-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Federico B M Blasi, Irene Rota, Giovanna Graziadei, Marco Vicenzi, The tailor-made treatment in a particular case of pulmonary hypertension in thalassaemia intermedia: a case report, European Heart Journal - Case Reports, Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2021, ytab193, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytab193
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a haemodynamic condition, secondary to different causes. Thalassaemia may lead to PH of different origin and needs a comprehensive analysis to be correctly characterized and possibly treated.
We present a case study of a patient with a non-transfusion-dependent thalassaemia and a previous diagnosis of group 5 PH. A complete diagnostic assessment led to a specific diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic PH. Thus, we were able to start a specific therapy with riociguat that provided an improvement in terms of haemodynamic, imaging, and functional status.
A correct characterization and treatment of PH are essential in order to change the patient’s prognosis. Chronic thromboembolic PH is a treatable cause of PH in thalassemic patients and should be investigated.
Learning points
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) needs a comprehensive analysis and a multidisciplinary discussion to be correctly characterized and to change the patient’s prognosis.
Chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) should be investigated in thalassemic patients as it is a treatable disease.
We suggest the use of riociguat, a stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase, as notable choice of therapy in patients with thalassaemia and pre-capillary PH, with findings of CTEPH.
Introduction
Thalassaemia may lead to pulmonary hypertension (PH) of different origin and needs a comprehensive analysis to be correctly characterized and potentially treated.
We present a case study of a patient with a non-transfusion-dependent thalassaemia (NTDT) and a previous diagnosis of group 5 PH under current classification.1
This case proved how a complete diagnostic assessment can lead to a specific diagnosis and effective tailor-made treatment.
Timeline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case presentation
A woman born in 1975 with a diagnosis of PH was referred to our PH Clinic in June 2016 for a cardiovascular revaluation.
She was known at Rare Diseases Center of our institution for an NTDT (genotype: compound heterozygosis β° Codon 39/δβ sic, with average haemoglobin of 12 g/dL). She underwent splenectomy (in 1991) and had two events of deep vein thrombosis (2010 and 2012) treated with long-term therapy using rivaroxaban 20 mg.
A year before our contact, she underwent a right heart catheterization (RHC), which provided a diagnosis of PH (Table 1). It was considered as a group 5 PH and she was placed under specific treatment with bosentan 125 mg bid.
Haemodynamics . | On DOAC . | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|---|
(11/2015) . | (09/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
HR, b.p.m. | 78 | 75 | 75 |
SAP systolic, mmHg | 111 | 102 | 100 |
SAP diastolic, mmHg | 79 | 68 | 60 |
PAP systolic, mmHg | 90 | 94 | 70 |
PAP diastolic, mmHg | 28 | 30 | 28 |
PAP mean, mmHg | 45 | 51 | 42 |
RAP, mmHg | 7 | 6 | 4 |
PAWP, mmHg | 6 | 7 | 8 |
CO (thermodilution), L/min | 3.8 | 5.4 | 6.5 |
CI (thermodilution), L/min/m2 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 4.0 |
DPG, mmHg | 22 | 23 | 20 |
TPG, mmHg | 39 | 44 | 36 |
PVR, UW | 10.3 | 8.3 | 5.2 |
SVO2, % | 60 | 73 | 75 |
Haemodynamics . | On DOAC . | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|---|
(11/2015) . | (09/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
HR, b.p.m. | 78 | 75 | 75 |
SAP systolic, mmHg | 111 | 102 | 100 |
SAP diastolic, mmHg | 79 | 68 | 60 |
PAP systolic, mmHg | 90 | 94 | 70 |
PAP diastolic, mmHg | 28 | 30 | 28 |
PAP mean, mmHg | 45 | 51 | 42 |
RAP, mmHg | 7 | 6 | 4 |
PAWP, mmHg | 6 | 7 | 8 |
CO (thermodilution), L/min | 3.8 | 5.4 | 6.5 |
CI (thermodilution), L/min/m2 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 4.0 |
DPG, mmHg | 22 | 23 | 20 |
TPG, mmHg | 39 | 44 | 36 |
PVR, UW | 10.3 | 8.3 | 5.2 |
SVO2, % | 60 | 73 | 75 |
CI, cardiac index; CO, cardiac output; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulation (rivaroxaban); DPG, diastolic pressure gradient; ERA, endothelin receptor antagonist (bosentan); PAP, pulmonary arterial pressure; PCWP, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; RAP, right atrial pressure; SAP, systemic arterial pressure; sSGC, stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase (riociguat); SvO2, venous oxygen saturation; TPG, trans pulmonary pressure; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.
Haemodynamics . | On DOAC . | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|---|
(11/2015) . | (09/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
HR, b.p.m. | 78 | 75 | 75 |
SAP systolic, mmHg | 111 | 102 | 100 |
SAP diastolic, mmHg | 79 | 68 | 60 |
PAP systolic, mmHg | 90 | 94 | 70 |
PAP diastolic, mmHg | 28 | 30 | 28 |
PAP mean, mmHg | 45 | 51 | 42 |
RAP, mmHg | 7 | 6 | 4 |
PAWP, mmHg | 6 | 7 | 8 |
CO (thermodilution), L/min | 3.8 | 5.4 | 6.5 |
CI (thermodilution), L/min/m2 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 4.0 |
DPG, mmHg | 22 | 23 | 20 |
TPG, mmHg | 39 | 44 | 36 |
PVR, UW | 10.3 | 8.3 | 5.2 |
SVO2, % | 60 | 73 | 75 |
Haemodynamics . | On DOAC . | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|---|
(11/2015) . | (09/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
HR, b.p.m. | 78 | 75 | 75 |
SAP systolic, mmHg | 111 | 102 | 100 |
SAP diastolic, mmHg | 79 | 68 | 60 |
PAP systolic, mmHg | 90 | 94 | 70 |
PAP diastolic, mmHg | 28 | 30 | 28 |
PAP mean, mmHg | 45 | 51 | 42 |
RAP, mmHg | 7 | 6 | 4 |
PAWP, mmHg | 6 | 7 | 8 |
CO (thermodilution), L/min | 3.8 | 5.4 | 6.5 |
CI (thermodilution), L/min/m2 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 4.0 |
DPG, mmHg | 22 | 23 | 20 |
TPG, mmHg | 39 | 44 | 36 |
PVR, UW | 10.3 | 8.3 | 5.2 |
SVO2, % | 60 | 73 | 75 |
CI, cardiac index; CO, cardiac output; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulation (rivaroxaban); DPG, diastolic pressure gradient; ERA, endothelin receptor antagonist (bosentan); PAP, pulmonary arterial pressure; PCWP, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; RAP, right atrial pressure; SAP, systemic arterial pressure; sSGC, stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase (riociguat); SvO2, venous oxygen saturation; TPG, trans pulmonary pressure; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.
Once referred to our PH Clinic, the patient showed an impaired Functional Class (III NYHA FC) and elevated NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide =1085 pg/mL). Her physical examination showed no appreciable split second heart sound and no jugular distension, but a systolic murmur (2/VI) and signs of chronic venous insufficiency were noted.
We performed a morpho-functional assessment through echocardiography (Figure 1A and Table 2) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The patient presented typical findings of right ventricle (RV) overload in volume and pressure, as well as specific alterations in cardiopulmonary performance showing cardiogenic limitation, marked ventilatory inefficiency (VE/VCO2 slope 62), early decline in oxygen pulse with reduced value at peak of exercise, and peripheral oxygen desaturation (SpO2 86%) (Table 3).

Parameter . | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|
(06/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
RAA, cm2 | 27.4 | 17 |
TDD RV, mm | 54 | 36 |
TAPSE, mm | 21 | 22 |
S’ WAVE, cm/s | 10 | 13 |
TRJET vel, cm/s | 3.8 | 2.9 |
AV Gradient, mmHg | 58 | 34 |
PAPS, mmHg | 63–68 | 39 |
RVFAC, % | 21 | 37 |
Eccentric index diastole | 1.4 | 1.1 |
Eccentric index systole | 1.7 | 1.5 |
Pericardial effusion | Absent | Absent |
LVEF, % | 60 | 60 |
Parameter . | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|
(06/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
RAA, cm2 | 27.4 | 17 |
TDD RV, mm | 54 | 36 |
TAPSE, mm | 21 | 22 |
S’ WAVE, cm/s | 10 | 13 |
TRJET vel, cm/s | 3.8 | 2.9 |
AV Gradient, mmHg | 58 | 34 |
PAPS, mmHg | 63–68 | 39 |
RVFAC, % | 21 | 37 |
Eccentric index diastole | 1.4 | 1.1 |
Eccentric index systole | 1.7 | 1.5 |
Pericardial effusion | Absent | Absent |
LVEF, % | 60 | 60 |
AV gradient, atrio-ventricular gradient; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulation (rivaroxaban); ERA, endothelin receptor antagonist (bosentan); LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction.; PAPs, estimated systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; RAA, right atrial area; RVFAC, right ventricular fractional area change; S’ wave, TDI-derived tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity; sSGC, stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase (riociguat); TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TDD RV, Right Ventricle’s TeleDiastolic Diameter; TRjet vel, tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.
Parameter . | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|
(06/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
RAA, cm2 | 27.4 | 17 |
TDD RV, mm | 54 | 36 |
TAPSE, mm | 21 | 22 |
S’ WAVE, cm/s | 10 | 13 |
TRJET vel, cm/s | 3.8 | 2.9 |
AV Gradient, mmHg | 58 | 34 |
PAPS, mmHg | 63–68 | 39 |
RVFAC, % | 21 | 37 |
Eccentric index diastole | 1.4 | 1.1 |
Eccentric index systole | 1.7 | 1.5 |
Pericardial effusion | Absent | Absent |
LVEF, % | 60 | 60 |
Parameter . | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|
(06/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
RAA, cm2 | 27.4 | 17 |
TDD RV, mm | 54 | 36 |
TAPSE, mm | 21 | 22 |
S’ WAVE, cm/s | 10 | 13 |
TRJET vel, cm/s | 3.8 | 2.9 |
AV Gradient, mmHg | 58 | 34 |
PAPS, mmHg | 63–68 | 39 |
RVFAC, % | 21 | 37 |
Eccentric index diastole | 1.4 | 1.1 |
Eccentric index systole | 1.7 | 1.5 |
Pericardial effusion | Absent | Absent |
LVEF, % | 60 | 60 |
AV gradient, atrio-ventricular gradient; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulation (rivaroxaban); ERA, endothelin receptor antagonist (bosentan); LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction.; PAPs, estimated systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; RAA, right atrial area; RVFAC, right ventricular fractional area change; S’ wave, TDI-derived tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity; sSGC, stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase (riociguat); TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TDD RV, Right Ventricle’s TeleDiastolic Diameter; TRjet vel, tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.
. | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|
(06/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
Cause of interruption | Dyspnoea and leg exhaustion | Dyspnoea and leg exhaustion |
Maximum workload, Watt | 60 | 75 |
Maximum HR, b.p.m. (predicted %) | 155 (87) | 164 (94) |
RR | 1.2 | 1.17 |
Peak VO2/kg, mL/min/kg (predicted %) | 16.8 (59) | 19.5 (75) |
Peak O2 pulse, mL/min/b.p.m. (predicted %) | 6.4 (71) | 9.9 (104) |
VE/VCO2@lt | 51.7 | 45 |
VE/VCO2 slope | 62 | 42.7 |
PetCO2@lt, mmHg | 23 | 25 |
At rest arterial oxygen saturation, % | 93 | 95 |
Peak arterial oxygen saturation, % | 86 | 91 |
. | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|
(06/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
Cause of interruption | Dyspnoea and leg exhaustion | Dyspnoea and leg exhaustion |
Maximum workload, Watt | 60 | 75 |
Maximum HR, b.p.m. (predicted %) | 155 (87) | 164 (94) |
RR | 1.2 | 1.17 |
Peak VO2/kg, mL/min/kg (predicted %) | 16.8 (59) | 19.5 (75) |
Peak O2 pulse, mL/min/b.p.m. (predicted %) | 6.4 (71) | 9.9 (104) |
VE/VCO2@lt | 51.7 | 45 |
VE/VCO2 slope | 62 | 42.7 |
PetCO2@lt, mmHg | 23 | 25 |
At rest arterial oxygen saturation, % | 93 | 95 |
Peak arterial oxygen saturation, % | 86 | 91 |
DOAC, direct oral anticoagulation (rivaroxaban); ERA, endothelin receptor antagonist (bosentan); Peak VO2 pulse, Oxygen consumption divided by heart rate at peak exercise; Peak VO2/kg, Oxygen consumption at peak of exercise pro kilogram; PetCO2@lt, End Tidal Pressure of CO2 at the threshold.; RR, respiratory ratio; sSGC, stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase (riociguat); VE/VCO2 slope, minute ventilation and carbon dioxide production ratio’s slope at the threshold; VE/VCO2@lt, minute ventilation and carbon dioxide production ratio at the threshold; VKA, vitamin K antagonist
. | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|
(06/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
Cause of interruption | Dyspnoea and leg exhaustion | Dyspnoea and leg exhaustion |
Maximum workload, Watt | 60 | 75 |
Maximum HR, b.p.m. (predicted %) | 155 (87) | 164 (94) |
RR | 1.2 | 1.17 |
Peak VO2/kg, mL/min/kg (predicted %) | 16.8 (59) | 19.5 (75) |
Peak O2 pulse, mL/min/b.p.m. (predicted %) | 6.4 (71) | 9.9 (104) |
VE/VCO2@lt | 51.7 | 45 |
VE/VCO2 slope | 62 | 42.7 |
PetCO2@lt, mmHg | 23 | 25 |
At rest arterial oxygen saturation, % | 93 | 95 |
Peak arterial oxygen saturation, % | 86 | 91 |
. | On ERA + DOAC . | On ERA + sSGC + VKA . |
---|---|---|
(06/2016) . | (12/2017) . | |
Cause of interruption | Dyspnoea and leg exhaustion | Dyspnoea and leg exhaustion |
Maximum workload, Watt | 60 | 75 |
Maximum HR, b.p.m. (predicted %) | 155 (87) | 164 (94) |
RR | 1.2 | 1.17 |
Peak VO2/kg, mL/min/kg (predicted %) | 16.8 (59) | 19.5 (75) |
Peak O2 pulse, mL/min/b.p.m. (predicted %) | 6.4 (71) | 9.9 (104) |
VE/VCO2@lt | 51.7 | 45 |
VE/VCO2 slope | 62 | 42.7 |
PetCO2@lt, mmHg | 23 | 25 |
At rest arterial oxygen saturation, % | 93 | 95 |
Peak arterial oxygen saturation, % | 86 | 91 |
DOAC, direct oral anticoagulation (rivaroxaban); ERA, endothelin receptor antagonist (bosentan); Peak VO2 pulse, Oxygen consumption divided by heart rate at peak exercise; Peak VO2/kg, Oxygen consumption at peak of exercise pro kilogram; PetCO2@lt, End Tidal Pressure of CO2 at the threshold.; RR, respiratory ratio; sSGC, stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase (riociguat); VE/VCO2 slope, minute ventilation and carbon dioxide production ratio’s slope at the threshold; VE/VCO2@lt, minute ventilation and carbon dioxide production ratio at the threshold; VKA, vitamin K antagonist
Pulmonary function tests and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide were normal (respectively, FVC 126%, FEV1 111% and DLCO 80%, DLCO/VA 84%). Chest angioCT scan revealed irregular filling defects in the segmental arteries of the right inferior lobe, dilatation of bronchial arteries, and mosaic oligemia. Moreover, there were indirect signs of PH such as ectasia of the pulmonary arteries (common trunk: 37 mm; right pulmonary: 30 mm; left pulmonary: 27 mm), dilation of the RV and inversion of the septum IV curve. A perfusion scintigraphy (Q scan) confirmed multiple bilateral pulmonary perfusion defects (Figure 2A). Thus, we were able to redefine her PH aetiology as a form of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

In September 2016, we proceeded with RHC confirming the presence of pre-capillary PH without significant changes from baseline (Table 1).
Due to lack of evidence supporting the direct anticoagulant treatment in CTEPH, rivaroxaban was replaced by vitamin K Antagonist.1 Then, we added riociguat to bosentan 125 mg bid as therapeutic strategy recommended by guidelines.1,2 After up-titrating period (2 months), the maximum dose of riociguat was well tolerated (2.5 mg TID).
At 6 months follow-up, she reported improvement in symptoms and in FC (NYHA II).
After 12 months (December 2017) of unchanged treatment, we documented a normalized NT-proBNP (168 pg/mL) and an impressive improvement in all instrumental parameters.
Echocardiogram showed a reverse remodelling of the right chambers, with a nearly restored shape of the interventricular septum and improved RV function (Table 2, Figure 1B, and Videos 1 and 2). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing reported improved ventilatory inefficiency (VE/VCO2 slope 42.7), progressive increase of O2 pulse with normal value at peak, and no desaturation (Table 3).
Short-axis parasternal view, baseline (left panel) and under tailor-made treatment sSGC (right panel).
Four chambers apical view, baseline (left panel) and under tailor-made treatment (right panel).
Right heart catheterization demonstrated a global improvement of haemodynamic with a 49.5% fall in pulmonary vascular resistance from baseline (Table 1).
In contrast with morphological, functional, and haemodynamic improvements, the Q scan remained substantially unmodified (Figure 2B), despite a second angioCT scan showed a partial resolution of the known proximal lesions (see Supplementary material online, Figure S1).
After surgical advice, the patient was definitively excluded from invasive treatment because of untreatable distal lesions.
To date (February 2021), the patient is still alive and in stable condition, even after a severe form of urinary tract infection complicated with sepsis and respiratory failure.
Discussion
This case demonstrates how a correct characterization of PH can change prognosis.
The form of PH linked to thalassaemia syndromes is thought to be the result of different pathogenic mechanisms, which include hypercoagulability, chronic haemolysis, and iron overload due to transfusion therapy.3 Moreover, as a consequence of splenectomy, in the peripheral blood, there is an increased presence of erythroblasts showing procoagulant molecules out of the cellular membrane.4
Splenectomy shares a significant correlation with the prevalence of PH in patients with thalassaemia intermedia.3–5 It is reasonable to assume that a percentage of pre-capillary PH could be secondary to multiple micro-embolic events and thus classified as CTEPH.
In our case, we believe that the specific drug-related pulmonary vasodilatation through riociguat led the whole clinical improvement. The recovery of RV function is a sign of greater pulmonary vascular compliance that is proved by a better cardiorespiratory and haemodynamic assessment.6,7
To date, the use of pulmonary vasodilators in thalassaemia has remained limited to single centres’ experience and no RCTs (randomized clinical trials) are available to support the routine use of such therapy.1,4 Two randomized placebo-controlled trials using riociguat, a stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), have been conducted in both PAH (pulmonary arterial hypertension) and CTEPH, but patients with PH related to haemoglobinopathies were not included in the trials.1,2 In thalassemic disorders, erythrocyte dysfunction and by-products of chronic haemolysis contribute to impaired nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability as free haemoglobin inactivates NO and its vasodilatory properties within the pulmonary circulation. Furthermore, NO synthesis is inhibited by release of arginase during haemolysis and subsequent depletion of the essential NO substrate l-arginine.4 Thus, riociguat seems acting on this target: it directly stimulates sGC regardless of NO availability and increases the sensitivity to NO, antagonizing vasoconstriction.2 To date, we are not aware of other reports regarding the use of sGC stimulators in haemoglobinopathies. Despite this, patients with thalassaemia and pre-capillary PH with findings of CTEPH may benefit from treatment with riociguat if no surgical options are available.4
Conclusion
As recommended by ERS/ESC guidelines, PH patients in group 5 need a careful diagnosis and a tailored treatment. As thalassemic patients have many risk factors for CTEPH, we cannot afford to miss a diagnosis that can lead to a specific and effective treatment. In our case, despite a still unresolved chronic thrombotic disease, we witnessed a great functional improvement and a reverse remodelling of the RV through medical therapy alone.
These changes are nothing but signs of a better prognosis: the aim of any treatment in chronic disease.
Lead author biography
Federico B.M. Blasi was born in 1992 in Italy. He completed his School of Medicine at University of Milan in 2017 with a thesis ‘role of right heart catheterization in patients with respiratory disease and indication to lung transplant’. His professional training in pulmonary hypertension passed through University of Milan, ERS course in Lausanne, and the PH clinic of Polyclinic of Milan. At present, he is a Resident in Cardiovascular disease in Ospedale di Circolo, University of Insubria, Varese.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal - Case Reports online.
Slide sets: A fully edited slide set detailing this case and suitable for local presentation is available online as Supplementary data.
Consent: The authors confirm that written consent for submission and publication of this case report including images and associated text has been obtained from the patient in line with COPE guidelines.
Conflict of interest: Marco Vicenzi reports consultancy fee paid from MSD Italy, Janssen-Cilag SpA and Neopharmed, outside the submitted work.
Funding: Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Cardiovascular Department.
Comments