-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Eunghyun Lee, Jungho Shin, Jin Ho Hwang, Su Hyun Kim, FP544
IMPACT OF INTRADIALYTIC BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES ON CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IS INDEPENDENT FROM VOLUME STATUS ASSESSED BY BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS IN MAINTENANCE HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Volume 33, Issue suppl_1, May 2018, Page i223, https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy104.FP544 - Share Icon Share
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Changes in blood pressure (BP) frequently occur during the hemodialysis treatment, and large decline or rise in BP are associated with worsened cardiovascular outcomes. Intradialytic BP changes are known to be related with volume status, however, it remains uncertain whether impacts of BP changes on adverse outcomes depend on volume status. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the associations between changes in BP during hemodialysis and cardiovascular outcomes after the adjustment for volume status assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in maintenance hemodialysis.
METHODS: We defined change in systolic BP (Δ systolic BP) as post-dialysis systolic BP minus pre-dialysis systolic BP, and we estimated volume status as the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) using a BIA device. Incidences of cardiovascular events and mortality were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were divided into three groups: 82 (60.3%) with Δ systolic BP −20 to 10 mmHg, 21 (15.4%) with Δ systolic BP ≤−20 mmHg, and 33 (24.3%) with Δ systolic BP ≥10 mmHg, and were followed for a median of 34 (19, 64) months. Patients whose Δ systolic BP ≥10 mmHg had higher pre- and post-dialysis ECW/TBW than the others (P = 0.007 and 0.001). Cardiovascular events more frequently occurred in patients with Δ systolic BP ≤−20 mmHg or ≥10 mmHg than those with Δ systolic BP −20 to 10 mmHg (HR 2.3 and 3.0; P = 0.062 and 0.006), and these associations persisted even after the adjustment of pre-dialysis ECW/TBW (P = 0.047 and 0.014). Moreover, Δ systolic BP ≥10 mmHg was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality independent of pre-dialysis ECW/TBW (P = 0.025). We did not find the association between Δ systolic BP ≤−20 mmHg and cardiovascular mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that volume status-independent association between rise in systolic BP during hemodialysis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. On the other hand, large decline in systolic BP was associated with cardiovascular events independent of volume status, but was not with cardiovascular mortality. Given these findings, other factors related to changes in BP during hemodialysis, such as autonomic or endothelial dysfunction, are investigated to manage these complications, in addition to appropriate volume control.
Comments