Abstract

Background. Numerous studies have assessed the accuracy of equations estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from serum creatinine in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in cross-sectional studies. Limited literature exists, however, on the consistency of performance of these equations in longitudinal studies as renal function declines.

Methods. Radionucleotide-measured GFR from 155 predialysis patients with stage 3–5 CKD was compared with eGFR derived from four equations [6-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (6-MDRD), 4-variable MDRD (4-MDRD), Cockcroft–Gault (CG) and Cockcroft–Gault equations corrected for body surface area (CGC)] at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Bias (difference between eGFR and measured GFR) was used as a measure of performance. Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) models were used to identify variables potentially affecting the performance of estimating equations across time.

Results. Mean measured GFR (±SD) at baseline, 12 and 24 months was 25.9 ± 10.7, 23.1 ± 10.6 and 20.3 ± 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively. There was a statistically significant negative association between bias and GFR for all four estimates (range: −0.76 to −0.71, P < 0.001 for all), indicating worsening underestimation and overestimation at higher and lower GFR, respectively. This negative association significantly reduced over the 24 months ( P < 0.001); however, this was largely due to persistent underestimation of eGFR from individuals with GFR >50 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . For those with a baseline GFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , the change in bias for any of the four equations over 24 months was ≤1.1 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , suggesting relatively preserved performance with time. The MDRD equations showed a sustained advantage in estimating renal function that was more evident as GFR declined.

Conclusion. GFR estimates are inexpensive and show an acceptable longitudinal performance for monitoring CKD patients with GFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Inaccuracies appear more substantial above this level of GFR, and care with interpretation is required.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.