures for daily consumption of manufactured and hand-rolled cigarettes are provided in  Figures S3  and  S4.

From the start to the end of the study period, we observed a significant decline in overall cigarette consumption across all subgroups (Table 1; Figure 3). The relative extent of this decline was greater among non-daily smokers (−36.4% vs. −10.7% among daily smokers), those who were younger (eg, −37.9% among 18-year-olds vs. −13.5% among 65-year-olds), and those who currently vaped (−31.8% vs. −10.3% among non-vapers)—particularly those who vaped daily (−30.9% vs. −15.5% among non-daily vapers; Figure S5). The association between vaping status and overall cigarette consumption reversed during the course of the study, with smokers who vaped reporting slightly higher overall cigarette consumption than those who did not vape in April 2011 (the first wave in which vaping status was assessed; 14.3 vs. 12.5 cigarettes per day), but significantly lower consumption by the end of the study (September 2023; 9.7 vs. 11.2; Table 1, Figure 3). From 2019 onwards, the decline in overall cigarette consumption leveled off more prominently among those who were daily smokers, aged ≥55, men, from more advantaged social grades (ABC1), and did not currently vape (Figure 3). The declining trend even reversed in some of these groups, with a significant increase in daily cigarette consumption observed among daily smokers (Figure 3B) and those from more advantaged social grades (ABC1; Figure 3E). The plateau was more consistent within the remaining subgroups.

Manufactured cigarette consumption also declined significantly across all subgroups (Table 1; Figure S3). The relative extent of this decline was greater among those who mainly or exclusively smoked hand-rolled cigarettes (−63.5% vs. −20.9% among those who mainly or exclusively smoked manufactured cigarettes), non-daily smokers (−54.3% vs. −39.8% among daily smokers), those who were younger (e.g., −75.9% among 18-year-olds vs. −29.9% among 65-year-olds), women (−52.5% vs. −42.9% among men), and those who currently vaped (−63.3% vs. −29.3% among non-users). As we observed for overall consumption, manufactured cigarette consumption was significantly higher among smokers who vaped than those who did not vape at the start of the study but significantly lower in the former versus the latter group by the end.

Hand-rolled cigarette consumption increased significantly across most, but not all, subgroups (Table 1; Figure S4). Notably, the number of hand-rolled cigarettes smoked per day declined by 21.8% among those who mainly or exclusively smoked hand-rolled cigarettes and did not change significantly among those who mainly or exclusively smoked manufactured cigarettes. This suggests the increase we observed among all smokers and within other subgroups was the result of a shift in product preference from manufactured to hand-rolled cigarettes, rather than people who smoked hand-rolled cigarettes increasing their consumption. Consistent with this, we saw an increase in the proportion who mainly or exclusively smoked hand-rolled cigarettes across the study period within each of the other subgroups of interest (Figure S6). In addition, most of the subgroups with a greater relative decline in manufactured cigarette consumption also showed a greater relative increase in hand-rolled consumption: those who were younger (eg, + 79.7% among 18-year-olds vs. + 38.8% among 65-year-olds), women (+ 57.1% vs. + 19.5% among men), and those who currently vaped (+ 118.6% vs. + 21.8% among non-users). The increase in hand-rolled cigarette consumption was also greater among daily smokers (+ 54.3% vs. + 30.8% among non-daily smokers), those from more advantaged social grades (ABC1; + 65.5% vs. 27.3% among C2DE), and those using NRT (+ 72.9 vs. + 29.2% among non-users).

Table 1.

Modeled Estimates of the Change in Daily Cigarette Consumption Among Adult Smokers (≥18 Years) in England From January 2008 to September 2023

All cigarettes per dayManufactured cigarettes per dayHand-rolled cigarettes per day
Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2
Jan 2008Sept 2023Jan 2008Sept 2023Jan 2008Sept 2023
All adult (≥18 years) smokers13.6 [13.3 to 13.9]10.6 [10.3 to 11.0]−22.19.5 [9.2 to 9.8]5.0 [4.7 to 5.3]−47.04.2 [3.9 to 4.4]5.6 [5.3 to 5.9]+34.9
Main type of cigarettes smoked3
Manufactured13.5 [13.1 to 13.8]10.7 [10.2 to 11.2]−20.713.2 [12.9 to 13.6]10.5 [10.0 to 10.9]−20.90.24 [0.19 to 0.28]0.21 [0.16 to 0.27]−9.5
Hand-rolled14.1 [13.6 to 14.6]10.6 [10.1 to 11.1]−24.80.95 [0.80 to 1.1]0.35 [0.25 to 0.44]−63.513.1 [12.6 to 13.6]10.3 [9.8 to 10.7]−21.8
Frequency of smoking
Non-daily4.9 [4.3 to 5.5]3.1 [2.8 to 3.4]−36.43.8 [3.3 to 4.4]1.7 [1.5 to 2.0]−54.31.1 [0.7 to 1.4]1.4 [1.1 to 1.6]+30.8
Daily14.6 [14.3 to 14.9]13.1 [12.7 to 13.4]−10.710.1 [9.8 to 10.5]6.1 [5.7 to 6.5]−39.84.5 [4.2 to 4.8]7.0 [6.6 to 7.4]+54.3
Age (years)4
1810.5 [9.8 to 11.2]6.5 [5.7 to 7.3]−37.97.9 [7.2 to 8.6]1.9 [1.3 to 2.5]−75.92.6 [2.0 to 3.1]4.6 [3.9 to 5.3]+79.7
2512.0 [11.6 to 12.5]8.1 [7.6 to 8.6]−32.58.4 [8.0 to 8.9]2.7 [2.4 to 3.1]−67.43.6 [3.2 to 4.0]5.3 [4.9 to 5.8]+49.0
3513.9 [13.6 to 14.3]10.2 [9.8 to 10.6]−26.89.2 [8.7 to 9.6]4.0 [3.6 to 4.3]−56.74.8 [4.5 to 5.1]6.2 [5.8 to 6.6]+29.5
4515.0 [14.6 to 15.5]11.7 [11.2 to 12.2]−22.49.8 [9.3 to 10.3]5.2 [4.7 to 5.7]−47.15.2 [4.8 to 5.6]6.4 [6.0 to 6.9]+23.7
5515.2 [14.8 to 15.6]12.4 [12.0 to 12.9]−18.110.5 [10.0 to 11.0]6.5 [6.1 to 6.9]−38.14.7 [4.3 to 5.1]6.0 [5.5 to 6.4]+26.6
6514.8 [14.2 to 15.3]12.8 [12.2 to 13.3]−13.511.2 [10.6 to 11.7]7.8 [7.3 to 8.4]−29.93.6 [3.2 to 4.0]5.0 [4.5 to 5.5]+38.8
Gender
Men14.4 [14.0 to 14.9]11.5 [11.0 to 12.0]−20.49.1 [8.7 to 9.6]5.2 [4.8 to 5.7]−42.95.3 [4.9 to 5.7]6.4 [5.9 to 6.9]+19.5
Women12.9 [12.5 to 13.2]9.5 [9.1 to 9.9]−26.49.8 [9.4 to 10.2]4.7 [4.3 to 5.0]−52.53.1 [2.8 to 3.3]4.8 [4.4 to 5.2]+57.1
Occupational social grade
ABC1 (more advantaged)12.3 [11.8 to 12.8]9.8 [9.4 to 10.3]−20.09.6 [9.1 to 10.1]5.4 [5.0 to 5.8]−43.72.7 [2.3 to 3.0]4.4 [4.1 to 4.8]+65.5
C2DE (less advantaged)14.5 [14.1 to 14.9]11.2 [10.8 to 11.7]−22.59.4 [9.0 to 9.8]4.8 [4.4 to 5.2]−49.35.1 [4.8 to 5.5]6.5 [6.1 to 7.0]+27.3
Region in England
North14.3 [13.8 to 14.8]11.3 [10.7 to 11.9]−20.910.3 [9.8 to 10.8]5.7 [5.1 to 6.2]−45.23.9 [3.5 to 4.4]5.6 [5.0 to 6.2]+42.9
Midlands13.8 [13.3 to 14.4]11.1 [10.5 to 11.8]−19.69.2 [8.6 to 9.8]4.9 [4.4 to 5.5]−46.44.6 [4.1 to 5.1]6.2 [5.6 to 6.8]+34.3
South12.8 [12.3 to 13.3]9.9 [9.4 to 10.4]−22.88.8 [8.3 to 9.3]4.7 [4.3 to 5.1]−46.84.0 [3.6 to 4.4]5.2 [4.8 to 5.7]+30.6
Current use of NRT
No13.4 [13.1 to 13.7]10.5 [10.1 to 10.8]−22.09.2 [8.8 to 9.5]5.0 [4.7 to 5.3]−45.74.3 [4.0 to 4.5]5.5 [5.2 to 5.8]+29.2
Yes14.6 [13.9 to 15.3]12.0 [10.9 to 13.1]−18.010.8 [10.0 to 11.6]5.5 [4.7 to 6.3]−49.33.8 [3.2 to 4.4]6.6 [5.5 to 7.8]+72.9
All cigarettes per dayManufactured cigarettes per dayHand-rolled cigarettes per day
Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2
Jan 2008Sept 2023Jan 2008Sept 2023Jan 2008Sept 2023
All adult (≥18 years) smokers13.6 [13.3 to 13.9]10.6 [10.3 to 11.0]−22.19.5 [9.2 to 9.8]5.0 [4.7 to 5.3]−47.04.2 [3.9 to 4.4]5.6 [5.3 to 5.9]+34.9
Main type of cigarettes smoked3
Manufactured13.5 [13.1 to 13.8]10.7 [10.2 to 11.2]−20.713.2 [12.9 to 13.6]10.5 [10.0 to 10.9]−20.90.24 [0.19 to 0.28]0.21 [0.16 to 0.27]−9.5
Hand-rolled14.1 [13.6 to 14.6]10.6 [10.1 to 11.1]−24.80.95 [0.80 to 1.1]0.35 [0.25 to 0.44]−63.513.1 [12.6 to 13.6]10.3 [9.8 to 10.7]−21.8
Frequency of smoking
Non-daily4.9 [4.3 to 5.5]3.1 [2.8 to 3.4]−36.43.8 [3.3 to 4.4]1.7 [1.5 to 2.0]−54.31.1 [0.7 to 1.4]1.4 [1.1 to 1.6]+30.8
Daily14.6 [14.3 to 14.9]13.1 [12.7 to 13.4]−10.710.1 [9.8 to 10.5]6.1 [5.7 to 6.5]−39.84.5 [4.2 to 4.8]7.0 [6.6 to 7.4]+54.3
Age (years)4
1810.5 [9.8 to 11.2]6.5 [5.7 to 7.3]−37.97.9 [7.2 to 8.6]1.9 [1.3 to 2.5]−75.92.6 [2.0 to 3.1]4.6 [3.9 to 5.3]+79.7
2512.0 [11.6 to 12.5]8.1 [7.6 to 8.6]−32.58.4 [8.0 to 8.9]2.7 [2.4 to 3.1]−67.43.6 [3.2 to 4.0]5.3 [4.9 to 5.8]+49.0
3513.9 [13.6 to 14.3]10.2 [9.8 to 10.6]−26.89.2 [8.7 to 9.6]4.0 [3.6 to 4.3]−56.74.8 [4.5 to 5.1]6.2 [5.8 to 6.6]+29.5
4515.0 [14.6 to 15.5]11.7 [11.2 to 12.2]−22.49.8 [9.3 to 10.3]5.2 [4.7 to 5.7]−47.15.2 [4.8 to 5.6]6.4 [6.0 to 6.9]+23.7
5515.2 [14.8 to 15.6]12.4 [12.0 to 12.9]−18.110.5 [10.0 to 11.0]6.5 [6.1 to 6.9]−38.14.7 [4.3 to 5.1]6.0 [5.5 to 6.4]+26.6
6514.8 [14.2 to 15.3]12.8 [12.2 to 13.3]−13.511.2 [10.6 to 11.7]7.8 [7.3 to 8.4]−29.93.6 [3.2 to 4.0]5.0 [4.5 to 5.5]+38.8
Gender
Men14.4 [14.0 to 14.9]11.5 [11.0 to 12.0]−20.49.1 [8.7 to 9.6]5.2 [4.8 to 5.7]−42.95.3 [4.9 to 5.7]6.4 [5.9 to 6.9]+19.5
Women12.9 [12.5 to 13.2]9.5 [9.1 to 9.9]−26.49.8 [9.4 to 10.2]4.7 [4.3 to 5.0]−52.53.1 [2.8 to 3.3]4.8 [4.4 to 5.2]+57.1
Occupational social grade
ABC1 (more advantaged)12.3 [11.8 to 12.8]9.8 [9.4 to 10.3]−20.09.6 [9.1 to 10.1]5.4 [5.0 to 5.8]−43.72.7 [2.3 to 3.0]4.4 [4.1 to 4.8]+65.5
C2DE (less advantaged)14.5 [14.1 to 14.9]11.2 [10.8 to 11.7]−22.59.4 [9.0 to 9.8]4.8 [4.4 to 5.2]−49.35.1 [4.8 to 5.5]6.5 [6.1 to 7.0]+27.3
Region in England
North14.3 [13.8 to 14.8]11.3 [10.7 to 11.9]−20.910.3 [9.8 to 10.8]5.7 [5.1 to 6.2]−45.23.9 [3.5 to 4.4]5.6 [5.0 to 6.2]+42.9
Midlands13.8 [13.3 to 14.4]11.1 [10.5 to 11.8]−19.69.2 [8.6 to 9.8]4.9 [4.4 to 5.5]−46.44.6 [4.1 to 5.1]6.2 [5.6 to 6.8]+34.3
South12.8 [12.3 to 13.3]9.9 [9.4 to 10.4]−22.88.8 [8.3 to 9.3]4.7 [4.3 to 5.1]−46.84.0 [3.6 to 4.4]5.2 [4.8 to 5.7]+30.6
Current use of NRT
No13.4 [13.1 to 13.7]10.5 [10.1 to 10.8]−22.09.2 [8.8 to 9.5]5.0 [4.7 to 5.3]−45.74.3 [4.0 to 4.5]5.5 [5.2 to 5.8]+29.2
Yes14.6 [13.9 to 15.3]12.0 [10.9 to 13.1]−18.010.8 [10.0 to 11.6]5.5 [4.7 to 6.3]−49.33.8 [3.2 to 4.4]6.6 [5.5 to 7.8]+72.9
Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2
Apr 2011Sept 2023Apr 2011Sept 2023Apr 2011Sept 2023
Current vaping5
No12.5 [12.1 to 12.8]11.2 [10.7 to 11.6]−10.37.7 [7.4 to 8.1]5.5 [5.1 to 5.9]−29.34.7 [4.4 to 5.0]5.7 [5.3 to 6.1]+21.8
Yes14.3 [12.5 to 16.0]9.7 [9.1 to 10.4]−31.811.7 [9.8 to 13.5]4.3 [3.7 to 4.9]−63.32.5 [1.2 to 3.8]5.5 [4.9 to 6.2]+118.6
Non-daily15.0 [12.6 to 17.5]12.7 [10.3 to 15.0]−15.511.6 [8.9 to 14.3]5.7 [3.5 to 8.0]−50.43.3 [1.4 to 5.2]7.0 [4.5 to 9.6]+115.4
Daily13.4 [11.8 to 15.0]9.3 [7.9 to 10.6]−30.910.9 [9.2 to 12.6]4.0 [2.9 to 5.2]−62.92.5 [1.2 to 3.8]5.2 [4.0 to 6.5]+108.0
Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2
Apr 2011Sept 2023Apr 2011Sept 2023Apr 2011Sept 2023
Current vaping5
No12.5 [12.1 to 12.8]11.2 [10.7 to 11.6]−10.37.7 [7.4 to 8.1]5.5 [5.1 to 5.9]−29.34.7 [4.4 to 5.0]5.7 [5.3 to 6.1]+21.8
Yes14.3 [12.5 to 16.0]9.7 [9.1 to 10.4]−31.811.7 [9.8 to 13.5]4.3 [3.7 to 4.9]−63.32.5 [1.2 to 3.8]5.5 [4.9 to 6.2]+118.6
Non-daily15.0 [12.6 to 17.5]12.7 [10.3 to 15.0]−15.511.6 [8.9 to 14.3]5.7 [3.5 to 8.0]−50.43.3 [1.4 to 5.2]7.0 [4.5 to 9.6]+115.4
Daily13.4 [11.8 to 15.0]9.3 [7.9 to 10.6]−30.910.9 [9.2 to 12.6]4.0 [2.9 to 5.2]−62.92.5 [1.2 to 3.8]5.2 [4.0 to 6.5]+108.0

1Data for January 2008 and September 2023 are weighted estimates in these months (the first and last in the study period) from linear regression with survey month modeled nonlinearly using restricted cubic splines (five knots). Interactions between survey month and each characteristic of interest were modeled separately to derive estimates within subgroups of smokers. Note that these estimates were derived from models incorporating information from all survey waves, not just participants surveyed in these months. Estimates are unadjusted.

2Percentage change between January 2008 and September 2023.

3Includes those mainly or exclusively smoking manufactured or hand-rolled cigarettes (defined as ≥50% of total cigarettes being manufactured or hand-rolled).

4 Note that the model used to derive these estimates included data from participants of all ages, not only those who were aged exactly 18, 25, 35, 45, 55, or 65 years.

5Vaping status has only been assessed since April 2011, so data are for April 2011 and September 2023, and the percentage change reflects the change between April 2011 and September 2023. Unmodelled estimates of mean daily cigarette consumption within each survey year are provided in  Tables S2-4.

Table 1.

Modeled Estimates of the Change in Daily Cigarette Consumption Among Adult Smokers (≥18 Years) in England From January 2008 to September 2023

All cigarettes per dayManufactured cigarettes per dayHand-rolled cigarettes per day
Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2
Jan 2008Sept 2023Jan 2008Sept 2023Jan 2008Sept 2023
All adult (≥18 years) smokers13.6 [13.3 to 13.9]10.6 [10.3 to 11.0]−22.19.5 [9.2 to 9.8]5.0 [4.7 to 5.3]−47.04.2 [3.9 to 4.4]5.6 [5.3 to 5.9]+34.9
Main type of cigarettes smoked3
Manufactured13.5 [13.1 to 13.8]10.7 [10.2 to 11.2]−20.713.2 [12.9 to 13.6]10.5 [10.0 to 10.9]−20.90.24 [0.19 to 0.28]0.21 [0.16 to 0.27]−9.5
Hand-rolled14.1 [13.6 to 14.6]10.6 [10.1 to 11.1]−24.80.95 [0.80 to 1.1]0.35 [0.25 to 0.44]−63.513.1 [12.6 to 13.6]10.3 [9.8 to 10.7]−21.8
Frequency of smoking
Non-daily4.9 [4.3 to 5.5]3.1 [2.8 to 3.4]−36.43.8 [3.3 to 4.4]1.7 [1.5 to 2.0]−54.31.1 [0.7 to 1.4]1.4 [1.1 to 1.6]+30.8
Daily14.6 [14.3 to 14.9]13.1 [12.7 to 13.4]−10.710.1 [9.8 to 10.5]6.1 [5.7 to 6.5]−39.84.5 [4.2 to 4.8]7.0 [6.6 to 7.4]+54.3
Age (years)4
1810.5 [9.8 to 11.2]6.5 [5.7 to 7.3]−37.97.9 [7.2 to 8.6]1.9 [1.3 to 2.5]−75.92.6 [2.0 to 3.1]4.6 [3.9 to 5.3]+79.7
2512.0 [11.6 to 12.5]8.1 [7.6 to 8.6]−32.58.4 [8.0 to 8.9]2.7 [2.4 to 3.1]−67.43.6 [3.2 to 4.0]5.3 [4.9 to 5.8]+49.0
3513.9 [13.6 to 14.3]10.2 [9.8 to 10.6]−26.89.2 [8.7 to 9.6]4.0 [3.6 to 4.3]−56.74.8 [4.5 to 5.1]6.2 [5.8 to 6.6]+29.5
4515.0 [14.6 to 15.5]11.7 [11.2 to 12.2]−22.49.8 [9.3 to 10.3]5.2 [4.7 to 5.7]−47.15.2 [4.8 to 5.6]6.4 [6.0 to 6.9]+23.7
5515.2 [14.8 to 15.6]12.4 [12.0 to 12.9]−18.110.5 [10.0 to 11.0]6.5 [6.1 to 6.9]−38.14.7 [4.3 to 5.1]6.0 [5.5 to 6.4]+26.6
6514.8 [14.2 to 15.3]12.8 [12.2 to 13.3]−13.511.2 [10.6 to 11.7]7.8 [7.3 to 8.4]−29.93.6 [3.2 to 4.0]5.0 [4.5 to 5.5]+38.8
Gender
Men14.4 [14.0 to 14.9]11.5 [11.0 to 12.0]−20.49.1 [8.7 to 9.6]5.2 [4.8 to 5.7]−42.95.3 [4.9 to 5.7]6.4 [5.9 to 6.9]+19.5
Women12.9 [12.5 to 13.2]9.5 [9.1 to 9.9]−26.49.8 [9.4 to 10.2]4.7 [4.3 to 5.0]−52.53.1 [2.8 to 3.3]4.8 [4.4 to 5.2]+57.1
Occupational social grade
ABC1 (more advantaged)12.3 [11.8 to 12.8]9.8 [9.4 to 10.3]−20.09.6 [9.1 to 10.1]5.4 [5.0 to 5.8]−43.72.7 [2.3 to 3.0]4.4 [4.1 to 4.8]+65.5
C2DE (less advantaged)14.5 [14.1 to 14.9]11.2 [10.8 to 11.7]−22.59.4 [9.0 to 9.8]4.8 [4.4 to 5.2]−49.35.1 [4.8 to 5.5]6.5 [6.1 to 7.0]+27.3
Region in England
North14.3 [13.8 to 14.8]11.3 [10.7 to 11.9]−20.910.3 [9.8 to 10.8]5.7 [5.1 to 6.2]−45.23.9 [3.5 to 4.4]5.6 [5.0 to 6.2]+42.9
Midlands13.8 [13.3 to 14.4]11.1 [10.5 to 11.8]−19.69.2 [8.6 to 9.8]4.9 [4.4 to 5.5]−46.44.6 [4.1 to 5.1]6.2 [5.6 to 6.8]+34.3
South12.8 [12.3 to 13.3]9.9 [9.4 to 10.4]−22.88.8 [8.3 to 9.3]4.7 [4.3 to 5.1]−46.84.0 [3.6 to 4.4]5.2 [4.8 to 5.7]+30.6
Current use of NRT
No13.4 [13.1 to 13.7]10.5 [10.1 to 10.8]−22.09.2 [8.8 to 9.5]5.0 [4.7 to 5.3]−45.74.3 [4.0 to 4.5]5.5 [5.2 to 5.8]+29.2
Yes14.6 [13.9 to 15.3]12.0 [10.9 to 13.1]−18.010.8 [10.0 to 11.6]5.5 [4.7 to 6.3]−49.33.8 [3.2 to 4.4]6.6 [5.5 to 7.8]+72.9
All cigarettes per dayManufactured cigarettes per dayHand-rolled cigarettes per day
Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2
Jan 2008Sept 2023Jan 2008Sept 2023Jan 2008Sept 2023
All adult (≥18 years) smokers13.6 [13.3 to 13.9]10.6 [10.3 to 11.0]−22.19.5 [9.2 to 9.8]5.0 [4.7 to 5.3]−47.04.2 [3.9 to 4.4]5.6 [5.3 to 5.9]+34.9
Main type of cigarettes smoked3
Manufactured13.5 [13.1 to 13.8]10.7 [10.2 to 11.2]−20.713.2 [12.9 to 13.6]10.5 [10.0 to 10.9]−20.90.24 [0.19 to 0.28]0.21 [0.16 to 0.27]−9.5
Hand-rolled14.1 [13.6 to 14.6]10.6 [10.1 to 11.1]−24.80.95 [0.80 to 1.1]0.35 [0.25 to 0.44]−63.513.1 [12.6 to 13.6]10.3 [9.8 to 10.7]−21.8
Frequency of smoking
Non-daily4.9 [4.3 to 5.5]3.1 [2.8 to 3.4]−36.43.8 [3.3 to 4.4]1.7 [1.5 to 2.0]−54.31.1 [0.7 to 1.4]1.4 [1.1 to 1.6]+30.8
Daily14.6 [14.3 to 14.9]13.1 [12.7 to 13.4]−10.710.1 [9.8 to 10.5]6.1 [5.7 to 6.5]−39.84.5 [4.2 to 4.8]7.0 [6.6 to 7.4]+54.3
Age (years)4
1810.5 [9.8 to 11.2]6.5 [5.7 to 7.3]−37.97.9 [7.2 to 8.6]1.9 [1.3 to 2.5]−75.92.6 [2.0 to 3.1]4.6 [3.9 to 5.3]+79.7
2512.0 [11.6 to 12.5]8.1 [7.6 to 8.6]−32.58.4 [8.0 to 8.9]2.7 [2.4 to 3.1]−67.43.6 [3.2 to 4.0]5.3 [4.9 to 5.8]+49.0
3513.9 [13.6 to 14.3]10.2 [9.8 to 10.6]−26.89.2 [8.7 to 9.6]4.0 [3.6 to 4.3]−56.74.8 [4.5 to 5.1]6.2 [5.8 to 6.6]+29.5
4515.0 [14.6 to 15.5]11.7 [11.2 to 12.2]−22.49.8 [9.3 to 10.3]5.2 [4.7 to 5.7]−47.15.2 [4.8 to 5.6]6.4 [6.0 to 6.9]+23.7
5515.2 [14.8 to 15.6]12.4 [12.0 to 12.9]−18.110.5 [10.0 to 11.0]6.5 [6.1 to 6.9]−38.14.7 [4.3 to 5.1]6.0 [5.5 to 6.4]+26.6
6514.8 [14.2 to 15.3]12.8 [12.2 to 13.3]−13.511.2 [10.6 to 11.7]7.8 [7.3 to 8.4]−29.93.6 [3.2 to 4.0]5.0 [4.5 to 5.5]+38.8
Gender
Men14.4 [14.0 to 14.9]11.5 [11.0 to 12.0]−20.49.1 [8.7 to 9.6]5.2 [4.8 to 5.7]−42.95.3 [4.9 to 5.7]6.4 [5.9 to 6.9]+19.5
Women12.9 [12.5 to 13.2]9.5 [9.1 to 9.9]−26.49.8 [9.4 to 10.2]4.7 [4.3 to 5.0]−52.53.1 [2.8 to 3.3]4.8 [4.4 to 5.2]+57.1
Occupational social grade
ABC1 (more advantaged)12.3 [11.8 to 12.8]9.8 [9.4 to 10.3]−20.09.6 [9.1 to 10.1]5.4 [5.0 to 5.8]−43.72.7 [2.3 to 3.0]4.4 [4.1 to 4.8]+65.5
C2DE (less advantaged)14.5 [14.1 to 14.9]11.2 [10.8 to 11.7]−22.59.4 [9.0 to 9.8]4.8 [4.4 to 5.2]−49.35.1 [4.8 to 5.5]6.5 [6.1 to 7.0]+27.3
Region in England
North14.3 [13.8 to 14.8]11.3 [10.7 to 11.9]−20.910.3 [9.8 to 10.8]5.7 [5.1 to 6.2]−45.23.9 [3.5 to 4.4]5.6 [5.0 to 6.2]+42.9
Midlands13.8 [13.3 to 14.4]11.1 [10.5 to 11.8]−19.69.2 [8.6 to 9.8]4.9 [4.4 to 5.5]−46.44.6 [4.1 to 5.1]6.2 [5.6 to 6.8]+34.3
South12.8 [12.3 to 13.3]9.9 [9.4 to 10.4]−22.88.8 [8.3 to 9.3]4.7 [4.3 to 5.1]−46.84.0 [3.6 to 4.4]5.2 [4.8 to 5.7]+30.6
Current use of NRT
No13.4 [13.1 to 13.7]10.5 [10.1 to 10.8]−22.09.2 [8.8 to 9.5]5.0 [4.7 to 5.3]−45.74.3 [4.0 to 4.5]5.5 [5.2 to 5.8]+29.2
Yes14.6 [13.9 to 15.3]12.0 [10.9 to 13.1]−18.010.8 [10.0 to 11.6]5.5 [4.7 to 6.3]−49.33.8 [3.2 to 4.4]6.6 [5.5 to 7.8]+72.9
Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2
Apr 2011Sept 2023Apr 2011Sept 2023Apr 2011Sept 2023
Current vaping5
No12.5 [12.1 to 12.8]11.2 [10.7 to 11.6]−10.37.7 [7.4 to 8.1]5.5 [5.1 to 5.9]−29.34.7 [4.4 to 5.0]5.7 [5.3 to 6.1]+21.8
Yes14.3 [12.5 to 16.0]9.7 [9.1 to 10.4]−31.811.7 [9.8 to 13.5]4.3 [3.7 to 4.9]−63.32.5 [1.2 to 3.8]5.5 [4.9 to 6.2]+118.6
Non-daily15.0 [12.6 to 17.5]12.7 [10.3 to 15.0]−15.511.6 [8.9 to 14.3]5.7 [3.5 to 8.0]−50.43.3 [1.4 to 5.2]7.0 [4.5 to 9.6]+115.4
Daily13.4 [11.8 to 15.0]9.3 [7.9 to 10.6]−30.910.9 [9.2 to 12.6]4.0 [2.9 to 5.2]−62.92.5 [1.2 to 3.8]5.2 [4.0 to 6.5]+108.0
Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2Mean [95%CI]1% change2
Apr 2011Sept 2023Apr 2011Sept 2023Apr 2011Sept 2023
Current vaping5
No12.5 [12.1 to 12.8]11.2 [10.7 to 11.6]−10.37.7 [7.4 to 8.1]5.5 [5.1 to 5.9]−29.34.7 [4.4 to 5.0]5.7 [5.3 to 6.1]+21.8
Yes14.3 [12.5 to 16.0]9.7 [9.1 to 10.4]−31.811.7 [9.8 to 13.5]4.3 [3.7 to 4.9]−63.32.5 [1.2 to 3.8]5.5 [4.9 to 6.2]+118.6
Non-daily15.0 [12.6 to 17.5]12.7 [10.3 to 15.0]−15.511.6 [8.9 to 14.3]5.7 [3.5 to 8.0]−50.43.3 [1.4 to 5.2]7.0 [4.5 to 9.6]+115.4
Daily13.4 [11.8 to 15.0]9.3 [7.9 to 10.6]−30.910.9 [9.2 to 12.6]4.0 [2.9 to 5.2]−62.92.5 [1.2 to 3.8]5.2 [4.0 to 6.5]+108.0

1Data for January 2008 and September 2023 are weighted estimates in these months (the first and last in the study period) from linear regression with survey month modeled nonlinearly using restricted cubic splines (five knots). Interactions between survey month and each characteristic of interest were modeled separately to derive estimates within subgroups of smokers. Note that these estimates were derived from models incorporating information from all survey waves, not just participants surveyed in these months. Estimates are unadjusted.

2Percentage change between January 2008 and September 2023.

3Includes those mainly or exclusively smoking manufactured or hand-rolled cigarettes (defined as ≥50% of total cigarettes being manufactured or hand-rolled).

4 Note that the model used to derive these estimates included data from participants of all ages, not only those who were aged exactly 18, 25, 35, 45, 55, or 65 years.

5Vaping status has only been assessed since April 2011, so data are for April 2011 and September 2023, and the percentage change reflects the change between April 2011 and September 2023. Unmodelled estimates of mean daily cigarette consumption within each survey year are provided in  Tables S2-4.

Discussion

Between January 2008 and September 2023, the average number of cigarettes consumed by adult smokers in England decreased nonlinearly from 13.6 to 10.6 per day. At the same time, the proportion mainly or exclusively smoking hand-rolled cigarettes increased substantially. This saw the average number of manufactured cigarettes smokers consumed per day fall from 9.5 to 5.0, while the number of hand-rolled cigarettes consumed increased from 4.2 to 5.6. The decline in overall cigarette consumption was observed across all subgroups, but was greater among non-daily smokers, those who were younger, and those who currently vaped.

Annual surveys have documented a decline in the average number of cigarettes consumed per day by smokers in England.26 Our results offer a fuller picture of how changes in cigarette consumption have varied according to the type of cigarettes smoked and across subgroups of smokers. There are three key findings.

First, remaining smokers are increasingly using hand-rolled tobacco over manufactured cigarettes. In 2008, the majority (69.4%) mainly or exclusively smoked manufactured cigarettes and, collectively, smokers consumed twice as many manufactured cigarettes as hand-rolled cigarettes each day (9.5 vs. 4.2 on average). By 2023, more than half (52.1%) mainly or exclusively smoked hand-rolled cigarettes and, on average, the number of manufactured and hand-rolled cigarettes consumed each day was similar (5.0 vs. 5.6). It is likely that many smokers will have switched from more expensive manufactured cigarettes to cheaper hand-rolled cigarettes41,42 to avoid spending more on tobacco as prices have risen. A number of tax increases on tobacco products were implemented over the course of the study period.43 Previous studies have shown people who mainly smoke hand-rolled cigarettes spend substantially less on smoking each week than those who mainly smoke manufactured cigarettes,41,42 even after adjusting for any differences in the number of cigarettes smoked per day,42 and that switching to less expensive products is a common strategy used by smokers to mitigate the impact of price increases.38 It is also possible that young people may also increasingly prefer to start smoking with cheaper, hand-rolled cigarettes, although this requires further investigation. Household budgets have been affected by a cost-of-living crisis in England since late 2021 which may have provided increased motivation to use cheaper cigarettes in recent years. These results make a strong case for further higher relative tax increases on hand-rolled tobacco products to bring their cost more in line with manufactured cigarettes.

Second, the decline in overall cigarette consumption was nonlinear and has stalled in recent years. While the average number of cigarettes consumed by smokers each day fell steadily between 2008 and 2019, there was virtually no change between late 2019 and 2023. The COVID-19 pandemic may have been an influencing factor: new working-from-home arrangements are generally more permissive of more regular smoking breaks, which may have disrupted the declining trend in daily cigarette consumption. Studies that looked at cigarette consumption during COVID lockdowns suggested that while some smokers reduced their consumption, others increased theirs,44–47 which may explain the overall stagnation. Reasons for increased consumption included opportunity, stress, and boredom.44–46 The number of manufactured cigarettes consumed has continued to decline, albeit more slowly than in earlier years, but this has been offset by a continued rise in hand-rolled cigarette consumption. The mode of data collection changed from face-to-face to telephone interviews in April 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic started, which may also have contributed to the change we observed. While the two methods generally show good comparability,37,48,49 the proportion of participants with missing data on the item assessing cigarette consumption was higher among those surveyed during the pandemic than those surveyed before (5.5% vs. 1.5%).

Finally, while significant changes in cigarette consumption were observed consistently (and in the same direction) across subgroups of smokers, the extent of these changes varied. Changes in the average number of any, manufactured, and hand-rolled cigarettes smoked per day were relatively more pronounced among non-daily and younger smokers. There was both a greater overall decline in cigarette consumption, and a greater shift in product preference from manufactured to hand-rolled cigarettes, among these groups. These groups are typically less dependent50 so it is possible they may be more willing to switch products in response to price increases or other economic pressures. Longitudinal data are required to confirm this. Another potential explanation is that increasing use of e-cigarettes among young adults51 may have contributed to greater declines in cigarette consumption in this group. Consistent with this, we found patterns of cigarette consumption differed by vaping status. In 2008, dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes consumed a higher number of cigarettes per day than those who exclusively smoked, but this reversed over the study period such that by 2023, dual users reported lower consumption of cigarettes than smokers who did not vape. E-cigarettes appear to have initially attracted people who smoked more heavily52 but, over time, have either become increasingly popular among lighter smokers,53 helped people to reduce their cigarette consumption,54,55 or both. We note that while we have discussed increases in tobacco prices and vaping prevalence as potential explanations for the pattern of results we observed, there are likely to be other factors that influence young adults’ product preferences (including marketing). Qualitative research could offer more insight into these.

These findings have implications for public health. All else being equal, reduced cigarette consumption will likely carry some health benefits at the population level. Even with compensatory changes in the way people smoke (ie, smoking each cigarette harder to titrate their nicotine intake to the desired level),9 reducing the number of cigarettes they smoke each day will likely decrease the risk of disease at the individual level.2–7 Even relatively small improvements at the individual level can translate into noticeable reductions in smoking’s disease burden at a population level, with benefits for both smokers and those exposed to secondhand smoke. While average cigarette consumption has fallen over the past 15 years, this declining trend has stalled (and reversed in some population groups) since 2019. The availability of cheap, hand-rolled tobacco appears to be undermining policies that aim to reduce smoking by raising the price of tobacco (eg, through taxation) and could be targeted to reignite the decline in cigarette consumption.

Strengths of this study include the large, nationally representative sample and monthly data collection over a 15-year period. There were also limitations. First, as mentioned previously, there was a change in mode of data collection during the study period. Secondly, e-cigarette use was not assessed before April 2011, but prevalence of use in England was very low before this,56 limiting the scope to examine trends over a longer period if data had been available. In addition, the item assessing frequency of vaping did not distinguish between use of e-cigarettes specifically and use of other nicotine products. However, the majority (84.4%) of participants who were using e-cigarettes did not report use of any other nicotine products and results were virtually identical when we restricted the analysis to this group (Figure S7). Finally, as a household survey, the sample excluded people living in institutions or experiencing homelessness, so our findings may not be representative of changes in cigarette consumption among these groups.

In conclusion, the number of cigarettes smokers in England consumed each day has fallen by almost a quarter since 2008, but there has been little change since 2019. There has been a sharp decline in consumption of manufactured cigarettes and an increase in consumption of hand-rolled cigarettes, as smokers have increasingly shifted towards using hand-rolled tobacco.

Funding

Cancer Research UK (PRCRPG-Nov21\100002) funded the Smoking Toolkit Study data collection and the salaries of Sarah Jackson and Harry Tattan-Birch. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Declaration of interests

Jamie Brown has received unrestricted research funding from Pfizer and J&J, who manufacture smoking cessation medications. Lion Shahab has received honoraria for talks, an unrestricted research grant, and travel expenses to attend meetings and workshops from Pfizer, and has acted as paid reviewer for grant awarding bodies and as a paid consultant for health care companies. All authors declare no financial links with tobacco companies, e-cigarette manufacturers, or their representatives.

Author Contributions

Sarah Jackson (Conceptualization [Equal], Formal analysis [Lead], Investigation [Equal], Methodology [Equal], Visualization [Lead], Writing—original draft [Lead]), Harry Tattan-Birch (Conceptualization [Equal], Investigation [Equal], Methodology [Equal], Writing—review & editing [Equal]), Vera Buss (Conceptualization [Equal], Data curation [Lead], Investigation [Equal], Methodology [Equal], Writing—review & editing [Equal]), Lion Shahab (Conceptualization [Equal], Funding acquisition [Equal], Investigation [Equal], Methodology [Equal], Writing—review & editing [Equal]), and Jamie Brown (Conceptualization [Equal], Funding acquisition [Equal], Investigation [Equal], Methodology [Equal], Resources [Lead], Supervision [Lead], Writing—review & editing [Equal]).

Ethics Approval

Ethical approval for the STS was granted originally by the UCL Ethics Committee (ID 0498/001). The data are not collected by UCL and are anonymized when received by UCL. Consent to participate. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data Availability

Data are available on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/bg7dv/), with age provided in bands to preserve anonymity.

References

1.

Reitsma
 
MB
,
Fullman
 
N
,
Ng
 
M
, et al.  
Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015
.
Lancet
.
2017
;
389
(
10082
):
1885
1906
.

2.

Hackshaw
 
A
,
Morris
 
JK
,
Boniface
 
S
,
Tang
 
JL
,
Milenković
 
D.
 
Low cigarette consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: meta-analysis of 141 cohort studies in 55 study reports
.
BMJ
.
2018
;
360
:
j5855
. doi: https://doi.org/

3.

Bjartveit
 
K
,
Tverdal
 
A.
 
Health consequences of smoking 1–4 cigarettes per day
.
Tob Control.
 
2005
;
14
(
5
):
315
320
.

4.

Doll
 
R
,
Peto
 
R
,
Boreham
 
J
,
Sutherland
 
I.
 
Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors
.
BMJ
.
2004
;
328
(
7455
):
1519
.

5.

Shah
 
RS
,
Cole
 
JW.
 
Smoking and stroke: the more you smoke the more you stroke
.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther.
 
2010
;
8
(
7
):
917
932
.

6.

Manson
 
JE
,
Ajani
 
UA
,
Liu
 
S
,
Nathan
 
DM
,
Hennekens
 
CH.
 
A prospective study of cigarette smoking and the incidence of diabetes mellitus among us male physicians
.
Am J Med.
 
2000
;
109
(
7
):
538
542
.

7.

Pirie
 
K
,
Peto
 
R
,
Reeves
 
GK
,
Green
 
J
,
Beral
 
V
;
Million Women Study Collaborators
.
The 21st century hazards of smoking and benefits of stopping: a prospective study of one million women in the UK
.
Lancet
.
2013
;
381
(
9861
):
133
141
.

9.

Scherer
 
G.
 
Smoking behaviour and compensation: a review of the literature
.
Psychopharmacology (Berl).
 
1999
;
145
(
1
):
1
20
.

10.

Fichtenberg
 
CM
,
Glantz
 
SA.
 
Association of the California tobacco control program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease
.
N Engl J Med.
 
2000
;
343
(
24
):
1772
1777
.

11.

Jiang
 
H
,
Livingston
 
M
,
Room
 
R
,
Chenhall
 
R
,
English
 
DR.
 
Temporal associations of alcohol and tobacco consumption with cancer mortality
.
JAMA Netw Open
.
2018
;
1
(
3
):
e180713
.

12.

Yamaguchi
 
N
,
Mochizuki-Kobayashi
 
Y
,
Utsunomiya
 
O.
 
Quantitative relationship between cumulative cigarette consumption and lung cancer mortality in Japan
.
Int J Epidemiol.
 
2000
;
29
(
6
):
963
968
.

13.

Shibuya
 
K
,
Inoue
 
M
,
Lopez
 
AD.
 
Statistical modeling and projections of lung cancer mortality in 4 industrialized countries
.
Int J Cancer.
 
2005
;
117
(
3
):
476
485
.

14.

Chang
 
JT
,
Anic
 
GM
,
Rostron
 
BL
,
Tanwar
 
M
,
Chang
 
CM.
 
Cigarette smoking reduction and health risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Nicotine Tob Res.
 
2021
;
23
(
4
):
635
642
.

15.

Swayampakala
 
K
,
Thrasher
 
J
,
Carpenter
 
MJ
, et al.  
Level of cigarette consumption and quit behavior in a population of low-intensity smokers—Longitudinal results from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) survey in Mexico
.
Addict Behav.
 
2013
;
38
(
4
):
1958
1965
.

16.

Hyland
 
A
,
Rezaishiraz
 
H
,
Bauer
 
J
,
Giovino
 
GA
,
Cummings
 
KM.
 
Characteristics of low-level smokers
.
Nicotine Tob Res.
 
2005
;
7
(
3
):
461
468
.

17.

Boulos
 
DNK
,
Loffredo
 
CA
,
El Setouhy
 
M
, et al.  
Nondaily, light daily, and moderate-to-heavy cigarette smokers in a rural area of Egypt: a population-based survey
.
Nicotine Tob Res.
 
2009
;
11
(
2
):
134
138
.

18.

Cooper
 
TV
,
Taylor
 
T
,
Murray
 
A
, et al.  
Differences between intermittent and light daily smokers in a population of U.S. military recruits
.
Nicotine Tob Res.
 
2010
;
12
(
5
):
465
473
.

19.

Klemperer
 
EM
,
Hughes
 
JR
,
Naud
 
S.
 
Reduction in cigarettes per day prospectively predicts making a quit attempt: a fine-grained secondary analysis of a natural history study
.
Nicotine Tob Res.
 
2019
;
21
(
5
):
648
654
.

20.

Hughes
 
JR
,
Cummings
 
KM
,
Hyland
 
A.
 
Ability of smokers to reduce their smoking and its association with future smoking cessation
.
Addiction.
 
1999
;
94
(
1
):
109
114
.

21.

Lindson
 
N
,
Klemperer
 
E
,
Hong
 
B
,
Ordóñez‐Mena
 
JM
,
Aveyard
 
P.
 
Smoking reduction interventions for smoking cessation
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
 
2019
(
9
):
CD013183
. doi: https://doi.org/

22.

Hughes
 
JR
,
Carpenter
 
MJ.
 
Does smoking reduction increase future cessation and decrease disease risk? A qualitative review
.
Nicotine Tob Res.
 
2006
;
8
(
6
):
739
749
.

23.

Hyland
 
A
,
Levy
 
DT
,
Rezaishiraz
 
H
, et al.  
Reduction in amount smoked predicts future cessation
.
Psychol Addict Behav.
 
2005
;
19
(
2
):
221
225
.

24.

Klemperer
 
EM
,
Streck
 
JM
,
Lindson
 
N
, et al.  
A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to induce attempts to quit tobacco among adults not ready to quit
.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol.
 
2023
;
31
(
2
):
541
559
.

27.

Jackson
 
SE
,
Beard
 
E
,
Kujawski
 
B
, et al.  
Comparison of trends in self-reported cigarette consumption and sales in England, 2011 to 2018
.
JAMA Netw Open
.
2019
;
2
(
8
):
e1910161
.

28.

He
 
Y
,
Shang
 
C
,
Chaloupka
 
FJ.
 
The association between cigarette affordability and consumption: an update
.
PLoS One.
 
2018
;
13
(
12
):
e0200665
.

29.

Rothwell
 
L
,
Britton
 
J
,
Bogdanovica
 
I.
 
The relation between cigarette price and hand-rolling tobacco consumption in the UK: an ecological study
.
BMJ Open
.
2015
;
5
(
6
):
e007697
.

31.

Beard
 
E
,
Brown
 
J
,
West
 
R
, et al.  
Healthier central England or North–South divide? Analysis of national survey data on smoking and high-risk drinking
.
BMJ Open.
 
2017
;
7
(
3
):
e014210
.

32.

Pierce
 
JP
,
White
 
MM
,
Messer
 
K.
 
Changing age-specific patterns of cigarette consumption in the United States, 1992–2002: association with smoke-free homes and state-level tobacco control activity
.
Nicotine Tob Res.
 
2009
;
11
(
2
):
171
177
.

33.

Beard
 
E
,
Aveyard
 
P
,
Brown
 
J
,
West
 
R.
 
Assessing the association between the use of NRT for smoking reduction and attempts to quit smoking using propensity score matching
.
Drug Alcohol Depend.
 
2012
;
126
(
3
):
354
361
.

34.

McNeill
 
A
,
Simonavicius
 
E
,
Brose
 
LS
, et al.  
Nicotine Vaping in England: An Evidence Update Including Health Risks and Perceptions, September 2022. A Report Commissioned by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities
.
London
:
Office for Health Improvement and Disparities
;
2022
.
Accessed October 3, 2022
. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nicotine-vaping-in-england-2022-evidence-update

35.

Fidler
 
JA
,
Shahab
 
L
,
West
 
O
, et al.  
“The smoking toolkit study”: a national study of smoking and smoking cessation in England
.
BMC Public Health
.
2011
;
11
:
479
. doi: https://doi.org/

36.

Stephenson
 
CB.
 
Probability sampling with quotas: an experiment
.
Public Opinion Quarterly
.
1979
;
43
(
4
):
477
496
.

37.

Kock
 
L
,
Tattan-Birch
 
H
,
Jackson
 
S
,
Shahab
 
L
,
Brown
 
J.
 
Socio-demographic, smoking and drinking characteristics in GB: a comparison of independent telephone and face-to-face Smoking and Alcohol Toolkit surveys conducted in March 2022
.
Qeios
.
2022
. doi: https://doi.org/

38.

Kuipers
 
MA
,
Partos
 
T
,
McNeill
 
A
, et al.  
Smokers’ strategies across social grades to minimise the cost of smoking in a period with annual tax increases: evidence from a national survey in England
.
BMJ Open
.
2019
;
9
(
6
):
e026320
.

40.

Kotz
 
D
,
West
 
R.
 
Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it’s not in the trying, but in the succeeding
.
Tob Control.
 
2009
;
18
(
1
):
43
46
.

41.

Jackson
 
SE
,
Tattan-Birch
 
H
,
Shahab
 
L
,
Brown
 
J.
 
How has expenditure on nicotine products changed in a fast-evolving marketplace? A
representative population survey in England, 2018–2022
.
Nicotine Tob Res.
 
2023
;
25
(
9
):
1585
1593
. doi: https://doi.org/

42.

Jackson
 
SE
,
Shahab
 
L
,
Kock
 
L
,
West
 
R
,
Brown
 
J.
 
Expenditure on smoking and alternative nicotine delivery products: a population survey in England
.
Addiction.
 
2019
;
114
(
11
):
2026
2036
.

43.

Beard
 
E
,
Brown
 
J
,
Shahab
 
L.
 
Smoking prevalence following the announcement of tobacco tax increases in England between 2007 and 2019: an interrupted time–series analysis
.
Addiction.
 
2022
;
117
(
9
):
2481
2492
.

44.

O’Donnell
 
R
,
Eadie
 
D
,
Stead
 
M
,
Dobson
 
R
,
Semple
 
S.
 
‘I was smoking a lot more during lockdown because I Can’: a qualitative study of How UK Smokers Responded to the Covid-19 Lockdown
.
Int J Environ Res Public Health.
 
2021
;
18
(
11
):
5816
.

45.

Bommelé
 
J
,
Hopman
 
P
,
Walters
 
BH
, et al.  
The double-edged relationship between COVID-19 stress and smoking: Implications for smoking cessation
.
Tob Induc Dis
.
2020
;
18
(
July
):
63
.

46.

Carreras
 
G
,
Lugo
 
A
,
Stival
 
C
, et al.  
Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on smoking consumption in a large representative sample of Italian adults
.
Tob Control.
 
2022
;
31
(
5
):
615
622
.

47.

Nyman
 
AL
,
Spears
 
CA
,
Churchill
 
V
, et al.  
Associations between COVID-19 risk perceptions and smoking and quitting behavior among U.S. adults
.
Addict Behav Rep.
 
2021
;
14
:
100394
. doi: https://doi.org/

48.

Jackson
 
SE
,
Beard
 
E
,
Angus
 
C
,
Field
 
M
,
Brown
 
J.
 
Moderators of changes in smoking, drinking and quitting behaviour associated with the first COVID-19 lockdown in England
.
Addiction.
 
2022
;
117
(
3
):
772
783
.

49.

Jackson
 
SE
,
Garnett
 
C
,
Shahab
 
L
,
Oldham
 
M
,
Brown
 
J.
 
Association of the Covid-19 lockdown with smoking, drinking, and attempts to quit in England: an analysis of 2019-2020 data
.
Addiction.
 
2021
;
116
(
5
):
1233
1244
.

50.

Fidler
 
JA
,
Shahab
 
L
,
West
 
R.
 
Strength of urges to smoke as a measure of severity of cigarette dependence: comparison with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and its components
.
Addiction
.
2011
;
106
(
3
):
631
638
.

51.

Action on Smoking and Health
.
Use of E-Cigarettes among Adults in Great Britain
.;
2023
.
Accessed October 30, 2023
. https://ash.org.uk/resources/view/use-of-e-cigarettes-among-adults-in-great-britain-2021

52.

Maglia
 
M
,
Caponnetto
 
P
,
Di Piazza
 
J
,
La Torre
 
D
,
Polosa
 
R.
 
Dual use of electronic cigarettes and classic cigarettes: a systematic review
.
Addict Res Theory
.
2018
;
26
(
4
):
330
338
.

53.

Owusu
 
D
,
Huang
 
J
,
Weaver
 
SR
, et al.  
Patterns and trends of dual use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes among U.S. adults, 2015–2018
.
Prev Med Rep
.
2019
;
16
:
101009
. doi: https://doi.org/

54.

Jackson
 
SE
,
Farrow
 
E
,
Brown
 
J
,
Shahab
 
L.
 
Is dual use of nicotine products and cigarettes associated with smoking reduction and cessation behaviours? A prospective study in England
.
BMJ Open
.
2020
;
10
(
3
):
e036055
.

55.

Selya
 
AS
,
Shiffman
 
S
,
Greenberg
 
M
,
Augustson
 
EM.
 
Dual use of cigarettes and JUUL: Trajectory and cigarette consumption
.
Am J Health Behav.
 
2021
;
45
(
3
):
464
485
.

56.

Buss
 
V
,
West
 
R
,
Kock
 
L
,
Kale
 
D
,
Brown
 
J.
 
Monthly trends on smoking in England from the Smoking Toolkit Study
.
2023
.
Accessed February 8, 2023
. https://smokinginengland.info/graphs/monthly-tracking-kpi

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.