-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
David Warnock, João Oliveira, Daniel Bichet, Han-Wook Yoo, Daniel Gruskin, Robert Hopkin, Roberta Lemay, Juan Politei, Christoph Wanner, William Wilcox, Dominique Germain, SP023
CLASSIFICATION OF MALE FABRY PATIENTS: VALIDATION OF GROUP CONSENSUS BY SURVIVOR ANALYSIS FOR MAJOR CLINICAL EVENTS, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Volume 32, Issue suppl_3, May 2017, Page iii113, https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx138.SP023 - Share Icon Share
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder with marked allelic and phenotypic heterogeneity. The “fabry-database.org” database reports phenotype classifications of numerous GLA mutations, most of which occur in one or few families. Stratification by patients’ genotypes and phenotype is needed for current and future clinical studies.
METHODS: A multi-specialty Fabry genotype-phenotype working group (WG) classified phenotypes of adult males with GLA mutations reported to the Fabry Registry (NCT00196742; sponsor: Sanofi Genzyme) for ≥ 4 patients that remained unclassified in the “fabry-database.org” database. Using an iterative process, the WG agreed on criteria to classify phenotypes: expert clinical judgment, published literature, and clinical evidence of mutation severity. The Kaplan-Meier severe clinical event-free survival curve method was used to validate the final classification consensus (event: composite of renal, cardiac, cerebrovascular events, and death).
RESULTS: 43 previously unclassified GLA mutations (300 adult male Fabry patients, average 7 males/mutation) qualified for inclusion. Preliminary consensus (classic, nonclassic, uncertain, or polymorphism) was achieved based on individual expert assessments. A 2-point scoring system (characteristic Fabry symptoms: angiokeratoma, cornea verticillata; Fabry Registry data) was used for initial process validation. Final consensus was achieved for 42/43 mutations based on preliminary phenotype consensus, the updated “fabry-database.org” report, and the 2-point Registry scoring scale. Final classifications included: classic, 30 mutations (192 males); nonclassic, 11 (100 males); uncertain, 1 (4 males); benign polymorphism, 1 (4 males). Comparison of event-free survival for male patients enrolled in the Fabry Registry based on available “fabry-database.org” classic/nonclassic classifications to survival after inclusion of the WG consensus re-classification of 42 unknown “fabry-database.org” classifications in the analysis showed similar separation of the curves for patients within the mutation categories (p-values <0.01; median time-to-event in classic vs. nonclassic patients 46.8 and 64.6 years and 46.7 and 63.4 years, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This validated approach toward classification of phenotypes may aid in analyzing Fabry Registry clinical outcome data from cohorts of male patients with classic and nonclassic Fabry mutations in the future.Funding: Sanofi Genzyme.
Comments