Abstract

Aims

Our objective was to compare the efficacy of pre-treatment with different classes of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing electrical cardioversion.

Methods and results

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different AADs in patients with AF undergoing electrical cardioversion. We grouped AADs into five network nodes: no treatment or rate control, Class Ia, Class Ic, Class III, and amiodarone. Outcomes were (i) acute restoration and (ii) maintenance of sinus rhythm. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until June 2020. We used Python 3.8.3 and R 3.6.2 for data analysis. We evaluated the overall certainty of evidence with the GRADE framework. We included 28 RCTs. Compared with no treatment or rate control, Class III AADs [odds ratio (OR): 2.41; 95% credible interval (CrI): 1.37 to 4.62, high certainty] and amiodarone (OR: 2.58; 95% CrI: 1.54 to 4.37, high certainty) improved restoration of sinus rhythm. Amiodarone improved long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm when compared with no treatment or rate control (OR: 5.37; 95% CrI: 4.00–7.39, high certainty), Class Ic (OR: 1.89; 95% CrI: 1.05–3.45, moderate certainty) and Class III AADs (OR: 2.19; 95% CrI: 1.39–3.26, high certainty).

Conclusion

Before electrical cardioversion of AF, treatment with Class III AADs or amiodarone improves the acute restoration of sinus rhythm. Amiodarone is most likely to improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion, but Class Ic and Class III AADs are also effective.

What’s new?
  • In addition to pre-treatment with amiodarone, treatment with Class III anti-arrhythmic drugs before electrical cardioversion improves the acute restoration of sinus rhythm with high certainty. Our network meta-analysis expands on published evidence regarding the efficacy of amiodarone before electrical cardioversion.

  • According to a network model using all published randomized controlled trials data, amiodarone, Class Ic and Class III AADs improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion.

  • Amiodarone, however, is more likely than Class Ic and Class III AADs to improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Introduction

When clinicians select a rhythm control strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), they often perform electrical cardioversion.1 Electrical cardioversion restores sinus rhythm in up to 87% of patients although in some populations the success rate is as low as 67%.2–6 Even when sinus rhythm is restored, the AF recurrence rate is high—ranging between 57 and 63% within 4 weeks.2,7

Clinicians may treat patients with anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) before electrical cardioversion of AF to improve the acute restoration and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm.8,9 Based on level ‘B’ evidence, the European Society of Cardiology provides a Class IIa recommendation to consider select AADs for treatment before electrical cardioversion in patients with recurrent AF.10

We previously completed a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis which found high certainty evidence that amiodarone improves the maintenance of sinus rhythm following electrical cardioversion by 20% in the acute setting and 4.4 times over a follow-up period of up to 13 months.11 Despite this, practice remains variable. If an AAD is used, the optimal agent remains uncertain.9

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of treatment with an AAD before (and possibly after) electrical cardioversion for patients with AF. Using a Bayesian framework, we systematically compiled the existing evidence into a single analytic model.12

Methods

We registered the protocol (PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017068877) and pre-specified our search strategy, criteria for study selection, statistical methodology, and approach to evaluating the risk of bias and grading the certainty of evidence.

Search strategy

We performed a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2020 using a strategy designed with input from a research librarian (see Supplementary material online, Appendix S7). We searched clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTRP for ongoing or unpublished trials and reviewed the conference proceedings of the last two meetings of the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology. We consulted experts to identify other relevant studies.

Eligibility criteria

We included RCTs without language constraints. We included studies of adult patients with AF of any duration undergoing elective electrical cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm. We included RCTs enrolling patients with atrial flutter if they comprised <50% of the population. The intervention of interest was treatment with an AAD via any administration route. We included trials with any comparator, including no treatment, rate control, or placebo. We only included medications approved for use in Canada or the United States. The outcomes of interest were the acute restoration and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm during follow-up.

Study selection

We uploaded all titles and abstracts from the electronic search into RefWorks (ProQuest, United States) and Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation, Australia). Two reviewers independently performed title and abstract screening followed by full-text eligibility assessment. We resolved conflicts by consensus.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Independently and in duplicate, review authors used pre-defined data collection forms to extract data from included studies. Whenever possible, we applied intention-to-treat analysis using the number of participants randomized to a study arm as the total denominator. We assumed the worst-case scenario—i.e. we assumed participants who were lost to follow-up or withdrew consent for any reason to be in AF. We also applied an intention-to-cardiovert analysis. Patients who converted to sinus rhythm prior to electrical cardioversion were considered to have successfully cardioverted.

We used the Cochrane tool to evaluate the risk of bias for individual studies for each outcome.13 We pre-specified that open label trials would be at low risk of performance bias if they followed a systematic protocol for electrical cardioversion and administration of additional AADs. We pre-specified that blinding would not influence detection bias, as sinus rhythm is an objective outcome. We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each comparison and each outcome using the GRADE framework.14

Statistical analysis

We grouped the interventions into five distinct network nodes according to mechanism of action (Vaughan Williams classification): (i) no treatment or rate control (i.e. calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, digoxin), (ii) Class Ia, (iii) Class Ic, (iv) Class III and (v) amiodarone.

We performed pairwise meta-analysis using Python (version 3.8.3; packages ‘matplotlib’, ‘numpy’ and ‘pandas’) and NMA using R (version 3.5.1; packages ‘gemtc’ and ‘rjags’).15

We calculated direct estimates using a frequentist random effects framework. For each direct comparison, we reported the odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We used a Bayesian model with random effects to perform our NMA. We calculated direct and indirect estimates for each treatment comparison and reported the combined ORs and 95% credible intervals (CrIs)—the Bayesian equivalent of CIs.12 We used vague, non-informative prior distributions, and generated the posterior distribution with four chains of 40 000 iterations and a thin of 10.

We calculated the probability of each treatment being ranked best, second-best, third-best, and so on by comparing each treatment with the no treatment or rate control group. We derived these probabilities using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).12

We assessed between-study heterogeneity in two steps.16 First, we calculated the global I2 statistic for direct comparisons and network consistency, and used node-splitting to assess coherence between direct and indirect estimates. For the node-splitting comparisons, we pre-specified a P-value of <0.05 on the z-test to evaluate incoherence. Second, we assessed the forest plots visually to compare the CIs of direct estimates with the CrIs of network estimates.17

Results

Of an initial 3367 citations, we reviewed the full text of 71 studies and included 28 RCTs with 4348 participants (see Supplementary material online, Appendix S1). We included 24 two-arm and 4 three-arm RCTs. Table 1 presents the characteristics of included studies (also see Supplementary material online, Appendix S2). The mean age as reported in 28 studies was 63 years; mean duration of AF before electrical cardioversion was 304 days (reported in 24 trials); mean LA size was 45 mm (reported in 23 trials). Boos and et al.18 excluded patients with cardioversion in the previous 6 months, and three trials only included patients with recent-onset AF.19–21 Two trials only included patients without a history of unsuccessful electrical cardioversion.22,23

Table 1

Characteristics of included studies.

StudyDesignSettingNumber of patientsCardioversionArmsFollow-upRisk of bias (acute | maintenance)
Bianconi et al. 199630Single blindSingle centre100
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks in increasing energy levels (100J, 200J, 300J) until delivery of two 300J shocks

Propafenone: pre-cardioversion, three daily doses of 300 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg for 48 h; post-cardioversion, ongoing propafenone therapyN/AUnclear
Matching placebo
Boos et al. 200418UnblindedSingle centre35
  • External cardioversion

  • Five synchronized monophasic shocks (anterior-anterior: 200J, 360J, and 360J; then, anterior-posterior: 360J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 1 week of 200 mg PO three times daily; post-cardioversion, 3 weeks of 200 mg PO three times daily for 1 week, followed by 200 mg PO twice daily for 1 week, followed by 200 mg PO daily for 1 week16 monthsUnclear | high
No treatment
Capucci 200031UnblindedSingle centre92
  • External cardioversion

  • Seven synchronized shocks (50J, 100J, 150J, 200J, 250J, 300J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 1 month of 400 mg PO daily; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily2 monthsUnclear | high
Glucose-insulin-potassium solution: pre-cardioversion, continuous infusion for 24 h prior to cardioversion
No treatment
Channer et al. 200428Double blindMulti-centre161
  • External cardioversion

  • Five anterolateral synchronized shocks (100J, 200J, 360J, 360J, and 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, one additional anterolateral 360J shock

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO twice daily for 2 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO once daily for 8 weeks followed by matching placebo for 44 weeks52 weeksHigh | high
Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO twice daily for 2 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO once daily for 52 weeks
Matching placebo
Climent et al. 200432Double blindSingle centre54
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized successive shocks (200J, 300J, and 360J) until technical success or delivery of two 360J shocks

Flecainide: pre-cardioversion, 2 mg/kg IV over 30 min1 monthHigh | high
Matching placebo
De Simone et al. 200333UnblindedMulti-centre162
  • External cardioversion

  • Up to three synchronized external monophasic shocks (200J, 300J, and 360 J)

  • If unsuccessful, internal cardioversion via biphasic shocks in increasing energy levels (5J, 10J, and 30J) until restoration of sinus rhythm

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 600 mg PO daily for 7 days, followed by 400 mg PO daily for 7 days, then 200 mg PO daily for 14 days3 monthsUnclear | high
Flecainide: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily for 3 days
Galperin et al. 200134Double blindMulti-centre95
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 200J and two more shocks of 360J if necessary

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 600 mg PO daily for at least 4 weeks, then 200 mg PO daily16 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Hartel et al. 197435Double blindSingle centre52
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 100W, followed by 200W and 300W if necessary

Disopyramide: pre-cardioversion, 100 mg PO three times daily starting the day before cardioversion; post-cardioversion, 500 mg PO daily (in 3 doses) for maintenance3 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Hillestad et al. 197236UnblindedSingle centre124
  • Direct-current cardioversion

Quinidine sulphate: pre-cardioversion, 0.2 g PO twice daily until serum quinidine level of between 4 and 6 mg/LN/AUnclear
No treatment
Jacobs et al. 199837Not specifiedSingle centre100
  • Direct-current cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks at increasing energy levels (50J, 100J, 200J, 360J and 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, the subject was crossed over to the other therapy for another attempt at cardioversion the following day

Procainamide: pre-cardioversion, 15 mg/kg IV (up to max of 1250 mg) over 60 min, followed by continuous infusion of 2 mg/mL prior to cardioversionN/AUnclear
Matching placebo
Jong et al. 199538UnblindedNot specified91
  • External cardioversion

  • Four synchronized shocks (100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO three times daily for 4 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg daily for 1 month then 200 mg every other day for 1 month2 monthsUnclear | high
Matching placebo
Joseph et al. 200021Single blindMulti-centre120
  • External cardioversion.

  • Sequential shocks (50J, 100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J) until restoration of sinus rhythm was restored

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 5 mg/kg IV over 30 min then 200 mg PO every 8 h for 6 dosesN/ALow
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 1.5 mg/kg IV over 30 min then 80 mg PO every 8 h for 6 doses
No treatment
Kanoupakis et al. 200439UnblindedNot specified145
  • Internal cardioversion

  • Intracardiac electrical shock ranging from 3J to a maximum of 15J

Amiodarone: 600 mg PO daily for first 2 weeks then 200 mg daily until end of study4 weeksLow | high
Carvedilol: 6.25 mg PO twice daily, titrated up to 25 mg twice daily up to end of study
No treatment
Komatsu et al. 200940No specifiedSingle centre70
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial anterolateral shock of 150J and another shock of 250 to 350J if necessary

Cibenzoline: 70 mg IV over 5 minN/AUnclear
Pilsicainide: 50 mg IV over 5 min
Lombardi et al. 200641Double blindNot specified658
  • Direct-current cardioversion

Azimilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 125 mg PO daily or placebo daily for 26 weeksN/AHigh
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 26 weeks
Matching placebo
Manios etal. 200342UnblindedSingle centre111
  • Internal cardioversion

  • Intracardiac electrical shocks increasing from 3J to a maximum of 15J in 3J increments

Amiodarone: 600 mg PO daily for 2 weeks, then 200 mg daily up to end of study6 weeksLow | high
Diltiazem: 270 mg to 360 mg PO daily
No treatment
Mazzocca et al. 200643UnblindedSingle centre32
  • Transthoracic biphasic cardioversion

  • Shocks increasing from of 50J to a maximum of 200J (50J, 75J, 100J, 125J, 150J, 200J)

Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 0.01 mg/kg IV over 10 minN/AUnclear
No treatment
Okishige et al. 200044Not specifiedSingle centre62
  • External and internal direct-current cardioversion

  • External shocks attempted first at 220J and then at 400J if unsuccessful

  • Intracardiac shock of 50J to 100J if external cardioversion was unsuccessful

Pilsicainide: pre-cardioversion, 150 mg PO daily for 4 weeks; post-cardioversion, 50 mg PO 3 times daily for 2 years19 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Oral et al. 199919UnblindedSingle centre100
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Step-up protocol of 50J, 100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J

Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 1 mg IV over 10 min6 monthsUnclear | high
No treatment
Pritchett et al. 200622Double blindMulti-centre446
  • Electrical cardioversion

Azimilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 125 mg daily for 6 monthsN/AUnclear
Matched placebo
No treatment
Singh et al. 200045Double blindMulti-centre325
  • Electrical cardioversion

Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months12 monthsUnclear | unclear
Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 250 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months
Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 500 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months
Matching placebo
Singh et al. 200527Double blindMulti-centre665
  • External cardioversion

  • Up to four standardized monophasic shocks (100J, 200J, 360J, and 360J)

  • Biphasic shocks (150J, 175J, 200J, and 200J) were also used in the final year of the study

Amiodarone: 800 mg PO daily for first 14 days, then 600 mg PO daily for next 14 days, then 300 mg PO daily for first year, then 200 mg PO daily thereafter1 yearLow | low
Sotalol: 80 mg PO twice daily for first week, then 160 mg PO twice daily thereafter
Matching placebo
Sticherling et al. 200246Not specifiedSingle centre20
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Step-up protocol with either 100J, 200J, and 360J monophasic shocks or 75J, 120J, 150J, and 200J biphasic shocks

  • If unsuccessful, the alternative study drug was administered, and cardioversion was repeateda

Verapamil: pre-cardioversion, 0.15 mg/kg IV at rate of 2 mg/minN/AUnclear
Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 1 mg IV over 10 min
Sticherling et al. 200547UnblindedSingle centre20
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Biphasic shocks of 75J, 120J, 150J, and 200J

  • If unsuccessful, the alternative study drug was administered, and cardioversion was repeateda

Verapamil: pre-cardioversion, 0.15 mg/kg IV at rate of 2 mg/minN/AUnclear
Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 5 mg/kg IV over 5 min
Stroobandt et al. 199748Double blindMulti-centre136
  • Direct-current cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 200J, subsequent shock of 400J if unsuccessful

Propafenone: pre-cardioversion, 2 mg/kg IV over 30 min followed 2 h later by 150 mg PO every 8 h; post-cardioversion, 150 mg PO 3 times daily for 6 months6 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Thomas et al. 200420UnblindedSingle centre140
  • Electrical cardioversion

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 10 mg/kg IV amiodarone over 30 min; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO twice daily until discharge24 hUnclear | high
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 1.5 mg/kg IV over 10 min; post-cardioversion, 80 mg PO twice daily until discharge
No treatment
Vijayalakshmi et al. 200649UnblindedSingle centre94
  • External cardioversion

  • Monophasic shocks using step-up protocol (100J, 200J, 360J, 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, a final 360J shock was delivered after the administration of atropine

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO three times daily for the first week, twice daily for the second week, and once daily for 4 weeks6 monthsHigh | high
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 6 weeks
No treatment
Villani et al. 200023Single blindSingle centre120
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks using step-up protocol (50J, 100J, 150J, 200J, 250J, 300J, and 360 J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO daily for 1 month; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily1 monthUnclear | high
Diltiazem: pre-cardioversion, 60 mg PO 3 times a day for 1 month (titrated until heart rate <80 beats/min or max dose of 360 mg/day); post-cardioversion, continued at established dose
Digoxin: pre-cardioversion, 0.25 mg PO daily for 1 month; post-cardioversion, 0.25 mg PO daily
StudyDesignSettingNumber of patientsCardioversionArmsFollow-upRisk of bias (acute | maintenance)
Bianconi et al. 199630Single blindSingle centre100
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks in increasing energy levels (100J, 200J, 300J) until delivery of two 300J shocks

Propafenone: pre-cardioversion, three daily doses of 300 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg for 48 h; post-cardioversion, ongoing propafenone therapyN/AUnclear
Matching placebo
Boos et al. 200418UnblindedSingle centre35
  • External cardioversion

  • Five synchronized monophasic shocks (anterior-anterior: 200J, 360J, and 360J; then, anterior-posterior: 360J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 1 week of 200 mg PO three times daily; post-cardioversion, 3 weeks of 200 mg PO three times daily for 1 week, followed by 200 mg PO twice daily for 1 week, followed by 200 mg PO daily for 1 week16 monthsUnclear | high
No treatment
Capucci 200031UnblindedSingle centre92
  • External cardioversion

  • Seven synchronized shocks (50J, 100J, 150J, 200J, 250J, 300J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 1 month of 400 mg PO daily; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily2 monthsUnclear | high
Glucose-insulin-potassium solution: pre-cardioversion, continuous infusion for 24 h prior to cardioversion
No treatment
Channer et al. 200428Double blindMulti-centre161
  • External cardioversion

  • Five anterolateral synchronized shocks (100J, 200J, 360J, 360J, and 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, one additional anterolateral 360J shock

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO twice daily for 2 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO once daily for 8 weeks followed by matching placebo for 44 weeks52 weeksHigh | high
Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO twice daily for 2 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO once daily for 52 weeks
Matching placebo
Climent et al. 200432Double blindSingle centre54
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized successive shocks (200J, 300J, and 360J) until technical success or delivery of two 360J shocks

Flecainide: pre-cardioversion, 2 mg/kg IV over 30 min1 monthHigh | high
Matching placebo
De Simone et al. 200333UnblindedMulti-centre162
  • External cardioversion

  • Up to three synchronized external monophasic shocks (200J, 300J, and 360 J)

  • If unsuccessful, internal cardioversion via biphasic shocks in increasing energy levels (5J, 10J, and 30J) until restoration of sinus rhythm

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 600 mg PO daily for 7 days, followed by 400 mg PO daily for 7 days, then 200 mg PO daily for 14 days3 monthsUnclear | high
Flecainide: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily for 3 days
Galperin et al. 200134Double blindMulti-centre95
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 200J and two more shocks of 360J if necessary

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 600 mg PO daily for at least 4 weeks, then 200 mg PO daily16 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Hartel et al. 197435Double blindSingle centre52
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 100W, followed by 200W and 300W if necessary

Disopyramide: pre-cardioversion, 100 mg PO three times daily starting the day before cardioversion; post-cardioversion, 500 mg PO daily (in 3 doses) for maintenance3 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Hillestad et al. 197236UnblindedSingle centre124
  • Direct-current cardioversion

Quinidine sulphate: pre-cardioversion, 0.2 g PO twice daily until serum quinidine level of between 4 and 6 mg/LN/AUnclear
No treatment
Jacobs et al. 199837Not specifiedSingle centre100
  • Direct-current cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks at increasing energy levels (50J, 100J, 200J, 360J and 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, the subject was crossed over to the other therapy for another attempt at cardioversion the following day

Procainamide: pre-cardioversion, 15 mg/kg IV (up to max of 1250 mg) over 60 min, followed by continuous infusion of 2 mg/mL prior to cardioversionN/AUnclear
Matching placebo
Jong et al. 199538UnblindedNot specified91
  • External cardioversion

  • Four synchronized shocks (100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO three times daily for 4 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg daily for 1 month then 200 mg every other day for 1 month2 monthsUnclear | high
Matching placebo
Joseph et al. 200021Single blindMulti-centre120
  • External cardioversion.

  • Sequential shocks (50J, 100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J) until restoration of sinus rhythm was restored

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 5 mg/kg IV over 30 min then 200 mg PO every 8 h for 6 dosesN/ALow
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 1.5 mg/kg IV over 30 min then 80 mg PO every 8 h for 6 doses
No treatment
Kanoupakis et al. 200439UnblindedNot specified145
  • Internal cardioversion

  • Intracardiac electrical shock ranging from 3J to a maximum of 15J

Amiodarone: 600 mg PO daily for first 2 weeks then 200 mg daily until end of study4 weeksLow | high
Carvedilol: 6.25 mg PO twice daily, titrated up to 25 mg twice daily up to end of study
No treatment
Komatsu et al. 200940No specifiedSingle centre70
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial anterolateral shock of 150J and another shock of 250 to 350J if necessary

Cibenzoline: 70 mg IV over 5 minN/AUnclear
Pilsicainide: 50 mg IV over 5 min
Lombardi et al. 200641Double blindNot specified658
  • Direct-current cardioversion

Azimilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 125 mg PO daily or placebo daily for 26 weeksN/AHigh
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 26 weeks
Matching placebo
Manios etal. 200342UnblindedSingle centre111
  • Internal cardioversion

  • Intracardiac electrical shocks increasing from 3J to a maximum of 15J in 3J increments

Amiodarone: 600 mg PO daily for 2 weeks, then 200 mg daily up to end of study6 weeksLow | high
Diltiazem: 270 mg to 360 mg PO daily
No treatment
Mazzocca et al. 200643UnblindedSingle centre32
  • Transthoracic biphasic cardioversion

  • Shocks increasing from of 50J to a maximum of 200J (50J, 75J, 100J, 125J, 150J, 200J)

Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 0.01 mg/kg IV over 10 minN/AUnclear
No treatment
Okishige et al. 200044Not specifiedSingle centre62
  • External and internal direct-current cardioversion

  • External shocks attempted first at 220J and then at 400J if unsuccessful

  • Intracardiac shock of 50J to 100J if external cardioversion was unsuccessful

Pilsicainide: pre-cardioversion, 150 mg PO daily for 4 weeks; post-cardioversion, 50 mg PO 3 times daily for 2 years19 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Oral et al. 199919UnblindedSingle centre100
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Step-up protocol of 50J, 100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J

Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 1 mg IV over 10 min6 monthsUnclear | high
No treatment
Pritchett et al. 200622Double blindMulti-centre446
  • Electrical cardioversion

Azimilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 125 mg daily for 6 monthsN/AUnclear
Matched placebo
No treatment
Singh et al. 200045Double blindMulti-centre325
  • Electrical cardioversion

Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months12 monthsUnclear | unclear
Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 250 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months
Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 500 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months
Matching placebo
Singh et al. 200527Double blindMulti-centre665
  • External cardioversion

  • Up to four standardized monophasic shocks (100J, 200J, 360J, and 360J)

  • Biphasic shocks (150J, 175J, 200J, and 200J) were also used in the final year of the study

Amiodarone: 800 mg PO daily for first 14 days, then 600 mg PO daily for next 14 days, then 300 mg PO daily for first year, then 200 mg PO daily thereafter1 yearLow | low
Sotalol: 80 mg PO twice daily for first week, then 160 mg PO twice daily thereafter
Matching placebo
Sticherling et al. 200246Not specifiedSingle centre20
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Step-up protocol with either 100J, 200J, and 360J monophasic shocks or 75J, 120J, 150J, and 200J biphasic shocks

  • If unsuccessful, the alternative study drug was administered, and cardioversion was repeateda

Verapamil: pre-cardioversion, 0.15 mg/kg IV at rate of 2 mg/minN/AUnclear
Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 1 mg IV over 10 min
Sticherling et al. 200547UnblindedSingle centre20
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Biphasic shocks of 75J, 120J, 150J, and 200J

  • If unsuccessful, the alternative study drug was administered, and cardioversion was repeateda

Verapamil: pre-cardioversion, 0.15 mg/kg IV at rate of 2 mg/minN/AUnclear
Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 5 mg/kg IV over 5 min
Stroobandt et al. 199748Double blindMulti-centre136
  • Direct-current cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 200J, subsequent shock of 400J if unsuccessful

Propafenone: pre-cardioversion, 2 mg/kg IV over 30 min followed 2 h later by 150 mg PO every 8 h; post-cardioversion, 150 mg PO 3 times daily for 6 months6 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Thomas et al. 200420UnblindedSingle centre140
  • Electrical cardioversion

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 10 mg/kg IV amiodarone over 30 min; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO twice daily until discharge24 hUnclear | high
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 1.5 mg/kg IV over 10 min; post-cardioversion, 80 mg PO twice daily until discharge
No treatment
Vijayalakshmi et al. 200649UnblindedSingle centre94
  • External cardioversion

  • Monophasic shocks using step-up protocol (100J, 200J, 360J, 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, a final 360J shock was delivered after the administration of atropine

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO three times daily for the first week, twice daily for the second week, and once daily for 4 weeks6 monthsHigh | high
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 6 weeks
No treatment
Villani et al. 200023Single blindSingle centre120
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks using step-up protocol (50J, 100J, 150J, 200J, 250J, 300J, and 360 J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO daily for 1 month; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily1 monthUnclear | high
Diltiazem: pre-cardioversion, 60 mg PO 3 times a day for 1 month (titrated until heart rate <80 beats/min or max dose of 360 mg/day); post-cardioversion, continued at established dose
Digoxin: pre-cardioversion, 0.25 mg PO daily for 1 month; post-cardioversion, 0.25 mg PO daily
a

We did not include post-crossover results in our analysis.

Table 1

Characteristics of included studies.

StudyDesignSettingNumber of patientsCardioversionArmsFollow-upRisk of bias (acute | maintenance)
Bianconi et al. 199630Single blindSingle centre100
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks in increasing energy levels (100J, 200J, 300J) until delivery of two 300J shocks

Propafenone: pre-cardioversion, three daily doses of 300 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg for 48 h; post-cardioversion, ongoing propafenone therapyN/AUnclear
Matching placebo
Boos et al. 200418UnblindedSingle centre35
  • External cardioversion

  • Five synchronized monophasic shocks (anterior-anterior: 200J, 360J, and 360J; then, anterior-posterior: 360J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 1 week of 200 mg PO three times daily; post-cardioversion, 3 weeks of 200 mg PO three times daily for 1 week, followed by 200 mg PO twice daily for 1 week, followed by 200 mg PO daily for 1 week16 monthsUnclear | high
No treatment
Capucci 200031UnblindedSingle centre92
  • External cardioversion

  • Seven synchronized shocks (50J, 100J, 150J, 200J, 250J, 300J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 1 month of 400 mg PO daily; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily2 monthsUnclear | high
Glucose-insulin-potassium solution: pre-cardioversion, continuous infusion for 24 h prior to cardioversion
No treatment
Channer et al. 200428Double blindMulti-centre161
  • External cardioversion

  • Five anterolateral synchronized shocks (100J, 200J, 360J, 360J, and 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, one additional anterolateral 360J shock

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO twice daily for 2 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO once daily for 8 weeks followed by matching placebo for 44 weeks52 weeksHigh | high
Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO twice daily for 2 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO once daily for 52 weeks
Matching placebo
Climent et al. 200432Double blindSingle centre54
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized successive shocks (200J, 300J, and 360J) until technical success or delivery of two 360J shocks

Flecainide: pre-cardioversion, 2 mg/kg IV over 30 min1 monthHigh | high
Matching placebo
De Simone et al. 200333UnblindedMulti-centre162
  • External cardioversion

  • Up to three synchronized external monophasic shocks (200J, 300J, and 360 J)

  • If unsuccessful, internal cardioversion via biphasic shocks in increasing energy levels (5J, 10J, and 30J) until restoration of sinus rhythm

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 600 mg PO daily for 7 days, followed by 400 mg PO daily for 7 days, then 200 mg PO daily for 14 days3 monthsUnclear | high
Flecainide: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily for 3 days
Galperin et al. 200134Double blindMulti-centre95
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 200J and two more shocks of 360J if necessary

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 600 mg PO daily for at least 4 weeks, then 200 mg PO daily16 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Hartel et al. 197435Double blindSingle centre52
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 100W, followed by 200W and 300W if necessary

Disopyramide: pre-cardioversion, 100 mg PO three times daily starting the day before cardioversion; post-cardioversion, 500 mg PO daily (in 3 doses) for maintenance3 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Hillestad et al. 197236UnblindedSingle centre124
  • Direct-current cardioversion

Quinidine sulphate: pre-cardioversion, 0.2 g PO twice daily until serum quinidine level of between 4 and 6 mg/LN/AUnclear
No treatment
Jacobs et al. 199837Not specifiedSingle centre100
  • Direct-current cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks at increasing energy levels (50J, 100J, 200J, 360J and 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, the subject was crossed over to the other therapy for another attempt at cardioversion the following day

Procainamide: pre-cardioversion, 15 mg/kg IV (up to max of 1250 mg) over 60 min, followed by continuous infusion of 2 mg/mL prior to cardioversionN/AUnclear
Matching placebo
Jong et al. 199538UnblindedNot specified91
  • External cardioversion

  • Four synchronized shocks (100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO three times daily for 4 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg daily for 1 month then 200 mg every other day for 1 month2 monthsUnclear | high
Matching placebo
Joseph et al. 200021Single blindMulti-centre120
  • External cardioversion.

  • Sequential shocks (50J, 100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J) until restoration of sinus rhythm was restored

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 5 mg/kg IV over 30 min then 200 mg PO every 8 h for 6 dosesN/ALow
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 1.5 mg/kg IV over 30 min then 80 mg PO every 8 h for 6 doses
No treatment
Kanoupakis et al. 200439UnblindedNot specified145
  • Internal cardioversion

  • Intracardiac electrical shock ranging from 3J to a maximum of 15J

Amiodarone: 600 mg PO daily for first 2 weeks then 200 mg daily until end of study4 weeksLow | high
Carvedilol: 6.25 mg PO twice daily, titrated up to 25 mg twice daily up to end of study
No treatment
Komatsu et al. 200940No specifiedSingle centre70
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial anterolateral shock of 150J and another shock of 250 to 350J if necessary

Cibenzoline: 70 mg IV over 5 minN/AUnclear
Pilsicainide: 50 mg IV over 5 min
Lombardi et al. 200641Double blindNot specified658
  • Direct-current cardioversion

Azimilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 125 mg PO daily or placebo daily for 26 weeksN/AHigh
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 26 weeks
Matching placebo
Manios etal. 200342UnblindedSingle centre111
  • Internal cardioversion

  • Intracardiac electrical shocks increasing from 3J to a maximum of 15J in 3J increments

Amiodarone: 600 mg PO daily for 2 weeks, then 200 mg daily up to end of study6 weeksLow | high
Diltiazem: 270 mg to 360 mg PO daily
No treatment
Mazzocca et al. 200643UnblindedSingle centre32
  • Transthoracic biphasic cardioversion

  • Shocks increasing from of 50J to a maximum of 200J (50J, 75J, 100J, 125J, 150J, 200J)

Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 0.01 mg/kg IV over 10 minN/AUnclear
No treatment
Okishige et al. 200044Not specifiedSingle centre62
  • External and internal direct-current cardioversion

  • External shocks attempted first at 220J and then at 400J if unsuccessful

  • Intracardiac shock of 50J to 100J if external cardioversion was unsuccessful

Pilsicainide: pre-cardioversion, 150 mg PO daily for 4 weeks; post-cardioversion, 50 mg PO 3 times daily for 2 years19 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Oral et al. 199919UnblindedSingle centre100
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Step-up protocol of 50J, 100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J

Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 1 mg IV over 10 min6 monthsUnclear | high
No treatment
Pritchett et al. 200622Double blindMulti-centre446
  • Electrical cardioversion

Azimilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 125 mg daily for 6 monthsN/AUnclear
Matched placebo
No treatment
Singh et al. 200045Double blindMulti-centre325
  • Electrical cardioversion

Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months12 monthsUnclear | unclear
Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 250 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months
Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 500 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months
Matching placebo
Singh et al. 200527Double blindMulti-centre665
  • External cardioversion

  • Up to four standardized monophasic shocks (100J, 200J, 360J, and 360J)

  • Biphasic shocks (150J, 175J, 200J, and 200J) were also used in the final year of the study

Amiodarone: 800 mg PO daily for first 14 days, then 600 mg PO daily for next 14 days, then 300 mg PO daily for first year, then 200 mg PO daily thereafter1 yearLow | low
Sotalol: 80 mg PO twice daily for first week, then 160 mg PO twice daily thereafter
Matching placebo
Sticherling et al. 200246Not specifiedSingle centre20
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Step-up protocol with either 100J, 200J, and 360J monophasic shocks or 75J, 120J, 150J, and 200J biphasic shocks

  • If unsuccessful, the alternative study drug was administered, and cardioversion was repeateda

Verapamil: pre-cardioversion, 0.15 mg/kg IV at rate of 2 mg/minN/AUnclear
Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 1 mg IV over 10 min
Sticherling et al. 200547UnblindedSingle centre20
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Biphasic shocks of 75J, 120J, 150J, and 200J

  • If unsuccessful, the alternative study drug was administered, and cardioversion was repeateda

Verapamil: pre-cardioversion, 0.15 mg/kg IV at rate of 2 mg/minN/AUnclear
Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 5 mg/kg IV over 5 min
Stroobandt et al. 199748Double blindMulti-centre136
  • Direct-current cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 200J, subsequent shock of 400J if unsuccessful

Propafenone: pre-cardioversion, 2 mg/kg IV over 30 min followed 2 h later by 150 mg PO every 8 h; post-cardioversion, 150 mg PO 3 times daily for 6 months6 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Thomas et al. 200420UnblindedSingle centre140
  • Electrical cardioversion

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 10 mg/kg IV amiodarone over 30 min; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO twice daily until discharge24 hUnclear | high
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 1.5 mg/kg IV over 10 min; post-cardioversion, 80 mg PO twice daily until discharge
No treatment
Vijayalakshmi et al. 200649UnblindedSingle centre94
  • External cardioversion

  • Monophasic shocks using step-up protocol (100J, 200J, 360J, 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, a final 360J shock was delivered after the administration of atropine

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO three times daily for the first week, twice daily for the second week, and once daily for 4 weeks6 monthsHigh | high
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 6 weeks
No treatment
Villani et al. 200023Single blindSingle centre120
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks using step-up protocol (50J, 100J, 150J, 200J, 250J, 300J, and 360 J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO daily for 1 month; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily1 monthUnclear | high
Diltiazem: pre-cardioversion, 60 mg PO 3 times a day for 1 month (titrated until heart rate <80 beats/min or max dose of 360 mg/day); post-cardioversion, continued at established dose
Digoxin: pre-cardioversion, 0.25 mg PO daily for 1 month; post-cardioversion, 0.25 mg PO daily
StudyDesignSettingNumber of patientsCardioversionArmsFollow-upRisk of bias (acute | maintenance)
Bianconi et al. 199630Single blindSingle centre100
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks in increasing energy levels (100J, 200J, 300J) until delivery of two 300J shocks

Propafenone: pre-cardioversion, three daily doses of 300 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg for 48 h; post-cardioversion, ongoing propafenone therapyN/AUnclear
Matching placebo
Boos et al. 200418UnblindedSingle centre35
  • External cardioversion

  • Five synchronized monophasic shocks (anterior-anterior: 200J, 360J, and 360J; then, anterior-posterior: 360J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 1 week of 200 mg PO three times daily; post-cardioversion, 3 weeks of 200 mg PO three times daily for 1 week, followed by 200 mg PO twice daily for 1 week, followed by 200 mg PO daily for 1 week16 monthsUnclear | high
No treatment
Capucci 200031UnblindedSingle centre92
  • External cardioversion

  • Seven synchronized shocks (50J, 100J, 150J, 200J, 250J, 300J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 1 month of 400 mg PO daily; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily2 monthsUnclear | high
Glucose-insulin-potassium solution: pre-cardioversion, continuous infusion for 24 h prior to cardioversion
No treatment
Channer et al. 200428Double blindMulti-centre161
  • External cardioversion

  • Five anterolateral synchronized shocks (100J, 200J, 360J, 360J, and 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, one additional anterolateral 360J shock

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO twice daily for 2 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO once daily for 8 weeks followed by matching placebo for 44 weeks52 weeksHigh | high
Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO twice daily for 2 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO once daily for 52 weeks
Matching placebo
Climent et al. 200432Double blindSingle centre54
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized successive shocks (200J, 300J, and 360J) until technical success or delivery of two 360J shocks

Flecainide: pre-cardioversion, 2 mg/kg IV over 30 min1 monthHigh | high
Matching placebo
De Simone et al. 200333UnblindedMulti-centre162
  • External cardioversion

  • Up to three synchronized external monophasic shocks (200J, 300J, and 360 J)

  • If unsuccessful, internal cardioversion via biphasic shocks in increasing energy levels (5J, 10J, and 30J) until restoration of sinus rhythm

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 600 mg PO daily for 7 days, followed by 400 mg PO daily for 7 days, then 200 mg PO daily for 14 days3 monthsUnclear | high
Flecainide: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily for 3 days
Galperin et al. 200134Double blindMulti-centre95
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 200J and two more shocks of 360J if necessary

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 600 mg PO daily for at least 4 weeks, then 200 mg PO daily16 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Hartel et al. 197435Double blindSingle centre52
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 100W, followed by 200W and 300W if necessary

Disopyramide: pre-cardioversion, 100 mg PO three times daily starting the day before cardioversion; post-cardioversion, 500 mg PO daily (in 3 doses) for maintenance3 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Hillestad et al. 197236UnblindedSingle centre124
  • Direct-current cardioversion

Quinidine sulphate: pre-cardioversion, 0.2 g PO twice daily until serum quinidine level of between 4 and 6 mg/LN/AUnclear
No treatment
Jacobs et al. 199837Not specifiedSingle centre100
  • Direct-current cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks at increasing energy levels (50J, 100J, 200J, 360J and 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, the subject was crossed over to the other therapy for another attempt at cardioversion the following day

Procainamide: pre-cardioversion, 15 mg/kg IV (up to max of 1250 mg) over 60 min, followed by continuous infusion of 2 mg/mL prior to cardioversionN/AUnclear
Matching placebo
Jong et al. 199538UnblindedNot specified91
  • External cardioversion

  • Four synchronized shocks (100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO three times daily for 4 weeks; post-cardioversion, 200 mg daily for 1 month then 200 mg every other day for 1 month2 monthsUnclear | high
Matching placebo
Joseph et al. 200021Single blindMulti-centre120
  • External cardioversion.

  • Sequential shocks (50J, 100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J) until restoration of sinus rhythm was restored

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 5 mg/kg IV over 30 min then 200 mg PO every 8 h for 6 dosesN/ALow
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 1.5 mg/kg IV over 30 min then 80 mg PO every 8 h for 6 doses
No treatment
Kanoupakis et al. 200439UnblindedNot specified145
  • Internal cardioversion

  • Intracardiac electrical shock ranging from 3J to a maximum of 15J

Amiodarone: 600 mg PO daily for first 2 weeks then 200 mg daily until end of study4 weeksLow | high
Carvedilol: 6.25 mg PO twice daily, titrated up to 25 mg twice daily up to end of study
No treatment
Komatsu et al. 200940No specifiedSingle centre70
  • External cardioversion

  • Initial anterolateral shock of 150J and another shock of 250 to 350J if necessary

Cibenzoline: 70 mg IV over 5 minN/AUnclear
Pilsicainide: 50 mg IV over 5 min
Lombardi et al. 200641Double blindNot specified658
  • Direct-current cardioversion

Azimilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 125 mg PO daily or placebo daily for 26 weeksN/AHigh
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 26 weeks
Matching placebo
Manios etal. 200342UnblindedSingle centre111
  • Internal cardioversion

  • Intracardiac electrical shocks increasing from 3J to a maximum of 15J in 3J increments

Amiodarone: 600 mg PO daily for 2 weeks, then 200 mg daily up to end of study6 weeksLow | high
Diltiazem: 270 mg to 360 mg PO daily
No treatment
Mazzocca et al. 200643UnblindedSingle centre32
  • Transthoracic biphasic cardioversion

  • Shocks increasing from of 50J to a maximum of 200J (50J, 75J, 100J, 125J, 150J, 200J)

Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 0.01 mg/kg IV over 10 minN/AUnclear
No treatment
Okishige et al. 200044Not specifiedSingle centre62
  • External and internal direct-current cardioversion

  • External shocks attempted first at 220J and then at 400J if unsuccessful

  • Intracardiac shock of 50J to 100J if external cardioversion was unsuccessful

Pilsicainide: pre-cardioversion, 150 mg PO daily for 4 weeks; post-cardioversion, 50 mg PO 3 times daily for 2 years19 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Oral et al. 199919UnblindedSingle centre100
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Step-up protocol of 50J, 100J, 200J, 300J, and 360J

Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 1 mg IV over 10 min6 monthsUnclear | high
No treatment
Pritchett et al. 200622Double blindMulti-centre446
  • Electrical cardioversion

Azimilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 mg PO twice daily for 3 days; post-cardioversion, 125 mg daily for 6 monthsN/AUnclear
Matched placebo
No treatment
Singh et al. 200045Double blindMulti-centre325
  • Electrical cardioversion

Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months12 monthsUnclear | unclear
Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 250 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months
Dofetilide: pre-cardioversion, 500 μg twice daily for a minimum of 3 days or 5 doses; post-cardioversion, 125 μg twice daily for 12 months
Matching placebo
Singh et al. 200527Double blindMulti-centre665
  • External cardioversion

  • Up to four standardized monophasic shocks (100J, 200J, 360J, and 360J)

  • Biphasic shocks (150J, 175J, 200J, and 200J) were also used in the final year of the study

Amiodarone: 800 mg PO daily for first 14 days, then 600 mg PO daily for next 14 days, then 300 mg PO daily for first year, then 200 mg PO daily thereafter1 yearLow | low
Sotalol: 80 mg PO twice daily for first week, then 160 mg PO twice daily thereafter
Matching placebo
Sticherling et al. 200246Not specifiedSingle centre20
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Step-up protocol with either 100J, 200J, and 360J monophasic shocks or 75J, 120J, 150J, and 200J biphasic shocks

  • If unsuccessful, the alternative study drug was administered, and cardioversion was repeateda

Verapamil: pre-cardioversion, 0.15 mg/kg IV at rate of 2 mg/minN/AUnclear
Ibutilide: pre-cardioversion, 1 mg IV over 10 min
Sticherling et al. 200547UnblindedSingle centre20
  • Transthoracic cardioversion

  • Biphasic shocks of 75J, 120J, 150J, and 200J

  • If unsuccessful, the alternative study drug was administered, and cardioversion was repeateda

Verapamil: pre-cardioversion, 0.15 mg/kg IV at rate of 2 mg/minN/AUnclear
Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 5 mg/kg IV over 5 min
Stroobandt et al. 199748Double blindMulti-centre136
  • Direct-current cardioversion

  • Initial shock of 200J, subsequent shock of 400J if unsuccessful

Propafenone: pre-cardioversion, 2 mg/kg IV over 30 min followed 2 h later by 150 mg PO every 8 h; post-cardioversion, 150 mg PO 3 times daily for 6 months6 monthsUnclear | unclear
Matching placebo
Thomas et al. 200420UnblindedSingle centre140
  • Electrical cardioversion

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 10 mg/kg IV amiodarone over 30 min; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO twice daily until discharge24 hUnclear | high
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 1.5 mg/kg IV over 10 min; post-cardioversion, 80 mg PO twice daily until discharge
No treatment
Vijayalakshmi et al. 200649UnblindedSingle centre94
  • External cardioversion

  • Monophasic shocks using step-up protocol (100J, 200J, 360J, 360J)

  • If unsuccessful, a final 360J shock was delivered after the administration of atropine

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 200 mg PO three times daily for the first week, twice daily for the second week, and once daily for 4 weeks6 monthsHigh | high
Sotalol: pre-cardioversion, 160 mg PO twice daily for 6 weeks
No treatment
Villani et al. 200023Single blindSingle centre120
  • External cardioversion

  • Synchronized shocks using step-up protocol (50J, 100J, 150J, 200J, 250J, 300J, and 360 J)

Amiodarone: pre-cardioversion, 400 mg PO daily for 1 month; post-cardioversion, 200 mg PO daily1 monthUnclear | high
Diltiazem: pre-cardioversion, 60 mg PO 3 times a day for 1 month (titrated until heart rate <80 beats/min or max dose of 360 mg/day); post-cardioversion, continued at established dose
Digoxin: pre-cardioversion, 0.25 mg PO daily for 1 month; post-cardioversion, 0.25 mg PO daily
a

We did not include post-crossover results in our analysis.

For the acute restoration of sinus rhythm outcome, 20 of 28 studies had an unclear risk of bias with four studies each having a low and high risk of bias (see Table 1 and Supplementary material online, Appendix S2). For the maintenance of sinus rhythm outcome, 12 of 18 studies had a high risk of bias, and one study had a low risk of bias. The most common reason for an unclear risk of bias was an inadequate description of the randomization protocol (9 of 21 acute restoration studies and 4 of 5 long-term maintenance studies). For the maintenance of sinus rhythm outcome, lack of blinding of participants, personnel and/or outcome assessment was the most common cause of high risk of bias (9 of 12 studies).

Pre-treatment regimens

Table 1 details the treatment regimens used prior to electrical cardioversion. Class Ia regimens included disopyramide, procainamide, quinidine, and cibenzoline. Class Ic regimens were flecainide, propafenone, and pilsicainide. Class III regimens included sotalol, ibutilide, azimilide, and dofetilide. Dosing regimens for amiodarone ranged from 5 mg/kg IV over 5–30 min to 200–800 mg PO daily for 1–6 weeks.

Acute restoration of sinus rhythm

The number of trials included in direct comparisons varied from 1 to 13 (Table 3). Figure 1A is the network diagram for acute restoration of sinus rhythm. An indirect estimate was not generated for Class III vs. no treatment or rate control because the studies that comprised the network loop were the same three-arm trials that informed the direct comparison.

Network diagram of acute restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. The size of each node is proportional to the number of participants. The size of each edge reflects the number of studies for that comparison.
Figure 1

Network diagram of acute restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. The size of each node is proportional to the number of participants. The size of each edge reflects the number of studies for that comparison.

Table 3

SUCRA values for five-node analysis

Anti-arrhythmic drugSucra
Acute restoration
 Amiodarone0.83
 Class III0.76
 Class Ia0.50
 Class Ic0.31
 No treatment or rate control0.10
Long-term maintenance
 Amiodarone0.93
 Class Ia0.63
 Class Ic0.52
 Class III0.41
 No treatment or rate control0.01
Anti-arrhythmic drugSucra
Acute restoration
 Amiodarone0.83
 Class III0.76
 Class Ia0.50
 Class Ic0.31
 No treatment or rate control0.10
Long-term maintenance
 Amiodarone0.93
 Class Ia0.63
 Class Ic0.52
 Class III0.41
 No treatment or rate control0.01

SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve.

Table 3

SUCRA values for five-node analysis

Anti-arrhythmic drugSucra
Acute restoration
 Amiodarone0.83
 Class III0.76
 Class Ia0.50
 Class Ic0.31
 No treatment or rate control0.10
Long-term maintenance
 Amiodarone0.93
 Class Ia0.63
 Class Ic0.52
 Class III0.41
 No treatment or rate control0.01
Anti-arrhythmic drugSucra
Acute restoration
 Amiodarone0.83
 Class III0.76
 Class Ia0.50
 Class Ic0.31
 No treatment or rate control0.10
Long-term maintenance
 Amiodarone0.93
 Class Ia0.63
 Class Ic0.52
 Class III0.41
 No treatment or rate control0.01

SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve.

Table 2

Network meta-analysis results of five-node analysis, including confidence assessments

ComparisonTrials with direct comparisons (n)Direct estimate (95% CI)Indirect estimate (95% CrI)NMA estimate (95% CrI)Overall certainty
Acute restoration of sinus rhythm
 Class Ia vs. no treatment or rate control31.04 (0.38, 2.89)8.10 (1.22, 55.69)1.65 (0.65, 4.24)High
 Class Ic vs. no treatment or rate control41.54 (0.60, 4.02)0.81 (0.17, 3.88)1.30 (0.59, 2.96)High
 Class III vs. no treatment or rate control102.41 (1.37, 4.62)N/A*2.41 (1.37, 4.62)High
 Amiodarone vs. no treatment or rate control132.82 (1.61, 4.98)0.80 (0.07, 8.89)2.58 (1.54, 4.37)High
 Class Ic vs. Class Ia10.21 (0.04, 1.22)1.67 (0.47, 6.46)0.79 (0.26, 2.38)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class Ic10.74 (0.08, 6.94)2.40 (0.88, 6.76)1.97 (0.79, 5.02)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class III40.75 (0.25, 2.11)1.45 (0.43, 4.01)1.07 (0.50, 2.12)High
Long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm
 Class Ia vs. no treatment or rate control13.52 (0.94, 14.08)N/A*3.52 (0.94, 14.08)High
 Class Ic vs. no treatment or rate control31.91 (0.96, 4.08)4.71 (2.03, 11.03)2.83 (1.60, 5.10)Moderate
 Class III vs. no treatment or rate control52.50 (1.70, 3.79)N/A*2.50 (1.70, 3.79)High
 Amiodarone vs. no treatment or rate control115.86 (4.09, 8.42)2.37 (0.68, 8.33)5.37 (4.00, 7.39)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class Ic11.22 (0.55, 2.81)3.08 (1.38, 6.48)1.89 (1.05, 3.45)Moderate
 Amiodarone vs. Class III32.31 (1.21, 4.18)1.97 (0.88, 4.46)2.19 (1.39, 3.26)High
ComparisonTrials with direct comparisons (n)Direct estimate (95% CI)Indirect estimate (95% CrI)NMA estimate (95% CrI)Overall certainty
Acute restoration of sinus rhythm
 Class Ia vs. no treatment or rate control31.04 (0.38, 2.89)8.10 (1.22, 55.69)1.65 (0.65, 4.24)High
 Class Ic vs. no treatment or rate control41.54 (0.60, 4.02)0.81 (0.17, 3.88)1.30 (0.59, 2.96)High
 Class III vs. no treatment or rate control102.41 (1.37, 4.62)N/A*2.41 (1.37, 4.62)High
 Amiodarone vs. no treatment or rate control132.82 (1.61, 4.98)0.80 (0.07, 8.89)2.58 (1.54, 4.37)High
 Class Ic vs. Class Ia10.21 (0.04, 1.22)1.67 (0.47, 6.46)0.79 (0.26, 2.38)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class Ic10.74 (0.08, 6.94)2.40 (0.88, 6.76)1.97 (0.79, 5.02)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class III40.75 (0.25, 2.11)1.45 (0.43, 4.01)1.07 (0.50, 2.12)High
Long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm
 Class Ia vs. no treatment or rate control13.52 (0.94, 14.08)N/A*3.52 (0.94, 14.08)High
 Class Ic vs. no treatment or rate control31.91 (0.96, 4.08)4.71 (2.03, 11.03)2.83 (1.60, 5.10)Moderate
 Class III vs. no treatment or rate control52.50 (1.70, 3.79)N/A*2.50 (1.70, 3.79)High
 Amiodarone vs. no treatment or rate control115.86 (4.09, 8.42)2.37 (0.68, 8.33)5.37 (4.00, 7.39)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class Ic11.22 (0.55, 2.81)3.08 (1.38, 6.48)1.89 (1.05, 3.45)Moderate
 Amiodarone vs. Class III32.31 (1.21, 4.18)1.97 (0.88, 4.46)2.19 (1.39, 3.26)High

CI, confidence interval; CrI, credible interval; N/A, not applicable.

Table 2

Network meta-analysis results of five-node analysis, including confidence assessments

ComparisonTrials with direct comparisons (n)Direct estimate (95% CI)Indirect estimate (95% CrI)NMA estimate (95% CrI)Overall certainty
Acute restoration of sinus rhythm
 Class Ia vs. no treatment or rate control31.04 (0.38, 2.89)8.10 (1.22, 55.69)1.65 (0.65, 4.24)High
 Class Ic vs. no treatment or rate control41.54 (0.60, 4.02)0.81 (0.17, 3.88)1.30 (0.59, 2.96)High
 Class III vs. no treatment or rate control102.41 (1.37, 4.62)N/A*2.41 (1.37, 4.62)High
 Amiodarone vs. no treatment or rate control132.82 (1.61, 4.98)0.80 (0.07, 8.89)2.58 (1.54, 4.37)High
 Class Ic vs. Class Ia10.21 (0.04, 1.22)1.67 (0.47, 6.46)0.79 (0.26, 2.38)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class Ic10.74 (0.08, 6.94)2.40 (0.88, 6.76)1.97 (0.79, 5.02)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class III40.75 (0.25, 2.11)1.45 (0.43, 4.01)1.07 (0.50, 2.12)High
Long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm
 Class Ia vs. no treatment or rate control13.52 (0.94, 14.08)N/A*3.52 (0.94, 14.08)High
 Class Ic vs. no treatment or rate control31.91 (0.96, 4.08)4.71 (2.03, 11.03)2.83 (1.60, 5.10)Moderate
 Class III vs. no treatment or rate control52.50 (1.70, 3.79)N/A*2.50 (1.70, 3.79)High
 Amiodarone vs. no treatment or rate control115.86 (4.09, 8.42)2.37 (0.68, 8.33)5.37 (4.00, 7.39)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class Ic11.22 (0.55, 2.81)3.08 (1.38, 6.48)1.89 (1.05, 3.45)Moderate
 Amiodarone vs. Class III32.31 (1.21, 4.18)1.97 (0.88, 4.46)2.19 (1.39, 3.26)High
ComparisonTrials with direct comparisons (n)Direct estimate (95% CI)Indirect estimate (95% CrI)NMA estimate (95% CrI)Overall certainty
Acute restoration of sinus rhythm
 Class Ia vs. no treatment or rate control31.04 (0.38, 2.89)8.10 (1.22, 55.69)1.65 (0.65, 4.24)High
 Class Ic vs. no treatment or rate control41.54 (0.60, 4.02)0.81 (0.17, 3.88)1.30 (0.59, 2.96)High
 Class III vs. no treatment or rate control102.41 (1.37, 4.62)N/A*2.41 (1.37, 4.62)High
 Amiodarone vs. no treatment or rate control132.82 (1.61, 4.98)0.80 (0.07, 8.89)2.58 (1.54, 4.37)High
 Class Ic vs. Class Ia10.21 (0.04, 1.22)1.67 (0.47, 6.46)0.79 (0.26, 2.38)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class Ic10.74 (0.08, 6.94)2.40 (0.88, 6.76)1.97 (0.79, 5.02)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class III40.75 (0.25, 2.11)1.45 (0.43, 4.01)1.07 (0.50, 2.12)High
Long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm
 Class Ia vs. no treatment or rate control13.52 (0.94, 14.08)N/A*3.52 (0.94, 14.08)High
 Class Ic vs. no treatment or rate control31.91 (0.96, 4.08)4.71 (2.03, 11.03)2.83 (1.60, 5.10)Moderate
 Class III vs. no treatment or rate control52.50 (1.70, 3.79)N/A*2.50 (1.70, 3.79)High
 Amiodarone vs. no treatment or rate control115.86 (4.09, 8.42)2.37 (0.68, 8.33)5.37 (4.00, 7.39)High
 Amiodarone vs. Class Ic11.22 (0.55, 2.81)3.08 (1.38, 6.48)1.89 (1.05, 3.45)Moderate
 Amiodarone vs. Class III32.31 (1.21, 4.18)1.97 (0.88, 4.46)2.19 (1.39, 3.26)High

CI, confidence interval; CrI, credible interval; N/A, not applicable.

In absolute terms, the unadjusted average rate of acute conversion in the no treatment or rate control arm was 74.8% (1210/1618). For Classes Ia, Ic, and III AADs, the unadjusted success rates were 81.1% (163/201), 80.7% (276/342), and 83.7% (1145/1368), respectively. The absolute conversion rate for amiodarone was 83.3% (729/875).

Table 2 lists the results of the NMA. Compared with no treatment or rate control, amiodarone and Class III AADs were associated with increased restoration of sinus rhythm: Class III (OR: 2.41; CrI: 1.37–4.62, high certainty); and amiodarone (OR: 2.58; CrI: 1.54–4.37, high certainty). No AAD class was associated with increased odds of cardioversion compared with one another.

According to SUCRA (Table 3), amiodarone (0.81) and Class III AADs (0.73) were most likely to be the best intervention when compared with Class Ia (0.59) and Ic (0.30) AADs and no treatment or rate control (0.07).

Results were consistent between direct and indirect comparisons for all analyses. Although the direction of effect differed between direct and indirect estimates for two comparisons—i.e. Class Ic and amiodarone vs. no treatment or rate control (see Supplementary material online, Appendix S3)—no comparison met the a priori established threshold of P < 0.05 in the node-splitting analysis for inconsistency (see Supplementary material online, Appendix).

Long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm

The number of trials included in direct comparisons ranged from 1 to 11 and the mean duration of follow-up was 7 months (range: 24 h to 18.7 months), (Table 2). Figure 1B is the network diagram for this outcome. An indirect estimate was not generated for two comparisons: Class Ia and Class III vs. no treatment or rate control. Class Ia had a single comparison with no treatment or rate control. An indirect estimate was not generated for Class III vs. no treatment or rate control because the studies that comprised the network loop were the same three-arm trials that informed the direct comparison.

The unadjusted proportion of patients who maintained sinus rhythm in the no treatment or rate control arm was 28.9% (260/900). For Classes Ia, Ic, and III AADs, the unadjusted success rates were 50.0% (13/26), 43.2% (112/259), and 39.5% (250/633), respectively. The absolute maintenance rate for amiodarone was 58.0% (477/822).

Except for Class Ia (OR: 3.52; CrI: 0.94–14.08, high certainty), the other AAD groups were associated with significantly increased odds (see Table 3) of maintaining sinus rhythm when compared with no treatment or rate control: Class Ic (OR: 2.83; CrI: 1.60–5.10, moderate certainty), Class III (OR: 2.50; CrI: 1.70–3.79, high certainty) and amiodarone (OR: 5.37; CrI: 4.00–7.39, high certainty).

Amiodarone was associated with higher odds when compared with Class Ic (OR: 1.89; CrI: 1.05–3.45, moderate certainty) and Class III (OR: 2.19; CrI: 1.39–3.26, high certainty) AADs. SUCRA results were consistent with these findings (see Table 2). Amiodarone ranked first for this outcome (0.93)—followed by Class Ia (0.64), Class Ic (0.52), Class III (0.41), and no treatment or rate control (0.008).

Node-splitting analysis and visual inspection of the forest plot did not demonstrate inconsistency between direct and indirect estimates for all comparisons regarding maintenance of sinus rhythm (see Supplementary material online, Appendix 3).

Assessment of certainty of evidence

We assessed the evidence for all comparisons to be of high certainty for acute restoration of sinus rhythm (see Table 2).24 The certainty for direct and indirect estimates varied between moderate and high.

For maintenance of sinus rhythm, we assessed 4 comparisons to be of high certainty and two to be of moderate certainty (see Table 2). The certainty of evidence for comparisons between Class Ic and no treatment or rate control, and amiodarone was downgraded for serious risk of bias because each comparison was driven by a study with high risk of bias for inconsistent reporting of results and lack of blinding, respectively.

Discussion

In patients with AF undergoing electrical cardioversion, pre-treatment with amiodarone and Class III AADs both enhance the acute restoration of sinus rhythm with comparable efficacy. For the long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm, amiodarone is most likely to have benefit, but other Class III AADs and Class Ic AADs are also effective.

The current guidelines for AF published by the American College of Cardiology provides a Class I recommendation for repeated attempts at cardioversion and includes a brief phrase regarding AAD administration prior to repeat cardioversion—citing a single RCT included in this review and mentioning only ibutilide.19,25 The Canadian Cardiovascular Society makes a similar recommendation based on a single RCT and mentions only amiodarone and ibutilide.26 Based on several individual RCTs that are included in this review, the European Society of Cardiology provides a Class IIa recommendation to specifically consider amiodarone, flecainide, ibutilide, or propafenone to facilitate electrical cardioversion.19,23,27–30

Contemporary data suggest that pre-treatment is only used in a small number of patients undergoing cardioversion. In the X-VeRT trial (an international RCT of two oral anticoagulant strategies in 1504 AF patients undergoing elective cardioversion), fewer than 30% of participants were administered amiodarone, Class I, or III AADs before electrical cardioversion.3

This NMA demonstrated high certainty of evidence for pre-treating patients with amiodarone and Class III AADs before an electrical cardioversion to more than double the odds of the acute restoration of sinus rhythm. It has also shown with high certainty that amiodarone is the optimal AAD regimen for post-cardioversion maintenance of sinus rhythm. These results expand on the recommendations of major American, Canadian, and European guidelines and should lead to broader recommendations for pre-treatment in all patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion of AF or specific recommendations for Class III AADs or amiodarone for acute restoration and amiodarone for the long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Based on the absolute conversion rate of 75% for acute restoration in the no treatment or rate control arm in our study, pre-treatment with amiodarone may increase the restoration of sinus rhythm to 89%. Based on an absolute rate of 29% in the no treatment or rate control arm in this study, the long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm would have increased to 69% with pre- and post-treatment using amiodarone. Application of the evidence synthesized in this review may lead to improved outcomes for patients with AF by reducing healthcare resource utilization (e.g. repeat electrical cardioversion, unplanned visits), limiting the proportion of symptomatic patients abandoning a rhythm control strategy and decreasing the symptomatic burden during the waiting period for patients pursuing AF ablation. Scientific societies should review the scope and the strength of their recommendations considering these results. Meanwhile, clinicians may consider a broader and more consistent use of AAD pre-treatment before electrical cardioversion of AF.

Strengths

This NMA has several strengths. We performed a comprehensive search with high sensitivity and applied rigorous rule-based methods for data collection and assessment. We assessed the risk of bias for included studies and evaluated the certainty of evidence for outcomes of interest in accordance with GRADE methodology for NMA.

Limitations

To strengthen our network framework, we grouped Classes of AADs together which may have introduced heterogeneity to the network. We only included AADs that were currently available and approved for use in Canada or the United States. Excluded AADs included AZD7009, AZD1305, and bepridil. In addition, we were unable to classify the risk of selection bias for 9 studies due to inadequate reporting in published manuscripts. Finally, given the limited reporting of safety data in our included studies, we did not capture the data for this outcome. The adverse effects of AADs are well known and better addressed by studies with increased scope and the primary intent of answering that clinical question.

Conclusions

Pre-treatment with amiodarone or Class III AADs improves the acute restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with AF undergoing elective electrical cardioversion. Amiodarone is likely superior to other Class III and Ic agents for post-cardioversion maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Europace online.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Laura Banfield for refining our search strategy. We would also like to acknowledge Serena Sibilio, Cathevine Yang, and Alexandra Sibiga for their translation of Italian, Chinese, and Polish. The authors (W.F.M. and K.J.U.) are members of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Network of Canada (CANet) HQP Association for Trainees (CHAT).

Funding

This work was supported by a Mach-Gaensslen Medical Summer Student Research Grant (2017), McMaster University Department of Medicine Medical Student Research Award (2017), McMaster Medical Student Research Excellence Scholarship (2018), and Heart and Stroke Foundation Ontario Evelyn McGloin Summer Medical Student Scholarship (2018). Emilie Belley-Côté is supported by the E.J. Moran Campbell McMaster Internal Career Award and by a Heart and Stroke Foundation National New Investigator award. R.P.W. holds the Canada Research Chair in Cardiovascular Surgery.

Data Availability

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.

References

1

Martin-Doyle
W
,
Essebag
V
,
Zimetbaum
P
,
Reynolds
MR
.
Trends in US hospitalization rates and rhythm control therapies following publication of the AFFIRM and RACE trials
.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
2011
;
22
:
548
553
.

2

Frick
M
,
Frykman
V
,
Jensen-Urstad
M
,
Ostergren
J
,
Rosenqvist
M
.
Factors predicting success rate and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after first electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
.
Clin Cardiol
2001
;
24
:
238
244
.

3

Cappato
R
,
Ezekowitz
MD
,
Klein
AL
,
Camm
AJ
,
Ma
CS
,
Le Heuzey
JY
, et al.
Rivaroxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation
.
Eur Heart J
2014
;
35
:
3346
3355
.

4

Klein
AL
,
Grimm
RA
,
Murray
RD
,
Apperson-Hansen
C
,
Asinger
RW
,
Black
IW
, et al.
Use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation
.
N Engl J Med
2001
;
344
:
1411
1420
.

5

Hellman
T
,
Kiviniemi
T
,
Nuotio
I
,
Vasankari
T
,
Hartikainen
J
,
Lip
GYH
, et al.
Intensity of anticoagulation and risk of thromboembolism after elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
.
Thromb Res
2017
;
156
:
163
167
.

6

Voskoboinik
A
,
Moskovitch
J
,
Plunkett
G
,
Bloom
J
,
Wong
G
,
Nalliah
C
, et al.
Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in obese patients: results from the cardioversion-BMI randomized controlled trial
.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
2019
;
30
:
155
161
.

7

Tieleman
RG
,
Van Gelder
IC
,
Crijns
HJ
,
De Kam
PJ
,
Van Den Berg
MP
,
Haaksma
J
, et al.
Early recurrences of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion: a result of fibrillation-induced electrical remodeling of the atria?
J Am Coll Cardiol
1998
;
31
:
167
173
.

8

Carlsson
J
,
Boos
C
.
Confounding factors in rate versus rhythm control trials in patients with atrial fibrillation: lessons from the strategies of treatment of atrial fibrillation (STAF) pilot study
.
Card Electrophysiol Rev
2003
;
7
:
122
126
.

9

Toso
E
,
Iannaccone
M
,
Caponi
D
,
Rotondi
F
,
Santoro
A
,
Gallo
C
, et al.
Does antiarrhythmic drugs premedication improve electrical cardioversion success in persistent atrial fibrillation?
J Electrocardiol
2017
;
50
:
294
300
.

10

Hindricks
G
,
Potpara
T
,
Dagres
N
,
Arbelo
E
,
Bax
JJ
,
Blomström-Lundqvist
C
, et al.
2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC
.
Eur Heart J
2021
;
42
:
373
498
.

11

Um
KJ
,
Healey
JS
,
McIntyre
WF
,
Mendoza
PA
,
Koziarz
A
,
Amit
G
, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Europace
2019
;
21
:
856
863
.

12

Dias SA
AE
,
Welton
NJ
,
Jansen
JP
,
Sutton
AJ
.
Network Meta-Analysis for Decision-Making
.
UK
:
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
;
2018
.

13

Higgins
JP
,
Altman
DG
,
Gotzsche
PC
,
Juni
P
,
Moher
D
,
Oxman
AD
, et al.
The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
.
BMJ
2011
;
343
:
d5928
.

14

Guyatt
G
,
Oxman
AD
,
Akl
EA
,
Kunz
R
,
Vist
G
,
Brozek
J
, et al.
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
.
J Clin Epidemiol
2011
;
64
:
383
394
.

15

Team
RC
.
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
;
2017
.

16

Rucker
G
,
Schwarzer
G
,
Carpenter
JR
,
Schumacher
M
.
Undue reliance on I(2) in assessing heterogeneity may mislead
.
BMC Med Res Methodol
2008
;
8
:
79
.

17

Brignardello-Petersen
R
,
Bonner
A
,
Alexander
PE
,
Siemieniuk
RA
,
Furukawa
TA
,
Rochwerg
B
, et al.
Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis
.
J Clin Epidemiol
2018
;
93
:
36
44
.

18

Boos
C
,
Ritzema
J
,
More
RS
.
A short course of oral amiodarone improves sinus rhythm maintenance post-cardioversion for atrial fibrillation
.
Heart
2004
;
90
:
1063
1064
.

19

Oral
H
,
Souza
JJ
,
Michaud
GF
,
Knight
BP
,
Goyal
R
,
Strickberger
SA
, et al.
Facilitating transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with ibutilide pretreatment
.
N Engl J Med
1999
;
340
:
1849
1854
.

20

Thomas
SP
,
Guy
D
,
Wallace
E
,
Crampton
R
,
Kijvanit
P
,
Eipper
V
, et al.
Rapid loading of sotalol or amiodarone for management of recent onset symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized, digoxin-controlled trial
.
Am Heart J
2004
;
147
:
E3
.

21

Joseph
AP
,
Ward
MR
.
A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of sotalol, amiodarone, and digoxin for the reversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation
.
Ann Emerg Med
2000
;
36
:
1
9
.

22

Pritchett
EL
,
Kowey
P
,
Connolly
S
,
Page
RL
,
Kerr
C
,
Wilkinson
WE
.
Antiarrhythmic efficacy of azimilide in patients with atrial fibrillation. Maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion to sinus rhythm
.
Am Heart J
2006
;
151
:
1043
1049
.

23

Villani
GQ
,
Piepoli
MF
,
Terracciano
C
,
Capucci
A
.
Effects of diltiazem pretreatment on direct-current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a single-blind, randomized, controlled study
.
Am Heart J
2000
;
140
:
e12
.

24

Guyatt
GH
,
Oxman
AD
,
Kunz
R
,
Woodcock
J
,
Brozek
J
,
Helfand
M
, et al.
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency
.
J Clin Epidemiol
2011
;
64
:
1294
1302
.

25

January
CT
,
Wann
LS
,
Alpert
JS
,
Calkins
H
,
Cigarroa
JE
,
Cleveland
JC
Jr
, et al.
2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2014
;
64
:
e1
e76
.

26

Andrade
JG
,
Aguilar
M
,
Atzema
C
,
Bell
A
,
Cairns
JA
,
Cheung
CC
, et al.
The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society comprehensive guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation
.
Can J Cardiol
2020
;
36
:
1847
1948
.

27

Singh
BN
,
Singh
SN
,
Reda
DJ
,
Tang
XC
,
Lopez
B
,
Harris
CL
, et al.
Amiodarone versus sotalol for atrial fibrillation
.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
352
:
1861
1872
.

28

Channer
KS
,
Birchall
A
,
Steeds
RP
,
Walters
SJ
,
Yeo
WW
,
West
JN
, et al.
A randomized placebo-controlled trial of pre-treatment and short- or long-term maintenance therapy with amiodarone supporting DC cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation
.
Eur Heart J
2004
;
25
:
144
150
.

29

Müssigbrodt
A
,
John
S
,
Kosiuk
J
,
Richter
S
,
Hindricks
G
,
Bollmann
A
.
Vernakalant-facilitated electrical cardioversion: comparison of intravenous vernakalant and amiodarone for drug-enhanced electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation after failed electrical cardioversion
.
Europace
2016
;
18
:
51
56
.

30

Bianconi
L
,
Mennuni
M
,
Lukic
V
,
Castro
A
,
Chieffi
M
,
Santini
M
.
Effects of oral propafenone administration before electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: a placebo-controlled study
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
1996
;
28
:
700
706
.

31

Capucci
A
,
Villani
GQ
,
Aschieri
D
,
Rosi
A
,
Piepoli
MF
.
Oral amiodarone increases the efficacy of direct-current cardioversion in restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation
.
Eur Heart J
2000
;
21
:
66
73
.

32

Climent
VE
,
Marin
F
,
Mainar
L
,
Gomez-Aldaravi
R
,
Martinez
JG
,
Chorro
FJ
, et al.
Effects of pretreatment with intravenous flecainide on efficacy of external cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation
.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
2004
;
27
:
368
372
.

33

De Simone
A
,
De Pasquale
M
,
De Matteis
C
,
Canciello
C
,
Manzo
M
,
Sabino
L
, et al.
VErapamil plus antiarrhythmic drugs reduce atrial fibrillation recurrences after an electrical cardioversion (VEPARAF Study)
.
Eur Heart J
2003
;
24
:
1425
1429
.

34

Galperin
J
,
Elizari
MV
,
Chiale
PA
,
Molina
RT
,
Ledesma
R
,
Scapin
AO
, et al.
Efficacy of amiodarone for the termination of chronic atrial fibrillation and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double blind trial
.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Therap
2001
:
341
350
.

35

Härtel
G
,
Louhija
A
,
Konttinen
A
.
Disopyramide in the prevention of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electroconversion
.
Clin Pharmacol Ther
1974
;
15
:
551
555
.

36

Hillestad
L
,
Dale
J
,
Storstein
O
.
Quinidine before direct current countershock: a controlled study
.
British Heart J
1972
;
34
:
139
142
.

37

Jacobs
LO
,
Andrews
TC
,
Pederson
DN
,
Donovan
DJ
.
Effect of intravenous procainamide on direct-current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
.
Am J Cardiol
1998
;
82
:
241
242
.

38

Jong
GP
,
Hou
ZY
,
Juang
GH
,
Chen
CY
.
Short term amiodarone treatment facilitates electrical cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial flutter/fibrillation
.
Acta Cardiol Sin
1995
;
11
:
39
46
.

39

Kanoupakis
EM
,
Manios
EG
,
Mavrakis
HE
,
Tzerakis
PG
,
Mouloudi
HK
,
Vardas
PE
.
Comparative effects of carvedilol and amiodarone on conversion and recurrence rates of persistent atrial fibrillation
.
Am J Cardiol
2004
;
94
:
659
662
.

40

Komatsu
T
,
Tachibana
H
,
Sato
Y
,
Ozawa
M
,
Ohshima
K
,
Orii
M
, et al.
A randomized study on the efficacy of intravenous cibenzoline and pilsicainide administered prior to electrical cardioversion in patients with lone paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation
.
J Cardiol
2009
;
53
:
35
42
.

41

Lombardi
F
,
Borggrefe
M
,
Ruzyllo
W
,
Lüderitz
B
; A-COMET-II Investigators.
Azimilide vs. placebo and sotalol for persistent atrial fibrillation: the A-COMET-II (Azimilide-CardiOversion MaintEnance Trial-II) trial
.
Eur Heart J
2006
;
27
:
2224
2231
.

42

Manios
EG
,
Mavrakis
HE
,
Kanoupakis
EM
,
Kallergis
EM
,
Dermitzaki
DN
,
Kambouraki
DC
, et al.
Effects of amiodarone and diltiazem on persistent atrial fibrillation conversion and recurrence rates: a randomized controlled study
.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther
2003
;
17
:
31
39
.

43

Mazzocca
G
,
Corbucci
G
,
Venturini
E
,
Becuzzi
L
.
Is pretreatment with ibutilide useful for atrial fibrillation cardioversion when combined with biphasic shock?
J Cardiovasc Med
(Hagerstown)
2006
;
7
:
124
128
.

44

Okishige
K
,
Nishizaki
M
,
Azegami
K
,
Igawa
M
,
Yamawaki
N
,
Aonuma
K
; Kanagawa Arrhythmia Task Force investigators.
Pilsicainide for conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm in chronic atrial fibrillation: a placebo-controlled, multicenter study
.
Am Heart J
2000
;
140
:
e13
.

45

Singh
S
,
Zoble
RG
,
Yellen
L
,
Brodsky
MA
,
Feld
GK
,
Berk
M
, et al.
Efficacy and safety of oral dofetilide in converting to and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter: the symptomatic atrial fibrillation investigative research on dofetilide (SAFIRE-D) study
.
Circulation
2000
;
102
:
2385
2390
.

46

Sticherling
C
,
Ozaydin
M
,
Tada
H
,
Oral
H
,
Pelosi
F
,
Knight
BP
, et al.
Comparison of verapamil and ibutilide for the suppression of immediate recurrences of atrial fibrillation after transthoracic cardioversion
.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther
2002
;
7
:
155
160
.

47

Sticherling
C
,
Behrens
S
,
Kamke
W
,
Stahn
A
,
Zabel
M
.
Comparison of acute and long-term effects of single-dose amiodarone and verapamil for the treatment of immediate recurrences of atrial fibrillation after transthoracic cardioversion
.
Europace
2005
;
7
:
546
553
.

48

Stroobandt
R
,
Stiels
B
,
Hoebrechts
R
.
Propafenone for conversion and prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation. Propafenone Atrial Fibrillation Trial Investigators
.
Am J Cardiol
1997
;
79
:
418
423
.

49

Vijayalakshmi
K
,
Whittaker
VJ
,
Sutton
A
,
Campbell
P
,
Wright
RA
,
Hall
JA
, et al.
A randomized trial of prophylactic antiarrhythmic agents (amiodarone and sotalol) in patients with atrial fibrillation for whom direct current cardioversion is planned
.
Am Heart J
2006
;
151
:
863
.
e1-6
.

Author notes

Prepared at McMaster University and the Population Health Research Institute.

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest relevant to the submitted work. R.P.W. reports grants and speaker fees from Boeringer-Ingelheim; speaker fees from Atricure, Phasebio and Cryolife; grants from Bayer and BMS-Pfizer, outside the submitted work. E.P.B.-C. reports grants from BMS-Pfizer, Bayer, and Roche Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. J.S.H. reports Research grants and speaking fees from Medtronic, Boston scientific, Abott, BMS/Pfizer, Servier, Bayer, Novartis, Myokardia, ARCA Biopharm, and Cipher Pharm outside the submitted work. W.F.M. reports speaking fees from Servier and Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. E.D. reports grants from Boeringer-Ingelheim and Roche Diagnostics. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data