1-20 of 1025
Sort by
Journal Article
Reputation and Interdependence: How Japan Perceives US Resolve in Distant Regions
Get access
Georgios Zacharias
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf014, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf014
Published: 26 April 2025
Journal Article
Agency during Armed Conflict: Everyday Life under Competing Authorities in Myanmar’s Rakhine State
Florian Weigand and others
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf009, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf009
Published: 08 April 2025
Journal Article
“Hope the Russians Love Their Children Too”: Russian Public Support for the Use of Nuclear Weapons after the Invasion of Ukraine
Michal Smetana and Michal Onderco
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf012, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf012
Published: 07 April 2025
Image
Public support for a limited nuclear strike in conflicts with NATO and Ukra...
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 3.
Public support for a limited nuclear strike in conflicts with NATO and Ukraine. Notes: The left panel shows the predicted probabilities for agreeing with a nuclear strike based on the results of binomial logistic regression. The right panel shows the predicted probabilities for the given strike op
Image
The relative importance of public concerns regarding nuclear use. Notes...
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 5.
The relative importance of public concerns regarding nuclear use. Notes: A plot of means based on the results of multiple ANOVA models. The outcome measures are centered mean responses to survey items investigating the relative importance of given concerns with respect to nuclear use. Higher value
Image
Strike approval across conditions using a six-point ordinal scale. Note...
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 6.
Strike approval across conditions using a six-point ordinal scale. Notes: Regression estimates for agreement with nuclear weapon use across conditions. Variables that overlap with the vertical line are statistically indistinguishable from 0. N = 763 ( H 1 ), 814 ( H 2 ), 834 ( H 3 ). Error ba
Image
Public support for a limited nuclear strike in a conflict with NATO in 2021...
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 2.
Public support for a limited nuclear strike in a conflict with NATO in 2021 and 2024. Notes: The left panel displays predicted probabilities for agreeing with a nuclear strike based on the results of binomial logistic regression. The right panel shows predicted probabilities for the given strike o
Image
Public support for a demonstrative nuclear explosion and direct nuclear str...
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 4.
Public support for a demonstrative nuclear explosion and direct nuclear strike on a military target in Ukraine. Notes: The left panel shows the predicted probabilities for agreeing with nuclear use based on the results of binomial logistic regression. The right panel shows the predicted probabilit
Image
Research design. Notes: See online appendix 1 for the wording of...
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 1.
Research design. Notes: See online appendix 1 for the wording of individual survey items and the corresponding response options.
Image
Shifts in the concern about nuclear retaliation among supporters and oppone...
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 7.
Shifts in the concern about nuclear retaliation among supporters and opponents of the Russian leadership. Notes: Interaction between survey wave and leadership approval based on the results of the ANOVA test. N = 763. Error bars are 95 percent confidence intervals. Full results are provided in
Journal Article
Is There a Rebel Resource Curse? Ideological Appeals, Material Incentives, and the Success of Rebel Organizations
Get access
Michael J Soules
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf011, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf011
Published: 04 April 2025
Image
China’s sanctions - formal versus informal, 2000–2023
in
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is Not: China and Russia’s Implementation of Economic Sanctions
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 1.
China’s sanctions - formal versus informal, 2000–2023
Image
Russia’s sanctions by mechanism, 2000–2023
in
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is Not: China and Russia’s Implementation of Economic Sanctions
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 4.
Russia’s sanctions by mechanism, 2000–2023
Journal Article
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is Not: China and Russia’s Implementation of Economic Sanctions
Victor A Ferguson
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf010, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf010
Published: 04 April 2025
Image
China’s sanctions by mechanism, 2000–2023
in
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is Not: China and Russia’s Implementation of Economic Sanctions
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 2.
China’s sanctions by mechanism, 2000–2023
Image
Russia’s sanctions - formal versus informal, 2000–2023
in
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is Not: China and Russia’s Implementation of Economic Sanctions
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 3.
Russia’s sanctions - formal versus informal, 2000–2023
Image
Conversion disaggregated by underlying laws, China and Russia 2000–2023
in
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is Not: China and Russia’s Implementation of Economic Sanctions
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 6.
Conversion disaggregated by underlying laws, China and Russia 2000–2023
Image
China and Russia’s sanctions - formal versus informal, 2000–2023.
in
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is Not: China and Russia’s Implementation of Economic Sanctions
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 5.
China and Russia’s sanctions - formal versus informal, 2000–2023.
Image
Marginal effects of ideological recruitment on rebel capacity. (a) Marginal...
Get access
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 1.
Marginal effects of ideological recruitment on rebel capacity. (a) Marginal effects of ideological recruitment on arms procurement. (b) Marginal effects of ideological recruitment on fighting capacity. (c) Marginal effects of ideological recruitment on mobilization capacity.
Journal Article
The Bureaucratic Politics of Cyber Strategy
Nadiya Kostyuk and others
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf007, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf007
Published: 03 April 2025
Advertisement
Advertisement