Abstract

Our aim was to prospectively examine the association of psychosocial factors with adverse outcome after cardiac surgery. One hundred and eighty cardiac surgery patients were enrolled and contacted annually by mail. Depression [Beck depression inventory (BDI)], anxiety [state anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) and trait anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T)] were investigated annually, social support, negative affectivity, social inhibition (SI), illness intrusiveness, self-rated health and sleeping disorders were investigated by standardized tests at the second and fifth year. The end-point was the major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) including death. Twenty-eight (15.5%) patients died by the end of the fifth year. At the end of the second and fifth years, 146 (81.1%) and 118 (65.5%) patients fulfilled the tests, respectively. At the end of the second year after adjustment for medical and perioperative factors worse self-rated health [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 0.67, P=0.006], sleeping disorders (AHR: 1.14, P=0.001), higher illness intrusiveness (AHR: 1.03, P=0.018), higher BDI (AHR: 1.12, P=0.001), STAI-S (AHR: 1.09, P=0.001) and higher STAI-T scores (AHR: 1.08, P=0.002) showed higher risk for MACCE. Significant individual elevation in scores of sleeping disorders, illness intrusiveness and SI were observed over the three-year period in the MACCE group. Assessment of psychosocial factors could help in identifying patients at high-risk for MACCE after cardiac surgery.

1. Introduction

Over the last three decades, researchers have recognized the unique impact of psychosocial factors, such as anxiety, depression, social support, and self-rated health on the recovery from medical procedures regarding coronary heart disease [1]. Psychiatric co-morbidity increases the risk of adverse outcomes in myocardial infarction (MI), such as worse prognosis, high medical costs, and higher mortality rate [2].

The majority of prior investigations have focused on predictors of in-hospital morbidity and complications. Since mortality has become relatively low after cardiac surgery, the effectiveness of the operation has been assessed by the measurement of patients' well-being and quality of life [2]. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of psychological factors beyond clinical risk factors and perioperative characteristics on the five-year occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) and death.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study population

The study population comprised of 197 patients admitted for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve surgery at the Gottsegen Hungarian Institute of Cardiology, between July 2000 and May 2001. There was no eligibility restriction in terms of age, gender, or cardiac condition and no classification of on- and off-pump procedures. All patients signed the informed consent. The participants were not managed differently than the other patients, e.g. there was no psychosocial preparation, it was an observative study.

The baseline questionnaires were completed one to five days before surgery. Of the 197, 17 patients were excluded because of cancelled surgery (n=9) or inability to complete the psychological tests (n=8). Thus, a total of 180 patients were prospectively studied. The study was approved by the Institutional Medical Ethics Committee on human research.

2.2. Clinical factors

A range of medical and psychosocial factors were assessed as potential determinants of outcome, see statistical analysis section. Detailed definitions can be accessed at the homepage of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons 1

STS National Database, data collection STS Adult Cardiac Database v2.52.1. Available at: http://www.sts.org/sections/stsnationaldatabase/datamanagers/adultcardiacdb/datacollection/index.html Accessed March 22, 2009.

The additive EuroSCORE was also calculated [3]. Intraoperative characteristics included a number of grafted vessels, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and aortic cross-clamp time. Postoperative complications were defined by key outcomes of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database [4]. The diagnosis of acute heart failure required the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, the use of continuous intravenous inotropic support for at least 48 hours, or autopsy evidence of heart failure. Duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay was also analyzed.

2.3. Psychosocial factors

Demographic data on age, gender, living status (alone vs. with another), and education (number of school-years) were collected. Description of the psychosocial tests is presented in Table 1 .

Table 1

Applied psychosocial tests and Cronbach alfa for study population

Psychosocial testCronbach alfaDescription, psychometric properties and references
Self-rated health (one question)Question: ‘How do you rate your health in general?’ There were five
possible responses: very good, good, fair, poor and very poor [5].
The Athens insomnia scale (AIS)0.74It assessed sleep complaints and identified possible cases of insomnia.
The scale consisted of eight items. The first five items cover nighttime
symptoms, and three items asked for daytime consequences of disturbed
sleep [6].
Negative affectivity (NA) andNA: 0.89,NA refers to the tendency to experience negative emotions across
social inhibition (SI)SI: 0.78time/situations. SI refers to the tendency to inhibit the expression of
emotions/behaviors in social interactions to avoid disapproval by
others. Type D patients (defined as both NA and SI scores equal or
higher than 10 points) are at increased risk for a wide range of adverse
health outcomes (e.g. cardiac death, risk of early ischemic coronary
heart disease in men etc.) [7].
Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety0.94The STAI-S measures the transitional emotional status evoked by a
Inventory state and trait scoresstressful situation, such as surgery. The STAI-T score reflects
(STAI-S and STAI-T)relatively enduring individual differences in proneness to anxiety. In the
American population, patients with scores higher than 40 are classified
as anxious [8].
Beck depression inventory (BDI)0.88The BDI is a 21-item self-report instrument measuring clinical
manifestations of depressive symptoms that correspond to the DSM-IV
criteria. Scores 0–9 indicate that a person is not depressed, 10–18
indicate mild–moderate depression, 19–29 indicate moderate–severe
depression and 30–63 indicate severe depression [1].
Social support inventory (SSI)Board: 0.78,Five-item scale measures social and emotional support in cardiac
Family: 0.66patients. The score ranged from 0 (no social support) to 22 (maximum
level of social support) [9].
Illness intrusiveness rating scale0.91Self-report instrument that measures the extent to which one's illness
and/or its treatment interfere with 13 life domains. Each item is rated
from 1 (not very much) to 7 (very much). Higher scores reflect greater
illness intrusion [10].
Psychosocial testCronbach alfaDescription, psychometric properties and references
Self-rated health (one question)Question: ‘How do you rate your health in general?’ There were five
possible responses: very good, good, fair, poor and very poor [5].
The Athens insomnia scale (AIS)0.74It assessed sleep complaints and identified possible cases of insomnia.
The scale consisted of eight items. The first five items cover nighttime
symptoms, and three items asked for daytime consequences of disturbed
sleep [6].
Negative affectivity (NA) andNA: 0.89,NA refers to the tendency to experience negative emotions across
social inhibition (SI)SI: 0.78time/situations. SI refers to the tendency to inhibit the expression of
emotions/behaviors in social interactions to avoid disapproval by
others. Type D patients (defined as both NA and SI scores equal or
higher than 10 points) are at increased risk for a wide range of adverse
health outcomes (e.g. cardiac death, risk of early ischemic coronary
heart disease in men etc.) [7].
Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety0.94The STAI-S measures the transitional emotional status evoked by a
Inventory state and trait scoresstressful situation, such as surgery. The STAI-T score reflects
(STAI-S and STAI-T)relatively enduring individual differences in proneness to anxiety. In the
American population, patients with scores higher than 40 are classified
as anxious [8].
Beck depression inventory (BDI)0.88The BDI is a 21-item self-report instrument measuring clinical
manifestations of depressive symptoms that correspond to the DSM-IV
criteria. Scores 0–9 indicate that a person is not depressed, 10–18
indicate mild–moderate depression, 19–29 indicate moderate–severe
depression and 30–63 indicate severe depression [1].
Social support inventory (SSI)Board: 0.78,Five-item scale measures social and emotional support in cardiac
Family: 0.66patients. The score ranged from 0 (no social support) to 22 (maximum
level of social support) [9].
Illness intrusiveness rating scale0.91Self-report instrument that measures the extent to which one's illness
and/or its treatment interfere with 13 life domains. Each item is rated
from 1 (not very much) to 7 (very much). Higher scores reflect greater
illness intrusion [10].

The validity and reliability of the tests above are well-documented in the Hungarian population. The Cronbach alfa was calculated for the investigated population.

Table 1

Applied psychosocial tests and Cronbach alfa for study population

Psychosocial testCronbach alfaDescription, psychometric properties and references
Self-rated health (one question)Question: ‘How do you rate your health in general?’ There were five
possible responses: very good, good, fair, poor and very poor [5].
The Athens insomnia scale (AIS)0.74It assessed sleep complaints and identified possible cases of insomnia.
The scale consisted of eight items. The first five items cover nighttime
symptoms, and three items asked for daytime consequences of disturbed
sleep [6].
Negative affectivity (NA) andNA: 0.89,NA refers to the tendency to experience negative emotions across
social inhibition (SI)SI: 0.78time/situations. SI refers to the tendency to inhibit the expression of
emotions/behaviors in social interactions to avoid disapproval by
others. Type D patients (defined as both NA and SI scores equal or
higher than 10 points) are at increased risk for a wide range of adverse
health outcomes (e.g. cardiac death, risk of early ischemic coronary
heart disease in men etc.) [7].
Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety0.94The STAI-S measures the transitional emotional status evoked by a
Inventory state and trait scoresstressful situation, such as surgery. The STAI-T score reflects
(STAI-S and STAI-T)relatively enduring individual differences in proneness to anxiety. In the
American population, patients with scores higher than 40 are classified
as anxious [8].
Beck depression inventory (BDI)0.88The BDI is a 21-item self-report instrument measuring clinical
manifestations of depressive symptoms that correspond to the DSM-IV
criteria. Scores 0–9 indicate that a person is not depressed, 10–18
indicate mild–moderate depression, 19–29 indicate moderate–severe
depression and 30–63 indicate severe depression [1].
Social support inventory (SSI)Board: 0.78,Five-item scale measures social and emotional support in cardiac
Family: 0.66patients. The score ranged from 0 (no social support) to 22 (maximum
level of social support) [9].
Illness intrusiveness rating scale0.91Self-report instrument that measures the extent to which one's illness
and/or its treatment interfere with 13 life domains. Each item is rated
from 1 (not very much) to 7 (very much). Higher scores reflect greater
illness intrusion [10].
Psychosocial testCronbach alfaDescription, psychometric properties and references
Self-rated health (one question)Question: ‘How do you rate your health in general?’ There were five
possible responses: very good, good, fair, poor and very poor [5].
The Athens insomnia scale (AIS)0.74It assessed sleep complaints and identified possible cases of insomnia.
The scale consisted of eight items. The first five items cover nighttime
symptoms, and three items asked for daytime consequences of disturbed
sleep [6].
Negative affectivity (NA) andNA: 0.89,NA refers to the tendency to experience negative emotions across
social inhibition (SI)SI: 0.78time/situations. SI refers to the tendency to inhibit the expression of
emotions/behaviors in social interactions to avoid disapproval by
others. Type D patients (defined as both NA and SI scores equal or
higher than 10 points) are at increased risk for a wide range of adverse
health outcomes (e.g. cardiac death, risk of early ischemic coronary
heart disease in men etc.) [7].
Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety0.94The STAI-S measures the transitional emotional status evoked by a
Inventory state and trait scoresstressful situation, such as surgery. The STAI-T score reflects
(STAI-S and STAI-T)relatively enduring individual differences in proneness to anxiety. In the
American population, patients with scores higher than 40 are classified
as anxious [8].
Beck depression inventory (BDI)0.88The BDI is a 21-item self-report instrument measuring clinical
manifestations of depressive symptoms that correspond to the DSM-IV
criteria. Scores 0–9 indicate that a person is not depressed, 10–18
indicate mild–moderate depression, 19–29 indicate moderate–severe
depression and 30–63 indicate severe depression [1].
Social support inventory (SSI)Board: 0.78,Five-item scale measures social and emotional support in cardiac
Family: 0.66patients. The score ranged from 0 (no social support) to 22 (maximum
level of social support) [9].
Illness intrusiveness rating scale0.91Self-report instrument that measures the extent to which one's illness
and/or its treatment interfere with 13 life domains. Each item is rated
from 1 (not very much) to 7 (very much). Higher scores reflect greater
illness intrusion [10].

The validity and reliability of the tests above are well-documented in the Hungarian population. The Cronbach alfa was calculated for the investigated population.

2.4. Follow-up surveillance

The Beck depression inventory (BDI), state anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), and trait anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) tests were sent to the patients, along with an additional sheet of questions regarding hospitalisation and the primary cause of their hospital admission since the last contact. The patients were contacted by mail 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after discharge. The social support, negative affectivity (NA), social inhibition (SI), illness intrusiveness, and insomnia tests were sent with the second and fifth year questionnaires. At the end of the second and fifth year, we telephoned those patients who did not respond and asked for information about their medical history. Psychological questionnaires were not completed by telephone in order to avoid bias resulting from different methodologies. The Hungarian registry was searched for mortality information at the end of the fifth year.

2.5. End-point assessment

We have chosen all-cause mortality and hospitalisation due to MACCE [angina, congestive heart failure (CHF), MI, percutaneous coronary angioplasty, survived cardiac arrest, and death due to cardiac causes, stroke, re-CABG, and valve replacement] as clinical end-points. In 70% of the cases the clinical data were retrieved from the registry of our hospital, where the patients were treated, in the remaining 30% the data were retrieved from family doctors' registry.

2.6. Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using the SPSS 13.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Data were described as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (25th–75th percentile) for continuous variables and as number and percent for categorical variables of all patients belonging to the MACCE negative or MACCE positive patient group. Median (25th–75th percentile) follow-up was computed according to the Kaplan–Meier method. The observation time extended from the date of discharge to the date of first MACCE event or censoring. Preoperative and operative patient characteristics were compared according to the occurrence of MACCE by means of the Student's t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test and the χ2-test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The cumulative MACCE free survival probability and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and plotted separately for patients with and without MACCE according to the Kaplan–Meier method. Mortality rates (95% CI) per 100 person-years were reported. The prognostic value of MACCE was evaluated by means of Cox regression. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated. To account for the confounding effect of preoperative and operative characteristics, we adjusted the Cox model for the propensity score of MACCE. The propensity score is the conditional probability of each patient suffering from MACCE, based on his/her pretreatment characteristics. The propensity score adjusts the apparent influence of the comparison variables of interest for patient selection differences not accounted for by the other variables in the analysis. It was calculated by including variables linked to MACCE in a multivariate logistic model with MACCE being the dependent variable and the following variables being regressors: previous MI, previous CABG, history of arrhythmia, CHF, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal insufficiency, hypertension, and previous psychiatric hospitalisation, additive EuroSCORE, number of grafted vessels, CBP, aortic cross-clamp time, permanent stroke, reoperation for any reason, serious infection, prolonged mechanical ventilation, renal failure requiring dialysis, duration of ICU and hospital stay. The c-statistic for this model was computed to 0.78. We also evaluated the role of psychosocial factors investigated (measured at the second and fifth year and the mean of the two measurements) during follow-up in the Cox model by adjusting for propensity score. All tests were two-sided, and a value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

There were no difference in the urgency status (all of them were elective patients), length on the waiting list, number of delayed surgery and previous location before admission (home or other hospital) regarding to MACCE positive or MACCE negative patients. The overall incidence of MACCE was 45.0% (81 patients of the 180 patients). Median follow-up was 52 months (interquartile range: 36–64 months). The study profile and the follow-up are shown in Fig. 1 . The median of event-free survival was 36 months (95% CI: 30–42 months) in the MACCE positive patients. Twenty-eight patients (15.5%) died during the study period with a mortality rate of 2.25 per 100 person-years (Fig. 2 ).

Study profile. The diagram shows the main steps of the study including patients who died and those who had major adverse outcome during five-year follow-up. CHF, congestive heart failure; MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Fig. 1.

Study profile. The diagram shows the main steps of the study including patients who died and those who had major adverse outcome during five-year follow-up. CHF, congestive heart failure; MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of the two groups. Time after discharge is plotted against the cumulative survival. MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event.
Fig. 2.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of the two groups. Time after discharge is plotted against the cumulative survival. MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event.

At the end of the second year, 146 (81.0%) patients responded. Among the patients who completed the second year questionnaires, 62 (34.4%) experienced MACCE. At the end of the fifth year, 118 (65.5%) patients completed the questionnaires. Among the patients who responded at the end of the fifth year, 40 patients (22.2%) experienced adverse events (MACCE positive) and 78 patients (43.3%) were event-free.

The characteristics of the pre- and postoperative factors of the MACCE patients compared to MACCE negative patients are shown in Table 2 .

Table 2

Preoperative, perioperative and psychosocial factors and occurrence of MACCE five years after cardiac surgery

MACCE negativeMACCE positiveP-valueP-value*
(n=99)(n=81)
Preoperative factors
 Age (years)56.811.259.1 8.20.110.63
 Gender: female3232.3%2935.8%0.630.75
 Previous MI3737.4%2935.8%0.870.79
 Diabetes2121.2%2632.1%0.120.71
 Kidney failure 8 8.1% 7 8.6%10.99
 Hypertension4040.4%3340.7%0.540.68
 Hyperlipemia3838.4%2632.1%0.230.72
 Cerebrovascular disease1111.1%1417.2%0.280.76
 Psychiatric disease 9 9.1%1720.9%0.030.83
 EuroSCORE (scores) 3.17 2.4 3.77 2.50.970.59
Perioperative factors
 CABG surgery7272.7%6175.3%0.730.31
 Valvular surgery2121.2%2733.3%0.090.95
 Reoperation 2 2% 911.1%0.010.48
 CPB time (min)725179420.320.77
 Number of bypasses 2.2 1.5 1.96 1.470.290.91
 Myocardial infarction1313.1%1214.8%0.820.93
 Acute heart failure 9 9.1%1923.46%0.0070.89
 Infection 9 9.1%1113.6%0.350.96
 Arrhythmias1919.2%1923.5%0.470.82
 Intensive care unit days 1.3 1.3 3.5 8.50.0240.89
 Hospital days 9.3 4.3 9.6 9.70.790.54
Psychosocial factors
 Education (years)11.45 2.910.3 3.10.290.69
 Single living1616.2%1113.6%0.680.92
 Preoperative BDI (point) 8.2 5.111.8 8.70.006
 Preoperative STAI-S (point)42.911.347.211.10.012
 Preoperative STAI-T (point)41.8 9.248.1 9.9<0.001
MACCE negativeMACCE positiveP-valueP-value*
(n=99)(n=81)
Preoperative factors
 Age (years)56.811.259.1 8.20.110.63
 Gender: female3232.3%2935.8%0.630.75
 Previous MI3737.4%2935.8%0.870.79
 Diabetes2121.2%2632.1%0.120.71
 Kidney failure 8 8.1% 7 8.6%10.99
 Hypertension4040.4%3340.7%0.540.68
 Hyperlipemia3838.4%2632.1%0.230.72
 Cerebrovascular disease1111.1%1417.2%0.280.76
 Psychiatric disease 9 9.1%1720.9%0.030.83
 EuroSCORE (scores) 3.17 2.4 3.77 2.50.970.59
Perioperative factors
 CABG surgery7272.7%6175.3%0.730.31
 Valvular surgery2121.2%2733.3%0.090.95
 Reoperation 2 2% 911.1%0.010.48
 CPB time (min)725179420.320.77
 Number of bypasses 2.2 1.5 1.96 1.470.290.91
 Myocardial infarction1313.1%1214.8%0.820.93
 Acute heart failure 9 9.1%1923.46%0.0070.89
 Infection 9 9.1%1113.6%0.350.96
 Arrhythmias1919.2%1923.5%0.470.82
 Intensive care unit days 1.3 1.3 3.5 8.50.0240.89
 Hospital days 9.3 4.3 9.6 9.70.790.54
Psychosocial factors
 Education (years)11.45 2.910.3 3.10.290.69
 Single living1616.2%1113.6%0.680.92
 Preoperative BDI (point) 8.2 5.111.8 8.70.006
 Preoperative STAI-S (point)42.911.347.211.10.012
 Preoperative STAI-T (point)41.8 9.248.1 9.9<0.001

*P-values are those calculated after adjustment according to the propensity score. Data are presented as number and percent for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. Bold values represent the significant differences between groups when P<0.05.

MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CPB time, cardiopulmonary bypass time; BDI, Beck depression inventory; STAI-S, state anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAI-T, trait anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Table 2

Preoperative, perioperative and psychosocial factors and occurrence of MACCE five years after cardiac surgery

MACCE negativeMACCE positiveP-valueP-value*
(n=99)(n=81)
Preoperative factors
 Age (years)56.811.259.1 8.20.110.63
 Gender: female3232.3%2935.8%0.630.75
 Previous MI3737.4%2935.8%0.870.79
 Diabetes2121.2%2632.1%0.120.71
 Kidney failure 8 8.1% 7 8.6%10.99
 Hypertension4040.4%3340.7%0.540.68
 Hyperlipemia3838.4%2632.1%0.230.72
 Cerebrovascular disease1111.1%1417.2%0.280.76
 Psychiatric disease 9 9.1%1720.9%0.030.83
 EuroSCORE (scores) 3.17 2.4 3.77 2.50.970.59
Perioperative factors
 CABG surgery7272.7%6175.3%0.730.31
 Valvular surgery2121.2%2733.3%0.090.95
 Reoperation 2 2% 911.1%0.010.48
 CPB time (min)725179420.320.77
 Number of bypasses 2.2 1.5 1.96 1.470.290.91
 Myocardial infarction1313.1%1214.8%0.820.93
 Acute heart failure 9 9.1%1923.46%0.0070.89
 Infection 9 9.1%1113.6%0.350.96
 Arrhythmias1919.2%1923.5%0.470.82
 Intensive care unit days 1.3 1.3 3.5 8.50.0240.89
 Hospital days 9.3 4.3 9.6 9.70.790.54
Psychosocial factors
 Education (years)11.45 2.910.3 3.10.290.69
 Single living1616.2%1113.6%0.680.92
 Preoperative BDI (point) 8.2 5.111.8 8.70.006
 Preoperative STAI-S (point)42.911.347.211.10.012
 Preoperative STAI-T (point)41.8 9.248.1 9.9<0.001
MACCE negativeMACCE positiveP-valueP-value*
(n=99)(n=81)
Preoperative factors
 Age (years)56.811.259.1 8.20.110.63
 Gender: female3232.3%2935.8%0.630.75
 Previous MI3737.4%2935.8%0.870.79
 Diabetes2121.2%2632.1%0.120.71
 Kidney failure 8 8.1% 7 8.6%10.99
 Hypertension4040.4%3340.7%0.540.68
 Hyperlipemia3838.4%2632.1%0.230.72
 Cerebrovascular disease1111.1%1417.2%0.280.76
 Psychiatric disease 9 9.1%1720.9%0.030.83
 EuroSCORE (scores) 3.17 2.4 3.77 2.50.970.59
Perioperative factors
 CABG surgery7272.7%6175.3%0.730.31
 Valvular surgery2121.2%2733.3%0.090.95
 Reoperation 2 2% 911.1%0.010.48
 CPB time (min)725179420.320.77
 Number of bypasses 2.2 1.5 1.96 1.470.290.91
 Myocardial infarction1313.1%1214.8%0.820.93
 Acute heart failure 9 9.1%1923.46%0.0070.89
 Infection 9 9.1%1113.6%0.350.96
 Arrhythmias1919.2%1923.5%0.470.82
 Intensive care unit days 1.3 1.3 3.5 8.50.0240.89
 Hospital days 9.3 4.3 9.6 9.70.790.54
Psychosocial factors
 Education (years)11.45 2.910.3 3.10.290.69
 Single living1616.2%1113.6%0.680.92
 Preoperative BDI (point) 8.2 5.111.8 8.70.006
 Preoperative STAI-S (point)42.911.347.211.10.012
 Preoperative STAI-T (point)41.8 9.248.1 9.9<0.001

*P-values are those calculated after adjustment according to the propensity score. Data are presented as number and percent for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. Bold values represent the significant differences between groups when P<0.05.

MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CPB time, cardiopulmonary bypass time; BDI, Beck depression inventory; STAI-S, state anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAI-T, trait anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory.

MACCE positive patients had higher preoperative BDI scores (P=0.006), STAI-S (P=0.012) and STAI-T (P<0.001) scores compared to the event-free patients. Table 3 shows the propensity-adjusted results of the psychosocial tests completed at the end of the second and fifth year for the MACCE positive and MACCE negative patients. Among the second year questionnaires, scores of illness intrusiveness, sleeping problems, BDI, STAI-S and STAI-T scores had a positive hazard for MACCE after adjustment of medical factors. At the end of the fifth year, we found results similar to those of the second year follow-up. Additionally, SI (P=0.02) and NA (P=0.003) and their sum (P=0.005) was also associated with increased hazard for MACCE after propensity score adjustment. Type D personality had an adjusted hazard of 2.14 (95% CI: 1.08–4.23) at the end of the fifth year.

Table 3

Cox models for assessing the role of psychosocial variables after stratification for biomedical variables

Second year (n=154)Fifth year (n=118)
Adjusted95% CIP-valueAdjusted95% CIP-value
hazardhazard
ratioratio
Self-perceived health0.67(0.51–0.89)0.0060.72(0.52–1.00)0.048
Illness intrusiveness1.03(1.00–1.05)0.0181.04(1.02–1.05)<0.001
Social support (family)0.98(0.92–1.04)0.4170.99(0.91–1.08)0.801
Social support (broad)0.94(0.87–1.03)0.1861.03(0.92–1.17)0.580
Sleeping disorders1.14(1.05–1.24)0.0011.06(0.96–1.18)0.258
Social inhibition (SI)1.03(0.97–1.08)0.3101.08(1.01–1.14)0.020
Negative affectivity (NA)1.05(1.00–1.11)0.0681.08(1.03–1.14)0.003
Sum SI+NA1.02(0.92–1.05)0.1081.04(1.01–1.08)0.005
BDI1.12(1.07–1.18)0.0011.05(1.02–1.08)0.001
STAI-S1.09(1.05–1.13)<0.0011.05(1.03–1.08)0.001
STAI-T1.08(1.05–1.11)<0.0011.04(1.01–1.06)0.002
Second year (n=154)Fifth year (n=118)
Adjusted95% CIP-valueAdjusted95% CIP-value
hazardhazard
ratioratio
Self-perceived health0.67(0.51–0.89)0.0060.72(0.52–1.00)0.048
Illness intrusiveness1.03(1.00–1.05)0.0181.04(1.02–1.05)<0.001
Social support (family)0.98(0.92–1.04)0.4170.99(0.91–1.08)0.801
Social support (broad)0.94(0.87–1.03)0.1861.03(0.92–1.17)0.580
Sleeping disorders1.14(1.05–1.24)0.0011.06(0.96–1.18)0.258
Social inhibition (SI)1.03(0.97–1.08)0.3101.08(1.01–1.14)0.020
Negative affectivity (NA)1.05(1.00–1.11)0.0681.08(1.03–1.14)0.003
Sum SI+NA1.02(0.92–1.05)0.1081.04(1.01–1.08)0.005
BDI1.12(1.07–1.18)0.0011.05(1.02–1.08)0.001
STAI-S1.09(1.05–1.13)<0.0011.05(1.03–1.08)0.001
STAI-T1.08(1.05–1.11)<0.0011.04(1.01–1.06)0.002

Psychosocial tests were separately entered into the Cox model after adjustment for propensity scores including medical and perioperative variables. The adjusted hazard ratios were calculated for point increments of the reported psychosocial tests. For example, one point increase in the BDI score was associated with 12% increase in the risk for MACCE. Bold values represent the significant differences between groups when P<0.05.

CI, confidence interval; BDI, Beck depression inventory; STAI-S, state anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAI-T, trait anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Table 3

Cox models for assessing the role of psychosocial variables after stratification for biomedical variables

Second year (n=154)Fifth year (n=118)
Adjusted95% CIP-valueAdjusted95% CIP-value
hazardhazard
ratioratio
Self-perceived health0.67(0.51–0.89)0.0060.72(0.52–1.00)0.048
Illness intrusiveness1.03(1.00–1.05)0.0181.04(1.02–1.05)<0.001
Social support (family)0.98(0.92–1.04)0.4170.99(0.91–1.08)0.801
Social support (broad)0.94(0.87–1.03)0.1861.03(0.92–1.17)0.580
Sleeping disorders1.14(1.05–1.24)0.0011.06(0.96–1.18)0.258
Social inhibition (SI)1.03(0.97–1.08)0.3101.08(1.01–1.14)0.020
Negative affectivity (NA)1.05(1.00–1.11)0.0681.08(1.03–1.14)0.003
Sum SI+NA1.02(0.92–1.05)0.1081.04(1.01–1.08)0.005
BDI1.12(1.07–1.18)0.0011.05(1.02–1.08)0.001
STAI-S1.09(1.05–1.13)<0.0011.05(1.03–1.08)0.001
STAI-T1.08(1.05–1.11)<0.0011.04(1.01–1.06)0.002
Second year (n=154)Fifth year (n=118)
Adjusted95% CIP-valueAdjusted95% CIP-value
hazardhazard
ratioratio
Self-perceived health0.67(0.51–0.89)0.0060.72(0.52–1.00)0.048
Illness intrusiveness1.03(1.00–1.05)0.0181.04(1.02–1.05)<0.001
Social support (family)0.98(0.92–1.04)0.4170.99(0.91–1.08)0.801
Social support (broad)0.94(0.87–1.03)0.1861.03(0.92–1.17)0.580
Sleeping disorders1.14(1.05–1.24)0.0011.06(0.96–1.18)0.258
Social inhibition (SI)1.03(0.97–1.08)0.3101.08(1.01–1.14)0.020
Negative affectivity (NA)1.05(1.00–1.11)0.0681.08(1.03–1.14)0.003
Sum SI+NA1.02(0.92–1.05)0.1081.04(1.01–1.08)0.005
BDI1.12(1.07–1.18)0.0011.05(1.02–1.08)0.001
STAI-S1.09(1.05–1.13)<0.0011.05(1.03–1.08)0.001
STAI-T1.08(1.05–1.11)<0.0011.04(1.01–1.06)0.002

Psychosocial tests were separately entered into the Cox model after adjustment for propensity scores including medical and perioperative variables. The adjusted hazard ratios were calculated for point increments of the reported psychosocial tests. For example, one point increase in the BDI score was associated with 12% increase in the risk for MACCE. Bold values represent the significant differences between groups when P<0.05.

CI, confidence interval; BDI, Beck depression inventory; STAI-S, state anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAI-T, trait anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Table 4 shows the differences between the scores reached at the end of the second and fifth year for MACCE positive and negative patients. In the MACCE positive group, scores of illness intrusiveness, SI and sum of SI and NA, and the rate of sleeping disorders increased significantly from the second and fifth year. In contrast, intra-patient depression and anxiety scores did not change during the study period. Both groups reported decreased family and broad social support during the three-year period (P<0.001).

Table 4

Paired differences in MACCE positive and negative patients at the end of the 24th and 60th month

MACCE negativeMACCE positive
Difference (S.D.)P-valueDifference (S.D.)P-value
Self-perceived health 0.08 (0.81)0.400 0.05 (0.85)0.701
Illness intrusiveness scale 2.08 (17.80)0.198 6.90 (14.71)0.014
Social support (family)–6.51 (5.80)<0.001–6.51 (6.22)<0.001
Social support (broad)–9.77 (4.10)<0.001–6.52 (6.23)<0.001
Sleeping disorders 0.48 (2.40)0.097 1.71 (3.40)0.009
Social inhibition (SI)–0.30 (4.60)0.590 1.66 (4.26)0.036
Negative affectivity (NA) 0.76 (4.98)0.202 1.52 (4.51)0.062
Sum SI+NA 1.05 (8.26)0.280 3.15 (0.76)0.027
BDI–1.45 (5.88)0.084–0.66 (7.13)0.589
STAI-S 0.02 (10.68)0.990–0.70 (12.88)0.779
STAI-T 3.00 (10.12)0.015 2.97 (10.61)0.107
MACCE negativeMACCE positive
Difference (S.D.)P-valueDifference (S.D.)P-value
Self-perceived health 0.08 (0.81)0.400 0.05 (0.85)0.701
Illness intrusiveness scale 2.08 (17.80)0.198 6.90 (14.71)0.014
Social support (family)–6.51 (5.80)<0.001–6.51 (6.22)<0.001
Social support (broad)–9.77 (4.10)<0.001–6.52 (6.23)<0.001
Sleeping disorders 0.48 (2.40)0.097 1.71 (3.40)0.009
Social inhibition (SI)–0.30 (4.60)0.590 1.66 (4.26)0.036
Negative affectivity (NA) 0.76 (4.98)0.202 1.52 (4.51)0.062
Sum SI+NA 1.05 (8.26)0.280 3.15 (0.76)0.027
BDI–1.45 (5.88)0.084–0.66 (7.13)0.589
STAI-S 0.02 (10.68)0.990–0.70 (12.88)0.779
STAI-T 3.00 (10.12)0.015 2.97 (10.61)0.107

In MACCE negative and MACCE positive study populations the individual differences of the psychosocial variables were investigated with paired t-test. The differences are shown as mean and standard deviation. Bold values represent the significant differences between groups when P<0.05.

MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; S.D., standard deviation; BDI, Beck depression inventory; STAI-S, state anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAI-T, trait anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Table 4

Paired differences in MACCE positive and negative patients at the end of the 24th and 60th month

MACCE negativeMACCE positive
Difference (S.D.)P-valueDifference (S.D.)P-value
Self-perceived health 0.08 (0.81)0.400 0.05 (0.85)0.701
Illness intrusiveness scale 2.08 (17.80)0.198 6.90 (14.71)0.014
Social support (family)–6.51 (5.80)<0.001–6.51 (6.22)<0.001
Social support (broad)–9.77 (4.10)<0.001–6.52 (6.23)<0.001
Sleeping disorders 0.48 (2.40)0.097 1.71 (3.40)0.009
Social inhibition (SI)–0.30 (4.60)0.590 1.66 (4.26)0.036
Negative affectivity (NA) 0.76 (4.98)0.202 1.52 (4.51)0.062
Sum SI+NA 1.05 (8.26)0.280 3.15 (0.76)0.027
BDI–1.45 (5.88)0.084–0.66 (7.13)0.589
STAI-S 0.02 (10.68)0.990–0.70 (12.88)0.779
STAI-T 3.00 (10.12)0.015 2.97 (10.61)0.107
MACCE negativeMACCE positive
Difference (S.D.)P-valueDifference (S.D.)P-value
Self-perceived health 0.08 (0.81)0.400 0.05 (0.85)0.701
Illness intrusiveness scale 2.08 (17.80)0.198 6.90 (14.71)0.014
Social support (family)–6.51 (5.80)<0.001–6.51 (6.22)<0.001
Social support (broad)–9.77 (4.10)<0.001–6.52 (6.23)<0.001
Sleeping disorders 0.48 (2.40)0.097 1.71 (3.40)0.009
Social inhibition (SI)–0.30 (4.60)0.590 1.66 (4.26)0.036
Negative affectivity (NA) 0.76 (4.98)0.202 1.52 (4.51)0.062
Sum SI+NA 1.05 (8.26)0.280 3.15 (0.76)0.027
BDI–1.45 (5.88)0.084–0.66 (7.13)0.589
STAI-S 0.02 (10.68)0.990–0.70 (12.88)0.779
STAI-T 3.00 (10.12)0.015 2.97 (10.61)0.107

In MACCE negative and MACCE positive study populations the individual differences of the psychosocial variables were investigated with paired t-test. The differences are shown as mean and standard deviation. Bold values represent the significant differences between groups when P<0.05.

MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; S.D., standard deviation; BDI, Beck depression inventory; STAI-S, state anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAI-T, trait anxiety subscale in Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory.

4. Discussion

We have found that psychosocial factors, as illness intrusiveness, depression, anxiety, sleeping disorders measured by standardized questionnaires were associated independently with the occurrence of MACCE after adjustment of biomedical factors and perioperative variables after cardiac surgery. Additionally, severity of illness intrusiveness, sleeping problems and SI increased in the MACCE positive patients during the three-year period; these tendencies were not observed in the event-free group.

Epidemiological studies suggested that psychosocial factors, such as social support, depressive symptoms and anxiety play a pivotal role in the development and course of coronary heart disease and influence the long-term outcome after heart surgery regardless of on- or off-pump procedures [11]. Time spent on the waiting list however has been related to anxiety and depression [12]. In accordance with these findings, we have found that depression and anxiety were higher in the MACCE positive group in the preoperative period. The psychological variables above can be treated as a marker for poor adjustment of stress situation, like major cardiac surgery, but at the same time they also contribute to prolonged or poor recovery. These psychosocial vulnerability concepts may serve explanation for our findings that BDI and STAI-T scores did not change significantly during the three years, while scores of illness intrusiveness and sleeping disorders increased solely in MACCE positive patients. It suggests that the personality of the patient might also contribute to the development of major adverse events, or even undermine short- and long-term recovery.

The simple question about the self-estimation of health status strongly predicted mortality and stroke [13]. Similarly, illness intrusiveness was reported to be useful for measuring the effectiveness of treatment and pivotal life-determining factors of illness [14]. We have found that self-rated health and illness intrusiveness were applicable in our study population and these tests were associated independently with increased risk for MACCE after controlling of biomedical factors.

The present study has several limitations. For example, a larger and more homogenous sample of patients is needed to more precisely assess the influence of different psychosocial factors on long-term mortality and morbidity. In addition, frequency of rehospitalisation could not be analyzed by this statistical method. We also did several comparisons without adjusting for multiplicity, thus the probability of the type I error is above the nominal 5%. Another limitation is that not all questionnaires were administered at all time points and the majority of the tests were sent at the end of the second and fifth year. Unfortunately, only BDI, STAI-S and STAI-T were measured at baseline. Other problem was that data regarding lifestyle factors and the postoperative rehabilitation were not collected; however, rehabilitation may theoretically reduce the incidences reported in this current study. On voluntary basis immediately after discharge six-week cardiac rehabilitation was offered to the patients. About 5% of the overage postcardiac population took part in the rehabilitation focused on stepwise physical load and dietary education.

In conclusion, depression, anxiety, illness intrusiveness, sleeping disorders and worse self-rated health were associated with increased hazard for MACCEs five years after cardiac surgery after adjustment of biomedical factors. By measuring psychosocial factors, the future ‘candidates’ for rehospitalisation could be detected earlier, and by treating these risk factors, rehospitalisation might be prevented.

This study was supported by grants from the Hungarian Research Foundation (OTKA-T-035169), Budapest, Hungary, and by National Research and Development Programs (NKFP 1b/020/2004), Budapest, Hungary.

References

1
Shen
BJ
Wachowiak
PS
Brooks
LG
,
Psychosocial factors and assessment in cardiac rehabilitation
Eura Medicophys
,
2005
, vol.
41
(pg.
75
-
91
)
2
Denollet
J
Strik
JJ
Lousberg
R
Honig
A
,
Recognizing increased risk of depressive comorbidity after myocardial infarction: looking for 4 symptoms of anxiety-depression
Psychother Psychosom
,
2006
, vol.
75
(pg.
346
-
352
)
3
Roques
F
Nashef
SA
Michel
P
Gauducheau
E
de Vincentiis
C
Baudet
E
Cortina
J
David
M
Faichney
A
Gabrielle
F
Gams
E
Harjula
A
Jones
MT
Pintor
PP
Salamon
R
Thulin
L
,
Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
,
1999
, vol.
15
(pg.
816
-
822
)
4
Ferguson
TB
Jr
Dziubian
SW
Edwards
FH
,
Committee to establish a national database in cardiothoracic surgery. The society of thoracic surgeons. The STS database. Current changes and challenges for the new millennium
Ann Thorac Surg
,
2000
, vol.
69
(pg.
680
-
691
)
5
Skrabski
Á
Kopp
MS
Rózsa
S
Réthelyi
J
Rahe
RH
,
Life meaning: an important correlate of health in the Hungarian population
Int J Behav Med
,
2005
, vol.
12
(pg.
78
-
85
)
6
Novak
M
Mucsi
I
Shapiro
CM
Rethelyi
J
Kopp
MS
,
Increased utilization of health services by insomniacs – an epidemiological perspective
J Psychosom Res
,
2004
, vol.
56
(pg.
527
-
536
)
7
Denollet
J
,
DS14: standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and type D personality
Psychosom Med
,
2005
, vol.
67
(pg.
89
-
97
)
8
Frasure-Smith
N
Lesperance
F
Talajic
M
,
The impact of negative emotions on prognosis following myocardial infarction: is it more than depression
Health Psychol
,
1995
, vol.
14
(pg.
388
-
398
)
9
Berkman
LF
Blumenthal
J
Burg
M
Carney
RM
Catellier
D
Cowan
MJ
Czajkowski
SM
De Busk
R
Hosking
J
Jaffe
A
Kaufmann
PG
Mitchell
P
Norman
J
Powell
LH
Raczynski
JM
Schneiderman
N
,
Enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients investigators (ENRICHD). Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients (ENRICHD) randomized trial
J Am Med Assoc
,
2003
, vol.
289
(pg.
3106
-
3116
)
10
Novak
M
Mah
K
Molnar
MZ
Ambrus
C
Csepanyi
G
Kovacs
A
Vamos
E
Zambo
M
Zoller
R
Mucsi
I
Devins
GM
,
Factor structure and reliability of the Hungarian version of the illness intrusiveness scale: invariance across North American and Hungarian dialysis patients
J Psychosom Res
,
2005
, vol.
58
(pg.
103
-
110
)
11
Contrada
RJ
Boulifard
DA
Hekler
EB
Idler
EL
Spruill
TM
Labouvie
EW
Krause
TJ
,
Psychosocial factors in heart surgery: presurgical vulnerability and postsurgical recovery
Health Psychol
,
2008
, vol.
27
(pg.
309
-
319
)
12
Underwood
MJ
Firmin
RK
Jehu
D
,
Aspects of psychological and social morbidity in patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting
Br Heart J
,
1993
, vol.
69
(pg.
382
-
384
)
13
Denollet
J
Pedersen
SS
Vrints
CJ
Conraads
VM
,
Usefulness of type D personality in predicting five-year cardiac events above and beyond concurrent symptoms of stress in patients with coronary heart disease
Am J Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
97
(pg.
970
-
973
)
14
Emmelin
M
Weinehall
L
Stegmayr
B
Dahlgren
L
Stenlund
H
Wall
S
,
Self-rated ill-health strengthens the effect of biomedical risk factors in predicting stroke, especially for men – an incident case referent study
J Hypertens
,
2003
, vol.
21
(pg.
887
-
896
)