Abstract

Background and Aims

Kidney macrophages have been implicated in interstitial fibrosis and inflammation in various forms of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but subsets with different markers and putative functions have been identified through the application of single cell technologies. A recent study from the Greka Lab revealed distinct macrophage populations in the human kidney bearing lymphatic endothelium hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE1) and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2). Notably, TREM2+ macrophages, which have been implicated in limiting metabolic toxicity in chronic diseases, were enriched in diabetic mouse kidneys and human kidneys from obese individuals (Subramanian et al. BioRvix 2021). To support these findings, we aimed at characterizing LYVE1+ and TREM2+ macrophages in kidney samples taken from subjects with CKD-associated co-morbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity.

Method

We performed immunofluorescence microscopy of samples collected from the cortex of kidneys donated for transplantation but deemed unsuitable for implantation. Each sample was stained with anti-CD163, -LYVE1, and -TREM2 antibodies, plus Hoechst to stain nuclei. Two identically sized fields of view were imaged in each sample. Macrophages were identified based on CD163 expression and the expression of the LYVE1 and TREM2 in macrophages delineated. Macrophage subsets were compared according to age, BMI, eGFR and the presence of hypertension, obesity and diabetes.

Results

of 49 donors assessed, 19 (39%) were “healthy”, six (12%) “hypertensive” without obesity or diabetes, 16 (33%) “obese” with no evidence of diabetes, and 8 (16%) “diabetic” (all had type 2 diabetes and 6/8 were also obese) The median eGFR at donation was 95 mL/min/1.73 m2 and none of the donors had a history of CKD. Gender, median age and cause of death were not significantly different as well (Table 1). “Healthy”, “hypertensive” and “obese” donors had similar numbers of total macrophages, LYVE1+ and TREM2+ macrophages per region of interest. In contrast, “diabetic” subjects had a tendency towards a higher macrophage count (P = .10) and significantly higher numbers of LYVE1+ (P = .02) and TREM2+ macrophages (P = .002), compared to “healthy” ones (see Figure 1). The median LYVE1+/CD163+ ratio was 0.69 and did not differ substantially between the groups (P = .18), while the TREM2+/CD163+ ratio was higher among “diabetic” compared to “healthy” donors (0.43 vs 0.34, P = .06).

Table 1:

Main donors’ demographic and clinical characteristics.

All
N = 49
Healthy (A)
N = 19
HTN (B)
N = 6
P value
A vs B
Obese (C)
N = 16
P value
A vs C
Diabetic (D)
N = 8
P value
A vs D
Male, n (%)32 (65)11 (58)3 (50)112 (75)0.476 (75)0.66
Age, median (IQR) –years61 (49-70)49 (28-64)64 (58-74)0.0862 (58-70)0.7669 (58-72)0.15
Cause of death
Cerebral event, n (%)
Cardiorespiratory, n (%)
Trauma, n (%)
Other, n (%)

34 (69)
10 (20)
4 (8)
1 (2)

10 (53)
5 (26)
3 (16)
1 (5)

5 (83)
1 (17)
0
0

0.34
1
0.55
1

12 (75)
3 (19)
1 (6)
0

0.29
0.70
0.60
1

7 (87)
1 (13)
0
0

0.18
0.63
0.53
1
eGFR at admission, median (IQR) – mL/min/1.73 m295 (85-111)93 (81-111)110 (103-114)0.3094 (88-104)0.9696 (90-101)0.89
Arterial hypertension, n (%)25 (51)06 (100)<0.00113 (81)<0.0016 (75)<0.001
BMI, median (IQR)27 (24-32)25 (21-27)24 (22-28)0.9533 (32-35)<0.00132 (28-34)0.012
22 (45)00116 (100)<0.0016 (75)<0.001
Diabetes, n (%)8 (16)001018 (100)<0.001
All
N = 49
Healthy (A)
N = 19
HTN (B)
N = 6
P value
A vs B
Obese (C)
N = 16
P value
A vs C
Diabetic (D)
N = 8
P value
A vs D
Male, n (%)32 (65)11 (58)3 (50)112 (75)0.476 (75)0.66
Age, median (IQR) –years61 (49-70)49 (28-64)64 (58-74)0.0862 (58-70)0.7669 (58-72)0.15
Cause of death
Cerebral event, n (%)
Cardiorespiratory, n (%)
Trauma, n (%)
Other, n (%)

34 (69)
10 (20)
4 (8)
1 (2)

10 (53)
5 (26)
3 (16)
1 (5)

5 (83)
1 (17)
0
0

0.34
1
0.55
1

12 (75)
3 (19)
1 (6)
0

0.29
0.70
0.60
1

7 (87)
1 (13)
0
0

0.18
0.63
0.53
1
eGFR at admission, median (IQR) – mL/min/1.73 m295 (85-111)93 (81-111)110 (103-114)0.3094 (88-104)0.9696 (90-101)0.89
Arterial hypertension, n (%)25 (51)06 (100)<0.00113 (81)<0.0016 (75)<0.001
BMI, median (IQR)27 (24-32)25 (21-27)24 (22-28)0.9533 (32-35)<0.00132 (28-34)0.012
22 (45)00116 (100)<0.0016 (75)<0.001
Diabetes, n (%)8 (16)001018 (100)<0.001

BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range; HTN, hypertensive

Table 1:

Main donors’ demographic and clinical characteristics.

All
N = 49
Healthy (A)
N = 19
HTN (B)
N = 6
P value
A vs B
Obese (C)
N = 16
P value
A vs C
Diabetic (D)
N = 8
P value
A vs D
Male, n (%)32 (65)11 (58)3 (50)112 (75)0.476 (75)0.66
Age, median (IQR) –years61 (49-70)49 (28-64)64 (58-74)0.0862 (58-70)0.7669 (58-72)0.15
Cause of death
Cerebral event, n (%)
Cardiorespiratory, n (%)
Trauma, n (%)
Other, n (%)

34 (69)
10 (20)
4 (8)
1 (2)

10 (53)
5 (26)
3 (16)
1 (5)

5 (83)
1 (17)
0
0

0.34
1
0.55
1

12 (75)
3 (19)
1 (6)
0

0.29
0.70
0.60
1

7 (87)
1 (13)
0
0

0.18
0.63
0.53
1
eGFR at admission, median (IQR) – mL/min/1.73 m295 (85-111)93 (81-111)110 (103-114)0.3094 (88-104)0.9696 (90-101)0.89
Arterial hypertension, n (%)25 (51)06 (100)<0.00113 (81)<0.0016 (75)<0.001
BMI, median (IQR)27 (24-32)25 (21-27)24 (22-28)0.9533 (32-35)<0.00132 (28-34)0.012
22 (45)00116 (100)<0.0016 (75)<0.001
Diabetes, n (%)8 (16)001018 (100)<0.001
All
N = 49
Healthy (A)
N = 19
HTN (B)
N = 6
P value
A vs B
Obese (C)
N = 16
P value
A vs C
Diabetic (D)
N = 8
P value
A vs D
Male, n (%)32 (65)11 (58)3 (50)112 (75)0.476 (75)0.66
Age, median (IQR) –years61 (49-70)49 (28-64)64 (58-74)0.0862 (58-70)0.7669 (58-72)0.15
Cause of death
Cerebral event, n (%)
Cardiorespiratory, n (%)
Trauma, n (%)
Other, n (%)

34 (69)
10 (20)
4 (8)
1 (2)

10 (53)
5 (26)
3 (16)
1 (5)

5 (83)
1 (17)
0
0

0.34
1
0.55
1

12 (75)
3 (19)
1 (6)
0

0.29
0.70
0.60
1

7 (87)
1 (13)
0
0

0.18
0.63
0.53
1
eGFR at admission, median (IQR) – mL/min/1.73 m295 (85-111)93 (81-111)110 (103-114)0.3094 (88-104)0.9696 (90-101)0.89
Arterial hypertension, n (%)25 (51)06 (100)<0.00113 (81)<0.0016 (75)<0.001
BMI, median (IQR)27 (24-32)25 (21-27)24 (22-28)0.9533 (32-35)<0.00132 (28-34)0.012
22 (45)00116 (100)<0.0016 (75)<0.001
Diabetes, n (%)8 (16)001018 (100)<0.001

BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range; HTN, hypertensive

Conclusion

Diabetes is associated with an increase in kidney macrophages, particularly in those expressing TREM2. Further investigation is required to determine the role these cells may play in CKD progression.

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.