Introduction and Aims: To investigate the potential of the orally administered complement 5a receptor inhibitor CCX168 to substantially or completely replace steroids while maintaining or improving efficacy in patients with active ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) receiving cyclophosphamide (CYC) or rituximab (RTX).

Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial (CLEAR) in 11 European countries included 3 groups: (1) High dose steroids standard of care (SOC) control: Placebo + CYC or RTX + 60 mg starting dose of prednisone, (2) CCX168 30 mg b.i.d. + CYC or RTX + 20 mg starting dose of prednisone, or (3) CCX168 30 mg b.i.d. + CYC or RTX + no prednisone. The CYC regimen was 15 mg/kg IV q2 to 4 weeks. The RTX regimen was 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint compared each CCX168 group to SOC control, based on Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) response, defined as BVAS decrease from baseline of ≥50% and no worsening in any body system. Eligible patients had GPA, MPA, or renal limited vasculitis and PR3 or MPO-ANCA positivity.

Results: 67 patients were enrolled. The table shows baseline characteristics and efficacy results at Week 12. Groups were well balanced. The study met its primary endpoint: BVAS response at week 12 was numerically superior and statistically non-inferior to SOC control (P = 0.002 and P = 0.01 for each CCX168 group vs. control). Three of 22 (14%) and 6 of 21 (29%) patients in the low and no steroids CCX168 groups, respectively, and 1 of 20 (5%) on SOC had BVAS remission at Week 4 and 12, showing a more rapid and sustained response with CCX168. The CCX168 treatment groups performed better than SOC for most of the secondary endpoints (see table). Health-related quality of life measurements improved more with CCX168 vs. SOC. CCX168 was well tolerated. One serious adverse reaction of pneumonia (SOC), one of hepatic and pancreatic enzyme elevations in a patient with a history of alcohol abuse who also received CYC, cotrimoxazole, and pantoprazole (CCX168), and one of worsening renal function in a patient who had rapidly declining renal function prior to study entry (CCX168) were observed.

Conclusions: CCX168 successfully replaced chronic steroids suggesting a new treatment paradigm for AAV, with the same or better efficacy compared to SOC. These results provide a clear path to Phase 3 and suggest that the well-known serious side effects of chronic steroid treatment can likely be avoided in AAV treatment.

CCX168 + CYC/RTX + Low-Dose SteroidsCCX168 + CYC/RTX + No SteroidsHigh Dose Steroids + CYC/RTX SOC
Demographics and baseline characteristics in Safety PopulationN = 22N = 22N = 23
Age, mean ± SD; Male %57 ± 14; 64%57 ± 14; 73%59 ± 14; 74%
Newly diagnosed/relapsing disease68%/32%73%/27%78%/22%
MPO+/PR3+/Both MPO+ and PR3+ ANCA (%)45%/36%/14%41%/36%/14%26%/48%/22%
BVAS, mean ± SD14.3 ± 6.013.8 ± 6.413.2 ± 5.8
Efficacy results (at 12 Weeks) in Intent-to-Treat PopulationN = 22N = 21N = 20
BVAS Response, n (%) 119 (86%) **17 (81%) *14 (70%)
BVAS Total, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-79 ± 14 %-73 ± 7 %-57 ± 14 %
BVAS Renal, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-77 ± 6 %-62 ± 9 %-53 ± 14 %
BVAS Non-Renal, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-87 ± 9 %-92 ± 5 % #-54 ± 19 %
BVAS Remission, n (%) 210 (46%)7 (33%)8 (40%)
BVAS Remission at Week 4 and 123 (14%)6 (29%)1 (5%)
U-ACR, mean % change 3,4-56% ##-44%-21%
eGFR, mean ± SEM 5 Baseline, Week 12 (mL/min/1.73 m2)52.5 ± 5.7 , 56.2 ± 4.354.8 ± 4.4 , 56.1 ± 5.247.2 ± 3.5 , 52.8 ± 3.6
U-RBC count, mean % change 4,6-83%-85%-92%
Urinary MCP-1/creatinine, mean % change 4,7-70% ##-49%-43%
EuroQOL-5D-5L VAS, mean ± SEM 8 Baseline, Week 1265 ± 5 , 75 ± 5 †69 ± 6 , 78 ± 469 ± 5 , 66 ± 5
SF-36 v2 Physical Functioning, mean ± SEM 9 Baseline, Week 1268 ± 8 , 84 ± 474 ± 11 , 93 ± 3 †67 ± 7 , 72 ± 4
SF-36 v2 Mental Health, mean ± SEM Baseline, Week 1262 ± 5 , 79 ± 6 ††82 ± 7 , 89 ± 4 ††66 ± 5 , 65 ± 5
CCX168 + CYC/RTX + Low-Dose SteroidsCCX168 + CYC/RTX + No SteroidsHigh Dose Steroids + CYC/RTX SOC
Demographics and baseline characteristics in Safety PopulationN = 22N = 22N = 23
Age, mean ± SD; Male %57 ± 14; 64%57 ± 14; 73%59 ± 14; 74%
Newly diagnosed/relapsing disease68%/32%73%/27%78%/22%
MPO+/PR3+/Both MPO+ and PR3+ ANCA (%)45%/36%/14%41%/36%/14%26%/48%/22%
BVAS, mean ± SD14.3 ± 6.013.8 ± 6.413.2 ± 5.8
Efficacy results (at 12 Weeks) in Intent-to-Treat PopulationN = 22N = 21N = 20
BVAS Response, n (%) 119 (86%) **17 (81%) *14 (70%)
BVAS Total, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-79 ± 14 %-73 ± 7 %-57 ± 14 %
BVAS Renal, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-77 ± 6 %-62 ± 9 %-53 ± 14 %
BVAS Non-Renal, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-87 ± 9 %-92 ± 5 % #-54 ± 19 %
BVAS Remission, n (%) 210 (46%)7 (33%)8 (40%)
BVAS Remission at Week 4 and 123 (14%)6 (29%)1 (5%)
U-ACR, mean % change 3,4-56% ##-44%-21%
eGFR, mean ± SEM 5 Baseline, Week 12 (mL/min/1.73 m2)52.5 ± 5.7 , 56.2 ± 4.354.8 ± 4.4 , 56.1 ± 5.247.2 ± 3.5 , 52.8 ± 3.6
U-RBC count, mean % change 4,6-83%-85%-92%
Urinary MCP-1/creatinine, mean % change 4,7-70% ##-49%-43%
EuroQOL-5D-5L VAS, mean ± SEM 8 Baseline, Week 1265 ± 5 , 75 ± 5 †69 ± 6 , 78 ± 469 ± 5 , 66 ± 5
SF-36 v2 Physical Functioning, mean ± SEM 9 Baseline, Week 1268 ± 8 , 84 ± 474 ± 11 , 93 ± 3 †67 ± 7 , 72 ± 4
SF-36 v2 Mental Health, mean ± SEM Baseline, Week 1262 ± 5 , 79 ± 6 ††82 ± 7 , 89 ± 4 ††66 ± 5 , 65 ± 5

1 Primary endpoint; BVAS response: ≥ 50% decrease from baseline and no worsening in any body system; 4 patients were excluded from the ITT population since they had no post baseline on-treatment BVAS measurements; 2 BVAS remission defined as BVAS of zero; 3 U-ACR = first morning urinary albumin:creatinine ratio; 4 percentage change based on ratio of geometric means, Week 12/Baseline; 5 estimated glomerular filtration rate from MDRD equation based on serum creatinine; 6 based on microscopic count of urinary RBC; 7 First morning urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein-1:creatinine ratio; 8 Euro Quality-of-Life 5-Domain 5-Level visual analogue scale; 9 Short Form-36 version 2 health survey; ** P = 0.002, * P = 0.01 for test of non-inferiority vs. control; ## P < 0.01, # P < 0.05 for superiority vs control; †† P < 0.01, † P < 0.05 for % change from baseline vs control.

CCX168 + CYC/RTX + Low-Dose SteroidsCCX168 + CYC/RTX + No SteroidsHigh Dose Steroids + CYC/RTX SOC
Demographics and baseline characteristics in Safety PopulationN = 22N = 22N = 23
Age, mean ± SD; Male %57 ± 14; 64%57 ± 14; 73%59 ± 14; 74%
Newly diagnosed/relapsing disease68%/32%73%/27%78%/22%
MPO+/PR3+/Both MPO+ and PR3+ ANCA (%)45%/36%/14%41%/36%/14%26%/48%/22%
BVAS, mean ± SD14.3 ± 6.013.8 ± 6.413.2 ± 5.8
Efficacy results (at 12 Weeks) in Intent-to-Treat PopulationN = 22N = 21N = 20
BVAS Response, n (%) 119 (86%) **17 (81%) *14 (70%)
BVAS Total, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-79 ± 14 %-73 ± 7 %-57 ± 14 %
BVAS Renal, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-77 ± 6 %-62 ± 9 %-53 ± 14 %
BVAS Non-Renal, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-87 ± 9 %-92 ± 5 % #-54 ± 19 %
BVAS Remission, n (%) 210 (46%)7 (33%)8 (40%)
BVAS Remission at Week 4 and 123 (14%)6 (29%)1 (5%)
U-ACR, mean % change 3,4-56% ##-44%-21%
eGFR, mean ± SEM 5 Baseline, Week 12 (mL/min/1.73 m2)52.5 ± 5.7 , 56.2 ± 4.354.8 ± 4.4 , 56.1 ± 5.247.2 ± 3.5 , 52.8 ± 3.6
U-RBC count, mean % change 4,6-83%-85%-92%
Urinary MCP-1/creatinine, mean % change 4,7-70% ##-49%-43%
EuroQOL-5D-5L VAS, mean ± SEM 8 Baseline, Week 1265 ± 5 , 75 ± 5 †69 ± 6 , 78 ± 469 ± 5 , 66 ± 5
SF-36 v2 Physical Functioning, mean ± SEM 9 Baseline, Week 1268 ± 8 , 84 ± 474 ± 11 , 93 ± 3 †67 ± 7 , 72 ± 4
SF-36 v2 Mental Health, mean ± SEM Baseline, Week 1262 ± 5 , 79 ± 6 ††82 ± 7 , 89 ± 4 ††66 ± 5 , 65 ± 5
CCX168 + CYC/RTX + Low-Dose SteroidsCCX168 + CYC/RTX + No SteroidsHigh Dose Steroids + CYC/RTX SOC
Demographics and baseline characteristics in Safety PopulationN = 22N = 22N = 23
Age, mean ± SD; Male %57 ± 14; 64%57 ± 14; 73%59 ± 14; 74%
Newly diagnosed/relapsing disease68%/32%73%/27%78%/22%
MPO+/PR3+/Both MPO+ and PR3+ ANCA (%)45%/36%/14%41%/36%/14%26%/48%/22%
BVAS, mean ± SD14.3 ± 6.013.8 ± 6.413.2 ± 5.8
Efficacy results (at 12 Weeks) in Intent-to-Treat PopulationN = 22N = 21N = 20
BVAS Response, n (%) 119 (86%) **17 (81%) *14 (70%)
BVAS Total, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-79 ± 14 %-73 ± 7 %-57 ± 14 %
BVAS Renal, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-77 ± 6 %-62 ± 9 %-53 ± 14 %
BVAS Non-Renal, % Change from baseline, mean ± SEM-87 ± 9 %-92 ± 5 % #-54 ± 19 %
BVAS Remission, n (%) 210 (46%)7 (33%)8 (40%)
BVAS Remission at Week 4 and 123 (14%)6 (29%)1 (5%)
U-ACR, mean % change 3,4-56% ##-44%-21%
eGFR, mean ± SEM 5 Baseline, Week 12 (mL/min/1.73 m2)52.5 ± 5.7 , 56.2 ± 4.354.8 ± 4.4 , 56.1 ± 5.247.2 ± 3.5 , 52.8 ± 3.6
U-RBC count, mean % change 4,6-83%-85%-92%
Urinary MCP-1/creatinine, mean % change 4,7-70% ##-49%-43%
EuroQOL-5D-5L VAS, mean ± SEM 8 Baseline, Week 1265 ± 5 , 75 ± 5 †69 ± 6 , 78 ± 469 ± 5 , 66 ± 5
SF-36 v2 Physical Functioning, mean ± SEM 9 Baseline, Week 1268 ± 8 , 84 ± 474 ± 11 , 93 ± 3 †67 ± 7 , 72 ± 4
SF-36 v2 Mental Health, mean ± SEM Baseline, Week 1262 ± 5 , 79 ± 6 ††82 ± 7 , 89 ± 4 ††66 ± 5 , 65 ± 5

1 Primary endpoint; BVAS response: ≥ 50% decrease from baseline and no worsening in any body system; 4 patients were excluded from the ITT population since they had no post baseline on-treatment BVAS measurements; 2 BVAS remission defined as BVAS of zero; 3 U-ACR = first morning urinary albumin:creatinine ratio; 4 percentage change based on ratio of geometric means, Week 12/Baseline; 5 estimated glomerular filtration rate from MDRD equation based on serum creatinine; 6 based on microscopic count of urinary RBC; 7 First morning urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein-1:creatinine ratio; 8 Euro Quality-of-Life 5-Domain 5-Level visual analogue scale; 9 Short Form-36 version 2 health survey; ** P = 0.002, * P = 0.01 for test of non-inferiority vs. control; ## P < 0.01, # P < 0.05 for superiority vs control; †† P < 0.01, † P < 0.05 for % change from baseline vs control.

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.