-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Belén Marrón, Janusz Ostrowski, Marietta Török, Delia Timofte, Michael Roesch, Claudia Martín, Ignacio de León-Ponce de León, Pawel Kochman, Attila Orosz, Dan Munteanu, Jörgen Hegbrant, Peritoneal Dialysis-DMTs Diaverum Group, SP790
IMPACT OF DECISION MAKING TOOLS ON HIGHER PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CHOICE AND TAKE-ON IS RELATED TO CENTER EXPERIENCE IN AN INTERNATIONAL SETTING, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Volume 33, Issue suppl_1, May 2018, Page i614, https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy104.SP790 - Share Icon Share
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Use of Decision Making Tools (DMTs) facilitates an optimal modality information process and increases peritoneal dialysis (PD) incidence. However, other factors may contribute to PD take-on. Objectives: To analyze the impact of clinic PD experience on PD take-on in patients (pts) receiving a structured modality information program with the use of DMTs.
METHODS:Observational, prospective, open and international registry. All predialysis CKD G4-G5 pts and pts after an unplanned dialysis start (if non-informed before) were recruited to undergo a DMTs process for renal replacement therapy (RRT) choice, including personal values evaluation, RRT information with different aids, staff deliberation support and patient modality election. Clinics with ≥ 15 continuous annual prevalent PD pts (more experienced) were compared with clinics with 0-14 prevalent PD pts (less experienced).
RESULTS: 1934 pts from in total 49 clinics (cl) in Poland (987 pts, 19 cl), Hungary (338 pts, 10 cl), Romania (311 pts, 12 cl), Germany (259 pts, 7 cl), and Argentina (39 pts, 1 cl) aimed modality information between Aug 2014-June 2017. Large differences were observed between more PD-experienced clinics in PD choice (55%) and PD take-on (49%) and less PD-experienced clinics (14% and 12%, respectively), despite a similar use of DMT kits (more results in table).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of DMTs facilitates patient empowerment but its impact on PD choice and take-on is reduced in clinics with less experience of the technique.
Results comparison: more experienced PD clinics vs. less experienced
. | Total . | Clinics 0-14 pts. . | Clinics ≥15 pts. . | p value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinics (n) | 49 | 34 | 15 | |
Total (n) | 1934 | 1138 | 796 | |
Mean age (y.) | 61.2 | 64.7 | 59.8 | 0.02 |
PD contraindicated (%) | 29 | 37 | 18 | 0.00 |
HD/PD candidates (n) | 1377 | 717 | 652 | |
Mean age (y.) | 60.2 | 63.1 | 59.4 | 0.00 |
Early referral (≥3m.) % | 52 | 47 | 57 | 0.15 |
DMTs kit use (%) | 93 | 94 | 92 | 0.57 |
Home orientation (%) | 44 | 27 | 63 | 0.00 |
PD choice (%) | 33 | 14 | 55 | 0.00 |
PD 1st sesión (%) | 21 | 9 | 34 | 0.00 |
PD chronic (%) | 29 | 12 | 49 | 0.00 |
. | Total . | Clinics 0-14 pts. . | Clinics ≥15 pts. . | p value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinics (n) | 49 | 34 | 15 | |
Total (n) | 1934 | 1138 | 796 | |
Mean age (y.) | 61.2 | 64.7 | 59.8 | 0.02 |
PD contraindicated (%) | 29 | 37 | 18 | 0.00 |
HD/PD candidates (n) | 1377 | 717 | 652 | |
Mean age (y.) | 60.2 | 63.1 | 59.4 | 0.00 |
Early referral (≥3m.) % | 52 | 47 | 57 | 0.15 |
DMTs kit use (%) | 93 | 94 | 92 | 0.57 |
Home orientation (%) | 44 | 27 | 63 | 0.00 |
PD choice (%) | 33 | 14 | 55 | 0.00 |
PD 1st sesión (%) | 21 | 9 | 34 | 0.00 |
PD chronic (%) | 29 | 12 | 49 | 0.00 |
Results comparison: more experienced PD clinics vs. less experienced
. | Total . | Clinics 0-14 pts. . | Clinics ≥15 pts. . | p value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinics (n) | 49 | 34 | 15 | |
Total (n) | 1934 | 1138 | 796 | |
Mean age (y.) | 61.2 | 64.7 | 59.8 | 0.02 |
PD contraindicated (%) | 29 | 37 | 18 | 0.00 |
HD/PD candidates (n) | 1377 | 717 | 652 | |
Mean age (y.) | 60.2 | 63.1 | 59.4 | 0.00 |
Early referral (≥3m.) % | 52 | 47 | 57 | 0.15 |
DMTs kit use (%) | 93 | 94 | 92 | 0.57 |
Home orientation (%) | 44 | 27 | 63 | 0.00 |
PD choice (%) | 33 | 14 | 55 | 0.00 |
PD 1st sesión (%) | 21 | 9 | 34 | 0.00 |
PD chronic (%) | 29 | 12 | 49 | 0.00 |
. | Total . | Clinics 0-14 pts. . | Clinics ≥15 pts. . | p value . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinics (n) | 49 | 34 | 15 | |
Total (n) | 1934 | 1138 | 796 | |
Mean age (y.) | 61.2 | 64.7 | 59.8 | 0.02 |
PD contraindicated (%) | 29 | 37 | 18 | 0.00 |
HD/PD candidates (n) | 1377 | 717 | 652 | |
Mean age (y.) | 60.2 | 63.1 | 59.4 | 0.00 |
Early referral (≥3m.) % | 52 | 47 | 57 | 0.15 |
DMTs kit use (%) | 93 | 94 | 92 | 0.57 |
Home orientation (%) | 44 | 27 | 63 | 0.00 |
PD choice (%) | 33 | 14 | 55 | 0.00 |
PD 1st sesión (%) | 21 | 9 | 34 | 0.00 |
PD chronic (%) | 29 | 12 | 49 | 0.00 |
Comments