-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
James H. Diaz, Reply, Journal of Travel Medicine, Volume 15, Issue 5, 1 September 2008, Page 386, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8305.2008.00247_2.x
- Share Icon Share
Extract
Response to Letter:
I appreciate the comments of Drs Bern and Montgomery regarding my article on recognizing and reducing the risks of Chagas disease in travelers. 1 As its title indicated, this article addressed the recognition and prevention of Chagas diseases in travelers and not the currently recommended serodiagnostic and treatment strategies for Chagas disease. In addition, the article was submitted in 2006, underwent two revisions in 2007, and was published in 2008. Thus, the article was out of date in terms of latest diagnostics and treatments but not recognition and prevention strategies by publication time.
Regarding my references to the INCOSUR control initiative for Chagas disease in the Southern Cone of South America, this reference was added to the recommendations of outside reviewers in 2007 and not meant to slight the other ongoing disease control initiatives in Latin America outside of the Southern Cone nations in any way.
I agree that Triatoma sanguisuga with a distribution range throughout the southern United States and northern Mexico is not a vector of Chagas disease in the Yucatán peninsula of Mexico, where Triatoma dimidiata is the predominant vector. I discussed the ecology and vectorial transmission risks of Chagas disease to travelers to the Yucatán peninsula of Mexico in detail.