Abstract

Due to the potential toxicity of mercury, there is an immediate need to understand its uptake, transport and flux within living cells. Conventional techniques used to analyze Hg2+ are invasive, involve high cost and are less sensitive. In the present study, a highly efficient genetically encoded mercury FRET sensor (MerFS) was developed to measure the cellular dynamics of Hg2+ at trace level in real time. To construct MerFS, the periplasmic mercury-binding protein MerP was sandwiched between enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP) and venus. MerFS is pH stable, offers a measurable fluorescent signal and binds to Hg2+ with high sensitivity and selectivity. Mutant MerFS-51 binds with an apparent affinity (K  d) of 5.09 × 10−7 M, thus providing a detection range for Hg2+ quantification between 0.210 µM and 1.196 µM. Furthermore, MerFS-51 was targeted to Escherichia coli (E. coli), yeast and human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293T cells that allowed dynamic measurement of intracellular Hg2+ concentration with a highly responsive saturation curve, proving its potential application in cellular systems.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10295-019-02235-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction

Metal ions are essentially needed by a certain set of biological organisms for crucial cellular processes and metabolic functions necessary to support life. Metals either act as cofactors for the catalytic activity of an enzyme or constitute an integral part of the structural component of a protein. Several efficient mechanisms such as metal acquisition by metalloproteins, influx/efflux ion pumps, and metal ion transporters/carriers are adapted by both prokaryotes and eukaryotes to maintain an appropriate balance of metal ions within the cell [1]. In contrast to important metal and transition metal ions, toxic metals present in even trace amounts can cause detrimental effects on human health and the environment. Toxic metals may include heavy metal ions (Hg2+, Pb2+, Fe2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Zn2+) as well as semi-metallic elements or metalloids (As3+, Se2+) [2]. Heavy metals are ubiquitous, non-biodegradable, tend to bioaccumulate and are extremely harmful [3]. Most of the heavy metals are carcinogens that bind to DNA and proteins and alter the genetic makeup of a cell, resulting in extreme health complications that are not only toxic but also life-threatening [4]. In small quantities, heavy metals form complexes, especially with biological matters containing nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen in their active sites [5]. These interactions can cause structural changes in a protein at the molecular level and inhibit enzymes required for certain metabolic reactions. The toxicological profile of affected individuals highlights the carcinogenic effects of heavy metals on the central nervous system, kidneys, liver, skin, bones and teeth and can lead to acute toxicity, neurobehavioural retardation, multidrug resistance and even death [57]. As one of the heavy metals, mercury is a highly reactive and extremely volatile environmental pollutant that can be readily absorbed into the lungs/by intestinal tissues via skin exposure and may cause indigestion [8]. Mercury levels in ambient air are reported to be in the range of 2–10 ng/m3 [9]. The recommended mercury level in drinking water is 6000 ng/L as per the guidelines set by the World Health Organization [10]. The mean mercury concentration in whole blood is usually below 10 μg/L, but the value up to 20 μg/L is considered normal, whereas urine mercury concentration exceeding 100 μg/L can result in nervous disorders, and the level of 800 μg/L or above is fatal [11]. The most toxic methylmercury (MeHg) has a strong affinity for the thiol groups of proteins [12] and is a major concern to human life and ecosystem [13], as it affects the central and peripheral nervous systems causing severe neurobehavioral disorders. Methylmercury is a hydrophobic that crosses the blood–brain barrier and gets accumulated in the brain [13, 14]. Inorganic mercuric salts are reported to be corrosive to the skin, eyes and gastrointestinal tract. Mercury and its compounds have a strong affinity for sulfur and thiol group-containing molecules such as glutathione (GH), glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, cysteine, metallothionein (MT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) [1517]. Mercuric compounds are also responsible for the inhibition of enzymes such as succinate dehydrogenase and cytochrome c oxidase involved in the citric acid cycle. Enzyme inhibition by this heavy metal leads to several neurological and behavioral disorders along with other nephrotoxic symptoms [18]. Hg2+ exposure generates free radicals like reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the body, thus inducing oxidative stress by affecting K+ and Ca2+ concentrations in mitochondria. Such decreased Ca2+ levels alter the neurotransmitter release, thereby increasing concentrations of dopamine and acetylcholine. Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels also increase because of lipid peroxidation on high-level Hg2+ exposure [19]. Furthermore, inhalation, ingestion and dermal exposure of mercuric salts induce symptoms like tremors, insomnia, memory loss, neuromuscular effects, headaches and cognitive and motor dysfunction.

In past, different spectroscopic approaches such as inductively coupled plasma atomic electron spectrometry (ICP/AES), atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS), mass spectrometry (MS), electrochemical (ion electrodes), chromatographic, voltammetric and optical methods were employed to monitor and detect mercury ions in environmental and biological samples [2023]. Gas chromatography [24], colorimetric probes [25, 26], X-ray fluorescence and nuclear microscopy were other methods that were considered while selecting analytical tools for measuring mercury levels [27]. However, all these traditional techniques are expensive, bio-incompatible, toxic, complicated, time consuming, show low selectivity and less sensitivity and require degradation/disruption of biological samples along with highly trained personnel [6]. Therefore, the development of new and inexpensive methods for the detection of bioavailable Hg2+ concentrations is highly desirable when it comes to in situ analysis and low-level pollutant detection. Biosensors are promising, fast emerging and cost-effective tools to detect such heavy metals. Fluorescence backed biosensor technology has gained tremendous popularity in recent times. Construction of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based nanosensors for heavy metal detection is the latest approach in current times that has worked to quantify trace concentration of heavy metals, localize and monitor the distribution of metal ions within the cellular and subcellular compartments of the cell in real time.

An extensive range of FRET approaches has been designed for the detection of Hg2+ in cellular systems. One of them discusses the development of a fluorescent ratiometric chemosensor dyad (L) bearing organic dyes like rhodamine B and naphthalimide as FRET pair [28], while the other uses N-acetyl-l-cysteine functionalized quantum dots (NAC-QDs) and Rhodamine 6G derivative-mercury conjugate (R6G-D-Hg) as donor and acceptor molecules [29] for detection of Hg2+ in aqueous solution. In another approach, polymeric nanoparticles were used as the scaffold where nitrobenzoxadiazolyl derivative (NBD) dye (the donor) was embedded in the nanoparticles and rhodamine derivative SRhB-NH2 was covalently linked to the particle surface and used as the recognition element for Hg2+ [30]. However, each method of Hg2+ detection comes with its own drawbacks. Organic dyes are prone to metabolic degradation, have limited photostability and show reduced quantum yield at near-infrared wavelengths. Their use in biological studies results in bleed-through or spectral crosstalk in the dual emission detectors. Owing to their relatively narrow absorption/emission bands and small Stokes shifts, organic dyes like rhodamine and fluorescein experience ‘red tail’ emission spectra that consequently lead to signal leakage [31]. Quantum dots (QDs), on the other hand, are nanocolloids that are cytotoxic and their broad absorption spectra further limit their use as FRET acceptors in fluorescence quantification studies. Moreover, QD-protein fusion sensors, because of their potentially large size and random switching between emitting and non-emitting states render them less efficient and are difficult to induce in living cells [3133]. The recently developed microbial and cell-free luminescence/fluorescence-based biosensor uses MerR protein as the recognition element for Hg2+ and luciferase (LucFF) and emerald green fluorescent protein (EmGFP) genes separately as reporters [34]. Firefly luciferase can help study single molecular events and has a large size that limits its ability to be used as a recombinant protein as it leads to stearic hinderance [35]. In single FP-based sensors, binding of metal induces a change in the chemical environment of the cell, causing an intensity change or a shift in the fluorescence spectrum, whereas in sensors containing two FPs, metal binding induces a conformational change in the binding domain and consequently give rise to a FRET signal [36].

Here we are reporting a genetically encoded FRET-based nanosensor for Hg2+ ions that makes use of a mercury-binding MerP protein and two green fluorescent protein (GFP) variants ECFP and venus (a red-shifted yellow fluorescent protein) to monitor the dynamic flux of Hg2+ ions in a concentration-dependent manner both in vitro and in cellular systems. This sensor is genetically encoded and potentially non-invasive that establishes its efficacy and can be used for the detection of Hg2+ in cellular systems. MerP, a component of the bacterial mercury detoxification system, is a 72-residue protein that binds mercury in the periplasm and transfers it to the transport proteins MerT or MerF releasing the metal into the cytoplasm where the enzyme mercuric reductase reduces Hg2+ to Hg0 [37, 38]. Conformational changes induced in MerP protein upon the addition of Hg2+ ions bring the donor ECFP at N-terminus and the acceptor venus at C-terminus of merP gene in close vicinity, transforming this change into a ratiometric FRET signal. This genetically encoded FRET-based nanosensor would allow real-time and in situ detection of Hg2+ ions which would help to tightly regulate their intracellular concentration in different cellular environments.

Materials and methods

Designing and construction of the nanosensor

The sequence and crystal structure of MerP protein were retrieved from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, managed by NPO Bioinformatics Japan and RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB), respectively. Mercury sensing merP gene was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa after removing 20 signal peptides from the 5ʹ end and one STOP codon from the 3ʹ end of the gene using a forward primer (5ʹ-CGGggtaccACCCAGACCGTCACGCTAGCGG-3ʹ) and a reverse primer (5ʹ-CGGggtaccCTTGACGCTGGACGGATAGCCG-3ʹ). The lowercase sequence shows the restriction site KpnI. The fluorescent proteins (FPs) ECFP and venus are mutated variants of GFP extracted from a cnidarian, Aequorea victoria. The intrinsic fluorescence properties exhibited by these two FPs were exploited to construct the genetically encoded FRET-based nanosensor. The sensor was generated by sequentially ligating the genes encoding ECFP, merP and venus in pRSET-B (Invitrogen, USA) bacterial expression vector that adds an in-frame His tag at the amino terminus of the sequence and transformed in E. coli DH5α to generate a chimeric mercury FRET sensor. Gateway technology, following manufacturers’ instruction, was used for the shuttling of MerFS-51 in pYES-DEST52 (Invitrogen, USA). Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae/URA3) strain BY4742 was maintained on YEPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone and 2% glucose) agar, grown in liquid YEPD medium with aeration on a shaker at 30 °C and transformed with MerFS-51. The chimeric sequence was then excised from the bacterial expression vector and sub-cloned in pcDNA3.1(-) (Invitrogen, USA) at BamHI and HindIII sites, respectively, for expression in HEK-293T cells.

Expression and purification of the nanosensor protein

Heat shock method was employed to transform the chimeric pRSET-B-ECFP-merP-venus plasmid in E. coli BL21-codon plus. The expression of the nanosensor was carried out by inoculating a single transformed colony in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 37 °C till the OD600 reaches 0.6. The cells were then induced by β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 1 mM and grown at 20 °C for 16 h in a dark environment. The expressed cells were harvested at 6500 × g for 30 min and resuspended in a lysis buffer containing Tris–Cl pH 8.0, sodium chloride, imidazole, glycerol, a detergent (Triton-X) and a protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Sonication was done to lyse the bacterial cells and the extracted sensor protein was collected by centrifugation at 6500 x g for 30 min. Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni–NTA) His-tag affinity chromatography was used for purification of the sensor protein. Ni–NTA resin was washed with a wash buffer (20 mM Tris–Cl and 10 mM imidazole) to equilibrate the beads at pH 7.8. Binding of the protein was done at 4 °C for 1 h, which was followed by washing of the column with three consecutive buffers (Buffer A: 30 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 5% glycerol; Buffer B: 30 mM Tris–Cl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 5% glycerol; Buffer C: 20 mM Tris–Cl pH 8.0). The protein was then eluted with a buffer (30 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 300 mM imidazole, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 5% glycerol) and kept at 4 °C overnight to allow proper folding of the protein to its native conformation. The purity of the protein was checked by running a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The purified sensor protein was named as the mercury FRET sensor (MerFS).

Stability evaluation and fluorescence emission spectrum of sensor protein

The purified MerFS protein was diluted to a concentration of 0.15 mg/ml several times to carry out the characterization of the protein in various buffer systems ranging from pH 5.0 to 8.0. The buffers used were PBS (phosphate-buffered saline), TBS (Tris-buffered saline), Tris Cl and MOPS (3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonicacid). Further stability of the protein was confirmed in 20 mM PBS buffer in the absence and presence of 0.5 µM Hg2+ ions. Fluorescence emission spectra of ECFP and venus were recorded using a monochromator microplate reader (Biotek, USA) through excitation of ECFP at 420 nm and fluorescence intensity was recorded in the range of 460–600 nm.

Mutagenesis and ligand-binding isotherm of the MerFS proteins

PDB was searched for retrieving the structure of MerP protein (PDB id: 1AVJ) and the amino acids involved in the binding pocket were identified. The binding motif GMTCSAC of MerP protein is responsible for the binding of the Hg2+ ions. It has been previously established that a change in position of the two cysteines residues in the metal-binding sequence GMTCXXC, i.e., CAAC, CACA, and CCAA affects the binding capacity and specificity of MerP for mercury ions [39]. Therefore, a set of affinity mutants S34A (GMTCAAC, serine replaced by alanine at position 34), S34C (GMTCCAC, serine replaced by cysteine at position 34), S34C-C36A (GMTCCAA, serine replaced by cysteine at position 34 and cysteine replaced by alanine at position 36) and C33G-C34G (GMTGGAA, cysteine replaced by glycine at both position 33 and 34) of MerFS were created by introducing point mutations in the merP gene. For this purpose, a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit was used. These mutations were carried out to check the role of cysteine residues in binding of Hg2+. A double mutant C33G-C34G was developed in which both the cysteine residues present in the binding motif were mutated to glycine. Since MerP has been shown to bind Hg2+ through these two cysteine residues, this variant would serve as a control to study the binding event in cellular experiments. This variant was given the name MerFS-control. Mutations were also performed to alter the physiological range of the sensor proteins. The mutant sensor proteins were then expressed and purified as stated above.

For checking the affinity of MerFS proteins towards the different metal ions, a fluorescent signal in the form of FRET ratio was recorded in a microtitre plate with 96-well till no more change in the FRET ratio was observed to obtain a ligand titration saturation plot. The excitation filter used was 420/20 nm and the emission filter set for ECFP and venus was adjusted to 485/20 nm and 540/20 nm, respectively, for recording the FRET signal. Further binding constants (K  d) of the WT and sensor variants were calculated using GraphPad Prism software by fitting the ligand titration curve in a binding isotherm equation [40, 41]: S = (r − r  apo)/(r  sat − r  apo) = [L]/(K  d + [L]), where S is saturation; [L] is ligand concentration; r is the relative ratio change of the emission intensities of the two fluorophores with respect to the increasing concentration of the ligand; r  apo is ratio in the absence of ligand and r  sat is ratio at saturation with ligand.

Metal specificity of the wild-type and affinity sensors

To evaluate the specificity and selectivity of the WT sensor and its variants, the purified sensor proteins were diluted in 20 mM PBS buffer and incubated with various metal ions at physiological concentrations. The tested metal salts included HgCl2 (1 µM), CH3ClHg (3 µM), CdCl2 (10 nM), CuCl2 (100 nM), ZnCl2 (10 µM), AsCl3 (1 µM), NaCl (2 mM), KCl (150 mM), CaCl2 (10 µM), MgCl2 (10 mM) and FeCl2 (100 µM). The change in the FRET ratio was recorded to determine the metal specificity of the sensor proteins. All readings were taken in triplicates in a monochromator microplate reader with a 96-well plate.

Measurement of intracellular Hg2+ in bacteria

Uptake of Hg2+ in E. coli was monitored in a time-dependent manner. MerFS-51 was expressed in E. coli BL21-codon plus strain by inducing the cells in their log phase with 1 mM IPTG at 20 °C in dark. The expressed cells were separated from the media and resuspended in 20 mM PBS buffer (pH 7.0). Bacterial cell suspension along with Hg2+ ions was dispensed in microplate wells in triplicates. FRET ratio was recorded at regular intervals of 5 min for a period of 2 h. Simultaneously, a control experiment was designed using MerFS-control and the ratiometric change was monitored for the defined period in the presence of 0.5 µM Hg2+. The excitation filter used was 420/20 nm and the emission filter set for ECFP and venus was adjusted to 485/20 nm and 540/20 nm, respectively, for recording the dual emission intensities in the form of FRET signal. Confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a confocal head TCS-SPE and 63x objective piece with 1.53 N. A. and a coupled camera was used for checking the expression and to take images of MerFS-51 after fixing the expressed bacterial cells by an adhesive on a glass slide.

Live cell monitoring of Hg2+ uptake by MerFS-51 in eukaryotic cells

Yeast and HEK-293T were used as eukaryotic model systems for the cell-based study of MerFS-51. MerFS-51 was introduced in BY4742 strain for monitoring the uptake, localization and distribution pattern of MerFS-51 in yeast cells. Selection of the cells transformed with MerFS-51 was done using synthetic-defined (SD) agar plates and the cells were grown for expression in YEPD media for 3–5 days with 3% galactose and 2% sucrose. Since the destination vector pYES-DEST52 contains Gal1 promoter, galactose works as an inducer and sucrose is added to maintain the nutrients in the growth media. To establish a negative control, the construct MerFS-control was cloned in yeast expression vector pYEST-DEST52. The yeast cells were fixed on a glass slide and FRET ratio (540/485 nm) along with ratiometric imaging after the addition of 0.5 µM mercury was performed using a 63x oil immersion objective of the confocal microscope (Leica, Germany) for 10 min.

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM, Sigma, USA) enriched with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco-life technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and 1% antibiotic cocktail was used to maintain the HEK-293T cell line. HEK-293T cells were cultured in sterile polylysine-coated coverslips embedded in 6-well cell culture plate in a humidified incubator (5% CO2) at 37 °C and were serum starved for 3–5 h before transfecting cells with MerFS-51 with the help of a transfection reagent lipofectamine. The cells were grown for 48 h after transfection and healthy growth conditions were maintained by replacing the medium of cells with fresh complete media as and when required. For imaging purposes, the cells were washed with 20 mM PBS buffer (pH 7.0) and emission ratio change was recorded on a confocal microscope. Dual emission fluorescent intensities were measured after the addition of 0.5 µM mercury that uses an excitation filter of 420 nm. Ratiometric emission intensities were recorded for 10 min and images of the expressed MerFS-51 were acquired. As a negative control, C33G-C34G mutant was cloned in mammalian cell expression vector pcDNA3.1 (−) and changes in the ratio were recorded for 10 min after the addition of 0.5 µM Hg2+.

Cell culture and cytotoxicity studies

Culture of HEK-293T cells was maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic cocktail (penicillin, streptomycin and amphotericin-B) in a humidified CO2 chamber (5% CO2, 37 °C). The cytotoxicity evaluation of mercury was carried out using standard MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5- bromide) assay [4244]. Briefly, the cells (9000-10,000 cells/well) were plated in a 96-well cell culture plate. After 24 h growth, the cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of mercury Hg2+ (0–5 μM) for 24 h. The culture medium was aspirated and cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4). After washing, cells were incubated for 4–5 h with 100 µl of incomplete medium and 25 µl of MTT solution (taken from 5 mg/ml stock), at 37 °C in the CO2 incubator. Subsequently, the supernatant of cells was removed and the remaining formazan crystals were dissolved by adding 150–200 µl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The absorbance of the resultant solution was taken at 570 nm using a multiplate ELISA reader (BioRad). Finally, the percentage cell viabilities were calculated and plotted as a function of Hg2+ concentration.

Results and discussion

Construction of a nanosensor

A genetically encoded FRET-based nanosensor for monitoring, detecting and measuring Hg2+ ions both under in vitro conditions and in cellular systems at the real time was successfully achieved through traditional cloning techniques. A cassette was prepared in pRSET-B bacterial expression vector with ECFP and venus at N- and C-terminus of the merP, respectively. A schematic representation of the constructed nanosensor in different expression vectors is shown in Fig. 1a-b. Periplasmic-binding proteins (PBPs) bind a specific substrate (e.g., sugar, amino acid, secondary metabolite) with high affinity and undergo large “Venus flytrap” conformational changes upon ligand binding [4548]. Due to its remarkable affinity for Hg2+, MerP was used as a ligand sensing domain for developing MerFS and was sandwiched between ECFP, a donor fluorophore and venus, an acceptor fluorophore. The fidelity of the sensor construct was confirmed by sequence analysis (Fig. S1). MerFS construct maps in different expression vectors are shown in Fig. S2.
Construction of a nanosensor. a Crystal structure of periplasmic mercury-binding (MerP) protein showing Hg2+ as a dot structure. b Linear representation of MerFS constructs in different vectors for expression in prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems
Fig. 1

Construction of a nanosensor. a Crystal structure of periplasmic mercury-binding (MerP) protein showing Hg2+ as a dot structure. b Linear representation of MerFS constructs in different vectors for expression in prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems

Mercury is highly hazardous and poses severe toxic and deleterious effects on the environment resulting in serious substantial health problems [6, 49, 50]. Therefore, understanding the uptake and distribution of Hg2+ non-invasively becomes a crucial aspect for the diagnosis and identification of this metal-induced diseases and disorders for pathophysiological and clinical purposes. Thus, this genetically encoded FRET-based sensor would help to understand Hg2+ homeostasis in a non-destructible and non-invasive manner. The sensor construct MerFS-51 was also transferred to pYES-DEST52 a destination vector via an entry pENTR4 vector through Gateway technology for expression of the sensor protein in yeast BY4742 and to pcDNA3.1(-) vector for expression in HEK-293T cells.

Expression and purification of the nanosensor protein

Expression of the sensor protein in E. coli BL21-codon plus cells was obtained by inducing with 1 mM IPTG once the OD600 reached 0.6 and the cells were further grown in dark for 16 h at 20 °C. The cells were then lysed to release the sensor protein that carries an N-terminal His6 tag for purification through affinity chromatography from E. coli cells. The nanosensor protein was successfully purified and fidelity and size were confirmed by running a 10% SDS-PAGE.

Fluorescence emission spectrum of MerFS

The spectral scan was recorded in the wavelength range 460–600 nm with mercury at varying concentrations. The emission profile of nanosensor protein showed a respective decrease and increase in emission intensities of the two fluorophores ECFP and venus, respectively, upon the addition of Hg2+ ions (Fig. 2). Metal-binding sequences (MBSs) are relatively small, highly homologous polypeptides containing the sequence MTCXXC (where X is any amino acid) and are used to transport heavy metals to target proteins [8]. The metal-induced conformation changes occur mostly near the binding sequence GMTCXXC [12]. Coordination to the cysteine residues is the dominant mechanism for metal–protein interactions in these proteins [41]. MerP protein has a βαββαβ fold with two α-helices superimposed on a four-stranded antiparallel β-sheet [7, 47] which bind to the sulfur atoms of two Cysteine (Cys14 and Cys17) side chains with linear bicoordinate geometry as determined by NMR [39, 47, 51]. The emission scan profile indicated that on increasing the concentration of Hg2+ ions, the emission intensity of ECFP decreased in response to the conformational changes induced in the MerP protein bringing the two fluorophores close to each other. On the other hand, the emission intensity of venus increased due to a non-radiative energy transfer from ECFP to venus. Hg2+-induced conformational changes in MerP are therefore recorded as a ratiometric FRET signal. This FRET efficiency (E) or the rate of energy transfer depends on the spectral overlap between the donor’s emission and acceptor’s absorption, the distance between the two fluorophores and the relative orientation of the two dipoles [52, 53].
The fluorescence emission spectrum of the MerFS protein. The spectrum was recorded in a fluorimeter by exciting the sensor protein at 420 nm. An increase in the FRET ratio is observed upon mercury binding as the emission intensity of ECFP decreases with a concomitant increase in the emission intensity of venus
Fig. 2

The fluorescence emission spectrum of the MerFS protein. The spectrum was recorded in a fluorimeter by exciting the sensor protein at 420 nm. An increase in the FRET ratio is observed upon mercury binding as the emission intensity of ECFP decreases with a concomitant increase in the emission intensity of venus

pH stability of MerFS protein

To study the pH stability of the nanosensor protein venus/ECFP emission, intensity change was recorded with different buffer systems in the pH range 5.0–8.0. The buffers chosen for the study were PBS, TBS, Tris Cl and MOPS. MerFS was found to be most stable in 20 mM PBS buffer with the least changes in the FRET ratio (Fig. 3a). A significant increase in emission intensity ratio change was observed up to pH 7.0 indicating the sensor’s sensitiveness in acidic environments. However, at alkaline pH (7.0–8.0), MerFS was found to be comparatively stable with slight changes in the dual emission intensity ratio (Fig. 3b). Further stability in the alkaline environment was confirmed in the absence and after the addition of 0.5 µM Hg2+ while measuring the 540/485 nm emission ratio in PBS buffer with altered pH. Therefore, 20 mM PBS buffer with pH 7.0 was used to carry out further experiments with the sensor protein. This sensor can monitor the toxic levels of Hg2+ ions at low concentrations under in vitro conditions and in cellular systems non-invasively. The cytosolic pH range of S. cerevisiae is also considered to be around 7.2 which makes MerFS suitable to study mercury uptake in yeast cells [54]. Environmental factors affect the properties of the fluorescent proteins, thus, to avoid a problem with the specificity it is important to analyze the stability of the sensor protein [55].
Stability of MerFS protein. a The stability was measured by calculating the 540/485 nm ratio in various buffer systems (MOPS, PBS, TBS and Tris–Cl) in the pH range 5.0–8.0. b pH stability of MerFS in PBS buffer. FRET ratio was measured in PBS buffer with different pH, in the absence and presence of 0.5 µM mercury. Stability increases with pH and the sensor stabilize above pH 7.0. Data are means of three independent replicates (n = 3). Vertical bars indicate standard error
Fig. 3

Stability of MerFS protein. a The stability was measured by calculating the 540/485 nm ratio in various buffer systems (MOPS, PBS, TBS and Tris–Cl) in the pH range 5.0–8.0. b pH stability of MerFS in PBS buffer. FRET ratio was measured in PBS buffer with different pH, in the absence and presence of 0.5 µM mercury. Stability increases with pH and the sensor stabilize above pH 7.0. Data are means of three independent replicates (n = 3). Vertical bars indicate standard error

Affinity mutants and binding isotherms

A total of four affinity sensors were generated by introducing point mutations in the binding pocket GMTCSAC of MerP protein to increase its physiological detection range. For this purpose, through the process of site-directed mutagenesis, point mutations were carried out in amino acid residues involved in the binding of Hg2+ ions. The WT and mutant sensors were then purified, and the ligand saturation curves were plotted to calculate the binding affinity (K  d) of the sensor proteins. The WT and mutants covered the range of 0.210–1.196 µM Hg2+ measurement. The wild-type MerFS showed a maximal ratio change of 0.859, with a sharp increase from 0.320 to 1.179 in the concentration range of 0.2–1 µM. It then stabilizes indicating saturation of MerFS with Hg2+ ions with no further significant change in 540/485 nm emission ratio (Fig. 4). The saturation curve indicates a fully occupied ligand-binding pocket of MerP in MerFS with Hg2+. The calculated K  d of WT (MerFS-89), S34A (MerFS-73), S34C (MerFS-51) and S34C-C36A (MerFS-82) was 8.90 × 10−7 M, 7.34 × 10−7 M, 5.09 × 10−7 M and 8.16 × 10−7 M, respectively. The dynamic range of Hg2+ detection by WT and mutants was also calculated (Table 1). However, the mutant C33G-C34G in which both cysteine residues are replaced by glycine shows no binding and was used as the control. This is consistent with the previously established study that the elimination of cysteine residues from the binding motif blocks the uptake of Hg2+ and abolishes the binding of MerP to Hg2+. Based on the binding constant (K  d) values, MerFS-51 was found to be the most efficient nanosensor and therefore was used for further analyzing the dynamic flux rate of Hg2+ in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cellular systems. MerP binds Hg2+ via the two soft thiolato ligands from the two deprotonated cysteines. The metal-induced conformation changes occur mostly near the binding sequence GMTCSAC and a small change in the position of these residues influences dramatically the binding affinity of MerP to Hg2+ ions [49]. Therefore, affinity mutants of MerFS were generated to augment the physiological range of Hg2+ detection. MerFS-51 was found the most efficient as its binding with Hg2+ was highest as indicated by the K  d value and can measure the level of mercury at different physiological scales. Mutations of these amino acid residues were carried out to study their role in the Hg2+ ion-sensing properties of MerFS.
Ligand-binding isotherms of the WT and affinity sensors. In vitro ligand-dependent FRET ratio change was recorded in the presence of mercury. Affinity mutants S34A, S34C, S34C-C36A and C33G-C34G compared with WT nanosensor
Fig. 4

Ligand-binding isotherms of the WT and affinity sensors. In vitro ligand-dependent FRET ratio change was recorded in the presence of mercury. Affinity mutants S34A, S34C, S34C-C36A and C33G-C34G compared with WT nanosensor

 

Binding constants and dynamic range of MerFS-WT and mutants

Sensor nameaSequencesBinding motifK  d (M) (± SD*)Dynamic rangeb (µM)
MerFS-89Wild typeGMTCSAC8.90 × 10−7 (± 0.01)0.210–1.196
MerFS-73S34AGMTCAAC7.34 × 10−7 (± 0.02)0.362–1.061
MerFS-51S34CGMTCCAC5.09 × 10−7 (± 0.02)0.234–1.028
MerFS-82 MerFS-controlS34C-C36A C33G-C34GcGMTCCAA GMTGGAA8.16 × 10−7 (± 0.03) No binding0.289–1.139 -
Sensor nameaSequencesBinding motifK  d (M) (± SD*)Dynamic rangeb (µM)
MerFS-89Wild typeGMTCSAC8.90 × 10−7 (± 0.01)0.210–1.196
MerFS-73S34AGMTCAAC7.34 × 10−7 (± 0.02)0.362–1.061
MerFS-51S34CGMTCCAC5.09 × 10−7 (± 0.02)0.234–1.028
MerFS-82 MerFS-controlS34C-C36A C33G-C34GcGMTCCAA GMTGGAA8.16 × 10−7 (± 0.03) No binding0.289–1.139 -

Binding constants (K  d) was determined in vitro

*Standard deviation (SD)

aNumber next to the mutant name stands for the K  d of the sensor variants

bEffective quantification range between 10% and 90% saturation of the nanosensor

cMerFS-control (C33G-C34G) was created using mutant S34C-C36A as a template

Binding constants and dynamic range of MerFS-WT and mutants

Sensor nameaSequencesBinding motifK  d (M) (± SD*)Dynamic rangeb (µM)
MerFS-89Wild typeGMTCSAC8.90 × 10−7 (± 0.01)0.210–1.196
MerFS-73S34AGMTCAAC7.34 × 10−7 (± 0.02)0.362–1.061
MerFS-51S34CGMTCCAC5.09 × 10−7 (± 0.02)0.234–1.028
MerFS-82 MerFS-controlS34C-C36A C33G-C34GcGMTCCAA GMTGGAA8.16 × 10−7 (± 0.03) No binding0.289–1.139 -
Sensor nameaSequencesBinding motifK  d (M) (± SD*)Dynamic rangeb (µM)
MerFS-89Wild typeGMTCSAC8.90 × 10−7 (± 0.01)0.210–1.196
MerFS-73S34AGMTCAAC7.34 × 10−7 (± 0.02)0.362–1.061
MerFS-51S34CGMTCCAC5.09 × 10−7 (± 0.02)0.234–1.028
MerFS-82 MerFS-controlS34C-C36A C33G-C34GcGMTCCAA GMTGGAA8.16 × 10−7 (± 0.03) No binding0.289–1.139 -

Binding constants (K  d) was determined in vitro

*Standard deviation (SD)

aNumber next to the mutant name stands for the K  d of the sensor variants

bEffective quantification range between 10% and 90% saturation of the nanosensor

cMerFS-control (C33G-C34G) was created using mutant S34C-C36A as a template

In vitro characterization and metal specificity of the nanosensors

To check the specificity of the nanosensor proteins towards different metal ions, the FRET ratio was recorded by dispersing 180 µl of diluted sensor proteins and 20 µl of metal ion ligand in each well of a 96-well microplate. Each of the affinity mutants along with the WT sensor was treated separately with the relevant metal ions. The sensors showed maximum specificity for Hg2+ as the maximum change in the FRET ratio was recorded on adding Hg2+. The purified proteins also detected other metals like MeHg+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, As3+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Fe2+ but to a limited degree indicating the effectiveness of the sensors for Hg2+ (Fig. 5). Clearly, the WT and the sensor variants exhibit high affinity for Hg2+ as compared to other metal ions that showed only a small variation in the emission intensity ratio. The high specificity of MerFS towards Hg2+ ions clearly indicates that conformational changes induced in the MerP protein [56] bring the donor and acceptor fluorophores close enough thus leading to an intensified FRET signal. It has been known that Hg2+ binds to the cysteine residues in the binding motif of MerP with linear bicoordinate geometry. It is the movement of the residue F38 in the side chain of MerP responsible for different affinities exhibited by the metal ions. In the Hg2+-free form, the residue F38 is in the turn between the β-sheets and points toward the metal-binding loop while in the presence of Hg2+, the F38 residue points away from the loop [38]. The purified proteins also responded to methylmercury to a lower extent. This is in support of the previously published studies suggesting that MerP is only involved in the transport of Hg2+ and not methylmercury [57]. The sensor variants were also tested to determine if a change in the position of the cysteine residues in the binding pocket of MerP influences the selectivity order. The WT, S34A and S34C-C36A sensors bind Cd2+ also but with low affinity. However, the mutant S34C binds exclusively with Hg2+. Also, since this variant has the lowest K  d when compared to the WT sensor and other mutants, it was selected to carry out the cell-based assays.
Comparison of the metal specificity of wild-type MerFS and the three affinity mutants. The ratio change was tested in the presence of various metal ions such as Hg2+, MeHg+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, As3+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Fe2+. Data are means of three independent replicates (n = 3). Vertical bars indicate standard error
Fig. 5

Comparison of the metal specificity of wild-type MerFS and the three affinity mutants. The ratio change was tested in the presence of various metal ions such as Hg2+, MeHg+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, As3+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Fe2+. Data are means of three independent replicates (n = 3). Vertical bars indicate standard error

Intracellular monitoring of mercury uptake in bacterial cells

The cell-based study was performed by expressing MerFS-51 in E. coli cells. The FRET ratio (540/485 nm) was recorded for 2 h at regular intervals of every 5 min. The venus/ECFP emission ratio increases sharply after the addition of 0.5 µM mercury up to a certain time which then saturates with no further change in the FRET ratio. The ligand saturation curve was obtained by dispensing E. coli cell suspension in microtiter wells along with the addition of Hg2+ at a concentration of 0.5 µM externally and recording the 540/485 nm emission ratio in a time-dependent manner. The observation showed the cellular response of the nanosensor towards mercury ions. The results also indicated a sharp increase in FRET ratio upon the addition of Hg2+ which then saturates after a specific time. MerFS-control was also expressed in E. coli using the same protocol as stated above and the FRET ratio was calculated. The ratio change obtained adding Hg2+ was almost negligible, clearly proving the idea that is indeed the presence of these two cysteines residues in the binding pocket that are essential for binding of Hg2+ (Fig. 6). The bacterial cells expressing MerFS-51 were fixed on a glass slide using a medical adhesive and imaging of the cells was also carried out using a confocal microscope equipped with TCS-SPE confocal head. The confocal images showed successful expression of the genetically encoded MerFS-51 in E. coli (Fig. S3). Intracellular measurement of mercury uptake in bacterial cells showed a time-dependent response curve of MerFS-51 towards Hg2+. The findings are consistent with the ability of MerP to capture incoming Hg2+ by the two thiolate groups via the formation of a transient bidentate binding site [58]. Genetically encoded nanosensors allow non-invasive monitoring of metabolites with high spatial and temporal resolution [59].
Monitoring of mercury uptake in bacterial cells. The time-dependent response curve was obtained by measuring the FRET ratio after the incubation of bacterial cell suspension containing MerFS-51 with 0.5 µM mercury. 0.5 µM Hg2+ was also added to MerFS-control and the ratiometric change was obtained for the defined period. Data are means of three independent replicates (n = 3). Vertical bars indicate standard error
Fig. 6

Monitoring of mercury uptake in bacterial cells. The time-dependent response curve was obtained by measuring the FRET ratio after the incubation of bacterial cell suspension containing MerFS-51 with 0.5 µM mercury. 0.5 µM Hg2+ was also added to MerFS-control and the ratiometric change was obtained for the defined period. Data are means of three independent replicates (n = 3). Vertical bars indicate standard error

Live cell imaging of Hg2+ uptake in eukaryotes

S. cerevisiae strain BY4742 was transformed through Gateway technology to allow for the expression of MerFS-51 in the yeast cells. The expression was induced in the cells by 2% sucrose and 3% galactose to get a good FRET ratio. Imaging of the cells was performed on a confocal microscope using LAS-AF software (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The images indicated a large unstained vacuole and a highly fluorescent cytosolic region indicating the expression of MerFS-51 in the cytosol of the yeast cells (Fig. 7a). The dual emission 540/485 nm ratio was recorded for 10 min after the addition of 0.5 µM mercury ions using the excitation filter/slit (420/20 nm) and two emission filters/slits ECFP (485/20 nm) and venus (540/20 nm). The addition of Hg2+ over time decreases the fluorescence emission intensity of ECFP and increases the venus emission intensity representing the energy transfer (Fig. 7b). A change in venus/ECFP emission, apparently an increase in the FRET ratio was observed from 0.301 to 0.968 with Hg2+ up to 8 min which then saturates showing the uptake of Hg2+ ions in the yeast cytosol where it gets recognized by the MerFS-51. Conversely, no change in the ratio was acquired in the case of MerFS-control as eliminating the two cysteine residues from the binding motif GMTCSAC of MerP abolishes its binding to Hg2+ (Fig. 7c). Yeast cells expressing such fluorescent-based sensors have been used in past as model organisms to study the dynamic changes in the FRET ratio in response to the uptake of various metabolites [6062].
Real-time imaging of dynamic flux rate changes of Hg2+ uptake in yeast cells. a Confocal image showing expression of MerFS-51 in the cytosol of yeast S. cerevisiae (scale bar—5 μm). Yeast images are pseudocolored to demonstrate Hg2+-dependent ratio changes. b Fluorescence emission intensities of ECFP and venus in the presence of mercury. The addition of Hg2+ over time decreased the ECFP emission and increased the venus emission intensity representing the energy transfer. c The graph indicates 540/485 nm ratio change in the cytosol of single yeast cell expressing MerFS-51 in presence of 0.5 µM Hg2+. The ratiometric change obtained after the addition of 0.5 µM Hg2+ to the MerFS-control was also recorded and compared with the changes obtained with MerFS-51
Fig. 7

Real-time imaging of dynamic flux rate changes of Hg2+ uptake in yeast cells. a Confocal image showing expression of MerFS-51 in the cytosol of yeast S. cerevisiae (scale bar—5 μm). Yeast images are pseudocolored to demonstrate Hg2+-dependent ratio changes. b Fluorescence emission intensities of ECFP and venus in the presence of mercury. The addition of Hg2+ over time decreased the ECFP emission and increased the venus emission intensity representing the energy transfer. c The graph indicates 540/485 nm ratio change in the cytosol of single yeast cell expressing MerFS-51 in presence of 0.5 µM Hg2+. The ratiometric change obtained after the addition of 0.5 µM Hg2+ to the MerFS-control was also recorded and compared with the changes obtained with MerFS-51

Transfection of the mammalian HEK-293T cells with MerFS-51 was successfully attained using lipofectamine reagent. Confocal images of HEK-293T cells expressing MerFS-51 were obtained and intracellular analysis of Hg2+ uptake was performed in a time-dependent manner by recording the FRET ratio (540/485 nm) for 10 min (Fig. 8a). The venus/ECFP ratio increased rapidly from 0.301 after the addition of mercury ions which reached a saturation level of 0.949 at 8 min of incubation with 0.5 µM Hg2+. On the other hand, the HEK-293T cell line transfected by pcDNA3.1 (−) containing MerFS-control showed no significant changes in the FRET ratio (Fig. 8b). The result supports the findings of previous studies that a mutant lacking both the cysteine residues from the binding motif blocks the uptake of Hg2+ and therefore the ratio change obtained with the addition of Hg2+ was negligible. Cell-based study of the developed sensors in HEK-293T cells shows highly responsive FRET changes. Previously, similar FRET-based nanosensors have been reported to localize and detect metabolites like glycine betaine and lactate within the cellular and subcellular compartments of mammalian cells [63, 64].
Detection of Hg2+ uptake by of MerFS-51 in HEK-293T cell line. a Confocal image of mammalian HEK-293T cells expressing the nanosensor showing ECFP, venus, merge and ratiometric channels (Scalebar–3 μm). The ratiometric HEK-293T images are pseudocolored to demonstrate Hg2+-dependent ratio changes. b Time-dependent FRET ratio change in single HEK-293T cell separately expressing MerFS-51 and MerFS-control in the presence of externally supplied 0.5 µM Hg2+. The graph indicates the venus/ECFP ratio change for 10 min
Fig. 8

Detection of Hg2+ uptake by of MerFS-51 in HEK-293T cell line. a Confocal image of mammalian HEK-293T cells expressing the nanosensor showing ECFP, venus, merge and ratiometric channels (Scalebar–3 μm). The ratiometric HEK-293T images are pseudocolored to demonstrate Hg2+-dependent ratio changes. b Time-dependent FRET ratio change in single HEK-293T cell separately expressing MerFS-51 and MerFS-control in the presence of externally supplied 0.5 µM Hg2+. The graph indicates the venus/ECFP ratio change for 10 min

Cytotoxicity studies

Mercury is toxic for the human as well as other organisms [65]. We measured the FRET efficiencies of mercury nanosensor in HEK-293T human cells, so the cytotoxicity of mercury on these cells cannot be ignored. Thus to see the cytotoxicity of mercury, cell viability studies were carried out. The detection range of presented mercury sensor is 0.210–1.196 µM, thus cell toxicity studies were carried out in 0–5 µM range of mercury. It was found that the treatment of Hg2+ does not show significant toxicity to HEK-293T cells in the studied concentration range for 24 h exposure (Fig. 9). The cell viability result showed that treatment of mercury become toxic at higher concentration (˃ 2.5 μM), but in the detection range of nanosensor it is non-toxic to the cells.
Cell viability studies of mercury on HEK-293T. Viability of HEK-293T cells treated with increasing concentration of Hg2+ (0–5 μM) using MTT assay. Percent cell viability was calculated with respect to the untreated control cells
Fig. 9

Cell viability studies of mercury on HEK-293T. Viability of HEK-293T cells treated with increasing concentration of Hg2+ (0–5 μM) using MTT assay. Percent cell viability was calculated with respect to the untreated control cells

Conclusions

In contrast to the conventional methods that have been used so far for the quantification of Hg2+ ions in different biological samples, genetically encoded MerFS is cheap, offers limited toxicity, and is highly selective and sensitive. This sensor can monitor the toxic levels of Hg2+ ions at low concentrations at in vitro level and in cellular systems non-invasively. The constructed nanosensor responded to the changing levels of Hg2+ ions specifically. Affinity mutant sensors developed have altered binding constants (K  d) and varying dynamic ranges of Hg2+ detection at the in vitro level. Live cell imaging of the bacterial cells showed successful expression of the sensor MerFS-51. Owing to the bioaccumulation of methylmercury in fishes and shellfishes living in the marine environment, MerFS-51 can be an important ecological toolkit to monitor Hg2+ levels in bacteria and will aid in studying the transformation of Hg2+ into methylmercury. Moreover, after successful monitoring of Hg2+ levels in S. cerevisiae and HEK-293T cells, it is concluded that the developed nanosensor MerFS-51 can be a suitable tool to measure levels of Hg2+ ions in different eukaryotic single living cells to monitor the flux rate of Hg2+ in them, hence establishing the sensor’s efficacy in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. These measurements can be achieved with efficient spatiotemporal resolution and in real time. It is demonstrated with mercury, that a set of constructs could be obtained with heterogeneous affinity and ample FRET dynamics for cell-based applications.

Acknowledgements

The first author (NS) is thankful to University Grants Commission for Senior Research Fellowship. Financial Assistant in the form of research grant under nanobiotechnology scheme (No. BT/PR22248/NNT/28/1272/2017) from Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India for conducting this research work is gratefully acknowledged.

Author contributions

NS and MM designed the study and prepared the original manuscript. NS and MM conducted all in vitro and cellular experiments and analyzed the data. NS and MM did the live cell imaging of yeast and HEK cells and analyzed the data. AQ performed the cytotoxicity test. NS, MM and MAJ revised the manuscript. All authors were engaged in commenting on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1.

Ettema
TJ
,
Huynen
MA
,
de Vos
WM
,
van der Oost
J
TRASH: a novel metal-binding domain predicted to be involved in heavy-metal sensing, trafficking and resistance
 
Trends Biochem Sci
 
2003
 
28
 
4
 
170
 
173
 

2.

Wanekaya
AK
Applications of nanoscale carbon-based materials in heavy metal sensing and detection
 
Analyst
 
2011
 
136
 
4383
 
4391
 

3.

Srivastava
NK
,
Majumder
CB
Novel biofiltration methods for the treatment of heavy metals from industrial wastewater
 
J Hazard Mater
 
2008
 
151
 
1
 
1
 
8
 

4.

Nies
DH
Microbial heavy-metal resistance
 
Appl Microbiol Biot
 
1999
 
51
 
6
 
730
 
750
 

5.

Aragay
G
,
Pons
J
,
Merkoçi
A
Recent trends in macro-, micro-, and nanomaterial-based tools and strategies for heavy-metal detection
 
Chem Rev
 
2011
 
111
 
5
 
3433
 
3458
 

6.

Gu
Z
,
Zhao
M
,
Sheng
Y
,
Bentolila
LA
,
Tang
Y
Detection of mercury ion by infrared fluorescent protein and its hydrogel-based paper assay
 
Anal Chem
 
2011
 
83
 
6
 
2324
 
2329
 

7.

Opella
SJ
,
DeSilva
TM
,
Veglia
G
Structural biology of metal-binding sequences
 
Curr Opin Chem Biol
 
2002
 
6
 
2
 
217
 
223
 

8.

Saleem
M
,
Rafiq
M
,
Hanif
M
Organic material based fluorescent sensor for Hg2+: a brief review on recent development
 
J Fluoresc
 
2017
 
27
 
1
 
31
 
58
 

9.

WHO (2005) Mercury in Drinking-water. (Vol. WHO/SDE/WSH/05.08/10): World Health Organization

10.

Gray
JE
,
Theodorakos
PM
,
Fey
DL
,
Krabbenhoft
DP
Mercury concentrations and distribution in soil, water, mine waste leachates, and air in and around mercury mines in the Big Bend region, Texas, USA
 
Environ Geochem Health
 
2015
 
37
 
35
 
48
 

11.

Ye
BJ
,
Kim
BG
,
Jeon
MJ
,
Kim
SY
,
Kim
HC
,
Jang
TW
,
Chae
HJ
,
Choi
WJ
,
Ha
MN
,
Hong
YS
Evaluation of mercury exposure level, clinical diagnosis and treatment for mercury intoxication
 
Ann Occup Environ Med
 
2016
 
28
 
5
 4724159

12.

Zeyaullah
M
,
Islam
B
,
Ali
A
Isolation, identification and PCR amplification of merA gene from highly mercury polluted Yamuna river
 
Afr J Biotechnol
 
2010
 
9
 
24
 
3510
 
3514

13.

Jiqu
H
,
Qixia
Y
A core-shell structured inorganic-organic hybrid nanocomposite for Hg(II) sensing and removal
 
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc
 
2015
 
149
 
487
 
493
 

14.

Chapleau
RR
,
Blomberg
R
,
Ford
PC
,
Sagermann
M
Design of a highly specific and noninvasive biosensor suitable for real-time in vivo imaging of mercury (II) uptake
 
Protein Sci
 
2008
 
17
 
4
 
614
 
622
 2271171

15.

Kobal
AB
,
Horvat
M
,
Prezelj
M
,
Briski
AS
,
Krsnik
M
,
Dizdarevic
T
,
Mazej
D
,
Falnoga
I
,
Stibilj
V
,
Arneric
N
,
Kobal
D
,
Osredkar
J
The impact of long-term past exposure to elemental mercury on antioxidative capacity and lipid peroxidation in mercury miners
 
J Trace Elem Med Biol
 
2004
 
17
 
4
 
261
 
274
 

16.

Srikanth
K
,
Ahmad
I
,
Rao
JV
,
Trindade
T
,
Duarte
AC
,
Pereira
E
Modulation of glutathione and its dependent enzymes in gill cells of Anguilla anguilla exposed to silica coated iron oxide nanoparticles with or without mercury co-exposure under in vitro condition
 
Comp Biochem Phys C
 
2014
 
162
 
7
 
14
 

17.

Linšak
Ž
,
Linšak
DT
,
Špirić
Z
,
Srebočan
E
,
Glad
M
,
Milin
Č
Effects of mercury on glutathione and glutathione-dependent enzymes in hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas)
 
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng
 
2013
 
48
 
11
 
1325
 
1332
 

18.

Malcik
N
,
Oktar
O
,
Ozser
ME
,
Caglar
P
,
Bushby
L
,
Vaughan
A
,
Kuswandi
B
,
Narayanaswamy
R
Immobilised reagents for optical heavy metal ions sensing
 
Sens Actuators B Chem
 
1998
 
53
 
3
 
211
 
221
 

19.

Gumpu
MB
,
Sethuraman
S
,
Krishnan
UM
,
Bosco
J
,
Rayappan
B
A review on detection of heavy metal ions in water – An electrochemical approach
 
Sens Actuators B Chem
 
2015
 
213
 
515
 
533
 

20.

Corbisier
P
,
van der Lelie
D
,
Borremans
B
,
Provoost
A
,
de Lorenzo
V
,
Brown
NL
,
Lloyd
JR
,
Hobman
JL
,
Csöregi
E
,
Johansson
G
,
Mattiasson
B
Whole cell- and protein-based biosensors for the detection of bioavailable heavy metals in environmental samples
 
Anal Chim Acta
 
1999
 
387
 
3
 
235
 
244
 

21.

Bagheri
H
,
Afkhami
A
,
Khoshsafar
H
,
Rezaei
M
,
Shirzadmehr
A
Simultaneous electrochemical determination of heavy metals using a triphenylphosphine/MWCNTs composite carbon ionic liquid electrode
 
Sens Actuators B Chem
 
2013
 
186
 
451
 
460
 

22.

Bontidean
I
,
Ahlqvist
J
,
Mulchandani
A
,
Chen
W
,
Bae
W
,
Mehra
RK
,
Mortari
A
,
Csöregi
E
Novel synthetic phytochelatin-based capacitive biosensor for heavy metal ion detection
 
Biosens Bioelectron
 
2003
 
18
 
5–6
 
547
 
553
 

23.

Malitesta
C
,
Guascito
MR
Heavy metal determination by biosensors based on enzyme immobilised by electropolymerisation
 
Biosens Bioelectron
 
2005
 
20
 
8
 
1643
 
1647
 

24.

Nevado
JJ
,
Martin-Doimeadios
RC
,
Bernardo
FJ
,
Moreno
MJ
Determination of mercury species in fish reference materials by gas chromatography-atomic fluorescence detection after closed-vessel microwave-assisted extraction
 
J Chromatogr A
 
2005
 
1093
 
1–2
 
21
 
28
 

25.

Coronado
E
,
Galan-Mascaros
JR
,
Marti-Gastaldo
C
,
Palomares
E
,
Durrant
JR
,
Vilar
R
,
Gratzel
M
,
Nazeeruddin
MK
Reversible colorimetric probes for mercury sensing
 
J Am Chem Soc
 
2005
 
127
 
35
 
12351
 
12356
 

26.

Ko
SK
,
Yang
YK
,
Tae
J
,
Shin
I
In vivo monitoring of mercury ions using a rhodamine-based molecular probe
 
J Am Chem Soc
 
2006
 
128
 
43
 
14150
 
14155
 

27.

Yoon
S
,
Albers
AE
,
Wong
AP
,
Chang
CJ
Screening mercury levels in fish with a selective fluorescent chemosensor
 
J Am Chem Soc
 
2005
 
127
 
46
 
16030
 
16031
 

28.

Song
J
,
Huai
M
,
Wang
C
,
Xu
Z
,
Zhao
Y
,
Ye
Y
A new FRET ratiometric fluorescent chemosensor for Hg2+ and its application in living EC 109 cells
 
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc
 
2015
 
139
 
549
 
554
 

29.

Hu
B
,
Hu
LL
,
Chen
ML
,
Wang
JH
A FRET ratiometric fluorescence sensing system for mercury detection and intracellular colorimetric imaging in live Hela cells
 
Biosens Bioelectron
 
2013
 
49
 
499
 
505
 

30.

Ma
C
,
Zeng
F
,
Huang
L
,
Wu
S
FRET-based ratiometric detection system for mercury ions in water with polymeric particles as scaffolds
 
J Phys Chem B
 
2011
 
115
 
5
 
874
 
882
 

31.

Resch-Genger
U
,
Grabolle
M
,
Cavaliere-Jaricot
S
,
Nitschke
R
,
Nann
T
Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels
 
Nat Methods
 
2008
 
5
 
9
 
763
 
775
 

32.

Rowland
CE
,
Brown
CW
 III
,
Medintz
IL
,
Delehanty
JB
Intracellular FRET-based probes: a review
 
Methods Appl Fluores
 
2015
 
3
 
4
 
042006
 

33.

Ma
L
,
Yang
F
,
Zheng
J
Application of fluorescence resonance energy transfer in protein studies
 
J Mol Struct
 
2014
 
1077
 
87
 
100
 4215735

34.

Gupta
S
,
Sarkar
S
,
Katranidis
A
,
Bhattacharya
J
Development of a cell-free optical biosensor for detection of a broad range of mercury contaminants in water: a plasmid DNA-based approach
 
ACS Omega
 
2019
 
4
 
9480
 
9487
 6648214

35.

Hwang
E
,
Song
J
,
Zhang
J
Integration of nanomaterials and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer techniques for sensing biomolecules
 
Biosensors
 
2019
 
9
 
1
 
42
 6468577

36.

Carter
KP
,
Young
AM
,
Palmer
AE
Fluorescent sensors for measuring metal ions in living systems
 
Chem Rev
 
2014
 
114
 
8
 
4564
 
4601
 4096685

37.

White
BR
,
Liljestrand
HM
,
Holcombe
JA
A ‘turn-on’ FRET peptide sensor based on the mercury binding protein MerP
 
Analyst
 
2008
 
133
 
1
 
65
 
70
 

38.

DeSilva
TM
,
Veglia
G
,
Opella
SJ
Solution Structures of the Reduced and Cu(I) Bound Forms of the First Metal Binding Sequence of ATP7A Associated with Menkes Disease
 
Proteins
 
2005
 
61
 
4
 
1038
 
1049
 

39.

DeSilva
TM
,
Veglia
G
,
Porcelli
F
,
Prantner
AM
,
Opella
SJ
Selectivity in heavy metal- binding to peptides and proteins
 
Biopolymers
 
2002
 
64
 
4
 
189
 
197
 

40.

Vinkenborg
JL
,
van Duijnhoven
SM
,
Merkx
M
Reengineering of a fluorescent zinc sensor protein yields the first genetically encoded cadmium probe
 
Chem Commun (Camb)
 
2011
 
47
 
43
 
11879
 
11881
 

41.

Okumoto
S
,
Looger
LL
,
Micheva
KD
,
Reimer
RJ
,
Smith
SJ
,
Frommer
WB
Detection of glutamate release from neurons by genetically encoded surface-displayed FRET nanosensors
 
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
2005
 
102
 
24
 
8740
 
8745
 

42.

Queen
A
,
Khan
P
,
Idrees
D
,
Azam
A
,
Hassan
MI
Biological evaluation of p-toluene sulphonylhydrazone as carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors: an approach to fight hypoxia-induced tumors
 
Int J Biol Macromol
 
2018
 
106
 
840
 
850
 

43.

Khan
P
,
Rahman
S
,
Queen
A
,
Manzoor
S
,
Naz
F
,
Hasan
GM
,
Luqman
S
,
Kim
J
,
Islam
A
,
Ahmad
F
,
Hassan
MI
Elucidation of dietary polyphenolics as potential inhibitor of microtubule affinity regulating kinase 4: in silico and in vitro studies
 
Sci Rep
 
2017
 
7
 
1
 
9470
 5573368

44.

Voura
M
,
Khan
P
,
Thysiadis
S
,
Katsamakas
S
,
Queen
A
,
Hasan
GM
,
Ali
S
,
Sarli
V
,
Hassan
MI
Probing the inhibition of microtubule affinity regulating kinase 4 by N-substituted acridones
 
Sci Rep
 
2019
 
9
 
1
 
1676
 6368574

45.

Ko
W
,
Kim
S
,
Lee
HS
Engineering a periplasmic binding protein for amino acid sensors with improved binding properties
 
Org Biomol Chem
 
2017
 
15
 
41
 
8761
 
8769
 

46.

Richarme
G
,
Caldas
TD
Chaperone Properties of the Bacterial Periplasmic Substrate-binding Proteins
 
J Biol Chem
 
1997
 
272
 
15607
 
15612
 

47.

Chu
BCH
,
Otten
R
,
Krewulak
KD
,
Mulder
FAA
,
Vogel
HJ
The solution structure, binding properties, and dynamics of the bacterial siderophore-binding protein FepB
 
J Biol Chem
 
2014
 
289
 
42
 
29219
 
29234
 4200274

48.

de Lorimier
RM
,
Smith
JJ
,
Dwyer
MA
,
Looger
LL
,
Sali
KM
,
Paavola
CD
,
Rizk
SS
,
Sadigov
S
,
Conrad
DW
,
Loew
L
,
Hellinga
HW
Construction of a fluorescent biosensor family
 
Protein Sci
 
2002
 
11
 
11
 
2655
 
2675
 2373719

49.

Shosham
MS
,
Tshuva
EY
The MXCXXC class of metallochaperone proteins: model studies
 
Chem Soc
 
2011
 
40
 
11
 
5282
 
5292
 

50.

Kiyono
M
,
Pan-Hou
H
Genetic engineering of bacteria for environmental remediation of mercury
 
j health Sci
 
2006
 
52
 
3
 
199
 
204
 

51.

Veglia
G
,
Porcelli
F
,
DeSilva
T
,
Prantner
A
,
Opella
SJ
The structure of the metal-binding motif GMTCAAC is similar in an 18-residue linear peptide and the mercury binding protein MerP
 
J Am Chem Soc
 
2000
 
122
 
10
 
2389
 
2390
 

52.

Fehr
M
,
Okumoto
S
,
Deuschle
K
,
Lager
I
,
Looger
LL
,
Persson
J
,
Kozhukh
L
,
Lalonde
S
,
Frommer
WB
Development and use of fluorescent nanosensors for metabolite imaging in living cells
 
Biochem Soc Trans
 
2005
 
33
 
1
 
287
 
290
 

53.

Mohsin
M
,
Ahmad
A
,
Iqbal
M
FRET-based genetically-encoded sensors for quantitative monitoring of metabolites
 
Biotechnol Lett
 
2015
 
37
 
10
 
1919
 
1928
 

54.

Orij
R
,
Postmus
J
,
Ter Beek
A
,
Brul
S
,
Smits
GJ
In vivo measurement of cytosolic and mitochondrial pH using a pH-sensitive GFP derivative in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a relation between intracellular pH and growth
 
Microbiology
 
2009
 
155
 
1
 
268
 
278
 

55.

Zhang
J
,
Campbell
RE
,
Ting
AY
,
Tsien
RY
Creating new fluorescent probes for cell biology
 
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
 
2002
 
3
 
12
 
906
 
918
 

56.

Steele
RA
,
Opella
SJ
Structures of the reduced and mercury-bound forms of MerP, the periplasmic protein from the bacterial mercury detoxification system
 
Biochemistry
 
1997
 
36
 
23
 
6885
 
6895
 

57.

Kiyono
M
,
Omura
T
,
Fujimori
H
,
Pan-Hou
H
Lack of involvement of merT and merP in methylmercury transport in mercury resistant Pseudomonas K-62
 
FEMS Microbiol Lett
 
1995
 
128
 
3
 
301
 
306
 

58.

Chang
CC
,
Lin
LY
,
Zou
XW
,
Huang
CC
,
Chan
NL
Structural basis of the mercury (II)-mediated conformational switching of the dual-function transcriptional regulator MerR
 
Nucleic Acids Res
 
2015
 
43
 
15
 
7612
 
7623
 4551924

59.

Honda
A
,
Adams
SR
,
Sawyer
CL
,
Lev-Ram
V
,
Tsien
RY
,
Dostmann
WR
Spatiotemporal dynamics of guanosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate revealed by a genetically encoded, fluorescent indicator
 
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
2001
 
98
 
5
 
2437
 
2442
 

60.

Ahmad
M
,
Mohsin
M
,
Iqrar
S
,
Manzoor
O
,
Siddiqi
TO
,
Ahmad
A
Live cell imaging of vitamin B12 dynamics by genetically encoded fluorescent nanosensor
 
Sens Actuators B Chem
 
2018
 
257
 
866
 
874
 

61.

Soleja
N
,
Manzoor
O
,
Nandal
P
,
Mohsin
M
FRET-based nanosensors for monitoring and quantification of alcohols in living cells
 
Org Biomol Chem
 
2019
 
17
 
9
 
2413
 
2422
 

62.

Manzoor
O
,
Soleja
N
,
Khan
P
,
Hassan
MI
,
Mohsin
M
Visualization of thiamine in living cells using genetically encoded fluorescent nanosensor
 
Biochem Eng J
 
2019
 
146
 
170
 
178
 

63.

Ahmad
M
,
Ameen
S
,
Siddiqi
TO
,
Khan
P
,
Ahmad
A
Live cell monitoring of glycine betaine by FRET-based genetically encoded nanosensor
 
Biosens Bioelectron
 
2016
 
86
 
169
 
175
 

64.

San Martín
A
,
Ceballo
S
,
Ruminot
I
,
Lerchundi
R
,
Frommer
WB
,
Barros
LF
A Genetically Encoded FRET Lactate Sensor and Its Use to Detect the Warburg Effect in Single Cancer Cells
 
PLoS ONE
 
2013
 
8
 
2
 
e57712
 3582500

65.

Kim
JJ
,
Kim
YS
,
Kumar
V
Heavy metal toxicity: an update of chelating therapeutic strategies
 
J Trace Elem Med Biol
 
2019
 
54
 
226
 
231
 

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data