-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Aleksei Zulkarnaev, MP872
RICHARD BRIGHT AND THE DISCOVERY OF KIDNEY DISEASE, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Volume 32, Issue suppl_3, May 2017, Page iii39, https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx112.MP872 - Share Icon Share
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Nephrology became a separate clinical specialty only in the early second half of the XX century.
METHODS: Richard Bright is rightly considered it’s “founding father”. Without undermining his achievement, it has to be mentioned that back in V-IV century BC Hippocrates noticed that some symptoms seemed to be linked to kidney disease, having concluded: «Bubbles appearing on the surface of the urine indicate diseases of the kidneys and a prolonged illness». In the Ist century BC a disciple of Hippocrates - Rufus of Ephesus published a treatise on Diseases of the Bladder and Kidneys, where he writes that kidney sclerosis may occur painlessly, but causes oedema. In I-II centuries, Avicenna also associated kidney sclerosis with chronic disease.
RESULTS: In his work (1527), Paracelsus mentions that in some patients adding wine or vinegar to their urine may produce a milky precipitate. Frederick Dekkers from Leiden (in the year 1694) also found that samples of urine, when heated produce a precipitate. Although Dekkers described patients with hydrosarca, he did not associate this condition with the changes in urine. Conversely, nearly seventy years later (1765) Domenico Cotugno described a 28-year-old patient with fever and hydrosarca, whose urine and transudate also produced a precipitate on heating. Around the same time, Rosen von Rosenstein described the course of scarlet fever “with oedema and haematuria”. Richard Bright has not founded nephrology out of nowhere. By that time, here was already some knowledge about kidney diseases, but this was not systematic. The most valued contribution of R. Bright to nephrology is his systematic comparison and collation of the clinical signs and presentation with the histological changes in the renal tissues of deceased patients. This allowed him to differentiate between different forms of pathology of the renal parenchyma. R. Bright described acute nephritis, nephrosis (nephrotic syndrome), uraemia, small contracted and large swollen kidneys, and also noted the link between kidney disease and an enlarged left ventricle as an indirect sign of hypertension (the first sphygmogaph was not invented until 1854 by Karl von Vierordt, and the first blood pressure monitor - a sphygmanometer was invented by Scipione Riva-Rocci in 1896). In his important work " Reports in medical...", published in 1827, not only did Bright describe the clinical picture of kidney disease, the clinical and anatomic features, but also the changes in lab indicators by identifying the protein in blood and urine. R. Bright described in detail the condition which is currently known as “nephrotic syndrome”, but for nearly one hundred years was known as “Bright’s disease”. The results of histological studies in deceased patients with oedema and albuminuria were heterogenous, thus the scientist concluded that similar clinical symptoms may be caused by different diseases. Some of the kidney specimens, made by R. Bright, have been preserved and are kept at Guy’s hospital in London. One of these presents the typical mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis, another - amyloid disease in a patient, suffering from tuberculosis lung disease. It is interesting that Bright’s colleagues included the great doctors and scientists - Thomas Hodgkin and Thomas Addison. Currently, nephrology is not limited to only the classical Bright’s disease, but also comprises both an impressive spectrum of true renal diseases and systemic processes of extrarenal disease, which involves kidney injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Richard Bright died on 16th December 1858 at the age of 69 years from heart disease and was buried in Kensal Green. He remains in history as the person who once and for all changed medicine of his time, leaving behind him a great heritage.
Comments