https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-9583
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Tad T Brunyé, Kelsey Booth, Dalit Hendel, Kathleen F Kerr, Hannah Shucard, Donald L Weaver, Joann G Elmore, Machine learning classification of diagnostic accuracy in pathologists interpreting breast biopsies, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Volume 31, Issue 3, March 2024, Pages 552–562, https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad232
Close - Share Icon Share
Abstract
This study explores the feasibility of using machine learning to predict accurate versus inaccurate diagnoses made by pathologists based on their spatiotemporal viewing behavior when evaluating digital breast biopsy images.
The study gathered data from 140 pathologists of varying experience levels who each reviewed a set of 14 digital whole slide images of breast biopsy tissue. Pathologists’ viewing behavior, including zooming and panning actions, was recorded during image evaluation. A total of 30 features were extracted from the viewing behavior data, and 4 machine learning algorithms were used to build classifiers for predicting diagnostic accuracy.
The Random Forest classifier demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving a test accuracy of 0.81 and area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of 0.86. Features related to attention distribution and focus on critical regions of interest were found to be important predictors of diagnostic accuracy. Further including case-level and pathologist-level information incrementally improved classifier performance.
Results suggest that pathologists’ viewing behavior during digital image evaluation can be leveraged to predict diagnostic accuracy, affording automated feedback and decision support systems based on viewing behavior to aid in training and, ultimately, clinical practice. They also carry implications for basic research examining the interplay between perception, thought, and action in diagnostic decision-making.
The classifiers developed herein have potential applications in training and clinical settings to provide timely feedback and support to pathologists during diagnostic decision-making. Further research could explore the generalizability of these findings to other medical domains and varied levels of expertise.
