1-20 of 634
Sort by
Journal Article
Sophia D Casetta
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf009, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf009
Published: 22 April 2025
Journal Article
Patrick Dumberry
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf017, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf017
Published: 03 April 2025
Journal Article
Thomas Schultz and Cédric Dupont
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf012, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf012
Published: 30 March 2025
Image
Published: 30 March 2025
Figure 1. Average investor protection over time (1990–2020). Source: Biffi, Schultz, Yüksel, forthcoming
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Map 2. Latin American and Caribbean states in advisory proceedings (1946-November 2024).
Journal Article
Deyan Draguiev
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf014, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf014
Published: 28 March 2025
Journal Article
Ignacio De la Rasilla
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idae024, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idae024
Published: 28 March 2025
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Map 3. Global map of declarations under Article 36.2. of the ICJ Statute (2024).
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Map 4. Global map of participations in advisory opinions (1946–2024).
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Figure 1. The optional clause—percentages of acceptance by un regional groups (2024).
Image
Published: 28 March 2025
Map 1. Latin America and the Caribbean in ICJ Contentious Proceedings (1946–November 2024)
Journal Article
Raelee Toh
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf013, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf013
Published: 27 March 2025
Image
Published: 21 March 2025
Figure 1. Global South approaches to the international investment regime. A semicircle gauge illustrating various approaches to engaging with the international investment regime, ranging from ‘engagement by default’ to ‘radical disengagement’, with intermediate approaches in between.
Journal Article
Fabio C Morosini and Ely Caetano Xavier Junior
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf010, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf010
Published: 21 March 2025
Journal Article
Chen Yu
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf016, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf016
Published: 21 March 2025
Journal Article
Xu Qian and Fang Gu
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf007, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf007
Published: 14 March 2025
Journal Article
Zhaoran Lin
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf008, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf008
Published: 14 March 2025
Journal Article
Elizabeth Sheargold
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf011, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf011
Published: 14 March 2025
Journal Article
Claiton Fyock
Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idae027, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idae027
Published: 14 March 2025
Image
Published: 14 March 2025
Figure 1. A Table of Trachurus murphyi catch limits from the adoption of CMM 1.01 to CMM 01-2018. See The 2018 Findings and Recommendations (n 7) 10.