Several interesting advances in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy were presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session (ACC.24) recently in Atlanta. The aim of this article is to briefly review the clinical studies that, in the authors’ opinion, were most relevant in the field. To simplify the presentation, the studies were grouped in those that achieved (positive clinical trials) or not (negative trials) the primary endpoints, and those that even when did not reach the primary endpoints observed some promising results that can be the basis for future studies. The main characteristics and limitations of the trials are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Main characteristics of the clinical trials.

TrialPopulationTreatmentPrimary endpointResults/Limitations
1. Positive clinical trials
New investigational drugs
Bridge-TIMI 73a1
NCT05355402
Phase 2b, R, DB, PC
154 with moderate HTG (TG levels 150 to <500, median 241.5 mg/dL) plus high CV risk or severe HTG (TG levels ≥500 mg/dL)
FU: 49 weeks
Female: 42%
Olezarsen (50 or 80 mg) or placebo for an s.c. injection every 4 weeksPer cent change in TG levels from baseline to 6 monthsOlezarsen reduced TG levels by 49.3% and 53.1% (7.8% with placebo; P < 0.001 for both) and 85.7% and 93.3% of patients achieved a TG level <150 mg/dL, respectively. It also reduced APOC3 (64.2% and 73.2%, respectively), APOB (18% with both doses), and non-HDL-C, but not LDL-C, levels. Effects were maintained for 12 months.
LIBerate-HR2
NCT04806893
Phase 3, R, PC, PA
922 with established or at high risk for CVD. Baseline average LDL-C 116 mg/dL; 84% on statins, 17% on ezetimibe; 45% with DM; 10% with FHo
FU: 52 weeks
Female: 47%
Lerodalcibep 300 mg s.c. once-monthly vs. placeboChange in LDL-C at 52 weeks and average of LDL-C levels at weeks 50 and 52At 52 weeks, lerodalcibep reduced LDL-C levels (56.3% vs. 0.14% with placebo); 94% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in LDL-C. At week 52, it also reduced APOB (43%) and lipoprotein (a) (33%). Similar proportion of patients abandoned the trial due to adverse events in both arms.
SHASTA 23
NCT04720534
Phase 2b, PC, dose-ranging trial
229 with baseline fasting TG ≥500 and ≤4000 mg/dL (mean 897 mg/dL) and APOC3 of 32 mg/dL
FU: 36 weeks after the second dose
Two s.c. injections of plozasiran (ARO-APOC3, 10, 25, or 50 mg) or placebo. The first injection was given on day 1; the second at week 12.Percentage of change in fasting TG levels after 24 weeksAt 24 weeks, plozasiran dose-dependently reduced TG levels by 49%, 53%, and 57% (all P < 0.001), driven by placebo-adjusted reductions in APOC3 of 68%, 72%, and 77% (all P < 0.001), and 90.6% of patients treated with 25 or 50 mg of plozasiran achieved TG levels <500 mg/dL.
KARDIA-24
NCT05103332
Phase 2, R, DB, PC
672 with uncontrolled hypertension (untreated SBP 155–180 mm Hg; treated SBP 145–180 mm Hg); 23% with DM.
FU: 6 months
Female: 43%
Zilebesiran 600 mg s.c. vs. placebo, added to indapamide (2.5 mg/day), amlodipine (5 mg/day), or olmesartan (40 mg/day)Change in average 24 h ambulatory SBP at 3 monthsZilebesiran reduced SBP by 4–12 mm Hg. The average SBP reduction in the indapamide, amlodipine, and olmesartan groups was 18.5, 10.2, and 7.0 mm Hg (all P < 0.001). At 6 months, this difference persisted in the indapamide and amlodipine groups.
2. Drugs already approved
VICTORION-INITIATE5
NCT04929249
Phase 3b, R. OL, PG
450 with established ASCVD and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. Mean baseline LDL-C 97.4 mg/dL.
FU: 330 days
Female: 31%
Inclisiran 300 mg s.c. on days 0, 90, and 270 vs. usual care prescribed at the treating provider's judgementPer cent change from baseline in LDL-C and discontinuation of statin therapyInclisiran was superior to usual care in reducing LDL-C levels (60.0% vs. 7.0%; P < 0.001); more patients achieved LDL-C levels < 70 and <55 mg/dL: 81.8% vs. 22.2% and 71.6% vs. 8.9% (both P < 0.001) in the inclisiran arm without new safety. Statin discontinuation rates were numerically lower with inclisiran than with usual care (6.0% vs. 16.7%).
STEP-HFpEF (NCT04788511) and STEP-HFpEF DM (NCT04916470) trials6Pooled analysis
1145 with HF with LVEF ≥45%, BMI ≥30 kg/m², NYHA Class II–IV symptoms, and KCCQ-CSS <90 points.
FU: 52 weeks
Female: 49.5%
Semaglutide (0.25 mg for the first 4 weeks, uptitrated to 2–4 mg) or placebo given s.c. once weeklyDual primary endpoints were change from baseline to week 52 in KCCQ-CSS and body weightAt 52 weeks, semaglutide significantly improved KCCQ-CSS (7.5 points) and 6-min walk distance and reduced body weight (−8.4%) (all P < 0.0001). These effects were consistent across multiple patient subgroups.
ULTIMATE-DAPT7
NCT03971500
R, DB, PC and PA
3400 with an ACS event who completed the IVUS-ACS trial; 70% had single-vessel disease.
FU: 63 months
Female: 26%
All patients received DAPT (ticagrelor 90 mg b.i.d. + aspirin 100 mg) for 30 days. Then, patients who had no major ischaemic or bleeding events were randomized to DAPT or ticagrelor + placebo for 11 months.Superiority endpoint: bleeding (BARC types 2, 3, or 5). Non-inferiority endpoint: MACCE (cardiac death, MI, ischaemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization)Between 1 and 12 months after PCI, ticagrelor + placebo reduced relevant bleeding vs. DAPT (2.1% vs. 4.6%; HR = 0.45; 0.30–0.66; P < 0.0001) without increasing MACCE. Net adverse clinical events (MACCE or BARC types 1–5 bleeding) were lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy group vs. the DAPT group (5.7% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.007).
SL: 98% of participants from China and Pakistan (only 1.3% patients from Europe); 40% were enrolled with a diagnosis of unstable angina.
2. Negative trials
DEPOSITION8
NCT03954314
Phase 3, R, DD, blinded, controlled
3242 undergoing open cardiac surgery.
FU: hospital discharge or 10 days, whichever occurred sooner
Female: 22.3%
Intravenous TXA (5–10 g) through surgery or topical intraoperative TXA (treatment)Seizure without new neurologic deficit or structural changeTopical TXA did not reduce seizure incidence (P = 0.07) but increased RBC transfusion use (35.1% vs. 26.8%; absolute risk difference, 8.3%; 5.2–11.5; P = 0.007). The DSMB recommended to stop the trial for safety concerns.
SL: trial underpowered for detecting differences in seizures.
TACT2 trial10
NCT02733185
Phase 3, R, DB, 2 × 2 factorial, PC
959 (mean age 67 years) with a history of MI and DM.
FU: 48 months
Female: 27%
40 weekly infusions of EDTA (up to 3 g based on renal function) or placeboComposite of time to all-cause death, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable anginaEDTA decreased serum lead levels (61%) vs. placebo, but it did not reduce the risk of death or CV events vs. placebo (HR = 0.93; 0.76–1.16; P = 0.53).
PROACT11
NCT03265574
Phase 3, R, PA. OL
111 with breast cancer (62%) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (38%). Negative baseline troponin T levels.
Females: 78%
Enalapril (mean dose 17.7 mg) vs. placebo. Patients received ≥300 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalentCardiac troponin T release 1 month after the last dose of anthracyclineNo significant between-group differences in cardiac troponin T release (P = 0.40) or troponin I levels. Outcomes were similar in the two groups for LVEF.
AEGIS-II12
NCT03473223
Phase 3, R, DB, PC trial
18 219 patients with AMI, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and additional CV risk factors.
FU: 90 days
CSL112, human plasma-derived APO A-I, four weekly 6 g infusions vs. placeboComposite of MI, stroke, or CV death through 90 daysCSL112 did not reduce the primary endpoint (4.8% vs. 5.2%; HR = 0.93; 0.81–1.05; P = 0.24). However, the incidence of CV death or any type of MI was numerically lower in the CSL112 group at 180 (6.9% vs. 7.6%) and 365 days (9.8% vs. 10.5%). More hypersensitivity events were reported in the CSL112 group.
3. Negative trials with promising clinical results
EMPACT-MI13,14
NCT04509674
Phase 3, event-driven, R, DB
6522 hospitalized for AMI and at risk for HF; 78.4% with LVEF ≤45%, 57% with congestion.
FU: 17.9 months
Female: 25%
Empagliflozin 10 mg o.d. vs. placebo in addition to standard care within 14 days of admissionFirst hospitalization for HF and death from any causeEmpagliflozine did not reduce the primary endpoint vs. placebo (8.2% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.21). In patients with AMI and LV dysfunction or congestion, empagliflozin reduced first (3.6% vs. 4.7%; HR = 0.77; 0.60–0.98; P = 0.031) and total (0.67; 0.51–0.89; P = 0.006) HF hospitalizations.
SL: endpoint events were not centrally adjudicated; outpatient HF events were not analysed as clinical end points.
IMPROVE-HCM15
NCT04826185
Phase 2, DB
67, non-obstructive HCM. Baseline pVO2 <80%, peak LV outflow gradient <30 mm Hg, LVEF 65.4% (NYHA Class II 59%; 35% in NYHA Class II, and LVEF ≥50%).
FU: 12 weeks
Female: 55%
Ninerafaxstat (IMB-1018972) 200 mg b.i.d. or placeboSafety and tolerability of ninerafaxstatSerious adverse events: 11.8% (4/34) in the ninerafaxstat group and 6.1% (2/33) with placebo. No differences in LVEF, pVO2, BP, heart rate, or KCCQ-CSS were observed. Ninerafaxstat improved ventilatory efficiency (P = 0.006). A post hoc analysis reported an improvement in KCCQ-CCS in the 35 patients with a baseline KCCQ-CSS ≤80 (P = 0.04).
REDUCE-AMI16
NCT03278509
Phase 4, OL, PG, R, registry-based
5020 within 1–7 days after an ST- (35%) or non-ST elevation MI and LVEF ≥50%
FU: 3.5 years
Female: 23%
Metoprolol (median ≥100 mg) or bisoprolol (median ≥5 mg) or no β-blocker (usual care). β-Blockers were initiated inpatient and continued after discharge.Composite of all-cause death or MI. Secondary endpoints: all-cause death, CV death, MI, hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, and hospitalization for HFNo differences in primary (7.9% in the β-blocker group and 8.3% in the usual care group; HR = 0.96; 0.79–1.16; P = 0.64) and secondary endpoints.
SL study design (OL, registry-based); no central adjudication of endpoints; only safety endpoints associated with hospitalization were assessed; significant crossover between arms at 1 year (14%); medication adherence not assessed; increased β-blocker use in the usual care arm.
ARISE-HF18
NCT04083339
Phase 3, R, PA trial
691 patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy (stage B HF) Baseline pVO2 15.7 mL/kg/min, LVEF 62%, BMI 30.6 kg/m2, and HbA1c 6.98%; 76% with hypertension; 38% received SGLT2Is or GLP-1RA.
FU: 15 months
Female: 50.4%
AT-001 (caficrestat), 1 or 1.5 g b.i.d. vs. placeboProportional change in pVO2 at 15 monthsBy 15 months, there were no differences in pVO2 between the placebo and AT-001 groups (P = 0.19). However, in a pre-specified subgroup analysis of patients (62%) not treated with SGLT2I or GLP-1RA, AT-001 (1.5 g b.i.d.) improved pVO2 (P = 0.04) and reduced the number of patients who experienced a clinically significant worsening in cardiac functional capacity ≥6% (32.7% vs. 46%; P = 0.035).
TrialPopulationTreatmentPrimary endpointResults/Limitations
1. Positive clinical trials
New investigational drugs
Bridge-TIMI 73a1
NCT05355402
Phase 2b, R, DB, PC
154 with moderate HTG (TG levels 150 to <500, median 241.5 mg/dL) plus high CV risk or severe HTG (TG levels ≥500 mg/dL)
FU: 49 weeks
Female: 42%
Olezarsen (50 or 80 mg) or placebo for an s.c. injection every 4 weeksPer cent change in TG levels from baseline to 6 monthsOlezarsen reduced TG levels by 49.3% and 53.1% (7.8% with placebo; P < 0.001 for both) and 85.7% and 93.3% of patients achieved a TG level <150 mg/dL, respectively. It also reduced APOC3 (64.2% and 73.2%, respectively), APOB (18% with both doses), and non-HDL-C, but not LDL-C, levels. Effects were maintained for 12 months.
LIBerate-HR2
NCT04806893
Phase 3, R, PC, PA
922 with established or at high risk for CVD. Baseline average LDL-C 116 mg/dL; 84% on statins, 17% on ezetimibe; 45% with DM; 10% with FHo
FU: 52 weeks
Female: 47%
Lerodalcibep 300 mg s.c. once-monthly vs. placeboChange in LDL-C at 52 weeks and average of LDL-C levels at weeks 50 and 52At 52 weeks, lerodalcibep reduced LDL-C levels (56.3% vs. 0.14% with placebo); 94% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in LDL-C. At week 52, it also reduced APOB (43%) and lipoprotein (a) (33%). Similar proportion of patients abandoned the trial due to adverse events in both arms.
SHASTA 23
NCT04720534
Phase 2b, PC, dose-ranging trial
229 with baseline fasting TG ≥500 and ≤4000 mg/dL (mean 897 mg/dL) and APOC3 of 32 mg/dL
FU: 36 weeks after the second dose
Two s.c. injections of plozasiran (ARO-APOC3, 10, 25, or 50 mg) or placebo. The first injection was given on day 1; the second at week 12.Percentage of change in fasting TG levels after 24 weeksAt 24 weeks, plozasiran dose-dependently reduced TG levels by 49%, 53%, and 57% (all P < 0.001), driven by placebo-adjusted reductions in APOC3 of 68%, 72%, and 77% (all P < 0.001), and 90.6% of patients treated with 25 or 50 mg of plozasiran achieved TG levels <500 mg/dL.
KARDIA-24
NCT05103332
Phase 2, R, DB, PC
672 with uncontrolled hypertension (untreated SBP 155–180 mm Hg; treated SBP 145–180 mm Hg); 23% with DM.
FU: 6 months
Female: 43%
Zilebesiran 600 mg s.c. vs. placebo, added to indapamide (2.5 mg/day), amlodipine (5 mg/day), or olmesartan (40 mg/day)Change in average 24 h ambulatory SBP at 3 monthsZilebesiran reduced SBP by 4–12 mm Hg. The average SBP reduction in the indapamide, amlodipine, and olmesartan groups was 18.5, 10.2, and 7.0 mm Hg (all P < 0.001). At 6 months, this difference persisted in the indapamide and amlodipine groups.
2. Drugs already approved
VICTORION-INITIATE5
NCT04929249
Phase 3b, R. OL, PG
450 with established ASCVD and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. Mean baseline LDL-C 97.4 mg/dL.
FU: 330 days
Female: 31%
Inclisiran 300 mg s.c. on days 0, 90, and 270 vs. usual care prescribed at the treating provider's judgementPer cent change from baseline in LDL-C and discontinuation of statin therapyInclisiran was superior to usual care in reducing LDL-C levels (60.0% vs. 7.0%; P < 0.001); more patients achieved LDL-C levels < 70 and <55 mg/dL: 81.8% vs. 22.2% and 71.6% vs. 8.9% (both P < 0.001) in the inclisiran arm without new safety. Statin discontinuation rates were numerically lower with inclisiran than with usual care (6.0% vs. 16.7%).
STEP-HFpEF (NCT04788511) and STEP-HFpEF DM (NCT04916470) trials6Pooled analysis
1145 with HF with LVEF ≥45%, BMI ≥30 kg/m², NYHA Class II–IV symptoms, and KCCQ-CSS <90 points.
FU: 52 weeks
Female: 49.5%
Semaglutide (0.25 mg for the first 4 weeks, uptitrated to 2–4 mg) or placebo given s.c. once weeklyDual primary endpoints were change from baseline to week 52 in KCCQ-CSS and body weightAt 52 weeks, semaglutide significantly improved KCCQ-CSS (7.5 points) and 6-min walk distance and reduced body weight (−8.4%) (all P < 0.0001). These effects were consistent across multiple patient subgroups.
ULTIMATE-DAPT7
NCT03971500
R, DB, PC and PA
3400 with an ACS event who completed the IVUS-ACS trial; 70% had single-vessel disease.
FU: 63 months
Female: 26%
All patients received DAPT (ticagrelor 90 mg b.i.d. + aspirin 100 mg) for 30 days. Then, patients who had no major ischaemic or bleeding events were randomized to DAPT or ticagrelor + placebo for 11 months.Superiority endpoint: bleeding (BARC types 2, 3, or 5). Non-inferiority endpoint: MACCE (cardiac death, MI, ischaemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization)Between 1 and 12 months after PCI, ticagrelor + placebo reduced relevant bleeding vs. DAPT (2.1% vs. 4.6%; HR = 0.45; 0.30–0.66; P < 0.0001) without increasing MACCE. Net adverse clinical events (MACCE or BARC types 1–5 bleeding) were lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy group vs. the DAPT group (5.7% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.007).
SL: 98% of participants from China and Pakistan (only 1.3% patients from Europe); 40% were enrolled with a diagnosis of unstable angina.
2. Negative trials
DEPOSITION8
NCT03954314
Phase 3, R, DD, blinded, controlled
3242 undergoing open cardiac surgery.
FU: hospital discharge or 10 days, whichever occurred sooner
Female: 22.3%
Intravenous TXA (5–10 g) through surgery or topical intraoperative TXA (treatment)Seizure without new neurologic deficit or structural changeTopical TXA did not reduce seizure incidence (P = 0.07) but increased RBC transfusion use (35.1% vs. 26.8%; absolute risk difference, 8.3%; 5.2–11.5; P = 0.007). The DSMB recommended to stop the trial for safety concerns.
SL: trial underpowered for detecting differences in seizures.
TACT2 trial10
NCT02733185
Phase 3, R, DB, 2 × 2 factorial, PC
959 (mean age 67 years) with a history of MI and DM.
FU: 48 months
Female: 27%
40 weekly infusions of EDTA (up to 3 g based on renal function) or placeboComposite of time to all-cause death, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable anginaEDTA decreased serum lead levels (61%) vs. placebo, but it did not reduce the risk of death or CV events vs. placebo (HR = 0.93; 0.76–1.16; P = 0.53).
PROACT11
NCT03265574
Phase 3, R, PA. OL
111 with breast cancer (62%) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (38%). Negative baseline troponin T levels.
Females: 78%
Enalapril (mean dose 17.7 mg) vs. placebo. Patients received ≥300 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalentCardiac troponin T release 1 month after the last dose of anthracyclineNo significant between-group differences in cardiac troponin T release (P = 0.40) or troponin I levels. Outcomes were similar in the two groups for LVEF.
AEGIS-II12
NCT03473223
Phase 3, R, DB, PC trial
18 219 patients with AMI, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and additional CV risk factors.
FU: 90 days
CSL112, human plasma-derived APO A-I, four weekly 6 g infusions vs. placeboComposite of MI, stroke, or CV death through 90 daysCSL112 did not reduce the primary endpoint (4.8% vs. 5.2%; HR = 0.93; 0.81–1.05; P = 0.24). However, the incidence of CV death or any type of MI was numerically lower in the CSL112 group at 180 (6.9% vs. 7.6%) and 365 days (9.8% vs. 10.5%). More hypersensitivity events were reported in the CSL112 group.
3. Negative trials with promising clinical results
EMPACT-MI13,14
NCT04509674
Phase 3, event-driven, R, DB
6522 hospitalized for AMI and at risk for HF; 78.4% with LVEF ≤45%, 57% with congestion.
FU: 17.9 months
Female: 25%
Empagliflozin 10 mg o.d. vs. placebo in addition to standard care within 14 days of admissionFirst hospitalization for HF and death from any causeEmpagliflozine did not reduce the primary endpoint vs. placebo (8.2% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.21). In patients with AMI and LV dysfunction or congestion, empagliflozin reduced first (3.6% vs. 4.7%; HR = 0.77; 0.60–0.98; P = 0.031) and total (0.67; 0.51–0.89; P = 0.006) HF hospitalizations.
SL: endpoint events were not centrally adjudicated; outpatient HF events were not analysed as clinical end points.
IMPROVE-HCM15
NCT04826185
Phase 2, DB
67, non-obstructive HCM. Baseline pVO2 <80%, peak LV outflow gradient <30 mm Hg, LVEF 65.4% (NYHA Class II 59%; 35% in NYHA Class II, and LVEF ≥50%).
FU: 12 weeks
Female: 55%
Ninerafaxstat (IMB-1018972) 200 mg b.i.d. or placeboSafety and tolerability of ninerafaxstatSerious adverse events: 11.8% (4/34) in the ninerafaxstat group and 6.1% (2/33) with placebo. No differences in LVEF, pVO2, BP, heart rate, or KCCQ-CSS were observed. Ninerafaxstat improved ventilatory efficiency (P = 0.006). A post hoc analysis reported an improvement in KCCQ-CCS in the 35 patients with a baseline KCCQ-CSS ≤80 (P = 0.04).
REDUCE-AMI16
NCT03278509
Phase 4, OL, PG, R, registry-based
5020 within 1–7 days after an ST- (35%) or non-ST elevation MI and LVEF ≥50%
FU: 3.5 years
Female: 23%
Metoprolol (median ≥100 mg) or bisoprolol (median ≥5 mg) or no β-blocker (usual care). β-Blockers were initiated inpatient and continued after discharge.Composite of all-cause death or MI. Secondary endpoints: all-cause death, CV death, MI, hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, and hospitalization for HFNo differences in primary (7.9% in the β-blocker group and 8.3% in the usual care group; HR = 0.96; 0.79–1.16; P = 0.64) and secondary endpoints.
SL study design (OL, registry-based); no central adjudication of endpoints; only safety endpoints associated with hospitalization were assessed; significant crossover between arms at 1 year (14%); medication adherence not assessed; increased β-blocker use in the usual care arm.
ARISE-HF18
NCT04083339
Phase 3, R, PA trial
691 patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy (stage B HF) Baseline pVO2 15.7 mL/kg/min, LVEF 62%, BMI 30.6 kg/m2, and HbA1c 6.98%; 76% with hypertension; 38% received SGLT2Is or GLP-1RA.
FU: 15 months
Female: 50.4%
AT-001 (caficrestat), 1 or 1.5 g b.i.d. vs. placeboProportional change in pVO2 at 15 monthsBy 15 months, there were no differences in pVO2 between the placebo and AT-001 groups (P = 0.19). However, in a pre-specified subgroup analysis of patients (62%) not treated with SGLT2I or GLP-1RA, AT-001 (1.5 g b.i.d.) improved pVO2 (P = 0.04) and reduced the number of patients who experienced a clinically significant worsening in cardiac functional capacity ≥6% (32.7% vs. 46%; P = 0.035).

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; APO, apolipoprotein; APOC3: apolipoprotein C-III; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BARC, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; b.i.d., twice daily; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CV, cardiovascular; CVD: cardiovascular disease; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; DB, double blind; DD, double-dummy; DM, diabetes mellitus; DSMB, Data and Safety Monitoring Board; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; FHo, familial hypercholesterolaemia; FU, follow-up; GLP-1RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR, hazard ratio; HF, heart failure; HTG, hypertriglyceridaemia; KCCQ-CSS, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACCE, major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; NCT, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NYHA, New York Heart Association; OL, open label; PA, parallel assignment; PC, placebo-controlled; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PG, parallel group; pVO2, peak oxygen uptake; R, randomized; RBC, red blood cells; SBP, systolic blood pressure; s.c., subcutaneous; SGLT2I, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors; SL, study limitations; TG, triglyceride; TXA, tranexamic acid; VO2, peak oxygen uptake.

Table 1

Main characteristics of the clinical trials.

TrialPopulationTreatmentPrimary endpointResults/Limitations
1. Positive clinical trials
New investigational drugs
Bridge-TIMI 73a1
NCT05355402
Phase 2b, R, DB, PC
154 with moderate HTG (TG levels 150 to <500, median 241.5 mg/dL) plus high CV risk or severe HTG (TG levels ≥500 mg/dL)
FU: 49 weeks
Female: 42%
Olezarsen (50 or 80 mg) or placebo for an s.c. injection every 4 weeksPer cent change in TG levels from baseline to 6 monthsOlezarsen reduced TG levels by 49.3% and 53.1% (7.8% with placebo; P < 0.001 for both) and 85.7% and 93.3% of patients achieved a TG level <150 mg/dL, respectively. It also reduced APOC3 (64.2% and 73.2%, respectively), APOB (18% with both doses), and non-HDL-C, but not LDL-C, levels. Effects were maintained for 12 months.
LIBerate-HR2
NCT04806893
Phase 3, R, PC, PA
922 with established or at high risk for CVD. Baseline average LDL-C 116 mg/dL; 84% on statins, 17% on ezetimibe; 45% with DM; 10% with FHo
FU: 52 weeks
Female: 47%
Lerodalcibep 300 mg s.c. once-monthly vs. placeboChange in LDL-C at 52 weeks and average of LDL-C levels at weeks 50 and 52At 52 weeks, lerodalcibep reduced LDL-C levels (56.3% vs. 0.14% with placebo); 94% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in LDL-C. At week 52, it also reduced APOB (43%) and lipoprotein (a) (33%). Similar proportion of patients abandoned the trial due to adverse events in both arms.
SHASTA 23
NCT04720534
Phase 2b, PC, dose-ranging trial
229 with baseline fasting TG ≥500 and ≤4000 mg/dL (mean 897 mg/dL) and APOC3 of 32 mg/dL
FU: 36 weeks after the second dose
Two s.c. injections of plozasiran (ARO-APOC3, 10, 25, or 50 mg) or placebo. The first injection was given on day 1; the second at week 12.Percentage of change in fasting TG levels after 24 weeksAt 24 weeks, plozasiran dose-dependently reduced TG levels by 49%, 53%, and 57% (all P < 0.001), driven by placebo-adjusted reductions in APOC3 of 68%, 72%, and 77% (all P < 0.001), and 90.6% of patients treated with 25 or 50 mg of plozasiran achieved TG levels <500 mg/dL.
KARDIA-24
NCT05103332
Phase 2, R, DB, PC
672 with uncontrolled hypertension (untreated SBP 155–180 mm Hg; treated SBP 145–180 mm Hg); 23% with DM.
FU: 6 months
Female: 43%
Zilebesiran 600 mg s.c. vs. placebo, added to indapamide (2.5 mg/day), amlodipine (5 mg/day), or olmesartan (40 mg/day)Change in average 24 h ambulatory SBP at 3 monthsZilebesiran reduced SBP by 4–12 mm Hg. The average SBP reduction in the indapamide, amlodipine, and olmesartan groups was 18.5, 10.2, and 7.0 mm Hg (all P < 0.001). At 6 months, this difference persisted in the indapamide and amlodipine groups.
2. Drugs already approved
VICTORION-INITIATE5
NCT04929249
Phase 3b, R. OL, PG
450 with established ASCVD and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. Mean baseline LDL-C 97.4 mg/dL.
FU: 330 days
Female: 31%
Inclisiran 300 mg s.c. on days 0, 90, and 270 vs. usual care prescribed at the treating provider's judgementPer cent change from baseline in LDL-C and discontinuation of statin therapyInclisiran was superior to usual care in reducing LDL-C levels (60.0% vs. 7.0%; P < 0.001); more patients achieved LDL-C levels < 70 and <55 mg/dL: 81.8% vs. 22.2% and 71.6% vs. 8.9% (both P < 0.001) in the inclisiran arm without new safety. Statin discontinuation rates were numerically lower with inclisiran than with usual care (6.0% vs. 16.7%).
STEP-HFpEF (NCT04788511) and STEP-HFpEF DM (NCT04916470) trials6Pooled analysis
1145 with HF with LVEF ≥45%, BMI ≥30 kg/m², NYHA Class II–IV symptoms, and KCCQ-CSS <90 points.
FU: 52 weeks
Female: 49.5%
Semaglutide (0.25 mg for the first 4 weeks, uptitrated to 2–4 mg) or placebo given s.c. once weeklyDual primary endpoints were change from baseline to week 52 in KCCQ-CSS and body weightAt 52 weeks, semaglutide significantly improved KCCQ-CSS (7.5 points) and 6-min walk distance and reduced body weight (−8.4%) (all P < 0.0001). These effects were consistent across multiple patient subgroups.
ULTIMATE-DAPT7
NCT03971500
R, DB, PC and PA
3400 with an ACS event who completed the IVUS-ACS trial; 70% had single-vessel disease.
FU: 63 months
Female: 26%
All patients received DAPT (ticagrelor 90 mg b.i.d. + aspirin 100 mg) for 30 days. Then, patients who had no major ischaemic or bleeding events were randomized to DAPT or ticagrelor + placebo for 11 months.Superiority endpoint: bleeding (BARC types 2, 3, or 5). Non-inferiority endpoint: MACCE (cardiac death, MI, ischaemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization)Between 1 and 12 months after PCI, ticagrelor + placebo reduced relevant bleeding vs. DAPT (2.1% vs. 4.6%; HR = 0.45; 0.30–0.66; P < 0.0001) without increasing MACCE. Net adverse clinical events (MACCE or BARC types 1–5 bleeding) were lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy group vs. the DAPT group (5.7% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.007).
SL: 98% of participants from China and Pakistan (only 1.3% patients from Europe); 40% were enrolled with a diagnosis of unstable angina.
2. Negative trials
DEPOSITION8
NCT03954314
Phase 3, R, DD, blinded, controlled
3242 undergoing open cardiac surgery.
FU: hospital discharge or 10 days, whichever occurred sooner
Female: 22.3%
Intravenous TXA (5–10 g) through surgery or topical intraoperative TXA (treatment)Seizure without new neurologic deficit or structural changeTopical TXA did not reduce seizure incidence (P = 0.07) but increased RBC transfusion use (35.1% vs. 26.8%; absolute risk difference, 8.3%; 5.2–11.5; P = 0.007). The DSMB recommended to stop the trial for safety concerns.
SL: trial underpowered for detecting differences in seizures.
TACT2 trial10
NCT02733185
Phase 3, R, DB, 2 × 2 factorial, PC
959 (mean age 67 years) with a history of MI and DM.
FU: 48 months
Female: 27%
40 weekly infusions of EDTA (up to 3 g based on renal function) or placeboComposite of time to all-cause death, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable anginaEDTA decreased serum lead levels (61%) vs. placebo, but it did not reduce the risk of death or CV events vs. placebo (HR = 0.93; 0.76–1.16; P = 0.53).
PROACT11
NCT03265574
Phase 3, R, PA. OL
111 with breast cancer (62%) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (38%). Negative baseline troponin T levels.
Females: 78%
Enalapril (mean dose 17.7 mg) vs. placebo. Patients received ≥300 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalentCardiac troponin T release 1 month after the last dose of anthracyclineNo significant between-group differences in cardiac troponin T release (P = 0.40) or troponin I levels. Outcomes were similar in the two groups for LVEF.
AEGIS-II12
NCT03473223
Phase 3, R, DB, PC trial
18 219 patients with AMI, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and additional CV risk factors.
FU: 90 days
CSL112, human plasma-derived APO A-I, four weekly 6 g infusions vs. placeboComposite of MI, stroke, or CV death through 90 daysCSL112 did not reduce the primary endpoint (4.8% vs. 5.2%; HR = 0.93; 0.81–1.05; P = 0.24). However, the incidence of CV death or any type of MI was numerically lower in the CSL112 group at 180 (6.9% vs. 7.6%) and 365 days (9.8% vs. 10.5%). More hypersensitivity events were reported in the CSL112 group.
3. Negative trials with promising clinical results
EMPACT-MI13,14
NCT04509674
Phase 3, event-driven, R, DB
6522 hospitalized for AMI and at risk for HF; 78.4% with LVEF ≤45%, 57% with congestion.
FU: 17.9 months
Female: 25%
Empagliflozin 10 mg o.d. vs. placebo in addition to standard care within 14 days of admissionFirst hospitalization for HF and death from any causeEmpagliflozine did not reduce the primary endpoint vs. placebo (8.2% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.21). In patients with AMI and LV dysfunction or congestion, empagliflozin reduced first (3.6% vs. 4.7%; HR = 0.77; 0.60–0.98; P = 0.031) and total (0.67; 0.51–0.89; P = 0.006) HF hospitalizations.
SL: endpoint events were not centrally adjudicated; outpatient HF events were not analysed as clinical end points.
IMPROVE-HCM15
NCT04826185
Phase 2, DB
67, non-obstructive HCM. Baseline pVO2 <80%, peak LV outflow gradient <30 mm Hg, LVEF 65.4% (NYHA Class II 59%; 35% in NYHA Class II, and LVEF ≥50%).
FU: 12 weeks
Female: 55%
Ninerafaxstat (IMB-1018972) 200 mg b.i.d. or placeboSafety and tolerability of ninerafaxstatSerious adverse events: 11.8% (4/34) in the ninerafaxstat group and 6.1% (2/33) with placebo. No differences in LVEF, pVO2, BP, heart rate, or KCCQ-CSS were observed. Ninerafaxstat improved ventilatory efficiency (P = 0.006). A post hoc analysis reported an improvement in KCCQ-CCS in the 35 patients with a baseline KCCQ-CSS ≤80 (P = 0.04).
REDUCE-AMI16
NCT03278509
Phase 4, OL, PG, R, registry-based
5020 within 1–7 days after an ST- (35%) or non-ST elevation MI and LVEF ≥50%
FU: 3.5 years
Female: 23%
Metoprolol (median ≥100 mg) or bisoprolol (median ≥5 mg) or no β-blocker (usual care). β-Blockers were initiated inpatient and continued after discharge.Composite of all-cause death or MI. Secondary endpoints: all-cause death, CV death, MI, hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, and hospitalization for HFNo differences in primary (7.9% in the β-blocker group and 8.3% in the usual care group; HR = 0.96; 0.79–1.16; P = 0.64) and secondary endpoints.
SL study design (OL, registry-based); no central adjudication of endpoints; only safety endpoints associated with hospitalization were assessed; significant crossover between arms at 1 year (14%); medication adherence not assessed; increased β-blocker use in the usual care arm.
ARISE-HF18
NCT04083339
Phase 3, R, PA trial
691 patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy (stage B HF) Baseline pVO2 15.7 mL/kg/min, LVEF 62%, BMI 30.6 kg/m2, and HbA1c 6.98%; 76% with hypertension; 38% received SGLT2Is or GLP-1RA.
FU: 15 months
Female: 50.4%
AT-001 (caficrestat), 1 or 1.5 g b.i.d. vs. placeboProportional change in pVO2 at 15 monthsBy 15 months, there were no differences in pVO2 between the placebo and AT-001 groups (P = 0.19). However, in a pre-specified subgroup analysis of patients (62%) not treated with SGLT2I or GLP-1RA, AT-001 (1.5 g b.i.d.) improved pVO2 (P = 0.04) and reduced the number of patients who experienced a clinically significant worsening in cardiac functional capacity ≥6% (32.7% vs. 46%; P = 0.035).
TrialPopulationTreatmentPrimary endpointResults/Limitations
1. Positive clinical trials
New investigational drugs
Bridge-TIMI 73a1
NCT05355402
Phase 2b, R, DB, PC
154 with moderate HTG (TG levels 150 to <500, median 241.5 mg/dL) plus high CV risk or severe HTG (TG levels ≥500 mg/dL)
FU: 49 weeks
Female: 42%
Olezarsen (50 or 80 mg) or placebo for an s.c. injection every 4 weeksPer cent change in TG levels from baseline to 6 monthsOlezarsen reduced TG levels by 49.3% and 53.1% (7.8% with placebo; P < 0.001 for both) and 85.7% and 93.3% of patients achieved a TG level <150 mg/dL, respectively. It also reduced APOC3 (64.2% and 73.2%, respectively), APOB (18% with both doses), and non-HDL-C, but not LDL-C, levels. Effects were maintained for 12 months.
LIBerate-HR2
NCT04806893
Phase 3, R, PC, PA
922 with established or at high risk for CVD. Baseline average LDL-C 116 mg/dL; 84% on statins, 17% on ezetimibe; 45% with DM; 10% with FHo
FU: 52 weeks
Female: 47%
Lerodalcibep 300 mg s.c. once-monthly vs. placeboChange in LDL-C at 52 weeks and average of LDL-C levels at weeks 50 and 52At 52 weeks, lerodalcibep reduced LDL-C levels (56.3% vs. 0.14% with placebo); 94% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in LDL-C. At week 52, it also reduced APOB (43%) and lipoprotein (a) (33%). Similar proportion of patients abandoned the trial due to adverse events in both arms.
SHASTA 23
NCT04720534
Phase 2b, PC, dose-ranging trial
229 with baseline fasting TG ≥500 and ≤4000 mg/dL (mean 897 mg/dL) and APOC3 of 32 mg/dL
FU: 36 weeks after the second dose
Two s.c. injections of plozasiran (ARO-APOC3, 10, 25, or 50 mg) or placebo. The first injection was given on day 1; the second at week 12.Percentage of change in fasting TG levels after 24 weeksAt 24 weeks, plozasiran dose-dependently reduced TG levels by 49%, 53%, and 57% (all P < 0.001), driven by placebo-adjusted reductions in APOC3 of 68%, 72%, and 77% (all P < 0.001), and 90.6% of patients treated with 25 or 50 mg of plozasiran achieved TG levels <500 mg/dL.
KARDIA-24
NCT05103332
Phase 2, R, DB, PC
672 with uncontrolled hypertension (untreated SBP 155–180 mm Hg; treated SBP 145–180 mm Hg); 23% with DM.
FU: 6 months
Female: 43%
Zilebesiran 600 mg s.c. vs. placebo, added to indapamide (2.5 mg/day), amlodipine (5 mg/day), or olmesartan (40 mg/day)Change in average 24 h ambulatory SBP at 3 monthsZilebesiran reduced SBP by 4–12 mm Hg. The average SBP reduction in the indapamide, amlodipine, and olmesartan groups was 18.5, 10.2, and 7.0 mm Hg (all P < 0.001). At 6 months, this difference persisted in the indapamide and amlodipine groups.
2. Drugs already approved
VICTORION-INITIATE5
NCT04929249
Phase 3b, R. OL, PG
450 with established ASCVD and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. Mean baseline LDL-C 97.4 mg/dL.
FU: 330 days
Female: 31%
Inclisiran 300 mg s.c. on days 0, 90, and 270 vs. usual care prescribed at the treating provider's judgementPer cent change from baseline in LDL-C and discontinuation of statin therapyInclisiran was superior to usual care in reducing LDL-C levels (60.0% vs. 7.0%; P < 0.001); more patients achieved LDL-C levels < 70 and <55 mg/dL: 81.8% vs. 22.2% and 71.6% vs. 8.9% (both P < 0.001) in the inclisiran arm without new safety. Statin discontinuation rates were numerically lower with inclisiran than with usual care (6.0% vs. 16.7%).
STEP-HFpEF (NCT04788511) and STEP-HFpEF DM (NCT04916470) trials6Pooled analysis
1145 with HF with LVEF ≥45%, BMI ≥30 kg/m², NYHA Class II–IV symptoms, and KCCQ-CSS <90 points.
FU: 52 weeks
Female: 49.5%
Semaglutide (0.25 mg for the first 4 weeks, uptitrated to 2–4 mg) or placebo given s.c. once weeklyDual primary endpoints were change from baseline to week 52 in KCCQ-CSS and body weightAt 52 weeks, semaglutide significantly improved KCCQ-CSS (7.5 points) and 6-min walk distance and reduced body weight (−8.4%) (all P < 0.0001). These effects were consistent across multiple patient subgroups.
ULTIMATE-DAPT7
NCT03971500
R, DB, PC and PA
3400 with an ACS event who completed the IVUS-ACS trial; 70% had single-vessel disease.
FU: 63 months
Female: 26%
All patients received DAPT (ticagrelor 90 mg b.i.d. + aspirin 100 mg) for 30 days. Then, patients who had no major ischaemic or bleeding events were randomized to DAPT or ticagrelor + placebo for 11 months.Superiority endpoint: bleeding (BARC types 2, 3, or 5). Non-inferiority endpoint: MACCE (cardiac death, MI, ischaemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization)Between 1 and 12 months after PCI, ticagrelor + placebo reduced relevant bleeding vs. DAPT (2.1% vs. 4.6%; HR = 0.45; 0.30–0.66; P < 0.0001) without increasing MACCE. Net adverse clinical events (MACCE or BARC types 1–5 bleeding) were lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy group vs. the DAPT group (5.7% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.007).
SL: 98% of participants from China and Pakistan (only 1.3% patients from Europe); 40% were enrolled with a diagnosis of unstable angina.
2. Negative trials
DEPOSITION8
NCT03954314
Phase 3, R, DD, blinded, controlled
3242 undergoing open cardiac surgery.
FU: hospital discharge or 10 days, whichever occurred sooner
Female: 22.3%
Intravenous TXA (5–10 g) through surgery or topical intraoperative TXA (treatment)Seizure without new neurologic deficit or structural changeTopical TXA did not reduce seizure incidence (P = 0.07) but increased RBC transfusion use (35.1% vs. 26.8%; absolute risk difference, 8.3%; 5.2–11.5; P = 0.007). The DSMB recommended to stop the trial for safety concerns.
SL: trial underpowered for detecting differences in seizures.
TACT2 trial10
NCT02733185
Phase 3, R, DB, 2 × 2 factorial, PC
959 (mean age 67 years) with a history of MI and DM.
FU: 48 months
Female: 27%
40 weekly infusions of EDTA (up to 3 g based on renal function) or placeboComposite of time to all-cause death, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable anginaEDTA decreased serum lead levels (61%) vs. placebo, but it did not reduce the risk of death or CV events vs. placebo (HR = 0.93; 0.76–1.16; P = 0.53).
PROACT11
NCT03265574
Phase 3, R, PA. OL
111 with breast cancer (62%) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (38%). Negative baseline troponin T levels.
Females: 78%
Enalapril (mean dose 17.7 mg) vs. placebo. Patients received ≥300 mg/m2 doxorubicin equivalentCardiac troponin T release 1 month after the last dose of anthracyclineNo significant between-group differences in cardiac troponin T release (P = 0.40) or troponin I levels. Outcomes were similar in the two groups for LVEF.
AEGIS-II12
NCT03473223
Phase 3, R, DB, PC trial
18 219 patients with AMI, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and additional CV risk factors.
FU: 90 days
CSL112, human plasma-derived APO A-I, four weekly 6 g infusions vs. placeboComposite of MI, stroke, or CV death through 90 daysCSL112 did not reduce the primary endpoint (4.8% vs. 5.2%; HR = 0.93; 0.81–1.05; P = 0.24). However, the incidence of CV death or any type of MI was numerically lower in the CSL112 group at 180 (6.9% vs. 7.6%) and 365 days (9.8% vs. 10.5%). More hypersensitivity events were reported in the CSL112 group.
3. Negative trials with promising clinical results
EMPACT-MI13,14
NCT04509674
Phase 3, event-driven, R, DB
6522 hospitalized for AMI and at risk for HF; 78.4% with LVEF ≤45%, 57% with congestion.
FU: 17.9 months
Female: 25%
Empagliflozin 10 mg o.d. vs. placebo in addition to standard care within 14 days of admissionFirst hospitalization for HF and death from any causeEmpagliflozine did not reduce the primary endpoint vs. placebo (8.2% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.21). In patients with AMI and LV dysfunction or congestion, empagliflozin reduced first (3.6% vs. 4.7%; HR = 0.77; 0.60–0.98; P = 0.031) and total (0.67; 0.51–0.89; P = 0.006) HF hospitalizations.
SL: endpoint events were not centrally adjudicated; outpatient HF events were not analysed as clinical end points.
IMPROVE-HCM15
NCT04826185
Phase 2, DB
67, non-obstructive HCM. Baseline pVO2 <80%, peak LV outflow gradient <30 mm Hg, LVEF 65.4% (NYHA Class II 59%; 35% in NYHA Class II, and LVEF ≥50%).
FU: 12 weeks
Female: 55%
Ninerafaxstat (IMB-1018972) 200 mg b.i.d. or placeboSafety and tolerability of ninerafaxstatSerious adverse events: 11.8% (4/34) in the ninerafaxstat group and 6.1% (2/33) with placebo. No differences in LVEF, pVO2, BP, heart rate, or KCCQ-CSS were observed. Ninerafaxstat improved ventilatory efficiency (P = 0.006). A post hoc analysis reported an improvement in KCCQ-CCS in the 35 patients with a baseline KCCQ-CSS ≤80 (P = 0.04).
REDUCE-AMI16
NCT03278509
Phase 4, OL, PG, R, registry-based
5020 within 1–7 days after an ST- (35%) or non-ST elevation MI and LVEF ≥50%
FU: 3.5 years
Female: 23%
Metoprolol (median ≥100 mg) or bisoprolol (median ≥5 mg) or no β-blocker (usual care). β-Blockers were initiated inpatient and continued after discharge.Composite of all-cause death or MI. Secondary endpoints: all-cause death, CV death, MI, hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, and hospitalization for HFNo differences in primary (7.9% in the β-blocker group and 8.3% in the usual care group; HR = 0.96; 0.79–1.16; P = 0.64) and secondary endpoints.
SL study design (OL, registry-based); no central adjudication of endpoints; only safety endpoints associated with hospitalization were assessed; significant crossover between arms at 1 year (14%); medication adherence not assessed; increased β-blocker use in the usual care arm.
ARISE-HF18
NCT04083339
Phase 3, R, PA trial
691 patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy (stage B HF) Baseline pVO2 15.7 mL/kg/min, LVEF 62%, BMI 30.6 kg/m2, and HbA1c 6.98%; 76% with hypertension; 38% received SGLT2Is or GLP-1RA.
FU: 15 months
Female: 50.4%
AT-001 (caficrestat), 1 or 1.5 g b.i.d. vs. placeboProportional change in pVO2 at 15 monthsBy 15 months, there were no differences in pVO2 between the placebo and AT-001 groups (P = 0.19). However, in a pre-specified subgroup analysis of patients (62%) not treated with SGLT2I or GLP-1RA, AT-001 (1.5 g b.i.d.) improved pVO2 (P = 0.04) and reduced the number of patients who experienced a clinically significant worsening in cardiac functional capacity ≥6% (32.7% vs. 46%; P = 0.035).

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; APO, apolipoprotein; APOC3: apolipoprotein C-III; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BARC, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; b.i.d., twice daily; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CV, cardiovascular; CVD: cardiovascular disease; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; DB, double blind; DD, double-dummy; DM, diabetes mellitus; DSMB, Data and Safety Monitoring Board; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; FHo, familial hypercholesterolaemia; FU, follow-up; GLP-1RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR, hazard ratio; HF, heart failure; HTG, hypertriglyceridaemia; KCCQ-CSS, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACCE, major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; NCT, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NYHA, New York Heart Association; OL, open label; PA, parallel assignment; PC, placebo-controlled; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PG, parallel group; pVO2, peak oxygen uptake; R, randomized; RBC, red blood cells; SBP, systolic blood pressure; s.c., subcutaneous; SGLT2I, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors; SL, study limitations; TG, triglyceride; TXA, tranexamic acid; VO2, peak oxygen uptake.

Positive clinical trials

Investigational drugs

Several new lipid-lowering drugs have shown promising results on both efficacy and safety when added to standard lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). (1) Olezarsen (ISIS 678354) is an N-acetyl-galactosamine-conjugated antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) that specifically binds hepatic APOC3 mRNA to inhibit apolipoprotein (APO) C3 (APOC3) production and decrease triglyceride (TG) levels. The Bridge-TIMI 73a [A Study of Olezarsen (Formerly Known as AKCEA-APOCIII-LRx) in Adults With Hypertriglyceridemia and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (Established or at Increased Risk for), and/ or With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia] trial showed that in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia and elevated cardiovascular risk or with severe hypertriglyceridaemia, olezarsen reduced TG, APOC3, APOB, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels compared with placebo.1 Clinically relevant adverse effects were similar in the trial groups. (2) Lerodalcibep (LIB003) is a novel small recombinant fusion protein of a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 gene-binding domain (adnectin) and human serum albumin. The LIBerate-HR (Study of Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of LIB003 in CVD or High Risk for CVD Patients Needing Further LDL-C Reduction) trial found that in patients with established or at high risk for myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, lerodalcibep decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and 94% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in LDL-C (19% with placebo).2 Lerodalcibep also reduced APO and lipoprotein (a) levels and was well tolerated. (3) The dose-ranging SHASTA 2 (Study to Evaluate ARO-APOC3 in Adults With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia) trial studied the efficacy and safety of plozasiran [an APOC3-targeted small interfering RNA (siRNA), ARO-APOC3] in patients with severe hypertriglyceridaemia. At 24 and 48 weeks, the average reduction in TG levels with the higher doses of plozasiran was 74% and 58% (17% and 7% with placebo), respectively, and 90% and 77% of patients achieved TG levels <500 mg/dL.3 Plozasiran also reduced APOC3 levels (78% and 48% vs. −1% and +4% with placebo).

Zilebesiran is a first-in-class siRNA targeting hepatic synthesis of angiotensinogen, the most upstream precursor to all angiotensin peptides. Among patients with inadequately controlled hypertension despite optimal adherence with their medication regimen, the KARDIA (Zilebesiran as Add-on Therapy in Patients With Hypertension Not Adequately Controlled by a Standard of Care Antihypertensive Medication) trial found that a single subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of zilebesiran significantly reduced 24 h mean ambulatory (and office) systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared with placebo when added to indapamide, amlodipine, and olmesartan by 18.5, 10.2, and 7.0 mm Hg, respectively; SBP differences persisted after 6 months only in the indapamide and amlodipine groups.4 Zilebesiran increased the risk of mild hyperkalaemia, hypotension, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline by >30%.

The main limitations of these trials are the short follow-up that does not allow to analyse the drug effects on clinical outcomes and the long-term drug safety, including possible drug interactions. Future clinical trials are aimed at answering both questions.

Drugs already approved

The VICTORION-INITIATE (A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effect of an “Inclisiran First” Implementation Strategy Compared to Usual Care in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated LDL-C Despite Receiving Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy) trial assessed the effectiveness of an ‘inclisiran-first’ implementation strategy (addition of inclisiran to maximally tolerated statin therapy immediately upon failure to achieve acceptable LDL-C levels) compared with usual care in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL.5 During the study, more ‘inclisiran-first’ patients achieved LDL-C levels <70 and <55 mg/dL than in the usual care group (both P < 0.001) without major safety concerns compared with usual care. Statin discontinuation rates were not inferior in the inclisiran and usual care arms.

In a pre-specified pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity) and STEP-HFpEF DM (Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes) trials that recruited patients with obesity and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with and without type 2 diabetes and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) <90 points, semaglutide significantly improved HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function and reduced body weight (all P < 0.0001).6 These effects were consistent across patient subgroups.

Clinical guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor for 12 months following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event to prevent MI and stent thrombosis. The ULTIMATE-DAPT (1-month vs 12-month DAPT for ACS Patients Who Underwent PCI Stratified by IVUS: IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT Trials) trial showed that in this population, 1 month DAPT, followed by de-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy, reduces clinically relevant bleeding events without an increase in major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year.7 Indeed, net adverse clinical events [MACCE or BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) types 1–5 bleeding] were lower with ticagrelor monotherapy than those in the DAPT group (5.7% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.007). Thus, many patients undergoing PCI for an ACS event might benefit from aspirin discontinuation and maintenance on ticagrelor monotherapy after 1 month of DAPT. But before modifying clinical practice guidelines, it is necessary to confirm that the present results obtained mainly in an Asian population (only 1.2% were Europeans) can be extrapolated to Western populations. Whether the present results can be observed with prasugrel and clopidogrel merits further investigation.

Clinical trials with negative results

The DEPOSITION (Decreasing Postoperative Blood Loss by Topical vs. Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Open Cardiac Surgery) trial studied whether topical tranexamic acid (TXA) administered directly to the surgical site reduces the risk of in-hospital seizure without increasing the risk of transfusion among patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass as compared with intravenous (i.v.) TXA.8 Topical TXA did not reduce in-hospital seizures but increased red blood cell transfusions compared with i.v. TXA. Thus, trial was stopped early for safety. The trial, however, was underpowered for detecting differences in seizures. These results do not support the use of topical TXA in cardiac surgery.

The TACT (Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy) trial reported that chelation therapy with an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-based infusion regimen significantly reduced the primary endpoint (death, re-infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for angina) in patients with diabetes and prior MI.9 However, these results were not confirmed in the TACT2 (Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy 2) trial, where EDTA disodium-based chelation did not improve clinical outcomes, possibly because the basal blood lead levels were lower and a greater proportion of patients were treated with new glucose-lowering drugs [i.e. glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I)] that improve cardiovascular outcomes and were not available in the TACT trial.10 Thus, chelation therapy is not indicated in older adults with a history of MI and diabetes mellitus.

The PROACT (Can we Prevent Chemotherapy-related Heart Damage in Patients With Breast Cancer and Lymphoma?) trial found that in patients treated with high-dose anthracycline chemotherapy for breast cancer or lymphoma, enalapril did not modify troponin T release or troponin I levels, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF), or LV global longitudinal strain.11 These results suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are unlikely to play a significant role in the prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.

Additionally, the AEGIS-II (Study to Investigate CSL112 in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial found that among patients with acute MI (AMI), multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and additional cardiovascular risk factors, four weekly infusions of CSL112 (a human APO A1 derived from plasma) did not result in a lower risk of MI, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes than placebo through 90 days.12 A higher number of hypersensitivity events were reported in the CSL112 group.

Negative clinical trials with promising results

The EMPACT-MI (Effect of Empagliflozin on Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial found that early initiation of empagliflozin (10 mg o.d.) in patients hospitalized for AMI at an increased risk for HF did not reduce the risk of a first hospitalization for HF or death from any cause compared with placebo.13 However, as expected from previous studies, in patients after AMI with LV dysfunction or congestion, empagliflozin significantly reduced the risk for first and total HF hospitalizations compared with placebo.14

The IMPROVE-HCM (A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of IMB-1018972 in Patients With Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Trial) trial analysed the short-term safety of ninerafaxstat (IMB-1018972), a new mitotrope that increases myocardial metabolic efficiency, in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). At 12 weeks, more treatment emergent serious adverse events occurred in the ninerafaxstat group than in the placebo group.15 Interestingly, ninerafaxstat improved ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope; P = 0.006) and in a post hoc analysis, it improved the KCCQ-CSS in patients with a baseline score ≤80 (P = 0.04). These results open a new therapeutic approach via improving abnormal myocardial energetics in patients with non-obstructive HCM.

Currently, AMI guidelines regarding β-blocker utilization for secondary prevention in patients with preserved LVEF are uncertain. The REDUCE-AMI (Randomized Evaluation of Decreased Usage of Beta-Blockers after Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial showed that in this population, long-term treatment with metoprolol or bisoprolol did not reduce all-cause death or new non-fatal MI among patients with AMI and preserved LVEF (≥50%) compared with usual care.16 There were also no differences in other secondary endpoints. These results suggested that patients with preserved LVEF following AMI may not benefit from β-blockers without another indication for their use. However, because of the limitation of this trial (Table 1) before quitting their use, it seems prudent to await the results of ongoing randomized trials evaluating the role of β-blockers in this population.

Aldose reductase (AR) catalyzes the first and rate-limiting step in the polyol pathway. Its activity is enhanced in hyperglycaemic conditions, leading to altered cardiac metabolism, increased oxidative stress, and adverse remodelling and its inhibition prevents diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM) in animal models.17 However, in the ARISE-HF (Safety and Efficacy of AT-001 in Patients With Diabetic Cardiomyopathy) trial the selective AR inhibitor AT-001 (caficrestat) did not improve exercise capacity compared with placebo in patients with DbCM at high risk of progression to overt HF. However, in a pre-specified subgroup analysis of patients not treated with SGLT2I or GLP-1RA, AT-001 (1.5 g b.i.d.) significantly improved peak VO2 and reduced the number of patients who experienced a clinically significant worsening in cardiac functional capacity ≥6%.18 Thus, further studies are needed to determine the impact of AT-001 in patients with DbCM.

The next challenge is to confirm some of the promising results observed with some of these drugs in future studies specifically designed for each purpose. Only in this way could we know their true role in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación [PID2020-118694RB-I00], Comunidad de Madrid [P2022/BMD-7229], and Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CIBERCV: CB16/11/00303; CB16/11/00458].

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

There are no new data associated with this article.

References

1.

Bergmark
 
BA
,
Marston
 
NA
,
Prohaska
 
TA
,
Alexander
 
VJ
,
Zimerman
 
A
,
Moura
 
FA
,
Murphy
 
SA
,
Goodrich
 
EL
,
Zhang
 
S
,
Gaudet
 
D
,
Karwatowska-Prokopczuk
 
E
,
Tsimikas
 
S
,
Giugliano
 
RP
,
Sabatine
 
MS
;
Bridge-TIMI 73a Investigators
.
Olezarsen for hypertriglyceridemia in patients at high cardiovascular risk
.
N Engl J Med
 
2024
;
390
:
1770
1780
.

2.

Klug
 
E
,
Llerena
 
S
,
Burgess
 
L
,
Fourie
 
N
,
Scott
 
R
.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3, study to evaluate lerodalcibep long-term efficacy and safety in patients with, or at very-high or high risk, for cardiovascular disease on stable lipid-lowering therapy (LIBerate-HR)
.
Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session (ACC.24), 7 April 2024
,
Atlanta, GA, USA
.

3.

Gaudet
 
D
,
Pall
 
D
,
Watts
 
GF
,
Nicholls
 
SJ
,
Rosenson
 
RS
,
Modesto
 
K
,
San Martin
 
J
,
Hellawell
 
J
,
Ballantyne
 
CM
.
Plozasiran (ARO-APOC3) for severe hypertriglyceridemia: the SHASTA-2 randomized clinical trial
.
JAMA Cardiol
 
2024
:
e240959
.

4.

Bakris
 
GL
,
Desai
 
AS
,
Aswad
 
A
,
Badariene
 
J
,
Kazi
 
F
,
Karns
 
AD
.
Zilebesiran in combination with a standard-of care antihypertensive in patients with inadequately controlled hypertension: primary results from the phase 2 KARDIA-2 study
.
Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session & Expo, 7 April 2024
,
Atlanta, GA, USA
.

5.

Koren
 
MJ
,
Rodriguez
 
F
,
East
 
C
,
Toth
 
PP
,
Watwe
 
V
,
Abbas
 
CA
,
Sarwat
 
S
,
Kleeman
 
K
,
Kumar
 
B
,
Ali
 
Y
,
Jaffrani
 
N
.
An ‘inclisiran first’ strategy vs usual care in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2024
;
83
:
1939
1952
.

6.

Butler
 
J
,
Shah
 
SJ
,
Petrie
 
MC
,
Borlaug
 
BA
,
Abildstrøm
 
SZ
,
Davies
 
MJ
,
Hovingh
 
GK
,
Kitzman
 
DW
,
Møller
 
DV
,
Verma
 
S
,
Einfeldt
 
MN
,
Lindegaard
 
ML
,
Rasmussen
 
S
,
Abhayaratna
 
W
,
Ahmed
 
FZ
,
Ben-Gal
 
T
,
Chopra
 
V
,
Ezekowitz
 
JA
,
Fu
 
M
,
Ito
 
H
,
Lelonek
 
M
,
Melenovský
 
V
,
Merkely
 
B
,
Núñez
 
J
,
Perna
 
E
,
Schou
 
M
,
Senni
 
M
,
Sharma
 
K
,
Van Der Meer
 
P
,
Von Lewinski
 
D
,
Wolf
 
D
,
Kosiborod
 
MN
;
STEP-HFpEF Trial Committees and Investigators
.
Semaglutide versus placebo in people with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials
.
Lancet
 
2024
;
403
:
1635
1648
.

7.

Ge
 
Z
,
Kan
 
J
,
Gao
 
X
,
Raza
 
A
,
Zhang
 
J-J
,
Mohydin
 
BS
,
Gao
 
F
,
Shao
 
Y
,
Wang
 
Y
,
Zeng
 
H
,
Li
 
F
,
Khan
 
HS
,
Mengal
 
N
,
Cong
 
H
,
Wang
 
M
,
Chen
 
L
,
Wei
 
Y
,
Chen
 
F
,
Stone
 
GW
,
Chen
 
SL
;
ULTIMATE-DAPT investigators
.
Ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor plus aspirin from month 1 to month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ULTIMATE-DAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial
.
Lancet
 
2024
;
403
:
1866
1878
.

8.

Lamy
 
A
,
Sirota
 
DA
,
Jacques
 
F
,
Poostizadeh
 
A
,
Noiseux
 
N
,
Efremov
 
S
,
Demers
 
P
,
Akselrod
 
B
,
Wang
 
CY
,
Arora
 
RC
,
Branny
 
P
,
Mcguinness
 
SP
,
Brown
 
CD
,
Jeanmart
 
H
,
Zhao
 
Q
,
Zhang
 
H
,
Belley-Côté
 
EP
,
Whitlock
 
RP
,
Browne
 
A
,
Copland
 
I
,
Vincent
 
J
,
Khatun
 
R
,
Balasubramanian
 
K
,
Bangdiwala
 
SI
,
Mcgillion
 
MH
,
Fox-Robichaud
 
AE
,
Spence
 
J
,
Yusuf
 
S
,
Devereaux
 
PJ
;
DEPOSITION Study Group
.
Topical versus intravenous tranexamic acid in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: the DEPOSITION randomized controlled trial
.
Circulation
; .
Published online ahead of print 8 April
 
2024
.

9.

Escolar
 
E
,
Lamas
 
GA
,
Mark
 
DB
,
Boineau
 
R
,
Goertz
 
C
,
Rosenberg
 
Y
,
Nahin
 
RL
,
Ouyang
 
P
,
Rozema
 
T
,
Magaziner
 
A
,
Nahas
 
R
,
Lewis
 
EF
,
Lindblad
 
L
,
Lee
 
KL
.
The effect of an EDTA-based chelation regimen on patients with diabetes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction in the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT)
.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
 
2014
;
7
:
15
24
.

10.

Lamas
 
GA
.
The effect of edetate disodium-based chelation on cardiovascular events in patients with a prior myocardial infarction and diabetes—results of the TACT2 randomized trial
.
Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session (ACC.24), Atlanta, GA, 7 April 2024
.

11.

Austin
 
DP
.
Can we prevent chemotherapy-related heart damage in patients with breast cancer and lymphoma
?
Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session (ACC.24), Atlanta, GA, 7 April 2024
.

12.

Gibson
 
CM
,
Duffy
 
D
,
Korjian
 
S
,
Bahit
 
MC
,
Chi
 
G
,
Alexander
 
JH
,
Lincoff
 
AM
,
Heise
 
M
,
Tricoci
 
P
,
Deckelbaum
 
LI
,
Mears
 
SJ
,
Nicolau
 
JC
,
Lopes
 
RD
,
Merkely
 
B
,
Lewis
 
BS
,
Cornel
 
JH
,
Trebacz
 
J
,
Parkhomenko
 
A
,
Libby
 
P
,
Sacks
 
FM
,
Povsic
 
TJ
,
Bonaca
 
M
,
Goodman
 
SG
,
Bhatt
 
DL
,
Tendera
 
M
,
Steg
 
PG
,
Ridker
 
PM
,
Aylward
 
P
,
Kastelein
 
JJP
,
Bode
 
C
,
Mahaffey
 
KW
,
Nicholls
 
SJ
,
Pocock
 
SJ
,
Mehran
 
R
,
Harrington
 
RA
;
AEGIS-II Committees and Investigators
.
Apolipoprotein A1 infusions and cardiovascular outcomes after acute myocardial infarction
.
N Engl J Med
 
2024
;
390
:
1560
1571
.

13.

Butler
 
J
,
Jones
 
WS
,
Udell
 
JA
,
Anker
 
SD
,
Petrie
 
MC
,
Harrington
 
J
,
Mattheus
 
M
,
Zwiener
 
I
,
Amir
 
O
,
Bahit
 
MC
,
Bauersachs
 
J
,
Bayes-Genis
 
A
,
Chen
 
Y
,
Chopra
 
VK
,
Figtree
 
G
,
Ge
 
J
,
Goodman
 
SG
,
Gotcheva
 
N
,
Goto
 
S
,
Gasior
 
T
,
Jamal
 
W
,
Januzzi
 
JL
,
Jeong
 
MH
,
Lopatin
 
Y
,
Lopes
 
RD
,
Merkely
 
B
,
Parikh
 
PB
,
Parkhomenko
 
A
,
Ponikowski
 
P
,
Rossello
 
X
,
Schou
 
M
,
Simic
 
D
,
Steg
 
PG
,
Szachniewicz
 
J
,
Van Der Meer
 
P
,
Vinereanu
 
D
,
Zieroth
 
S
,
Brueckmann
 
M
,
Sumin
 
M
,
Bhatt
 
DL
,
Hernandez
 
AF
.
Empagliflozin after acute myocardial infarction
.
N Engl J Med
 
2024
;
390
:
1455
1466
.

14.

Hernandez
 
AF
,
Udell
 
JA
,
Jones
 
WS
,
Anker
 
SD
,
Petrie
 
MC
,
Harrington
 
J
,
Mattheus
 
M
,
Seide
 
S
,
Zwiener
 
I
,
Amir
 
O
,
Bahit
 
MC
,
Bauersachs
 
J
,
Bayes-Genis
 
A
,
Chen
 
Y
,
Chopra
 
VK
,
Figtree
 
G
,
Ge
 
J
,
Goodman
 
S
,
Gotcheva
 
N
,
Goto
 
S
,
Gasior
 
T
,
Jamal
 
W
,
Januzzi
 
JL
,
Jeong
 
MH
,
Lopatin
 
Y
,
Lopes
 
RD
,
Merkely
 
B
,
Parikh
 
PB
,
Parkhomenko
 
A
,
Ponikowski
 
P
,
Rossello
 
X
,
Schou
 
M
,
Simic
 
D
,
Steg
 
PG
,
Szachniewicz
 
J
,
Van Der Meer
 
P
,
Vinereanu
 
D
,
Zieroth
 
S
,
Brueckmann
 
M
,
Sumin
 
M
,
Bhatt
 
DL
,
Butler
 
J
.
Effect of empagliflozin on heart failure outcomes after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the EMPACT-MI trial
.
Circulation
; .
Published online ahead of print 6 April
 
2024
.

15.

Maron
 
MS
,
Mahmod
 
M
,
Abd Samat
 
AH
,
Choudhury
 
L
,
Massera
 
D
,
Phelan
 
DMJ
,
Cresci
 
S
,
Martinez
 
MW
,
Masri
 
A
,
Abraham
 
TP
,
Adler
 
E
,
Wever-Pinzon
 
O
,
Nagueh
 
SF
,
Lewis
 
GD
,
Chamberlin
 
P
,
Patel
 
J
,
Yavari
 
A
,
Dehbi
 
H-M
,
Sarwar
 
R
,
Raman
 
B
,
Valkovič
 
L
,
Neubauer
 
S
,
Udelson
 
JE
,
Watkins
 
H
.
Safety and efficacy of metabolic modulation with ninerafaxstat in patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2024
;
83
:
2037
2048
.

16.

Yndigegn
 
T
,
Lindahl
 
B
,
Mars
 
K
,
Alfredsson
 
J
,
Benatar
 
J
,
Brandin
 
L
,
Erlinge
 
D
,
Hallen
 
O
,
Held
 
C
,
Hjalmarsson
 
P
,
Johansson
 
P
,
Karlström
 
P
,
Kellerth
 
T
,
Marandi
 
T
,
Ravn-Fischer
 
A
,
Sundström
 
J
,
Östlund
 
O
,
Hofmann
 
R
,
Jernberg
 
T
;
REDUCE-AMI Investigators
.
Beta-blockers after myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction
.
N Engl J Med
 
2024
;
390
:
1372
1381
.

17.

Gopal
 
K
,
Karwi
 
QG
,
Tabatabaei Dakhili
 
SA
,
Wagg
 
CS
,
Zhang
 
L
,
Sun
 
Q
,
Saed
 
CT
,
Panidarapu
 
S
,
Perfetti
 
R
,
Ramasamy
 
R
,
Ussher
 
JR
,
Lopaschuk
 
GD
.
Aldose reductase inhibition alleviates diabetic cardiomyopathy and is associated with a decrease in myocardial fatty acid oxidation
.
Cardiovasc Diabetol
 
2023
;
22
:
73
.

18.

Januzzi
 
JL
,
Butler
 
J
,
Del Prato
 
S
,
Ezekowitz
 
JA
,
Ibrahim
 
NE
,
Lam
 
CSP
,
Lewis
 
GD
,
Marwick
 
TH
,
Perfetti
 
R
,
Rosenstock
 
J
,
Solomon
 
SD
,
Tang
 
WHW
,
Zannad
 
F
.
Randomized trial of a selective aldose reductase inhibitor in patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
; .
Published online ahead of print 8 April 2024
.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://dbpia.nl.go.kr/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)