Extract

In this editorial, I focus on studies that address organizational and individual expertise and experience in engaging with digital health innovations. This is consistent with the epistemic injustice component of the additional goal for JAMIA that was described in the first editorial of 2024: To exemplify best practices in publishing to advance health equity and justice through promoting (1) diversity, equity, and inclusion in editorial team and processes; (2) use of inclusive and nonstigmatizing language; and (3) innovative, rigorous, and transparent quantitative and qualitative research methods that address fairness and mitigate epistemic injustice.1 Epistemic injustice is the failure to treat individuals as knowers.2 The complex digital health ecosystem demands consideration of the knowledge of all stakeholders to advance the goals of quality and equity. The papers in this issue consider the knowledge of digital health companies, community-based organizations (CBOs), staff members in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FHQCs), and healthcare consumers and patients.

You do not currently have access to this article.