Abstract

Infections caused by drug-resistant pathogens are on the rise. Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide with activity against most Gram-positive pathogens, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, is a newly US-FDA approved antimicrobial for complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Daptomycin has a unique mechanism of action that results in destruction of the membrane potential. The rapid bactericidal activity of daptomycin makes it an attractive antibiotic for serious Gram-positive infections.

Introduction

The increase in infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens and the rise in antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains have prompted the need for novel antibiotics.1,2 Recent reports indicate that more than 25% of Staphylococcus aureus infections in Europe are caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and the majority of these isolates are resistant to additional antibiotics.3 The incidence of MRSA varies greatly by country. Over 50% of S. aureus isolates in Portugal and Italy are methicillin-resistant, isolates in England, Greece, and France have MRSA rates around 25%, whereas the Netherlands and Switzerland have the lowest incidence of MRSA.3 Vancomycin has been an effective antibiotic against MRSA; however, the increased use of vancomycin has led to the development of isolates with reduced susceptibility. The mechanism of reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in S. aureus has not been fully elucidated and appears to be heterogeneous. Reduced susceptibility to vancomycin is correlated with alterations in the bacterial cell wall leading to significantly thicker and more disorganized cell walls.4 These thicker cell walls may sequester the vancomycin from reaching the target nascent cell wall precursors.4 Additional in vitro studies have linked development of vancomycin reduced susceptibility with phenotypic changes such as loss of haemolysis and the mecA gene, and genotypic changes such as the presence of either the group I or group II polymorphism in the agr gene locus.57

To date, three vancomycin-resistant S. aureus strains (VRSA) have been isolated in the United States.811 Both the Pennsylvania and the New York strains were isolated from patients not on vancomycin therapy.9,12 Therefore, the need for new potent antimicrobial agents with MRSA activity is essential.

Mechanism of action

Daptomycin, a fermentation product produced by Streptomyces roseosporus, is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic with potent bactericidal activity against most Gram-positive organisms including multiple antibiotic-resistant and -susceptible strains.1321 Daptomycin was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) associated with S. aureus (methicillin-susceptible, MSSA, and methicillin-resistant, MRSA), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis and Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycin-susceptible only). Below, we discuss the in vitro potency of daptomycin against a range of other organisms including vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis and Enterococcus faecium.

The unique structure of daptomycin consists of a 13-member amino acid cyclic lipopeptide with a decanoyl side-chain (Figure 1). This distinctive structure confers a novel mechanism of action.22 The proposed mechanism involves insertion of the lipophilic daptomycin tail into the bacterial cell membrane, causing rapid membrane depolarization and a potassium ion efflux. This is followed by arrest of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis resulting in bacterial cell death (Figure 2).2224 The bactericidal effect of daptomycin is rapid with greater than 99.9% of both MRSA and MSSA bacteria dead in less than 1 h.25,26 This rapid cell death does not result in rapid bacterial cell lysis.24 Daptomycin also remains bactericidal (99.9% kill within 24 h) against stationary phase cultures of both MSSA and MRSA present at high density (109 cfu) in a simulated endocardial vegetation model.27

Microbiology

In vitro potency has been demonstrated for daptomycin against a range of aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria including multidrug-resistant strains.1321,28 MIC90 values along with MIC ranges for select pathogens can be found in Table 1. The table shows data from two recent studies illustrating the conserved MIC ranges and values for both European strains and isolates collected worldwide. Daptomycin's spectrum of activity encompasses the difficult to treat antibiotic-resistant organisms including methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, MSSA), glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (CoNS), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE).1321 Daptomycin demonstrated potency against the recently isolated vancomycin-resistant S. aureus as well as linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin-resistant S. aureus and E. faecium.14,1720,24 Furthermore, daptomycin is also effective against a variety of streptococcal groups such as the β-haemolytic streptococci including S. pyogenes (Group A) and S. agalactiae (Group B) as well as other Streptococcus spp.1315,20,21 Along with the commonly isolated Gram-positive organisms, daptomycin is also potent against Corynebacterium jeikeium, and a variety of anaerobic species including Peptostreptococcus spp., Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium difficile, and Propionibacterium acnes (Table 1).28 Drug synergy with daptomycin has been described in vitro with aminoglycosides and rifampicin antibiotics.29

Resistance

Daptomycin's efficacy is enhanced by the near absence of antibiotic resistance as verified by both in vitro and clinical studies.30 Resistance to daptomycin has been difficult to generate in the laboratory both in single passage and serial passage experi ments.30 The emergence of resistance was <0.2% across the entire set of Phase II and III clinical trials with over 1000 daptomycin-treated patients. The reason for this decrease in susceptibility is unknown and no transferable elements conferring daptomycin resistance have been isolated.

Pharmacology

Analysis of daptomycin pharmacodynamics determined that a once-daily dosing regimen increases the efficacy and safety of daptomycin.31In vitro and in vivo analysis established that daptomycin is effective in a concentration-dependent manner, has a long half-life (8 h), and demonstrates a prolonged post-antibiotic effect up to 6.8 h (Table 2).32 These findings resulted in a once a day dosing regimen recommendation of 4 mg/kg for complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) in the United States.

Once-daily dosing of daptomycin results in linear pharmacokinetics with minimal drug accumulation.31 Daptomycin distributes primarily in the plasma, with penetration to vascular tissues (Table 3). Daptomycin does not cross the blood–brain barrier and does not penetrate the cerebrospinal fluid of normal individuals. However, there was a 5% penetration (relative to serum) of daptomycin into the cerebrospinal fluid of rabbits with Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis, resulting in clearance of the infection in this model.33 Daptomycin is primarily renally excreted, with the majority of the drug remaining intact in the urine.31 Since daptomycin is excreted through the kidneys, the dosing interval is increased to every 48 h in patients with severe renal impairment defined as a creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min. Because of daptomycin's unique mechanism of action and because it is not metabolized by cytochrome p450 or other hepatic enzymes, no antagonistic drug interactions have been observed.

Pre-clinical studies

In pre-clinical studies, daptomycin treatment has been linked to fully reversible skeletal muscle toxicity with no effect on smooth or cardiac muscle. Animal studies determined that both degenerative and regenerative changes are observed in skeletal muscle with no rhabdomyolysis.31 These effects, which can be associated with elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels, are fully reversible after cessation of daptomycin use and were not statistically significant when compared with comparator.31 The numbers of side effects for patients receiving daptomycin were comparable to standard therapy and less than 2% of patients receiving daptomycin discontinued therapy.34 The most common adverse events from the Phase III cSSSI clinical trials for daptomycin and comparator drugs are listed in Table 4.

The efficacy of daptomycin against a range of infections has been demonstrated in animal studies. Using a variety of antibiotic-resistant and -sensitive Gram-positive bacteria, daptomycin eradicated infections in the blood, muscle, kidney, heart and bone tissues of animals.3541 These results show promise for daptomycin therapy for further clinical indications. An ongoing Phase III clinical trial is in progress to determine the efficacy of 6 mg/kg daptomycin once a day for endocarditis and bacteraemia caused by S. aureus.

Clinical studies

Daptomycin was evaluated in two large investigator-blinded, randomized, multicentre cSSSI studies in Europe, South Africa and the United States.34 Adults with cSSSI of known or suspected Gram-positive aetiology were enrolled. The predominant cSSSI infections studied included wound infections, major abscesses and ulcer infections. Daptomycin was compared with conventional therapy of a semi-synthetic penicillin (e.g. nafcillin, oxacillin, cloxacillin, or flucloxacillin) or vancomycin (for suspected MRSA). The clinical success rates for each treatment group (intent to treat, modified intent to treat, clinically evaluable, and microbiologically evaluable) are shown in Table 5.34 The study was designed to determine whether daptomycin was comparable to standard therapy and was not powered to show superiority. Therefore, statistical analysis determined that in the clinical trails, daptomycin was non-inferior to comparator therapy leading to daptomycin approval by the FDA in the United States.34 Results of the microbiologically evaluable population are detailed by pathogen in Table 6.34 Over 1000 patients were evaluated, and the following pathogens were the predominant organisms isolated; MSSA, MRSA, S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis, and E. faecalis. The results from these Phase III trials confirmed the efficacy and safety of daptomycin.

Conclusions

In summary, daptomycin is a rapidly bactericidal antibiotic that is active against clinically relevant Gram-positive bacteria including antibiotic-resistant strains. Clinical data demonstrate that daptomycin is highly effective against cSSSI and ongoing clinical trials including infectious endocarditis caused by S. aureus, should expand treatment indications. The low occurrence of side effects, low resistance rates, and high potency demonstrate that daptomycin has significant clinical utility in the treatment of Gram-positive infections, including those caused by MRSA.

Daptomycin chemical structure.
Figure 1.

Daptomycin chemical structure.

Daptomycin mechanism of action. Hypothetical steps: step 1, daptomycin binds to the cytoplasmic membrane in a calcium-dependent manner; step 2, daptomycin oligomerizes, disrupting the membrane; step 3, the release of intracellular ions and rapid cell death.
Figure 2.

Daptomycin mechanism of action. Hypothetical steps: step 1, daptomycin binds to the cytoplasmic membrane in a calcium-dependent manner; step 2, daptomycin oligomerizes, disrupting the membrane; step 3, the release of intracellular ions and rapid cell death.

Table 1.

In vitro activity of daptomycin against select Gram-positive bacteria

OrganismNo. of strainsMIC range (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)Reference
Select aerobic pathogens
    Staphylococcus aureus
        oxacillin-resistant
         European isolates3340.12–10.514
         worldwide isolates1247 ≤ 0.12–10.521
        oxacillin-susceptible
         European isolates888 ≤ 0.015–10.514
         worldwide isolates1955 ≤ 0.12–20.521
    Coagulase-negative staphylococcia
        European isolates10400.03–10.514
        worldwide isolates838 ≤ 0.12–20.521
    β-Haemolytic streptococci
        European isolatesb3670.06–10.2514
        worldwide isolates247 ≤ 0.12–0.50.2521
    Enterococcus faecalis
        vancomycin-susceptible
         European isolates1789 ≤ 0.015–4214
         worldwide isolates626 ≤ 0.12–4121
        vancomycin-resistant
         European isolates40 ≤ 0.5–4214
         worldwide isolates200.25–1121
    Enterococcus faecium
        vancomycin-susceptible
         European isolates3330.03–8414
         worldwide isolates97 ≤ 0.12–8421
        vancomycin-resistant
         European isolates1140.25–4414
         worldwide isolates550.25–4421
    Enterococcus spp.c
        European isolates160 ≤ 0.015–4414
        worldwide isolates210.5–4221
    Corynebacterium jeikeium100.125–0.50.2528
Select anaerobic pathogens
    Actinomyces group220.06–16.0428
    Bifidobacterium spp.13 < 0.03–1.00.528
    Clostridium difficile180.125–1.0128
    Clostridium perfringens110.06–0.50.528
    Lactobacillus spp.d37 < 0.03–32.01628
    Peptostreptococcus spp.140.125–1128
    Propionibacterium spp.150.125–2228
OrganismNo. of strainsMIC range (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)Reference
Select aerobic pathogens
    Staphylococcus aureus
        oxacillin-resistant
         European isolates3340.12–10.514
         worldwide isolates1247 ≤ 0.12–10.521
        oxacillin-susceptible
         European isolates888 ≤ 0.015–10.514
         worldwide isolates1955 ≤ 0.12–20.521
    Coagulase-negative staphylococcia
        European isolates10400.03–10.514
        worldwide isolates838 ≤ 0.12–20.521
    β-Haemolytic streptococci
        European isolatesb3670.06–10.2514
        worldwide isolates247 ≤ 0.12–0.50.2521
    Enterococcus faecalis
        vancomycin-susceptible
         European isolates1789 ≤ 0.015–4214
         worldwide isolates626 ≤ 0.12–4121
        vancomycin-resistant
         European isolates40 ≤ 0.5–4214
         worldwide isolates200.25–1121
    Enterococcus faecium
        vancomycin-susceptible
         European isolates3330.03–8414
         worldwide isolates97 ≤ 0.12–8421
        vancomycin-resistant
         European isolates1140.25–4414
         worldwide isolates550.25–4421
    Enterococcus spp.c
        European isolates160 ≤ 0.015–4414
        worldwide isolates210.5–4221
    Corynebacterium jeikeium100.125–0.50.2528
Select anaerobic pathogens
    Actinomyces group220.06–16.0428
    Bifidobacterium spp.13 < 0.03–1.00.528
    Clostridium difficile180.125–1.0128
    Clostridium perfringens110.06–0.50.528
    Lactobacillus spp.d37 < 0.03–32.01628
    Peptostreptococcus spp.140.125–1128
    Propionibacterium spp.150.125–2228
a

Includes methicillin-resistant isolates vancomycin-resistant isolates.

b

European isolates were S. agalactiae only.

c

Includes vancomycin-resistant isolates.

d

All Lactobacillus spp. were grown anaerobically.

Table 1.

In vitro activity of daptomycin against select Gram-positive bacteria

OrganismNo. of strainsMIC range (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)Reference
Select aerobic pathogens
    Staphylococcus aureus
        oxacillin-resistant
         European isolates3340.12–10.514
         worldwide isolates1247 ≤ 0.12–10.521
        oxacillin-susceptible
         European isolates888 ≤ 0.015–10.514
         worldwide isolates1955 ≤ 0.12–20.521
    Coagulase-negative staphylococcia
        European isolates10400.03–10.514
        worldwide isolates838 ≤ 0.12–20.521
    β-Haemolytic streptococci
        European isolatesb3670.06–10.2514
        worldwide isolates247 ≤ 0.12–0.50.2521
    Enterococcus faecalis
        vancomycin-susceptible
         European isolates1789 ≤ 0.015–4214
         worldwide isolates626 ≤ 0.12–4121
        vancomycin-resistant
         European isolates40 ≤ 0.5–4214
         worldwide isolates200.25–1121
    Enterococcus faecium
        vancomycin-susceptible
         European isolates3330.03–8414
         worldwide isolates97 ≤ 0.12–8421
        vancomycin-resistant
         European isolates1140.25–4414
         worldwide isolates550.25–4421
    Enterococcus spp.c
        European isolates160 ≤ 0.015–4414
        worldwide isolates210.5–4221
    Corynebacterium jeikeium100.125–0.50.2528
Select anaerobic pathogens
    Actinomyces group220.06–16.0428
    Bifidobacterium spp.13 < 0.03–1.00.528
    Clostridium difficile180.125–1.0128
    Clostridium perfringens110.06–0.50.528
    Lactobacillus spp.d37 < 0.03–32.01628
    Peptostreptococcus spp.140.125–1128
    Propionibacterium spp.150.125–2228
OrganismNo. of strainsMIC range (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)Reference
Select aerobic pathogens
    Staphylococcus aureus
        oxacillin-resistant
         European isolates3340.12–10.514
         worldwide isolates1247 ≤ 0.12–10.521
        oxacillin-susceptible
         European isolates888 ≤ 0.015–10.514
         worldwide isolates1955 ≤ 0.12–20.521
    Coagulase-negative staphylococcia
        European isolates10400.03–10.514
        worldwide isolates838 ≤ 0.12–20.521
    β-Haemolytic streptococci
        European isolatesb3670.06–10.2514
        worldwide isolates247 ≤ 0.12–0.50.2521
    Enterococcus faecalis
        vancomycin-susceptible
         European isolates1789 ≤ 0.015–4214
         worldwide isolates626 ≤ 0.12–4121
        vancomycin-resistant
         European isolates40 ≤ 0.5–4214
         worldwide isolates200.25–1121
    Enterococcus faecium
        vancomycin-susceptible
         European isolates3330.03–8414
         worldwide isolates97 ≤ 0.12–8421
        vancomycin-resistant
         European isolates1140.25–4414
         worldwide isolates550.25–4421
    Enterococcus spp.c
        European isolates160 ≤ 0.015–4414
        worldwide isolates210.5–4221
    Corynebacterium jeikeium100.125–0.50.2528
Select anaerobic pathogens
    Actinomyces group220.06–16.0428
    Bifidobacterium spp.13 < 0.03–1.00.528
    Clostridium difficile180.125–1.0128
    Clostridium perfringens110.06–0.50.528
    Lactobacillus spp.d37 < 0.03–32.01628
    Peptostreptococcus spp.140.125–1128
    Propionibacterium spp.150.125–2228
a

Includes methicillin-resistant isolates vancomycin-resistant isolates.

b

European isolates were S. agalactiae only.

c

Includes vancomycin-resistant isolates.

d

All Lactobacillus spp. were grown anaerobically.

Table 2.

Mean (s.d.) daptomycin pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy volunteers on day 7

Dose (mg/kg)Cmax (mg/L)Tmaxa (h)AUC0–24 (mg·h/L)t1/2 (h)V (L/kg)CLT (mL/h/kg)CLR (mL/h/kg)Ae24 (%)
4 (n=6)57.8 (3.0)0.8 (0.5, 1.0)494 (75)8.1 (1.0)0.096 (0.009)8.3 (1.3)4.8 (1.3)53.0 (10.8)
6 (n=6)98.6 (12)0.5 (0.5,1.0)747 (91)8.9 (1.3)0.104 (0.013)8.1 (1.0)4.4 (0.3)47.4 (11.5)
8 (n=6)133 (13.5)0.5 (0.5,1.0)1130 (117)9.0 (1.2)0.092 (0.012)7.2 (0.8)3.7 (0.5)52.1 (5.19)
Dose (mg/kg)Cmax (mg/L)Tmaxa (h)AUC0–24 (mg·h/L)t1/2 (h)V (L/kg)CLT (mL/h/kg)CLR (mL/h/kg)Ae24 (%)
4 (n=6)57.8 (3.0)0.8 (0.5, 1.0)494 (75)8.1 (1.0)0.096 (0.009)8.3 (1.3)4.8 (1.3)53.0 (10.8)
6 (n=6)98.6 (12)0.5 (0.5,1.0)747 (91)8.9 (1.3)0.104 (0.013)8.1 (1.0)4.4 (0.3)47.4 (11.5)
8 (n=6)133 (13.5)0.5 (0.5,1.0)1130 (117)9.0 (1.2)0.092 (0.012)7.2 (0.8)3.7 (0.5)52.1 (5.19)

Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; Tmax, time to Cmax; AUC0–24, area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h; t1/2, terminal elimination half-life; V, apparent volume of distribution; CLT, systemic clearance; CLR, renal clearance; Ae24, percentage of dose recovered in urine over 24 h as unchanged daptomycin following the first dose.

a

Median (minimum, maximum).

Table 2.

Mean (s.d.) daptomycin pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy volunteers on day 7

Dose (mg/kg)Cmax (mg/L)Tmaxa (h)AUC0–24 (mg·h/L)t1/2 (h)V (L/kg)CLT (mL/h/kg)CLR (mL/h/kg)Ae24 (%)
4 (n=6)57.8 (3.0)0.8 (0.5, 1.0)494 (75)8.1 (1.0)0.096 (0.009)8.3 (1.3)4.8 (1.3)53.0 (10.8)
6 (n=6)98.6 (12)0.5 (0.5,1.0)747 (91)8.9 (1.3)0.104 (0.013)8.1 (1.0)4.4 (0.3)47.4 (11.5)
8 (n=6)133 (13.5)0.5 (0.5,1.0)1130 (117)9.0 (1.2)0.092 (0.012)7.2 (0.8)3.7 (0.5)52.1 (5.19)
Dose (mg/kg)Cmax (mg/L)Tmaxa (h)AUC0–24 (mg·h/L)t1/2 (h)V (L/kg)CLT (mL/h/kg)CLR (mL/h/kg)Ae24 (%)
4 (n=6)57.8 (3.0)0.8 (0.5, 1.0)494 (75)8.1 (1.0)0.096 (0.009)8.3 (1.3)4.8 (1.3)53.0 (10.8)
6 (n=6)98.6 (12)0.5 (0.5,1.0)747 (91)8.9 (1.3)0.104 (0.013)8.1 (1.0)4.4 (0.3)47.4 (11.5)
8 (n=6)133 (13.5)0.5 (0.5,1.0)1130 (117)9.0 (1.2)0.092 (0.012)7.2 (0.8)3.7 (0.5)52.1 (5.19)

Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; Tmax, time to Cmax; AUC0–24, area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h; t1/2, terminal elimination half-life; V, apparent volume of distribution; CLT, systemic clearance; CLR, renal clearance; Ae24, percentage of dose recovered in urine over 24 h as unchanged daptomycin following the first dose.

a

Median (minimum, maximum).

Table 3.

Daptomycin tissue penetration

TissueSpeciesMaximum concentrationPercent relative to serumReference
Blister fluidhuman27.6 mg/L68.442
Blood clot–tissuerat, rabbit3.5 μg/g72.743
Peritoneal tissue chamberrat11.8 mg/L35.144
Lungmouse, rat5 mg/L9.345
BAL-ELFmouse, rat, sheep1 mg/L245
CSFrabbit5.2 mg/L5.9733
TissueSpeciesMaximum concentrationPercent relative to serumReference
Blister fluidhuman27.6 mg/L68.442
Blood clot–tissuerat, rabbit3.5 μg/g72.743
Peritoneal tissue chamberrat11.8 mg/L35.144
Lungmouse, rat5 mg/L9.345
BAL-ELFmouse, rat, sheep1 mg/L245
CSFrabbit5.2 mg/L5.9733

BAL-ELF, bronchoalveolar lavage epithelial lining fluid.

Table 3.

Daptomycin tissue penetration

TissueSpeciesMaximum concentrationPercent relative to serumReference
Blister fluidhuman27.6 mg/L68.442
Blood clot–tissuerat, rabbit3.5 μg/g72.743
Peritoneal tissue chamberrat11.8 mg/L35.144
Lungmouse, rat5 mg/L9.345
BAL-ELFmouse, rat, sheep1 mg/L245
CSFrabbit5.2 mg/L5.9733
TissueSpeciesMaximum concentrationPercent relative to serumReference
Blister fluidhuman27.6 mg/L68.442
Blood clot–tissuerat, rabbit3.5 μg/g72.743
Peritoneal tissue chamberrat11.8 mg/L35.144
Lungmouse, rat5 mg/L9.345
BAL-ELFmouse, rat, sheep1 mg/L245
CSFrabbit5.2 mg/L5.9733

BAL-ELF, bronchoalveolar lavage epithelial lining fluid.

Table 4.

Incidence of adverse events that occurred in ≥ 2% of patients in either daptomycin or comparator treatment groups in Phase III cSSSI studies

Adverse eventDaptomycin %(n=534)Comparatora % (n=558)
Gastrointestinal disorders
    constipation6.26.8
    nausea5.89.5
    diarrhoea5.24.3
    vomiting3.23.8
    dyspepsia0.92.5
General disorders
    injection site reactions5.87.7
    fever1.92.5
Nervous system disorders
    headache5.45.4
    insomnia4.55.4
    dizziness2.22.0
Skin/subcutaneous disorders
    rash4.33.8
    pruritus2.83.8
Diagnostic investigations
    abnormal liver function tests3.01.6
    elevated CPK2.81.8
Infections
    fungal infections2.63.2
    urinary tract infections2.40.5
Vascular disorders
    hypotension2.41.4
    hypertension1.12.0
Renal/urinary disorders
    renal failure2.22.7
Blood/lymphatic disorders
    anaemia2.12.3
Respiratory disorders
    dyspnoea2.11.6
Musculoskeletal disorders
    limb pain1.52.0
    arthralgia0.92.2
Adverse eventDaptomycin %(n=534)Comparatora % (n=558)
Gastrointestinal disorders
    constipation6.26.8
    nausea5.89.5
    diarrhoea5.24.3
    vomiting3.23.8
    dyspepsia0.92.5
General disorders
    injection site reactions5.87.7
    fever1.92.5
Nervous system disorders
    headache5.45.4
    insomnia4.55.4
    dizziness2.22.0
Skin/subcutaneous disorders
    rash4.33.8
    pruritus2.83.8
Diagnostic investigations
    abnormal liver function tests3.01.6
    elevated CPK2.81.8
Infections
    fungal infections2.63.2
    urinary tract infections2.40.5
Vascular disorders
    hypotension2.41.4
    hypertension1.12.0
Renal/urinary disorders
    renal failure2.22.7
Blood/lymphatic disorders
    anaemia2.12.3
Respiratory disorders
    dyspnoea2.11.6
Musculoskeletal disorders
    limb pain1.52.0
    arthralgia0.92.2
a

Comparators included vancomycin (1 g iv every 12 h) and antistaphylococcal penicillins (i.e. nafcillin, oxacillin, cloxacillin, flucloxacillin; 4–12 g/day in divided doses).

Table 4.

Incidence of adverse events that occurred in ≥ 2% of patients in either daptomycin or comparator treatment groups in Phase III cSSSI studies

Adverse eventDaptomycin %(n=534)Comparatora % (n=558)
Gastrointestinal disorders
    constipation6.26.8
    nausea5.89.5
    diarrhoea5.24.3
    vomiting3.23.8
    dyspepsia0.92.5
General disorders
    injection site reactions5.87.7
    fever1.92.5
Nervous system disorders
    headache5.45.4
    insomnia4.55.4
    dizziness2.22.0
Skin/subcutaneous disorders
    rash4.33.8
    pruritus2.83.8
Diagnostic investigations
    abnormal liver function tests3.01.6
    elevated CPK2.81.8
Infections
    fungal infections2.63.2
    urinary tract infections2.40.5
Vascular disorders
    hypotension2.41.4
    hypertension1.12.0
Renal/urinary disorders
    renal failure2.22.7
Blood/lymphatic disorders
    anaemia2.12.3
Respiratory disorders
    dyspnoea2.11.6
Musculoskeletal disorders
    limb pain1.52.0
    arthralgia0.92.2
Adverse eventDaptomycin %(n=534)Comparatora % (n=558)
Gastrointestinal disorders
    constipation6.26.8
    nausea5.89.5
    diarrhoea5.24.3
    vomiting3.23.8
    dyspepsia0.92.5
General disorders
    injection site reactions5.87.7
    fever1.92.5
Nervous system disorders
    headache5.45.4
    insomnia4.55.4
    dizziness2.22.0
Skin/subcutaneous disorders
    rash4.33.8
    pruritus2.83.8
Diagnostic investigations
    abnormal liver function tests3.01.6
    elevated CPK2.81.8
Infections
    fungal infections2.63.2
    urinary tract infections2.40.5
Vascular disorders
    hypotension2.41.4
    hypertension1.12.0
Renal/urinary disorders
    renal failure2.22.7
Blood/lymphatic disorders
    anaemia2.12.3
Respiratory disorders
    dyspnoea2.11.6
Musculoskeletal disorders
    limb pain1.52.0
    arthralgia0.92.2
a

Comparators included vancomycin (1 g iv every 12 h) and antistaphylococcal penicillins (i.e. nafcillin, oxacillin, cloxacillin, flucloxacillin; 4–12 g/day in divided doses).

Table 5.

Clinical success rates by treatment group, in Phase III cSSSI studies

Daptomycin
Comparatora
Populationn% successn% success95% CIb
Intent-to-treat53471.555871.1(–5.8, 5.0)
Modified intent-to-treat42874.547174.7(–5.5, 5.9)
Clinically evaluable44683.445684.2(–4.0, 5.6)
Microbiologically evaluable36584.739685.9(–3.8, 6.3)
Daptomycin
Comparatora
Populationn% successn% success95% CIb
Intent-to-treat53471.555871.1(–5.8, 5.0)
Modified intent-to-treat42874.547174.7(–5.5, 5.9)
Clinically evaluable44683.445684.2(–4.0, 5.6)
Microbiologically evaluable36584.739685.9(–3.8, 6.3)
a

Cloxacillin, flucloxacillin, nafcillin, oxacillin or vancomycin.

b

95% confidence interval around the difference in success rate (comparator—daptomycin).

Table 5.

Clinical success rates by treatment group, in Phase III cSSSI studies

Daptomycin
Comparatora
Populationn% successn% success95% CIb
Intent-to-treat53471.555871.1(–5.8, 5.0)
Modified intent-to-treat42874.547174.7(–5.5, 5.9)
Clinically evaluable44683.445684.2(–4.0, 5.6)
Microbiologically evaluable36584.739685.9(–3.8, 6.3)
Daptomycin
Comparatora
Populationn% successn% success95% CIb
Intent-to-treat53471.555871.1(–5.8, 5.0)
Modified intent-to-treat42874.547174.7(–5.5, 5.9)
Clinically evaluable44683.445684.2(–4.0, 5.6)
Microbiologically evaluable36584.739685.9(–3.8, 6.3)
a

Cloxacillin, flucloxacillin, nafcillin, oxacillin or vancomycin.

b

95% confidence interval around the difference in success rate (comparator—daptomycin).

Table 6.

Clinical success rates by infecting pathogen, in Phase III cSSSI studies

Success rate, n/N (%)
PathogenDaptomycincomparatora
Methicillin-susceptible  Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)b170/198 (85.9)180/207 (87.0)
Methicillin-resistant  Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)b21/28 (75.0)25/36 (69.4)
Streptococcus pyogenes79/84 (94.0)80/88 (90.9)
Streptococcus agalactiae23/27 (85.2)22/29 (75.9)
Streptococcus dysgalactiae  subsp. equisimilis8/8 (100)9/11 (81.8)
Enterococcus faecalis  (vancomycin-susceptible only)b27/37 (73.0)40/53 (75.5)
Success rate, n/N (%)
PathogenDaptomycincomparatora
Methicillin-susceptible  Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)b170/198 (85.9)180/207 (87.0)
Methicillin-resistant  Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)b21/28 (75.0)25/36 (69.4)
Streptococcus pyogenes79/84 (94.0)80/88 (90.9)
Streptococcus agalactiae23/27 (85.2)22/29 (75.9)
Streptococcus dysgalactiae  subsp. equisimilis8/8 (100)9/11 (81.8)
Enterococcus faecalis  (vancomycin-susceptible only)b27/37 (73.0)40/53 (75.5)
a

Vancomycin or semi-synthetic penicillins (e.g. nafcillin, oxacillin, cloxacillin or flucloxacillin).

b

As determined by the central laboratory.

Table 6.

Clinical success rates by infecting pathogen, in Phase III cSSSI studies

Success rate, n/N (%)
PathogenDaptomycincomparatora
Methicillin-susceptible  Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)b170/198 (85.9)180/207 (87.0)
Methicillin-resistant  Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)b21/28 (75.0)25/36 (69.4)
Streptococcus pyogenes79/84 (94.0)80/88 (90.9)
Streptococcus agalactiae23/27 (85.2)22/29 (75.9)
Streptococcus dysgalactiae  subsp. equisimilis8/8 (100)9/11 (81.8)
Enterococcus faecalis  (vancomycin-susceptible only)b27/37 (73.0)40/53 (75.5)
Success rate, n/N (%)
PathogenDaptomycincomparatora
Methicillin-susceptible  Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)b170/198 (85.9)180/207 (87.0)
Methicillin-resistant  Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)b21/28 (75.0)25/36 (69.4)
Streptococcus pyogenes79/84 (94.0)80/88 (90.9)
Streptococcus agalactiae23/27 (85.2)22/29 (75.9)
Streptococcus dysgalactiae  subsp. equisimilis8/8 (100)9/11 (81.8)
Enterococcus faecalis  (vancomycin-susceptible only)b27/37 (73.0)40/53 (75.5)
a

Vancomycin or semi-synthetic penicillins (e.g. nafcillin, oxacillin, cloxacillin or flucloxacillin).

b

As determined by the central laboratory.

References

1.

Bell, J. M. & Turnidge, J. D. (

2002
). High prevalence of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hospitalized patients in Asia-Pacific and South Africa: results from SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 1998–1999.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
46
,
879
–81.

2.

Stefani, S. & Varaldo, P. E. (

2003
). Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in Europe.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
9
,
1179
–86.

3.

Fluit, A. C., Wielders, C. L., Verhoef, J. et al. (

2001
). Epidemiology and susceptibility of 3,051 Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 25 university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY study.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
39
,
3727
–32.

4.

Cui, L., Ma, X., Sato, K. et al. (

2003
). Cell wall thickening is a common feature of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
41
,
5
–14.

5.

Verdier, I., Reverdy, M. E., Etienne, J. et al. (

2004
). Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides belong to accessory gene regulator group I or II.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
48
,
1024
–7.

6.

Sakoulas, G., Eliopoulos, G. M., Moellering, R. C. et al. (

2003
). Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) group II: is there a relationship to the development of intermediate-level glycopeptide resistance?
Journal of Infectious Diseases
187
,
929
–38.

7.

Adhikari, R. P., Scales, G. C., Kobayashi, K. et al. (

2004
). Vancomycin-induced deletion of the methicillin resistance gene mecA in Staphylococcus aureus.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
54
,
360
–3.

8.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (

2002
). Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin—United States, 2002. In Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, pp.
565
–7.

9.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (

2002
). Public Health Dispatch: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—Pennsylvania, 2002.
In Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
902
.

10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (

2004
). Brief report: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—New York, 2004. In
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
322
.

11.

Mutnick, A. H., Biedenbach, D. J. & Jones, R. N. (

2003
). Geographic variations and trends in antimicrobial resistance among Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–2000).
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
46
,
63
–8.

12.

Kacica, M. A., Scott, C., Johnson, G. et al. (

2004
). Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) in a resident of a long-term care facility (LTCF). In Program and Abstracts of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Boston, MA, USA. Abstract 530, p. 143. Infectious Diseases Society of America, Alexandria, VA, USA.

13.

Barry, A. L., Fuchs, P. C. & Brown, S. D. (

2001
). In vitro activities of daptomycin against 2,789 clinical isolates from 11 North American medical centers.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
45
,
1919
–22.

14.

Critchley, I. A., Draghi, D. C., Sahm, D. F. et al. (

2003
). Activity of daptomycin against susceptible and multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens collected in the SECURE study (Europe) during 2000–2001.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
51
,
639
–49.

15.

Fluit, A. C., Schmitz, F. J., Verhoef, J. et al. (

2004
). Daptomycin in vitro susceptibility in European Gram-positive clinical isolates.
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
24
,
59
–66.

16.

Fluit, A. C., Schmitz, F. J., Verhoef, J. et al. (

2004
). In vitro activity of daptomycin against Gram-positive European clinical isolates with defined resistance determinants.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
48
,
1007
–11.

17.

Petersen, P. J., Bradford, P. A., Weiss, W. J. et al. (

2002
). In vitro and in vivo activities of tigecycline (GAR-936), daptomycin, and comparative antimicrobial agents against glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and other resistant gram-positive pathogens.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
46
,
2595
–601.

18.

Richter, S. S., Kealey, D. E., Murray, C. T. et al. (

2003
). The in vitro activity of daptomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
52
,
123
–7.

19.

Rybak, M. J., Hershberger, E., Moldovan, T. et al. (

2000
). In vitro activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin–dalfopristin against staphylococci and enterococci, including vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant strains.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
44
,
1062
–6.

20.

Snydman, D. R., Jacobus, N. V., McDermott, L. A. et al. (

2000
). Comparative in vitro activities of daptomycin and vancomycin against resistant Gram-positive pathogens.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
44
,
3447
–50.

21.

Streit, J. M., Jones, R. N. & Sader, H. S. (

2004
). Daptomycin activity and spectrum: a worldwide sample of 6737 clinical Gram-positive organisms.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
53
,
669
–74.

22.

Silverman, J. A., Perlmutter, N. G. & Shapiro, H. M. (

2003
). Correlation of daptomycin bactericidal activity and membrane depolarization in Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
47
,
2538
–44.

23.

Canepari, P., Boaretti, M., del Mar Lleo, M. et al. (

1990
). Lipoteichoic acid as a new target for activity of antibiotics: mode of action of daptomycin (LY146032).
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
34
,
1220
–6.

24.

Silverman, J., Harris, B., Cotroneo, N., et al. (

2003
). Daptomycin (DAP) treatment induces membrane and cell wall alterations in Staphylococcus aureus. In Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL. Abstract C1–2135, p. 103. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA.

25.

Cha, R. & Rybak, M. J. (

2004
). Influence of protein binding under controlled conditions on the bactericidal activity of daptomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
54
,
259
–62.

26.

Fuchs, P. C., Barry, A. L. & Brown, S. D. (

2002
). In vitro bactericidal activity of daptomycin against staphylococci.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
49
,
467
–70.

27.

Tedesco, K. L. & Rybak, M. J. (

2003
). Impact of high inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the activities of nafcillin (NAF), vancomycin (VAN), linezolid (LZD), gentamicin (GEN), and daptomycin (DAP) in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model (IVD). In Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL. Abstract A-1151, p. 14. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA.

28.

Goldstein, E. J., Citron, D. M., Merriam, C. V. et al. (

2003
). In vitro activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, quinupristin–dalfopristin, linezolid, and five other antimicrobials against 307 gram-positive anaerobic and 31 Corynebacterium clinical isolates.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
47
,
337
–41.

29.

Rand, K. H. & Houck, H. (

2004
). Daptomycin synergy with rifampicin and ampicillin against vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
53
,
530
–2.

30.

Silverman, J. A., Oliver, N., Andrew, T. et al. (

2001
). Resistance studies with daptomycin.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
45
,
1799
–802.

31.

Oleson, F. B., Jr, Berman, C. L., Kirkpatrick, J. B. et al. (

2000
). Once-daily dosing in dogs optimizes daptomycin safety.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
44
,
2948
–53.

32.

Safdar, N., Andes, D. & Craig, W. A. (

2004
). In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of daptomycin.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
48
,
63
–8.

33.

Cottagnoud, P., Pfister, M., Acosta, F. et al. (

2004
). Daptomycin is highly efficacious against penicillin-resistant and penicillin- and quinolone-resistant pneumococci in experimental meningitis.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
48
,
3928
–33.

34.

Arbeit, R. D., Maki, D., Tally, F. P. et al. (

2004
). The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections.
Clinical Infectious Diseases
38
,
1673
–81.

35.

Alder, J., Li, T., Yu, D. et al. (

2003
). Analysis of daptomycin efficacy and breakpoint standards in a murine model of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium renal infection.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
47
,
3561
–6.

36.

Cha, R., Grucz, R. G., Jr & Rybak, M. J. (

2003
). Daptomycin dose–effect relationship against resistant gram-positive organisms.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
47
,
1598
–603.

37.

Dandekar, P. K., Tessier, P. R., Williams, P. et al. (

2003
). Pharmacodynamic profile of daptomycin against Enterococcus species and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a murine thigh infection model.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
52
,
405
–11.

38.

Kaatz, G. W., Seo, S. M., Reddy, V. N. et al. (

1990
). Daptomycin compared with teicoplanin and vancomycin for therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
34
,
2081
–5.

39.

Louie, A., Kaw, P., Liu, W. et al. (

2001
). Pharmacodynamics of daptomycin in a murine thigh model of Staphylococcus aureus infection.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
45
,
845
–51.

40.

Mader, J. T. & Adams, K. (

1989
). Comparative evaluation of daptomycin (LY146032) and vancomycin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
33
,
689
–92.

41.

Smith, K., Cobbs, G., Dill, R. et al. (

1990
). Daptomycin versus vancomycin treatment for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a murine model.
Chemotherapy
36
,
428
–34.

42.

Wise, R., Gee, T., Andrews, J. M. et al. (

2002
). Pharmacokinetics and inflammatory fluid penetration of intravenous daptomycin in volunteers.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
46
,
31
–3.

43.

Michiels, M. J. & Bergeron, M. G. (

1996
). Differential increased survival of staphylococci and limited ultrastructural changes in the core of infected fibrin clots after daptomycin administration.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
40
,
203
–11.

44.

Vaudaux, P., Francois, P., Bisognano, C. et al. (

2003
). Comparative efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the therapy of experimental foreign body infection due to Staphylococcus aureus.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
52
,
89
–95.

45.

Alder, J., Arbeit, R., Eisenstein, B., et al. (

2004
). Pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) as a privileged site: daptomycin in pulmonary infections. In International Congress of Infectious Diseases, Cancun, Mexico. 11th ICID Abstracts, Abstract 60.005, p. S195. International Society for Infectious Diseases, Brighton, UK.