1-20 of 1025
Sort by
Journal Article
Georgios Zacharias
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf014, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf014
Published: 26 April 2025
Journal Article
Florian Weigand and others
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf009, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf009
Published: 08 April 2025
Journal Article
Michal Smetana and Michal Onderco
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf012, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf012
Published: 07 April 2025
Image
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 3. Public support for a limited nuclear strike in conflicts with NATO and Ukraine. Notes: The left panel shows the predicted probabilities for agreeing with a nuclear strike based on the results of binomial logistic regression. The right panel shows the predicted probabilities for the given strike op
Image
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 5. The relative importance of public concerns regarding nuclear use. Notes: A plot of means based on the results of multiple ANOVA models. The outcome measures are centered mean responses to survey items investigating the relative importance of given concerns with respect to nuclear use. Higher value
Image
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 6. Strike approval across conditions using a six-point ordinal scale. Notes: Regression estimates for agreement with nuclear weapon use across conditions. Variables that overlap with the vertical line are statistically indistinguishable from 0. N =  763 ( H 1 ), 814 ( H 2 ), 834 ( H 3 ). Error ba
Image
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 2. Public support for a limited nuclear strike in a conflict with NATO in 2021 and 2024. Notes: The left panel displays predicted probabilities for agreeing with a nuclear strike based on the results of binomial logistic regression. The right panel shows predicted probabilities for the given strike o
Image
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 4. Public support for a demonstrative nuclear explosion and direct nuclear strike on a military target in Ukraine. Notes: The left panel shows the predicted probabilities for agreeing with nuclear use based on the results of binomial logistic regression. The right panel shows the predicted probabilit
Image
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 1. Research design. Notes: See online appendix 1 for the wording of individual survey items and the corresponding response options.
Image
Published: 07 April 2025
Figure 7. Shifts in the concern about nuclear retaliation among supporters and opponents of the Russian leadership. Notes: Interaction between survey wave and leadership approval based on the results of the ANOVA test. N =  763. Error bars are 95 percent confidence intervals. Full results are provided in
Journal Article
Michael J Soules
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf011, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf011
Published: 04 April 2025
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 1. China’s sanctions - formal versus informal, 2000–2023
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 4. Russia’s sanctions by mechanism, 2000–2023
Journal Article
Victor A Ferguson
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf010, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf010
Published: 04 April 2025
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 2. China’s sanctions by mechanism, 2000–2023
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 3. Russia’s sanctions - formal versus informal, 2000–2023
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 6. Conversion disaggregated by underlying laws, China and Russia 2000–2023
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 5. China and Russia’s sanctions - formal versus informal, 2000–2023.
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Figure 1. Marginal effects of ideological recruitment on rebel capacity. (a) Marginal effects of ideological recruitment on arms procurement. (b) Marginal effects of ideological recruitment on fighting capacity. (c) Marginal effects of ideological recruitment on mobilization capacity.
Journal Article
Nadiya Kostyuk and others
Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, September 2025, ogaf007, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaf007
Published: 03 April 2025