Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

An adequately functioning catheter is of vital importance for successful long-term treatment and technique survival to peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. According to the 2021 International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines on membrane function, catheter drainage problems should be suspected first in patients with low ultrafiltration (UF) capacity. Catheter dysfunction and the consequent decrease in UF are frequent complications in PD patients associated with significant negative clinical outcomes.

METHOD

We introduce the use of a combination of parameters obtained from daily measurements of the cycler software PD Link (Baxter) for predicting catheter dysfunction in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients. Out of 117 APD patients treated at the Medical University of Vienna from 2015 to 2021, we identified all patients with verified catheter malposition and dysfunction (n = 14, cases) and compared them to controls without clinical evidence of mechanical problems and a recent X-ray confirming position of the PD catheter tip in the recto-vesical/recto-uterine space (n = 19). We retrieved cycler data for 7 days each and tested parameters predictive capability of catheter dysfunction.

RESULTS

Total number of alarms/week >7 as single predictive parameter of catheter dislocation identified 85.7% (sensitivity) of patients with dislocated catheter and 31.6% (1—specificity) of control patients. A combination of two out of three parameters (number of alarms/week >7,  drain time >22 min,  UF of last fill <150 mL) identified the same proportion of patients with catheter dislocation, but was more accurate in identifying controls (21% false positive).

CONCLUSION

We confirmed our clinical impression that number of alarms, total drain time at the end of cycler session and UF of last fill are good predictors for mechanical drainage problems. In contrast to yearly peritoneal equilibration test measurements, these data provide valuable information for clinical management of PD patients on a daily base and will be easily available in new APD cyclers with devices connected to remote monitoring platforms.

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the parameters obtained from APD cycler card management software incases and controls. The red arrow indicates the point corresponding to the cut-off value selected. AUC= area under the curve. a. Total number of alarms per week; b. Total drain time at the end of cycler session; c. Mean net UF of last fill.
FIGURE 1:

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the parameters obtained from APD cycler card management software incases and controls. The red arrow indicates the point corresponding to the cut-off value selected. AUC= area under the curve. a. Total number of alarms per week; b. Total drain time at the end of cycler session; c. Mean net UF of last fill.

Table 1.

Clinical parameters assessed from the APD cycler card management software in cases and controls

graphic
graphic
Table 1.

Clinical parameters assessed from the APD cycler card management software in cases and controls

graphic
graphic

REFERENCES

1.

Morelle J, Stachowska-Pietka J, Öberg C et al. ISPD recommendations for the evaluation of peritoneal membrane dysfunction in adults: Classification, measurement, interpretation and rationale for intervention. Perit Dial Int. 2021 Feb 10:896860820982218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860820982218. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33 563 110

2.

Crabtree JH. Selected best demonstrated practices in peritoneal dialysis access. Kidney Int Suppl. 2006 Nov; (103): S27–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5001913. PMID: 17 080 108

3.

Crabtree JH, Shrestha BM, Chow KM et al. Creating and Maintaining Optimal Peritoneal Dialysis Access in the Adult Patient: 2019 Update. Perit Dial Int. 2019 Sep-Oct;39(5):414–36. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2018.00232. Epub 2019 Apr 26. PMID: 31 028 108

4.

Neri L, Viglino G, Cappelletti A et al. Evaluation of drainage times and alarms with various automated peritoneal dialysis modalities. Adv Perit Dial. 2001;17:72–4. PMID: 11 510 301. https://www.advancesinpd.com/adv01/15Neri.htm

5.

Drepper VJ, Martin PY, Chopard CS et al. Remote Patient Management in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: A Promising New Tool. Perit Dial Int. 2018 Jan-Feb;38(1):76–8. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2017.00054. PMID: 29 311 200

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.