-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Francisco Javier Martinez-Martin, Natalia Jimenez-Martin, Nery Sablon-Gonzalez, SGLT1 does compensate for SGLT2 inhibition, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, Volume 2, Issue 4, October 2016, Page 256, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw014
- Share Icon Share
Dear Editor, as explained in the review article on SGLT2 inhibition by de Leeuw et al.,1 SGLT2 is a low-affinity high-capacity cotransporter, expressed proximally in the tubular system (see figure 2 of de Leeuw et al., Segment S1), contrasting with SGLT1 which has higher affinity but lower capacity and is expressed more distally (see figure 2 of de Leeuw et al., Segment S3). It follows that most of the glucose reabsorption (>90%) is achieved proximally by SGLT2, and SGLT1 acts more distally on the remaining glucose (<10%) in the proximal tubule.2
It is therefore surprising to read that no compensatory role of SGLT1 has been described during SGLT2 inhibition.1 Standard doses of SGLT2 inhibitors achieve near 100% inhibition of the SGLT2 activity in humans.3 If there was no compensation, over 90% of the filtered glucose (along with a substantial amount of sodium and water) would be excreted. Clearly, this is not the case as only 30–50% of the renal glucose reabsorption is inhibited, even with extremely high doses of SGLT2 inhibitors,3 or in familial renal glucosuria.2
Conceivably, compensation by other mechanisms unrelated to SGLT1 activity might occur.3 However, an elegant experiment by Rieg et al., with SGLT1 knockout, showed conclusively that an increase in SGLT1-mediated transport fully accounts for the unexplained renal glucose reabsorption, both in pharmacological SGLT2 inhibition and in SGLT2 knockout mice.4
In conclusion, we cannot accept that no compensatory role of SGLT1 is at work during SGLT2 inhibition. Additionally, we would like to point out that SGLT2 expression in the α cells of the pancreatic islet has been reported and is involved in the regulation of glucagon secretion5; thus, Table 2 in the review1 is incomplete.