-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
David G. Addiss, Kathleen A. Dimock, Mark L. Eberhard, Patrick J. Lammie, Clinical, Parasitologic, And Immunologic Observations Of Patients With Hydrocele And Elephantiasis In An Area With Endemic Lymphatic Filariasis, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 171, Issue 3, March 1995, Pages 755–758, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/171.3.755
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Hydrocele and elephantiasis, major clinical manifestations of bancroftian filariasis, are thought to share a common pathogenesis. The characteristics of 121 patients with hydrocele or elephantiasis in Leogane, Haiti, were compared: 39% of 57 men with hydrocele and 3% of 64 persons with lymphedema of the leg were microfilaria-positive (P < .001). Circulating filarial antigen, presumably from the adult worm, was detected in 15 (43%) microfilaria-negative men with hydrocele and 9 (15%) microfilaria-negative persons with leg edema (P = .004). Microfilaria-positive men had lower levels of filaria-specific IgG1 and hydroceles of significantly smaller volume and shorter duration than did microfilaria-negative men; hydrocele volume was inversely associated with microfilarial density (P = .001). In contrast, filarial antigen but not microfilariae was associated with filaria-specific IgG4 and decreased lymphocyte proliferation. Antigen status was not associated with severity of leg edema. In this filariasis-endemic area, men with hydrocele are more immunologically and parasitologically heterogeneous than are persons with elephantiasis.