-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Xu Qian, Fang Gu, Reconceptualizing counterclaim assessment in investment treaty arbitration: a discourse on fairness through Rawlsian justice theory, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 16, Issue 2, June 2025, idaf007, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaf007
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
The article delves into the intricate dynamics of counterclaims within the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) system. It critically evaluates the asymmetry and fairness concerns associated with ISDS, advocating for a recalibrated approach through the lens of Rawlsian justice. The article further explores the viability of counterclaims as a mechanism to address the imbalances between investors and host states, underscoring the necessity for a more equitable legal framework. By integrating John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, the article proposes a novel interpretative paradigm that aims to enhance the fairness and legitimacy of counterclaims in ISDS. This approach seeks to balance the rights and obligations of involved parties, ensuring a just resolution of disputes while fostering a fairer arbitration environment.