Abstract

Background

Intramyocardial dissecting haematoma (IDH) is a rare life-threatening event usually complicating an acute myocardial infarction. Poor data exist about diagnosis, management, and outcome.

Case summary

We reported a case of giant IDH managed conservatively, thanks to stable clinical status and haemodynamics, which evolved towards resorption. Echocardiography and second-level imaging tools, like computed tomography scan and cardiac magnetic resonance, helped in differential diagnosis and studying the haematoma evolution over time, especially providing data about dimension, connection with the left ventricular cavity, consolidation, and resorption. The course is influenced by many factors including localization, edge integrity, and antithrombotic therapy on board. In this case, IDH resorption was observed despite the huge size and anticoagulant therapy on board, used for secondary cardioembolic protection, under close imaging follow-up.

Discussion

Intramyocardial dissecting haematoma management depends on clinical stability, and imaging provides key data about diagnosis and evolution.

Learning points
  • Intramyocardial dissecting haematoma complicating myocardial infarction can be managed conservatively in case of haemodynamic stability.

  • Echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography scan allow discrimination with pseudoaneurysm, impending cardiac rupture, and intracavitary thrombus.

  • Cardiac magnetic resonance confirms the haemorrhagic nature, adding insights on integrity and viability of the surrounding tissue.

  • Anticoagulant therapy, prescribed for secondary cardioembolic prevention, did not prevent haematoma resorption.

Introduction

Intramyocardial dissecting haematoma (IDH) consists in the penetration of blood within the myocardium creating a dissecting space, which follows the muscle planes tangential to the cardiac cavity, limited by epicardium on the outer side and endocardium on the inner.1 It differs from pseudoaneurysm, which has a transmural path barely contained by the pericardium. Intramyocardial dissecting haematoma is more likely found as complication of myocardial infarction (MI), often in patient with single-vessel disease and absent preconditioning or collateral circulation, where the necrotic tissue is prone to haemorrhagic damage even after reperfusion.2 Less frequently, it may complicate chest trauma or percutaneous procedures, e.g. coronary angioplasty. Interstitial tissue frailty can be the substrate, and microvessel rupture, the triggering event, after which intracavitary pressure forces blood propagation and widening of the dissection plane.1

Summary figure

Case presentation

Hospital admission and urgent imaging

A 74-year-old woman with a family history of ischaemic heart disease arrived at the emergency department complaining of fatigue and dry cough in the last 10 days. Clinical evaluation was unremarkable except for basal pulmonary crackles. The haemodynamic status fell within the definition of Stage B (beginning) of the shock Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions classification.3 Interstitial lung congestion was evident at chest X-ray. The 12-lead electrocardiogram demonstrated sinus rhythm with Q waves and persistent ST elevation in leads V1–4. She was admitted to the cardiology unit with diagnosis of subacute anterior MI complicated by heart failure. Fast transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showed akinesia of the whole left ventricular (LV) apex, a big mass occupying two-thirds of its volume, severe functional mitral regurgitation (MR), and mild pericardial effusion. Differential diagnosis concerned organized intraventricular thrombus vs. IDH (Table 1). The urgent thoracic computed tomography (CT) angiography demonstrated a voluminous IDH extended from mid-portion to LV apex, with hyperdensity compatible with unclotted blood [30 Hounsfield units (HU) in unenhanced acquisition], thinned myocardial walls without rupture, diffuse mild pericardial effusion, and no signs of aortic dissection (Figure 1). Blood tests confirmed the subacute setting: white blood cell count was 11.46 109/L (URL 10.00), haemoglobin 12.4 g/dL (range 12.0–15.5), high-sensitivity troponin-T 45–73 ng/L (female URL 10), creatinine 1.33 mg/dL (URL 1.0), spontaneous international normalized ratio 1.65 (normal value 1.0), bilirubin 2.55 mg/dL (URL 1.2), C-reactive protein 153.7 mg/L (URL 5.0), and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) 14 583 ng/L. Coronary angiography showed proximal left anterior descending artery occlusion, with faint collateral circulation. Given the risk of IDH expansions or free-wall rupture, no antithrombotic therapy was administered, but diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statin, and mineral corticoid antagonists were started. Considering a EuroSCORE II of 20% in the case of combined LV repair and coronary bypass grafting procedure or 13% for isolated repair, the heart team deemed the patient at very high operative risk and excluded an indication for urgent surgery. Two further elements supported this decision: the relative haemodynamic stability and the huge extent of the IDH, which would have required resection and repair of a very large area of ​​the LV.

Table 1

Differential imaging characteristics

PseudoaneurysmIDHIntramural thrombus
Echocardiography
  • Segmental outpouching of LV wall

  • Narrow neck and wide apex beneath the pericardium

  • Wall akinesia and thinning

  • Pericardial effusion, fibrin strands

  • Doppler: bidirectional flow in and out

  • High echogenicity

  • Heterogeneous

  • Endocardial layer inward, epicardial outward

  • Surrounding akinesia

  • Doppler: no flow connection to LV cavity

  • High echogenicity

  • Homogeneous

  • Endocardial layer inward, epicardial outward

  • Surrounding akinesia

  • Doppler: no flow inside the mass

CMR
  • CINE SSFP: akinetic, thinned surrounding tissue

  • Pericardial effusion

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

  • CINE SSFP: low-signal mass

  • T1w fat sat: hyperintense compared with blood, heterogeneous

  • STIR T2w: hyperintense and heterogeneous

  • Absent enhancement of the mass on EGE and LGE

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

  • CINE SSFP: low signal intensity, homogeneity

  • Absent enhancement of the mass on EGE and LGE

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

Cardiac CT scan
  • Narrow neck outpouching delimited only by pericardial layer (contained rupture)

  • Mass hyperdensity

  • About 30 HU (unenhanced acquisition)

  • Mass hyperdensity

  • About 65 HU (unenhanced acquisition)

PseudoaneurysmIDHIntramural thrombus
Echocardiography
  • Segmental outpouching of LV wall

  • Narrow neck and wide apex beneath the pericardium

  • Wall akinesia and thinning

  • Pericardial effusion, fibrin strands

  • Doppler: bidirectional flow in and out

  • High echogenicity

  • Heterogeneous

  • Endocardial layer inward, epicardial outward

  • Surrounding akinesia

  • Doppler: no flow connection to LV cavity

  • High echogenicity

  • Homogeneous

  • Endocardial layer inward, epicardial outward

  • Surrounding akinesia

  • Doppler: no flow inside the mass

CMR
  • CINE SSFP: akinetic, thinned surrounding tissue

  • Pericardial effusion

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

  • CINE SSFP: low-signal mass

  • T1w fat sat: hyperintense compared with blood, heterogeneous

  • STIR T2w: hyperintense and heterogeneous

  • Absent enhancement of the mass on EGE and LGE

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

  • CINE SSFP: low signal intensity, homogeneity

  • Absent enhancement of the mass on EGE and LGE

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

Cardiac CT scan
  • Narrow neck outpouching delimited only by pericardial layer (contained rupture)

  • Mass hyperdensity

  • About 30 HU (unenhanced acquisition)

  • Mass hyperdensity

  • About 65 HU (unenhanced acquisition)

CT, computed tomography; EGE, early gadolinium enhancement; HU, Hounsfield units; IDH, intramyocardial dissecting haematoma; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LV, left ventricle; SSFP, steady-state free precession; STIR, short-time inversion recovery; T1w, T1-weighted; T2w, T2-weighted.

Table 1

Differential imaging characteristics

PseudoaneurysmIDHIntramural thrombus
Echocardiography
  • Segmental outpouching of LV wall

  • Narrow neck and wide apex beneath the pericardium

  • Wall akinesia and thinning

  • Pericardial effusion, fibrin strands

  • Doppler: bidirectional flow in and out

  • High echogenicity

  • Heterogeneous

  • Endocardial layer inward, epicardial outward

  • Surrounding akinesia

  • Doppler: no flow connection to LV cavity

  • High echogenicity

  • Homogeneous

  • Endocardial layer inward, epicardial outward

  • Surrounding akinesia

  • Doppler: no flow inside the mass

CMR
  • CINE SSFP: akinetic, thinned surrounding tissue

  • Pericardial effusion

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

  • CINE SSFP: low-signal mass

  • T1w fat sat: hyperintense compared with blood, heterogeneous

  • STIR T2w: hyperintense and heterogeneous

  • Absent enhancement of the mass on EGE and LGE

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

  • CINE SSFP: low signal intensity, homogeneity

  • Absent enhancement of the mass on EGE and LGE

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

Cardiac CT scan
  • Narrow neck outpouching delimited only by pericardial layer (contained rupture)

  • Mass hyperdensity

  • About 30 HU (unenhanced acquisition)

  • Mass hyperdensity

  • About 65 HU (unenhanced acquisition)

PseudoaneurysmIDHIntramural thrombus
Echocardiography
  • Segmental outpouching of LV wall

  • Narrow neck and wide apex beneath the pericardium

  • Wall akinesia and thinning

  • Pericardial effusion, fibrin strands

  • Doppler: bidirectional flow in and out

  • High echogenicity

  • Heterogeneous

  • Endocardial layer inward, epicardial outward

  • Surrounding akinesia

  • Doppler: no flow connection to LV cavity

  • High echogenicity

  • Homogeneous

  • Endocardial layer inward, epicardial outward

  • Surrounding akinesia

  • Doppler: no flow inside the mass

CMR
  • CINE SSFP: akinetic, thinned surrounding tissue

  • Pericardial effusion

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

  • CINE SSFP: low-signal mass

  • T1w fat sat: hyperintense compared with blood, heterogeneous

  • STIR T2w: hyperintense and heterogeneous

  • Absent enhancement of the mass on EGE and LGE

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

  • CINE SSFP: low signal intensity, homogeneity

  • Absent enhancement of the mass on EGE and LGE

  • Late enhancement sequence: transmural myocardial wall LGE

Cardiac CT scan
  • Narrow neck outpouching delimited only by pericardial layer (contained rupture)

  • Mass hyperdensity

  • About 30 HU (unenhanced acquisition)

  • Mass hyperdensity

  • About 65 HU (unenhanced acquisition)

CT, computed tomography; EGE, early gadolinium enhancement; HU, Hounsfield units; IDH, intramyocardial dissecting haematoma; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LV, left ventricle; SSFP, steady-state free precession; STIR, short-time inversion recovery; T1w, T1-weighted; T2w, T2-weighted.

Angio-cardiac computed tomography: a voluminous mass in the left ventricle extended from the mid part to the apex with hyperdensity (unenhanced images 30 Hounsfield units) compatible with unclotted blood, mild pericardial effusion, and thinned apical myocardial wall.
Figure 1

Angio-cardiac computed tomography: a voluminous mass in the left ventricle extended from the mid part to the apex with hyperdensity (unenhanced images 30 Hounsfield units) compatible with unclotted blood, mild pericardial effusion, and thinned apical myocardial wall.

Early in-depth investigations

On the second day, contrast TTE confirmed akinesia of LV apex and mid-segments, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 20%, and increased end-diastolic diameter. The IDH, largely obliterating the LV, had heterogeneous structure and no connection with the remaining cavity and was delimited by a hyperechogenic continuous fluctuating endocardial layer (Figure 2A–C). Thanks to clinical stability, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) was performed. Cine steady-state free precession sequences showed severe LV dilation, LVEF 20%, apical and mid-segments akinesia, a giant low-signal mass surrounded by a continuous endocardial layer, and thinned epicardial infarcted area (Figure 3A and B). At T1-weighted fat sat images, the mass was hyperintense compared with blood and heterogeneous (Figure 3C). Short-time inversion recovery T2-weighted images did not show a high wall signal, making the presence of myocardial oedema unlikely, whereas the mass appeared hyperintense and heterogeneous (Figure 3D–F). At early gadolinium enhancement and at late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences, the mass appeared diffusely hypointense. Moreover, late acquisitions showed transmural LGE in all mid-apical segments, namely Numbers 7–17 of the standard American Heart Association guidelines bull’s-eye plot used for LV assessment (Figure 4A–E). The clinical course was complicated by new-onset aphasia and right hemiplegia. After neurological consultation, thrombolysis was excluded due to the high haemorrhagic risk. Baseline, 24-h brain CT scans, and angio-CT of the extra- and intracranial vessels were negative. Given the quick and complete recovery, the diagnosis was transient ischaemic attack with possible cardioembolic origin, likely favoured by slow flow inside the small remaining LV cavity. Therefore, a reduced dose of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was started, with daily echocardiographic monitoring. Gradually, LMWH dose was increased to full anticoagulation and, before discharge, imbricated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA).

Echocardiographic study at different time points showing, for each row, from left to right, the parasternal long-axis view, the short axis view at basal-mid level, and the apical four-chamber view.
Figure 2

Echocardiographic study at different time points showing, for each row, from left to right, the parasternal long-axis view, the short axis view at basal-mid level, and the apical four-chamber view.

Two- (A) and four-chamber (B) cine steady-state free precession cardiac magnetic resonance imaging views showing presence of a voluminous mass occupying mid and apical LV cavity delimited by intact endocardial and epicardial layers, mild diffuse pericardial effusion, and bilateral basal pleural effusion. (C) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging T1-weighted fat sat axial view showing the slightly hyperintensity and heterogeneous pattern of the lesion. (D, E, F) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging short-time inversion recovery T2-weighted images in short axis at basal, mid, and apical levels showing no myocardial wall oedema and hyperintense heterogeneous pattern of the mass.
Figure 3

Two- (A) and four-chamber (B) cine steady-state free precession cardiac magnetic resonance imaging views showing presence of a voluminous mass occupying mid and apical LV cavity delimited by intact endocardial and epicardial layers, mild diffuse pericardial effusion, and bilateral basal pleural effusion. (C) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging T1-weighted fat sat axial view showing the slightly hyperintensity and heterogeneous pattern of the lesion. (D, E, F) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging short-time inversion recovery T2-weighted images in short axis at basal, mid, and apical levels showing no myocardial wall oedema and hyperintense heterogeneous pattern of the mass.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging late gadolinium enhancement sequences in two- (A) and four-chamber (B) views and in basal, mid, and apical short-axis views (C, D, E) showing transmural high intensity of all mid and apical myocardial segments due to fibrosis and absent LV mass enhancement.
Figure 4

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging late gadolinium enhancement sequences in two- (A) and four-chamber (B) views and in basal, mid, and apical short-axis views (C, D, E) showing transmural high intensity of all mid and apical myocardial segments due to fibrosis and absent LV mass enhancement.

Fifteen-day transition

At 15 days, the IDH ultrasound study showed diffuse hyperechoic appearance dotted with anechoic lagoons, an evolutive pattern described in previous reports (Figure 2D–F).3 The patient status progressively improved. A second heart team evaluation excluded surgery.

Forty-day transition

Discharge TTE, 40 days after admission, confirmed a dilated ischaemic cardiomyopathy, LVEF 25%, and akinesia of LV apical and mid-segments. The IDH was largely resorbed, limited to the apex, without vacuolizations (Figure 2G–I). Therapy included oral anticoagulation, furosemide, beta-blocker, ACE inhibitor, mineral corticoid antagonist, and dapagliflozin.

Sixty-five-day transition

At 1-month follow-up, 65 days from diagnosis, she reported slight clinical improvement. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated no evidence of IDH but mid-to-apical LV aneurysm, LVEF 30%, and moderate MR (Figure 2J–L). Despite reduced blood pressure, a very low dose of sacubitril/valsartan was started. Re-evaluation was planned after 1 month, to consider primary arrhythmic prophylaxis.

Discussion

We reported the short-term favourable outcome of a giant IDH complicating a silent anterior MI. The certain diagnosis was done by colour Doppler TTE that remains the first diagnostic tool thanks to easy availability and, by angio-CT scan, feasible in the urgent setting, ruling out intraventricular thrombosis and LV free-wall rupture.4 Finally, CMRI confirmed the heterogeneous and haemorrhagic nature of the mass, intact borders, and absent viability of surrounding infarcted tissues.4 Serial multiple TTE studies showed the evolutive ultrasound pattern, somewhat described in other reports.5 Indeed, haematoma appearance may vary over time, since blood extravasation, thrombotic organization, expansion, or resorption may follow one another depending on tissue laxity, transmural wall tension, and antithrombotic therapy (Supplementary material online).6 During the long hospitalization, we could appreciate a change in IDH echo-structure at different time points (Figure 2). In the early phase, the IDH had a mixed echogenic appearance, compatible with recent bleeding and initial organization. Heterogeneity was the main characteristic, possibly related to the different state of its content, being organized thrombus hyperechoic and more recent bleed less echogenic (Figure 2A–C).5 Haematoma evolution can be further influenced by the reparative process of the infarcted area, characterized by interstitial oedema and leucocyte infiltration.7 Two weeks later, the structure appeared predominantly echo-dense, scattered with anechoic lagoons. Likely, the lesion had reduced oedema, and organized thrombus largely occupied the area. Anechoic lagoons might be due to limited and more recent bleeds, possibly favoured by ongoing anticoagulant therapy (Figure 2D–F).5,8 At 40 days, the haematoma was still echo-dense but significantly reduced in size, and vacuolizations were no longer evident. This appearance may represent an advanced phase of resorption of extravasated material (Figure 2G–I). Finally, during outpatient follow-up, no evidence of IDH was found (Figure 2J–L). In our case, anticoagulant therapy was administered after a suspected cerebral embolism, and it may have affected the clinical and echographic course of the haematoma. On one side, anticoagulation may have favoured extravasation of blood within the infarcted area in the presence of microvascular injury. On the other, anticoagulant therapy might have contributed to haematoma resorption, along with preventing additional embolic events. Although published data have shown that a direct oral anticoagulant may be equally effective and safe compared with a VKA in the setting of LV thrombosis, its use is not approved for this indication.9

Conclusions

The favourable outcome of our patient, treated conservatively, was due to the lack of progression towards free-wall rupture, as demonstrated by pericardial effusion disappearance, and towards an overt low-output state, thanks to the progressive IDH resorption. This was possible despite ongoing anticoagulation and the initial giant size of the haematoma.4,7

Lead author biography

graphic

Dr Gianni Dall’Ara graduated in Medicine and Surgery in 2007 and achieved his PhD degree in 2018 at the University of Bologna, Italy, where he currently has a position of assistant professor. His main areas of interest are interventional cardiology and acute cardiovascular care.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal – Case Reports online.

Consent: The patient provided written informed consent for data collection and publication. No personal identifying information is provided in this manuscript.

Funding: This work was supported by Fondazione Cardiologica M. Zito Sacco.

Data availability

Data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

1

Agarwal
 
G
,
Kumar
 
V
,
Srinivas
 
KH
,
Manjunath
 
CN
,
Prabhavathi
 
B
.
Left ventricular intramyocardial dissecting hematomas
.
JACC Case Rep
 
2021
;
3
:
94
98
.

2

Mishra
 
PK
,
Pathi
 
V
,
Murday
 
A
.
Post myocardial infarction left ventricular free wall rupture
.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
 
2007
;
6
:
39
42
.

3

Baran
 
DA
,
Grines
 
CL
,
Bailey
 
S
,
Burkhoff
 
D
,
Hall
 
SA
,
Henry
 
TD
, et al.  
SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock
.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
 
2019
;
94
:
29
37
.

4

Alyousef
 
T
,
Malhotra
 
S
,
Iskander
 
F
,
Gomez
 
J
,
Basu
 
A
,
Tottleben
 
J
, et al.  
Left ventricular intramyocardial dissecting hematoma: a multimodality imaging diagnostic approach
.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
 
2021
;
14
:
e012410
.

5

Zhao
 
Y
,
He
 
YH
,
Liu
 
WX
,
Sun
 
L
,
Han
 
JC
,
Man
 
TT
, et al.  
Intramyocardial dissecting hematoma after acute myocardial infarction—echocardiographic features and clinical outcome
.
Echocardiography
 
2016
;
33
:
962
969
.

6

Vargas-Barrón
 
J
,
Roldán
 
F
,
Romero-Cárdenas
 
Á
,
Molina-Carrión
 
M
,
Vázquez-Antona
 
C
,
Zabalgoitia
 
M
, et al.  
Dissecting intramyocardial hematoma: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, outcomes and delineation by echocardiography
.
Echocardiography
 
2009
;
26
:
254
261
.

7

Rossi Prat
 
M
,
De Abreu
 
M
,
Reyes
 
G
,
Wolcan
 
JD
,
Saenz
 
JX
,
Kyle
 
D
, et al.  
Intramyocardial dissecting hematoma
.
JACC Case Rep
 
2022
;
4
:
1443
1448
.

8

Roslan
 
A
,
Jauhari Aktifanus
 
AT
,
Hakim
 
N
,
Megat Samsudin
 
WN
,
Khairuddin
 
A
.
Intramyocardial dissecting hematoma in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: role of multimodality imaging in three patients treated conservatively
.
CASE (Phila)
 
2017
;
1
:
159
162
.

9

Levine
 
GN
,
McEvoy
 
JW
,
Fang
 
JC
,
Ibeh
 
C
,
McCarthy
 
CP
,
Misra
 
A
, et al.  
Management of patients at risk for and with left ventricular thrombus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association
.
Circulation
 
2022
;
146
:
e205
e223
.

Author notes

The first two authors shared lead authorship.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].
Handling Editor: Giulia Elena Mandoli
Giulia Elena Mandoli
Handling Editor
Search for other works by this author on:

Editor: Gavin Lewis,
Gavin Lewis
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
Georgios Benetos,
Georgios Benetos
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
Abdullah Abdullah
Abdullah Abdullah
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:

Supplementary data

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.