-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Matthew S Petrie, Kara L Lynch, Alan HB Wu, Angela A Steinhardt, Gary L Horowitz, Prescription Compliance or Illicit Designer Drug Abuse?, Clinical Chemistry, Volume 58, Issue 12, 1 December 2012, Pages 1631–1634, https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.174649
- Share Icon Share
Extract
CASE DESCRIPTION
A 62-year-old Caucasian woman underwent evaluation for possible liver transplantation. She had end-stage cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C and alcohol abuse. Among the tests ordered were urine screens for various drugs of abuse, including amphetamines, for which the patient's urine sample was positive. Given the patient's history of alcohol abuse and possible other drug abuse, her physicians questioned her in detail about recent use of any illicit substances. The patient stated emphatically that she had used no recreational drugs for the past 15 years. The physicians wondered what could be the cause of a false-positive result and relayed to the laboratory that the patient was on several medications. The laboratory arranged to have the initial sample analyzed for amphetamines by GC-MS. The result was reported as negative for amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA),3 and 3,4-methylenedioxy-amphetamine (MDA). In addition, the laboratory contacted the manufacturer of the screening immunoassay used [Amphetamines II, a kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution (KIMS) assay; Roche Diagnostics] and was informed that the medications that the patient had been prescribed, namely trazodone and bupropion, had been tested and did not exhibit any cross-reactivity.