-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Nader Rifai, Eleftherios P Diamandis, Y M Dennis Lo, Larry J Kricka, Peter Wilding, Jack H Ladenson, Carl T Wittwer, Advancing Laboratory Medicine through Innovation: A Tale of Six Inventors, Clinical Chemistry, Volume 58, Issue 3, 1 March 2012, Pages 502–510, https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.178582
Close - Share Icon Share
Extract
In a recent issue of Science Translational Medicine (1), Yock and colleagues of Stanford University discuss the merits and challenges of developing a discipline of medical technology innovation. Innovation is defined as “inventiveness put to use”; a discovery that results in a commercial product or service. In this provocative article, the authors discuss two main streams of educational theory and practice that together form the basis for teaching innovation: design thinking and entrepreneurship education (Fig. 1). Design thinking focuses on identifying the opportunity and need, developing the idea to solve the problem, building the prototype, and testing the product, while entrepreneurship education provides an introduction to the skills and approaches required to take a product or a service and successfully commercialize it. The authors argue that medical technology innovation is the ideal environment for interdisciplinary team building combining physicians, engineers, scientists, and business professionals.
In laboratory medicine, numerous scientists and physicians have been able to successfully launch their inventions into the marketplace; inventions that changed the practice of medicine. Six of those inventors were invited to share their success stories with the readers of Clinical Chemistry. How did they do it? What influenced most their success? What were the major drivers for their pursuits? Did they have formal training in the innovation process? In addition, they were asked to score, in terms of relevance, 20 factors that influenced their endeavors (Fig. 2).
