-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Anne-Kathrin Schultz, Ming Zhang, Ingo Bulla, Thomas Leitner, Bette Korber, Burkhard Morgenstern, Mario Stanke, jpHMM: improving the reliability of recombination prediction in HIV-1, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 38, Issue 3, 1 January 2010, Page 1059, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq015
- Share Icon Share
Nucleic Acids Res. (2009) 37, W647–W651
The authors wish it to be known that, following publication, they have discovered an error in the evaluation program of the original Web Server tool described in their article. The new approach still performs better and therefore the qualitative results and discussion remain valid. Table 1 in their article should however be replaced with Table 1 shown below and the last five sentences of the ‘Results’ section should read as follows:
Comparison of the accuracy of breakpoint intervals (BPIs) predicted by jpHMM and the accuracy of BPI of fixed length
Threshold | BPI length | Percentage of BP found using | ||
tBPI | Average | Min/Max | Ppost | Fixed BPI length |
0.75 | 16.12 | 0/113 | 54.17 | 59.44 |
0.85 | 22.46 | 0/121 | 68.06 | 66.67 |
0.90 | 26.89 | 2/135 | 74.72 | 69.72 |
0.95 | 34.05 | 2/202 | 81.11 | 75.56 |
0.99 | 48.58 | 5/233 | 92.50 | 82.78 |
0.9999 | 84.77 | 11/492 | 98.06 | 92.50 |
Threshold | BPI length | Percentage of BP found using | ||
tBPI | Average | Min/Max | Ppost | Fixed BPI length |
0.75 | 16.12 | 0/113 | 54.17 | 59.44 |
0.85 | 22.46 | 0/121 | 68.06 | 66.67 |
0.90 | 26.89 | 2/135 | 74.72 | 69.72 |
0.95 | 34.05 | 2/202 | 81.11 | 75.56 |
0.99 | 48.58 | 5/233 | 92.50 | 82.78 |
0.9999 | 84.77 | 11/492 | 98.06 | 92.50 |
Results are shown for the first data set. In Column 1, the threshold tBPI is given. The average length of the BPI defined by tBPI is given in Column 2, the minimal and maximal length in Column 3. In Column 4, the percentage of real breakpoints detected with these BPIs is shown and in Column 5, the percentage of breakpoints using the average length of the predicted BPI as fixed BPI length (naïve method). For each threshold, the highest value is marked in bold face.
Comparison of the accuracy of breakpoint intervals (BPIs) predicted by jpHMM and the accuracy of BPI of fixed length
Threshold | BPI length | Percentage of BP found using | ||
tBPI | Average | Min/Max | Ppost | Fixed BPI length |
0.75 | 16.12 | 0/113 | 54.17 | 59.44 |
0.85 | 22.46 | 0/121 | 68.06 | 66.67 |
0.90 | 26.89 | 2/135 | 74.72 | 69.72 |
0.95 | 34.05 | 2/202 | 81.11 | 75.56 |
0.99 | 48.58 | 5/233 | 92.50 | 82.78 |
0.9999 | 84.77 | 11/492 | 98.06 | 92.50 |
Threshold | BPI length | Percentage of BP found using | ||
tBPI | Average | Min/Max | Ppost | Fixed BPI length |
0.75 | 16.12 | 0/113 | 54.17 | 59.44 |
0.85 | 22.46 | 0/121 | 68.06 | 66.67 |
0.90 | 26.89 | 2/135 | 74.72 | 69.72 |
0.95 | 34.05 | 2/202 | 81.11 | 75.56 |
0.99 | 48.58 | 5/233 | 92.50 | 82.78 |
0.9999 | 84.77 | 11/492 | 98.06 | 92.50 |
Results are shown for the first data set. In Column 1, the threshold tBPI is given. The average length of the BPI defined by tBPI is given in Column 2, the minimal and maximal length in Column 3. In Column 4, the percentage of real breakpoints detected with these BPIs is shown and in Column 5, the percentage of breakpoints using the average length of the predicted BPI as fixed BPI length (naïve method). For each threshold, the highest value is marked in bold face.
For example, for the default threshold, only 82.78% of all breakpoints could be detected with the naïve method, compared with 92.50%. So, the sensitivity of our method is up to 9.72 percentage points higher than that of the naïve method. For the other two data sets, the results are similar.
For the sequences containing segments of length 500 nt, for the default threshold, only 69.97% of all breakpoints could be detected using breakpoint intervals of fixed length, compared with 82.72% with our method. For segments of length 300 nt, this is 80.5% compared with 87.5%.
Comments