ABSTRACT

The objective of the study was to evaluate changes in microbial communities with the predicted arrival of new species to Mediterranean forests under projected intensification of water stress conditions. For that, litter from three Mediterranean forests dominated respectively by Quercus pubescens Willd., Quercus ilex L. and Pinus halepensis Mill. were collected, and placed to their ‘home’ forest but also to the two other forests under natural and amplified drought conditions (i.e. rainfall reduction of 30%). Quantitative PCR showed that overall, actinobacteria and total bacteria were more abundant in Q. pubescens and Q. ilex than in P. halepensis litter. However, the abundance of both groups was dependent on the forest sites: placement of allochthonous litter to Q. pubescens and P. halepensis forests (i.e. P. halepensis and Q. pubescens, respectively) increased bacterial and fungal abundances, while no effect was observed in Q. ilex forest. P. halepensis litter in Q. pubescens and Q. ilex forests significantly reduced actinobacteria (A/F) and total bacteria (B/F) to fungi ratios. The reduction of rainfall did not influence actinobacteria and bacteria but caused an increase of fungi. As a result, a reduction of A/F ratio is expected with the plant community change towards the dominance of spreading P. halepensis under amplified drought conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Microorganisms are key actors in nutrient cycling and carbon turnover during litter decomposition (Gessner et al. 2010; Garcia-Pausas and Paterson 2011). At a global scale, it is estimated that the soil C coming from soil microbial biomass is about 16.7 Pg C, which represents approximately 2.3–2.4% of total organic C found in soil in the top 30 cm (Xu, Thornton and Post 2013). Heterotrophic respiration resulting from microbial litter decomposing activity can account for 10–90% of the CO2 efflux from soils and substantially affect the atmospheric CO2 concentration (Manzoni et al. 2012). However, annual reduction of rainfall by up to 30% predicted for the Mediterranean basin (Giorgi and Lionello 2008; IPCC 2014; Hertig and Tramblay 2017) may significantly impact microbial abundance and structure, and thus, also the overall C dynamics (Wardle and Putten 2002).

Studies have already demonstrated shifts in plant community composition in response to the changed climatic conditions (Morales et al. 2007; Bertrand et al. 2011; Guiot and Cramer 2016). In southern France, dominating downy oak (Quercus pubescens Willd.) is expected to be replaced by more drought tolerant species: the sclerophylls’ evergreen holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) and Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) (Barbero et al. 1990; Fortunel et al. 2009). Additionally, the increase of water stress may induce the synthesis of plant secondary metabolites (e.g. phenolics) known for their phytotoxic activities and anti-appetizing effects, which limit leaf consumption by fauna (Chomel et al. 2014). This investment in defence mechanisms over primary metabolic processes may result on the one hand to the decrease of primary productivity (Ogaya and Peñuelas 2007) and thus litter inputs, and on the other hand, in the reduction of litter quality through the increase of recalcitrant organic compounds (i.e. lignin, wax, polyphenolics) (Ormeño et al. 2006; Hättenschwiler and Jørgensen 2010; Sagova-Mareckova et al. 2011). Moreover, the reduction of moisture level may induce physiological stress and limit dispersal of microorganisms, enzymatic activities and substrate diffusion (Bouskill et al. 2013). Thus, the reduction of moisture levels and aboveground litter quality and quantity may impose new community dynamics belowground (Lunghini et al. 2013; Cleveland et al. 2014) and lead to a shift of soil microbial communities to more drought tolerant species, capable of using recalcitrant C sources and resistant to desiccation (Yuste et al. 2011; Peñuelas et al. 2012; Allison et al. 2013). Actinobacteria are known to thrive in low resource environments (Fierer, Bradford and Jackson 2007) and low soil moisture conditions (Yuste et al. 2011; De Vries and Shade 2013; Acosta-Martinez et al. 2014) reaching high abundance in arid soils (Okoro et al. 2009). They are well protected by a strong, thick interlinked peptidoglycan cell wall, which explains their high resistance to low osmotic potential conditions (Davet 2004). They produce enzymes able to degrade a wide range of biopolymers, whose building blocks including aromatic compounds (McCarthy and Williams 1992) have a vital role in organic matter turnover and humus formations (Anandan, Dharumadurai and Manogaran 2016). They produce a variety of secondary metabolites (Anandan et al. 2016), through which they interact with other microbial groups (Lewin et al. 2016). However, little is known about how microbial communities and actinobacteria in particular, would be affected by future reduction of rainfall, both directly by decrease of moisture level and indirectly through the plant species shift. In general, litter types sharing a common history with local microbial communities (autochthonous) have faster decomposition rates than litter types coming from distant (allochthonous) habitats (Gholz et al. 2000; Strickland et al. 2009). Consequently, changes in biochemical composition of local litter with the arrival of new species may constrain microbial activity and impact negatively litter decomposition (Schimel, Balser and Wallenstein 2007).

In here, we examine how reduction of rainfall and change in plant species may affect belowground microbial community's (actinobacteria, fungi and total bacteria) abundance and structure and consequently also the litter decomposition process. For that, we performed a litter transplanting experiment between three main Mediterranean forests (Q. pubescens Willd., Q. ilex L., and P. halepensis Mill.) occurring in Southeast of France, under natural and amplified drought conditions for simulating the 30% rainfall reduction. We hypothesised that the arrival of new litter under amplified drought conditions will have a negative impact on microbial abundance and litter decomposition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sites description

This study was conducted at the three forest sites in the Mediterranean region in southern France: the Q. pubescens forest at Oak Observatory at the ‘Observatoire de Haute Provence’ (O3HP; Santonja et al. 2015a), the Q. ilex forest at Puéchabon (Limousin et al. 2008) and the mixed P. halepensis forest at Font-Blanche (Table 1). During the study period, the mean annual temperature was 12.1°C, 13.7°C and 14.0°C, and the cumulative annual precipitation was 609 mm, 794 mm and 632 mm, respectively (Table 1; Supplementary Figure 1, Supporting Information). There were no significant differences between sites in the mean annual temperature and cumulative annual precipitation during the study period (One-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). Each site included a control plot (natural drought—ND) and a rain exclusion plot (amplified drought—AD) to mimic the future reduction of rainfall predicted by the climatic model for the Mediterranean Region (about -30% yearly; Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 2, Supporting Information).

Leaf litter mass loss (A) and associated leaf litter microbial decomposers abundances (actinobacteria (B), bacteria (C), fungi (D)), actinobacteria to fungi (E) and bacteria to fungi (F) ratios, for the three forests and litter species (control and amplified drought conditions were combined). Values are mean ± SE (n = 14). Different letters denote significant differences between litter species within forest sites (e.g. both drought conditions combined), with a > b > c. DM = litter dry mass. Qp = Q. pubescens, Qi = Q. ilex, Ph = P. halepensis.
Figure 1.

Leaf litter mass loss (A) and associated leaf litter microbial decomposers abundances (actinobacteria (B), bacteria (C), fungi (D)), actinobacteria to fungi (E) and bacteria to fungi (F) ratios, for the three forests and litter species (control and amplified drought conditions were combined). Values are mean ± SE (n = 14). Different letters denote significant differences between litter species within forest sites (e.g. both drought conditions combined), with a > b > c. DM = litter dry mass. Qp = Q. pubescens, Qi = Q. ilex, Ph = P. halepensis.

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the three forest sites selected for this study (for the study period: December 2014 to December 2015).

ForestsQ. pubescens Willd.Q. ilex L.Mixed P. halepensis Mill.
SitesOak Observatory at the Observatoire de Haute ProvencePuéchabonFont-Blanche
Location430 56' 115'' N, 050 42' 642'' E43° 44' 29''N, 3°35' 45''E43°14'27'' N, 5°40'45'' E
Altitude a.s.l. (m)650270425
MAT (Mean Annual Temperature) (°C)12.2513.7114.01
MAP (Mean Annual Precipitation) (mm)609794632
Soil typepierric calcosolrhodo-chromic luvisolleptosol
Soil textureclayclay loamclay
Soil pH6.766.66.8
Surface rocks cover (%)237550
Dominant tree speciesQ. pubescens Willd.Q. ilexL.mixed P. halepensis Mill./Q. ilex L.
Other dominant plant speciesAcer monspessulanum LBuxus sempervirensL.Quercus coccifera L.
Cotinus coggygria Scop.Phyllirea latifolial L.Phyllirea latifoliaL.
Pistacia terebinthus L.
Juniperus oxycedrus L.
Tree density (stems/ ha)350345003368
Forest structureeven-age (70 years)even-age (74 years)uneven-age (61 years)
Rain exclusion system dimensions (m2)300140625
Rain exclusion (%)333030
ForestsQ. pubescens Willd.Q. ilex L.Mixed P. halepensis Mill.
SitesOak Observatory at the Observatoire de Haute ProvencePuéchabonFont-Blanche
Location430 56' 115'' N, 050 42' 642'' E43° 44' 29''N, 3°35' 45''E43°14'27'' N, 5°40'45'' E
Altitude a.s.l. (m)650270425
MAT (Mean Annual Temperature) (°C)12.2513.7114.01
MAP (Mean Annual Precipitation) (mm)609794632
Soil typepierric calcosolrhodo-chromic luvisolleptosol
Soil textureclayclay loamclay
Soil pH6.766.66.8
Surface rocks cover (%)237550
Dominant tree speciesQ. pubescens Willd.Q. ilexL.mixed P. halepensis Mill./Q. ilex L.
Other dominant plant speciesAcer monspessulanum LBuxus sempervirensL.Quercus coccifera L.
Cotinus coggygria Scop.Phyllirea latifolial L.Phyllirea latifoliaL.
Pistacia terebinthus L.
Juniperus oxycedrus L.
Tree density (stems/ ha)350345003368
Forest structureeven-age (70 years)even-age (74 years)uneven-age (61 years)
Rain exclusion system dimensions (m2)300140625
Rain exclusion (%)333030
Table 1.

Main characteristics of the three forest sites selected for this study (for the study period: December 2014 to December 2015).

ForestsQ. pubescens Willd.Q. ilex L.Mixed P. halepensis Mill.
SitesOak Observatory at the Observatoire de Haute ProvencePuéchabonFont-Blanche
Location430 56' 115'' N, 050 42' 642'' E43° 44' 29''N, 3°35' 45''E43°14'27'' N, 5°40'45'' E
Altitude a.s.l. (m)650270425
MAT (Mean Annual Temperature) (°C)12.2513.7114.01
MAP (Mean Annual Precipitation) (mm)609794632
Soil typepierric calcosolrhodo-chromic luvisolleptosol
Soil textureclayclay loamclay
Soil pH6.766.66.8
Surface rocks cover (%)237550
Dominant tree speciesQ. pubescens Willd.Q. ilexL.mixed P. halepensis Mill./Q. ilex L.
Other dominant plant speciesAcer monspessulanum LBuxus sempervirensL.Quercus coccifera L.
Cotinus coggygria Scop.Phyllirea latifolial L.Phyllirea latifoliaL.
Pistacia terebinthus L.
Juniperus oxycedrus L.
Tree density (stems/ ha)350345003368
Forest structureeven-age (70 years)even-age (74 years)uneven-age (61 years)
Rain exclusion system dimensions (m2)300140625
Rain exclusion (%)333030
ForestsQ. pubescens Willd.Q. ilex L.Mixed P. halepensis Mill.
SitesOak Observatory at the Observatoire de Haute ProvencePuéchabonFont-Blanche
Location430 56' 115'' N, 050 42' 642'' E43° 44' 29''N, 3°35' 45''E43°14'27'' N, 5°40'45'' E
Altitude a.s.l. (m)650270425
MAT (Mean Annual Temperature) (°C)12.2513.7114.01
MAP (Mean Annual Precipitation) (mm)609794632
Soil typepierric calcosolrhodo-chromic luvisolleptosol
Soil textureclayclay loamclay
Soil pH6.766.66.8
Surface rocks cover (%)237550
Dominant tree speciesQ. pubescens Willd.Q. ilexL.mixed P. halepensis Mill./Q. ilex L.
Other dominant plant speciesAcer monspessulanum LBuxus sempervirensL.Quercus coccifera L.
Cotinus coggygria Scop.Phyllirea latifolial L.Phyllirea latifoliaL.
Pistacia terebinthus L.
Juniperus oxycedrus L.
Tree density (stems/ ha)350345003368
Forest structureeven-age (70 years)even-age (74 years)uneven-age (61 years)
Rain exclusion system dimensions (m2)300140625
Rain exclusion (%)333030

Experimental design and sample processing

In 2014, senescent leaves were collected in the control plot of the three forests. For that, litter traps were used during the abscission period that occurred from October to November for the broadleaves (Q. ilex and Q. pubescens) and from June to September for the needles (P. halepensis). Leaves and needles were air dried and stored at room temperature in paper boxes until the beginning of the experiment.

Litter decomposition was assessed by using the litter bag method (Swift et al. 1979). Four-mm mesh litter bags (20 × 20 cm) containing 10 g (air-dried) of the senescent material were used to perform the experiment. Litter transplants were made between each site for the three species considered, i.e. a litter bag containing the litter of each species placed on each forest site, under two drought conditions: natural (ND) and amplified (AD) (see Supplementary Figure 3, Supporting Information).

Thus, the experiment consisted in 18 modalities corresponding to the 3 forests Q. ilex, Q. pubescens and P. halepensis) × 3 plant species (Q. ilex, Q. pubescens and P. halepensis) × 2 drought conditions (ND and AD). In total, 126 litter bags (18 modalities × 1 sampling date × 7 replicates) were analysed. Litter bags were placed perpendicularly to the gutters system in Aleppo pine and holm oak forests and under the rain exclusion device in the downy oak forest, by using a transect in blocks (7 columns x 6 lines), equidistantly one from each other (1 m distance between the 7 columns and 0.6 m between the 6 lines). Transects were E-W oriented. They were disposed in the ground floor after the removal of litter layer and fixed to the soil with galvanised nails to prevent movement by animals or wind. Litter layer was then replaced over the litterbags.

Litter bags were retrieved after 1 year (December 2015). Litterbags were placed in zipped plastic bags to prevent the loss of biological material. In the laboratory, the soil and other debris were removed from the litter bags. Then, they were freeze-dried (Lyovac GT2) for 72 hours and the remaining dry mass (%) was calculated. A 1 g of dry mass aliquote was collected, grounded to powder (Retsch® MM400, 30 Hz during 30s) and kept at -20°C for posteriori microbial DNA analysis.

Initial litter chemical characteristics

At the beginning of the experiment, 5 replicates from each leaf species collected from trees in control plots were grounded to powder (Retsch® MM400, 30 Hz during 30s). Carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) were determined by thermal combustion on a Flash EA 1112 series C/N elemental analyser (Thermo-Scientific, U.S.A). Phosphorus (P) and cations (Ca, K, Mg and Na) were extracted from 80 mg of ground litter sample with 8 ml of nitric acid and 2 ml of H2O2 at 175°C for 40 min using a microwave digestion system (Ethos One, Milestone SRL, Sorisole, Italy). After the mineralisation, each sample was adjusted to 50 ml with demineralised water. Phosphorus concentration was measured at 720 nm using a microplate reader (Victor, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Cations were determined using an atom absorption spectrometer (AAS, iCE 3000 series, Thermo-Scientific, China). Leaf structural compounds (lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose) and water-soluble compounds (WSC) concentrations were determined according to the van Soest extraction protocol (Van Soest and Wine 1967), using a fiber analyser (Fibersac 24; Ankom®, Macedon, NJ, USA). Total phenolic concentrations were measured by colorimetry according to the method of Peñuelas et al. (1996) using gallic acid as standard. Aqueous extracts were made by dissolving 0.25 g of litter powder in 20 ml of 70% aqueous methanol solution with shaking for 1 hour and filtered (0.45 μm). A total of 25 ml of extracts obtained were then mixed with 0.25 ml of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (Folin and Denis 1915), 0.5 ml of saturated aqueous Na2CO3 (to stabilize the colorimetric reaction) and 4 ml of distilled water. After 60 min, the reaction was completed and the concentration of phenolics was measured at 765 nm using a UV / Vis spectrophotometer (Thermoscientific, U.S.A.).

To determine the water holding capacity (WHC), twenty-one freshly abscised leaves (3 species x 5 replicates) were soaked in distilled water for 24 hours, drained and weighted (wet weight). The dry weight was measured after drying the samples for 48 hours at 60°C. Water holding capacity (in %) was calculated according to the formula: (wet weight/dry weight) × 100 (Santonja et al. 2015b). Specific leaf area (SLA) was determined by using the Image J software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, MA, USA). Specific leaf area was calculated as the ratio between leaf area and leaf dry weight.

DNA extraction

Environmental DNA from leaf litter samples was extracted with the NucleoSpin® soil kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), following the standard protocol with a slight adjustment. In brief, approximately 250 mg of dry litter was added to the NucleoSpin Bead tubes. Lysis conditions were performed by using buffer SL1 (700 µl, vortex for 5 min, room temperature, 11 000 x g for 2 min), and buffer SL3 (150µl, vortex 5 min, 0–4°C, 14 000 g for 1 min). This procedure was repeated twice using the same sample to optimise the DNA extraction. The filtration of the supernatant was performed in the NucleoSpin Inhibitor Removal Column followed by 11 000 x g for 1 min. DNA binding was done in the Nucleo Spin Soil column after adding 250 µl of Buffer SB to the supernatant followed by 11 000 x g for 1 min. A series of successive DNA washing was performed: 500 µl buffer SB (11 000 x g, 3 sec), 550 µl buffer SW1 (11 000 xg, 3 sec), 700 µl SW2 (2 sec vortex, 11 000 x g, 3 sec). At each step, flow-through were discarded. Finally, DNA was eluted in 30 µl of Buffer SE followed by incubation at room temperature for 1 min and 11 000 x g for 30 seconds and kept at -20°C until further analysis. DNA quantification was performed in the ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technology, Wilmington, DE).

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Abundances of total bacteria, actinobacteria and fungi were assessed using a quantitative real-time PCR analysis (qPCR) method. Microbial abundance was quantified as copy number of a target gene. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified from the total bacteria using primers COM1 (5′–CAGCAGCCGCGGTAATAC–3′) and 769R (5′–ATCCTGTTTGMTMCCCVCRC–3′, annealing temperature 59°C) (Dorn-In et al. 2015), and from actinobacteria using primers S-P-Acti-1154-a-S-19 (5′–GRDACYGCCGGGGTYAACT–3′ annealing temperature 59°C) and S-P-Acti-1339-a-A-18 (5′–TCWGCGATTACTAGCGAC–3′) (Pfeiffer et al. 2014). Partial 18S rRNA genes from fungi were amplified with primers FF390 (5′–CGATAACGAACGAGACCT-3′) and FR1 (5′–AICCATTCAATCGGTAIT-3′, annealing temperature 50°C) (Vainio and Hantula 2000). All PCR reactions were done 15 µl total volume containing 1 × SYBR® Green Gotaq PCR Master Mix (Promega), primers at 600 nM for total bacteria and fungi, and 200 nM for actinobacteria, and 0.2–2 ng environmental DNA. The cycling parameters were: 10 min at 95°C followed by 45 cycles at 95°C (15 sec), 59°C (30 sec), 72°C (30 sec). Melting curves were recorded to ensure qPCR specificity, and gel electrophoresis analyses were performed to confirm the expected size of amplified products. All qPCR reactions were run in triplicate on StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). To quantify the target gene copy numbers, standard dilution curves of known concentrations of previously cloned standards of the target genes were determined. Baseline and threshold calculations and data analysis were performed with the StepOne v. 2.2.2 software.

The primer pair recommended by Dorn-In et al. (2015) for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragment from plant samples, Com1/769R (Rastogi et al. 2010; Fredriksson, Hermansson and Wilén 2013) was used for quantitative real-time PCR analysis of the total bacteria. The primer pair does not amplify 16 rRNA genes from chloroplasts, however, consequently also its coverage of the domain Bacteria is incomplete. In silico analysis using TestPrime 1.0 (Klindworth et al. 2013) against the Silva database, release 132 (www.arb-silva.de), showed 75% overall coverage of Bacteria with varying representation of the phyla, e.g. 88% Proteobacteria, 81.9% Firmicutes, 93.6% Bacteroidetes, but only 56.2% Actinobacteria, 20.5% Acidobacteria and 17.5% Verrucomicrobia. Therefore, the results can be used as a proxy of bacterial abundance when comparing between samples, but not to compare with qPCR quantification of individual bacterial phyla or lower taxonomic units using group-specific primers.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed in R v.3.1.3 software (R Development Core Team 2017). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine differences between the initial parameters of litter plant species and between forest sites for each litter species and microbial group. Three-way ANOVA was also used to test the effects of forest sites (S), litter species (L) and drought treatment (D) on litter mass loss and microbial abundance (total bacteria (B), actinobacteria (A), fungi (F) and the respective B/F and A/F ratios, followed by post-hoc Tukey tests. Microbial abundance was log-transformed to fit the assumption of normality and homoscedasticity.

RESULTS

Initial litter composition

Initial litter characteristics varied significantly among species (Table 2, One-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). Quercus ilex showed a significantly higher N (9.62 mg g−1) and P (3.48 mg g−1) contents than the two other species, particularly P. halepensis (5.36 mg g−1 and 1.56 mg g−1), which resulted in a lowest C/N and C/P ratio for Q. ilex and highest ratios for P. halepensis (Table 2). Regarding the cations, Q. pubescens showed significantly higher content of Ca (32.90 mg g−1) and Mg (2.83 mg g−1), and lower content of K (0.84 mg g−1) and Na (0.04 mg g−1) than the two other species. Concerning the structural compounds of the leaves, Q. ilex had higher lignin (337.38 mg g−1) and cellulose content (204.99 mg g−1) than the two other species. Finally, Q. pubescens showed higher total phenolics content compared to Q. ilex, and the highest specific leaf area (133.13 mg g−1) and water holding capacity (146.90 mg g−1). Pinus halepensis showed higher water-soluble compounds (340.02 mg g−1) and lower water holding capacity (113.89 mg g−1).

Table 2.

Initial leaf litter quality of each litter species: Q. pubescens, Q. ilex and P. halepensis, the values are mean ± SE (n = 5) and the results of the one-way ANOVA to test differences between initial litter species are indicated (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 and different letters denote significant differences among species with a>b>c.)

dfQ. pubescensQ. ilexP. halepensisF-ratio
Carbon2462.6 ± 2.65c478.1 ± 1.4b516.1 ± 1.6a198.80***
Nitrogen26.4 ± 0.2b9.6 ± 0.2a5.4 ± 0.1c146.30***
Phosphorus21.9 ± 0.1b3.5 ± 0.2a1.6 ± 0.1b64.6***
Calcium232.9 ± 0.8a25.1 ± 0.6b18.4 ± 0.2c168.1***
Potassium20.8 ± 0.01c1.8 ± 0.1a0.95 ± 0.01b370.7***
Magnesium22.8 ± 0.2a1.4 ± 0.01b1.5 ± 0.02c104.8***
Sodium20.04 ± 0.00b0.11 ± 0.00a0.11 ± 0.00a149.6***
Total phenolics240.8 ± 2.6a32.9 ± 1.58b38.6 ± 1.2ab4.7*
Lignin2273.3 ± 9.0b337.4 ± 5.5a302.6 ± 10.6b13.8***
Cellulose2159.1 ± 8.0b205 ± 4.2a150.8 ± 12.9b10.3**
Hemicellulose2274.2 ± 22.5a270.0 ± 16.2ab206.6 ± 10.4b4.7*
Water-soluble compounds2293.4 ± 12.1b187.6 ± 10.2c340.0 ± 7.1a60.9***
Specific leaf area2133.1 ± 0.4a51.5 ± 0.9c83.5 ± 2.2b690.7***
Water holding capacity2146.9 ± 1.0a137.2 ± 1.0b113.9 ± 1.03c285.5***
dfQ. pubescensQ. ilexP. halepensisF-ratio
Carbon2462.6 ± 2.65c478.1 ± 1.4b516.1 ± 1.6a198.80***
Nitrogen26.4 ± 0.2b9.6 ± 0.2a5.4 ± 0.1c146.30***
Phosphorus21.9 ± 0.1b3.5 ± 0.2a1.6 ± 0.1b64.6***
Calcium232.9 ± 0.8a25.1 ± 0.6b18.4 ± 0.2c168.1***
Potassium20.8 ± 0.01c1.8 ± 0.1a0.95 ± 0.01b370.7***
Magnesium22.8 ± 0.2a1.4 ± 0.01b1.5 ± 0.02c104.8***
Sodium20.04 ± 0.00b0.11 ± 0.00a0.11 ± 0.00a149.6***
Total phenolics240.8 ± 2.6a32.9 ± 1.58b38.6 ± 1.2ab4.7*
Lignin2273.3 ± 9.0b337.4 ± 5.5a302.6 ± 10.6b13.8***
Cellulose2159.1 ± 8.0b205 ± 4.2a150.8 ± 12.9b10.3**
Hemicellulose2274.2 ± 22.5a270.0 ± 16.2ab206.6 ± 10.4b4.7*
Water-soluble compounds2293.4 ± 12.1b187.6 ± 10.2c340.0 ± 7.1a60.9***
Specific leaf area2133.1 ± 0.4a51.5 ± 0.9c83.5 ± 2.2b690.7***
Water holding capacity2146.9 ± 1.0a137.2 ± 1.0b113.9 ± 1.03c285.5***
Table 2.

Initial leaf litter quality of each litter species: Q. pubescens, Q. ilex and P. halepensis, the values are mean ± SE (n = 5) and the results of the one-way ANOVA to test differences between initial litter species are indicated (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 and different letters denote significant differences among species with a>b>c.)

dfQ. pubescensQ. ilexP. halepensisF-ratio
Carbon2462.6 ± 2.65c478.1 ± 1.4b516.1 ± 1.6a198.80***
Nitrogen26.4 ± 0.2b9.6 ± 0.2a5.4 ± 0.1c146.30***
Phosphorus21.9 ± 0.1b3.5 ± 0.2a1.6 ± 0.1b64.6***
Calcium232.9 ± 0.8a25.1 ± 0.6b18.4 ± 0.2c168.1***
Potassium20.8 ± 0.01c1.8 ± 0.1a0.95 ± 0.01b370.7***
Magnesium22.8 ± 0.2a1.4 ± 0.01b1.5 ± 0.02c104.8***
Sodium20.04 ± 0.00b0.11 ± 0.00a0.11 ± 0.00a149.6***
Total phenolics240.8 ± 2.6a32.9 ± 1.58b38.6 ± 1.2ab4.7*
Lignin2273.3 ± 9.0b337.4 ± 5.5a302.6 ± 10.6b13.8***
Cellulose2159.1 ± 8.0b205 ± 4.2a150.8 ± 12.9b10.3**
Hemicellulose2274.2 ± 22.5a270.0 ± 16.2ab206.6 ± 10.4b4.7*
Water-soluble compounds2293.4 ± 12.1b187.6 ± 10.2c340.0 ± 7.1a60.9***
Specific leaf area2133.1 ± 0.4a51.5 ± 0.9c83.5 ± 2.2b690.7***
Water holding capacity2146.9 ± 1.0a137.2 ± 1.0b113.9 ± 1.03c285.5***
dfQ. pubescensQ. ilexP. halepensisF-ratio
Carbon2462.6 ± 2.65c478.1 ± 1.4b516.1 ± 1.6a198.80***
Nitrogen26.4 ± 0.2b9.6 ± 0.2a5.4 ± 0.1c146.30***
Phosphorus21.9 ± 0.1b3.5 ± 0.2a1.6 ± 0.1b64.6***
Calcium232.9 ± 0.8a25.1 ± 0.6b18.4 ± 0.2c168.1***
Potassium20.8 ± 0.01c1.8 ± 0.1a0.95 ± 0.01b370.7***
Magnesium22.8 ± 0.2a1.4 ± 0.01b1.5 ± 0.02c104.8***
Sodium20.04 ± 0.00b0.11 ± 0.00a0.11 ± 0.00a149.6***
Total phenolics240.8 ± 2.6a32.9 ± 1.58b38.6 ± 1.2ab4.7*
Lignin2273.3 ± 9.0b337.4 ± 5.5a302.6 ± 10.6b13.8***
Cellulose2159.1 ± 8.0b205 ± 4.2a150.8 ± 12.9b10.3**
Hemicellulose2274.2 ± 22.5a270.0 ± 16.2ab206.6 ± 10.4b4.7*
Water-soluble compounds2293.4 ± 12.1b187.6 ± 10.2c340.0 ± 7.1a60.9***
Specific leaf area2133.1 ± 0.4a51.5 ± 0.9c83.5 ± 2.2b690.7***
Water holding capacity2146.9 ± 1.0a137.2 ± 1.0b113.9 ± 1.03c285.5***

Litter mass loss

After 357 days of decomposition, litter mass loss was statistically different among sites and plant species with interaction effects (Table 3). On average, significantly higher mass loss occurred at Q. pubescens forest (36.94%) in comparison with Q. ilex forest (33.88%) and P. halepensis forest (33.80%). Regarding the litter, P. halepensis (36.81%) and Q. ilex (35.07%) lost significantly higher mass than Q. pubescens (32.72%). Concerning interactions, P. halepensis lost most of its mass at Q. pubescens and P. halepensis forests compared to the Q. ilex forest (Fig. 1A). No significant effect of rain exclusion was found on the litter mass loss (Table 3).

Table 3.

ANOVA table of F-Ratio and P-values for the effects of forest sites (S), litter species (L) and drought conditions (D) on the mass loss, microbial biomass (actinobacteria, bacteria and fungi) and actinobacteria/fungi (A/F) and bacteria/fungi (B/F) ratios.

Mass lossActino (A)Bacteria (B)Fungi (F)A/FB/F
dfFPFPFPFPFPFP
Sites (S)28.810.000833.92<0.00018.860.000330.38<0.00016.110.003011.78<0.0001
Litter species (L)28.110.002216.31<0.00014.580.01222.410.094553.55<0.000111.34<0.0001
Drought (D)13.700.05710.090.76021.910.16886.200.014312.080.000711.700.2828
SxL47.03<0.00015.690.000320.56<0.000121.01<0.00017.67<0.000111.49<0.0001
SxD20.430.64883.000.05397.250.00113.820.02510.180.83685.430.0056
LxD20.140.87243.830.02461.360.25931.120.33133.340.03920.110.8973
SxLxD40.100.98391.110.35402.720.03351.450.22292.120.08361.170.3293
Mass lossActino (A)Bacteria (B)Fungi (F)A/FB/F
dfFPFPFPFPFPFP
Sites (S)28.810.000833.92<0.00018.860.000330.38<0.00016.110.003011.78<0.0001
Litter species (L)28.110.002216.31<0.00014.580.01222.410.094553.55<0.000111.34<0.0001
Drought (D)13.700.05710.090.76021.910.16886.200.014312.080.000711.700.2828
SxL47.03<0.00015.690.000320.56<0.000121.01<0.00017.67<0.000111.49<0.0001
SxD20.430.64883.000.05397.250.00113.820.02510.180.83685.430.0056
LxD20.140.87243.830.02461.360.25931.120.33133.340.03920.110.8973
SxLxD40.100.98391.110.35402.720.03351.450.22292.120.08361.170.3293
Table 3.

ANOVA table of F-Ratio and P-values for the effects of forest sites (S), litter species (L) and drought conditions (D) on the mass loss, microbial biomass (actinobacteria, bacteria and fungi) and actinobacteria/fungi (A/F) and bacteria/fungi (B/F) ratios.

Mass lossActino (A)Bacteria (B)Fungi (F)A/FB/F
dfFPFPFPFPFPFP
Sites (S)28.810.000833.92<0.00018.860.000330.38<0.00016.110.003011.78<0.0001
Litter species (L)28.110.002216.31<0.00014.580.01222.410.094553.55<0.000111.34<0.0001
Drought (D)13.700.05710.090.76021.910.16886.200.014312.080.000711.700.2828
SxL47.03<0.00015.690.000320.56<0.000121.01<0.00017.67<0.000111.49<0.0001
SxD20.430.64883.000.05397.250.00113.820.02510.180.83685.430.0056
LxD20.140.87243.830.02461.360.25931.120.33133.340.03920.110.8973
SxLxD40.100.98391.110.35402.720.03351.450.22292.120.08361.170.3293
Mass lossActino (A)Bacteria (B)Fungi (F)A/FB/F
dfFPFPFPFPFPFP
Sites (S)28.810.000833.92<0.00018.860.000330.38<0.00016.110.003011.78<0.0001
Litter species (L)28.110.002216.31<0.00014.580.01222.410.094553.55<0.000111.34<0.0001
Drought (D)13.700.05710.090.76021.910.16886.200.014312.080.000711.700.2828
SxL47.03<0.00015.690.000320.56<0.000121.01<0.00017.67<0.000111.49<0.0001
SxD20.430.64883.000.05397.250.00113.820.02510.180.83685.430.0056
LxD20.140.87243.830.02461.360.25931.120.33133.340.03920.110.8973
SxLxD40.100.98391.110.35402.720.03351.450.22292.120.08361.170.3293

Microbial abundance and structure

Abundances of actinobacteria, total bacteria and fungi differed significantly according to forest sites, when control and amplified drought conditions were combined (Table 3, Fig. 1) The highest abundances of all microbial groups were observed at P. halepensis forest and lowest at Q. ilex forest. However, it differed according to plant litter species producing a site x species interaction effect (Table 3; Fig. 1). Actinobacteria and total bacteria had the highest abundance in Q. ilex litter and lowest in P. halepensis at Q. ilex and P. halepensis forests, respectively (Fig. 1B and C). Roughly, higher abundance of fungi was observed in P. halepensis litter at Q. pubescens forest, Q. ilex litter at Q. ilex forest and Q. pubescens litter at P. halepensis forest (Fig. 1D). Regarding the actinobacteria to fungi (A/F) ratio, it was significantly higher in Q. pubescens and Q. ilex litter and lower in P. halepensis litter at Q. pubescens and Q. ilex forests (Fig. 1E). Total bacteria to fungi (B/F) ratio was significantly higher in Q. ilex litter and lowest in P. halepensis litter, at Q. ilex and P. halepensis forests (Fig. 1F).

Overall, there was a significant increase of fungal abundance and a decrease of A/F ratio under amplified drought (AD) in comparison with natural conditions (Table 3). No main effect of drought conditions was observed for actinobacteria, total bacteria and bacteria to fungi (B/F) ratio (Table 3). However, an interaction effect was observed between site and drought conditions for total bacteria, fungi and total bacteria to fungi ratio (Table 3; see Supplementary Table 1, Supporting Information). Thus, we observed a significant increase of total bacterial (Fig. 2A) and fungal abundance (Fig. 2B) under AD conditions at the P. halepensis forest, and a decrease of B/F ratio in Q. pubescens forest (Fig. 2C).

Effects of the two drought conditions (ND = natural drought: AD = amplified drought) on the total bacterial (A), fungal (B) abundances and bacteria to fungi ratio (C). Barplots are mean ± SE. Significant effects are indicated with respective symbols * for P < 0.05 and ** for P < 0.01. Qp = Q. pubescens, Qi = Quercus ilex, Ph = P. halepensis.
Figure 2.

Effects of the two drought conditions (ND = natural drought: AD = amplified drought) on the total bacterial (A), fungal (B) abundances and bacteria to fungi ratio (C). Barplots are mean ± SE. Significant effects are indicated with respective symbols * for P < 0.05 and ** for P < 0.01. Qp = Q. pubescens, Qi = Quercus ilex, Ph = P. halepensis.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we evaluated how reduction of rainfall and change in plant species may affect belowground microbial community's abundance and structure and consequently the litter decomposition process in three dominant Mediterranean forests of southern France. Our findings are that (i) actinobacteria and total bacteria were more affected by changes of plant species than by the decrease of water availability; (ii) fungi were positively impacted by the reduction of rainfall and (iii) the future arrival of P. halepensis litter to Q. pubescens and Q. ilex forest and rainfall reduction could alter the relative proportion of fungi and bacteria in the community hence having implication in microbial decomposers activity.

Effects of litter quality on microbial communities and mass loss

Our results showed the importance of leaf litter initial litter with respect to microbial composition and litter mass loss dynamics. We observed higher abundance of actinobacteria and total bacteria in oak litter than in pine. This is in line with previous studies, which showed a preference of bacteria for high quality litter (i.e. low C/N, C/P, lignin: P and lignin/N ratio) (Hodge, Robinson and Fitter 2000; De Boer et al. 2005 ; Romaní et al. 2006). Both oaks Q. pubescens and Q. ilex are characterised by high N and P content, which are efficiently utilised by bacterial enzymes (Romani et al. 2006) and then are consistently considered key factors in litter decomposition and good predictors of litter mass loss (Moro and Domingo 2000; Garcia-Pausas, Casals and Romanya 2004; Güsewell and Gessner 2009). However, our results only partially corroborate with this by showing that Q. ilex and P. halepensis litter had higher mass loss than Q. pubescens. That is possibly due to higher initial content of total phenolics determined in Q. pubescens compared to Q. ilex, which are known to inhibit litter microbial communities and N mineralisation, during the early stage of decomposition (Lambers 1993; Souto, Chiapusio and Pellissier 2000; Ormeño et al. 2006; Chomel et al. 2014). This may explain the lower mass loss of its litter in comparison with Q. ilex and P. halepensis. The high mass loss of P. halepensis litter may be also explained by the leaching of high content of water-soluble compounds (Tripathi and Singh 1992; Kaushal et al. 2012) and high Na content (Gressel et al. 1995), which both are known to positive correlated litter decay. Gressel et al. (1995) observed that salt accumulation in P. halepensis needles enhanced their breakdown compared to Q. coccifera leaves in a typical Mediterranean mixed woodland.

Effects of litter-site interaction on litter decomposition processes

The influence of plant species on litter decomposition varied according to the forest sites as shown by strong litter-site interaction. At Q. pubescens forest, we observed the highest abundance of fungi associated with P. halepensis litter, associated to a reduction of the A/F ratio. This is consistent with the findings by Hodge et al. (2000) and Wardle et al. (2004) who showed that fungi are favoured by litter with high C/N ratio. In addition, fungi are rather considered specialists and are more equipped enzymatically to assimilate recalcitrant material than more generalist bacteria (Møller, Miller and Kjøller 1999; Romaní et al. 2006). The high abundance of total bacteria observed in P. halepensis litter may be explained by the synergistic relationship between bacteria and fungi because bacteria may benefit by the presence of fungi, which may provide them resources that bacteria were not able to acquire on their own (Romaní et al. 2006). At Q. ilex forest, microorganisms were more numerous with Q. ilex litter in comparison with the two other species, which suggests the high specificity of decomposers for decomposing the autochthonous litter in this forest (Ayres et al. 2009). However, this difference in microbial abundance did not lead to a significant difference in mass loss of Q. ilex litter in its own forest compared to the two other forests. This may due to the presence of decomposers able to use different sources of carbon. Decomposers can also develop preferences for some resources they are not used to (St John et al. 2011). Taking into account the three litter species, our results showed that P. halepensis forest had generally higher microbial abundance (actinobacteria, total bacteria and fungi) than other sites, possibly because this is the only mixed woodland out of the three studied forests and it was demonstrated that an increase of plant diversity promotes litter microbial growth (Chapman and Newman 2010; Santonja et al. 2017). Indeed, litter dissimilarity may decrease resource competition between functional groups and thus increase the abundance, activity, and hence efficiency of decomposers (Barbe et al. 2017).

Effects of rainfall reduction on litter mass loss and microbial community

Contrary to our expectations, amplified drought conditions (AD) had no effect on litter mass loss after 1 year of decomposition. This may be explained by the extremely dry year during which the study was performed (Saunier et al. 2018). Actinobacteria were not directly affected by AD conditions, contrary to previous studies (Bouskill et al. 2013; Felsmann et al. 2015). Nevertheless, a reduction in the A/F ratio was observed, probably due to the positive effect of AD conditions on fungal abundance. The increase of fungal abundance under drier conditions was also observed in other Mediterranean forests (Hawkes et al. 2011; Sherman, Sternberg and Steinberger 2012; Allison et al. 2013; Alster et al. 2013). It is well recognised that fungi are more resistant to drought than bacteria (De Vries and Shade 2013; Guhr et al. 2015) and might get competitive advantage over bacteria during dry periods (Six 2012; Yuste et al. 2011). Moreover, the expansion of fungal hyphae reported by some studies under drought periods (Allison et al. 2013; Zeglin et al. 2013) may result from the reduction of predatory pressure (i.e. grazers activity or number) under water stressed conditions (Davet 2004 ; Bapiri, Bååth and Rousk 2010; Barnard, Osborne and Firestone 2013). The observed decrease of the A/F ratio under AD conditions in Q. pubescens litter was possibly related to the persistence of phenolics due to the decrease of leaching processes under AD conditions, which delayed microbial colonisation by decomposers in that litter (Chomel et al. 2014). Contrary to fungi, total bacteria were not affected by changes in drought conditions. Bacterial biomass stability under drought was also observed by Hartmann et al. (2017), and it was explained by independence of bacteria on water film for dispersal (Mohammadipanah and Wink 2016). Nevertheless, those results varied according to forest site and litter type. For example, in the P. halepensis forest, an increase of total bacteria biomass was observed under AD conditions, which may be explained by (i) natural selection of the most drought-tolerant bacterial groups (Barnard, Osborne and Firestone 2013) and/or (ii) bacteria resilience to drought resulting from their predominating r-selected life strategy, which enables rapid recovery after a period of disturbance (i.e. drought) (Barnard, Osborne and Firestone 2013; Meisner, Rousk and Bååth 2015).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that microbial litter decomposers respond differently to intensification of water stress conditions in the Mediterranean forests. Actinobacteria and total bacteria were more negatively affected by plant litter changes (Q. ilex and Q. pubescens higher than P. halepensis) than by the direct rainfall reduction. In contrary, fungal communities seemed to be more tolerant and even favored to water limitation. Also, the potential resilience of bacterial communities was proposed, while fungal response seemed to reflect a higher degree of adaptation to decreased water availability. Finally, the arrival of P. halepensis litter to a Q. pubescens and Q. ilex forest may change litter microbial communities, leading to a decrease of A/F and B/F ratios and promoting fungi and certain groups of bacteria, which are more capable of using complex carbon sources. Therefore, the intensification of drought conditions in Mediterranean forest may introduce a fungi dominated community over bacteria, by either the capability of degrading more recalcitrant litter or/and tolerance to future climate conditions.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank all the people that contributed in the set-up of the experiment and in the field campaigns especially to Sylvie Dupouyet, Jean-Philippe Orts and Jean-Marc Ourcival. We thank to Anne Haguenauer from Endoume Marine Station (Marseille, France) for her efficient orientation in the lab and whole team of CRI—Crop Research Institute (Prague, Czech Republic)—for their unconditional help and support. The three experimental sites were annually supported by the research infrastructure AnaEE-France (ANR-11-INBS-0001) and by Allenvi through the SOERE F-ORE-T. We acknowledge the se of the COOPERATE database (Reiter IM, Castagnoli G, Rotereau A 2015 "Cooperate database", https://cooperate.obs-hp.fr/db) run by the CNRS FR3098 ECCOREV and OSU-Pytheas with support from the Labex OT-Med . We also thank the French Region PACA and Europe for the PhD grant attributed to Susana Pereira.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

SP, MM and VB wrote the manuscript. VB and CF conceived and designed the experiments. SP, AB, AA, and PM performed the experiments. SP, JK, MM, and VB analysed the data.

FUNDING

This research was financially supported by the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) with the project SecPriMe2 (ANR-12-BSV7–0016-01), the BioDivMeX Mistrals program and partially by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, European Regional Development Fund-Project No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000845 and grant No. LTC17075 and Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, institutional support MZE-RO0418.

This work is a contribution to Labex OT-Med (ANR-11-LABX-0061) and has received funding from Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University—A*MIDEX, a French ‘Investissements d'Avenir’ programme.

Conflict of interest None declared.

REFERENCES

Acosta-Martinez
V
,
Cotton
J
,
Gardner
T
et al. .
Predominant bacterial and fungal assemblages in agricultural soils during a record drought/heat wave and linkages to enzyme activities of biogeochemical cycling
.
Appl Soil Ecol
.
2014
;
84
:
69
82
.

Allison
SD
,
Lu
Y
,
Weihe
C
et al. .
Microbial abundance and composition influence litter decomposition response to environmental change
.
Ecology
.
2013
;
94
:
714
25
.

Alster
CJ
,
German
DP
,
Lu
Y
et al. .
Microbial enzymatic responses to drought and to nitrogen addition in a southern California grassland
.
Soil Biol Biochem
.
2013
;
64
:
68
79
.

Anandan
R
,
Dharumadurai
D
,
Manogaran
GP
.
An introduction to actinobacteria
. In:
Actinobacteria - Basics and Biotechnological Applications
.
Intech
,
2016
.

Ayres
E
,
Steltzer
H
,
Berg
S
et al. .
Soil biota accelerate decomposition in high‐elevation forests by specializing in the breakdown of litter produced by the plant species above them
.
J Ecol
.
2009
;
97
:
901
12
.

Bapiri
A
,
Bååth
E
,
Rousk
J
.
Drying–rewetting cycles affect fungal and bacterial growth differently in an arable soil
.
Microb ecol
.
2010
;
60
:
419
28
.

Barbe
L
,
Jung
V
,
Prinzing
A
et al. .
Functionally dissimilar neighbors accelerate litter decomposition in two grass species
.
New Phytologist
.
2017
;
214
:
1092
102
.

Barbero
M
,
Bonin
G
,
Loisel
R
et al. .
Changes and disturbances of forest ecosystems caused by human activities in the western part of the mediterranean basin
.
Vegetatio
.
1990
;
87
;
151
73
.

Barnard
RL
,
Osborne
CA
,
Firestone
MK
.
Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting
.
The ISME journal
.
2013
;
7
:
2229
.

Bertrand
R
,
Lenoir
J
,
Piedallu
C
et al. .
Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forests
.
Nature
.
2011
;
479
:
517
.

Bouskill
NJ
,
Lim
HC
,
Borglin
S
et al. .
Pre-exposure to drought increases the resistance of tropical forest soil bacterial communities to extended drought
.
The ISME journal
.
2013
;
7
:
384
.

Chapman
SK
,
Newman
GS
.
Biodiversity at the plant–soil interface: microbial abundance and community structure respond to litter mixing
.
Oecologia
.
2010
;
162
:
763
9
.

Chomel
M
,
Fernandez
C
,
Bousquet‐Mélou
A
et al. .
Secondary metabolites of Pinus halepensis alter decomposer organisms and litter decomposition during afforestation of abandoned agricultural zones
.
J Ecol
.
2014
;
102
:
411
24
.

Cleveland
CC
,
Reed
SC
,
Keller
AB
et al. .
Litter quality versus soil microbial community controls over decomposition: a quantitative analysis
.
Oecologia
.
2014
;
174
:
283
94
.

Davet
P
.
Microbial Ecology of Soil and Plant Growth
. Boca Raton:
CRC Press
,
2004
.

De Boer
W
,
Folman
LB
,
Summerbell
RC
et al. .
Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development
.
FEMS Microbiol Rev
.
2005
;
29
:
795
811
.

De Vries
FT
,
Shade
A
.
Controls on soil microbial community stability under climate change
.
Front microbiol
.
2013
;
4
:
265
.

Dorn-In
S
,
Bassitta
R
,
Schwaiger
K
et al. .
Specific amplification of bacterial DNA by optimized so-called universal bacterial primers in samples rich of plant DNA
.
J microbiol meth
.
2015
;
113
:
50
6
.

Felsmann
K
,
Baudis
M
,
Gimbel
K
et al. .
Soil bacterial community structure responses to precipitation reduction and forest management in forest ecosystems across Germany
.
PLOS ONE
.
2015
;
10
:
e0122539
.

Fierer
N
,
Bradford
MA
,
Jackson
RB
.
Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria
.
Ecology
.
2007
;
88
:
1354
64
.

Folin
O
,
Denis
WA
.
Colorimetric method for the determination of phenols (and phenol derivatives) in urine
.
J Biol Chem
.
1915
;
22.2
:
305
8
.

Fortunel
C
,
Garnier
E
,
Joffre
R
et al. .
Leaf traits capture the effects of land use changes and climate on litter decomposability of grasslands across Europe
.
Ecology
.
2009
;
90
:
598
611
.

Fredriksson
NJ
,
Hermansson
M
,
Wilén
B-M
.
The choice of PCR primers has great impact on assessments of bacterial community diversity and dynamics in a wastewater treatment plant
.
PLOS ONE
.
2013
;
8
:
e76431
.

Garcia-Pausas
J
,
Casals
P
,
Romanya
J
.
Litter decomposition and faunal activity in Mediterranean forest soils: effects of N content and the moss layer
.
Soil Biol Biochem
.
2004
;
36
:
989
97
.

Garcia-Pausas
J
,
Paterson
E
.
Microbial community abundance and structure are determinants of soil organic matter mineralisation in the presence of labile carbon
.
Soil Biol Biochem
.
2011
;
43
:
1705
13
.

Gessner
MO
,
Swan
CM
,
Dang
CK
et al. .
Diversity meets decomposition
.
Trends ecol evol
.
2010
;
25
:
372
80
.

Gholz
HL
,
Wedin
DA
,
Smitherman
SM
et al. .
Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition
.
Glob Change Biol
.
2000
;
6
:
751
65
.

Giorgi
F
,
Lionello
P
.
Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region
.
Global Planet Change
.
2008
;
63
:
90
104
.

Gressel
N
,
Inbar
Y
,
Singer
A
et al. .
Chemical and spectroscopic properties of leaf litter and decomposed organic matter in the Carmel Range, Israel
.
Soil Biol Biochem
.
1995
;
27
:
23
31
.

Guhr
A
,
Borken
W
,
Spohn
M
et al. .
Redistribution of soil water by a saprotrophic fungus enhances carbon mineralization
.
P Natl A Sci
.
2015
;
112
:
14647
51
.

Guiot
J
,
Cramer
W
.
Climate change: the 2015 paris agreement thresholds and Mediterranean basin ecosystems
.
Science
.
2016
;
354
:
465
8
.

Güsewell
S
,
Gessner
MO
.
N:P ratios influence litter decomposition and colonization by fungi and bacteria in microcosms
.
Funct Ecol
.
2009
;
23
:
211
9
.

Hartmann
M
,
Brunner
I
,
Hagedorn
F
et al. .
A decade of irrigation transforms the soil microbiome of a semi‐arid pine forest
.
Mol ecol
.
2017
;
26
:
1190
206
.

Hawkes
CV
,
Kivlin
SN
,
Rocca
JD
et al. .
Fungal community responses to precipitation
.
Glob Change Biol
.
2011
;
17
:
1637
45
.

Hertig
E
,
Tramblay
Y
.
Regional downscaling of Mediterranean droughts under past and future climatic conditions
.
Global Planet Change
.
2017
;
151
:
36
48
.

Hodge
A
,
Robinson
D
,
Fitter
A
.
Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing for nitrogen?
Trends plant sci
.
2000
;
5
:
304
8
.

Hättenschwiler
S
,
Jørgensen
HB
.
Carbon quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition in a tropical rain forest
.
J Ecol
.
2010
;
98
:
754
63
.

IPCC
.
Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis
.
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
,
2014
.

Kaushal
R
,
Verma
KS
,
Chaturvedi
OP
et al. .
Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four multipurpose tree species
.
Range Manag Agrofor
.
2012
;
33
:
20
7
.

Klindworth
A
,
Pruesse
E
,
Schweer
T
et al. .
Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies
.
Nucleic acids res
.
2013
;
41
:
e1
e1
.

Lambers
H
.
Rising CO2, secondary plant metabolism, plant-herbivore interactions and litter decomposition
. In:
CO2 and Biosphere
. Dordrecht:
Springer
,
1993
,
263
71
.

Lewin
GR
,
Carlos
C
,
Chevrette
MG
et al. .
Evolution and ecology of Actinobacteria and their bioenergy applications
.
Annu rev microbiol
.
2016
;
70
:
235
54
.

Limousin
JM
,
Rambal
S
,
Ourcival
JM
et al. .
Modelling rainfall interception in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex ecosystem: lesson from a throughfall exclusion experiment
.
J Hydrol
.
2008
;
357
:
57
66
.

Lunghini
D
,
Granito
VM
,
Di Lonardo
DP
et al. .
Fungal diversity of saprotrophic litter fungi in a Mediterranean maquis environment
.
Mycologia
.
2013
;
105
:
1499
515
.

Manzoni
S
,
Schimel
JP
,
Porporato
A
.
Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta-analysis
.
Ecology
.
2012
;
93
:
930
8
.

McCarthy
AJ
,
Williams
ST
.
Actinomycetes as agents of biodegradation in the environment: a review
.
Gene
.
1992
;
115
:
189
92
.

Meisner
A
,
Rousk
J
,
Bååth
E
.
Prolonged drought changes the bacterial growth response to rewetting
.
Soil Biol Biochem
.
2015
;
88
:
314
22
.

Mohammadipanah
F
,
Wink
J
.
Actinobacteria from arid and desert habitats: diversity and biological activity
.
Front microbiol
.
2016
;
6
:
1541
.

Morales
P
,
Hickler
T
,
Rowell
DP
et al. .
Changes in European ecosystem productivity and carbon balance driven by regional climate model output
.
Global Change Biol
.
2007
;
13
:
108
22
.

Moro
MJ
,
Domingo
F
.
Litter decomposition in four woody species in a Mediterranean climate: weight loss, N and P dynamics
.
Ann Bot
.
2000
;
86
:
1065
71
.

Møller
J
,
Miller
M
,
Kjøller
A
.
Fungal–bacterial interaction on beech leaves: influence on decomposition and dissolved organic carbon quality
.
Soil Biol Biochem
.
1999
;
31
:
367
74
.

Ogaya
R
,
Peñuelas
J
.
Tree growth, mortality, and above-ground biomass accumulation in a holm oak forest under a five-year experimental field drought
.
Plant Ecol
.
2007
;
189
:
291
9
.

Okoro
CK
,
Brown
R
,
Jones
AL
et al. .
Diversity of culturable actinomycetes in hyper-arid soils of the Atacama Desert, Chile
.
Anton van Lee
.
2009
;
95
:
121
33
.

Ormeño
E
,
Baldy
V
,
Ballini
C
et al. .
Effects of environmental factors and leaf chemistry on leaf litter colonization by fungi in a Mediterranean shrubland
.
Pedobiologia
.
2006
;
50
:
1
10
.

Peñuelas
J
,
Estiarte
M
,
Kimball
BA
et al. .
Variety of responses of plant phenolic concentration to CO 2 enrichment
.
J Exp Bot
.
1996
;
47
:
1463
7
.

Peñuelas
J
,
Rico
L
,
Ogaya
R
et al. .
Summer season and long-term drought increase the richness of bacteria and fungi in the foliar phyllosphere of Quercus ilex in a mixed Mediterranean forest
.
Plant Biol
.
2012
;
14
:
565
75
.

Pfeiffer
S
,
Pastar
M
,
Mitter
B
et al. .
Improved group-specific primers based on the full SILVA 16S rRNA gene reference database
.
Environ Microbiol
.
2014
;
16
:
2389
407
.

Rastogi
G
,
Tech
JJ
,
Coaker
GL
et al. .
A PCR-based toolbox for the culture-independent quantification of total bacterial abundances in plant environments
.
J Microbiol Meth
.
2010
;
83
:
127
32
.

R Core Team
.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
.
2017
. https://www.R-project.org/

Romaní
AM
,
Fischer
H
,
Mille-Lindblom
C
et al. .
Interactions of bacteria and fungi on decomposing litter: differential extracellular enzyme activities
.
Ecology
.
2006
;
87
:
2559
69
.

Sagova-Mareckova
M
,
Omelka
M
,
Cermak
L
et al. .
Microbial communities show parallels at sites with distinct litter and soil characteristics
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
.
2011
;
77
:
7560
7
.

Santonja
M
,
Baldy
V
,
Fernandez
C
et al. .
Potential shift in plant communities with climate change: outcome on litter decomposition and nutrient release in a Mediterranean oak forest
.
Ecosystems
.
2015b
;
18
:
1253
68
.

Santonja
M
,
Fernandez
C
,
Gauquelin
T
et al. .
Climate change effects on litter decomposition: intensive drought leads to a strong decrease of litter mixture interactions
.
Plant and Soil
.
2015a
;
393
:
69
8
.

Santonja
M
,
Rancon
A
,
Fromin
N
et al. .
Plant litter diversity increases microbial abundance, fungal diversity, and carbon and nitrogen cycling in a Mediterranean shrubland
.
Soil Biol Biochem
.
2017
;
111
:
124
34
.

Saunier
A
,
Ormeño
E
,
Havaux
M
et al. .
Resistance of native oak to recurrent drought conditions simulating predicted climatic changes in the Mediterranean region
.
Plant Cell Environ
.
2018
;
41
:
2299
312
.

Schimel
J
,
Balser
TC
,
Wallenstein
M
.
Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function
.
Ecology
.
2007
;
88
:
1386
94
.

Sherman
C
,
Sternberg
M
,
Steinberger
Y
.
Effects of climate change on soil respiration and carbon processing in Mediterranean and semi-arid regions: an experimental approach
.
Eur J Soil Biol
.
2012
;
52
:
48
58
.

Six
J
.
Fungal friends against drought
.
Nat Clim Change
.
2012
;
2
:
234
5
.

Souto
XC
,
Chiapusio
G
,
Pellissier
F
.
Relationships between phenolics and soil microorganisms in spruce forests: significance for natural regeneration
.
J Chem Ecol
.
2000
;
26
:
2025
34
.

St. John
MG
,
Orwin
KH
,
Dickie
IA
.
No “home” versus “away” effects of de-composition found in a grassland–forest reciprocal litter transplant study
.
Soil Biol Biochem
.
2011
;
43
:
1482
9
.

Strickland
MS
,
Lauber
C
,
Fierer
N
et al. .
Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition
.
Ecology
.
2009
;
90
:
441
51
.

Swift
MJ
,
Heal
OW
,
Anderson
JM
et al. .
Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
. Berkeley:
University of California Press
,
1979
.

Tripathi
SK
,
Singh
KP
.
Nutrient immobilization and release patterns during plant decomposition in a dry tropical bamboo savanna, India
.
Biol Fert Soils
.
1992
;
14
;
191
9
.

Vainio
EJ
,
Hantula
J
.
Direct analysis of wood-inhabiting fungi using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of amplified ribosomal DNA
.
Mycol Res
.
2000
;
104
:
927
36
.

Van Soest
PJ
,
Wine
RH
.
Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds: IV. Dtermination of plant cell-wall constituents
.
J of official analytical chemists
.
1967
;
50
:
50
5
.

Wardle
DA
,
Bardgett
RD
,
Klironomos
JN
et al. .
Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota
.
Science
.
2004
;
304
:
1629
33
.

Wardle
DA
,
Van der Putten
WH
.
Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and above-ground-below-ground linkages
.
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives
.
2002
.

Xu
X
,
Thornton
PE
,
Post
WM
.
A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems
.
Global Ecol Biogeogr
.
2013
;
22
:
737
49
.

Yuste
JC
,
Peñuelas
J
,
Estiarte
M
et al. .
Drought-resistant fungi control soil organic matter decomposition and its response to temperature
.
Global Change Biol
.
2011
;
17
:
1475
86
.

Zeglin
LH
,
Bottomley
PJ
,
Jumpponen
A
et al. .
Altered precipitation regime affects the function and composition of soil microbial communities on multiple time scales
.
Ecology
.
2013
;
94
:
2334
45
.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data